French ban on face covering
It has been suggested that this article be merged with French law on secularity and conspicuous religious symbols in schools. (Discuss) Proposed since March 2019.
|Part of a series on|
|Islamic female dress|
|Practice and law by country|
The French ban on face covering (French: LOI n° 2010-1192: Loi interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public, "Law of 2010-1192: Act prohibiting concealment of the face in public space") is an act of parliament passed by the Senate of France on 14 September 2010, resulting in the ban on the wearing of face-covering headgear, including masks, helmets, balaclavas, niqābs and other veils covering the face in public places, except under specified circumstances.[better source needed] The ban also applies to the burqa, a full-body covering, if it covers the face. Consequently, full body costumes and Zentais (skin-tight garments covering entire body) were banned. The bill had previously been passed by the National Assembly of France on 13 July 2010. In April 2011, France became the first European country to impose a ban on full-face veils in public areas.
Public debate exacerbated concerns over immigration, nationalism, secularism, security, and sexuality. Arguments supporting this proposal include that face-coverings prevent the clear identification of a person (which is both a security risk, and a social hindrance within a society which relies on facial recognition and expression in communication), that the alleged forcing of women to cover their faces is sexist, and that Muslims who continue this practice should be forced to assimilate traditional French social norms. Argument against include that the ban encroaches on individual freedoms, and that it discriminates against interpretations of Islam that require or encourage women to wear face coverings, that it takes away the choice of women to decide whether to dress according to a particular standard of modesty, and prevents anonymity in situations where it might be socially or personally desirable. Opponents[who?] accused President Nicolas Sarkozy of fostering Islamophobia and using the law for political gain.
As of 11 April 2011, it is illegal to wear a face-covering veil or other masks in public spaces. Veils, scarves and other headwear that do not cover the face are unaffected by this law. The law imposes a fine of up to €150, and/or participation in citizenship education, for those who violate the law. The bill also penalises, with a fine of €30,000 and one year in prison, anyone who forces (by violence, threats, or abuse of power) another to wear face coverings; these penalties may be doubled if the victim is under the age of 18.
As a result of the law, the only exceptions to a woman wearing a face-covering veil in public will be if she is travelling in a private car or worshiping in a religious place. French police say that while there are five million Muslims in France, fewer than 2,000 are thought to fully cover their faces with a veil. The wearing of all conspicuous religious symbols in public schools was previously banned in 2004 by a different law, the French law on secularity and conspicuous religious symbols in schools. This affected the wearing of Islamic veils and headscarves in schools, as well as turbans and other distinctive items of dress.
The law was challenged and taken to the European Court of Human Rights which upheld the French law on 1 July 2014, accepting the argument of the French government that the law was based on "a certain idea of living together". In October 2018, the United Nations Human Rights Committee declared that France's ban disproportionately harmed the right of women to manifest their religious beliefs, and could have the effects of "confining them to their homes, impeding their access to public services and marginalizing them." Research shows that the headscarf ban reduced the economic and social integration of Muslim women into French society.
The French Parliament began an initial inquiry on the issue shortly after President Nicolas Sarkozy stated in June 2009 that religious face veils were "not welcome" within France. Sarkozy had stated that the law is to protect women from being forced to cover their faces and to uphold France's secular values. A poll carried out by Pew Research Center leading up to the vote indicated that 80% of French voters supported the ban. It was estimated that about 2,000 women wore the head coverings to be banned by this bill.
In 2010, the Belgian lower house of parliament approved a bill to ban facial coverings, but this was not voted into law as the Belgian government fell before the Senate could vote on it. As of 2010, when the French law was being debated, partial bans were being discussed in the Netherlands and Spain; bans had been announced locally in Italy but later declared unconstitutional, leading to a national law being proposed; and public debate on the issue was starting in Austria, while Germany, the United Kingdom and Switzerland did not consider legislation, although in the UK, directives had been issued leaving the issue to the discretion of school directors and magistrates.
Egyptian Islamic scholar Al-Azhar opined that the face-covering veil is actually not Islamic and is not encouraged by the Quran. Instead, they say that it is part of Muslim cultural heritage.
Fadela Amara, who had recently served as a junior minister in the French government and is a Muslim, had previously declared: "The veil is the visible symbol of the subjugation of women, and therefore has no place in the mixed, secular spaces of France's state school system."
The bill was passed by the National Assembly by a vote of 335–1. The sole vote against the ban in the National Assembly was cast by Daniel Garrigue, who warned that "to fight an extremist behavior, we risk slipping toward a totalitarian society." It was passed by the Senate by a vote of 246–1, with 100 abstentions. The bill prohibits the wearing of face-coverings in public places and also applies to foreign tourists visiting France. The law imposes a fine of up to €150, and/or participation in citizenship education, for those who violate the law. The bill also penalises, with a fine of €30,000 and one year in prison, anyone who forces (by violence, threats or by abuse of power) another to wear face coverings; these penalties may be doubled if the victim is under the age of 18. The Constitutional Council of France declared the ban constitutionally valid on 7 October 2010, clearing the final legal obstacle for the law, but the law was designed to come into force after the elapse of six months from the day of its publication in the Journal Officiel.
Dalil Boubakeur, the grand mufti of the Paris Mosque, the largest and most influential in France, testified to parliament during the bill's preparation. He commented that the niqāb was not prescribed in Islam, that in the French and contemporary context its spread was associated with radicalisation and criminal behavior, and that its wearing was inconsistent with France's concept of the secular state; but that due to expected difficulties in applying a legal ban, he would prefer to see the issue handled "case by case". Mohammed Moussaoui, the president of the French Council of the Muslim Faith, opposed using a law but favored discouraging Muslim women from wearing the full veil.
Abroad, in July 2010, hundreds of Muslims protested against the bill in Karachi, Pakistan. The chief of the Pakistan-based Jamaat-e-Islami Party demanded that the UN take immediate action against France. Nasharudin Mat Isa, leader of the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party, said that the ban had made Muslims around the world angry but stated that he hoped that it would not provoke any terrorist incidents.
Abdel Muti al-Bayyumi, a member of the council of clerics at Al-Azhar Mosque in Cairo, Egypt, applauded the ban and stated that the niqāb has no basis in Sharia. He also said: "I want to send a message to Muslims in France and Europe. The niqab has no basis in Islam. I used to feel dismayed when I saw some of the sisters (in France) wearing the niqab. This does not give a good impression of Islam." Yusuf al Qaradawi, another prominent Egyptian Islamic scholar, stated that in his view "the niqab is not obligatory" while criticizing France for violating the freedom of those Muslim women who hold the view that it is and criticizing France in that "they allow other women to freely dress in a revealing and provocative manner".
Hamza Yusuf criticized the French government for the ban, writing:
While I am personally opposed to the face veil, it is a legitimate, if minority opinion, in the Islamic legal tradition for a woman to wear one. Most women who wear it believe they are following God’s injunction and not their husband’s. French laicism seems as fundamentalist as the very religious fanatics it wants to keep out. On a trip to France a few years ago, I was shocked to see pornography openly displayed on the streets in large advertisements. How odd that to unveil a woman for all to gape at is civilized, but for her to cover up to ward off gazes is a crime... While the French Prime Minister sees no problem with exposing in public places a woman’s glorious nakedness, he is oddly and quite rabidly disturbed by allowing others to cover it up. The sooner secular nations learn to allow people of faith to live their lives in peace, the sooner peace will flourish.— Hamza Yusuf, Pourquoi No Burqa?
Amnesty International condemned the passage of the bill in the Assembly as a violation of the freedom of expression of those women who wear the burqa or hijab. RTBF columnist François De Smet responded that this could not be considered a matter of freedom of expression or even religion since face coverings are but a relic of tribal tradition; that it is face coverings that amount to violation of the freedom of expression as they block the exchange of facial expressions which as Emmanuel Levinas pointed out are the basis for a moral participation in society; and that the neurotic search for purity that motivates facial coverings ultimately represents the "radical rejection of others" and conveys contempt for others who are not deemed worthy of sharing the wearer's facial expressions.
Hassen Chalghoumi, a notable imam of the mosque in Drancy near Paris who had earlier received death threats and seen his religious service interrupted by Islamists because he supported dialog with the French Jewish community, later expressed support for the ban. He stated that the full facial covering "has no place in France, a country where women have been voting since 1945" and that "the burqa is a prison for women, a tool of sexist domination and Islamist indoctrination".
In October 2010, Osama bin Laden accused France of preventing "free women from wearing the burqa" in a released recording. The ban against the face-covering veil is a frequent theme in publications linked to jihadist organisations such as Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.
The legislators provided that, once the law was declared constitutional, a six-month period for discussion and education of the affected public would follow before the law came into force. In a program overseen by the Muslim women-led Ni Putes Ni Soumises, NGO representatives and social workers conducted individual and group information meetings with women in towns and suburbs with large Muslim populations. The representatives reported instances of some women deciding to file complaints against their husbands once informed of their rights; of some others stating that they were waiting for the law to come into force so that it would compel their husbands to release them from wearing the veil; and of some others stopping the wearing of the facial veil outright after the information meetings. While no disturbances were reported during the personal meetings with the women who could be reached, the representatives reported instances of local Islamic clerics issuing fatwās against them, of being verbally harassed, of being threatened including with implied death threats, and in one case of being physically assaulted by men. In the last preparatory phase, larger meetings and public debates were organised.
Before the law entered into force, French Interior Minister Claude Guéant instructed the police to enforce the law "with tact and sensitivity", and stated that under no circumstances could force be used to remove facial coverings in public; individuals should instead be invited to show their faces to permit identification. Guéant also instructed that people arrested for wearing full facial coverings should be told about the law's motivations in a spirit of education, as the law provides.
On 22 September 2011, Hind Ahmas and Najate Nait Ali became the first women to be fined under the burqa ban after having been arrested in May for attempting to deliver an almond cake to the mayor of Meaux (a supporter of the ban) whilst wearing niqabs (the French word for fine, amende, is similar in sound to almond.) They were fined 120 and 80 Euros. Hind Ahmas announced her intention to take the case to the European Court of Human Rights. Kenza Drider announced her intention to run for the presidency whilst wearing a niqab.
On 12 December 2011, Hind Ahmas was ordered to attend a 15-day French citizenship course by another court for having worn a niqab at a protest outside the Elysee Palace on 11 April. She was not allowed into the court as she refused to remove her niqab. She announced that she was not going to attend the course, nor remove her niqab and again declared that the law was unconstitutional and reiterated her intention to take it to the European Court of Human Rights. Prosecutors responded (to the press) that she could face two years in prison and a fine of up to 32,000 Euros. Some balaclava-wearing sympathisers of Pussy Riot were arrested in Marseille in August 2012 for being in breach of the ban.
In 2013 they stood outside Elysée Palace in niqab and subsequently received a criminal conviction. The French criminal courts noted in 2014 that the lower court was wrong to dismiss her rights covered under article 18 but dismissed her appeal.:16 The French delegation argued that wearing face coverings violated the principle of “living together.” Judges Nußberger and Jäderblom dissented, calling the concept, "far-fetched and vague.":61 Going on to note that the very decision of declaring what a woman is allowed to wear was hypocritical and antithetical to the aim of protecting human rights.  The committee came to the determination in 2018 that the case had been incorrectly dismissed after review by a single judge on the grounds that, “the conditions of admissibility laid down in articles 34 and 35 of the Convention [had] not been met." Upon review the committee concluded that the applicants's human rights had been violated under article 18 and 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.:13 The committee dismissed the notion of "living together" as a vague notion not protected under international law.  Under the Optional Protocol, the government of France has been given opportunity to respond before the committee finalises their decision.
Reactions to the law's introduction
On 9 April 2011, 61 people were arrested in Paris for holding an unauthorized demonstration against the impending law.
The law came into effect on 11 April 2011. To protest the law's introduction several veiled women protested outside Notre Dame de Paris. One of the protestors, Kenza Drider, stated that she was "just expressing [her] freedom to be." The French government stated that the burqa damaged community relations. Supporters of the bill also stated that it promoted gender equality and secularism.
Police unions said in a statement that the enforcement of the law would be "extremely difficult ... if not almost impossible". Interior Minister Claude Guéant pointed out that notwithstanding any implementation difficulties "the role of the police and gendarmerie are to ensure that the law is respected." In fact, there were no publicized enforcement problems at the outset. The few demonstrators being arrested on the first day were brought in for discussion, as planned by the Interior Ministry and as consistent with the law's provision for citizenship education in lieu of a fine, and the first fines were imposed subsequently "without incident".
William Langley, former chief foreign correspondent of the Daily Mail and a commentator for the Telegraph, noted that beside support across the political spectrum, "the public overwhelmingly sees the ban as right for France, beneficial to its Muslim communities and justified", and concluded that the ban and its application "demonstrate that France has a more sophisticated concept of tolerance than Britain."
as of 2011, five months after the law came into effect, the police had noted 100 incidents of women being stopped under the law. None of them led to a punishment, though "fewer than 10" were going through the courts. Some police have wrongly given on-the-spot fines, which were later annulled. French Collective against Islamophobia reported an increase in the number of physical attacks on women wearing the niqab. Hind Ahmas, a protester against the law who was twice arrested for wearing a niqab.
Some law enforcement officers have complained of being attacked, physically while enforcing the law and then afterward in the media's portrayal. In July 2013, a husband allegedly attempted to strangle a police officer during a check of an entirely-veiled woman in Trappes and the next night a group of 250 youths threw projectiles at a police station. Clashes continued the following night and spread to Élancourt and Guyancourt.
In the Mirail district of Toulouse in April 2018, police asked a woman to remove her face-covering veil so she could be identified, but she refused and while being taken into the police vehicle started screaming. The French article states that a video recording of the event circulated social media showing the woman being beaten by police. Shortly thereafter, about 30 individuals assaulted the police officers by throwing objects at them. The officers responded with tear gas and stun grenades and had to use their weapons 18 times before being able to leave. Later the same night, there was further rioting associated with this incident in the Renerie and Bellefontaine districts of Toulouse where 11 vehicles were set afire.
According to a paper by Friedman and Merle published in Feminist Media Studies, the French news coverage was overall unifying in presenting a narrative of France's identity as a secular nation that respects religious freedom but controls its public expression. Coverage invoked republican values, legacy societal principles, and legislative approval. Very few newspapers offered perspectives that criticized the law. Women who would be directly impacted by the ban were rarely quoted as sources in news coverage.
- Anti-mask laws
- Freedom of religion in France
- French law on secularity and conspicuous religious symbols in schools
- France debate over veils
- Parliamentary Commission on Cults in France
- Human rights in France
- Swiss ban on minarets
- Saudi ban on churches
- Hijab by country
- Islamic dress in Europe
- Quebec ban on face covering
- Full text of the law (in French)
- "LOI n° 2010-1192 du 11 octobre 2010 interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public" (in French). Legifrance. Archived from the original on 29 January 2017. Retrieved 24 August 2016. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Allen, Peter (14 September 2010). "France's Senate backs National Assembly and bans women from wearing the burka in public". Daily Mail. Associated Newspapers Ltd. Retrieved 14 September 2010.
- Erlanger, Steven (13 July 2010). "Parliament Moves France Closer to a Ban on Facial Veils". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 29 April 2011. Retrieved 14 September 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Veiled women arrested at Paris protest | CBC News". CBC. Retrieved 3 October 2018.
- Friedman, Barbara; Merle, Patrick (November 2013). "Veiled Threats: Decentering and unification in transnational news coverage of the French veil ban". Feminist Media Studies. 13 (5): 770–780. doi:10.1080/14680777.2013.838357.
- "Arrests As France Enforces Veil Ban". Sky News. 11 April 2011. Retrieved 11 April 2011.
- "French senate approves burqa ban". CNN. 14 September 2010. Archived from the original on 16 September 2010. Retrieved 14 September 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Texte adopté n° 524 – Projet de loi interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public". www.assemblee-nationale.fr. Archived from the original on 15 September 2010. Retrieved 15 September 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "French Senate approves 'Burka ban'". The Telegraph. 14 September 2010. Archived from the original on 14 November 2017. Retrieved 3 April 2018. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "French Senate votes to ban Islamic full veil in public". BBC. 14 September 2010. Archived from the original on 15 September 2010. Retrieved 14 September 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- France's face veil ban to take effect next month Archived 21 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine 4 March 2011
- Willsher, Kim (1 July 2014). "France's burqa ban upheld by human rights court". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 1 July 2014. Retrieved 1 July 2014. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "France: Banning the niqab violated two Muslim women's freedom of religion - UN experts". OHCHR.org. Archived from the original on 23 October 2018. Retrieved 24 October 2018. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "How will Austria's new headscarf ban affect Muslims?". The Washington Post. 2019.
- "French Senate bans burka Bill awaits President Nicolas Sarkozy's signature". CBC News. Radio Canada. 14 September 2010. Archived from the original on 1 November 2010. Retrieved 14 September 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Shahid, Aliyah (14 September 2010). "French Senate bans burka Bill awaits President Nicolas Sarkozy's signature". New York Daily News. Archived from the original on 18 September 2010. Retrieved 14 September 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "France". Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs. Archived from the original on 6 February 2011. Retrieved 14 December 2011. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|deadurl=(help) See drop-down essay on "Contemporary Affairs"
- [dead link]Dumoulin, Frederic (14 September 2010). "French parliament adopts ban on full-face veil". Agence France-Presse. Archived from the original on 18 May 2013. Retrieved 14 September 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Belgium ban burqa-type dress; Law cites public security, securing emancipation of women". Archived from the original on 5 May 2010. Retrieved 16 September 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Jamet, Constance (15 June 2010). "Législation sur la burqa : ce qui se fait ailleurs en Europe". Le Figaro (in French). Archived from the original on 14 February 2011. Retrieved 24 March 2011. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Egypt Al-Azhar scholar supports French niqab ban". Agence France-Presse. 15 September 2010. Archived from the original on 18 September 2010. Retrieved 16 September 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- George, Rose (17 July 2006). "Ghetto warrior". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 30 August 2013. Retrieved 5 May 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "French burqa ban clears last legal obstacle". CNN. 7 October 2010. Archived from the original on 11 October 2010. Retrieved 7 October 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Testimony at the mission d’information sur la pratique du port du voile intégral sur le territoire national, 8 October 2009, archived from the original on 21 March 2012, retrieved 24 March 2011 Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Hundreds in Pakistan protest France's burqa ban". Associated Press. 19 July 2010. Archived from the original on 22 July 2010. Retrieved 15 September 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Kennedy, Dana. "Muslim World at Odds Over French Burqa Ban". AOL News. Archived from the original on 17 September 2010. Retrieved 16 September 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Ahmed El-Gharbawy (18 October 2011). "Sheikh Qaradawi's First Interview with Onislam.net". website. Archived from the original on 23 July 2011. Retrieved 13 March 2011. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Burqa ban passes French lower house overwhelmingly". CNN. 13 July 2010. Archived from the original on 8 July 2012. Retrieved 15 September 2010. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Voile intégral : la névrose de la pureté". RTBF. 26 April 2011. Archived from the original on 4 May 2011. Retrieved 23 May 2011. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Paris imam backs France's burqa ban". The Telegraph. 22 January 2010. Archived from the original on 25 January 2010. Retrieved 23 May 2011. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Bindner, Laurence (2018). "Jihadists' Grievance Narratives against France". Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Studies: 6. doi:10.19165/2018.2.01.
- Menegaux, Charlotte (23 March 2011), "Niqab : l'audacieux pari des "ambassadrices de la laïcité"", Le Figaro, archived from the original on 24 March 2011, retrieved 24 March 2011 Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Burka ban: French women fined for wearing full-face veil". Daily Telegraph. 22 September 2011. Archived from the original on 29 December 2011. Retrieved 5 March 2012. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "French mother, 32, set to become first woman to be jailed for wearing banned Islamic veil". Daily Mail. 14 December 2011. Archived from the original on 27 December 2011. Retrieved 5 March 2012. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Pro-Pussy Riot demonstrators arrested in Marseille". Archived from the original on 23 August 2012. Retrieved 28 August 2012. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "GRAND CHAMBER CASE OF S.A.S. v. FRANCE (Application no. 43835/11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG". ECHR. 1 July 2014. Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 7 March 2019. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "CCPR/C/123/D/2747/2016; Human Rights Committee Views adopted by the Committee under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol, concerning communication No. 2747/2016*,**,***". 7 December 2018. Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 11 April 2019. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Police arrest veiled women at 'burqa ban' protest". France24. 11 April 2011. Archived from the original on 13 April 2011. Retrieved 11 April 2011. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Women in face veils detained as France enforces ban". BBC. 11 April 2011. Archived from the original on 11 April 2011. Retrieved 11 April 2011. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Kim Willsher (12 April 2011). "Women detained at veil protest in France". Los Angeles Times.
- "Voile intégral : une amende de 150 euros pour une femme des Mureaux". Ouest France. 12 April 2011.
- "France's burka ban is a victory for tolerance". The Daily Telegraph. 11 April 2011. Archived from the original on 16 January 2018. Retrieved 3 April 2018. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "LOI n° 2010-1192 du 11 octobre 2010 interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public". Archived from the original on 8 March 2019. Retrieved 7 March 2019. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "France's burqa ban: women are 'effectively under house arrest'". Guardian. 19 September 2011. Archived from the original on 5 October 2013. Retrieved 5 March 2012. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Décugis, Jean-Michel; Zemouri, Aziz (24 July 2013). "EXCLUSIF. Trappes : "Les policiers se sentent stigmatisés"" [Trappes: "Police officers feel stigmatized"]. Le Point (in French). Archived from the original on 26 July 2013. Retrieved 25 July 2013. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Trappes : le policier blessé et mis en cause se porte partie civile" [Trappes: The Police officer who was injured and blamed files a civil case]. Figaro (in French). 24 July 2013. Archived from the original on 25 July 2013. Retrieved 25 July 2013. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Trappes : le mari de la femme voilée a tenté d'étrangler un policier" [Trappes: The husband of a veiled woman attempted to stranger a police officer]. Le Point (in French). 20 July 2013. Archived from the original on 23 July 2013. Retrieved 20 July 2013. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Six held over violence in France after police check veiled woman". Reuters. 20 July 2013. Archived from the original on 10 June 2015. Retrieved 1 July 2017. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Charlton, Angela; Garriga, Nicolas (21 July 2013). "French police, youths clash after veil incidentj". Associated Press. Yahoo News. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 14 January 2017. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "France veil row sparks Trappes unrest". BBC News. 21 July 2013. Archived from the original on 30 May 2017. Retrieved 20 June 2018. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "A Toulouse, le contrôle par la police d'une femme portant un niqab dégénère" (in French). Archived from the original on 21 April 2018. Retrieved 20 April 2018. Cite uses deprecated parameter