Gary Webb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For other people named Gary Webb, see Gary Webb (disambiguation).
Gary Webb
Gary Webb In His Own Words 623.jpg
Webb, c. 2002
Born Gary Stephen Webb
August 31, 1955
Corona, California, U.S.
Died December 10, 2004(2004-12-10) (aged 49)
Carmichael, California, U.S.
Cause of death
suicide
Education Northern Kentucky University
Occupation investigative reporter
Years active 1980–2004
Notable credit(s) Cleveland Plain Dealer
San Jose Mercury News
Spouse(s) Susan Bell
Children 3

Gary Stephen Webb (August 31, 1955 – December 10, 2004) was an American investigative reporter. He began his career on newspapers in Kentucky and Ohio, winning numerous awards and building a strong reputation for investigative writing. Hired by the San Jose Mercury News, Webb contributed to the paper's Pulitzer-prize winning coverage of the Loma Prieta earthquake. Webb is best known for his "Dark Alliance" series, which appeared in the Mercury News in 1996. The series examined the origins of the crack-cocaine trade in Los Angeles and claimed that members of the anti-government Contra rebels in Nicaragua had played a major role in creating the trade, using cocaine profits to support their struggle. It also suggested that they may have acted with the knowledge and protection of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The series provoked outrage in Los Angeles, particularly in the African-American community, and led to four major investigations of the series' charges.

The series became even more controversial when the Los Angeles Times and other major papers published articles suggesting its claims were overstated. After an internal review, the Mercury News ultimately published a statement in May 1997 acknowledging shortcomings in the series' reporting and editing. Webb resigned from the Mercury News in December 1997. He became an investigator for the California State Legislature, publishing a book based on the "Dark Alliance" series in 1998, and doing free-lance investigative reporting. Webb committed suicide on December 10, 2004.

Webb's reporting was strongly criticized in the controversy over the series. His supporters argued that Webb was unfairly made to bear the burden of the series' failings, while editorial errors and failures in oversight were ignored. There was also criticism of the reporting of the Los Angeles Times and other papers for focusing on problems in the series' claims instead of examining the questions the series raised. Many of Webb's supporters, while acknowledging errors in the series, also believe that the findings of the investigations vindicate Webb's basic claims.

Early life[edit]

Webb was born in Corona, California, the 1 of 2 children in his family. Webb's father was a Marine sergeant, and the family moved frequently, as his career took him to new assignments.[1] When Webb's father retired from the Marines, the family settled in a suburb of Indianapolis, where Webb and his brother attended high school.[2] After high school, Webb attended an Indianapolis community college on a scholarship until his family moved to Cincinnati. He then transferred to nearby Northern Kentucky University.[3]

Webb first began writing on the student newspaper at his college in Indianapolis.[4] After transferring to Northern Kentucky, Webb entered its journalism program and wrote for the school paper, the Northerner. Although he attended Northern Kentucky four years, he did not finish his degree. Instead, he found work in 1978 as a reporter at the Kentucky Post, a local paper affiliated with the larger Cincinnati Post.[5] In 1979, Webb married Susan Bell and the two eventually had three children.[6]

Early career[edit]

Webb's first major investigative work appeared in 1980, when the Post published "The Coal Connection," a seventeen part series by Webb and Post reporter Thomas Scheffey.[7] The series, which examined the murder of a coal company president with ties to organized crime, won the national Investigative Reporters and Editors Award for reporting from a small newspaper.[8]

In 1983 Webb moved to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, where he continued doing investigative work. A 1985 series, "Doctoring the Truth," uncovered problems in the State Medical Board.[9] It led to an Ohio House investigation which resulted in major revisions to the state Medical Practice Act.[10] Webb then moved to the paper's statehouse bureau where he covered state-wide issues, winning numerous regional journalism awards.[11]

In 1988, Webb was recruited by the San Jose Mercury News, which was looking for an investigative reporter. Webb was assigned to its Sacramento bureau, where he was allowed to choose most of his own stories.[12] As part of the Mercury News team that covered the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, Webb and his colleague Pete Carey wrote a story examining the reasons for the collapse of the Cypress Street Viaduct.[13] The Mercury News coverage of the earthquake won its staff the Pulitzer Prize for General News Reporting in 1990.[14]

Dark Alliance series[edit]

Webb began researching "Dark Alliance" in July 1995.[15] The series was published in the Mercury News in three parts, from August 18-20, 1996, with one long article and one to two shorter articles appearing each day. It was also posted on the Mercury News website with additional information, including documents cited in the series and audio recordings of people quoted in the articles.[16] The website logo showed the silhouette of a man smoking a crack pipe superimposed over the CIA seal.[17] This proved controversial and the Mercury News later changed it.

Series claims[edit]

The lead of the first article set out the series' basic claims: "For the better part of a decade, a San Francisco Bay Area drug ring sold tons of cocaine to the Crips and Bloods street gangs of Los Angeles and funneled millions in drug profits to a Latin American guerrilla army run by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency." This drug ring "opened the first pipeline between Colombia's cocaine cartels and the black neighborhoods of Los Angeles," and as a result, "The cocaine that flooded in helped spark a crack explosion in urban America."[18]

To show this, the series focused on three men: Ricky Ross, Oscar Danilo Blandon, and Norwin Meneses. Ross was a major drug dealer in Los Angeles. Blandon and Meneses were Nicaraguans who smuggled drugs into the U.S. and supplied dealers like Ross. After introducing the three, the first article discussed primarily Blandon and Meneses, and their relationship with the Contras and the CIA. Much of the article highlighted the failure of law enforcement agencies to successfully prosecute them, and suggested that this was largely due to their Contra and CIA connections.

The second article described Blandon's background and how he began smuggling cocaine to support the Contras. Meneses, an established smuggler and a Contra supporter as well, taught Blandon how to smuggle and provided him with cocaine. When Ricky Ross discovered the market for crack in Los Angeles, he began buying cocaine from Blandon. Blandon and Meneses' high volume supply of low-priced cocaine "allowed Ross to sew up the Los Angeles market and move on. In city after city, local dealers either bought from Ross or got left behind."[19]

The third article discussed the social effects of the crack trade, noting that it had a disparate effect on African-Americans. Asking why crack became so prevalent in the black community of Los Angeles, the article credited Blandon, "the Johnny Appleseed of crack in California."[20] It also found disparities in the treatment of black and white traffickers in the justice system, contrasting the treatment of Blandon and Ross after their arrests for drug trafficking. Because Blandon cooperated with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), he spent only 28 months in prison, became a paid government informer, and received permanent resident status. Ross was also released early after cooperating in an investigation of police corruption, but was rearrested a few months later in a sting operation arranged with the help of Blandon. The article suggested this was in retribution for Ross's testimony in the corruption case.

Response to the series[edit]

After the publication of "Dark Alliance," the Mercury News continued to pursue the story, publishing follow ups to the original series for the next three months.[21] Other papers were slow to pick up the story, but African-Americans quickly took note, especially in South-Central Los Angeles where the dealers discussed in the series had been active. They responded with outrage to the series' charges.[22]

California senators Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein also took note and wrote to CIA director John Deutch and Attorney General Janet Reno, asking for investigations into the stories.[23] Maxine Waters, the Representative for California's 35th district, which includes South-Central Los Angeles, was also outraged by the stories and became one of Webb's strongest supporters.[24] Waters urged the CIA, the Department of Justice, and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence to investigate.

By the end of September, three federal investigations had been announced: an investigation into the CIA allegations conducted by CIA Inspector-General Frederick Hitz, an investigation into the law enforcement allegations by Justice Department Inspector-General Michael Bromwich, and a second investigation into the CIA by the House Intelligence Committee.

Webb's continuing reporting also triggered a fourth investigation. The first article in "Dark Alliance" that discussed the failure of law enforcement agencies to prosecute Blandon and Meneses had mentioned several cases. One of these was a 1986 raid on Blandon's drug organization by the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, which the article suggested had produced evidence of CIA ties to drug smuggling that was later suppressed. When Webb wrote another story on the raid evidence in early October, it received wide attention in Los Angeles, and the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department began its own investigation into the "Dark Alliance" claims.[25]

Coverage in other papers[edit]

After the announcement of federal investigations into the claims made in the series, other newspapers began investigating and several papers ultimately published articles suggesting the series' claims were overstated.

The first detailed article on the series' claims appeared in the Washington Post in early October. [26] The front page article, by reporters Roberto Suro and Walter Pincus, found that "available information" did not support the series claims, and that "the rise of crack" was "a broad-based phenomenon" driven in numerous places by diverse players. The article also discussed Webb's contacts with Ricky Ross's attorney, and prosecution complaints of how Ross's defense had used Webb's series.[27]

The New York Times published two articles on the series in mid-October, both written by reporter Tim Golden. One article, dealing mostly with the response of the Los Angeles black community to the stories, described the series' evidence as "thin."[28] Golden also noted the controversy over Webb's contacts with Ross's lawyer. The other article, citing interviews with current and former intelligence and law-enforcement officials, questioned the importance of the drug dealers discussed in the series, both in the crack cocaine trade, and in supporting the Nicaraguan Contras fight against the Sandinista government.[29]

The Los Angeles Times devoted the most space to the story, developing its own three part series called "The Cocaine Trail." The series ran from October 20-22 1996, and was researched by a team of 17 reporters. The three articles in the series were written by four reporters: Jesse Katz, Doyle McManus, and John Mitchell and Sam Fulwood. The first article, by Katz, developed a different picture of the origins of the crack trade than "Dark Alliance" had described, with more gangs and smugglers participating.[30] The second article, by McManus, was the longest of the series, and dealt with the role of the Contras in the drug trade and CIA knowledge of drug activities by the Contras.[31] McManus found Blandon's and Meneses' contributions to Contra organizations significantly less than the "millions" claimed in the series, and no evidence that the CIA had tried to protect them. The third article, by Mitchell and Fulwood, covered the effects of crack on African-Americans, and how it affected their reaction to some of the rumors that arose after the "Dark Alliance" series.[32]

Mercury News response[edit]

Surprised by the Washington Post article, Mercury News executive editor Jerry Ceppos wrote to the Post defending the series.[33] The Post ultimately refused to print his letter.[34] Ceppos also asked reporter Pete Carey to write a critique of the series for publication in the Mercury News, and had the controversial website logo changed.[33] Carey's critique appeared in mid-October and went through several of the Post criticisms of the series, including the importance of Blandon's drug ring in spreading crack, questions about Blandon's testimony in court, and how specific series allegations about CIA involvement had been, giving Webb's responses.[35]

When the Los Angeles Times series appeared, Ceppos again wrote to defend the original series. He also defended the series in interviews with all three papers.[36] The extent of the criticism, however, convinced Ceppos that the Mercury News had to acknowledge to its readers that the series had been subjected to strong criticism.[37] He did this in a column that appeared on November 3rd, defending the series, but also committing the paper to a review of major criticisms.[38]

Ceppos's column drew editorial responses from both the New York Times and Washington Post. An editorial in the Times, while criticizing the series for making "unsubstantiated charges," conceded that it did find "drug-smuggling and dealing by Nicaraguans with at least tentative connections to the contras," and called for further investigation.[39]

The Post response came from the paper's ombudsman, Geneva Overholser. [40] Overholser was harshly critical of the series, "reported by a seemingly hotheaded fellow willing to have people leap to conclusions his reporting couldn't back up." But while calling the flaws in the series "unforgivably careless journalism," Overholser also criticized the Post's refusal to print Ceppos's letter defending the series, and sharply criticized the Post's coverage of the story. Calling the Post's overall focus "misplaced", Overholser expressed regret that the paper had not taken the opportunity to re-examine whether the CIA had overlooked Contra involvement in drug smuggling, "a subject The Post and the public had given short shrift."

In contrast, the series received support from Steve Weinberg, a former executive director of Investigative Reporters and Editors. In a long review of series claims in the Baltimore Sun, Weinberg said: "I think the critics have been far too harsh. Despite some hyped phrasing, "Dark Alliance" appears to be praiseworthy investigative reporting."[41]

After the series' publication, the Northern California branch of the national Society of Professional Journalists had voted Webb "Journalist of the Year" for 1996.[42] Despite the controversy that soon overtook the series, and the request of one board member to reconsider, the branch's board went ahead with the award in November.

End of the series[edit]

After Ceppos' column, the Mercury News spent the next several months conducting an internal review of the story. The review was conducted primarily by editor Jonathan Krim and reporter Pete Carey, who had written the paper's first published analysis of the series. Carey ultimately decided that there were problems with several parts of the story and wrote a draft article incorporating his findings.[43]

The paper also gave Webb permission to visit Central America again to get more evidence supporting the story.[44] By January, Webb filed drafts of four more articles based on his trip to Central America, but his editors concluded that the new articles would not help shore up the original series claims.[45]

The editors met with Webb several times in February to discuss the results of the paper's internal review, and eventually decided to print neither Carey's draft article nor the stories Webb had filed.[46] Webb was allowed to keep working on the story and made one more trip to Nicaragua in March. At the end of March, however, Ceppos told Webb that he was going to present the internal review findings in a column.[47] After discussions with Webb, the column was published on May 11, 1997.[48]

In the column Ceppos continued to defend parts of the article, writing that the series had "solidly documented" that the drug ring described in the series did have connections with the Contras and did sell large quantities of cocaine in inner-city Los Angeles.

But, Ceppos wrote, the series "did not meet our standards" in four areas. 1) It presented only one interpretation of conflicting evidence and in one case "did not include information that contradicted a central assertion of the series." 2) The series' estimates of the money involved was presented as fact instead of an estimate. 3) The series oversimplified how the crack epidemic grew. 4) the series "created impressions that were open to misinterpretation" through "imprecise language and graphics."[49]

Ceppos noted that Webb did not agree with these conclusions. He concluded: "How did these shortcomings occur? ... I believe that we fell short at every step of our process: in the writing, editing and production of our work. Several people here share that burden ... But ultimately, the responsibility was, and is, mine."

Webb's resignation[edit]

Offered a choice between working in San Jose under editorial supervision or spot reporting in Cupertino, Webb chose Cupertino.

Federal investigation results[edit]

The reports of the three federal investigations into the claims of "Dark Alliance" were not released until over a year after the series' publication. The reports rejected the series' main claims, but were critical of some CIA and law enforcement actions.

Justice Department report[edit]

The Department of Justice Inspector-General's report was released on July 23, 1998. According to the report's "Epilogue," the report was completed in December 1997, but was not released because the DEA was still attempting to use Danilo Blandon in an investigation of international drug dealers, and was concerned that the report would affect the viability of the investigation. When Attorney General Janet Reno determined that a delay was no longer necessary, the report was released unchanged.[50]

The report covered actions by Department of Justice employees in the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the DEA, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, and U.S. Attorneys' Offices. It found that "the allegations contained in the original Mercury News articles were exaggerations of the actual facts." After examining the investigations and prosecutions of the main figures in the series, Blandon, Meneses, Ross, it concluded: "Although the investigations suffered from various problems of communication and coordination, their successes and failures were determined by the normal dynamics that affect the success of scores of investigations of high-level drug traffickers … These factors, rather than anything as spectacular as a systematic effort by the CIA or any other intelligence agency to protect the drug trafficking activities of Contra supporters, determined what occurred in the cases we examined."[51]

It also concluded that "the claims that Blandon and Meneses were responsible for introducing crack cocaine into South Central Los Angeles and spreading the crack epidemic throughout the country were unsupported." Although it did find that both men were major drug dealers, "guilty of enriching themselves at the expense of countless drug users," and that they had contributed money to the Contra cause, "we did not find that their activities were responsible for the crack cocaine epidemic in South Central Los Angeles, much less the rise of crack throughout the nation, or that they were a significant source of support for the Contras."

The report called several of its findings "troubling." It found that Blandon received permanent resident status "in a wholly improper manner," and that for some time the Department "was not certain whether to prosecute Meneses, or use him as a cooperating witness." Regarding issues raised in the series' shorter sidebar stories, it found that some in the government were "not eager" to have DEA agent Celerino Castillo "openly probe" activities at Ilopango Airport in El Salvador, where covert operations in support of the Contras were undertaken, and that the CIA had indeed intervened in a case involving smuggler Julio Zavala. It concluded, however, that these problems were "a far cry from the type of broad manipulation and corruption of the federal criminal justice system suggested by the original allegations."

CIA report[edit]

The CIA Inspector-General's report was issued in two volumes. The first one, "The California Story", was issued in a classified version on December 17, 1997, and in an unclassified version on January 29, 1998. The second volume, "The Contra Story," was issued in a classified version on April 27, 1998, and in an unclassified version on October 8, 1998.

According to the report, the Inspector-General's office (OIG) examined all information the agency had "relating to CIA knowledge of drug trafficking allegations in regard to any person directly or indirectly involved in Contra activities." It also examined "how CIA handled and responded to information regarding allegations of drug trafficking" by people involved in Contra activities or support.[52]

The first volume of the report found no evidence that "any past or present employee of CIA, or anyone acting on behalf of CIA, had any direct or indirect dealing" with Ross, Blandon, or Meneses, or that any of the other figures mentioned in "Dark Alliance" were ever employed by or associated with or contacted by the agency.[53]

It found nothing to support the claim that "the drug trafficking activities of Blandon and Meneses were motivated by any commitment to support the Contra cause or Contra activities undertaken by CIA." It noted that Blandon and Meneses claimed to have donated money to Contra sympathizers in Los Angeles, but found no information to confirm that it was true or that the agency had heard of it.[53]

It found no information to support the claim that the agency interfered with law enforcement actions against Ross, Blandon or Meneses.[53]

House committee report[edit]

The House Intelligence Committee issued its report in February, 2000.[54] According to the report, it used Webb’s reporting and writing as "key resources in focusing and refining the investigation." Like the CIA and Justice Department reports, it also found that neither Blandon, Meneses, nor Ross were associated with the CIA.[55]

Examining the support that Meneses and Blandon gave to the local Contra organization in San Francisco, the report concluded that it was "not sufficient to finance the organization" and did not consist of 'millions', contrary to the claims of the "Dark Alliance" series. This support "was not directed by anyone within the Contra movement who had an association with the CIA," and the Committee found "no evidence that the CIA or the Intelligence Community was aware of these individuals’ support."[55] It also found no evidence to support Webb's suggestion that several other drug smugglers mentioned in the series were associated with the CIA, or that anyone associated with the CIA or other intelligence agencies was involved in supplying or selling drugs in Los Angeles.[55]

Dark Alliance book[edit]

Main article: Dark Alliance

After his resignation from the Mercury News, Webb expanded the "Dark Alliance" series into a book which responded to the criticism of the series, and described his experiences writing the story and dealing with the controversy. It was published in 1998 as Dark Alliance: The CIA, the Contras, and the Crack Cocaine Explosion. A revised version was published in 1999 which incorporated Webb's response to the CIA and Justice Department reports. The February 2000 report by the House Intelligence Committee in turn considered the book's claims as well as the series' claims.[56]

Webb's later views[edit]

In interviews after leaving the Mercury News, Webb described the 1997 controversy as media manipulation. "The government side of the story is coming through the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, the Washington Post", he stated. "They use the giant corporate press rather than saying anything directly. If you work through friendly reporters on major newspapers, it comes off as The New York Times saying it and not a mouthpiece of the CIA."[57] Webb's longest response to the controversy was in "The Mighty Wurlitzer Plays On", a chapter Webb contributed to an award-winning anthology of press criticism:[58]

If we had met five years ago, you wouldn't have found a more staunch defender of the newspaper industry than me ... And then I wrote some stories that made me realize how sadly misplaced my bliss had been. The reason I'd enjoyed such smooth sailing for so long hadn't been, as I'd assumed, because I was careful and diligent and good at my job ... The truth was that, in all those years, I hadn't written anything important enough to suppress ...

— Gary Webb

Later career and suicide[edit]

After leaving the Mercury News, Webb worked as an investigator for the California State Legislature. His assignments included investigating racial profiling by the California Highway Patrol and charges that the Oracle Corporation had received a no-bid contract award of $95 million in 2001.[59] While working at the Legislature, Webb continued to do free-lance investigative reporting, sometimes based on his investigative work, such as an article on racial profiling in traffic stops which appeared in Esquire magazine in April 1999.[60]

Webb later moved to the Legislature's Office of Majority Services. He was laid off in February 2004 when Assembly Member Fabian Núñez was elected Speaker.[61] In August 2004 he joined the Sacramento News & Review, an alternative weekly newspaper, where he continued doing investigative writing. One of his last articles examined America's Army, a video game designed by the U.S. Army.[62]

Gary Webb committed suicide on December 10, 2004. He was found dead in his Carmichael home with two gunshot wounds to the head.[63] After a local paper reported that he had died from multiple gunshots, the Sacramento County coroner's office received so many calls asking about Webb's death that Sacramento County Coroner Robert Lyons issued a statement confirming Webb had committed suicide.[64] When asked by local reporters about the possibility of two gunshots being a suicide, Lyons replied: "It's unusual in a suicide case to have two shots, but it has been done in the past, and it is in fact a distinct possibility." News coverage noted that there were widespread rumors on the internet at the time that Webb had been killed as retribution for his 'Dark Alliance' series, published eight years before, but Webb's former wife Susan Bell told reporters that she believed Webb had committed suicide.[64] "The way he was acting it would be hard for me to believe it was anything but suicide," Bell said. According to Bell, Webb had been unhappy for some time over his inability to get a job at another major newspaper. He had sold his house the week before his death because he was unable to afford the mortgage.

After Webb's death, a collection of his stories from before and after the "Dark Alliance" series was published. The collection, The Killing Game: Selected Stories from the Author of Dark Alliance, was edited by Webb's son, Eric Webb.

Views on Webb's journalism[edit]

Views on Webb's journalism have been both strongly positive and negative. During and immediately after the controversy over "Dark Alliance," Webb's earlier writing was examined closely. A January 1997 article in American Journalism Review noted that a 1994 series Webb wrote had also been the subject of a Mercury News internal review that criticized Webb's reporting.[65] A New York Times profile of Webb in June 1997 noted that two of his series written for the Cleveland Plain Dealer had resulted in lawsuits that the paper had settled.[66]

On the other hand, in addition to the numerous prizes Webb's work received, many of the writers and editors who worked with him have had high praise for him. Walter Bogdanich, a Pulitzer-prize winning reporter who worked with Webb on the Plain Dealer, told American Journalism Review editor Susan Paterno "He was brilliant; he knew more about public records than anybody I've ever known."[67] Mary Anne Sharkey, Webb's editor at Plain Dealer, told writer Alicia Shepard in 1997 that Webb was known as 'the carpenter' "because he had everything nailed down. Gary's documentation is awesome and his work ethic is unbelievable."[65]

Jonathan Krim, the Mercury News editor who recruited Webb from the Plain Dealer, and who supervised the Mercury News internal review of "Dark Alliance," told AJR editor Paterno that Webb "had all the qualities you'd want in a reporter: curious, dogged, a very high sense of wanting to expose wrongdoing and to hold private and public officials accountable." But as Krim also told Webb's biographer Nick Schou, "The zeal that helped make Gary a relentless reporter was coupled with an inability to question himself, to entertain the notion that he might have erred."[68] Scott Herhold, Webb’s first editor at the Mercury-News, wrote in a 2013 column that "Gary Webb was a journalist of outsized talent. Few reporters I've known could match his nose for an investigative story. When he was engaged, he worked hard. He wrote well. But Webb had one huge blind side: He was fundamentally a man of passion, not of fairness. When facts didn't fit his theory, he tended to shove them to the sidelines."[69]

Views on "Dark Alliance" series[edit]

Webb's reporting in "Dark Alliance" remains controversial. Many writers discussing the series point to errors in it. The claim that the drug ring of Meneses-Blandon-Ross sparked the "crack explosion" has been perhaps the most criticized part of the series. Nick Schou, a journalist who wrote a 2006 biography of Webb, has claimed that this was the most important error in the series. Writing on the Los Angeles Times opinion page, Schou said, "Webb asserted, improbably, that the Blandon-Meneses-Ross drug ring opened 'the first pipeline between Colombia's cocaine cartels and the black neighborhoods of Los Angeles,' helping to 'spark a crack explosion in urban America.' The story offered no evidence to support such sweeping conclusions, a fatal error that would ultimately destroy Webb, if not his editors."[70]

While finding this part of the series unsupported, Schou said that some of the series' claims on CIA involvement are supported, writing that "The CIA conducted an internal investigation that acknowledged in March 1998 that the agency had covered up Contra drug trafficking for more than a decade." According to Schou, the investigation "confirmed key chunks of Webb's allegations." In a later article in the LA Weekly, Schou wrote that Webb was "vindicated by a 1998 CIA Inspector General report, which revealed that for more than a decade the agency had covered up a business relationship it had with Nicaraguan drug dealers like Blandón."[71]

Writing after Webb's death in 2005, The Nation magazine's former Washington Editor David Corn said that Webb "was on to something but botched part of how he handled it." According to Corn, Webb "was wrong on some important details, but he was, in a way, closer to the truth than many of his establishment media critics who neglected the story of the real CIA-contra-cocaine connection." Like Schou, Corn cites the inspector general's report, which he says "acknowledged that the CIA had indeed worked with suspected drugrunners while supporting the contras."[72]

Not all writers agree that the Inspector-General's report supported the series' claims. Jeff Leen, assistant managing editor at the Washington Post for investigative reporting, wrote in a 2014 opinion page article that "the report found no CIA relationship with the drug ring Webb had written about." Leen, who covered the cocaine trade for the Miami Herald in the 1980s, rejects the claim that "because the report uncovered an agency mind-set of indifference to drug-smuggling allegations", it vindicated Webb's reporting.[73]

Peter Kornbluh, a researcher at George Washington University's National Security Archives, also does not agree that the report vindicated the series. Noting that most of the activities discussed in the report had nothing to do with the people Webb reported on, Kornbluh told Webb's biographer Nick Schou, "I can't say it's a vindication. It was good that his story forced those reports to come out, but part of what made that happen was based on misleading information."[74]

Film[edit]

In October 2014, a movie based on Webb's life was released. The movie Kill the Messenger was based on Webb's book Dark Alliance and Nick Schou's biography of Webb.

See also[edit]

Endnotes[edit]

  1. ^ Schou, Nick (2006). Kill the Messenger: How the CIA's Crack Cocaine Controversy Destroyed Gary Webb. Nation Books. ISBN 1-56025-930-2. , 13-14.
  2. ^ Schou 2006, 15-16.
  3. ^ Schou 2006, 22.
  4. ^ Schou 2006, 20-21.
  5. ^ Schou 2006, 27-29.
  6. ^ Schou 2006, 33.
  7. ^ Webb 2011, "The Coal Connection"
  8. ^ "1980 IRE Award winners". Investigative Reporters and Editors. Retrieved 2015-01-27. 
  9. ^ Webb 2011, "Doctoring the Truth."
  10. ^ Porter, S. (October 1986). "The Ohio State Medical Board. An interim report". The Ohio State Medical Journal 82 (10): 677–683. ISSN 0030-1124. PMID 3785826. 
  11. ^ Paterno 2005, 26.
  12. ^ Schou 2006, 54-55.
  13. ^ Webb 2011, "Caltrans Ignored Elevated Freeway Safety."
  14. ^ "General News Reporting". The Pulitzer Prizes. Retrieved 2013-11-09.
  15. ^ Schou 2006, 65.
  16. ^ There is an archived version of the website on the Wayback Machine which includes the original series, later updates, and other coverage of the story.
  17. ^ Schou 2006, 107
  18. ^ Webb, Gary (1996-08-18). "America's 'crack' plague has roots in Nicaragua war". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved 2015-02-05. 
  19. ^ Webb, Gary (1996-08-19). "Shadowy origins of 'crack' epidemic". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved 2015-02-06. 
  20. ^ Webb, Gary (1996-08-20). "War on drugs has unequal impact on black Americans". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved 2015-02-05. 
  21. ^ Many of these are in the series archive at "Dark Alliance: Update archive". 1996-12-20. Retrieved 2015-02-08. 
  22. ^ Schou 2006, 112
  23. ^ Schou 2006, 116.
  24. ^ Schou 2006, 115
  25. ^ "Los Angeles Sherrif's Department Inquiry Findings". San Jose Mercury News - Dark Alliance library. 1996-12-10. Retrieved 2015-02-11. 
  26. ^ Suro, Roberto; Walter Pincus (Oct 4, 1996). "The CIA and Crack: Evidence Is Lacking Of Alleged Plot". Washington Post. 
  27. ^ This is discussed briefly in Schou 2006, 86.
  28. ^ Golden, Tim (1996-10-21). "Though Evidence Is Thin, Tale of C.I.A. and Drugs Has a Life of Its Own". New York Times. Retrieved 2015-01-27. 
  29. ^ Golden, Tim (1996-10-21). "Pivotal Figures of Newspaper Series May Be Only Bit Players". New York Times. Retrieved 2015-01-27. 
  30. ^ Katz, Jesse (1996-10-20). "Tracking the Genesis of the Crack Trade". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2015-01-29. 
  31. ^ McManus, Doyle (1996-10-21). "Examining Charges of CIA Role in Crack Sales". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2015-01-29. 
  32. ^ Mitchell, John L.; Sam Fulwood (1996-10-22). "History Fuels Outrage Over Crack Allegations". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2015-01-30. 
  33. ^ a b Ceppos, Jerry (Oct 18, 1996). "Mercury News Executive Editor Jerry Ceppos' Letter to the Washington Post". Dark Alliance: library. Retrieved 2015-02-15. 
  34. ^ "Washington Post response to Mercury News Executive Editor Jerry Ceppos". Oct 24, 1996. Retrieved 2015-02-15. 
  35. ^ Carey, Pete (Oct 13, 1996). "'Dark Alliance' series takes on a life of its own". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved 2015-02-05. 
  36. ^ Schou 2006, 149.
  37. ^ Schou 2006, 153.
  38. ^ Ceppos, Jerry (Nov 3, 1996). "Perspective: In the eye of the storm". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved 2015-02-05. 
  39. ^ "The CIA and Drugs". The New York Times. 1996-11-05. Retrieved 2015-02-15. 
  40. ^ Overholser, Geneva (1996-11-10). "The CIA, Drugs And the Press". Washington Post. 
  41. ^ Weinberg, Steve (Nov 17, 1996). "Despite critics, a good story Crack and the contras". Baltimore Sun. Retrieved 2015-02-16. 
  42. ^ Shepard, Alicia C. (Feb 1997). "The web that Gary spun". American Journalism Review 19 (1). pp. 34–. Retrieved 2015-02-04. 
  43. ^ Schou 2006, 153-156.
  44. ^ Schou 2006, 152.
  45. ^ Schou 2006, 158.
  46. ^ Schou 2006, 156.
  47. ^ Schou 2006, 158.
  48. ^ Schou 2006, 160.
  49. ^ Ceppos, Jerry (1997-05-11). "To readers of our 'Dark Alliance' series". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved 2015-02-11. 
  50. ^ Bromwich, Michael R. "CIA-Contra-Crack Cocaine Controversy: Epilogue". Retrieved 2015-02-09. 
  51. ^ Bromwich, Michael R. "CIA-Contra-Crack Cocaine Controversy: Conclusions". Retrieved 2015-02-09. 
  52. ^ Hitz, "Scope of investigation."
  53. ^ a b c Hitz, Vol. 1, "Conclusions."
  54. ^ United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (Feb 2000). Report On the Central Intelligence Agency's Alleged Involvement in Crack Cocaine Trafficking in the Los Angeles Area. 
  55. ^ a b c "Report on Alleged Involvement: Findings" 43.
  56. ^ "Report on Alleged Involvement", 2.
  57. ^ Osborn, Barbara Bliss (Mar./Apr. 1998). "Are You Sure You Want to Ruin Your Career?". Extra!. Retrieved 2006-07-21.
  58. ^ Webb, Gary (2002). "The Mighty Wurlitzer Plays On". In Borjesson, Kristina. Into the Buzzsaw: Leading Journalists Expose the Myth of a Free Press. Prometheus Books. pp. 141–157. ISBN 1-57392-972-7. 
  59. ^ Schou 2006 196-200
  60. ^ "DWB (Driving While Black)", Webb 2011.
  61. ^ Schou 2006, 206.
  62. ^ "The Killing Game", Webb 2011
  63. ^ According to a description of Webb's injuries in the Los Angeles Times, he shot himself with a .38 revolver, which he placed near his right ear. The first shot went through his face, and exited at his left cheek. The coroner's staff concluded that the second shot hit an artery. Daunt, Tina (March 16, 2005). "Written In Pain". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2015-01-29. 
  64. ^ a b Stanton, Sam (December 15, 2004). "Reporter's suicide confirmed by coroner". The Sacramento Bee. Archived from the original on May 7, 2008. 
  65. ^ a b Shepard, Alicia C. (Jan 1997). "A Hard-charging reporter". American Journalism Review 19 (1). p. 39. ISSN 1067-8654. Retrieved 2015-02-04. 
  66. ^ Peterson, Iver (June 3, 1997). "Repercussions From Flawed News Articles". New York Times. Retrieved 2015-01-27. . The details of the suits and settlements are discussed in Schou 2006, 48 and 51.
  67. ^ Paterno 2005
  68. ^ Schou 2006, 228.
  69. ^ Herhold, Scott (2 October 2013). "Herhold: Thinking back on journalist Gary Webb and the CIA". San Jose Mercury News.  (Archive)
  70. ^ Schou, Nick (August 18, 2006). "The truth in 'Dark Alliance'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2011-04-05. 
  71. ^ "Ex-L.A. Times Writer Apologizes for "Tawdry" Attacks" Los Angeles Weekly. May 30, 2013. Retrieved on Feb 15, 2015
  72. ^ Corn, David (2004-12-13). "Gary Webb Is Dead". The Nation - Capital Games. Retrieved 2015-01-25. 
  73. ^ Leen, Jeff (2014-10-17). "Gary Webb was no journalism hero, despite what ‘Kill the Messenger’ says". Washington Post. Retrieved 2015-01-27. 
  74. ^ Schou 2006, 185-6.

References[edit]

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]