Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (Unit 2 Reactor)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (Unit 2 Reactor)
Fukushima I by Digital Globe.jpg
Satellite image on 16 March 2011 of the four damaged reactor buildings
Date 11 March 2011 (2011-03-11)
Location Ōkuma, Fukushima, Japan
Coordinates 37°25′17″N 141°1′57″E / 37.42139°N 141.03250°E / 37.42139; 141.03250
Outcome INES Level 7 (ratings by Japanese authorities as of 11 April)[1][2]
Injuries 37 with physical injuries,[3]
2 workers taken to hospital with radiation burns[4]
External video
24 hours live camera for Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster on YouTube, certified by Tokyo Electric Power Co. Inc.

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (福島第一原子力発電所事故 Fukushima Dai-ichi (About this sound pronunciation) genshiryoku hatsudensho jiko?) was a series of equipment failures, nuclear meltdowns, and releases of radioactive materials at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, following the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami on 11 March 2011.[5][6] It is the largest nuclear disaster since the Chernobyl disaster of 1986.[7]

The plant comprises six separate boiling water reactors originally designed by General Electric (GE), and maintained by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO). At the time of the quake, Reactor 4 had been de-fueled while 5 and 6 were in cold shutdown for planned maintenance.[8] Immediately after the earthquake, the remaining reactors 1-3 shut down automatically, and emergency generators came online to control electronics and coolant systems. However the tsunami following the earthquake quickly flooded the low-lying rooms in which the emergency generators were housed. The flooded generators failed, cutting power to the critical pumps that must continuously circulate coolant water through a nuclear reactor for several days in order to keep it from melting down after being shut down. As the pumps stopped, the reactors overheated due to the normal high radioactive decay heat produced in the first few days after nuclear reactor shutdown (smaller amounts of this heat normally continue to be released for years, but are not enough to cause fuel melting).

At this point, only prompt flooding of the reactors with seawater could have cooled the reactors quickly enough to prevent meltdown. Salt water flooding was delayed because it would ruin the costly reactors permanently. Flooding with seawater was finally commenced only after the government ordered that seawater be used, and at this point it was already too late to prevent meltdown.[9]

As the water boiled away in the reactors and the water levels in the fuel rod pools dropped, the reactor fuel rods began to overheat severely, and to melt down. In the hours and days that followed, Reactors 1, 2 and 3 experienced full meltdown.[10][11]

In the intense heat and pressure of the melting reactors, a reaction between the nuclear fuel metal cladding and the remaining water surrounding them produced explosive hydrogen gas. As workers struggled to cool and shut down the reactors, several hydrogen-air chemical explosions occurred.[12][13]

Concerns about the repeated small explosions, the atmospheric venting of radioactive gasses, and the possibility of larger explosions led to a 20 km (12 mi)-radius evacuation around the plant. During the early days of the accident workers were temporarily evacuated at various times for radiation safety reasons. At the same time, sea water that had been exposed to the melting rods was returned to the sea heated and radioactive in large volumes for several months until recirculating units could be put in place to repeatedly cool and re-use a limited quantity of water for cooling. The earthquake damage and flooding in the wake of the tsunami hindered external assistance. Electrical power was slowly restored for some of the reactors, allowing for automated cooling.[14]

Japanese officials initially assessed the accident as Level 4 on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES) despite the views of other international agencies that it should be higher. The level was later raised to 5 and eventually to 7, the maximum scale value.[15][16] The Japanese government and TEPCO have been criticized in the foreign press for poor communication with the public and improvised cleanup efforts.[17][18][19] On 20 March, the Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano announced that the plant would be decommissioned once the crisis was over.

The Japanese government estimates the total amount of radioactivity released into the atmosphere was approximately one-tenth as much as was released during the Chernobyl disaster.[20] Significant amounts of radioactive material have also been released into ground and ocean waters. Measurements taken by the Japanese government 30–50 km from the plant showed caesium-137 levels high enough to cause concern,[21] leading the government to ban the sale of food grown in the area. Tokyo officials temporarily recommended that tap water should not be used to prepare food for infants.[22][23] In May 2012, TEPCO reported that at least 900 PBq had been released "into the atmosphere in March last year [2011] alone" although it has been said staff may have been told to lie, and give false readings to try and cover up true levels of radiation.[24][25]

A few of the plant's workers were severely injured or killed by the disaster conditions resulting from the earthquake. There were no immediate deaths due to direct radiation exposures, but at least six workers have exceeded lifetime legal limits for radiation and more than 300 have received significant radiation doses. Predicted future cancer deaths due to accumulated radiation exposures in the population living near Fukushima have ranged from none[26] to 100[27] to a non-peer-reviewed "guesstimate"[28] of 1,000.[20] On 16 December 2011, Japanese authorities declared the plant to be stable, although it would take decades to decontaminate the surrounding areas and to decommission the plant altogether.[29] On 5 July 2012, the parliament appointed The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (NAIIC) submitted its inquiry report to the Japanese parliament,[30] while the government appointed Investigation Committee on the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company submitted its final report to the Japanese government on 23 July 2012.[31] Tepco admitted for the first time on October 12, 2012 that it had failed to take stronger measures to prevent disasters for fear of inviting lawsuits or protests against its nuclear plants.[32][33][34][35]

Unit 2 reactor[edit]

Failure of both Unit 2 diesel generators
Aerial view of the plant area in 1975, showing separation between Units 5 & 6, and the majority of the complex.
・Unit 6 : direction of Sōma.
・Unit 4 : direction of Iwaki.
Radiation measurements from Fukushima Daiichi NPP, March 2011
Seawater-contamination along coast with caesium-137, from 21 March until 5 May (Source: GRS)
Measured dosis at NPP border area from 12. up to 17. March

Unit 2 was operating at the time of the earthquake and experienced the same controlled initial shutdown as the other units.[36] As with unit 1, the reactor scrammed following the earthquake. The two diesel generators came online and initially all cooling systems were available. Initially the high pressure coolant injection (HPCI) system was primary cooling the core and at 15:00 operators activated the residual heat removal system main pump and the containment vessel spray pump at 15:07 to cool the suppression pool; all these systems failed following both AC power and DC power loss after the tsunami as the diesel generators and other systems failed when the tsunami overran the plant. The reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) system was manually activated by operators at 15:39 following power loss, but by midnight the status of the reactor was unclear; some monitoring equipment was still operating on temporary power.[37] The coolant level was stable and preparations were underway to reduce pressure in the reactor containment vessel should it become necessary, though TEPCO did not state in press releases what these preparations were, and the government had been advised that this might happen.[38] The RCIC was reported by TEPCO to have shut down around 19:00 JST on 12 March, but reported to be operating again as of 09:00 JST 13 March.[39] The pressure reduction of the reactor containment vessel commenced before midnight on 12 March[40] although the IAEA reported that as of 13:15 JST 14 March, that according to information supplied to them, no venting had taken place at the plant.[3] A report in The New York Times suggested that plant officials initially concentrated efforts on a damaged fuel storage pool at Unit 2, diverting attention from problems arising at the other reactors, but that incident was not reported in official press releases.[41] The IAEA reported that on 14 March at 09:30, the RCIC was still operating and that power was being provided by a mobile generator.[3] By midday on 19 March grid power had been connected to the existing transformer at Unit 2 and work continued to connect the transformer to the new distribution panel installed in a nearby building.[42] Outside electricity became available at 15:46 JST on 20 March, but equipment still had to be repaired and reconnected.[43]

Cooling problems[edit]

On 14 March, TEPCO reported the shutdown of the RCIC system presumably due to low reactor pressure. Operators had for days taken measures to prevent the reactor pressure from dropping below the level at which the RCIC can operate to keep it running as long as possible. The system was never designed to be used for an extended period.[44] Fuel rods had been fully exposed for 140 minutes and there was a risk of a core meltdown.[45] Reactor water level indicators were reported to be showing minimum-possible values at 19:30 JST on 14 March.[46]

At 22:29 JST, workers had succeeded in refilling half the reactor with water but parts of the rods were still exposed, and technicians could not rule out the possibility that some had melted. It was hoped that holes blown in the walls of reactor building 2 by the earlier blast from Unit 3 would allow the escape of hydrogen vented from the reactor and prevent a similar explosion.[45] At 21:37 JST, the measured dose rates at the gate of the plant reached a maximum of 3.13 mSv/h, which was enough to reach the annual limit for non-nuclear workers in twenty minutes,[45] but had fallen back to 0.326 mSv/h by 22:35.[47]

It was believed that around 23:00 JST, the 4 m long fuel rods in the reactor were fully exposed for the second time.[45][48] At 00:30 JST on 15 March, NHK ran a live press conference with TEPCO stating that the water level had sunk under the rods once again and pressure in the vessel was raised. The utility said that the hydrogen explosion at Unit 3 might have caused a glitch in the cooling system of Unit 2: Four out of five water pumps being used to cool the Unit 2 reactor had failed after the explosion at Unit 3. In addition, the last pump had briefly stopped working when its fuel ran out.[49][50] To replenish the water, the contained pressure would have to be lowered first by opening a valve of the vessel. The unit's air flow gauge was accidentally turned off and, with the gauge turned off, flow of water into the reactor was blocked leading to full exposure of the rods. As of 04:11 JST on 15 March, water was being pumped into the reactor of Unit 2 again.[51]

At Thursday 23 June Tepco-workers entered the building of reactor 2, to install a provisional gauge for measuring the water level inside the reactor. The original device was damaged in March. Next Saturday 25 June Tepco reported, that it was still not possible to obtain accurate data on the water level and pressure of this reactor. The temperature near the containment vessel is very high, because of this the gauge did not function properly: the water inside the tubes of the gauge was evaporated.[52]

It was later revealed that workers were minutes from restoring power to the standby liquid control (SLC) system pumps in unit 2 as a way to inject borated water once the RCIC shut down and had spent hours laying cable from a generator truck to the unit 2 power center when the unit 1 explosion occurred. This damaged the cable preventing this method from being used. It is possible this system could have prevented a complete meltdown as it took hours after the explosion until injection using fire trucks could be started.[53]

Explosion[edit]

An explosion was heard after 06:14 JST[54] on 15 March in Unit 2, possibly damaging the pressure-suppression system, which is at the bottom part of the containment vessel.[55][56] The radiation level was reported to exceed the legal limit and the plant's operator started to evacuate all non-essential workers from the plant.[57] Only a minimum crew of 50 men, also referred to as the Fukushima 50, was left at the site.[58] Soon after, radiation equivalent dose rates had risen to 8.2 mSv/h[59] around two hours after the explosion and again down to 2.4 mSv/h, shortly after.[60] Three hours after the explosion, the rates had risen to 11.9 mSv/h.[61]

While admitting that the suppression pool at the bottom of the containment vessel had been damaged in the explosion, causing a drop of pressure there, Japanese nuclear authorities emphasized that the containment had not been breached as a result of the explosion and contained no obvious holes.[62] In a news conference on 15 March the director general of the IAEA, Yukiya Amano, said that there was a "possibility of core damage" at Unit 2 of less than 5%.[63] Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) stated 33% of the fuel rods were damaged, in news reports the morning of 16 March.[64] On 30 March, NISA reiterated concerns about a possible Unit 2 breach at either the suppression pool, or the reactor vessel.[65] NHK World reported the NISA's concerns as "air may be leaking", very probably through "weakened valves, pipes and openings under the reactors where the control rods are inserted", but that "there is no indication of large cracks or holes in the reactor vessels".[65]

On 8 November workers did enter reactor-building no. 4, and inspected the place to determine the cause of the hydrogen-blast on 15 March 2011. They found the 5th floor more severely damaged compared with the 4th floor, where the spent fuel pool was located. The fuel itself was found undamaged. The workers also found a severely damaged air conditioning duct on floor 5. These findings did not support earlier assumptions that the hydrogen in the blast originated from the spent fuel pool of reactor 4, but instead proved that the explosion was caused by hydrogen from the number 3 reactor, after the valves were opened. The hydrogen reached the fifth floor of reactor building 4 through the aforementioned damaged air conditioning duct.[66][67]

Spent fuel pool[edit]

From 20 March, seawater was added to the spent fuel pool[43] via the Fuel Pool Cooling (FPC) line.[68] Fresh water was used from 29 March.[68]

On 31 May, the spent fuel pool was switched from the water-injection system, to a circulatory cooling system.[68]

Containment damage[edit]

Unit 2 was considered the most likely unit to have a damaged reactor containment vessel, as of 24 March.[69] But images from a robotic inspection reveal superficial surface damage to pipework but show the outer surface of the torus to be in normal condition and the potential break points of the manhole covers intact.[70] On 27 March, TEPCO reported measurements of very high radiation levels, over 1000 mSv/h, in the basement of the Unit 2 turbine building, which officials reported was 10 million times higher than what would be found in the water of a normally functioning reactor. Hours into the media frenzy, the company retracted its report and stated that the figures were not credible.[71] "because the level was so high the worker taking the reading had to evacuate before confirming it with a second reading."[72] Shortly following the ensuing wave of media retractions that discredited the report worldwide, TEPCO clarified its initial retraction; the radiation from the pool surface in the basement of the Unit 2 turbine building was found to be "more than 1,000 millisieverts per hour", as originally reported, but the concentration of radioactive substances was 100,000 times higher than usual, not 10 million.[73]

Seawater used for cooling[edit]

At 20:05 JST on 14 March, the Japanese government ordered seawater to be injected into Unit 2 in a new effort to cool the reactor core. The treatment had been held as a last resort since it ruins the reactor. TEPCO started seawater cooling at 16:34.[74] From 26 March, freshwater was used to cool the core.[68]

Reactor stabilization[edit]

By 26 March 2011, electrical power (initially from temporary sources, off-site power starting 3 April) was restored to parts of the Unit, with the Main Control Room lighting being restored.[68]

On 28 March, the Nuclear Safety Commission announced its suspicion that radioactive materials had leaked from Unit 2 into water in trenches connecting Unit 2's buildings, leading TEPCO to reduce the amount of water pumped into the reactor because of fears that the water could leak into the sea.[75] The reduction in water pumping could have raised reactor temperatures.[76]

On 27 March, the IAEA reported temperatures at the bottom of the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) at Unit 2 fell to 97 °C (206.6 °F) from 100 °C (212 °F) on Saturday. Operators attempted to pump water from the turbine hall basement to the condenser,[77][78] but "both condensers turned out to be full."[79] Therefore, condenser water was first attempted to be pumped to storage tanks, freeing condenser storage for water currently in the basement of Unit 2.[79] The pumps now being used can move 10 to 25 tons of water per hour.[79] On 19 April 2011, TEPCO began transferring excess, radioactive cooling water from the reactor's basement and maintenance tunnels to a waste processing facility.[80]

On 18 April, remote control robot was used to enter the Reactor Building and performed a series of inspections.[74]

On 18 May, staff entered the Reactor Building for the first time since 15 March.[68]

On 11 June, ventilation systems were installed in the Reactor Building, to clean the highly radioactive air encapsulated within the Reactor Building.[68]

On 28 June, TEPCO began injecting nitrogen into the containment vessel, which was expected to reduce the likelihood of further hydrogen explosions.[68]

Since 2 July, the Reactor has been cooled using fresh water treated by the on site water treatment plant.[68]

On 14 September at 11AM (JST) TEPCO began injecting water into the No. 2 reactor using the core spray system piping in addition to the feed water piping already being used as this method seemed to be effective in reducing the temperature in the No. 3 reactor. At that time the temperature at the bottom of the No. 2 reactor was still 114.4 degrees Celsius (237.92 °F), compared to the 84.9 °C degrees(184.82 °F) in the No.1 reactor and the 101.3 °C (214.34 °F) in the No. 3 reactor. The new method has led to some temperature decrease, but not as significant as the decrease that occurred in the No.3 reactor.[81]

After some positive effect was noticed using both the core spray system and feed water piping, TEPCO decided on 16 September to increase the amount of water pumped into the No. 2 reactor by one ton, in an attempt to further lower the temperature in the core, to a total of 7 tons per hour. The same was done for reactor No. 3, where 5 tons were added, bring the total to 12 tons per hour. TEPCO also added that the volume of cooling water into the No. 1 reactor would be increased as necessary.[82]

On 21 September 2011, Masanori Naitoh, director in charge of nuclear safety analysis at the Institute of Applied Energy, an expert commenting on the plan to contain the crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, mentioned that the interior temperatures of the damaged reactors had to be checked to confirm cold-shutdown. Naitoh said that TEPCO was only measuring temperatures outside the reactors, and that the temperatures inside should be confirmed through simulation to confirm that they had fallen below 100 degrees, and that there were no risks of nuclear reactions recurring.[83]

In the first week of February 2012, temperatures inside reactor No. 2 became unstable. On 7 February, the amount of cooling water was increased from 10.5 tons to 13.5 tons per hour. After a slight initial decrease in temperature, sensor readings again showed the temperature rising at some locations in the bottom of the reactor. On 11 February, temperatures rose once again.[84][85][86][87] On 12 February, the temperature rose to 78.3 °C (172.94 °F). TEPCO denied the possibility of the core going critical again, because that would produce xenon, which was still below detectable levels. To prevent any possible nuclear criticality, TEPCO planned to dump boric acid into the reactor and to increase the volume of cooling water by 3 tons per hour.[88]

Since only one of the temperature-sensors showed fluctuating readings between 70 °C and 90 °C, TEPCO and NISA thought this sensor was malfunctioning. The sensor works on the principle of changing resistance between the surface of two different metals as the temperature changes. TEPCO planned measurements on this sensor.[vague] Since the radiation around reactor 2 could make it impossible to place new sensors inside the reactor vessel, the situation would become very serious if the other two sensors inside the reactor were to also fail. After that, it would be impossible to monitor the reactor. Kazuhiko Kudo, a professor of nuclear engineering at the university of Kyushu, Japan commented: "Because we haven't been able to grasp how the nuclear fuel in the cores has been distributed, it's impossible to rule out localized high temperature spots. As the high radiation rules out installing new temperature sensors, if the last two sensors fail, the situation will be much more serious indeed."[89][90][91] On 26 February, TEPCO sent a report to the Japanese government about the malfunctioning temperature-sensors and has since ceased monitoring that sensor. The other two temperature-sensors and the radiation levels inside the containment vessel would be used to monitor the state of the cold shutdown. The amount of cooling water would be lowered, after NISA's approval.[92]

On 15 April 2012, one of the two remaining temperature-sensors at the bottom of the No.2 reactor gave false readings, and because the electric resistance was found greatly increased, TEPCO concluded that it was broken, leaving only 18 of 36 temperature sensors still functioning. At 11 a.m., the remaining thermometer at this place measured 46.7 degrees Celsius.[93]

On 1 June 2012 TEPCO reported that another thermometer had malfunctioned, resulting in more than half of the temperature sensors, 23 out of 41, now being out of use in reactor No. 2., thus making it more problematic to monitor the state of "cold-shutdown". According to TEPCO, the high humidity in the reactor may be a contributing factor in the failure of the sensors. TEPCO stated that it is currently decontaminating the site and training workers to install new thermometers. The plan is to install new thermometers through pipes that are connected to the reactor. TEPCO stated that it plans to decontaminate the site and install the new thermometers by late July 2012.[94]

On 15 June 2012 TEPCO reported that a robot that was sent into the No. 2 reactor building on 13 June 2012 to take video images and radiation measurements, detected a reading of 880mSv (millisieverts) per hour of radiation on the fifth floor, which one floor (4.5 meters) directly above the reactor containment vessel. TEPCO suspects that during initial accident in March 2011, that radioactive substances leaked from the No. 2 reactor moved through the building, but after analyzing the images taken by the robot it could not find the exact route the radioactive substances traveled, and images taken by the robot found no major damage on the fifth floor. During the March 2011 nuclear accident the No. 2 reactor is believed to have released the largest amount of radioactive substances. But the overall route the radioactive material traveled has yet to be determined. TEPCO needs to find and repair the damaged parts of the reactor to recover melted nuclear fuel before TEPCO can begin the process of decommissioning the reactor. However high radiation often stops workers from entering the building. This scenario means it will take a long time to find the problems in the containment vessel.[95]

On 3 October 2012 TEPCO installed a new temperature-sensor inside reactor nr.2. The thermometer showed 42.6 degrees Celsius, another nearby the RPV bottom monitoring instrument (TE-2-3-69H3) indicated 46.1 degrees. At that moment only 1 out of the existing 5 sensors was functioning properly.[96] [97]

Pressure vessel damage[edit]

On 15 May, TEPCO revealed that the pressure vessel that holds nuclear fuel "is likely to be damaged and leaking water at Units 2 and 3", which means most of the thousands of tons of water pumped into the reactors had leaked.[98]

Meltdown[edit]

On 29 March, Richard Lahey, former head of safety research for boiling-water reactors at General Electric, speculated that the reactor core may have melted through the reactor containment vessel onto a concrete floor, raising concerns of a major release of radioactive material, while failing to divulge the report by Dale G. Bridenbaugh which condemned the design as "unsafe".[99] On 27 April, TEPCO revised its estimate of damaged fuel in Unit 2 from 30% to 35%.[100] TEPCO reported on 23 May that Reactor 2 suffered a meltdown about 100 hours after the earthquake.[101]

Concerns over re-criticality[edit]

On 1 November 2011 TEPCO said that xenon-133 and xenon-135 was detected in gas-samples taken from the containment vessel of reactor 2, in a concentration of 6 to 10 (or more) parts per million becquerels per cubic centimeter. Xenon-135 was also detected in gas samples collected on 2 November. These isotopes are the result of nuclear fission-reaction of uranium. Because the short half-lifes of these gases: (Xe-133: 5 days Xe-135: 9 hours), the presence could only mean that nuclear fissions were occurring at some places in the reactor. Boric-acid was poured into the reactor in an attempt to stop the fission-reactions. No significant change in temperature or pressure was found by TEPCO, so there was no sign of large-scale criticality. The reactor-cooling was continued, but TEPCO would examine the situation at reactor 1 and 3 also.[102][103][104][105] Professor Koji Okamoto of the University of Tokyo Graduate School made the comment that localized and temporary fission might still happen, and that the melted fuel could undergo fission, but the fuel was probably scattered around. Neutrons from radioactive materials could react with the uranium fuel and other substances. Self-sustaining chain reactions were unlikely, thanks to the huge amounts of boric acid that were poured into the reactor. According to Okamoto, these neutrons should be closely monitored to make sure fission did not happen, because when the fission-reactions were not controlled, it would be impossible to reach a state of "cold-shutdown". Therefore it was needed to locate all molten fuel in and outside the reactor-vessel.[103][106]

On 3 November 2011 TEPCO said that the tiny amounts of xenon-135 detected in the reactor's containment vessel atmosphere came from spontaneous nuclear fission with curium-242 and curium-244, substances that were present in the nuclear fuel. A critical fission would have caused much higher concentrations of xenon isotopes. These reactions would occur constantly, and did not lead to criticality in the melted fuel of reactor 2. All assessments would be sent to NISA for reevaluation.[107][108][109]

The detection of xenon on the afternoon of 1 November by TEPCO was reported to NISA in the night. The next day, 2 November just past 7 a.m., NISA informed the Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda's secretary about the possibility of critical reactions in reactor 2. Two hours later at 9 a.m. prime minister Edano learned the news. At a press-conference, the Chief Cabinet Secretary Osamu Fujimura revealed that Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Yukio Edano sent a strong reprimand to Hiroyuki Fukano, the chief of NISA, because NISA failed to report the incident immediately to both himself and the Prime Minister's Office, and that NISA waited almost a day after the find was done. Fujimura said, "I have been told that NISA decided not to report the incident until the following morning because the agency didn't believe it was a dangerous situation."[110]

Radioactive pollution of groundwater[edit]

On 27 July 2013 was announced that extremely high levels of tritium and cesium were found in a pit containing about 5000 cubic meters water on the seaside of the unit 2 reactor building. 8.7 million becquerels/liter Tritium was found and 2.35 billion becquerels/liter cesium. The NRA was concerned that leaks from this place could cause the high tritium levels in sea, and that there was still water flowing from the reactor into the turbine building into the pit. But TEPCO thought that this pollution was there from the first days in 2011, and stayed there. Nevertheless TEPCO would control the site for leaks, and seal the soil around the pit.[111]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Negishi, Mayumi (12 April 2011). "Japan raises nuclear crisis severity to highest level". Reuters. 
  2. ^ "Fukushima accident upgraded to severity level 7". IEEE Spectrum. 12 April 2011. 
  3. ^ a b c "IAEA Update on Japan Earthquake". Retrieved 16 March 2011. As reported earlier, a 400 millisieverts (mSv) per hour radiation dose observed at Fukushima Daiichi occurred between 1s 3 and 4. This is a high dose-level value, but it is a local value at a single location and at a certain point in time. The IAEA continues to confirm the evolution and value of this dose rate. It should be noted that because of this detected value, non-indispensable staff was evacuated from the plant, in line with the Emergency Response Plan, and that the population around the plant is already evacuated. 
  4. ^ "Radiation-exposed workers to be treated at Chiba hospital". Kyodo News. 25 March 2011. Retrieved 17 April 2011. 
  5. ^ "Japan's unfolding disaster 'bigger than Chernobyl'". New Zealand Herald. 2 April 2011. 
  6. ^ "Explainer: What went wrong in Japan's nuclear reactors". IEEE Spectrum. 4 April 2011. 
  7. ^ "Analysis: A month on, Japan nuclear crisis still scarring" International Business Times (Australia). 9 April 2011, retrieved 12 April 2011; excerpt, According to James Acton, Associate of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, "Fukushima is not the worst nuclear accident ever but it is the most complicated and the most dramatic...This was a crisis that played out in real time on TV. Chernobyl did not."
  8. ^ Black, Richard (15 March 2011). "Reactor breach worsens prospects". BBC Online. Retrieved 23 March 2011. 
  9. ^ F. Tanabe, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2011, volume 48, issue 8, pages 1135 to 1139
  10. ^ "3 nuclear reactors melted down after quake, Japan confirms". CNN. 7 June 2011. Retrieved 13 July 2011. 
  11. ^ "'Melt-through' at Fukushima? / Govt report to IAEA suggests situation worse than meltdown". Yomiuri. 8 June 2011. Retrieved 8 June 2011. 
  12. ^ "Fukushima nuclear accident update log, updates of 15 March 2011". IAEA. 15 March 2011. Retrieved 8 May 2011. 
  13. ^ Hydrogen explosions Fukushima nuclear plant: what happened?
  14. ^ Stricken reactors may get power Sunday, The Wall Street Journal, 19 March 2011
  15. ^ Justin McCurry. Japan raises nuclear alert level to seven. The Guardian. 12 April 2011
  16. ^ 'Now radiation in Japan is as bad as radiation level is raised to 7 for only the second time in history' Daily Mail 12 April 2011.
  17. ^ Wagner, Wieland (15 March 2011). "Problematic public relations: Japanese leaders leave people in the dark". Der Spiegel. Retrieved 19 March 2011. 
  18. ^ "China urges Japan's openness amid panic buying of salt". Channel NewsAsia. Agence France-Presse. 17 March 2011. Retrieved 17 March 2011. 
  19. ^ Veronika Hackenbroch, Cordula Meyer and Thilo Thielke (5 April 2011). "A hapless Fukushima clean-up effort". Der Spiegel. 
  20. ^ a b Frank N. von Hippel (September/October 2011 vol. 67 no. 5). "The radiological and psychological consequences of the Fukushima Daiichi accident". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. pp. 27–36.  Check date values in: |date= (help)
  21. ^ "Caesium fallout from Fukushima rivals Chernobyl". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 30 March 2011. Retrieved 30 March 2011. 
  22. ^ Japan mulls Fukushima food ban: IAEA, Reuters, 19 March 2011
  23. ^ Justin McCurry in Osaka (23 March 2010). "Tokyo water unsafe for infants after high radiation levels detected". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 23 March 2011. 
  24. ^ "TEPCO puts radiation release early in Fukushima crisis at 900 PBq". Kyodo News. 24 May 2012. Retrieved 24 May 2012. 
  25. ^ Kevin Krolicki (24 May 2012). "Fukushima radiation higher than first estimated". Reuters. Retrieved 24 May 2012. 
  26. ^ "Trauma, Not Radiation, Is Key Concern In Japan". NPR. 2012-03-09. Retrieved 2012-04-15. 
  27. ^ Caracappa, Peter F. (28 June 2011), "Fukushima Accident: Radioactive Releases and Potential Dose Consequences" (PDF), ANS Annual Meeting, retrieved 13 September 2011 
  28. ^ "The Cost of Fear: The Framing of a Fukushima Report". 2012-03-15. Retrieved 2012-04-15. 
  29. ^ "Japan PM says Fukushima nuclear site finally stabilised". BBC Online. 16 December 2011. Retrieved 7 January 2012. 
  30. ^ National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. "国会事故調 | 東京電力福島原子力発電所事故調査委員会のホームページ". National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. Retrieved 9 July 2012. 
  31. ^ "UPDATE: Government panel blasts lack of 'safety culture' in nuclear accident". The Asahi Shimbun. 23 July 2012. Retrieved 29 July 2012. 
  32. ^ Fackler, Martin (12 October 2012). "Japan Power Company Admits Failings on Plant Precautions". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 October 2012. 
  33. ^ Sheldrick, Aaron (12 October 2012). "Fukushima operator must learn from mistakes, new adviser says". Reuters. Retrieved 13 October 2012. 
  34. ^ Yamaguchi, Mari (12 October 2012). "Japan utility agrees nuclear crisis was avoidable". Associated Press. Boston.com. Retrieved 13 October 2012. 
  35. ^ "Japanese nuclear plant operator admits playing down risk". CNN Wire Staff. CNN. 12 October 2012. Retrieved 13 October 2012. 
  36. ^ World Nuclear News (12 March 2011). "Battle to stabilise earthquake reactors". World Nuclear News. Retrieved 12 March 2011. 
  37. ^ "Press Release | Plant Status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (as of 0 am 12 March)". TEPCO (Press release). 12 March 2011. Retrieved 23 March 2011. 
  38. ^ "Press Release | Plant Status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (as of 11 pm 12 March)". TEPCO (Press release). 12 March 2011. Retrieved 23 March 2011. 
  39. ^ "Press Release | Plant status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (as of 8 pm 12 March)". TEPCO (Press release). 12 March 2011. Retrieved 23 March 2011. 
  40. ^ "Press Release | Plant Status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (as of 0 pm 13 March)". TEPCO (Press release). 13 March 2011. Retrieved 23 March 2011. 
  41. ^ Broad, William J.; Tabuchi, Hiroko (14 March 2011). "In stricken fuel-cooling pools, a danger for the longer Term". The New York Times. Retrieved 14 March 2011. 
  42. ^ "Press Release | Plant Status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (as of 0:00 pm 19 Mar)". TEPCO (Press release). Retrieved 23 March 2011. 
  43. ^ a b "Seismic Damage Information (the 38th Release)" (PDF). Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency. 21 March 2011. Retrieved 12 April 2011. 
  44. ^ "TEPCO press release 3". Tepco (Press release). 14 March 2011. 
  45. ^ a b c d "Crisis continues at Fukushima nuclear plant as fuel rods exposed again". Kyodo News. Retrieved 23 March 2011. 
  46. ^ "Seismic Damage Information (the 23rd Release)" (PDF). Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency. 14 March 2011. Retrieved 12 April 2011. 
  47. ^ "Tepco Fears Fuel Rods Melt, Fights to Stabilize Stricken Reactor". Bloomberg BusinessWeek. 14 March 2011. Retrieved 15 March 2011. 
  48. ^ "Fuel rods fully exposed again at Fukushima nuclear power plant". Xinhuanet. 14 March 2011. 
  49. ^ Vastag, Brian (28 February 2011). "Nuclear crisis deepens as third reactor loses cooling capacity". The Washington Post. Retrieved 15 March 2011. 
  50. ^ Maugh II, Thomas H. (14 March 2011). "Risk of meltdown increases at Japan nuclear reactor". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 21 March 2011. 
  51. ^ "Tokyo Elec resumes work to pump water into No.2 reactor-Kyodo". Reuters. 14 March 2011. 
  52. ^ NHK-World (25 June 2011) TEPCO unable to gauge No.2 reactor water level
  53. ^ TEPCO (10 August 2011) Chronology of Events at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station.
  54. ^ Hiroko Tabuchi, Keith Bradsher, Matt Wald (14 March 2011). "Japan Faces Prospect of Nuclear Catastrophe as Workers Leave Plant". The New York Times. 
  55. ^ "Urgent: Blast heard at Fukushima's No.2 reactor: gov't ; Kyodo News". english.kyodonews.jp. 2011. Retrieved 14 March 2011. The sound of a blast was heard Tuesday morning at the troubled No. 2 reactor of the quake-hit Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, the government said. The incident occurred at 6:10 am and is feared to have damaged the reactor's pressure-suppression system, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said, citing a report from the plant's operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. 
  56. ^ "Japanese nuclear safety agency says explosion heard at Unit 2 of Fukushima Dai-ichi plant Canadian Business Online". canadianbusiness.com. 2011. Retrieved 14 March 2011. 
  57. ^ "Blast heard at Fukushima's No.2 reactor: gov't". Retrieved 14 March 2011. Shortly after the 6:10 am incident, the radiation level exceeded the legal limit and reached 965.5 microsievert per hour (about 1 millisievert per hour), and it was feared that the reactor's pressure-suppression system was damaged, according to the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency. Tokyo Electric Power Co., the plant's operator, said it was evacuating workers from the plant, except for those necessary for the work to cool the reactor. 
  58. ^ Tabuchi, Hiroko; Sanger, David E.; Bradsher, Keith (14 March 2011). "Japan Faces Potential Nuclear Disaster as Radiation Levels Rise". The New York Times. 
  59. ^ "URGENT: Radiation shoots up at Fukushima nuke plant after blast heard". Kyodo News. Retrieved 15 March 2011. 
  60. ^ NHK, 15 March 2011.
  61. ^ "Japanese Government Warns that New Radiation Leak is Harmful to Health | Cleveland Leader". clevelandleader.com. 2011. Retrieved 15 March 2011. 
  62. ^ 15 March 2011, Plant operator says reactor seal apparently not holed, Channel News Asia. Agence France-Presse.
  63. ^ "UN atom chief sees possible Japan plant core damage". Reuters. 11 March 2011. Retrieved 15 March 2011. 
  64. ^ Hall, Kenji; Williams, Carol J. (27 February 2011). "Japan earthquake: Fire erupts again at Fukushima Daiichi reactor; nuclears rods damaged at other reactors". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 18 March 2011. 
  65. ^ a b "Air may be leaking from reactors No. 2 and 3". NHK WORLD English. 30 March 2011. Retrieved 2 June 2011. 
  66. ^ NHK-world (10 November 2011) TEPCO: hydrogen from reactor caused blast
  67. ^ JAIF (11 November 2011) Earthquake-report 262
  68. ^ a b c d e f g h i "Records from March 11, 2011 to 31 July 2011" (PDF). TEPCO (Press release). Retrieved 22 August 2011. 
  69. ^ "Status report: Reactor-by-reactor at the Fukushima Daiichi plant". CNN. 24 March 2011. Retrieved 26 March 2011. 
  70. ^ "Inspection sheds light on Fukushima torus". World Nuclear Association. 24 April 2012. 
  71. ^ Japanese nuclear firm admits error on radiation reading The Guardian, 27 March 2011.
  72. ^ Worthington, Mark (27 March 2011). "Japan nuclear crisis: Radiation spike report 'mistaken'". BBC. Retrieved 27 March 2011. 
  73. ^ "Woes deepen over radioactive water at nuke plant, sea contamination". Kyodo News Network. 28 March 2011. Retrieved 27 March 2011. 
  74. ^ a b "Information on Status of Nuclear Power Plants in Fukushima" (PDF). JAIF. Retrieved 22 August 2011. 
  75. ^ "TEPCO faces challenge in cooling reactor". .nhk.or.jp. 29 March 2011. Retrieved 7 April 2011. [dead link]
  76. ^ Morse, Andrew (3 February 2011). "At Japanese nuclear plant, a choice between bad, worse". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 12 April 2011. 
  77. ^ "Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident Update (27 March, 03:00 UTC)". International Atomic Energy Agency. 27 March 2011. Retrieved 27 March 2011.
  78. ^ Staff (24 March 2007). "Official: Workers touched water with radiation 10,000 times normal". CNN Wire. Retrieved 27 March 2011. 
  79. ^ a b c TEPCO halts work to remove radioactive water, NHK WORLD English (30 March 2011). Retrieved 30 April 2011.
  80. ^ NHK, "Transfer of highly contaminated water begins", 19 April 2011.
  81. ^ JAIF (15 September 2011) Earthquake report 205: TEPCO spraying water directly into No.2 reactor
  82. ^ JAIF (16 September 2011) Earthquake report 207: TEPCO injects more water in two reactors
  83. ^ JAIF (21 September 2011) Earthquake-report 212: Expert urges checks of reactor interiors
  84. ^ JAIF (NHK-world)(11 February 2012) Earthquake-report 345: Temperature inside No.2 reactor rises again
  85. ^ The Mainichi Daily news( 8 February 2012) Fukushima No. 2 reactor cools slightly after increased water injection
  86. ^ NHK-world (8 February 2012) Temperature decreasing inside Fukushima reactor[dead link]
  87. ^ JAIF (7 February 2012) Earthquake report 340
  88. ^ NHK-world (12 February 2012)Temperature rising at No.2 reactor
  89. ^ The Mainichi Daily News (n) 13 February 2012)Possible sensor failure throws Fukushima reactor temp. data into doubt
  90. ^ JAIF (13 February 2012)Earthquake report 346: TEPCO carefully monitoring No.2 reactor
  91. ^ JAIF (13 February 2012)Earthquake report 346:One reading of Fukushima reactor exceeds 80 C
  92. ^ TEPCO reports reactor thermometer problem to govt[dead link] 16 February 2012
  93. ^ The Japan Times (15 April 2012) Another thermometer breaks at Fukushima
  94. ^ JAIF (4 June 2012) Earthquake-report 435: Thermometers malfunctioning at No.2 reactor
  95. ^ JAIF (15 June 2012) Earthquake. report 444: High radiation one floor above reactor
  96. ^ NHK-world (4 October 2012) Fukushima plant's reactor No.2 has new thermometer
  97. ^ TEPCO (3 October 2012) Daily Report as of 4:00 PM, 3 October)
  98. ^ Mitsuru Obe (16 May 2011). "Cores damaged at three reactors". The Wall Street Journal. 
  99. ^ Sample, Ian (29 March 2011). "Japan may have lost race to save nuclear reactor". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 30 March 2011. 
  100. ^ TEPCO revises nuclear fuel damage ratios, NHK, 27 April 2011
  101. ^ "Tepco confirms extra partial fuel rod meltdown at plant". BBC. 24 May 2011. Retrieved 27 May 2011. 
  102. ^ NHK-world (2 November 2011) TEPCO: Reactor may have gone critical
  103. ^ a b JAIF (2 November 2011) Earthuake-report 253
  104. ^ The Mainichi Daily News (2 November 2011) TEPCO finds sign of fresh nuclear fission at Fukushima reactor[dead link]
  105. ^ Businessweek (2 November 2011)[dead link]
  106. ^ NHK-world (2 November 2011) Xenon suggests possible nuclear fission
  107. ^ NHK-world (3 November 2011) TEPCO retracts criticality call
  108. ^ JAIF (3 November 2011)Earthquake-report 255
  109. ^ The Mainichi Daily News (4 November 2011) Xenon at Fukushima not result of 'critical' nuclear reactions: TEPCO[dead link]
  110. ^ The Mainichi Daily News (3 November 2011)Minister reprimands NISA chief for tardy reporting of xenon detection at Fukushima plant[dead link]
  111. ^ The Asahi Shimbun (28 July 2013) Extremely high tritium level found in water in pit at Fukushima plant

External links[edit]