A Gantt chart is a type of bar chart that illustrates a project schedule, named after its inventor, Henry Gantt (1861–1919), who designed such a chart around the years 1910–1915. Modern Gantt charts also show the dependency relationships between activities and current schedule status.
A Gantt chart is a type of bar chart that illustrates a project schedule. This chart lists the tasks to be performed on the vertical axis, and time intervals on the horizontal axis. The width of the horizontal bars in the graph shows the duration of each activity. Gantt charts illustrate the start and finish dates of the terminal elements and summary elements of a project. Terminal elements and summary elements constitute the work breakdown structure of the project. Modern Gantt charts also show the dependency (i.e., precedence network) relationships between activities. Gantt charts can be used to show current schedule status using percent-complete shadings and a vertical "TODAY" line as shown here.
Gantt charts are usually created initially using an early start time approach, where each task is scheduled to start immediately when its prerequisites are complete. This method maximizes the float time available for all tasks.
Although now regarded as a common charting technique, Gantt charts were considered revolutionary when first introduced. The first known tool of this type was developed in 1896 by Karol Adamiecki, who called it a harmonogram. Adamiecki did not publish his chart until 1931, however, and only in Polish, which limited both its adoption and recognition of his authorship.
In 1912, Hermann Schürch published what would be considered Gantt charts while discussing a construction project. It appears that Schürch's charts were not notable but rather routine in Germany at the time they were published. The prior development leading to Schürch's work is unknown. Unlike later Gantt charts, Schürch's charts did not display interdependencies, leaving them to be inferred by the reader. These were also static representations of a planned schedule.
The earliest Gantt charts were drawn on paper and therefore had to be redrawn entirely in order to adjust to schedule changes. For many years, project managers used pieces of paper or blocks for Gantt chart bars so they could be adjusted as needed. In the 1980s, personal computers allowed widespread creation of complex and elaborate Gantt charts. The first desktop applications were intended mainly for project managers and project schedulers. With the advent of the Internet and increased collaboration over networks at the end of the 1990s, Gantt charts became a common feature of web-based applications, including collaborative groupware. By 2012, almost all Gantt charts were made by software which can easily adjust to schedule changes.
In 1999, Gantt charts were identified as "one of the most widely used management tools for project scheduling and control".
In the following table there are seven tasks, labeled a through g. Some tasks can be done concurrently (a and b) while others cannot be done until their predecessor task is complete (c and d cannot begin until a is complete). Additionally, each task has three time estimates: the optimistic time estimate (O), the most likely or normal time estimate (M), and the pessimistic time estimate (P). The expected time (TE) is estimated using the beta probability distribution for the time estimates, using the formula (O + 4M + P) ÷ 6.
|Activity||Predecessor||Time estimates||Expected time (TE)|
|Opt. (O)||Normal (M)||Pess. (P)|
Once this step is complete, one can draw a Gantt chart or a network diagram.
Progress Gantt charts
In a progress Gantt chart, tasks are shaded in proportion to the degree of their completion: a task that is 60% complete would be 60% shaded, starting from the left. A vertical line is drawn at the time index when the progress Gantt chart is created, and this line can then be compared with shaded tasks. If everything is on schedule, all task portions left of the line will be shaded, and all task portions right of the line will not be shaded. This provides a visual representation of how the project and its tasks are ahead or behind schedule.
Linked Gantt charts
Linked Gantt charts contain lines indicating the dependencies between tasks. However, linked Gantt charts quickly become cluttered in all but the simplest cases. Critical path network diagrams are superior to visually communicate the relationships between tasks. However, Gantt charts are often preferred over network diagrams because Gantt charts are easily interpreted without training, whereas critical path diagrams require training to interpret. Gantt chart software typically provides mechanisms to link task dependencies, although this data may or may not be visually represented. Gantt charts and network diagrams are often used for the same project, both being generated from the same data by a software application.
- Gantt 1910.
- Morris 1997, p. 7.
- Klein 1999, p. 49.
- Richman 2002, pp. 97, 117, 276.
- Richman 2002, pp. 117, 276.
- Selig 2008, p. 235.
- Flouris & Lock 2012, p. 236, Chapter 12.
- Wilson 2003.
- Marsh 1974, p. 32.
- Weaver 2012a, pp. 5–6.
- Weaver 2012b, pp. 4–6.
- Weaver 2017, pp. 6–7.
- Weaver 2017, p. 7.
- Weaver 2017, p. 6.
- Clark 1922.
- Flouris & Lock 2012, p. 281, Chapter 14.
- Klein 1999, pp. 56–57.
- Flouris & Lock 2012, p. 239, Chapter 12.
- Clark, Wallace (1922). The Gantt Chart: A Working Tool of Management. New York, NY: Ronald Press.
- Flouris, Triant G.; Lock, Dennis (2012). Managing Aviation Projects from Concept to Completion. Ashgate Publishing Limited. ISBN 978-1-4094-8613-8.
- Gantt, H.L. (1910). "Work, Wages and Profit". Engineering Magazine. New York.; republished as Work, Wages and Profits. Easton, Pennsylvania: Hive Publishing Company. 1974. ISBN 0-87960-048-9.
- Klein, R. (1999). Scheduling of Resource-Constrained Projects. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series. Springer US. ISBN 978-0-7923-8637-7.
- Marsh, Edward R. (1974). "The Harmonogram of Karol Adamiecki". Academy of Management Proceedings: 32. doi:10.5465/ambpp.1974.17530521. ISSN 0065-0668.
- Morris, Peter W. G. (1997) . The Management of Projects. Thomas Telford. ISBN 978-0-7277-2593-6.
- Richman, L. (2002). Project Management Step-by-step. Amacom. ISBN 978-0-8144-2657-9.
- Selig, Gad J. (2008). Implementing IT Governance: A Practical Guide to Global Best Practices in IT Management. Van Haren Publishing. ISBN 978-90-8753-774-6.
- Weaver, Patrick (2012a). "Henry L Gantt, 1861–1919: A retrospective view of his work" (PDF). PM World Journal. Retrieved 29 January 2018. (It is unclear when this was last modified. The PDF metadata indicates 2015, and a note in the text says "Augmented with additional materials received since publication".)
- Weaver, Patrick (2012b). "Henry L Gantt, 1861–1919: Debunking the myths, a retrospective view of his work" (PDF). 1 (5). Retrieved 29 January 2018.
- Weaver, Patrick (2017). "A Brief History of Scheduling: Back to the Future" (PDF). Retrieved 29 January 2018. Adapted from "A Brief History of Scheduling: Back to the Future" (PDF). PM World Journal. 3 (8). 2014. Adapted from an even earlier 2006 presentation.
- Wilson, James M. (2003). "Gantt charts: A centenary appreciation" (PDF). European Journal of Operational Research. 149 (2): 430–437. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00769-5. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 November 2013. Retrieved 28 July 2013.
- Burkhard, Remo Aslak; Meier, Michael; Rodgers, Peter; Smis, Matthias Thomas Jelle; Stott, Jonathan (2005). Knowledge visualization: A comparative study between Project Tube Maps and Gantt Charts. 5th International Conference on Knowledge Management. Graz, Austria: University of Kent. Retrieved 17 September 2017.
- Geraldi, Joana; Lechter, Thomas (2012). "Gantt charts revisited: A critical analysis of its roots and implications to the management of projects today". International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 5 (4): 578–594. doi:10.1108/17538371211268889.
- Kumar, Pankaja Pradeep (2005). ISSN 0274-9696. Retrieved 17 September 2017. . Cost engineering. 47 (7): 14–21.
- Marsh, Edward R. (1975). "The Harmonogram of Karol Adamiecki". Academy of Management Journal. 18 (2): 358–364. doi:10.2307/255537. JSTOR 255537.
- Maylor, Harvey (2001). "Beyond the Gantt chart: Project management moving on". European Management Journal. 19 (1): 92–100. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00074-8.
- Schürch, Hermann (1915), "Der Bau des Talüberganges bei Langwies an der elektrischen Bahn Chur-Arosa" [The construction of the valley crossing at Langwies of the Chur-Arosa electric railway line] (PDF), Armierter Beton: Monatsschrift für Theorie und Praxis des gesamten Betonbaues (Reinforced concrete: Monthly for theory and practice of the entire concrete construction) (in German), Berlin: Springer, 8 (10), pp. 229–238, retrieved 29 January 2018
- Virine, Lev & Trumper, Michael (2013), ProjectThink. Why Good Managers Make Poor Project Choices, Gower Pub Co., ISBN 978-1409454984
- Virine, Lev & Trumper, Michael (2017), Project Risk Analysis Made Ridiculously Simple, World Scientific Publishing, ISBN 978-9814759373
- Weaver, Patrick. "Henry L. Gantt: A Retrospective view of his work". Retrieved 29 January 2018.
- Weaver, Patrick. "A Brief History of Scheduling".
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Gantt charts.|
|Look up gantt chart in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.|