Gerontology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Geroscience)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Elders playing cards in Amsterdam.

Gerontology is the study of the social, cultural, psychological, cognitive, and biological aspects of aging. The word was coined by Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov in 1903, from the Greek γέρων, geron, "old man" and -λογία, -logia, "study of".[1][2][3][4] The field is distinguished from geriatrics, which is the branch of medicine that specializes in the treatment of existing disease in older adults. Gerontologists include researchers and practitioners in the fields of biology, nursing, medicine, criminology, dentistry, social work, physical and occupational therapy, psychology, psychiatry, sociology, economics, political science, architecture, geography, pharmacy, public health, housing, and anthropology.[5]

The multidisciplinary nature of gerontology means that there are a number of sub-fields which overlap with gerontology. There are policy issues, for example, involved in government planning and the operation of nursing homes, investigating the effects of an aging population on society, and the design of residential spaces for older people that facilitate the development of a sense of place or home. Dr. Lawton, a behavioral psychologist at the Philadelphia Geriatric Center, was among the first to recognize the need for living spaces designed to accommodate the elderly, especially those with Alzheimer's disease. As an academic discipline the field is relatively new. The USC Leonard Davis School created the first PhD, master's and bachelor's degree programs in gerontology in 1975.

History[edit]

In the medieval Islamic world, several physicians wrote on issues related to Gerontology. Avicenna's The Canon of Medicine (1025) offered instruction for the care of the aged, including diet and remedies for problems including constipation.[6] Arabic physician Ibn Al-Jazzar Al-Qayrawani (Algizar, c. 898–980) wrote on the aches and conditions of the elderly (Ammar 1998, p. 4).[7] His scholarly work covers sleep disorders, forgetfulness, how to strengthen memory,[8][9] and causes of mortality. [10] Ishaq ibn Hunayn (died 910) also wrote works on the treatments for forgetfulness (U.S. National Library of Medicine, 1994).[11]

While the number of aged humans, and the life expectancy, tended to increase in every century since the 14th, society tended to consider caring for an elderly relative as a family issue. It was not until the coming of the Industrial Revolution that ideas shifted in favor of a societal care-system. Some early pioneers, such as Michel Eugène Chevreul, who himself lived to be 102, believed that aging itself should be a science to be studied. Élie Metchnikoff coined the term "gerontology" in 1903.[12]

Modern pioneers like James Birren began organizing gerontology as its own field in the 1940s, later being involved in starting a US government agency on aging – the National Institute on Aging[13] – programs in gerontology at the University of Southern California and University of California, Los Angeles, and as past president of the Gerontological Society of America (founded in 1945).[14]

With the population of people over 60 years old expected to be some 22% of the world's population by 2050, assessment and treatment methods for age-related disease burden – the term geroscience emerged in the early 21st century.[15][16][17]

Aging demographics[edit]

The world is forecast to undergo rapid population aging in the next several decades. In 1900, there were 3.1 million people aged 65 years and older living in the United States. However, this population continued to grow throughout the 20th century and reached 31.2, 35, and 40.3 million people in 1990, 2000, and 2010, respectively. Notably, in the United States and across the world, the "baby boomer" generation began to turn 65 in 2011. Recently, the population aged 65 years and older has grown at a faster rate than the total population in the United States. The total population increased by 9.7%, from 281.4 million to 308.7 million, between 2000 and 2010. However, the population aged 65 years and older increased by 15.1% during the same period.[18] It has been estimated that 25% of the population in the United States and Canada will be aged 65 years and older by 2025. Moreover, by 2050, it is predicted that, for the first time in United States history, the number of individuals aged 60 years and older will be greater than the number of children aged 0 to 14 years.[19] Those aged 85 years and older (oldest-old) are projected to increase from 5.3 million to 21 million by 2050.[20] Adults aged 85–89 years constituted the greatest segment of the oldest-old in 1990, 2000, and 2010. However, the largest percentage point increase among the oldest-old occurred in the 90- to 94-year-old age group, which increased from 25.0% in 1990 to 26.4% in 2010.[18]

With the rapid growth of the aging population, social work education and training specialized in older adults and practitioners interested in working with older adults are increasingly in demand.[21][22]

Gender differences with age[edit]

There has been a considerable disparity between the number of men and women in the older population in the United States. In both 2000 and 2010, women outnumbered men in the older population at every single year of age (e.g., 65 to 100 years and over). The sex ratio, which is a measure used to indicate the balance of males to females in a population, is calculated by taking the number of males divided by the number of females, and multiplying by 100. Therefore, the sex ratio is the number of males per 100 females. In 2010, there were 90.5 males per 100 females in the 65-year-old population. However, this represented an increase from 1990 when there were 82.7 males per 100 females, and from 2000 when the sex ratio was 88.1. Although the gender gap between men and women has narrowed, women continue to have a greater life expectancy and lower mortality rates at older ages relative to men. For example, the Census 2010 reported that there were approximately twice as many women as men living in the United States at 89 years of age (361,309 versus 176,689, respectively).[18]

Geographic distribution of older adults in the United States[edit]

The number and percentage of older adults living in the United States vary across the four different regions (Northeast, Midwest, West, and South) defined by the United States census. In 2010, the South contained the greatest number of people aged 65 years and older and 85 years and older. However, proportionately, the Northeast contains the largest percentage of adults aged 65 years and older (14.1%), followed by the Midwest (13.5%), the South (13.0%), and the West (11.9%). Relative to the Census 2000, all geographic regions demonstrated positive growth in the population of adults aged 65 years and older and 85 years and older. The most rapid growth in the population of adults aged 65 years and older was evident in the West (23.5%), which showed an increase from 6.9 million in 2000 to 8.5 million in 2010. Likewise, in the population aged 85 years and older, the West (42.8%) also showed the fastest growth and increased from 806,000 in 2000 to 1.2 million in 2010. It is worth highlighting that Rhode Island was the only state that experienced a reduction in the number of people aged 65 years and older, and declined from 152,402 in 2000 to 151,881 in 2010. Conversely, all states exhibited an increase in the population of adults aged 85 years and older from 2000 to 2010.[18]

Biogerontology[edit]

The hand of an older adult

Biogerontology is the special sub-field of gerontology concerned with the biological aging process, its evolutionary origins, and potential means to intervene in the process. Aim of biogerontology is to prevent age-related disease by intervening in aging processes or even eliminate aging per se. Some argue that aging fits the criteria of disease, therefore aging is disease and should be treated as disease.[23][24][25] In 2008 Aubrey de Grey said that in case of suitable funding and involvement of specialists there is a 50% chance, that in 25-30 years humans will have technology saving people from dying of old age, regardless of the age at which they will be at that time.[26] His idea is to repair inside cells and between them all that can be repaired using modern technology, allowing people to live until time when technology progress will allow to cure deeper damage. This concept got the name "longevity escape velocity".

Social gerontology[edit]

Social gerontology is a multi-disciplinary sub-field that specializes in studying or working with older adults. Social gerontologists may have degrees or training in social work, nursing, psychology, sociology, demography, public health, or other social science disciplines. Social gerontologists are responsible for educating, researching, and advancing the broader causes of older people.

Because issues of life span and life extension need numbers to quantify them, there is an overlap with demography. Those who study the demography of the human life span differ from those who study the social demographics of aging.

Social theories of aging[edit]

Several theories of aging are developed to observe the aging process of older adults in society as well as how these processes are interpreted by men and women as they age.[27]

Activity theory[edit]

Activity theory was developed and elaborated by Cavan, Havighurst, and Albrecht. According to this theory, older adults' self-concept depends on social interactions. In order for older adults to maintain morale in old age, substitutions must be made for lost roles. Examples of lost roles include retirement from a job or loss of a spouse.[27]

Activity is preferable to inactivity because it facilitates well-being on multiple levels. Because of improved general health and prosperity in the older population, remaining active is more feasible now than when this theory was first proposed by Havighurst nearly six decades ago. The activity theory is applicable for a stable, post-industrial society, which offers its older members many opportunities for meaningful participation. Weakness: Some aging persons cannot maintain a middle-aged lifestyle, due to functional limitations, lack of income, or lack of a desire to do so. Many older adults lack the resources to maintain active roles in society. On the flip side, some elders may insist on continuing activities in late life that pose a danger to themselves and others, such as driving at night with low visual acuity or doing maintenance work to the house while climbing with severely arthritic knees. In doing so, they are denying their limitations and engaging in unsafe behaviors.[28]

Disengagement theory[edit]

Disengagement theory was developed by Cumming and Henry. According to this theory, older adults and society engage in a mutual separation from each other. An example of mutual separation is retirement from the workforce. A key assumption of this theory is that older adults lose "ego-energy" and become increasingly self-absorbed. Additionally, disengagement leads to higher morale maintenance than if older adults try to maintain social involvement. This theory is heavily criticized for having an escape clause - namely, that older adults who remain engaged in society are unsuccessful adjusters to old age.[27]

Gradual withdrawal from society and relationships preserves social equilibrium and promotes self-reflection for elders who are freed from societal roles. It furnishes an orderly means for the transfer of knowledge, capital, and power from the older generation to the young. It makes it possible for society to continue functioning after valuable older members die.

Continuity theory[edit]

Continuity theory is an elusive concept. On one hand, to exhibit continuity can mean to remain the same, to be uniform, homogeneous, unchanging, even humdrum. This static view of continuity is not very applicable to human aging. On the other hand, a dynamic view of continuity starts with the idea of a basic the structure which persists over time, but it allows for a variety of changes to occur within the context provided by the basic structure. The basic structure is coherent: It has an orderly or logical relation of parts that is recognizably unique and that allows us to differentiate that structure from others. With the introduction of the concept of time, ideas such as direction, sequence, character development, and story line enter into the concept of continuity as it is applied to the evolution of a human being. In this theory, a dynamic concept of continuity is developed and applied to the issue of adaptation to normal aging.[29]

A central premise of continuity theory is that, in making adaptive choices, middle-aged and older adults attempt to preserve and maintain existing internal and external structures and that they prefer to accomplish this objective by using continuity (i.e., applying familiar strategies in familiar arenas of life). In middle and later life, adults are drawn by the weight of past experience to use continuity as a primary adaptive strategy for dealing with changes associated with normal aging. To the extent that change builds upon, and has links to, the person's past, change is a part of continuity. As a result of both their own perceptions and pressures from the social environment, individuals who are adapting to normal aging are both predisposed and motivated toward inner psychological continuity as well as outward continuity of social behavior and circumstances.[30]

Continuity theory views both internal and external continuity as robust adaptive strategies that are supported by both individual preference and social sanctions. Continuity theory consists of general adaptive principles that people who are normally aging could be expected to follow, explanations of how these principles work, and a specification of general areas of life in which these principles could be expected to apply. Accordingly, continuity theory has enormous potential as a general theory of adaptation to individual aging.[31]

Age stratification theory[edit]

According to this theory, older adults born during different time periods form cohorts that define "age strata". There are two differences among strata: chronological age and historical experience. This theory makes two arguments. 1. Age is a mechanism for regulating behavior and as a result determines access to positions of power. 2. Birth cohorts play an influential role in the process of social change.[27]

Life course theory[edit]

According to this theory, which stems from the life course perspective (Bengston and Allen, 1993),[32] aging occurs from birth to death. Aging involves social, psychological, and biological processes. Additionally, aging experiences are shaped by cohort and period effects.[27]

Also reflecting the life course focus, consider the implications for how societies might function when age-based norms vanish—a consequence of the deinstitutionalization of the life course— and suggest that these implications pose new challenges for theorizing aging and the life course in postindustrial societies. Dramatic reductions in mortality, morbidity, and fertility over the past several decades have so shaken up the organization of the life course and the nature of educational, work, family, and leisure experiences that it is now possible for individuals to become old in new ways. The configurations and content of other life stages are being altered as well, especially for women. In consequence, theories of age and aging will need to be reconceptualized.[33]

Cumulative advantage/disadvantage theory[edit]

According to this theory, which was developed beginning in the 1960s by Derek Price and Robert Merton and elaborated on by several researchers such as Dale Dannefer,[34] inequalities have a tendency to become more pronounced throughout the aging process. A paradigm of this theory can be expressed in the adage "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer". Advantages and disadvantages in early life stages have a profound effect throughout the life span. However, advantages and disadvantages in middle adulthood have a direct influence on economic and health status in later life.[27]

Environmental gerontology[edit]

Environmental gerontology is a specialization within gerontology that seeks an understanding and interventions to optimize the relationship between aging persons and their physical and social environments.[35][36][37]

The field emerged in the 1930s during the first studies on behavioral and social gerontology. In the 1970s and 1980s, research confirmed the importance of the physical and social environment in understanding the aging population and improved the quality of life in old age.[38] Studies of environmental gerontology indicate that older people prefer to age in their immediate environment, whereas spatial experience and place attachment are important for understanding the process.[39]

Some research indicates that the physical-social environment is related to the longevity and quality of life of the elderly. Precisely, the natural environment (such as natural therapeutic landscapes, therapeutic garden) contributes to active and healthy aging in the place.[40][41]

Jurisprudential gerontology[edit]

Jurisprudential gerontology (sometimes referred to as "geriatric jurisprudence") is a specialization within gerontology that looks into the ways laws and legal structures interact with the aging experience. The field started from legal scholars in the field of elder law, which found that looking into legal issues of older persons without a broader inter-disciplinary perspective does not provide the ideal legal outcome. Using theories such as therapeutic jurisprudence, jurisprudential scholars critically examined existing legal institutions (e.g. adult guardianship, end of life care, or nursing homes regulations) and showed how law should look more closely to the social and psychological aspects of its real-life operation.[42] Other streams within jurisprudential gerontology also encouraged physicians and lawyers to try to improve their cooperation and better understand how laws and regulatory institutions affect health and well being of older persons.[43]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Harris, D.K. (1988). Dictionary of Gerontology. New York: Greenwood Press. p. 80.
  2. ^ Metchnikoff, Elie (1903). The Nature of Man: Studies in Optimistic Philosophy. Translated by Mitchell, P Chalmers. New York and London: G.P. Putnam's Sons. OCLC 173625.
  3. ^ Grignolio, Andrea; Franceschi, Claudio (2012-06-15). "History of Research into Ageing/Senescence". doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0023955. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. ^ Stambler, Ilia (2014-06-17). "The Unexpected Outcomes of Anti-Aging, Rejuvenation, and Life Extension Studies: An Origin of Modern Therapies". Rejuvenation Research. 17 (3): 297–305. doi:10.1089/rej.2013.1527. PMID 24524368.
  5. ^ Hooyman, N.R.; Kiyak, H.A. (2011). Social gerontology: A multidisciplinary perspective (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education. ISBN 978-0205763139.
  6. ^ Howell, Trevor H. (1987). "Avicenna and His Regimen of Old Age". Age and Ageing. 16 (1): 58–59. doi:10.1093/ageing/16.1.58. PMID 3551552.
  7. ^ Ammar, S (1998). "Ibn Al Jazzar and the Kairouan médical school of the tenth century AD" (PDF). Vesaiius. 4 (1): 3–4. PMID 11620335.
  8. ^ "Ibn al-Jazzār, Abū Ja'far Ahmad ibn Ibrāhīm ibn Abī Khālid (d. 979/369)". Islamic Medical Manuscripts. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved 24 September 2013.
  9. ^ [Geritt Bos, Ibn al-Jazzar, Risala fi l-isyan (Treatise on forgetfulness), London, 1995 ]
  10. ^ Al Jazzar Archived July 6, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  11. ^ "Specialized literature". Islamic culture and medical arts. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved 24 September 2013.
  12. ^ Metchnikoff, E. (1903). The nature of man. Studies in optimistic philosophy. London: Heinemann. p. 298. An earlier usage, however, was recorded by German philosopher Wilhelm Traugott Krug in his General Dictionary of the Philosophical Sciences. According to Krug, the term Gerontologia is found in the Colloquies by Erasmus where it refers to the conversation of old men (colloquium senile). See Krug, 1838, p. 453-454.
  13. ^ "About the National Institute on Aging". National Institute on Aging, US National Institutes of Health. 2018. Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  14. ^ Newcomb, Beth (15 January 2016). "In memoriam: James E. Birren, 97". University of Southern California - News. Retrieved 5 March 2018.
  15. ^ Burch, J. B; Augustine, A. D; Frieden, L. A; Hadley, E; Howcroft, T. K; Johnson, R; Khalsa, P. S; Kohanski, R. A; Li, X. L; MacChiarini, F; Niederehe, G; Oh, Y. S; Pawlyk, A. C; Rodriguez, H; Rowland, J. H; Shen, G. L; Sierra, F; Wise, B. C (2014). "Advances in Geroscience: Impact on Healthspan and Chronic Disease". The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 69 (Suppl 1): S1–S3. doi:10.1093/gerona/glu041. PMC 4036419. PMID 24833579.
  16. ^ Seals, D. R; Justice, J. N; Larocca, T. J (2015). "Physiological geroscience: Targeting function to increase healthspan and achieve optimal longevity". The Journal of Physiology. 594 (8): 2001–2024. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2014.282665. PMC 4933122. PMID 25639909.
  17. ^ Kohanski, R. A; Deeks, S. G; Gravekamp, C; Halter, J. B; High, K; Hurria, A; Fuldner, R; Green, P; Huebner, R; MacChiarini, F; Sierra, F (2016). "Reverse geroscience: How does exposure to early diseases accelerate the age-related decline in health?". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1386 (1): 30–44. Bibcode:2016NYASA1386...30K. doi:10.1111/nyas.13297. hdl:2027.42/135360. PMID 27907230. S2CID 13783275.
  18. ^ a b c d Carrie A. Werner (2010). "The Older Population: 2010" (PDF). 2010 Census Briefs. U.S. Census Bureau. C2010BR-09.
  19. ^ Taylor, Albert W.; Johnson, Michel J. (2008). Physiology of Exercise and Healthy Aging. Human Kinetics. ISBN 978-0-7360-5838-4.
  20. ^ "Population". 2008 Older Americans : Key indicators of Well-Being. 2008. Archived from the original on 2013-02-10. Retrieved 2013-01-04.
  21. ^ "Institute for Geriatric Social Work". Boston University. Archived from the original on 2010-07-11.
  22. ^ "Geriatric Social Work Initiative".
  23. ^ Stambler, Ilia (2017-10-01). "Recognizing Degenerative Aging as a Treatable Medical Condition: Methodology and Policy". Aging and Disease. 8 (5): 583–589. doi:10.14336/AD.2017.0130. PMC 5614323. PMID 28966803.
  24. ^ The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (2018-08-01). "Opening the door to treating ageing as a disease". The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 6 (8): 587. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30214-6. PMID 30053981.
  25. ^ Khaltourina, Daria; Matveyev, Yuri; Alekseev, Aleksey; Cortese, Franco; Ioviţă, Anca (July 2020). "Aging Fits the Disease Criteria of the International Classification of Diseases". Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 189: 111230. doi:10.1016/j.mad.2020.111230. PMID 32251691. S2CID 214779653.
  26. ^ de Grey, Aubrey D. N. J.; Rae, Michael (October 14, 2008). Ending Aging. St. Martin's Griffin. p. 15. ISBN 978-0312367077.
  27. ^ a b c d e f Phillipson, C.; Baars, J. (2007). "Ch. 4: Social theory and social aging". In Bond, J.; Peace, S. M.; Dittmann-Kohli, F.; Westerhof, G. (eds.). Aging in Society (3rd ed.). SAGE. pp. 68–84. ISBN 978-1-4129-0020-1.
  28. ^ VickyRN. (August 2, '09). Theories of Aging (Part 3) - Sociological Theories. Retrieved Friday, April 20, 2012, from http://allnurses-breakroom.com/showthread.php?t=412760
  29. ^ Blalock, H.M. (1982). Conceptualization and measurement in the social sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage. ISBN 978-0803918047.
  30. ^ Hage, J. (1972). Techniques and problems of theory construction in sociology. New York: Wiley Interscience. ISBN 978-0471338604.
  31. ^ Kaplan, Abraham (1964). The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-0-7658-0448-8.
  32. ^ Life Course Theory-Historical Development, Key Principles and Concepts, Selected Research Applications:http://family.jrank.org/pages/1074/Life-Course-Theory.html
  33. ^ Rowe, J.W.; Kahn, R.L. (1998). Successful aging. Aging (Milan, Italy). 10. New York: Pantheon. pp. 142–4. ISBN 978-0375400452. PMID 9666196.
    Webster, N. (2003). Webster's new American dictionary. New York: HarperCollins.
  34. ^ Dannefer D (November 2003). "Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: cross-fertilizing age and social science theory". J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 58 (6): S327–37. doi:10.1093/geronb/58.6.S327. PMID 14614120. S2CID 1092132.
  35. ^ Sanchez-Gonzalez, D.; Rodriguez-Rodriguez, V. (2016). Environmental Gerontology in Europe and Latin America. Policies and perspectives on environment and aging. New York: Springer Publishing Company. p. 284. ISBN 978-3-319-21418-4.
  36. ^ Rowles, Graham D.; Bernard, Miriam (2013). Environmental Gerontology: Making Meaningful Places in Old Age. New York: Springer Publishing Company. p. 320. ISBN 978-0826108135.
  37. ^ Scheidt, Rick J.; Schwarz, Benyamin (2013). Environmental Gerontology. What Now?. New York: Routledge. p. 338. ISBN 978-0-415-62616-3.
  38. ^ Wahl, H-W.; Scheidt, R.J.; Windley, P.G. (2004). Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics. Focus on Aging context: Socio-Physical Environments. New York: Springer Publishing Company. p. 384. ISBN 978-0826117342.
  39. ^ Andrews, GJ.; Phillips, DR. (2005). Aging and Place: Perspectives, Policy, Practice. London: Routledge. p. 272. ISBN 978-0415481656.
  40. ^ Sanchez-Gonzalez, D (2015). "Physical-social environments and aging population from environmental gerontology and geography. Socio-spatial implications in Latin America". Revista de Geografía Norte Grande. 60 (60): 97–114. doi:10.4067/S0718-34022015000100006.
  41. ^ Sanchez-Gonzalez, D.; Adame-Rivera, LM.; Rodriguez-Rodriguez, V. (2018). "Natural landscape and healthy aging in place: The case of the Cumbres of Monterrey National Park in Mexico". Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles. 76 (76): 20–51. doi:10.21138/bage.2514. hdl:10261/163106.
  42. ^ Kapp, Marshall B. (1996). "Therapeutic Jurisprudence and End-of-Life Medical Care: Physician Perceptions of a Statute's Impact Medical Law 15 Medicine and Law 1996". Medicine and Law. 15 (2): 201–17. PMID 8908972. Retrieved 2018-03-20.
  43. ^ Doron, Israel; Meenan, Helen (2012). "Time for Geriatric Jurisprudence". Gerontology. 58 (3): 193–6. doi:10.1159/000335324. ISSN 0304-324X. PMID 22538767. S2CID 21550838.

External links[edit]