General Transit Feed Specification
|Initial release||27 September 2006|
|Type of format||Transit schedule format|
|Standard||De facto standard|
|Open format?||Yes, CC BY 3.0|
- 1 History
- 2 Applications
- 3 Structure
- 4 See also
- 5 References
- 6 External links
What was to become GTFS started out as a side project of Google employee Chris Harrelson in 2005, who “monkeyed around with ways to incorporate transit data into Google Maps […] when he heard from Tim and Bibiana McHugh, married IT managers at TriMet, the transit agency for Portland, Ore[gon]”. McHugh is cited with being frustrated about finding transit directions in unfamiliar cities, while popular mapping services were already offering easy-to-use driving directions at the time.
Bibiana and Tim McHugh eventually got into contact with Google and provided the company with CSV exports of TriMet's schedule data. In December 2005, Portland became the first city to be featured in the first version of Google's “Transit Trip Planner”. In September 2006, five more US cities were added to the Google Transit Trip Planner, and the data format released as the Google Transit Feed Specification.
In the United States, there had not been any standard for public transit timetables prior to the advent of GTFS, not even a de facto standard. According to long-time BART website manager Timothy Moore, before the advent of GTFS, BART had to provide different data consumers with different formats, making a standardized transit format very desirable. The publicly and freely available format specification, as well as the availability of GTFS schedules, quickly made developers base their transit-related software on the format. This resulted in “hundreds of useful and popular transit applications” as well as catalogues listing available GTFS feeds. Due to the common data format those applications adhere to, solutions do not need to be custom-tailored to one transit operator, but can easily be extended to any region where a GTFS feed is available.
Due to the wide use of the format, the “Google” part of the original name was seen as a misnomer “that makes some potential users shy away from adopting GTFS”. As a consequence, it was proposed to change the name of the specification to General Transit Feed Specification in 2009.
GTFS is typically used to supply data on public transit for use in multi-modal journey planner applications. In most cases, GTFS is combined with a detailed representation of the street/pedestrian network to allow routing to take place from point to point rather than just between stops. OpenTripPlanner is an open-source software that can do journey planning with a combination of GTFS and OpenStreetMap data. Other general purpose applications exist such as the ArcMap Network Analyst extension which can incorporate GTFS for transit routing.
GTFS was originally designed for use in Google Transit, an online multi-modal journey planning application.
Comparing service levels
GTFS has been used to measure changes in accessibility due to changes in transit service provision, either actual or proposed. Analysis of changes in service over time can be accomplished by simply comparing published GTFS data for the same agency from different time periods. For comparison of existing service with proposed infrastructure or service changes, a future GTFS must often be constructed by hand based on proposed service characteristics.
A GTFS feed is a collection of at least six, and up to 13 CSV files (with extension .txt) contained within a .zip file. Preferred character encoding is UTF-8. Together, the related CSV tables describe a transit system's scheduled operations as visible to riders. The specification is designed to be sufficient to provide trip planning functionality, but is also useful for other applications such as analysis of service levels and some general performance measures. In contrast to European transit industry exchange standards such as Transmodel or VDV-45X, GTFS only includes scheduled operations that are meant to be distributed to riders. It is also limited to scheduled information and does not include real-time information. However, real-time information can be related to GTFS schedules according to the related GTFS-realtime specification.
Following are descriptions of the tables required for a valid GTFS data feed. Each table is literally a text CSV file whose filename is the name of the table, suffixed by '.txt'. So for the 'agency' table below, a CSV file called 'agency.txt' would be included in a valid GTFS feed.
The agency table provides information about the transit agency as such, including name, website and contact information.
The routes table identifies distinct routes. This is to be distinguished from distinct routings, several of which may belong to a single route.
- route_id (primary key)
- trip_id (primary key)
- route_id (foreign key)
- service_id (foreign key)
- block_id - The block ID indicates the schedule block to which a trip belongs.
- stop_id (primary key)
- trip_id (foreign key)
Note that dwell time may be modelled by the difference between the arrival and departure times. However, many agencies do not seem to model dwell time for most stops.
The stops table defines the geographic locations of each and every actual stop or station in the transit system as well as, and optionally, some of the amenities associated with those stops.
- stop_id (primary key)
The calendar table defines service patterns that operate recurrently such as, for example, every weekday. Service patterns that don't repeat such as for a one-time special event will be defined in the calendar_dates table.
- service_id (primary key)
Rules for drawing lines on a map to represent a transit organization's routes.
Headway (time between trips) for routes with variable frequency of service.
Rules for making connections at transfer points between routes.
- Roush, Wade (2012). "Welcome to Google transit: How (and why) the search giant is remapping public transportation" (PDF). Community Transportation: 3.
- Dyson, Lauren; Goldstein, Brett; Nemani, Abhi (2013). Beyond Transparency. Code for America Press. pp. 125–135.
- Garg, Avichal. "Public Transit via Google". Official Google Blog. Retrieved 14 March 2016.
- Harrelson, Chris. "Happy Trails with Google Transit". Official Google Blog. Retrieved 14 March 2016.
- Hughes, Joe. "proposal: remove "Google" from the name of GTFS". General Transit Feed Spec Changes. Google Groups. Retrieved 14 March 2016.
- "Home | OpenTripPlanner". www.opentripplanner.org. Retrieved 2017-05-12.
- "Yay, transit! - Using GTFS Data in ArcGIS Network Analyst". transit.melindamorang.com. Retrieved 2017-05-12.
- Farber, Steven; Morang, Melinda Z.; Widener, Michael J. (2014-09-01). "Temporal variability in transit-based accessibility to supermarkets". Applied Geography. 53: 149–159. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.012.
- Fransen, Koos; Neutens, Tijs; Farber, Steven; De Maeyer, Philippe; Deruyter, Greet; Witlox, Frank (2015-10-01). "Identifying public transport gaps using time-dependent accessibility levels". Journal of Transport Geography. 48: 176–187. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.09.008.
- Farber, Steven; Fu, Liwei (2017-03-01). "Dynamic public transit accessibility using travel time cubes: Comparing the effects of infrastructure (dis)investments over time". Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 62: 30–40. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.10.005.
- Farber, Steven; Grandez, Maria (2017). "Transit Accessibility, Land Development and Socioeconomic Priority: A Typology of Planned Station Catchment Areas in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area" (PDF). Journal of Transport and Land Use. (note: forthcoming edition).
- "What is GTFS-realtime?". Google Developers. Google.
- This article contains excerpts from "Opening Public Transit Data in Germany" by Stefan Kaufmann, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license.