Garuda Indonesia Flight 200
Tail of Garuda Indonesia Flight 200.
|Date||7 March 2007|
|Summary||Runway overrun, pilot error|
|Site||Adisucipto International Airport (IATA: JOG; ICAO: WARJ)
|Injuries (non-fatal)||112 (12 serious)|
|Aircraft type||Boeing 737–4B7|
Garuda Indonesia Flight 200 (GA200) was a scheduled domestic passenger flight of a Boeing 737-400 operated by Garuda Indonesia between Jakarta and Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The aircraft crashed and burst into flames while landing at Adisucipto International Airport on 7 March 2007. Twenty passengers and one crew member were killed; both the captain and the first officer survived and were admitted to an Indonesian military hospital.
The aircraft was a Boeing 737-4B7, registered as PK-GZC, which had been operated by three airlines – Aloha Airlines, Star Europe and Jet Airways – before being acquired by Garuda Indonesia. The aircraft had a total of 35,157 airframe hours and 37,328 cycles since its first flight on 5 November 1992.
The oldest airline in Indonesia (founded in 1949), Garuda Indonesia had received a number of criticisms in the months surrounding the crash. According to Australian aviation experts, Garuda Indonesia had one of the worst safety records among the world's national carriers. Since 1950, Garuda Indonesia has had 13 major accidents with the most recent in 2002, when Garuda Indonesia Flight 421 ditched in the Bengawan Solo River due to engine flameout caused by excessive hail ingestion, killing a flight attendant. The managing director of the Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation, Peter Harbison, stated that the major accidents in Indonesian aviation history were all caused by the combinations of airports' and fleets' low safety standards and the poor weather conditions in the area, including severe thunderstorms and other forms of inclement weather.
Following the crash of flight 200, the European Union banned Garuda and all Indonesian airlines from flying into the EU. The ban led to widespread reforms within Garuda to improve both its safety and service standards, and led to the implementation of the 5-year Quantum Leap program, which nearly doubled its fleet, introduced new aircraft such as the Boeing 737-800 and Boeing 777-300ER, and also connected more destinations, with the airline starting or resuming service to destinations like Amsterdam and London.
Flight GA200 originated in Jakarta and was carrying 133 passengers, 19 of whom were foreigners. Several Australian journalists were on the flight, covering the visit of Foreign Affairs Minister Alexander Downer and Attorney-General Philip Ruddock to Java. They were on the flight as the aircraft carrying Australian dignitaries were at capacity.
At 6:58am local time (UTC+7), the captain attempted to land at Adisucipto International Airport, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, despite a faulty approach with excess speed and steep descent, and the resulting warnings of copilot and flight system. The aircraft touched down 860m beyond the runway threshold at a speed of 221kt, 87kt faster than the normal landing speed. According to passengers, the plane shook violently before it crashed. The aircraft overran the end of the runway, went through the perimeter fence, was heavily damaged when it crossed a road, and stopped in a nearby rice field. A fuel-fed fire raged, which could not be reached by airport fire-suppression vehicles. While most passengers were able to escape, a number of passengers perished inside the burning fuselage.
One of the passengers was a cameraman for the Australian Seven Network. He escaped from the burning wreckage with his camera and started filming the aftermath. He made a telephone call to inform the network's Sydney newsroom and the footage was beamed back to appear on the 6pm news of that night. Australian Federal Police agents Brice Steele and Mark Scott, Australian Embassy staffers Liz O'Neill (public relations officer) and Allison Sudradjat (Minister Counsellor and Senior Representative of AusAID), and Australian Financial Review newspaper journalist Morgan Mellish and American resident Edi Suharyo were among those killed.
The accident was investigated by the Indonesian National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC). Australian Federal Police disaster victim identification experts were deployed to the scene to assist with the identification of bodies. Australian Transport Safety Bureau staff assisted at the scene by inspecting the wreckage to attempt to piece together a picture of the incident. The United States' National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) dispatched a team to assist in the investigation, including representatives from Boeing and the Federal Aviation Administration. The "black box" recorders consisting of a flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder were removed from the wreckage and flown to Canberra, Australia, for further analysis by the Bureau of Air Safety Investigations using equipment not yet available in Indonesia. Staff in Australia could not read the cockpit voice recorder, which was then sent to the Boeing factory in Seattle, United States, to be deciphered.
Report of the NTSC
After the crews were interviewed, the wreckage was examined, flight data and cockpit voice recordings were analyzed, and a safety review of the airport was conducted, Indonesia's National Safety Transport Committee released their final report on 22 October 2007. No evidence was found of any defect or malfunction of the aircraft or its systems that could have contributed to the accident. Records showed only the right thrust reverser had been used for the previous 27 sectors, but a fault condition for the left reverser was reset by engineers before departure for this flight, and both were deployed during the landing roll. The weather was calm. It was noted that the Yogyakarta Airport did not conform to international safety standards, having a runway runoff 60m in length, compared to a recommended 90m;.
The key NTSC finding is that the aircraft was flown by the Pilot in Command (PIC) at an excessively steep descent and high airspeed (241 kts rather than the normal 141 kts) during the approach and landing, resulting in unstable flight. The PIC's attention became fixated on trying to make the first approach work, and he failed to heed the warnings of the copilot and his recommendations to abort the landing and go around, and the repeated warnings from the aircraft flight systems, which were audible in the voice recorder data, e.g. ‘SINK RATE’ and ‘WHOOP, WHOOP, PULL UP’. The copilot failed to take control of the aircraft in these extraordinary circumstances, as required by airline policy, apparently due to inadequate training. Wing flaps were not fully extended to the maximum 40°, not even to the 15° repeatedly requested by the PIC, but only to 5° because the copilot was aware that this was the recommended maximum for that high airspeed, but he failed to so notify the PIC.
Touchdown followed by two bounces began 240 m beyond the nominal touchdown zone. The nose landing gear were severely damaged and disintegrated during the following roll. The main engine thrust reversers were deployed 4 seconds after the touchdown, continued for 7 seconds, but were stowed 7 seconds before the aircraft left the end of the paved runway and ploughed through the airport perimeter fence. About 160 meters beyond the end of the runway, the aircraft crossed a small ditch and adjacent road that is 1−2 m below the level of both the runaway and the rice paddy on the far side. Hence the nose of the aircraft impacted the following embankment and the engines impacted the concrete curb just before that embankment. The aircraft came to rest in the rice paddy field 252 meters beyond the runway. It was severely damaged by the impact forces, leading to an intense, fuel-fed fire. Airport fire-control vehicles were unable to reach the crash site through the ruptured fence because of the slope and ditch between there and the road. They were able to deliver little of their fire suppression foam on the burning aircraft because the hose that they dragged across the road became punctured by rescue vehicles and onlookers’ vehicles driving over it and sharp objects such as the damaged fence. About 45 minutes after the crash, two city fire fighting vehicles arrived and were ordered by an un-qualified person to start hosing the fire with water. The fire was extinguished about 2 hours and 10 minutes after the crash. Coordination and procedures during the rescue were not in accordance with the Airport Emergency Plan (AEP) manual, and lacked coherence.
In summary, the NTSC Report attributed the accident to pilot error.
As of March 1, 2007, Garuda Indonesia had implemented a new fuel efficiency incentive, which would award a salary bonus if fuel consumption for a flight were lower than nominal. During his interview with the NTSC, the captain denied that this had influenced his decision not to abort the landing.
Prosecution of the captain
On 4 February 2008 the captain, Marwoto Komar, was arrested and charged with six counts of manslaughter. The charge carries a penalty up to life imprisonment if the court finds the crash was deliberate. Short of that finding, the lesser charge of negligent flying causing death carries a maximum sentence of seven years. The copilot testified that he had told the captain to go around because of excessive speed, and that he then had blacked out due to the severe buffeting. On 6 April 2009, the captain was found guilty of negligence and sentenced to 2 years in jail. The captain's lawyers stated their intention to appeal on the basis that the Convention on International Civil Aviation, to which Indonesia is a party, stipulates that aviation accident investigation reports cannot be used to ascribe blame, but only to determine cause. The Garuda Pilot's Association and Indonesian Pilots Federation threatened to strike in protest against the conviction. On 29 September 2009, the conviction was quashed by the Indonesian High Court, who found that the prosecutors had failed to prove that the pilot was “officially and convincingly guilty of a crime”. This case was later cited in a report published by the American Bar Association, in a defence of the principle that airline safety is undermined by such prosecution because its threat would impede the investigative processes.
Change of flight number
Garuda has changed the flight number from GA 200 to GA 202. GA 200 normally left Jakarta at around 6.15 AM (the first flight out of Jakarta bound for Yogyakarta). GA 202 now leaves at 5.25am.
As is the case with most airlines following a fatal crash, Garuda Indonesia changed the flight number of the earliest morning Jakarta-Yogyakarta service from flight 200 to 202, both to avoid superstition and out of respect for the dead. GA202 now approximately an hour earlier than flight 200, departing at 5.25am.
- Air safety
- Engineered materials arrestor system
- Ground effect in aircraft
- List of notable accidents and incidents on commercial aircraft
- Pilot error
- Runway safety area
- SilkAir Flight 185
- Fiona Wood
- "Indonesia crash survivors describe ordeal". swissinfo.org. Reuters. 7 March 2007.
- NTSC final report, section 1.2 "Injuries to persons", page 7
- "Information on passengers of GA200". Garuda Indonesia. 7 March 2007.[dead link]
- "PK-GZC Garuda Indonesia Boeing 737–497 – cn 25664 / ln 2393". Planespotters. 9 March 2007. Retrieved 20 July 2007.
- Accident description at the Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved on 9 March 2007.
- Eagle, Stephen; Claire Leow (17 March 2005). "Indonesia dismisses Garuda directors". Bloomberg. Retrieved 7 March 2007.
- Ashton, Heath (7 March 2007). "Garuda in world's worst category". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 7 March 2007.
- http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/28/world/europe/28iht-airlines.5.6398202.html?_r=0. Missing or empty
- http://forum.detik.com/garuda-indonesias-quantum-leap-to-be-the-worlds-most-improved-t397035.html. Missing or empty
- Ruddock offers plane to crash survivors; The Age 7 March 2007; . Retrieved 8 March 2007
- VIP RAAF fleet upgrade follows tragedy, Herald Sun, 18 June 2008.
- NTSC final report, section 1.1 "History of the flight", page 2
- Firdaus, Irwan (7 March 2007). "115 escape Indonesia jet crash; 21 die". Chron News. Associated Press. Retrieved 8 March 2007.[dead link]
- NTSC final report, section 2.2, page 48
- NTSC final report, section 2.7, page 51
- Firdaus, Irwan (7 March 2007). "Flames engulf Indonesian jet, killing 21". Association Press Writer (Yahoo News). Archived from the original on 9 March 2007. Retrieved 7 March 2007.
- "Official: Indonesian plane's main exit didn't open". CNN. Reuters. 9 March 2007. Retrieved 10 March 2007.[dead link]
- "Pilot 'suicidal, blames wind gust'". NineMSN. 9 March 2007. Retrieved 10 March 2007.
- Firdaus, Irwan (7 March 2007). "Flames engulf Indonesian jet, killing 21". Associated Press Writer. Archived from the original on 29 September 2007. Retrieved 7 March 2007.
- Davis, Bruce (8 May 2007). "Head of AusAID Indonesia Confirmed Dead". Australian Agency for International Development (Australian Government; AusAID). Retrieved 8 May 2007.
- Barraclough, Steven (8 May 2007). "Death of Australians in Yogyakarta". Australian Embassy (Australian Embassy Indonesia). Retrieved 8 May 2007.
- "Garuda black box arrives in Australia". NEWS. Australian Associated Press. 9 March 2007. Retrieved 10 March 2007.[dead link]
- "NTSB SENDING TEAM TO ASSIST INDONESIA IN INVESTIGATION OF 737 CRASH" (Press release). National Transportation Safety Board. 7 March 2007. Retrieved 10 March 2007.
- NTSC final report, section 2.6 "Runway end safety area", page 51
- Mark Forbes (5 February 2008). "Captain charged over Garuda crash". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 5 February 2008.
- "Garuda crash pilot facing jail," The Australian
- Stephen Fitzpatrick (25 July 2008). "Garuda pilot 'missed chance' to correct deadly mistake". The Australian.
- Stephen Fitzpatrick (28 October 2008). "Garuda co-pilot 'blacked out' in Yogyakarta crash". The Australian.
- "Indonesian crash pilot sentenced". BBC News. 6 April 2009. Retrieved 6 April 2009.
- "Landing in Jail; Garuda Pilot Sentenced to 2 Years in Jail for Negligence in March 2007 Yogyakarta Fatal Crash". Bali Discovery Tours. 11 April 2009. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
- "Garuda crash verdict sparks strike threat". Special Broadcasting Service (Australia). 27 April 2009. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
- Allard, Tom (12 December 2009). "Crashed jet pilot's conviction quashed in high court". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 12 December 2009.
- Nemsick, Judith R.; Gogal Passeri, Sarah (21 March 2012). "Criminalizing Aviation: Placing Blame Before Safety". American Bar Association. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
- ["https://flightaware.com/live/flight/GIA202 "https://flightaware.com/live/flight/GIA202]. Missing or empty
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Garuda Indonesia Flight 200.|
|Pre-accident pictures of the airplane|
- National Transportation Safety Committee
- Final Report (Archive)
- Media Release – Final NTSC investigation report into the Boeing 737 accident at Yogyakarta on 7 March 2007 involving Garuda Indonesia flight GA200 (Archive)
- (Indonesian) Media Release – Laporan Akhir KNKT Penyelidikan Kecelakaan Pesawat Boeing 737 Garuda Indonesia GA200 di Yogyakarta, tanggal 7 Maret 2007 (Archive)