Gelfond's constant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, Gelfond's constant, named after Aleksandr Gelfond, is eπ, that is, e raised to the power π. Like both e and π, this constant is a transcendental number. This was first established by Gelfond and may now be considered as an application of the Gelfond–Schneider theorem, noting that

where i is the imaginary unit. Since i is algebraic but not rational, eπ is transcendental. The constant was mentioned in Hilbert's seventh problem.[1] A related constant is 22, known as the Gelfond–Schneider constant. The related value π + eπ is also irrational.[2]

Numerical value[edit]

The decimal expansion of Gelfond's constant begins

23.1406926327792690057290863679485473802661062426002119934450464095243423506904527835169719970675492196...   OEISA039661

Construction[edit]

If one defines k0 = 1/2 and

for n > 0, then the sequence[3]

converges rapidly to eπ.

Continued fraction expansion[edit]

This is based on the digits for the simple continued fraction:

As given by the integer sequence A058287.

Geometric property[edit]

The volume of the n-dimensional ball (or n-ball), is given by

where R is its radius, and Γ is the gamma function. Any even-dimensional ball has volume

and, summing up all the unit-ball (R = 1) volumes of even-dimension gives[4]

Similar or related constants[edit]

Ramanujan's constant[edit]

This is known as Ramanujan's constant. It is an application of Heegner numbers, where 163 is the Heegner number in question.

Similar to eπ - π, eπ163 is very close to an integer:

262537412640768743.9999999999992500725971981856888793538563373369908627075374103782106479101186073129...

As it was the Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan who first predicted this almost-integer number, it has been named after him, though the number was first discovered by the French mathematician Charles Hermite in 1859.

The coincidental closeness, to within 0.000 000 000 000 75 of the number 6403203 + 744 is explained by complex multiplication and the q-expansion of the j-invariant, specifically:

and,

where O(e-π163) is the error term,

which explains why eπ163 is 0.000 000 000 000 75 below 6403203 + 744.

(For more detail on this proof, consult the article on Heegner numbers.)

The number eπ - π[edit]

The decimal expansion of eπ - π is given by A018938:

19.9990999791894757672664429846690444960689368432251061724701018172165259444042437848889371717254321516...

Despite this being nearly the integer 20, no explanation has been given for this fact and it is believed to be a mathematical coincidence.

The number πe[edit]

The decimal expansion of πe is given by A059850:

22.4591577183610454734271522045437350275893151339966922492030025540669260403991179123185197527271430315...

It is not known whether or not this number is transcendental. Note that, by Gelfond-Schneider theorem, we can only infer definitively that ab is transcendental if a is algebraic and b is not rational (a and b are both considered complex numbers, also a ≠ 0, a ≠ 1).

In the case of eπ, we are only able to prove this number transcendental due to properties of complex exponential forms, where π is considered the modulus of the complex number eπ, and the above equivalency given to transform it into (-1)-i, allowing the application of Gelfond-Schneider theorem.

πe has no such equivalence, and hence, as both π and e are transcendental, we can make no conclusion about the transcendence of πe.

The number eπ - πe[edit]

As with πe, it is not known whether eπ - πe is transcendental. Further, no proof exists to show whether or not it is irrational.

The decimal expansion for eπ - πe is given by A063504:

0.6815349144182235323019341634048123526767911086035197442420438554574163102913348711984522443404061881...

The number ii[edit]

The decimal expansion of is given by A049006:

0.2078795763507619085469556198349787700338778416317696080751358830554198772854821397886002778654260353...

Because of the equivalence, we can use Gelfond-Schneider theorem to prove that the reciprocal square root of Gelfond's constant is also transcendental:

i is both algebraic (a solution to the polynomial x2 + 1 = 0), and not rational, hence ii is transcendental.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Tijdeman, Robert (1976). "On the Gel'fond–Baker method and its applications". In Felix E. Browder (ed.). Mathematical Developments Arising from Hilbert Problems. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics. XXVIII.1. American Mathematical Society. pp. 241–268. ISBN 0-8218-1428-1. Zbl 0341.10026.
  2. ^ Nesterenko, Y (1996). "Modular Functions and Transcendence Problems". Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série I. 322 (10): 909–914. Zbl 0859.11047.
  3. ^ Borwein, J.; Bailey, D. (2004). Mathematics by Experiment: Plausible Reasoning in the 21st Century. Wellesley, MA: A K Peters. p. 137. ISBN 1-56881-211-6. Zbl 1083.00001.
  4. ^ Connolly, Francis. University of Notre Dame[full citation needed]

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]