Genocide of indigenous peoples

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The genocide of indigenous peoples is the mass destruction of entire communities of indigenous peoples.[Note 1] Indigenous peoples are understood to be people whose historical and current territory has become occupied by colonial expansion, or the formation of a state by a dominant group such as a colonial power.[1]

While the concept of genocide was formulated by Raphael Lemkin in the mid-20th century, the expansion of various European colonial powers such as the British and Spanish empires and the subsequent establishment of colonies on indigenous territory frequently involved acts of genocidal violence against indigenous groups in the Americas, Australia, Africa and Asia.[2] According to Lemkin, colonization was in itself "intrinsically genocidal". He saw this genocide as a two-stage process, the first being the destruction of the indigenous population's way of life. In the second stage, the newcomers impose their way of life on the indigenous group.[3][4] According to David Maybury-Lewis, imperial and colonial forms of genocide are enacted in two main ways, either through the deliberate clearing of territories of their original inhabitants in order to make them exploitable for purposes of resource extraction or colonial settlements, or through enlisting indigenous peoples as forced laborers in colonial or imperialist projects of resource extraction.[5] The designation of specific events as genocidal is often controversial.[6]

Some scholars, among them Lemkin, have argued that cultural genocide, sometimes called ethnocide, should also be recognized. A people may continue to exist, but if they are prevented from perpetuating their group identity by prohibitions against cultural and religious practices that are the basis of that identity, this may also be considered a form of genocide. Examples include the treatment of Tibetans by the Government of China and Native Americans by the Federal government of the United States.[7][8][9][10]

Genocide debate[edit]

The concept of genocide was defined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin. After World War II, it was adopted by the United Nations in 1948. For Lemkin, genocide was broadly defined and included all attempts to destroy a specific ethnic group, whether strictly physical through mass killings, or cultural or psychological through oppression and destruction of indigenous ways of life.[11]

The UN definition, which is used in international law, is narrower than Lemkin's, and states that genocide is: "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group," as such:[12]

(a) "Killing members of the group;"
(b) "Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;"
(c) "Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;"
(d) "Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;"
(e) "Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

The determination of whether a historical event should be considered genocide can be a matter of scholarly debate. Historians often draw on broader definitions such as Lemkin's, which sees colonialist violence against indigenous peoples as inherently genocidal. For example, in the case of the colonization of the Americas, where the indigenous people of the Americas declined by up to 90% in the first centuries of European colonization, it can be debatable whether genocide occurs when disease is considered the main cause of this decline since the introduction of disease was mostly unintentional.[13] Some genocide scholars separate the population declines due to disease from the genocidal aggression of one group toward another.[14] Some scholars argue that intent of genocide is not necessary, since genocide may be the cumulative result of minor conflicts in which settlers, or colonial or state agents, perpetrate violence against minority groups.[1] Others argue that the dire consequences of European diseases among many New World populations were exacerbated by different forms of genocidal violence, and that intentional and unintentional deaths cannot easily be separated.[15][16] Some scholars regard the colonization of the Americas as genocide, since they argue it was largely achieved through systematically exploiting, removing and destroying specific ethnic groups, even when most deaths were caused by disease and not direct violence from colonizers.[17] In this view, the concept of "manifest destiny" in the westward expansion from the eastern United States can be seen as contributing to genocide. From historical researchers Pereira & Seabrook, Global Parasites:

It still is common practice for [the descendants of colonizers] to blame disease alone for the decimation of Native populations, thus exonerating themselves [and lineage] of any moral blame. However, such deaths were seen, by the Puritans particularly, as the Lord having "cleared our title to what we possess.[18][19]

Indigenous peoples of the Americas (pre-1948)[edit]

Historians and scholars whose work has examined this history in the context of genocide have included historian David Stannard[20] and anthropological demographer Russell Thornton,[21] as well as scholar-activists such as Vine Deloria, Jr., Russell Means and Ward Churchill. Stannard compares the events of colonization in the Americas with the definition of genocide in the 1948 UN convention, and writes that,

In light of the U.N. language—even putting aside some of its looser constructions—it is impossible to know what transpired in the Americas during the sixteenth, seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries and not conclude that it was genocide.[22]

Thornton describes as genocide the direct impact of warfare, violence and massacres, many of which had the effect of wiping out entire ethnic groups.[23] Political scientist Guenter Lewy says that "even if up to 90 percent of the reduction in Indian population was the result of disease, that leaves a sizable death toll caused by mistreatment and violence."[24] Native American Studies professor Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz says,

Proponents of the default position emphasize attrition by disease despite other causes equally deadly, if not more so. In doing so they refuse to accept that the colonization of America was genocidal by plan, not simply the tragic fate of populations lacking immunity to disease.[25]

By 1900, the indigenous population in the Americas declined by more than 80%, and by as much as 98% in some areas. The effects of diseases such as smallpox, measles and cholera during the first century of colonialism contributed greatly to the death toll, while violence, displacement and warfare by colonizers against the Indians contributed to the death toll in subsequent centuries.[26] As detailed in American Philosophy: From Wounded Knee to the Present (2015),

It is also apparent that the shared history of the hemisphere is one framed by the dual tragedies of genocide and slavery, both of which are part of the legacy of the European invasions of the past 500 years. Indigenous people north and south were displaced, died of disease, and were killed by Europeans through slavery, rape, and war. In 1491, about 145 million people lived in the western hemisphere. By 1691, the population of indigenous Americans had declined by 90–95 percent, or by around 130 million people.[27]

According to geographers from University College London, the colonization of the Americas by Europeans killed so many people it resulted in climate change and global cooling.[28] UCL Geography Professor Mark Maslin, one of the co-authors of the study, says the large death toll also boosted the economies of Europe: "the depopulation of the Americas may have inadvertently allowed the Europeans to dominate the world. It also allowed for the Industrial Revolution and for Europeans to continue that domination."[29]

Spanish colonization of the Americas[edit]

A 16th-century illustration by Flemish Protestant Theodor de Bry for Las Casas' Brevisima relación de la destrucción de las Indias, depicting Spanish atrocities during the conquest of Cuba

It is estimated that during the initial Spanish conquest of the Americas up to eight million indigenous people died, primarily through the spread of Afro-Eurasian diseases.,[30] in a series of events that have been described as the first large-scale act of genocide of the modern era.[31] Acts of brutality and systematic annihilation against the Taíno People of the Caribbean prompted Dominican friar Bartolomé de las Casas to write Brevísima relación de la destrucción de las Indias ('A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies') in 1552. Las Casas wrote that the indigenous population on the Spanish colony of Hispaniola had been reduced from 400,000 to 200 in a few decades.[32] His writings were among those that gave rise to Leyenda Negra ('Black Legend') to describe Spanish cruelty in the Indies.[33] Noble David Cook, writing about the Black Legend conquest of the Americas wrote, "There were too few Spaniards to have killed the millions who were reported to have died in the first century after Old and New World contact." He instead estimates that the death toll was caused by diseases like smallpox,[34] which according to some estimates had an 80–90% fatality rate in Native American populations.[35] Conversely, historian Andrés Reséndez at the University of California, Davis asserts that even though disease was a factor, the indigenous population would have rebounded the same way Europeans did following the Black Death if it were not for the constant enslavement they were subject to.[36] He says that "among these human factors, slavery was the major killer" of Hispaniola's population, and that "between 1492 and 1550, a nexus of slavery, overwork and famine killed more Indians in the Caribbean than smallpox, influenza or malaria."[37]

With the initial conquest of the Americas completed, the Spanish implemented the encomienda system between 1503, when it was formally established, and 1542, when it was abolished by the New Laws. In theory, the encomienda placed groups of indigenous peoples under Spanish oversight to foster cultural assimilation and conversion to Catholicism, but in practice led to the legally sanctioned exploitation of natural resources and forced labor under brutal conditions with a high death rate.[38] Though the Spaniards did not set out to exterminate the indigenous peoples, believing their numbers to be inexhaustible, their actions led to the annihilation of entire tribes such as the Arawak.[39] Many Arawaks died from lethal forced labor in the mines, in which a third of workers died every six months.[40] According to historian David Stannard, the encomienda was a genocidal system which "had driven many millions of native peoples in Central and South America to early and agonizing deaths."[41] According to Trafzer, in the 1760s, an expedition dispatched to fortify California, led by Gaspar de Portolà and Junípero Serra, was marked by slavery, forced conversions, and genocide through the introduction of disease.[42]

British colonization of the Americas[edit]

The Kalinago Genocide, 1626[edit]

The Kalinago genocide was the massacre of some 2,000 Island Caribs by English and French settlers in 1628 in St. Kitts.

The Carib Chief Tegremond became uneasy with the increasing number of English and French settlers occupying St. Kitts. This led to confrontations, which led him to plot the settlers' elimination with the aid of other Island Caribs. However, his scheme was betrayed by an Indian woman called Barbe, to Thomas Warner and Pierre Belain d'Esnambuc. Taking action, the English and French settlers invited the Caribs to a party where they became intoxicated. When the Caribs returned to their village, 120 were killed in their sleep, including Chief Tegremond. The following day, the remaining 2000–4000 Caribs were forced into the area of Bloody Point and Bloody River, where over 2000 were massacred, though 100 settlers were also killed. One Frenchman went mad after being struck by a manchineel-poisoned arrow. The remaining Caribs fled, but by 1640, those not already enslaved, were removed to Dominica.[43][44]

Extermination of the Pequot, 1636–38[edit]

The Pequot War was an armed conflict that took place between 1636 and 1638 in New England between the Pequot tribe and an alliance of the colonists of the Massachusetts Bay, Plymouth, and Saybrook colonies and their allies from the Narragansett and Mohegan tribes. The war concluded with the decisive defeat of the Pequots. The Connecticut and Massachusetts colonies offered bounties for the heads of killed hostile Indians, and later for just their scalps, during the Pequot War in the 1630s;[45] Connecticut specifically reimbursed Mohegans for slaying the Pequot in 1637.[46] At the end, about 700 Pequots had been killed or taken into captivity.[47] Hundreds of prisoners were sold into slavery to the West Indies;[48] other survivors were dispersed as captives to the victorious tribes. The result was the elimination of the Pequot tribe as a viable polity in Southern New England, and the colonial authorities classified them as extinct. However, members of the Pequot tribe still live today as a federally recognized tribe, and they continue to contribute to their tribe's ongoing history.[49]

Massacre of the Narragansett people, 1675[edit]

The Great Swamp Massacre was committed during King Philip's War by colonial militia of New England on the Narragansett tribe in December 1675. On 15 December of that year, Narraganset warriors attacked the Jireh Bull Blockhouse and killed at least 15 people. Four days later, the colonial militia from Plymouth Colony, Connecticut Colony, and Massachusetts Bay Colony were led to the main Narragansett town in South Kingstown, Rhode Island. The settlement was burned, its inhabitants (including women and children) killed or evicted, and most of the tribe's winter stores destroyed. It is believed that at least 97 Narragansett warriors and 300 to 1,000 non-combatants were killed, though exact figures are unknown.[50] The massacre was a critical blow to the Narragansett tribe from which they never fully recovered.[51]

French and Indian Wars, 1754–63[edit]

During the French and Indian War, Lord Jeffrey Amherst, commanding officer of British forces in North America, authorized the use biological warfare to exterminate a local tribe of Ottawa Indians. As of 12 June 1755, Massachusetts governor William Shirley was offering a bounty of £40 for a male Indian scalp, and £20 for scalps of females or of children under 12 years old.[52][53] In 1756, Pennsylvania Lieutenant Governor Robert Morris, in his Declaration of War against the Lenni Lenape (Delaware) people, offered "130 Pieces of Eight, for the Scalp of Every Male Indian Enemy, above the Age of Twelve Years," and "50 Pieces of Eight for the Scalp of Every Indian Woman, produced as evidence of their being killed."[52][54]


Officially, the last of the Beothuks, Shanawdithit (ca. 1801 – 6 June 1829)
Suzannah Anstey (née Manuel. 1832–1911). Daughter of Beothuk woman called 'Elizabeth' & husband Samuel Anstey (1832–1923). Twillingate

On 13 April 1709, New France intendant Jacques Raudot passed the Ordinance Rendered on the Subject of the Negroes and the Savages Called Panis, legalizing the purchase and possession of indigenous slaves in New France. When Raudot pronounced indigenous slavery to be legal in New France, the practice had already been well established in the Native and French alliances throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. After the 1709 Ordinance came into effect, slavery in the colony grew exponentially. Natives flooded the slave market in the course of intense diplomacy with the French to prevent colonial encroachment of Native land.[55] Therefore, the flood of Native slaves in the St. Lawrence largely came from their Western counterparts. According to Rushforth, “by narrowing the target to a specific set of victims known as the ‘Panis nation,’ Raudot and his successors created a North American counterpart to the African kingdom of Nigritie: a distant and populous nation at war with more proximate allies, poorly understood but clearly identified as legally and morally enslavable".[56] Effectively, this meant Western Natives were strengthening future adversaries in the east, with their own slaves, in a struggle to preserve their land.

Although not without conflict, French Canadians' early interactions with Canada's indigenous populations were relatively peaceful in comparison to the expansionist and aggressive policies of British North America.[57] First Nations and Métis peoples played a critical part in the development of French colonies in Canada, particularly for their role in assisting French coureur des bois and voyageurs in the exploration of the continent during the North American fur trade.[58] Nevertheless, by 1829, with the death of Shanawdithit, the Beothuk people, the indigenous people of Newfoundland were officially declared extinct after suffering epidemics, starvation, loss of access to food sources, and displacement by English and French fishermen and traders.[59] Scholars disagree in their definition of genocide in relation to the Beothuk, and the parties have differing political agendas.[60] While some scholars believe that the Beothuk died out due to the elements noted above, another theory is that Europeans conducted a sustained campaign of genocide against them.[61]

More recent understandings of the concept of "cultural genocide" and its relation to settler colonialism have led modern scholars to a renewed discussion of the genocidal aspects of the Canadian states' role in producing and legitimating the process of physical and cultural destruction of Indigenous people.[62] In the 1990s some scholars began pushing for Canada to recognize the Canadian Indian residential school system as a genocidal process rooted in colonialism.[63] This public debate led to the formation of the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission which was formed in 2008.[64][65]

The residential school system was established following the passage of the Indian Act in 1876. The system was designed to remove children from the influence of their families and culture with the aim of assimilating them into the dominant Canadian culture.[66] The final school closed in 1996.[67] Over the course of the system's existence, about 30% of native children, or roughly 150,000, were placed in residential schools nationally; at least 6,000 of these students died while in attendance.[68][69] The system has been described as cultural genocide: "killing the Indian in the child."[70][71][72] Part of this process during the 1960s through the 1980s, dubbed the Sixties Scoop, was investigated and the child seizures deemed genocidal by Judge Edwin Kimelman, who wrote: "You took a child from his or her specific culture and you placed him into a foreign culture without any [counselling] assistance to the family which had the child. There is something dramatically and basically wrong with that."[73] another aspect of the residential school systems was its use of forced sterilization of Indigenous women who chose not to follow the schools advice of marrying non-Indigenous men. Indigenous women made up only 2.5% of the Canadian population, but 25% of those who were sterilized under the Canadian eugenics laws (such as the Sexual Sterilization Act of Alberta) – many without their knowledge or consent.[74]

The Executive Summary of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission found that the state pursued a policy of cultural genocide through forced assimilation.[75] The ambiguity of the phrasing allowed for the interpretation that physical and biological genocide also occurred. The Commission, however, was not authorized to conclude that physical and biological genocide occurred, as such a finding would imply a difficult to prove legal responsibility for the Canadian government. As a result, the debate about whether the Canadian government also committed physical and biological genocide against Indigenous populations remains open.[64][65]


Graph of population decline in central Mexico caused by successive epidemics


The Mexican government's response to the various uprisings of the Yaqui tribe have been likened to genocide particularly under Porfirio Diaz.[76] Due to slavery and massacre, the population of the Yaqui tribe in Mexico was reduced from 30,000 to 7,000 under Diaz's rule. One source estimates at least 20,000 out of these Yaquis were victims of state murders in Sonora.[77][78] Mexican president Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador said he'd be willing to offer apologies for the abuses in 2019.[79]

The Southern Cone[edit]

Both Argentina and Chile launched campaigns of territorial expansion in the second half of the 19th century, at the expenses of indigenous peoples and neighbor states. The so-called Pacification of the Araucania by the Chilean army dispossessed the up-to-then independent Mapuche people between the 1860s and the 1880s, as did Argentina with the Conquest of the Desert.[80] In southern Patagonia, both states occupied indigenous land and ocean, and facilitated the genocide implemented by sheep-farmers and the businessmen in Tierra del Fuego.[81] Argentina also expanded northward, dispossessing a number of Chaco peoples through a policy that may be considered as genocidal.[82]

United States colonization of indigenous territories[edit]

Stacie Martin states that the United States has not been legally admonished by the international community for genocidal acts against its indigenous population, but many historians and academics describe events such as the Mystic massacre, The Trail of Tears, the Sand Creek Massacre and the Mendocino War as genocidal in nature.[83] Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz states that US history, as well as inherited Indigenous trauma, cannot be understood without dealing with the genocide that the United States committed against Indigenous peoples. From the colonial period through the founding of the United States and continuing in the twentieth century, this has entailed torture, terror, sexual abuse, massacres, systematic military occupations, removals of Indigenous peoples from their ancestral territories, forced removal of Native American children to military-like boarding schools, allotment, and a policy of termination.[84] The letters of British commander Jeffery Amherst indicated genocidal intent when he authorized the deliberate use of disease-infected blankets as a biological weapon against indigenous populations during the 1763 Pontiac's Rebellion, saying, "You will Do well to try to Inoculate the Indians by means of Blanketts, as well as to try Every other method that can serve to Extirpate this Execreble Race", and instructing his subordinates, "I need only Add, I Wish to Hear of no prisoners should any of the villains be met with arms."[13][85][86] When smallpox swept the northern plains of the U.S. in 1837, the U.S. Secretary of War Lewis Cass ordered that no Mandan (along with the Arikara, the Cree, and the Blackfeet) be given smallpox vaccinations, which were provided to other tribes in other areas.[87][88][89]

Indian Removal and the Trail of Tears[edit]

Following the Indian Removal Act of 1830 the American government began forcibly relocating East Coast tribes across the Mississippi. The removal included many members of the Cherokee, Muscogee (Creek), Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw nations, among others in the United States, from their homelands to Indian Territory in eastern sections of the present-day state of Oklahoma. About 2,500–6,000 died along the Trail of Tears.[90] Chalk and Jonassohn assert that the deportation of the Cherokee tribe along the Trail of Tears would almost certainly be considered an act of genocide today.[91] The Indian Removal Act of 1830 led to the exodus. About 17,000 Cherokees, along with approximately 2,000 Cherokee-owned black slaves, were removed from their homes.[92] The number of people who died as a result of the Trail of Tears has been variously estimated. American doctor and missionary Elizur Butler, who made the journey with one party, estimated 4,000 deaths.[93]

Historians such as David Stannard[94] and Barbara Mann[95] have noted that the army deliberately routed the march of the Cherokee to pass through areas of a known cholera epidemic, such as Vicksburg. Stannard estimates that during the forced removal from their homelands, following the Indian Removal Act signed into law by President Andrew Jackson in 1830, 8,000 Cherokee died, about half the total population.[94]

American Indian Wars[edit]

A mass grave being dug for frozen bodies from the 1890 Wounded Knee Massacre, in which the U.S. Army killed 150 Lakota people, marking the end of the American Indian Wars

During the American Indian Wars, the American Army carried out a number of massacres and forced relocations of Indigenous peoples that are sometimes considered genocide.[citation needed] The 1864 Sand Creek Massacre, which caused outrage in its own time, has been called genocide. Colonel John Chivington led a 700-man force of Colorado Territory militia in a massacre of 70–163 peaceful Cheyenne and Arapaho, about two-thirds of whom were women, children, and infants. Chivington and his men took scalps and other body parts as trophies, including human fetuses and male and female genitalia.[96] In defense of his actions Chivington stated,

Damn any man who sympathizes with Indians! ... I have come to kill Indians, and believe it is right and honorable to use any means under God's heaven to kill Indians. ... Kill and scalp all, big and little; nits make lice.

— - Col. John Milton Chivington, U.S. Army[97]

U.S. acquisition of California[edit]

The U.S. colonization of California started in earnest in 1845, with the Mexican–American War. With the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, signed in 1848, giving the United States authority over 525,000 square miles of new territory. In addition to Gold Rush slaughter, there was also a large number of state-subsidized massacres by colonists against Native Americans in the territory, causing several entire ethnic groups to be wiped out. In one such series of conflicts, the so-called Mendocino War and the subsequent Round Valley War, the entirety of the Yuki people was brought to the brink of extinction, from a previous population of some 3,500 people to fewer than 100. According to Russell Thornton, estimates of the pre-Columbian population of California may have been as high as 300,000. By 1849, due to a number of epidemics, the number had decreased to 150,000. But from 1849 and up until 1890 the Indigenous population of California had fallen below 20,000, primarily because of the killings.[98] At least 4,500 California Indians were killed between 1849 and 1870, while many more perished due to disease and starvation.[99] 10,000 Indians were also kidnapped and sold as slaves.[100] In a speech before representatives of Native American peoples in June 2019, California governor Gavin Newsom apologized for the genocide. Newsom said, "That’s what it was, a genocide. No other way to describe it. And that’s the way it needs to be described in the history books."[101]

One California law made it legal to declare any jobless Indian a vagrant, then auction his services off for up to four months. And it permitted whites to force Indian children to work for them until they were eighteen, provided that they obtained permission from what the law referred to as a 'friend' was obtained first. Whites hunted down adult Indians in the mountains, kidnapped their children, and sold them as apprentices for as little as $50. Indians could not complain in court because by another California statute 'no Indian or Black or Mulatto person was permitted to give evidence in favor of or against a white person'. One contemporary wrote "The minor are sometimes guilty of the most brutal acts with the Indians... such incidents have fallen under my notice that would make humanity weep and men disown their race".[102] The towns of Marysville and Honey Lake paid bounties for Indian scalps. Shasta City offered $5 for every Indian head brought to City Hall; California's State Treasury reimbursed many of the local governments for their expenses.

Politics of modern Brazil[edit]

Over 80 indigenous tribes disappeared between 1900 and 1957, and of a population of over one million during this period 80% had been killed through deculturalization,[how?] disease, or murder.[103] It has also been argued that genocide has occurred during the modern era with the ongoing destruction of the Jivaro, Yanomami and other tribes.[104][105]

Indigenous peoples of Africa and Asia (pre-1948)[edit]

French colonization of Africa[edit]


Over the course and immediately after the French conquest of Algeria there where a series of demographic catastrophes in Algeria between 1830 through 1871 due to a variety of factors. The demographic crisis was such that, Dr. René Ricoux, head of demographic and medical statistics at the statistical office of the General Government of Algeria, foresaw the simple disappearance of Algerian "natives as a whole."[106][better source needed] Algerian demographic change can be divided into three phases: an almost constant decline during the conquest period, up until its heaviest drop from an estimated 2.7 million in 1861 to 2.1 million in 1871, and finally moving into a gradual increase[107] to a level of three million inhabitants by 1890. Causes range from a series of famines, diseases, emigration;[108] to the violent methods used by the French army during their Pacification of Algeria which historians argue to constitute acts of genocide.[109]

Congo Free State[edit]

Under Leopold II of Belgium the population loss in the Congo Free State is estimated at sixty percent.[110] Congo Free State was especially hard hit by sleeping sickness and smallpox epidemics.[111]

Genocide in German South West Africa[edit]

Herero survivors after an escape through the arid Kalahari desert

Atrocities against the indigenous African population by the German colonial empire can be dated to the earliest German settlements on the continent. The German colonial authorities carried out genocide in German South-West Africa (GSWA) and the survivors were incarcerated in concentration camps. It was also reported that, between 1885 and 1918, the indigenous population of Togo, German East Africa (GEA) and the Cameroons suffered from various human rights abuses including starvation from scorched earth tactics and forced relocation for use as labour. The German Empire's action in GSWA against the Herero tribe is considered by Howard Ball to be the first genocide of the 20th century.[112] After the Herero, Namaqua and Damara began an uprising against the colonial government,[113] General Lothar von Trotha, appointed as head of the German forces in GSWA by Emperor Wilhelm II in 1904, gave the order for the German forces to push them into the desert where they would die.[114] In 2004, the German state apologised for the genocide.[115] While many argue that the military campaign in Tanzania to suppress the Maji Maji Rebellion in GEA between 1905 and 1907 was not an act of genocide, as the military did not have as an intentional goal the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Africans, according to Dominik J. Schaller, the statement [Note 2] released at the time by Governor Gustav Adolf von Götzen did not exculpate him from the charge of genocide, but was proof that the German administration knew that their scorched earth methods would result in famine.[116] It is estimated that 200,000 Africans died from famine with some areas completely and permanently devoid of human life.[117][118][119]

Tsardom of Russia's conquest of Siberia[edit]

Cossacks collecting yasak in Siberia

The Russian conquest of Siberia was accompanied by massacres due to indigenous resistance to colonization by the Russian Cossacks, who savagely crushed the natives. At the hands of people like Vasilii Poyarkov in 1645 and Yerofei Khabarov in 1650 some peoples like the Daur were slaughtered by the Russians to the extent that it is considered genocide. 8,000 out of a previously 20,000 strong population in Kamchatka remained after being subjected to half a century of Cossacks slaughter.[120]

In the 1640s the Yakuts were subjected to massacres during the Russian advance into their land near the Lena River, and on Kamchatka in the 1690s the Koryak, Kamchadals, and Chukchi were also subjected to massacres by the Russians.[121] When the Russians did not obtain the demanded amount of yasak from the natives, the Governor of Yakutsk, Piotr Golovin, who was a Cossack, used meat hooks to hang the native men. In the Lena basin, 70% of the Yakut population died within 40 years, and rape and enslavement were used against native women and children in order to force the natives to pay the Yasak.[122]

In Kamchatka the Russians savagely crushed the Itelmens uprisings against their rule in 1706, 1731, and 1741, the first time the Itelmen were armed with stone weapons and were badly unprepared and equipped but they used gunpowder weapons the second time. The Russians faced tougher resistance when from 1745–56 they tried to exterminate the gun and bow equipped Koraks until their victory. The Russian Cossacks also faced fierce resistance and were forced to give up when trying unsuccessfully to wipe out the Chukchi through genocide in 1729, 1730–1, and 1744-7.[123] After the Russian defeat in 1729 at Chukchi hands, the Russian commander Major Pavlutskiy was responsible for the Russian war against the Chukchi and the mass slaughters and enslavement of Chukchi women and children in 1730–31, but his cruelty only made the Chukchis fight more fiercely.[124] A genocide of the Chukchis and Koraks was ordered by Empress Elizabeth in 1742 to totally expel them from their native lands and erase their culture through war. The command was that the natives be "totally extirpated" with Pavlutskiy leading again in this war from 1744–47 in which he led to the Cossacks "with the help of Almighty God and to the good fortune of Her Imperial Highness", to slaughter the Chukchi men and enslave their women and children as booty. However the Chukchi ended this campaign and forced them to give up by killing Pavlitskiy and decapitating his head.[125] The Russians were also launching wars and slaughters against the Koraks in 1744 and 1753-4. After the Russians tried to force the natives to convert to Christianity, the different native peoples like the Koraks, Chukchis, Itelmens, and Yukagirs all united to drive the Russians out of their land in the 1740s, culminating in the assault on Nizhnekamchatsk fort in 1746.[126] Kamchatka today is European in demographics and culture with only 2.5% of it being native, around 10,000 from a previous number of 150,000, due to the mass slaughters by the Cossacks after its annexation in 1697 of the Itelmen and Koryaks throughout the first decades of Russian rule.[127] The genocide by the Russian Cossacks devastated the native peoples of Kamchatka and exterminated much of their population.[128][129] In addition to committing genocide they Cossacks also devastated the wildlife by slaughtering massive numbers of animals for fur.[130] 90% of the Kamchadals and half of the Vogules were killed from the eighteenth to nineteenth centuries and the rapid genocide of the indigenous population led to entire ethnic groups being entirely wiped out, with around 12 exterminated groups which could be named by Nikolai Iadrintsev as of 1882. Much of the slaughter was brought on by the fur trade.[131]

The Aleuts in the Aleutians were subjected to genocide and slavery by the Russians for the first 20 years of Russian rule, with the Aleut women and children captured by the Russians and Aleut men slaughtered.[132]

The Russian colonization of Siberia and treatment of the resident indigenous peoples has been compared to European colonization of the Americas, with similar negative impacts on the indigenous Siberians as upon the indigenous peoples of the Americas. One of these commonalities is the appropriation of indigenous peoples' land.[133]

Japanese Empire[edit]

Colonization of Hokkaido[edit]

The Ainu are an indigenous people in Japan (Hokkaidō).[134] In a 2009 news story, Japan Today reported, "Many Ainu were forced to work, essentially as slaves, for Wajin (ethnic Japanese), resulting in the breakup of families and the introduction of smallpox, measles, cholera and tuberculosis into their community. In 1869, the new Meiji government renamed Ezo as Hokkaido and unilaterally incorporated it into Japan. It banned the Ainu language, took Ainu land away, and prohibited salmon fishing and deer hunting."[135] Roy Thomas wrote: "Ill treatment of native peoples is common to all colonial powers, and, at its worst, leads to genocide. Japan's native people, the Ainu, have, however, been the object of a particularly cruel hoax, as the Japanese have refused to accept them officially as a separate minority people."[136] The Ainu have emphasized that they were the natives of the Kuril islands and that the Japanese and Russians were both invaders.[137] In 2004, the small Ainu community living in Russia in Kamchatka Krai wrote a letter to Vladimir Putin, urging him to reconsider any move to award the Southern Kuril islands to Japan. In the letter they blamed the Japanese, the Tsarist Russians and the Soviets for crimes against the Ainu such as killings and assimilation, and also urged him to recognize the Japanese genocide against the Ainu people, which was turned down by Putin.[138]

Colonization of Okinawa[edit]

Okinawans are an indigenous people to the islands to the west of Japan, originally known as the Ryukyu islands.[139] With skeletons dating back 32,000 years, the Okinawan or Ryukyu people, have a long history on the islands that includes a kingdom of its own known as the Ryukyu Kingdom.[140]  The kingdom established trade relationships with China and Japan that began in the late 1500s and lasted until the 1860s.[141] In the 1590s Japan made its first attempt at subjecting the Ryukyu Kingdom by sending a group of 3,000 samurai armed with muskets to conquer the Ryukyu kingdom.[139] Indefinite take over was not achieved, however the Ryukyu Kingdom became an acting colony of Japan, and as a result paid homage to the Japanese while feigning their own independence to China to maintain trade.[139] In 1879 after a small rebellion by the Ryukyu people was squelched the Japanese government (The Ryukyu people had requested help from China to break all bonds from Japan) The Japanese punished Ryukyu by officially naming it a state of Japan and re branding the kingdom as Okinawa.[141] Much like the Ainu people, the people of the Ryukyu Islands were punished for speaking their own language, forced to identify with Japanese myths and legends (forgoing their own legends), renamed (Okinawa), forced to change their first and last names to Japanese names, and forced reorient their religion around the Japanese Emperor.[139] Japan had officially expanded their colonization to the Okinawan islands, where the Okinawans didn't play a significant role in Japan's history until the end of World War II.[141]

America brought the war to Japan, the first area that was effected were the Okinawan Islands.[142] The Okinawan citizens forced into becoming soldiers were told that Americans would take no prisoners. In addition to the warnings Okinawans were given a grenade per household, the use of the grenade was reserved in case Americans gained control of the island, with the standing orders to have a member of the household gather everyone and pull the pin for mass suicide.[142] Okinawans were told this was to avoid the "inevitable" torture that would follow any occupation.[142]  In addition the Japanese army kicked any natives out of their homes that weren't currently serving in the army (women and children included) and forced them into open, unprotected, spaces such as beaches and caves. These happened to be the first place the Americans arrived on the island. As a result, more than 120,000 Okinawans (between a quarter and a third of the population) died, soldiers and civilians alike.[139][142] The Americans took over the island and the war was soon over. Okinawa had again become a colony, this time to America. America launched their main base in Asia from Okinawa and the Emperor of Japan approved, giving Okinawa to America for an agreed 25–50 years to move the majority of Americans out of mainland Japan.[139] To that end, Americans have been in Okinawa for 74 years and show no signs of leaving.[139] In the occupation Okinawan natives were forced to give up their best cultivating land to the Americans occupying their island. They maintain them to this day.[139] 

Issues in Okinawa have yet to be resolved regarding the expired stay of American soldiers. Although Okinawa was given back to Japan, the American base still stays. The Japanese government has yet to take action, despite Okinawans raising the Issue.[139] However this isn't the only problem that the Japanese Government has refused to take action with. Okinawans were ruled an Indigenous people in 2008 by the committee of the United Nations (UN), in addition to their original languages being recognized as endangered or Severely endangered by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO); The UN has encouraged that Okinawan history, and language be mandatorily taught in schools in Okinawa. Nothing has yet to be done.[139] Okinawans are now in a cultural struggle that matches that of the Ainu people.[134] They are not allowed to be Japanese-Okinawan, the only term that is accepted nationally or legally is Japanese.[143] To Change their cultural crisis there are few apparent choices. The Okinawan people can commit a genocide of culture and forget their distinct differences and history to be accepted nationally, or accept their differences and become an outcast to the Japanese homologous society.[143]

Genocide of Oroqen and Hezhen[edit]

During the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945), the Japanese performed "bacterial experiments" on the Oroqen people and introduced them to opium which contributed to their deaths and caused their population to decline until only 1,000 of them remained alive at the end of the war.[144][145][146][147][148] The Japanese banned the Oroqen from communicating with members of other ethnicities, and they also forced them to hunt animals for them in exchange for starvation rations and unsuitable clothing which caused them to die from exposure to the inclement weather. The Japanese also forced Oroqen adults who were older than 18 to take opium. After 2 Japanese troops were killed in Alihe by an Oroqen hunter, the Japanese poisoned 40 Oroqen to death.[149] The Japanese forced the Oroqen to fight the war for them which led to a massive decrease in the Oroqen population.[150]

The Hezhen population declined by 90% due to deaths that resulted from acts of Japanese cruelty which included forced opium use, slave labor and relocation by the Japanese.[151][152][153][154] When the Japanese were defeated in 1945, only 300 Hezhen were left alive out of a total pre-war population that was estimated to number 1,200 in 1930.[155] It has been described as genocide.[156]

Vietnamese conquest of Champa[edit]

The Vietnamese conquered Champa and settled its territory with Vietnamese migrants during the march to the south after fighting repeated wars with Champa, shatterring Champa in the invasion of Champa in 1471 and finally completing the conquest in 1832 under Emperor Minh Mang.

Dzungar genocide[edit]

The massacre of Oroi-Jalatu, 1756. Manchu general Zhao Hui attacked the Dzungars at night.

Some scholars estimate that about 80% of the Dzungar (Western Mongol) population (600,000 or more) were destroyed by a combination of warfare and disease in the Dzungar genocide during the Qing conquest of Dzungar Khanate in 1755–1757, in which Manchu Bannermen and Khalkha Mongols exterminated the Dzungar Oirat Mongols.[157] Mark Levene, a historian whose recent research interests focus on genocide,[158] has stated that the extermination of the Dzungars was "arguably the eighteenth-century genocide par excellence."[159]

Anti-Zunghar Uyghur rebels from the Turfan and Hami oases had submitted to Qing rule as vassals and requested Qing help for overthrowing Zunghar rule. Uyghur leaders like Emin Khoja were granted titles within the Qing nobility, and these Uyghurs helped supply the Qing military forces during the anti-Zunghar campaign.[160][161][162] The Qing employed Khoja Emin in its campaign against the Dzungars and used him as an intermediary with Muslims from the Tarim Basin to inform them that the Qing were only aiming to kill Oirats (Zunghars) and that they would leave the Muslims alone, and also to convince them to kill the Oirats (Dzungars) themselves and side with the Qing since the Qing noted the Muslims' resentment of their former experience under Zunghar rule at the hands of Tsewang Araptan.[163]

British Empire (pre-1945)[edit]

Ireland's Holocaust mural in Belfast. British government policy during the time of The Great Famine in Ireland remains controversial.

In places like the United States, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada, settler colonialism was carried out by the British. Foreign land viewed as attractive for settlement was declared as terra nullius or "nobody's land". The indigenous inhabitants were therefore denied any sovereignty or property rights in the eyes of the British.[164] This justified invasion and the violent seizure of native land to create colonies populated by British settlers. Colonization like this usually caused a large decrease in the indigenous population from war, newly introduced diseases, massacre by colonists and attempts at forced assimilation. The settlers from Britain and Europe grew rapidly in number and created entirely new societies. The indigenous population became an oppressed minority in their own country. The gradual violent expansion of colonies into indigenous land could last for centuries, as it did in the Australian frontier wars and American Indian Wars.[165]

Widespread population decline occurred following conquest principally from introduction of infectious disease. The number of Australian Aborigines declined by 84% after British colonization.[166] The Maori population of New Zealand suffered a 57% drop from its highest point.[167] In Canada, the indigenous first nations population of British Columbia decreased by 75%.[168] Surviving indigenous groups continued to suffer from severe racially motivated discrimination from their new colonial societies.[169] Aboriginal children, the Stolen Generations, were confiscated by the Australian government and subject to forced assimilation and child abuse for most of the 20th century. Aborigines were only granted the right to vote in some states in 1962.[170]

Similarly, the Canadian government has apologized for its historical "attitudes of racial and cultural superiority" and "suppression" of the first nations, including its role in residential schools where first nation children were confined and abused.[171] Canada has been accused of genocide for its historical compulsory sterilization of indigenous peoples in Alberta during the fears of jobs being stolen by immigrants and living lives of poverty provoked by the great depression.[172]

It has proven a controversial question whether the drastic population decline can be considered an example of genocide, and scholars have argued whether the process as a whole or specific periods and local processes qualify under the legal definition. Raphael Lemkin, the originator of the term "genocide", considered the colonial replacement of Native Americans by English and later British colonists to be one of the historical examples of genocide.[173] Historian Niall Ferguson has referred to the case in Tasmania as "an event that truly merits the now overused term 'genocide'",[174] and mentions Ireland and North America as areas that suffered ethnic cleansing at the hands of the British.[175] According to Patrick Wolfe in the Journal of Genocide Research, the "frontier massacring of indigenous peoples" by the British constitutes a genocide.[176]

Colonization of Australia and Tasmania[edit]

The so-called extinction of the Aboriginal Tasmanians is regarded as a classic case of near genocide by Lemkin, most comparative scholars of genocide, and many general historians, including Robert Hughes, Ward Churchill, Leo Kuper and Jared Diamond, who base their analysis on previously published histories.[177] Between 1824 and 1908 White settlers and Native Mounted Police in Queensland, according to Raymond Evans, killed more than 10,000 Aboriginal people, who were regarded as vermin and sometimes even hunted for sport.[178]

Of an estimated population in 1788 of over half a million, fewer than 50,000 Aboriginal people survived by 1900. Most perished from introduced diseases, but possibly 20,000 people were killed by British troops, police, and settlers in the Australian frontier wars and massacres accompanying their dispossession.[179] Ben Kiernan, an Australian historian of genocide, treats the Australian evidence over the first century of colonization as an example of genocide in his 2007 history of the concept and practice, Blood and soil: a world history of genocide and extermination from Sparta to Darfur.[180] The Australian practice of removing the children of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander descent from their families, has been described as genocidal.[181][182] The 1997 report Bringing Them Home, which examined the fate of the "stolen generations" concluded that the forced separation of Aboriginal children from their family constituted an act of genocide.[183] In the 1990s a number of Australian state institutions, including the state of Queensland, apologized for its policies regarding forcible separation of Aboriginal children.[184] Another allegation against the Australian state is the use of medical services to Aboriginal people to administer contraceptive therapy to Aboriginal women without their knowledge or consent, including the use of Depo Provera, as well as tubal ligations. Both forced adoption and forced contraception would fall under the provisions of the UN genocide convention.[185] Some Australian scholars, including historians Geoffrey Blainey and Keith Windschuttle and political scientist Ken Minogue, reject the view that Australian Aboriginal policy was genocidal.[186]

Famines in British India[edit]

Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World is a book by Mike Davis about the connection between political economy and global climate patterns, particularly El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). By comparing ENSO episodes in different time periods and across countries, Davis explores the impact of colonialism and the introduction of capitalism, and the relation with famine in particular. Davis argues that "Millions died, not outside the 'modern world system', but in the very process of being forcibly incorporated into its economic and political structures. They died in the golden age of Liberal Capitalism; indeed, many were murdered ... by the theological application of the sacred principles of Smith, Bentham and Mill."[187]

Davis characterizes the Indian famines under the British Raj as "colonial genocide." Some scholars, including Niall Ferguson, have disputed this judgment, while others, including Adam Jones, have affirmed it.[188][189]

Rubber Boom in Congo and Putumayo[edit]

Amazonian Indians enslaved during the rubber boom in the Putumayo region of Peru

From 1879 to 1912, the world experienced a rubber boom. Rubber prices skyrocketed, and it became increasingly profitable to extract rubber from rainforest zones in South America and Central Africa. Rubber extraction was labor-intensive, and the need for a large workforce had a significant negative effect on the indigenous population across Brazil, Peru, Ecuador and Colombia and in the Congo. The owners of the plantations or rubber barons were rich, but those who collected the rubber made very little, as a large amount of rubber was needed to be profitable. Rubber barons rounded up all the Indians and forced them to tap rubber out of the trees. Slavery and gross human rights abuses were widespread, and in some areas, 90% of the Indian population was wiped out. One plantation started with 50,000 Indians and when the killings were discovered, only 8,000 were still alive. These rubber plantations were part of the Brazilian rubber market which declined as rubber plantations in Southeast Asia became more effective.[190]

Roger Casement, an Irishman travelling the Putumayo region of Peru as a British consul during 1910–1911, documented the abuse, slavery, murder, and use of stocks for torture against the native Indians: [191]

"The crimes charged against many men now in the employ of the Peruvian Amazon Company are of the most atrocious kind, including murder, violation, and constant flogging."

Contemporary examples[edit]

The genocide of indigenous tribes is still an ongoing feature in the modern world, with the ongoing depopulation of the Jivaro, Yanomami and other tribes in Brazil having been described as genocide.[105] The states actions in Bangladesh, against the Jumma have been described internationally as ethnic cleansing and genocide.[192][193][194] Paraguay has also been accused of carrying out a genocide against the Aché whose case was brought before the Inter-American Human Rights Commission. The commission gave a provisional ruling that genocide had not been committed by the state, but did express concern over "possible abuses by private persons in remote areas of the territory of Paraguay."[195]


In Bangladesh, the persecution of the indigenous tribes of the Chittagong Hill Tracts such as the Chakma, Marma, Tripura, Jumma people and others who are mainly Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, and Animists, has been described as genocidal, with Chackmas reportedly the worst affected.[196][197][198][199][200] The Chittagong Hill Tracts are located bordering India, Myanmar and the Bay of Bengal, and is the home to 500,000 indigenous people. The perpetrators were the Bangladeshi military and the Bengali people of the Chittagong division, who together have burned down Chackma homes, killed many Chakmas, and there were some reports of rape of the indigenous women. There are also accusations of Chakmas being forced to convert to Islam. The conflict started soon after Bangladeshi independence, in 1972 when the Constitution imposed Bengali as the sole official language of the country. Subsequently, the government encouraged and sponsored massive settlement by Bangladeshis in the region, which changed the demographics from 98 percent indigenous in 1972 to fifty percent by 1997. The government allocated a full third of the Bangladeshi military to the region to support Bengali settlers, sparking a protracted guerrilla war between Hill tribes and the military.[197] During this conflict, which officially ended in 1997, a large number of human rights violations against the indigenous peoples have been reported.[201] Amnesty International estimates that up to 90,000 indigenous families were displaced.[202] Following the Chittagong Hill Tracts Peace Accord in 1997, though no further violence have been reported, promised land reforms have only at best been partially fulfilled despite repeated promises by the Bangladeshi government reported Amnesty International in 2013.[202] Chakmas also live in India's Tripura state where a Tripuri separatist movement is going on.[203]


Indigenous protesters from Vale do Javari in Belém

From the late 1950s until 1968, the state of Brazil submitted their indigenous peoples of Brazil to violent attempts to integrate, pacify and acculturate their communities. In 1967 public prosecutor Jader de Figueiredo Correia, submitted the Figueiredo Report to the dictatorship which was then ruling the country, the report which ran to seven thousand pages was not released until 2013. The report documents genocidal crimes against the indigenous peoples of Brazil, including mass murder, torture and bacteriological and chemical warfare, reported slavery, and sexual abuse. The rediscovered documents are being examined by the National Truth Commission who have been tasked with the investigations of human rights violations which occurred in the periods 1947 through to 1988. The report reveals that the IPS had enslaved indigenous people, tortured children and stolen land. The Truth Commission is of the opinion that entire tribes in Maranhão were completely eradicated and in Mato Grosso, an attack on thirty Cinturão Largo left only two survivors. The report also states that landowners and members of the IPS had entered isolated villages and deliberately introduced smallpox. Of the one hundred and thirty-four people accused in the report the state has as yet not tried a single one,[204] since the Amnesty Law passed in the end of the dictatorship does not allow trials for the abuses which happened in such period. The report also detailed instances of mass killings, rapes, and torture, Figueiredo stated that the actions of the IPS had left the indigenous peoples near extinction. The state abolished the IPS following the release of the report. The Red Cross launched an investigation after further allegations of ethnic cleansing were made after the IPS had been replaced. [205][206]


In the protracted conflict in Colombia, indigenous groups such as the Awá, Wayuu, Pijao and Paez people have become subjected to intense violence by right-wing paramilitaries, leftist guerrillas, and the Colombian army.[207][208] Drug cartels, international resource extraction companies and the military have also used violence to force the indigenous groups out of their territories.[209][210][211] The National Indigenous Organization of Colombia argues that the violence is genocidal in nature, but others question whether there is a "genocidal intent" as required in international law.[212][213]

Congo (DRC)[edit]

In the Democratic Republic of Congo genocidal violence against the indigenous Mbuti, Lese and Ituri peoples has been endemic for decades. During the Congo Civil War (1998–2003), Pygmies were hunted down and eaten by both sides in the conflict, who regarded them as subhuman.[214] Sinafasi Makelo, a representative of Mbuti pygmies, has asked the UN Security Council to recognize cannibalism as a crime against humanity and also as an act of genocide.[215] According to a report by Minority Rights Group International there is evidence of mass killings, cannibalism and rape. The report, which labeled these events as a campaign of extermination, linked much of the violence to beliefs about special powers held by the Bambuti.[216] In Ituri district, rebel forces ran an operation code-named "Effacer le Tableau" (to wipe the slate clean). The aim of the operation, according to witnesses, was to rid the forest of pygmies.[217][218][219]

East Timor[edit]

Indonesia invaded East Timor or Timor-Leste, which had previously been a Portuguese colony, in 1975. Following this, the Indonesian government encouraged repressive military policies to deal with ethnic protests and armed resistance in the area and encouraged settlement to the region by people from other parts of Indonesia. The violence between 1975 and 1993 had claimed between 120,000 and 200,000 people. The repression entered the international spotlight in 1991 when a protest in Dili was disrupted by Indonesian forces who killed over 250 people and disappeared hundreds of others. The Santa Cruz massacre, as the event became known, drew significant international attention to the issue (highlighted with the 1996 Nobel Peace Prize being provided to Catholic Bishop Carlos Belo and resistance leader José Ramos-Horta). Following the international outcry, the Indonesian government began organizing a host of paramilitary groups in East Timor which continued harassing and killing pro-independence activists. At the same time, the Indonesian government significantly increased efforts at population resettlement to the area and destruction of infrastructure and the environment used by East Timorese communities. This eventually resulted in an international intervention force to be deployed for a vote by the population for independence of East Timor in 1999. The vote was significant in favor of independence and the Indonesian forces withdrew, although paramilitaries continued carrying out reprisal attacks for a few years.[220][221] A UN Report on the Indonesian occupation identified starvation, defoliant and napalm use, torture, rape, sexual slavery, disappearances, public executions, and extrajudicial killings as sanctioned by the Indonesian government and the entire colflict resulting in reducing the population to a third of its 1975 level.[222]


During the Guatemalan Civil War (1960–1996), the state forces carried out violent atrocities against the Maya. The government considered the Maya to be aligned with the communist insurgents, which they sometimes were but often were not. Guatemalan armed forces carried out three campaigns that have been described as genocidal. The first was a scorched earth policy which was also accompanied by mass killing, including the forced conscription of Mayan boys into the military where they were sometimes forced to participate in massacres against their own home villages. The second was to hunt down and exterminate those who had survived and evaded the army and the third was the forced relocation of survivors to "reeducation centers" and the continued pursuit of those who had fled into the mountains.[223] The armed forces used genocidal rape of women and children as a deliberate tactic. Children were bludgeoned to death by beating them against walls or thrown alive into mass graves where they would be crushed by the weight of the adult dead thrown atop them.[224] An estimated 200,000 people, most of them Maya, disappeared during the Guatemalan Civil War.[219] After the 1996 peace accords, a legal process was begun to determine the legal responsibility of the atrocities, and to locate and identify the disappeared. In 2013 former president Efraín Ríos Montt was convicted of genocide and crimes against humanity, and was sentenced to 80 years imprisonment.[225] Ten days later, the Constitutional Court of Guatemala overturned the conviction.[226][227]

Irian Jaya/West Papua[edit]

From the time of its independence until the late 1960s, the Indonesian government sought control of the Western half of the island of New Guinea, the area called Irian Jaya or West Papua, which had remained under the control of the Netherlands.[228] When it finally achieved internationally recognized control of the area, a number of clashes occurred between the Indonesian government and the Free Papua Movement. The government of Indonesia began a series of measures aimed to suppress the organization in the 1970s and the suppression reached high levels in the mid-1980s.[229] The resulting human rights abuses included extrajudicial killings, torture, disappearances, rape, and harassment of indigenous people throughout the province.[230] A 2004 report by the Allard K. Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic at Yale Law School identified both the mass violence and the transmigration policies which encouraged Balinese and Javanese families to relocate to the area as strong evidence "that the Indonesian government has committed proscribed acts with the intent to destroy the West Papuans as such, in violation of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide."[231] Genocide against indigenous people in the region were key claims made in the U.S. case of Beanal v. Freeport, one of the first lawsuits where indigenous people outside the U.S. petitioned to get a ruling against a multinational corporation for environmental destruction outside of the U.S. While the petitioner, an indigenous leader, claimed that the mining company Freeport-McMoRan had committed genocide through environmental destruction which "resulted in the purposeful, deliberate, contrived and planned demise of a culture of indigenous people," the court found that genocide pertains only to destruction of indigenous people and did not apply to the destruction of the culture of indigenous people; however, the court did leave open the opportunity for the petitioners to amend their filings with additional claim.[232]


people, mostly children, squatting on the ground
Displaced Rohingya people in Rakhine State

In Myanmar (Burma), the long-running civil war between the Military Junta and the insurgents has resulted in widespread atrocities against the indigenous Karen people some of whom are allied with the insurgents. These atrocities have been described as genocidal.[233] Burmese General Maung Hla stated that one day the Karen will only exist "in a museum"[234] The government has deployed 50 battalions in the Northern sector systematically attacking Karen villages with mortar and machine gun fire, and landmines. At least 446,000 Karen have been displaced from their homes by the military.[233][235] The Karen are also reported to have been subjected to forced labor, genocidal rape, child labor and the conscription of child soldiers.[236] The Rohingya people have also been subjected to persecution mass killings and forced displacement. The Myanmar army burned their villages and forced them to flee the country. Mass graves which contain the remains of many victims of genocide were discovered. By 2017 over 600,000 Rohingya people fled to Bangladesh, whose government was praised for giving shelter to them.[237][238]


There are 17 indigenous tribes which primarily live in the Chaco region of Paraguay. In 2002, their numbers were estimated to be 86,000. During the period between 1954 and 1989, when the military dictatorship of General Alfredo Stroessner ruled Paraguay, the indigenous population of the country suffered from more loss of territory and human rights abuses than at any other time in the nation's history. In early 1970, international groups claimed that the state was complicit in the genocide of the Aché, with charges ranging from kidnapping and the sale of children, withholding medicines and food, slavery and torture.[239] During the 1960s and 1970s, 85% of the Aché people were killed, often hacked to death with machetes, in order to make room for the timber industry, mining, farming and ranchers.[104] According to Jérémie Gilbert, the situation in Paraguay has proven that it is difficult to provide the proof required to show "specific intent", in support of a claim that genocide had occurred. The Aché, whose cultural group is now seen as extinct, fell victim to development by the state who had promoted the exploration of their territories by transnational companies for natural resources. Gilbert concludes that although a planned and voluntary destruction had occurred, it is argued by the state that there was no intent to destroy the Aché, as what had happened was due to development and was not a deliberate action.[240][241]


On 5 June 1959 Shri Purshottam Trikamdas, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India, presented a report on Tibet to the International Commission of Jurists (an NGO):

From the facts stated above the following conclusions may be drawn: ... (e) To examine all such evidence obtained by this Committee and from other sources and to take appropriate action thereon and in particular to determine whether the crime of Genocide – for which already there is strong presumption – is established and, in that case, to initiate such action as envisaged by the Genocide Convention of 1948 and by the Charter of the United Nations for suppression of these acts and appropriate redress;[242]

According to the Tibet Society of the UK, "In all, over one million Tibetans, a fifth of the population, had died as a result of the Chinese occupation right up until the end of the Cultural Revolution."[243]


  1. ^ The definition of indigenous peoples is controversial. This article uses a definition of indigenous peoples similar to that of international legislation by the United Nations (including UNESCO) and the World Trade Organization, as well as by the majority of relevant scholarship that applies to those ethnic minorities who were indigenous to a territory prior to being incorporated into a national state, and who are politically and culturally separate from the majority ethnic identity of the state that they are a part of. It does not dictate indigenous people as being simply the first known inhabitants of a territory.[citation needed]
  2. ^ "As in all wars against uncivilized nations the systematic damage to hostile people's goods and chattels was indispensable in this case. The destruction of economic values like the burning of villages and food supplies might seem barbaric. If one considers, however, on the one hand, in what short time African Negro huts are erected anew and the luxuriant growth of tropic nature gives rise to new field crops, and on the other hand the subjection of the enemy was only possible through a procedure like this, then one will consequently take a more favourable view of this dira necessitas."


  1. ^ a b Maybury-Lewis 2002, p. 45.
  2. ^ Jones 2010, p. 139.
  3. ^ Forge 2012, p. 77.
  4. ^ Moses 2004, p. 27.
  5. ^ Maybury-Lewis 2002, p. 48.
  6. ^ Hitchcock & Koperski 2008, pp. 577–82.
  7. ^ Mehta 2008, p. 19.
  8. ^ Attar 2010, p. 20.
  9. ^ Sautman 2003, pp. 174–240.
  10. ^ "President Carter on the AIRFA". Retrieved 1 August 2006.
  11. ^ Lemkin 2008, p. 79"By 'genocide' we mean the destruction of an ethnic group ... Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups."
  12. ^ Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2
  13. ^ a b Henderson, Donald A.; et al. (1999). "Smallpox as a Biological Weapon. Medical and Public Health Management". JAMA. 281 (22): 2127–2137. doi:10.1001/jama.281.22.2127. PMID 10367824.
  14. ^ Grenke 2005, p. 199"For the most part, however, the diseases that decimated the Natives were caused by natural contact. These greatly weakened Native peoples, leaving them less able to resist the Europeans. However, diseases themselves were rarely the source of the genocides or the deaths caused by genocidal means. These were caused by the aggressive actions of one group towards another."
  15. ^ Cave 2008, p. 273-74.
  16. ^ Barkan 2003.
  17. ^ Stannard 1993, p. xii.
  18. ^ Jones 2010, p. 67.
  19. ^ Smithers 2013, p. 3.
  20. ^ Stannard 1993.
  21. ^ Thornton 1987.
  22. ^ Stannard 1993, p. 281.
  23. ^ Thornton 1987, pp. 104–13.
  24. ^ Guenter Lewy (2007). "Were American Indians the Victims of Genocide?". History News Network. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
  25. ^ An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States; Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz; Beacon Press; 2014; Pgs. 41–42
  26. ^ Arthur C. Aufderheide, Conrado Rodríguez-Martín, Odin Langsjoen (1998). The Cambridge encyclopedia of human paleopathology. Cambridge University Press. p.205. ISBN 0-521-55203-6
  27. ^ McKenna, Erin, and Scott L. Pratt. 2015. American Philosophy: From Wounded Knee to the Present. Bloomsbury. p. 375.
  28. ^ Koch, Alexander; Brierley, Chris; Maslin, Mark M.; Lewis, Simon L. (2019). "Earth system impacts of the European arrival and Great Dying in the Americas after 1492". Quaternary Science Reviews. 207: 13–36. Bibcode:2019QSRv..207...13K. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.12.004.
  29. ^ Kent, Lauren (1 February 2019). "European colonizers killed so many Native Americans that it changed the global climate, researchers say". CNN. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
  30. ^ "La catastrophe démographique" (The Demographic Catastrophe) in L'Histoire n°322, July–August 2007, p. 17
  31. ^ Forsythe 2009, p. 297.
  32. ^ Juang 2008, p. 510.
  33. ^ Maybury-Lewis 2002, p. 44.
  34. ^ Noble David Cook (13 February 1998). Born to Die: Disease and New World Conquest, 1492–1650. Cambridge University Press. pp. 9–14. ISBN 978-0-521-62730-6.
  35. ^ Arthur C. Aufderheide, Conrado Rodríguez-Martín, Odin Langsjoen (1998). The Cambridge encyclopedia of human paleopathology. Cambridge University Press. p. 205. ISBN 0-521-55203-6
  36. ^ Trever, David. "The new book 'The Other Slavery' will make you rethink American history". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 20 June 2019.
  37. ^ Reséndez, Andrés (2016). The Other Slavery: The Uncovered Story of Indian Enslavement in America. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 17. ISBN 978-0547640983.
  38. ^ Minster, Christopher (10 September 2018). "Spain's American Colonies and the Encomienda System". ThoughtCo. Retrieved 16 February 2019.
  39. ^ Grenke 2005, p. 200.
  40. ^ Hickel, Jason (2018). The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and its Solutions. Windmill Books. p. 70. ISBN 978-1786090034.
  41. ^ Stannard 1993, p. 139.
  42. ^ Trafzer 1999, p. 1816.
  43. ^ Jean-Baptiste Du Tertre, Histoire Generale des Antilles..., 2 vols. Paris: Jolly, 1667, I:5–6
  44. ^ Hubbard, Vincent (2002). A History of St. Kitts. Macmillan Caribbean. pp. 17–18. ISBN 9780333747605.
  45. ^ Dunbar-Ortiz, Roxanne (2014). An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States. Beacon Press. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-8070-0040-3.
  46. ^ Tucker, Spencer C. (2011). The Encyclopedia of North American Indian Wars, 1607–1890. ABC-CLIO, LLC. p. 708. ISBN 978-1851096978.
  47. ^ John Winthrop, Journal of John Winthrop. ed. Dunn, Savage, Yeandle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996), 228.
  48. ^ Lion Gardiner, "Relation of the Pequot Warres", in History of the Pequot War: The Contemporary Accounts of Mason, Underhill, Vincent, and Gardiner (Cleveland, 1897), p. 138; Ethel Boissevain, "Whatever Became of the New England Indians Shipped to Bermuda to be Sold as Slaves," Man in the Northwest 11 (Spring 1981), pp. 103–114; Karen O. Kupperman, Providence Island, 1630–1641: The Other Puritan Colony (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), p. 172
  49. ^ Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation. "Tribal History". The Mashantucket (Western) Pequot Tribal Nation. Retrieved 23 August 2020.
  50. ^ Gott, Richard (2004). Cuba: A new history. Yale University Press. p. 32.
  51. ^ "Flintlock and Tomahawk—New England in King Philip's War" by Douglas Edward Leach, New York: MacMillan, 1958, pg. 130–132
  52. ^ a b "Scalping, Torture, and Mutilation by Indians". Blue Corn Comics. Archived from the original on 31 August 2016. Retrieved 28 July 2016.
  53. ^ Liz Sonneborn (14 May 2014). Chronology of American Indian History. p. 88. ISBN 9781438109848. Retrieved 28 July 2016.
  54. ^ "Declaration of War". 7 February 2014. Archived from the original on 7 February 2014.
  55. ^ Rushforth 179
  56. ^ Rushforth 165
  57. ^ Preston, David L. (2009). The Texture of Contact: European and Indian Settler Communities on the Frontiers of Iroquoia, 1667–1783. University of Nebraska Press. pp. 43–44. ISBN 978-0-8032-2549-7. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016.
  58. ^ J.R. Miller (2009). Compact, Contract, Covenant: Aboriginal Treaty-Making in Canada. University of Toronto Press. p. 34. ISBN 978-1-4426-9227-5. Archived from the original on 2 January 2014.
  59. ^ Newfoundland, Memorial University of. "Department of Religious Studies". Memorial University of Newfoundland. Retrieved 15 October 2019.
  60. ^ Rubinstein, WD (2004). "Genocide and Historical Debate: William D. Rubinstein Ascribes the Bitterness of Historians' Arguments to the Lack of an Agreed Definition and to Political Agendas". History Today. 54.
  61. ^ Knowles, RP; Tomplins J; Worthen WB (2003). Modern Drama: Defining the Field. University of Toronto Press. pp. 169. ISBN 978-0-8020-8621-1.
  62. ^ Woolford, Andrew; Thomas, Jasmine (2011). "Genocide of Canadian First Nations". In Samuel Totten; Robert Hitchcock (eds.). Genocide of Indigenous Peoples: A Critical Bibliographic Review. Transaction Publishers. pp. 61–87.
  63. ^ Annett, K. (2001). Hidden From History: The Untold Story of the Genocide of Aboriginal Peoples by the Church and State in Canada (PDF). The Truth Commission into the Genocide in Canada.
  64. ^ a b MacDonald, D. B. (2015). Canada's history wars: indigenous genocide and public memory in the United States, Australia, and Canada. Journal of Genocide Research, 17(4), 411–431.
  65. ^ a b Woolford, Andrew, and Jeff Benvenuto. "Canada and colonial genocide." Journal of Genocide Research 17, no. 4 (2015): 373–390.
  66. ^ "Canada's Residential Schools: The History, Part 1 Origins to 1939 – Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada Volume 1" (PDF). National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation. Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 2015. Retrieved 1 July 2016.
  67. ^ Rheault, D'Arcy (2011). "Solving the "Indian Problem": Assimilation Laws, Practices & Indian Residential Schools" (PDF). Ontario Métis Family Records Centre. Retrieved 29 June 2016.
  68. ^ "Residential School History: A Legacy of Shame" (PDF). Wabano Centre for Aboriginal Health. 2000. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 December 2015. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  69. ^ Tasker, John Paul (29 May 2015). "Residential schools findings point to 'cultural genocide,' commission chair says". CBC. Retrieved 1 July 2016.
  70. ^ "The Residential School System". Indigenous Foundations. UBC First Nations and Indigenous Studies. Archived from the original on 27 June 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  71. ^ Luxen, Micah (24 June 2016). "Survivors of Canada's 'cultural genocide' still healing". BBC. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  72. ^ "First Steps With First Nations" (PDF). Brethren in Christ Canada. April 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  73. ^ Genocide; Szumski, Bonnie; Greenhaven Press; 2001; Pgs. 155-8
  74. ^ Pegoraro, L. (2015). Second-rate victims: the forced sterilization of Indigenous peoples in the USA and Canada. Settler Colonial Studies, 5(2), 161–173.
  75. ^ "Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future – Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada" (PDF). The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. 31 May 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 July 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  76. ^ Yaquis: The Story of a People's War and a Genocide in Mexico Paco Ignacio II
  77. ^
  78. ^ "Paco Ignacio Taibo II, documenta el brutal genocidio yaqui en nuestro país | Tukari".
  79. ^ "Mexico president wants no beef with Spain, hints at other apology requests". REUTERS. 26 March 2019. Archived from the original on 2 May 2019.
  80. ^ Pérez, Pilar (2016). Archivos del silencio. Estado, indígenas y violencia en Patagonia central, 1878–1941. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
  81. ^ Harambour, Alberto (2016). Un viaje a las colonias. Memorias de un ovejero escocés en Malvinas, Patagonia y Tierra del Fuego (1878–1898). Santiago: DIBAM-Centro de Investigaciones Diego Barros Arana.
  82. ^ Martínez Sarasola, Carlos (2013). Nuestros paisanos los indios, Vida, historia y destino de las comunidades indígenas en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Del Nuevo Extremo.
  83. ^ Martin 2004, pp. 740–746.
  84. ^ Yes, Native Americans Were the Victims of Genocide; History News Network; Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz; 12 May 2016
  85. ^ Biological Warfare in Eighteenth-Century North America: Beyond Jeffery Amherst Archived 3 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine; Fenn, Elizabeth A.; The Journal of American History (2000) 86 (4): 1552–1580; doi: 10.2307/2567577
  86. ^ Lord Jeffrey Amherst's letters discussing germ warfare against American Indians
  87. ^ Kotar, S.L.; Gessler, J.E. (2013). Smallpox: A History. McFarland. p. 111. ISBN 9780786493272.
  88. ^ Washburn, Kevin K. (February 2006). "American Indians, Crime, and the Law". Michigan Law Review. 104: 709, 735.
  89. ^ Valencia-Weber, Gloria (January 2003). "The Supreme Court's Indian Law Decisions: Deviations from Constitutional Principles and the Crafting of Judicial Smallpox Blankets". University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. 5: 405, 408–09.
  90. ^ Baird 1973.
  91. ^ Arthur Grenke (1 January 2005). God, Greed, and Genocide: The Holocaust Through the Centuries. New Academia Publishing, LLC. p. 161. ISBN 978-0-9767042-0-1.
  92. ^ Carter (III), Samuel (1976). Cherokee sunset: A nation betrayed: a narrative of travail and triumph, persecution and exile. New York: Doubleday, p. 232.
  93. ^ *Francis Paul Prucha (1 January 1995). The Great Father: The United States Government and the American Indians. U of Nebraska Press. p. 241 note 58. ISBN 978-0-8032-8734-1.
  94. ^ a b Stannard 1993, p. 124.
  95. ^ Mann 2009.
  96. ^ United States Congress Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, 1865 (testimonies and report)
  97. ^ Brown, Dee (2001) [1970]. "War Comes to the Cheyenne". Bury my heart at Wounded Knee. Macmillan. pp. 86–87. ISBN 978-0-8050-6634-0.
  98. ^ Thornton 1987, pp. 107–109.
  99. ^ "Minorities During the Gold Rush". California Secretary of State. Archived from the original on 1 February 2014.
  100. ^ Pritzker, Barry. 2000, A Native American Encyclopedia: History, Culture, and Peoples. Oxford University Press, p. 114
  101. ^ Cowan, Jill (19 June 2019). "'It's Called Genocide': Newsom Apologizes to the State's Native Americans". The New York Times. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  102. ^ [1] William Swain Letter Written from "The Diggings" in California
  103. ^ Hinton 2002, p. 57.
  104. ^ a b Churchill 2000, p. 433.
  105. ^ a b Scherrer 2003, p. 294.
  106. ^ The figurative demography of Algeria, Paris, Masson, 1880.
  107. ^ Kamel Kateb, Europeans, "Indigenes" and Jews in Algeria (1830–1962) , Paris, Ined / Puf, 2001.
  108. ^ Taithe, Bertrand (15 December 2010). "La famine de 1866–1868 : anatomie d'une catastrophe et construction médiatique d'un événement". Revue d'histoire du XIXe siècle. Société d'histoire de la révolution de 1848 et des révolutions du XIXe siècle (in French) (41): 113–127. doi:10.4000/rh19.4051. ISSN 1265-1354.
  109. ^ Kiernan, Ben (2007). Blood and Soil: A World History of Genocide and Extermination from Sparta to Darfur. p. 374. ISBN 978-0300100983.
  110. ^ Hinton 2002, p. 47.
  111. ^ "The Cambridge history of Africa: From the earliest times to c. 500 BC." John D. Fage (1982) Cambridge University Press, p. 748. ISBN 0-521-22803-4
  112. ^ Ball 2011, p. 17.
  113. ^ Sarkin-Hughes 2011, p. 3.
  114. ^ Weiser 2008, p. 24.
  115. ^ Meldrum 2004.
  116. ^ Schaller 2010, pp. 309–310.
  117. ^ The Cambridge History of Africa (1986), ed. J. D. Fage and R. Oliver
  118. ^ Hull 2003, p. 161.
  119. ^ Sarkin-Hughes 2011, p. 104.
  120. ^ Bisher 2006, p. 6.
  121. ^ Levene 2005, p. 294.
  122. ^ "The Amur's siren song". The Economist (From the print edition: Christmas Specials ed.). 17 December 2009. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
  123. ^ Black 2008,
  124. ^ Forsyth 1994, pp. 145–6.
  125. ^ Forsyth 1994, p. 146.
  126. ^ Forsyth 1994, p. 147.
  127. ^ Jack 2008, p. 388.
  128. ^ "Condé Nast's Traveler, Volume 36" 2001, p. 280.
  129. ^ "Yearbook" 1992, p. 46.
  130. ^ Mote 1998, p. 44.
  131. ^ Etkind 2013, p. 78.
  132. ^ Forsyth 1994, p. 151.
  133. ^ Batalden 1997, p. 36.
  134. ^ a b Fogarty, Philippa (6 June 2008). "Recognition at last for Japan's Ainu". BBC. Retrieved 7 June 2008.
  135. ^ " Tokyo’s thriving Ainu community keeps traditional culture alive Archived 2013-11-04 at," Japan Today, 1 March 2009.
  136. ^ Thomas, 1989 p. 227.
  137. ^ McCarthy, Terry (22 September 1992). "Ainu people lay ancient claim to Kurile Islands: The hunters and fishers who lost their land to the Russians and Japanese are gaining the confidence to demand their rights". The Independent.
  139. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Rabson, Steve (2014). Resistant Islands: Okinawa confronts Japan and the United States. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-4422-1562-7.
  140. ^ Pearson, Richard (2013). Ancient Ryukyu: An Archaeological Study of Islan Communities. University of Hawai'i Press. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-8248-3712-9.
  141. ^ a b c Akamine, Mamoru (2017). The Ryukyu Kingdom: Corner Stone of East Asia. University of Hawai'i Press. p. 145. ISBN 9780824855178.
  142. ^ a b c d Allen, Matthew (2002). Identity and Resistance in Okinawa. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC. p. 36. ISBN 0-7425-1714-4.
  143. ^ a b Hein, Laura Elizabeth (2003). Islands of Discontent: Okinwan Responses to Japanese and American Power. Asia/ Pacific/ Perspectives. pp. 1–23.
  144. ^ "Oroqen |". Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  145. ^ "The Oroqen Ethnic Group". 21 June 2005.
  146. ^ "The Oroqen ethnic minority". Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the Republic of Estonia. 17 May 2004.
  147. ^ Hays, Jeffrey (2008). "Oroqen Under the Japanese and Communist Chinese". Facts and Details. Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  148. ^ "China's ethnic minorities".
  149. ^ Carsten Naeher; Giovanni Stary; Michael Weiers (2002). Proceedings of the First International Conference on Manchu-Tungus Studies, Bonn, August 28 – September 1, 2000: Trends in Tungusic and Siberian linguistics. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 120–. ISBN 978-3-447-04628-2.
  150. ^ Wu, Haiyun (28 July 2017). "The Last of the Oroqen Hunters". Sixth Tone.
  151. ^ James Stuart Olson (1998). An Ethnohistorical Dictionary of China. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 141–. ISBN 978-0-313-28853-1.
  152. ^ "Hezhen Nationality".
  153. ^ "Hezhen". Countries and their Cultures. Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  154. ^ "HEZHEN". Facts and Details. Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  155. ^ Zhang, T. (February 1992). "Hezhen nationality – China's smallest ethnic group". China Popul Today. 9 (1): 11–2. PMID 12285646.
  156. ^ "Hezhe Ethnic Minority".
  157. ^ Michael Edmund Clarke, In the Eye of Power (doctoral thesis), Brisbane 2004, p37 Archived 6 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  158. ^ Dr. Mark Levene Archived 16 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Southampton University, see "Areas where I can offer Postgraduate Supervision". Retrieved 9 February 2009.
  159. ^ A. Dirk Moses (2008). "Empire, Colony, Genocide: Conquest, Occupation, and Subaltern Resistance in World History". Berghahn Books. p.188. ISBN 1845454529
  160. ^ Kim 2008, p. 308
  161. ^ Kim 2008, p. 134
  162. ^ Kim 2008, p. 49
  163. ^ Kim 2008, p. 139.
  164. ^ "Settler Colonialism – Anthropology – Oxford Bibliographies – obo". Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  165. ^ pp. 390–391
  166. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 4 January 2017. Retrieved 4 January 2017.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  167. ^ "Māori Population Decline". New Zealand Wars. Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  168. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 14 March 2017. Retrieved 4 January 2017.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  169. ^ pp. 11–12
  170. ^ corporateName=Australian Electoral Commission; address=50 Marcus Clarke Street, Canberra ACT 2600; contact=13 23 26. "AEC redirection page". Australian Electoral Commission. Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  171. ^ "Status of Reconciliation" (PDF). Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  172. ^ "Sterilization of indigenous women an act of genocide, new book says". CBC. 27 August 2015. Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  173. ^ McDonnell, M. A., & Moses, A. D. (2005). Raphael Lemkin as historian of genocide in the Americas. Journal of Genocide Research, 7(4), 501–529
  174. ^ Empire: how Britain made the modern world, Volume 2003, Part 2, Niall Ferguson, page 111, Allen Lane, 2003
  175. ^ "What did the British Empire ever do for Ireland:". Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  176. ^ "Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native" (PDF). Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  177. ^ Henry Reynolds, 'Genocide in Tasmania?', in A. Dirk Moses (ed.) Genocide and settler society: frontier violence and stolen indigenous children in Australian history, Berghahn Books, 2004 p.128.
  178. ^ Tatz 2006, p. 125.
  179. ^ Kiernan, Ben (2002). "Cover-up and Denial of Genocide: Australia, the USA, East Timor, and the Aborigines". Critical Asian Studies. 34 (2): 163–192. doi:10.1080/14672710220146197.
  180. ^ Kiernan 2007, pp. 249–309.
  181. ^ Tatz 2006.
  182. ^ Moses 2004.
  183. ^ Tatz 2006, p. 128.
  184. ^ Tatz 2006, pp. 130–31.
  185. ^ Tatz 2006, p. 127.
  186. ^ Tatz 2006, pp. 130–134.
  187. ^ The World History Association Book Prize Past Winners Archived 11 December 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  188. ^ Jones, Adam (16 December 2016). "Chapter 2: State and Empire". Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction. Routledge. ISBN 9781317533856.
  189. ^ Powell, Christopher (15 June 2011). Barbaric Civilization: A Critical Sociology of Genocide. McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP. pp. 238–245. ISBN 9780773585560.
  190. ^ "Why do they hide?". Survival International. Retrieved 27 August 2013.
  191. ^ "Horrific treatment of Amazon Indians exposed 100 years ago today". Survival International. Retrieved 27 August 2013.
  192. ^ Arens 2010, p. 123.
  193. ^ Jonassohn 1998, p. 257.
  194. ^ Begovich 2007, p. 166.
  195. ^ Quigley 2006, p. 125.
  196. ^ Gray 1994.
  197. ^ a b O'Brien 2004.
  198. ^ Mey 1984.
  199. ^ Moshin 2003.
  200. ^ Roy 2000.
  201. ^ Chakma & Hill 2013.
  202. ^ a b "Bangladesh: Indigenous Peoples engulfed in Chittagong Hill Tracts land conflict". Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  203. ^ "Tipraland movement: Autonomy is core to Tripura's tribal politics, but gaining power in state Assembly would be wiser". Firstpost. Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  204. ^ Watts 2013.
  205. ^ Garfield 2001, p. 143.
  206. ^ Warren 2001, p. 84.
  207. ^ Jackson 2009.
  208. ^ Jackson 2002.
  209. ^ "Update 2011 – Colombia". Retrieved 27 August 2013.
  210. ^ Pedro García Hierro. 2008. Colombia: The Case of the Naya. IWGIA Report 2 [2]
  211. ^ United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (18 October 2012). "UNHCR report on Indigenous peoples in Colombia". Retrieved 27 August 2013.
  212. ^ "Situation of Human Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Colombia". 16 March 2013. Retrieved 27 August 2013.
  213. ^ User Name: Brandon Barrett (27 April 2012). "Indigenous leader accuses Colombian govt of genocide Colombia News | Colombia Reports – Colombia News | Colombia Reports". Retrieved 27 August 2013.
  214. ^ Altshuler 2011, p. 636.
  215. ^ BBC News 2003.
  216. ^ "DR Congo Pygmies 'exterminated'". BBC News. 6 July 2004. Retrieved 27 August 2013.
  217. ^ "Pygmies today in Africa". Archived from the original on 17 November 2008. Retrieved 27 August 2013.
  218. ^ rebels
  219. ^ a b Hitchcock & Koperski 2008, p. 589.
  220. ^ Dunn, James (2009). "Genocide in East Timor". In Samuel Totten; William S. Parsons (eds.). Centuries of Genocide: Essays and Eyewitness Accounts. New York: Routledge.
  221. ^ Cotton, James (2000). "The Emergence of an Independent East Timor: National and Regional Challenges". Contemporary Southeast Asia. 22 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1355/CS22-1A.
  222. ^ Powell, Sian (19 January 2006). "UN verdict on East Timor". The Australian. Archived from the original on 12 May 2006.
  223. ^ Sanford 2008, p. 545.
  224. ^ Franco 2013, p. 80.
  225. ^ Will Grant (11 May 2013). "BBC News – Guatemala's Rios Montt found guilty of genocide". Retrieved 27 August 2013.
  226. ^ Reuters (20 May 2013). "Guatemala's top court annuls Rios Montt genocide conviction". Archived from the original on 16 June 2013.
  227. ^ "Ríos Montt genocide case collapses". The Guardian. 20 May 2013.
  228. ^ Vickers 2013, p. 142.
  229. ^ Premdas 1985, pp. 1056–1058.
  230. ^ Lowenstein Clinic report 2004, p. 71.
  231. ^ Lowenstein Clinic report 2004, p. 75.
  232. ^ Khokhryakova 1998, p. 475.
  233. ^ a b Milbrandt 2012.
  234. ^ "KNU President Saw Tamla Baw says peace needs a 1,000 more steps « Karen News". 2 February 2012. Archived from the original on 10 June 2015. Retrieved 27 August 2013.
  235. ^ Rogers 2004.
  236. ^ "Burma". World Without Genocide. 9 November 2010. Retrieved 27 August 2013.
  237. ^ Presse, Agence France (5 October 2017). "Bangladesh to build one of world's largest refugee camps for 800,000 Rohingya". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  238. ^ "Myanmar villages burn as Rakhine unrest rages". Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  239. ^ MRGI 2007, p. MRGI.
  240. ^ Gilbert 2006, p. 118.
  241. ^ Hitchcock & Koperski 2008, pp. 592–3.
  242. ^ Tibet – Summary of a Report on Tibet Archived 2012-04-02 at the Wayback Machine Submitted to the International Commission of Jurists by Shri Purshottam Trikamdas, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India
  243. ^ David White (2002). Himalayan Tragedy: The Story of Tibet's Panchen Lamas. Tibet Society of the UK. p. 98. ISBN 978-0-9542179-0-7.