General of the Armies
|General of the Armies|
of the United States
|Service branch||United States Army|
|Formation||September 3, 1919|
|Next higher rank||None|
|Next lower rank||General of the Army|
General of the Armies of the United States, more commonly referred to as General of the Armies, is the most senior military rank in the United States Army. It has been conferred only twice: to John J. Pershing in 1919, as a personal accolade for his command of the American Expeditionary Forces during World War I; and to George Washington in 1976, as a posthumous honor during the United States Bicentennial celebrations.
The grade is sometimes speculated to be a six-star general, as being senior to the five-star grade of general of the Army, but no six-star insignia was ever officially created and Pershing, the only person to be General of the Armies during his own lifetime, never wore more than four stars. Whether Pershing's grade should rank as four, five, or six stars has been a subject of debate ever since the five-star grades were created in 1944. To make Washington unambiguously the highest ranking Army officer in 1976, Congress specified that his new grade of General of the Armies ranked above all other grades of the Army, past or present.
The General of the Armies enjoyed several privileges not afforded to other generals, including a much higher salary and the right to retire at full pay and allowances. Even in retirement, Pershing was the second-highest-paid official in the federal government, after only the President of the United States.
Attempt to appoint Washington
The office of "General of the Armies of the United States" was created by an Act of Congress on March 3, 1799, which stated:
That a commander of the army of the United States shall be appointed and commissioned by the style of "General of the Armies of the United States," and the present office and title of Lieutenant-General shall thereafter be abolished.
The law was intended to elevate George Washington, who was then a lieutenant general commanding the provisional army being organized to fight the Quasi-War against France, but President John Adams never made the appointment, thinking it would infringe on his constitutional functions. Washington died on December 14, 1799, and the grade lapsed on March 16, 1802, when not mentioned in the law that defined the peacetime military establishment.
American Civil War
After the American Civil War, Congress honored Ulysses S. Grant for his successful command of the Union Army by authorizing his promotion to the grade of general under the Act of July 25, 1866, which stated:
That the grade of "general of the army of the United States" be, and the same is hereby, revived....
Despite being titled "General of the Army" instead of "General of the Armies", the Comptroller General of the United States would rule in 1924 that the grade revived in 1866 for Grant (and later William T. Sherman and Philip H. Sheridan) was the same grade that had been created for Washington in 1799 and revived for Pershing in 1919.
It thus appears that the office of general was first created in 1799 by the title of "General of the Armies of the United States;" that it was revived in 1866 as "General of the Army of the United States;" and that it was again revived in 1919 by the title of "General of the Armies of the United States." That it is one and the same office, that of general, is unquestioned.
Pershing would inherit several of his unique perquisites as General of the Armies through this legislative continuity with the Grant, Sherman, and Sheridan grade, including a much higher salary than other generals and the right to retire at full pay instead of three-quarters pay.
John J. Pershing (1919)
During World War I, Congress authorized the ex officio grade of general for the chief of staff of the Army and the commander of the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) in France, but only during the wartime emergency. Unlike the 1866 grade, which was a permanent personal appointment, the 1917 grade was only held while occupying a specific office. Army chief of staff Tasker H. Bliss and AEF commander John J. Pershing were commissioned emergency generals on October 8, 1917, with Peyton C. March succeeding Bliss as chief of staff and emergency general on May 20, 1918.
Attempt to appoint March with Pershing
When the war ended, Pershing and March were due to lose their emergency grades and revert to major general, so on June 18, 1919, President Woodrow Wilson asked Congress to promote both men to permanent general in a way that gave Pershing precedence over March. Six weeks later, the House Military Affairs Committee reported out two bills authorizing Pershing and March to each be appointed General of the Armies. To ensure that Pershing would outrank March, Pershing's bill also repealed the 1917 law that gave the Army chief of staff precedence over all other Army officers.
Congress and Pershing both opposed March's promotion, having clashed with him during the war, so March's bill did not pass and he reverted to major general. He was later advanced to general on the retired list.
On September 3, 1919, President Wilson signed Public Law 66-45, providing:
That the office of General of the Armies of the United States is hereby revived...[for] a general officer of the Army who, on foreign soil and during the recent war, has been especially distinguished in the higher command of military forces of the United States...and any provision of existing law that would enable any other officer of the Army to take rank and precedence over said officer is hereby repealed....
The bill had been rushed through Congress in only two days so that Secretary of War Newton D. Baker could hand Pershing his new commission as soon as he arrived from France on September 8, when his emergency grade would expire.
In the haste to promote Pershing, Wilson accidentally nominated him to be a general in the Army instead of a General of the Armies, a difference that could have cost Pershing half his income when he retired.
Official Army publications subsequently took care to spell out Pershing's title as General of the Armies, as distinct from the emergency generals of 1917 and the rank of general that was held by the chief of staff of the Army after 1929. In 1928, Secretary of War Dwight F. Davis even increased the 17-gun salute authorized for a General of the Armies to the 19 guns of a European field marshal.
Continued privileges during retirement
Pershing transferred to the retired list on September 12, 1924, but continued to draw full pay and allowances, a privilege not granted to other generals.
Even after retiring, the General of the Armies maintained a spacious office in the old State, War, and Navy Building until it was relocated to the Pentagon in 1947, years after ill health had permanently confined Pershing to Walter Reed General Hospital. In 1939, Congress created the office of military secretary to the General of the Armies with the rank of colonel so Pershing's longtime aide, Captain George E. Adamson, could continue to manage Pershing's affairs after his own retirement.
World War II
There were several attempts to appoint senior World War II officers as Generals of the Armies, but none came to fruition.
Attempts to appoint Marshall and Arnold
In August 1943, Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Ernest J. King increased his efforts to create a grade higher than four stars after being outranked by his British counterpart at the First Quebec Conference. The Navy could even be outranked by the Army if Pershing died and Army chief of staff George C. Marshall inherited his title of General of the Armies with its de facto five-star rank, as retired CNO William V. Pratt warned King in January 1944.
Marshall opposed any higher grade, saying he did not need one. King and Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson both suspected that as Pershing's longtime protégé, Marshall would resist any rank equivalent to General of the Armies while his mentor was still alive. Stimson did ask President Franklin D. Roosevelt to appoint Marshall as General of the Armies in September 1943 so he could command the planned invasion of France while remaining chief of staff, but Roosevelt ultimately gave the command to Dwight D. Eisenhower instead.
In February 1944, King's lobbying led both houses of Congress to submit bills reviving the grades of General of the Armies and Admiral of the Navy. King wanted the American Joint Chiefs of Staff to rank with the British field marshals on the Combined Chiefs of Staff, raising both Marshall and Army Air Forces commander Henry H. Arnold to five-star General of the Armies. However, House Naval Affairs Committee chairman Carl Vinson wanted King and Marshall to have even higher rank, so the House bills inserted a five-star fleet admiral below a six-star Admiral of the Navy, which the Army was expected to match with its own five-star grade and a six-star General of the Armies. Even King thought six stars was too much, and public opposition convinced supporters of higher grades to defer legislation until after a successful landing in Europe.
Creation of five-star grade
With the invasion of Europe well underway by September 1944, the War Department finally gave its blessing to a five-star grade on condition that it not be called General of the Armies, a title reserved for the higher rank held by Pershing. In a press conference on September 14, 1944, Stimson said:
I have been asked by members of Congress for the War Department's view on an amendment which will provide for similar advanced army rank. I have advised Congress that the War Department concurs in such proposed action. This concurrence, however, is contingent on the understanding that a distinction will be made between the title conferred by the new advanced rank and the title now accompanying the higher rank of 'The General of the Armies' held by General John J. Pershing.
On December 14, 1944, Public Law 78-482 established the five-star grade of General of the Army, preserving Pershing's status as the only General of the Armies and further stating that nothing would change about the 1919 law that had promoted him:
By specifying that nothing about the General of the Armies would be changed by the law that created the five-star grades, Congress intended Pershing to remain the highest-ranking officer in the Army. This sparked a long-running debate over whether Pershing was now a six-star general; the senior five-star general; or even just a four-star general, as later argued by an influential pair of articles by Frederick Bernays Wiener, who pointed out that the 1919 law that revived his office did not actually say that the General of the Armies outranked all other Army officers, but merely repealed a 1917 law that would have let the Army chief of staff outrank him.
For the rest of Pershing's life, official publications consistently treated the General of the Armies as being one grade higher than a five-star general. As late as 1951, Army regulations specified 19 guns to salute the General of the Armies, and only 17 guns for a General of the Army.
Pershing himself never wore more than four stars. Army regulations let the General of the Armies design his own uniform, but by the time the five-star grade was created in 1944, Pershing was too infirm to consider updating his insignia. When Pershing died on July 15, 1948, a proposal to bury him in a uniform bearing six stars was rejected in favor of the four stars he had always worn.
Attempts to appoint MacArthur
In January 1955, Congressional supporters of General of the Army Douglas MacArthur introduced legislation to appoint him General of the Armies, backdated to his 75th birthday on January 26. The proposal stalled in the House Armed Services Committee after the Defense Department opposed it on the grounds that promoting only MacArthur would downgrade all other five-star officers and "arouse interservice, intraservice and popular misunderstanding and controversies." Another attempt was still pending in Congress when MacArthur died on April 5, 1964.
George Washington (1976)
In September 1953, the New York Times reported that because George Washington had never been appointed General of the Armies in 1799, he remained a lieutenant general who was now outranked by 45 other generals, living and dead. Citing this low rank, Senator Edward Martin introduced a bill in April 1954 to appoint Washington posthumously as General of the Armies.
Twenty-three years later, a veterans group in the district of Representative Mario Biaggi observed that Washington had still not been promoted, prompting Biaggi to sponsor a joint resolution to elevate Washington to General of the Armies as part of the United States Bicentennial celebration in 1976.
When the House Armed Services Committee met to consider the resolution, a committee counsel acknowledged that it was still debatable whether Pershing was ever more than a four-star general, but Representative F. Edward Hébert asserted that the language of this resolution did make Washington a six-star general, saying, "We have three grades—general, General of the Army, and this is General of the Armies of the United States."
Representative Lucien N. Nedzi objected that Washington's stature was already so high that giving him a modern Army rank just made Congress look ridiculous. "It's like having the Pope offer to make Christ a cardinal."
Deeming it "fitting and proper that no officer of the United States Army should outrank Lieutenant General George Washington on the Army list," Public Law 94-479 declared that:
(a) for purposes of subsection (b) of this section only, the grade of General of the Armies of the United States is established, such grade to have rank and precedence over all other grades of the Army, past or present.
(b) The President is authorized and requested to appoint George Washington posthumously to the grade of General of the Armies of the United States, such appointment to take effect on July 4, 1976.
Although President Gerald Ford signed the law on October 11, 1976, no further action was taken to promote Washington until February 1978, when a military driver studying for a promotion board asked his passenger, General Donn A. Starry, whether Washington now outranked Pershing. The specialist five's question to a four-star general triggered a chain of inquiries that caused the Department of the Army to issue Orders 31-3 on March 13, 1978, posthumously promoting Washington to the grade of General of the Armies of the United States, effective from the 200th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1976. When the question was asked again in 1992, the U.S. Army Institute of Heraldry considered Pershing's rank to be equivalent to five stars and junior to Washington.
No insignia was ever officially specified for the General of the Armies, who was allowed to define it for himself.
Upon being appointed General of the Armies in 1919, Pershing continued to wear the four silver stars and gold collar eagle that he had selected for his insignia as a general in 1917, when Army regulations authorized generals to prescribe their own shoulder and collar insignia. Pershing and Generals Tasker H. Bliss and Peyton C. March all chose to wear four silver stars on their shoulders, instead of the previous insignia of two silver stars and a gold eagle. Pershing and Bliss also replaced the regulation bronze "U.S." insignia on their collars with a gold eagle representing the Great Seal of the United States.
In 1937, Pershing created a custom full dress uniform to attend the coronation of George VI and Elizabeth, denoting his rank with four gold stars embroidered on each sleeve. Full dress uniforms for other general officers used silver stars, including the custom uniform that Army chief of staff Malin Craig designed for himself the following year.
Because the General of the Armies prescribed his own insignia, later tradition held that Pershing could have worn as many stars as he wanted. Claimed one expert in 1976, "if a General of the Armies wants to wear six stars, he can. Or seven. Or 10, I guess." The creation of the five-star grades in 1944 led to suggestions that Pershing clarify his seniority by adopting a six-star insignia, but by then he was too ill. When Pershing died in 1948, funeral planners considered affixing a six-star insignia to his uniform, but instead buried him with the four stars he wore in life.
As General of the Armies, Pershing was paid much more than other generals. The 1919 law that promoted Pershing gave the General of the Armies the same annual pay of $13,500 (equivalent to $210,999 in 2021) that was set in 1870 for General William T. Sherman, plus $8,000 (equivalent to $125,036 in 2021) in allowances.
All other generals fell under the Joint Service Pay Readjustment Act of 1922, which set the pay for a major general at $8,000 (equivalent to $129,511 in 2021). Higher ranks had the same pay as a major general plus a personal money allowance of $500 (equivalent to $8,094 in 2021) for a lieutenant general, $2,200 (equivalent to $35,616 in 2021) for a general, or $5,000 (equivalent to $80,944 in 2021) for a general of the Army. Including food and housing, the annual compensation for a general of the Army in December 1944 was $14,951, versus $21,500 for the General of the Armies (respectively equivalent to $230,144 and $330,954 in 2021).
The General of the Armies retired with full pay and allowances, another benefit created for Sherman and inherited by Pershing, who continued to receive $21,500 for the rest of his life. Even in retirement, he drew a higher annual compensation than any other official in the federal government except the President of the United States.
Other generals retired at three-quarters pay and no allowances. When Army chief of staff Charles P. Summerall retired in 1931, his annual compensation fell to only $6,000, three-quarters of a major general's pay.
Starting in 1933, the General of the Armies was allowed to design his own uniform, as were current and former Army chiefs of staff. Pershing used this authority to create the unique uniform he wore to the 1937 coronation of George VI and Elizabeth, styled after the full dress uniform that had been introduced by the Army in 1902 but discontinued in 1917. Whereas the 1902 uniform portrayed the rank of a general officer by embroidering silver stars on each sleeve, Pershing's 1937 uniform sleeves bore four gold stars. When Army chief of staff Malin Craig designed his own custom uniform in 1938, he returned to the usual silver stars.
Pershing's estate donated his General of the Armies uniforms to the Smithsonian Institution, including the 1921 service coat with four silver stars that he wore as Army chief of staff and the 1937 full dress coat with four gold stars that he wore to the coronation.
On March 2, 1899, Congress created the grade of Admiral of the Navy to honor George Dewey for his victory at the Battle of Manila Bay. Only Dewey ever held this grade, which is often treated as the United States Navy equivalent of General of the Armies, although the two grades never overlapped since Dewey died on January 16, 1917, two years before Pershing's appointment.
Admiral of the Navy and General of the Armies were permanent grades awarded as personal accolades for past service, unlike the later ex officio ranks of admiral and general. Both grades carried the same annual pay of $13,500 for life, and the proposal to create more Admirals of the Navy in 1944 continued to tie their compensation to the General of the Armies.
After Dewey was mistakenly nominated to be an admiral in the Navy instead of Admiral of the Navy in 1899 and had to be renominated in 1903, the Navy carefully distinguished between Dewey's grade and the rank of admiral that was held by the three fleet commanders from 1915, and the Chief of Naval Operations from 1916. The Army took similar care to distinguish between Pershing's grade and the rank of general held by the chief of staff of the Army from 1929, after Pershing was mistakenly nominated to be a general in the Army instead of General of the Armies in 1919.
Because Dewey and Pershing were both treated as if they held grades higher than admiral or general, before World War II they were sometimes thought to be on par with a British admiral of the fleet or field marshal. When the five-star grades were created in 1944, the initial legislation called them Admiral of the Navy and General of the Armies. However, House Naval Affairs Committee chairman Carl Vinson inserted a five-star fleet admiral below Admiral of the Navy, which he wanted to be a six-star grade. Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson then required that the five-star Army grade not be called General of the Armies, which he thought was also a higher rank.
Although the 1944 proposal to create six-star grades was dropped, Army and Navy regulations in 1951 still authorized only 17 guns to salute a five-star officer, and 19 guns for an Admiral of the Navy or General of the Armies.
- "How many U.S. Army five-star generals have there been and who were they?". U.S. Army Center of Military History.
- Oliver, Raymond (August 1983). Why is the Colonel Called "Kernal"?. McClellan Air Force Base, California: Office of History, Sacramento Air Logistics Center. p. 20.
- Full Committee Consideration of H.J. Res. 519 to Provide For the Appointment of George Washington to the Grade of General of the Armies of the United States, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, Ninety-Fourth Congress, Second Session, August 3, 1976. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1976. pp. 3–5.
- Public Law 94-479 (90 Stat. 2078)
- "Highest Paid Official, After Hoover, Is Pershing". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Pittsburgh. March 23, 1931. p. 26 – via Newspapers.com.
- Act of March 3, 1799 (1 Stat. 752).
- Andrews, C. C., ed. (1856). "Lieutenant General Scott's Case". Official Opinions of the Attorneys General of the United States. Vol. VII. Washington, D.C.: Robert Farnham. pp. 422–424.
- Act of July 25, 1866 (14 Stat. 223).
- Trask, Roger R. (1996). Defender of the Public Interest: The General Accounting Office, 1921–1966. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. p. 179. ISBN 9780160487286.
- "Army Pay – Retired General (4 Comp. Gen. 317)". Decisions of the Comptroller General of the United States. Vol. 4. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1925. p. 317.
- Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. 410).
- "Are Full Generals Now". The New York Times. New York City. October 9, 1917. p. 5.
- "Rank of General for Bliss and March". The New York Times. New York City. May 21, 1918. p. 6.
- "Wants The Highest Rank For Pershing". The New York Times. New York City. July 19, 1919. p. 5.
- Supplement to the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, Covering the Second Term of Woodrow Wilson, March 4, 1917, to March 4, 1921. Bureau of National Literature. 1921. p. 8761.
- "Report No. 185". House Reports (Public), 66th Congress, 1st Session. Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1919.
- "Report No. 186". House Reports (Public), 66th Congress, 1st Session. Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1919.
- "News of Army and Navy: Precedence of Gen. Pershing Over Chief of Staff Approved by Officers". The Washington Post. Washington, D.C. September 7, 1919. p. 38.
- Act of May 12, 1917 (40 Stat. 46).
- Smythe, Donald (1981). "The Pershing-March Conflict in World War I". Parameters. XI (4): 60.
- Public Law 66-45 (41 Stat. 283)
- "Names Pershing To Permanent Rank". The New York Times. New York City. September 4, 1919. p. 3.
- "General Deeply Moved By Hearty Welcome". The New York Times. New York City. September 9, 1919. p. 2.
- "Confirmation of a General". Army and Navy Journal. New York City. September 20, 1919. p. 76.
- "Gen. Pershing's Pay To Be Cut In Half". The New York Times. New York City. August 19, 1924. p. 19.
- "Pershing's Rank Is 'General Of Armies'". The New York Times. New York City. July 10, 1921. p. 18.
- "Summerall A General". The New York Times. New York City. February 24, 1929. p. 33.
- "19-Gun Salute For Pershing Is Planned". The Boston Globe. Boston, Massachusetts. December 14, 1928. p. 14.
- Moise, George (November 22, 1947). "Gen. Pershing's Office Is Now In The Pentagon". Greensburg Daily News. Greensburg, Indiana. p. 6.
- "Report No. 261". House Reports (Miscellaneous), 76th Congress, 1st Session. Vol. 2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1939.
- Buell (1980), pp. 362–365.
- Pogue (1973), pp. 365–367.
- Pogue (1973), pp. 267, 273.
- "Marshall's Status Examined Before Giving Higher Title". Battle Creek Enquirer. Battle Creek, Michigan. February 5, 1944. p. 2.
- Montgomery, Ruth (September 14, 1944). "Stimson For Higher Rank To Honor Our Top Generals". Daily News. New York City. p. M10.
- Wiener (January 1971), p. 44.
- Public Law 78-482 (58 Stat. 802)
- Pogue (1973), pp. 483–484.
- "5-Star Rank Commanders To Be Made". The Mercury. Pottstown, Pennsylvania. December 9, 1944. p. 2.
- Kleber, Brooks E. (June 1978). "Washington is Now No. 1: The Story Behind a Promotion". Army. pp. 14–15.
- Wiener (December 1970), p. 32. "The final clause was aimed at so much of the Act of 12 May 1917 (40 Stat. 46) as had provided that the chief of staff 'shall take rank and precedence over all other officers of the Army.'"
- Smythe, Donald (1986). Pershing: General of the Armies. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. p. 260.
- Office of the Judge Advocate General of the Army (1950). Military Laws of the United States (Army), 1949 (Ninth ed.). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. pp. 40–42.
- Wiener (January 1971), p. 44. "Paragraph 3 of AR 600-15, from 21 January 1945 until 14 August 1951, listed the three "highest grades of rank" as follows: "a. General of the Armies of the United States; b. General of the Army; c. General.""
- "17 or 19 Gun Salute Argued For MacArthur". Greeley Daily Tribune. Greeley, Colorado. April 17, 1951. p. 2.
- "Pershing's Aide Says General Could Wear Six Stars". Palladium-Item. Richmond, Indiana. April 11, 1945. p. 3.
- Mossman, B. C.; Stark, M. W. (1991). The Last Salute: Civil and Military Funerals, 1921–1969. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army. p. 33.
- Senate Joint Resolution 26 (January 21, 1955).
- "Proposed Honor For MacArthur Stirs Opposition". El Paso Herald-Post. El Paso, Texas. May 10, 1955. p. 12.
- "Oppose MacArthur Promotion". Long Beach Independent. Long Beach, California. May 11, 1955. p. 9.
- Roth, Joseph P. (June 1966). "How High Are The Stars?". Military Review. XLVI (6): 95–100.
- "45 U.S. Officers Outrank George Washington". The New York Times. New York City. September 28, 1953. p. 27.
- Congressional Record. Vol. 100. April 28, 1954. pp. 5656–5657.
- "Washington Gets Star". The New York Times. New York City. October 13, 1976. p. 40.
- "'Promotion' Voted for Washington". The Palm Beach Post. West Palm Beach, Florida. August 26, 1976. p. D16.
- "Mailcall: A six-star general?". ARMY RESERVE Magazine. Washington, D.C.: Chief, U.S. Army Reserve. 38 (4): 6. Winter 1992–93.
- Wiener (November 1945), pp. 51–52. "Pershing, Bliss, and March all went back to the earlier insignia of four stars. Pershing and Bliss both wore the arms of the U. S. in gold on their collars....AR 600-35, October 14, 1921, prescribed one, two, three, and four stars for the several grades of general officers, but continued the provision permitting the General of the Armies and generals to wear such collar insignia as they might prescribe...."
- "Five-Starrers May Not Carry 5-Star Insignia". Daily News. New York City. December 17, 1944. p. 55.
Pershing made only one change to designate his super-title. In place of the "U. S." customarily worn on an officer's collar, he wears a miniature of the Great Seal of the United States.
- "Pershing to Attend Coronation in Snappy Attire of Own Design". Gettysburg Times. Gettysburg, PA. Associated Press. April 28, 1937. p. 2.
- Meixsel, Richard (July 2005). "A Uniform Story". The Journal of Military History. 69 (3): 791–800. doi:10.1353/jmh.2005.0172. S2CID 159484676.
Army regulations had been modified in 1933 to read "[a]ll articles of uniform for wear by the General of the Armies, the Chief of Staff, and a former Chief of Staff are such as each may prescribe for himself" (see AR 600-40, dated 22 June 1931 and change no. 1, dated 21 July 1933).
- "House Panel to Promote Washington". The Tennessean. Nashville, Tennessee. August 4, 1976. p. 11.
- Wiener (November 1945), p. 55. "The present situation is additionally unfortunate in that the retired pay for a Lieutenant General or a General (or for a General of the Army under the 1944 Act) is just exactly the same, penny for penny, as the retired pay of a Major General. This is a consequence of the fact that the pay for all of these grades is the same, while the personal money allowance lapses on retirement."
- Wiener (January 1971), p. 47. "A general of the Army at the pay scale of December 1944 received only $8,000 pay, plus (assuming dependents) a quarters allowance of $1,440 and a subsistence allowance of $511, and, in addition, a personal money allowance of $5,000."
- "Pershing Will Provides Trust Fund Of $150,000 For Sister". Arizona Republic. Phoenix, Arizona. July 22, 1948. p. 3.
- "U. S. Military Rank: Special Army Titles Proposed for Pershing and March". The Gazette. Montreal, Quebec. August 21, 1919. p. 7.
- "Dewey Again Nominated". The New York Times. New York City. March 15, 1903. p. 9.
- "Chapter 11 (Rank, Command, and Duty)". 1913 Navy Regulations (including updates through December 1, 1918). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1913.
- "How Many Stars Does 'Admiral of the Navy' Rate?". All Hands. January 1955. p. 23.
- Buell, Thomas B. (1980). Master of Sea Power: A Biography of Fleet Admiral Ernest J. King. Boston, Massachusetts: Little, Brown and Company.
- Pogue, Forrest C. (1973). George C. Marshall: Organizer of Victory, 1943–1945. New York City: Penguin Books.
- Wiener, Frederick B. (November 1945). "Three Stars and Up: Part Five". Infantry Journal. LVII: 51–55.
- Wiener, Frederick B. (December 1970). "How Many Stars for Pershing?". Army: 28–34.
- Wiener, Frederick B. (January 1971). "Five is Higher Than Six When Fact and Legend Clash". Army: 42–48.