Friendly political wager

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A friendly political wager is a largely symbolic wager made between politicians representing two cities or areas on the outcome of an important sports contest between teams representing those same two cities or areas. These wagers are most commonly made in the United States and Canada on the results of playoffs in the National Hockey League, National Football League and Major League Baseball. Although they are technically a form of sports betting, they are generally considered good fun, good sportsmanship and good public relations.

Differences from typical sports betting[edit]

Friendly political wagers

  • The wagers are highly publicised, usually with official press releases.
  • The participants are generally high-ranking politicians; most commonly mayors, but also frequently including governors, and Senators and (much more rarely) even national leaders. For additional effect, the two wagering parties may be (but are not always) members of opposite political parties.[1]
  • The participants must bet in favor of the team that they represent; for instance, the mayor of Green Bay would only make a friendly wager of this sort on the outcome of a Green Bay Packers game by betting in favor of the Packers.
  • Usually occur during high-profile playoff games.
  • Are for symbolic wagers, usually prestige or local food or drink.
  • They do not involve money;
  • In the rare event money is wagered, the bet is an even bet (no point spread or money line is used) and the wager is donated to a local charity in the winner's metropolitan area[2]
  • They do not involve influencing the way the officials vote on legislation;
  • They do not involve wagering the office (a rival officeholder cannot demand his opponent's resignation).

Examples[edit]

The most common types of wager are those for symbolic value only, and those for a token food prize.

For example in the 2009–10 NFL playoffs, two bets were made:

During the 2010 Winter Olympic Games, US President Barack Obama and Canada Prime Minister Stephen Harper wagered a case of beer on the outcome of the gold medal game in the men's ice hockey tournament. President Obama sent Prime Minister Harper a case of Molson Canadian and a case of Yuengling lager (Obama's favorite beer, brewed in Pennsylvania) to settle the bet.

A similar sort of betting occurs elsewhere, although the subject is as likely not to be sport. German Green politician and gastronome Joschka Fischer was noted for betting cases of wine and fine spirits on the outcomes of German elections with politicians of other parties.

In October 2011, Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard and New Zealand Prime Minister John Key made two bets: the first on the NRL grand final between the Manly Sea Eagles and the New Zealand Warriors, wagering having to hold a press conference in front of the other country's flag; and the second on the 2011 Rugby World Cup semi-final between New Zealand and Australia, wagering having to eat an apple from the other country and speak profusely on how good it was (reflecting Australia recently lifting a ban on the import of New Zealand apples). Key subsequently lost the NRL bet, and Gillard subsequently lost the Rugby World Cup bet.[7]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Weigler, Jake (June 22, 2007), Oregon: Oregon Governor's Office http://governor.oregon.gov/Gov/P2007/press_062207.shtml Missing or empty |title= (help)
  2. ^ http://wivb.com/2018/01/05/buffalo-jacksonville-zoos-make-friendly-wager-ahead-of-bills-vs-jaguars-playoff-game/
  3. ^ [1][dead link]
  4. ^ [2][dead link]
  5. ^ [3][dead link]
  6. ^ [4][dead link]
  7. ^ "Key makes good on bet". Fairfax Media New Zealand. 10 October 2011. Retrieved 15 August 2012.