|This article needs additional citations for verification. (January 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
|Mission type||Lander / Atmospheric probe|
|Manufacturer||Hughes Aircraft Company|
|BOL mass||339 kg (747 lb)|
|Start of mission|
|Launch date||December 7, 1995|
|Rocket||STS-34 piggybacking with Galileo orbiter|
The Galileo Probe was an atmospheric-entry probe carried by the main Galileo spacecraft to Jupiter, where it directly entered a hot spot and returned data from the planet. The 339-kilogram (747 lb) probe was built by Hughes Aircraft Company at its El Segundo, California plant, measured about 1.3 meters (4.3 ft) across. Inside the probe's heat shield, the scientific instruments were protected from extreme heat and pressure during its high-speed journey into the Jovian atmosphere, entering at 47.8 kilometers (29.7 mi) per second. It entered Jupiter on December 7 1995, 22:04 UTC and stopped functioning 23:01 UTC, 57.6 minutes later.
The probe was released from the main spacecraft in July 1995, five months before reaching Jupiter, and entered Jupiter's atmosphere with no braking beforehand. The probe was slowed from its arrival speed of about 47 kilometers per second to subsonic speed in less than two minutes. The rapid flight through the atmosphere heated the heat shield to around 15,500 °C (27,932 °F).
At the time, this was by far the most difficult atmospheric entry ever attempted; the probe had to withstand a deceleration of 230 g and the probe's 152 kg heat shield, making up almost half of the probe's total mass, lost 80 kg during the entry. NASA built a special laboratory, the Giant Planet Facility, to simulate the heat load, which was similar to the convective heating experienced by an ICBM warhead reentering the atmosphere combined with the radiative heating of a thermonuclear fireball. It then deployed its 2.5-meter (8.2-foot) parachute, and dropped its heat shield, which fell into Jupiter's interior.
As the probe descended through 156 kilometres (97 mi) of the top layers of the Jovian atmosphere, it collected 58 minutes of data on the local weather. It only stopped transmitting when the ambient pressure exceeded 23 atmospheres and the temperature reached 153 °C (307 °F). The data was sent to the spacecraft overhead, then transmitted back to Earth. Each of 2 L-band transmitters operated at 128 bytes per second and sent nearly identical streams of scientific data to the orbiter. All the probe's electronics were powered by lithium sulfur dioxide (LiSO2) batteries that provided a nominal power output of about 580 watts with an estimated capacity of about 21 ampere-hours on arrival at Jupiter.
The probe included seven instruments for taking data on its plunge into Jupiter:
- an atmospheric structure instrument measuring temperature, pressure and deceleration,
- a neutral mass spectrometer,
- a Helium Abundance Detector, an interferometer) supporting atmospheric composition studies,
- a nephelometer for cloud location and cloud-particle observations,
- a net-flux radiometer measuring the difference between upward and downward radiant flux at each altitude, and
- a lightning and radio emission instrument measuring light and radio emissions associated with lightning
- an energetic particle detector measuring energetic particles in Jupiter's radiation belts.
In addition, the probe's heat shield contained instrumentation to measure ablation during descent. Total data returned from the probe was about 3.5 megabits (~460,000 bytes). The probe stopped transmitting before the line of sight link with the orbiter was cut.[further explanation needed] The likely proximal cause of the final probe failure was overheating, which sensors indicated before signal loss.
End and results
Theoretical analysis indicates that the parachute would have melted first, roughly 105 minutes after entry, then the aluminum components after another 40 minutes of free fall through a sea of supercritical fluid hydrogen. The titanium structure would have lasted around 6.5 hours more before disintegrating. Due to the high pressure, the droplets of metals from the probe would finally have vaporized once their critical temperature had been reached, and mixed with Jupiter's liquid metallic hydrogen interior. The probe was expected to have completely vaporized 10 hours after its atmospheric entry.
The probe entered Jupiter's atmosphere at 22:04 UTC. Before the atmospheric entry, the probe discovered a new radiation belt 31,000 miles (50,000 km) above Jupiter's cloud tops. The atmosphere through which it subsequently descended was found to be much denser and hotter than expected. Jupiter was also found to have only half the amount of helium expected and the data did not support the three-layered cloud structure theory. Only one significant cloud layer was measured by the probe, but with many indications of smaller areas of increased particle densities along all of the trajectory. The probe detected less lightning, less water, but more winds than expected. The atmosphere was more turbulent and the winds a lot stronger than the expected maximum of 350 kilometers per hour (220 mph). It required a laborious analysis of the initial wind data from the probe to determine the actual measured wind speeds. The results eventually showed that wind speeds in the outermost layers were 290-360 kilometers per hour (80-100 m/s), in agreement with previous measurements from afar, but that winds increased dramatically at pressure levels of 1-4 bars, then remaining consistently high at around 610 kilometers per hour (170 m/s). No solid surface was detected during the 156 kilometres (97 mi) downward journey. Subsequent analysis determined that the Galileo probe had entered a so-called hot spot in Jupiter's atmosphere.
Artist's impression of the probe's entry into Jupiter's atmosphere
Diagram of the atmospheric entry probe's instruments and subsystems
- Douglas Isbell and David Morse (22 January 1996). "Galileo Probe Science Results". JPL. Retrieved 4 March 2016.
- "Hughes Science/Scope Press Release and Advertisement, retrieved from Flight Global Archives May 23, 2010". flightglobal.com. Retrieved 2011-05-15.
- Chu-Thielbar (2007-07-19). "Probing Planets: Can You Get There From Here?". Retrieved 2007-07-27.
- Julio Magalhães (1997-09-17). "Galileo Probe Heat Shield Ablation". NASA Ames Research Center. Retrieved 2006-12-12.
- Julio Magalhães (1996-12-06). "The Galileo Probe Spacecraft". NASA Ames Research Center. Retrieved 2006-12-12.
- Laub, B.; Venkatapathy, E. (6–9 October 2003). "Thermal Protection System Technology and Facility Needs for Demanding Future Planetary Missions" (PDF). International Workshop on Planetary Probe Atmospheric Entry and Descent Trajectory Analysis and Science. Lisbon, Portugal. Retrieved 2006-12-12.
- Bernard Laub (2004-10-19). "Development of New Ablative Thermal Protection Systems (TPS)". NASA Ames Research Center. Retrieved 2006-12-12.
- "''Galileo'' Mission to Jupiter, NASA". .jpl.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2011-05-15.
- Galileo Probe NASA Space Science Data Coordinated Archive
- Milos, Frank S. (1997). "Galileo Probe Heat Shield Ablation Experiment". Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 34 (6): 705–713. doi:10.2514/2.3293.
- Jonathan McDowell (1995-12-08). "Jonathan's Space Report, No. 267". Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Retrieved 2007-05-06.
- Galileo Probe Entry Timeline NASA
- Results of the Galileo probe nephelometer experiment
- Deep winds on Jupiter as measured by the Galileo probe
- Galileo Probe NASA Space Science Data Coordinated Archive