Gautschi's inequality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In real analysis, a branch of mathematics, Gautschi's inequality is an inequality for ratios of gamma functions. It is due to Walter Gautschi.

Statement[edit]

Let x be a positive real number, and let s ∈ (0, 1). Then[1]

History[edit]

In 1948, Wendel proved the inequalities

for x > 0 and s ∈ (0, 1).[2] He used this to determine the asymptotic behavior of a ratio of gamma functions. The upper bound in this inequality is stronger than the one given above.

In 1959, Gautschi independently proved two inequalities for ratios of gamma functions. His lower bounds were identical to Wendel's. One of his upper bounds was the one given in the statement above, while the other one was sometimes stronger and sometimes weaker than Wendel's.

Consequences[edit]

An immediate consequence is the following description of the asymptotic behavior of ratios of gamma functions:

Proofs[edit]

There are several known proofs of Gautschi's inequality. One simple proof is based on the strict logarithmic convexity of Euler's gamma function. By definition, this means that for every u and v and every t ∈ (0, 1), we have

Apply this inequality with u = x, v = x + 1, and t = 1 − s. Also apply it with u = x + s, v = x + s + 1, and t = s. The resulting inequalities are:

Rearranging the first of these gives the lower bound, while rearranging the second and applying the trivial estimate gives the upper bound.

Related inequalities[edit]

A survey of inequalities for ratios of gamma functions was written by Qi.[3]

The proof by logarithmic convexity gives the stronger upper bound

Gautschi's original paper proved a different stronger upper bound,

where is the digamma function. Neither of these upper bounds is always stronger than the other.[4]

Kershaw proved two tighter inequalities. Again assuming that x > 0 and s ∈ (0, 1),[5]

Gautschi's inequality is specific to a quotient of gamma functions evaluated at two real numbers having a small difference. However, there are extensions to other situations. If x and y are positive real numbers, then the convexity of leads to the inequality:[6]

For s ∈ (0, 1), this leads to the estimates

A related but weaker inequality can be easily derived from the mean value theorem and the monotonicity of .[7]

A more explicit inequality valid for a wider class of arguments is due to Kečkić and Vasić, who proved that if y > x > 1, then:[8]

In particular, for s ∈ (0, 1), we have:

Guo, Qi, and Srivastava proved a similar-looking inequality, valid for all y > x > 0:[9]

For s ∈ (0, 1), this leads to:

References[edit]

  1. ^ NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, 5.6.4.
  2. ^ J.G. Wendel, Note on the Gamma function, Amer. Math. Monthly 55 (9) (1948) 563–564.
  3. ^ Feng Qi, Bounds for the Ratio of Two Gamma Functions, Journal of Inequalities and Applications, Volume 2010, doi:10.1155/2010/493058.
  4. ^ Feng Qi, Bounds for the ratio of two Gamma functions, J. Inequal. Appl. (2010) 1–84.
  5. ^ D. Kershaw, Some extensions of W. Gautschi’s inequalities for the gamma function, Math. Comp. 41 (1983) 607–611.
  6. ^ M. Merkle, Conditions for convexity of a derivative and applications to the Gamma and Digamma function, Facta Universitatis (Niš), Ser. Math. Inform. 16 (2001), 13-20.
  7. ^ A. Laforgia, P. Natalini, Exponential, gamma and polygamma functions: Simple proofs of classical and new inequalities, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 407 (2013), 495–504.
  8. ^ J. D. Kečkić and P. M. Vasić, Some inequalities for the gamma function, Publications de l’Institut Mathématique, vol. 11 (25), pp. 107–114, 1971.
  9. ^ S. Guo, F. Qi, and H. M. Srivastava, Necessary and sufficient conditions for two classes of functions to be logarithmically completely monotonic, Integral Transforms and Special Functions, vol. 18, no. 11-12, pp. 819–826, 2007, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10652460701528933.
  • Gautschi Walter, (1959), Some Elementary Inequalities Relating to the Gamma and Incomplete Gamma Function, Journal of Mathematics and Physics, 38, doi:10.1002/sapm195938177.