Gabriel Over the White House

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Gabriel Over the White House
Gabriel Over the White House.jpg
Directed byGregory La Cava
Screenplay byCarey Wilson
Bertram Bloch
Based onGabriel over the White House: A Novel of the Presidency
1933 novel
by T.F. Tweed
Produced byWalter Wanger
William Randolph Hearst
StarringWalter Huston
Karen Morley
Franchot Tone
CinematographyBert Glennon
Edited byBasil Wrangell
Music byWilliam Axt
Distributed byMetro-Goldwyn Mayer
Release date
March 31, 1933
Running time
86 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$232,400[1]

Gabriel Over the White House is a 1933 American pre-Code political fantasy film starring Walter Huston as a genial but politically corrupt U.S. President who has a near-fatal automobile accident and comes under divine influence—specifically the Archangel Gabriel and the spirit of Abraham Lincoln. Eventually he takes control of the government, solves the problems of the nation, from unemployment to racketeering, and arranges for worldwide peace, before dying of a heart attack.

The film received the financial backing and creative input of businessman William Randolph Hearst. It was directed by Gregory La Cava, produced by Walter Wanger[2] and written by Carey Wilson based upon the novel Rinehard: A Melodrama of the Nineteen-Thirties (1933) by Thomas Frederic Tweed. Tweed did not receive screen credit (the film's opening credits say "based on the anonymous novel, Gabriel Over the White House") but he was credited in the copyright information. The supporting cast features Karen Morley, Franchot Tone, C. Henry Gordon, and David Landau.

Plot[edit]

Amiable—and thoroughly corrupt—U.S. President 'Judd' Hammond (Walter Huston) tells his new secretary Harley “Beek” Beekman (Franchot Tone) that two people may be admitted to his presence at any time: his young nephew Jimmie (Dickie Moore) and Miss Pendola (Pendie) Molloy (Karen Morley). Pendie is the President's mistress—and Beek's assistant.

At the first press conference, a reporter asks if Hammond will meet with John Bronson (David Landau). Hammond doesn't know who that is—Beekman prompts him. Bronson is leading a march to Washington of a million men wanting work. Hammond is glib until one young reporter (Mischa Auer) details the collapse of American democracy; he waffles and refuses to be quoted.

Hammond laughs as he uses the pen with which Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation to sign a bill for sewers in Puerto Rico. Bronson speaks eloquently on the radio while Hammond plays with his nephew.

After Hammond crashes his car, Dr. Eastman (Samuel Hinds) declares him “beyond any human help.” A breeze ruffles the curtains; the bed is briefly flooded with light. The President says “The doctors are wrong: Judd Hammond isn’t going to die.” Weeks later, Eastman confides in Beekman and Molloy: The supposedly comatose President is perfectly well, but is a changed man who sits silently, reading and thinking, “like a gaunt gray ghost...” The President withdraws from Pendie.

“I suggest you read the Constitution of the United States. You’ll find the President has some power,” he warns his Cabinet. Racketeer Nick Diamond (C. Henry Gordon) tries in vain to bribe and threaten Hammond.

Bronson is killed in a drive-by shooting, but the marchers carry on. In Baltimore, the President walks into the crowd alone and tells Alice Bronson (Jean Parker) that her father was a martyr who died trying “to arouse the stupid, lazy people of the United States to force their government to do something before everybody slowly starves to death.” He promises to create an Army of Construction. “The way he thinks is so simple and honest that it sounds a little crazy,” Beek says. “And If he’s mad, it’s a divine madness...” Pendie adds.

That night, the bewildered President doesn't recognize the manuscript for his speech to Congress. Light blooms outside the window... Hammond seems to listen, then straightens, confidently. “There was something in the room that made me shiver,” a shaken Pendie tells Beek. Since the accident, they have both felt that the President was two men. “What if God sent the Angel Gabriel to do for Judd Hammond what he did for Daniel?” she asks.

The President fires the Cabinet and forces Congress to adjourn, declaring that if he is a dictator, it is a dictatorship based on Jefferson's idea of democracy: the greatest good for the greatest number. He broadcasts his plans: an end to foreclosures, a National Banking Law, aid for 55 million agricultural workers, attack racketeering. He has already repealed Prohibition.

The first U.S. Government Liquor Store is bombed, and machine-gun fire rakes the White House, gravely wounding Pendie just as she and Beekman are about to confess their love. The President makes Beekman head of the new Federal Police. Diamond believes his lawyer will get him off, but the trial is a court martial. The racketeers are executed.

Hammond holds a worldwide radio broadcast demonstrating the power of his new United States Navy of the Air. Disarmament will free the billions wasted on obsolete weaponry. “...the next war will depopulate the Earth... Shall we save this world..?” he asks the people of the world. The President signs The Washington Covenant, using the Lincoln quill, and collapses. Pendie is alone with him. The light on his face changes, evoking an image of Lincoln. The shadows disappear. “Hello, Pendie old girl...Does the President of the United States meet with your approval?” he asks, feebly. “He’s proved himself one of the greatest men who ever lived,” she replies. “Hold my hand, Pendie.” Again, the light at the window. Pendie feels him go; the curtains stir again. Beek and Pendie come out, arm in arm to announce the President is dead. Outside, the flag is lowered to half-staff, to the last notes of "Taps".

Cast[edit]

Thomas A. Curran the early American silent film star plays an uncredited bit part.

Production[edit]

Production began in February 1932. Gabriel over the White House was released on March 31, 1933, with a run time of 85 to 87 minutes.[3] A review print screened by Daily Variety on December 31, 1932,[4] ran for 102 minutes, indicating that as many as 17 minutes were cut.[5]

Walter Huston had recently portrayed Lincoln in the 1930 biographical film Abraham Lincoln, which was adapted for the screen by Stephen Vincent Benét, author of the epic poem John Brown’s Body, winner of a 1929 Pulitzer Prize. Huston's performance in the film was highly praised, in spite of the fact that the cosmetics used to make him look younger in the scenes of Lincoln's youth had a comical effect.[6]

According to Turner Classic Movies, modern sources have uncovered the fact that Louis B. Mayer did not see the script before filming and, as a staunch Republican and supporter of Herbert Hoover, held the film back until after the inauguration of President Roosevelt on March 4.[7]

In a 2013 article in The New Yorker, Richard Brody wrote that “The story is extraordinary—and so is the story of its production, as told in Matthew Bernstein’s biography of its producer, Walter Wanger, who gave the project its impetus. Hammond is a wild man with a purpose—and the new U.S. President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, loved it. As Bernstein tells it, this was no surprise; the movie was conceived as a Rooseveltian vehicle from the start. Wanger bought the novel on which it was based—a British futuristic fantasy by Thomas W. Tweed—in January, 1933, two months before the inauguration (which, until that year, took place on March 4; the Twentieth Amendment, which passed the same month, moved it to January 20). Wanger rushed the movie into production (Hearst himself wrote some of Hammond’s most flamboyant flights of political rhetoric) and rushed it into production (they shot for two weeks in February) so that it could be released soon after the inauguration.”[8] (However, despite Bernstein's assertions in his biography of producer Wanger, the production timeline given here could not have happened, as the Variety review of a December 1932 pre-release screening of the film cited above proves.)

“Wanger was working under the aegis of the production company owned by William Randolph Hearst, an ardent Roosevelt supporter (and who had much to do with Roosevelt securing the Democratic nomination) whose films were distributed by M-G-M, the boss of which, Louis B. Mayer, was a rock-ribbed Republican. Though Mayer was appalled, he didn’t block its release (on March 31). In a piquant detail, Bernstein reports, “When Wanger, a staunch Roosevelt supporter, approached [the producer Irving] Thalberg about his differences with Mayer over politics and production ideas, Thalberg had told Wanger, ‘Don’t pay any attention to him.’” (Thalberg was the ill-fated “boy wonder” producer who ran the studio along with Mayer, and whom F. Scott Fitzgerald transformed into the title character of The Last Tycoon) Rather, Wanger faced an even higher authority—the censorious Hays Code office, which required some changes, even some reshoots that blunted some of the sharpest political satire.”[8]

Richard Brody, writing for The New Yorker in 2013, says that “One of the reasons for the movie’s impact is its direction, by Gregory La Cava, who is one of the most distinctive of Hollywood talents of the nineteen-thirties and early forties... He’s essentially a comic director, but one whose sense of humor is laced with dark and poignant melodrama. His joltingly mixed moods have a novelistic sensibility, with a fluid and astute visual vulnerability to match. I’ve written here about his 1941 comic drama Unfinished Business, perhaps his masterwork (followed closely by My Man Godfrey and Stage Door) and compared it to a novel by Dawn Powell. In “Gabriel,” Hammond comes off not as a stuffy and out-of-touch grandee such as Hoover, but as a free-swinging, superannuated vestige of the Jazz Age, a character from Fitzgerald in the era of Steinbeck. La Cava's direction of Huston is kaleidoscopically dazzling; together, they turn the abstractions of straw-figure advocacy into an emotionally intricate and ever-surprising character. Hammond's quasi-divine possession comes off as a sort of distanced madness, a fury that grips him not at all blindly; he calmly and unapologetically observes himself rising—or going deeper—into world-historical grandeur. In the presence of radio microphones and world leaders, Hammond delivers a wild speech (dictated by Hearst), that, in its utopian and histrionic extremes, foreshadows the climactic oration by Charlie Chaplin in The Great Dictator even as the specifics of the principled power-grab at the core of the film seem downright fascistic.”[9]

Although an internal MGM synopsis had labeled the script "wildly reactionary and radical to the nth degree," studio boss Louis B. Mayer "learned only when he attended the Glendale, California preview that Hammond gradually turns America into a dictatorship" writes film historian Barbara Hall. Bernstein contradicts this statement saying that Mayer was kept posted all along, particularly through communications from the censor. According to Bernstein's biography of Wanger, however, "Mayer was furious, telling his lieutenant, 'Put that picture back in its can, take it back to the studio, and lock it up!'"

Criticism[edit]

Variety reviewed the film on December 31, 1932. It described the film as “A mess of political tripe superlatively hoked up into a picture of strong popular possibilities...a cleverly executed commercial release... Huston plays the part so persuasively that witnessers will be tricked into accepting its monstrous exaggerations.” Tone and Morley “carry what amount to walk-on parts and make them look like leads.“[4]

Reviewing it on April 1, 1933, Mordaunt Hall of The New York Times observed “It is a curious, somewhat fantastic and often melodramatic story, but nevertheless one which at this time is very interesting. It is concerned with a fictitious President of the United States named Judson Hammond ...who in the first sequences is portrayed as a careless partisan politician, becomes an earnest and conscientious President, who tackles the problems of unemployment, crime and the foreign debts something after the fashion of a Lincoln.”[10]

The film was labeled by The New Republic as "a half-hearted plea for Fascism".[11] The Nation said that its purpose was "to convert innocent American movie audiences to a policy of fascist dictatorship in this country."[12]

The blurb for a 1998 film series titled “Religion and the Founding of the American Republic” at The Library of Congress comments on the film as follows:

President Judson Hammond is transformed from party hack to dynamic leader after his miraculous recovery from an automobile accident. The good news: he reduces unemployment, lifts the country out of the Depression, battles gangsters and Congress, and brings about world peace. The bad news: he's Mussolini. Gabriel Over the White House is a delight precisely because of its confused ideology. Depending on your perspective, it's a strident defense of democracy and the wisdom of the common man, a good argument for benevolent dictatorship, a prescient anticipation of the New Deal, a call for theocratic governance, and on and on.[13]

In a 2018, article for Politico, Jeff Greenfield suggests that the film “offers us significant insights into what tempts countries to travel down an authoritarian road.” “Rushed into production with the financial help of publishing magnate William Randolph Hearst ...it was designed as a clear message to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt that he might need to embrace dictatorial powers to solve the crisis of the Great Depression. (It was an idea embraced by establishment types like columnist Walter Lippmann, and the influential editorial pages of the New York Herald-Tribune.)”[14]

Greenfield adds, “The movie was welcomed by, among others, FDR, who told the filmmakers “it would do a lot of good.” (It was more than coincidental that the fireside chats, the public works programs and banking reforms all became part of FDR's “first 100 days.“) “Gabriel Over the White House” was both a critical and commercial hit... It turned a tidy profit of some $200,000. But it faded into obscurity, in large measure because the idea of a ‘benevolent dictatorship” seemed a lot less attractive after the degradation of Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin.’ “ However, Greenfield sees relevance today, and says the film is worth watching to understand our era.[14]

In a 2013 New Yorker article, Richard Brody wrote:

It’s hard to imagine such a film being made now (except in the novel’s original form, as a dystopian fantasy); it’s even harder to imagine any modern-day liberal exulting in it. The difference may be in the morality of power; it may also be in the incommensurable depth of the crisis faced in the Depression, about which the movie, though fantasy, seems utterly reportorial.[8]

Newsweek's Jonathan Alter concurred in 2007 that the movie was meant to "prepare the public for a dictatorship."[15]

"An aroma of fascism clung to the heavily edited release print", according to Leonard Leff, co-author of The Dame in the Kimono: Hollywood, Censorship and the Production Code .[16][17]

It has been described as a "bizarre political fantasy"[2] and which "posits a favorable view of fascism."[18]

Producer Walter Wanger, "a staunch Roosevelt supporter,"[19] bought the story in January 1933, two months before FDR's inauguration.[9] After two weeks of script preparation, Wanger secured the financial backing of media magnate William Randolph Hearst.[20]

The film was released in Britain,[when?] but was not a commercial success. Newsreel film of the Royal Navy was spliced into the yacht sequence in the British version, implying that both Britain and the United States were co-operating to obtain disarmament. The movie made a net profit of $206,000.[1]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b Bernstein 434
  2. ^ a b Clute and Grant, 380
  3. ^ "Gabriel over the White House (1933) - Original Print Info - TCM.com". Turner Classic Movies. Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  4. ^ a b "Search Results". Variety. February 27, 2013. Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  5. ^ "Gabriel over the White House (1933) - Notes - TCM.com". Turner Classic Movies. Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  6. ^ "Abraham Lincoln". Turner Classic Movies. Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  7. ^ "Gabriel over the White House (1933) - Notes - TCM.com". Turner Classic Movies. Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  8. ^ a b c "The Hollywood Movie Made for F.D.R.'s Inauguration". The New Yorker. January 21, 2013. ISSN 0028-792X. Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  9. ^ a b Brody, Richard (January 21, 2013). "The Hollywood Movie Made for F.D.R.'s Inauguration". The New Yorker. Retrieved November 5, 2018.
  10. ^ Hall, Mordaunt (April 1, 1933). "Walter Huston as a President of the United States Who Proclaims Himself a Dictator". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  11. ^ Ron Briley, "The Sun Comes Out Tomorrow," in Young, Nancy Beck; Pederson, William D.; Daynes, Byron W., eds. (2001). Franklin D. Roosevelt and the shaping of American political culture. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. p. 24. ISBN 0-7656-0620-8. Retrieved August 22, 2010.
  12. ^ Birdwell, Michael E. (2000). Celluloid Soldiers: The Warner Bros. Campaign Against Nazism. New York: NYU Press. p. 15. ISBN 0-8147-9871-3. Retrieved August 22, 2010.
  13. ^ "Film Series - Religion and the Founding of the American Republic | Exhibitions (Library of Congress)". www.loc.gov. Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  14. ^ a b Greenfield, Jeff. "The Hollywood Hit Movie That Urged FDR to Become a Fascist". Politico. Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  15. ^ Alter, 6
  16. ^ Leff, Leonard J.; Jerold Simmons (2001). The dame in the kimono: hollywood, censorship, and the production code. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky. p. 39. ISBN 0-8131-9011-8. Retrieved August 21, 2010.
  17. ^ Hayward, Mike (March 15, 2002). "The Dame In The Kimono: Hollywood, Censorship, And The Production Code". Variety. Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  18. ^ Schroeder, Alan (2004). Celebrity-in-chief: how show business took over the White House. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. p. 287. ISBN 0-8133-4137-X. Retrieved August 21, 2010.
  19. ^ Bernstein 84
  20. ^ Greenfield, Jeff (March 25, 2017). "The Hollywood Hit Movie That Urged FDR to Become a Fascist". Politico. The film, directed by Gregory La Cava, had been rushed into production with the financial help of publishing magnate William Randolph Hearst, and it was designed as a clear message to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt that he might need to embrace dictatorial powers to solve the crisis of the Great Depression.

References[edit]

External links[edit]