|Patagona gigas in Chile|
G.R. Gray, 1840
The giant hummingbird (Patagona gigas) is the largest member of the hummingbird family, weighing 18–24 g (0.63–0.85 oz) with a wingspan measuring approximately 21.5 cm (8.5 in) in length, and length of 23 cm (9.1 in). This is approximately the same length as a European starling or a northern cardinal, though the giant hummingbird is considerably lighter due to its more slender build and fairly long bill. It is the only member of the genus Patagona. This weight is almost twice that of the next heaviest recorded species, and ten times that of the smallest humming bird, Calypte helenae, the "bee hummingbird."
In Bolivia, the giant hummingbird is known in Quechua as burro q'enti. The Spanish word burro refers to its dull, relatively unattractive plumage compared to other locally occurring hummingbirds (e.g., red-tailed comet). Typically members of P. gigas can be identified using their comparative size and characteristics such as the presence of an eye-ring, straight bill (longer than the head), dull colouration, very long wings (approaching tail tip when stowed), long and moderately forked tail, feathered tarsi to the toes and comparatively large sturdy feet. There is no difference between the sexes. Juvenile specimens can be determined by observing small corrugations on the lateral areas of the beak culmen.
The sub-species are visually distinguishable. P. g. peruviana has an overall yellowish brown appearance as well as the presence of a white on the chin and throat, where P. g. gigas has more of a olive green/brown colouration and absence of white on the chin and throat.
The Giant Hummingbird is distinct from other Hummingbirds in flight with occasional gliding flight observed, very rare in Trochilids. Literature leads to the belief this flight is strongly correlated to the elongated wings of the giant hummingbird, allowing more efficient glides than other Trochilids. The Giant hummingbird’s voice is a singular loud, sharp and whistling “chip”.
Belonging to the family Trochilidae (Hummingbirds), Patagona gigas is one of approximately 331 described species in this family, making it the second largest group of new world birds, trochilids are further divided into ~104 genera. It is thought that the species is comparatively old and, for the most part, a failed evolutionary experiment in enlarging hummingbird size given it has not diverged and proliferated.
Traditional morphologic taxonomic inquiries show that P. gigas is substantially different from the other taxa of hummingbirds. In 2008 a phylogenetic review established that there is a 97.5% likelihood that P. gigas has diverged substantially enough from the proposed 3 closest phylogenetic clades to be considered belonging to a single specie clade named Patagonini. This lines up with International Ornithological Congress’s (IOC) taxonomic classification that Patagona is a genus containing only P. gigas.
However two subspecies P. gigas gigas and P. gigas peruviana are recognised. These subspecies are thought to have emerged due to partial geographical separation of populations by volcanic activities in the Andes predating the Miocene period, however there remain areas of contact between the species hence the lack of true speciation. The proposed contemporary phylogenetic clade system for hummingbirds suggested by McGuire et al. (2009) accommodates for future study finding a possible separate species of Patagona.
Distribution and Habitat
The Giant Hummingbird is widely distributed throughout the length of the Andes on both the east and west sides. P. gigas typically inhabit the higher altitude scrubland and forests that line the slopes of the Andes during the summer and then retreat to similar, lower altitude habitats in winter months. The species persists through a large altitude range also with specimens retrieved from sea level up to 4600m. They have shown to be fairly resilient to urbanisation and agricultural activities, however the removal of vegetation limits their distribution in dense city areas and industrial zones.
P. g. peruviana has been found from Equador to the South-Eastern mountains of Peru and P. g. gigas from Northern Bolivia and Chile to Argentina. Contact between subspecies is thought to most likely occur around the eastern slopes of the north Peruvian Andes.
Global range and population
The range of Patagona gigas is rather large, and its global Extent of Occurrence is estimated at 1,200,000 km2. Its global population is believed to be not less than 10,000 adults.
Hummingbirds are extremely agile and acrobatic flyers, regularly partaking in sustained hovering flight, often used not only to feed on the wing but to protect their territory and perform courting rituals. P. gigas is typical in that it will brazenly defend its precious energy-rich flower territory from other species and other giant hummingbirds. These birds are typically seen alone, in pairs or small family groups.
For a hummingbird P. gigas averages a slow hovering state of 15 wing beats per second. Resting heart rate for P. gigas is 300/min and peaks at 1020/min. Energy requirements for hummingbirds do not scale evenly with size increases, meaning a larger bird such as P. gigas requires comparatively more energy per gram to hover than a smaller bird. This demanding homeostatic state means that consuming a huge 4300 calories/hr is the estimated requirement to sustain this. This along with the oxygen availability/hypobaric limitations for hovering at altitudes that the giant hummingbird lives in appears to suggest that P. gigas is likely to be very close to the viable maximum size for a hummingbird.
Hummingbird skeletal anatomy is vastly different to that of a traditional forward flying bird, with elongated hand bones, shortened humerus and forearm bones, thickened wing bones to support straight wing beating and re-designing of the shoulder joint to accommodate the rotation of the humerus allowing production of thrust on back strokes.
The cellular anatomy of hummingbird's flight musculature is very similar to other small bird species, all their flight muscles are composed of only fast oxidative glycolytic muscle fibres which allow the sustained high frequency wing beats typically seen in these birds. These muscle fibres are filled with mitochondria (around 50% of volume) enabling high frequency wing beats to be sustained over extended periods using oxidative energy. A very well developed pathway that transports sugars to the muscles for use very efficiently supports these mitochondria: hummingbirds are also thought to be able to oxidise dietary fructose directly without the additional step of converting it to glucose. These factors combine to allow hummingbirds to consume oxygen at the highest known rate (over 5x the rate of dogs). Hummingbirds also have a higher amount of this energy thirsty muscle type elsewhere in their skeletal musculature, this is thought to help them combat loss of heat to the environment due to large surface area/volume ratio.
Additionally, Trochilids have developed two useful physiological responses that allow them to survive in harsher temperatures and environments that are lacking or devoid of food for extended periods. They can enter a resting hypothermic state to conserve energy but be able to respond to external stimuli(McKechnie & Lovegrove, 2002). Or are even able to reduce their body temperature and enter torpor for hours on end - this reduces their metabolic rate and allows great energy conservation in extreme circumstances. Hovering flight metabolic demand has sculpted even the genome of Trochilids with them maintaining the smallest genomes in the avian sphere.
P. gigas is obligate nectarvorious and feeds from a range of flowers. The female Giant Hummingbird has been observed ingesting sources of high amounts of calcium (sand, soil, slaked lime and wood ash) post reproductive season to replenish the calcium used in egg production, nectar has a very low calcium content necessitating this. Similarly a nectar based diet is low in proteins and various minerals, this is countered by consuming insects on occasion. Though there is a report of a nesting Broad-tailed Hummingbird that sustained itself for several days only upon arthropods, this suggests that insects may have a larger part in hummingbird diet in some instances than previously thought. Supporting this is the fact that hummingbirds have evolved the ability to bend their mandibular bone mid way down, manipulate their bottom jaw laterally and snap their jaw shut faster to accommodate better capture of flying insects.
P. gigas regularly visits and feeds from the flowers of Puya genus in Chile with which it enjoys a symbiotic relationship with trading pollination for food. Due to the extremely high metabolic requirements of such a large hovering bird at high altitudes, Patagona is aided by its wide range of flowers it will feed from, allowing for more efficient energy collection. It is known to feed from multiple columnar cacti species including Oreocereus celsianus, Echinopsis Atacamensis Subsp. Pasacana and Salvia haenkei. There is limited primary literature for exactly how wide the scope of P. gigas diet is, due probably to the challenge of its vast distribution. But drawing inference from the large amount of nectar required to be routinely ingested by such a large hummingbird it is safe to say it is quite the generalist out of necessity.
Interestingly, the majority of flowers visited by hummingbirds are reported as being red in colour. This has traditionally been thought to be due to hummingbird preferencing red that dictated the evolution of the flowers it visits and pollinates, however this view has not been well backed in experimental findings, instead it is hypothesised that hummingbird flowers are red as a form of communication that allows easy identification of the best flowers for a bird to visit when it is travelling through new areas, a symbiotic advantage.
Considering the energy rich nature of nectar as a food source it attracts a large range of visitors apart from the desired hummingbird, which will often be the flower’s most efficient pollinator due to evolutionary pressures. These other visitors, because they are not designed to access the well hidden bounty of nectar often inflict damage to the flowers and prevent further nectar production. P. gigas, because of its high energy requirements, is known to alter its foraging behaviour as a direct response to nectar robbing from other birds and animals, this impacts the viability of the Hummingbird in an area with significant numbers of nectar robbers as well as indirectly effecting the plants with reduced pollination occurring. If these nectar thieves are ever introduced species it is reasonable to predict that their activities will significantly impact the local ecosystem through the previously mentioned mechanisms over a moderate period of time. This could prove to be a future risk for P. gigas populations due to their close to physical limit metabolic demands.
There is little specific primary literature that has investigated P. gigas’s reproductive practices and therefore educated generalisations from literature on other hummingbird species can be drawn on. Hummingbird males tend to have polygynous, occasionally promiscuous, behaviours and no involvement post copulation. A P. gigas nest is small considering the size of the bird, typically made near water sources and perched upon a branch parallel to the ground of a tree or shrub. Females build the nest and lay a clutch of two eggs in the Summer period.
Incubation is a particularly tricky stage for hummingbirds, with their small body mass and high energy requirements they need to leave the nest more regularly than most land birds. However, their eggs have adapted to be resilient to temporary significant fluctuations in temperature (one record shows an egg dropping to 14.5 degrees Celsius) so long as the average temperature stays at an acceptable range. They can even maintain a hypothermic or torpid state at night to save their own energy reserves but keep the egg somewhat stable. Hummingbirds have the highest amount of feathers per surface area which allows them exceptional insulation that is no doubt useful during this taxing incubation that tends to last 15–22 days depending on species. Nestling period is shown to last between 18–26 days for hummingbirds.
Relevant research in general bird reproductive trends has shown that Southern Hemisphere birds on average show smaller clutches when compared to Northern situated Avian populations, there is much speculation behind why this is the case but there is no agreed upon current theory as of yet.
P. gigas migrates in summer to the temperate areas of South America reaching as low as 44 degrees South. Correspondingly they migrate North to more tropical climates in winter (March–August), though not usually venturing higher than 28 degrees South.
P. gigas holds significant value for some of the aboriginal inhabitants of the Andes. The people of Chiloé Island believe that if a woman captures a Hummingbird then they will gain great fertility from it. This is also the species that the people of Mapuche territory of Chile were inspired by to create the Nazca hummingbird geoglyph.
Popular culture appearances
Tim Low mentions P. gigas in his recent popular history of Australian birds ‘Where Song Began’, it was shown as an example of inconsistency to a theory that stated larger and more aggressive nectarivorous birds evolve in areas with poor soil, however Low felt that being only 24g at maximum it was comparatively small on a worldwide nectar eating bird scale.
- BirdLife International (2012). "Patagona gigas". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. International Union for Conservation of Nature. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
- Lasiewski, Robert C.; Weathers, Wesley W.; Bernstein, Marvin H. (December 1967). "Physiological responses of the giant hummingbird, Patagona gigas". Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 23 (3): 797–813. doi:10.1016/0010-406X(67)90342-8.
- San Diego Zoo's Animal Bytes: Hummingbird
- Fjeldsa, Jon; Krabbe, Niels (1990). Birds of the High Andes. Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. p. 876.
- Fernández, María José; Dudley, Robert; Bozinovic, Francisco (May 2011). "Comparative Energetics of the Giant Hummingbird". Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 84 (3): 333–340. doi:10.1086/660084. PMID 21527824.
- Healy, Susan; Hurly, T. Andrew (June 2006). "Hummingbirds". Current Biology 16 (11): R392–R393. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.015.
- Clark, Christopher J. (January 2010). "The Evolution of Tail Shape in Hummingbirds". The Auk 127 (1): 44–56. doi:10.1525/auk.2009.09073.
- Osés, C. S. (August 2003). Taxonomy, Phylogeny, and Biogeography of the Andean Hummingbird Genera Coeligena LESSON, 1832; Pterophanes GOULD, 1849; Ensifera LESSON 1843; and Patagona GRAY, 1840 (Aves: Trochiliformes) (1 ed.). Bonn, Germany: Bonn University. Retrieved 18 April 2015.
- Von Wehrden, H. (2008). "The Giant Hummingbird (Patagona gigas) in the Mountains of Central Argentina and a Climatic Envelope Model for its Distribution.". Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120 (3): 648–651. doi:10.1676/07-111.1.
- Oritz-Crespo, F. I. (1972). "A New Method to Separate Immature and Adult Hummingbirds". The Auk 89 (4): 851–857. doi:10.2307/4084114.
- Templin, R.J. (August 2000). "The spectrum of animal flight: insects to pterosaurs". Progress in Aerospace Sciences 36 (5-6): 393–436. doi:10.1016/S0376-0421(00)00007-5.
- Ricardo, R. (2010). Multi-ethnic Bird Guide of the Subantarctic Forests of South America (2 ed.). University of North Texas Press. pp. 171–173.
- McGuire, J. A.; Witt, Christopher C.; Altshuler, Douglas L.; Remsen Jr, J. V. (2007). "Phylogenetic Systematics and Biogeography of Hummingbirds: Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood Analyses of Partitioned Data and Selection of an Appropriate Partitioning Strategy". Systematic Biology 56 (5): 837–856. doi:10.2307/20143090.
- McGuire, Jimmy A.; Witt, Christopher C.; Remsen, J. V.; Dudley, R.; Altshuler, Douglas L. (5 August 2008). "A higher-level taxonomy for hummingbirds". Journal of Ornithology 150 (1): 155–165. doi:10.1007/s10336-008-0330-x.
- Gill, F; Donsker, D. "IOC World Bird List. 5.1". WorldBirdNames.org. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
- Herzog, Sebastian K.; Rodrigo, Soria A.; Matthysen, Erik (2003). "SEASONAL VARIATION IN AVIAN COMMUNITY COMPOSITION IN A HIGH-ANDEAN POLYLEPIS (ROSACEAE) FOREST FRAGMENT". The Wilson Bulletin 115 (4): 438–447. doi:10.1676/03-048.
- Villegas, Mariana; Garitano-Zavala, Álvaro (21 April 2010). "Bird community responses to different urban conditions in La Paz, Bolivia". Urban Ecosystems 13 (3): 375–391. doi:10.1007/s11252-010-0126-7.
- SCHLUMPBERGER, BORIS O.; BADANO, ERNESTO I. (December 2005). "DIVERSITY OF FLORAL VISITORS TO ECHINOPSIS ATACAMENSIS SUBSP. PASACANA (CACTACEAE)". Haseltonia 11: 18–26. doi:10.2985/1070-0048(2005)11[18:DOFVTE]2.0.CO;2.
- Hainsworth, F. R.; Wolf, L. L. (1972). "Power for Hovering Flight in Relation to Body Size in Hummingbirds". The American Naturalist 106 (951): 589–596. doi:10.2307/2459722.
- Altshuler, D. L.; Dudley, R. (2006). "The Physiology and Biomechanics of Avian Flight at High Altitude". Integrative and Comparative Biology 46 (1): 62–71. doi:10.2307/3884977.
- Zusi, Richard L. (September 2013). "Introduction to the Skeleton of Hummingbirds (Aves: Apodiformes, Trochilidae) in Functional and Phylogenetic Contexts". Ornithological Monographs 77 (1): 1–94. doi:10.1525/om.2013.77.1.1.
- Welch, Kenneth C.; Altshuler, Douglas L. (April 2009). "Fiber type homogeneity of the flight musculature in small birds". Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 152 (4): 324–331. doi:10.1016/j.cbpb.2008.12.013.
- Warrick, Douglas; Hedrick, Tyson; Fernández, María José; Tobalske, Bret; Biewener, Andrew (June 2012). "Hummingbird flight". Current Biology 22 (12): R472–R477. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.057.
- Welch, Kenneth C.; Chen, Chris C. W. (17 July 2014). "Sugar flux through the flight muscles of hovering vertebrate nectarivores: a review". Journal of Comparative Physiology B 184 (8): 945–959. doi:10.1007/s00360-014-0843-y.
- McKechnie, A. E.; Lovegrove, B. G. (2002). "Avian facultative hypothermic responses: A review". The Condor 104 (4): 705–724. doi:10.1650/0010-5422(2002)104[0705:afhrar]2.0.co;2.
- Gregory, T. R.; Andrews, C. B.; McGuire, J. A.; Witt, C. C. (5 August 2009). "The smallest avian genomes are found in hummingbirds". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276 (1674): 3753–3757. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1004.
- Estades, C. F.; Vukasovic, M. A.; Tomasevic, J. A. (2008). "Giant Hummingbirds (Patagona gigas) Ingest Calcium-rich Minerals". Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120 (3): 651–653. doi:10.1676/07-054.1.
- Montgomerie, R. D.; Redsell, C. A. (1980). "A Nesting Hummingbird Feeding Solely on Arthropods". The Condor 82 (4): 463–464. doi:10.2307/1367577.
- Smith, M.L.; Yanega, G.M.; Ruina, A. (August 2011). "Elastic instability model of rapid beak closure in hummingbirds". Journal of Theoretical Biology 282 (1): 41–51. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.05.007.
- Yanega, G. M.; Rubega, M. A. (2004). "Hummingbird jaw bends to aid insect capture". Nature 428 (6983): 615. doi:10.1038/428615a.
- González-Gómez, P. L.; Valdivia, C. E. (2005). "Direct and Indirect Effects of Nectar Robbing on the Pollinating Behavior of Patagona gigas (Trochilidae)". Biotropica 37 (4): 693–696. doi:10.2307/30043238.
- Larrea-Alcázar, Daniel M.; López, Ramiro P. (7 July 2011). "Pollination biology of Oreocereus celsianus (Cactaceae), a columnar cactus inhabiting the high subtropical Andes". Plant Systematics and Evolution 295 (1-4): 129–137. doi:10.1007/s00606-011-0485-4.
- Wester, P.; Claßen-Bockhoff, R. (30 January 2006). "Hummingbird pollination in Salvia haenkei (Lamiaceae) lacking the typical lever mechanism". Plant Systematics and Evolution 257 (3-4): 133–146. doi:10.1007/s00606-005-0366-9.
- Grant, K. A. (1966). "A Hypothesis Concerning the Prevalence of Red Coloration in California Hummingbird Flowers". The American Naturalist 100 (911): 85–97. doi:10.2307/2459422.
- Vleck, C. M. (1981). "Hummingbird Incubation: Female Attentiveness and Egg Temperature". Oecologia 51 (2): 199–205. doi:10.2307/4216520.
- Fierro-Calderón, K.; Martin, T. E. (2007). "REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE VIOLET-CHESTED HUMMINGBIRD IN VENEZUELA AND COMPARISONS WITH OTHER TROPICAL AND TEMPERATE HUMMINGBIRDS". The Condor 109 (3): 680–685. doi:10.1650/8305.1.
- Martin, T. E.; Martin, P. R.; Olson, C. R.; Heidinger, B. J.; Fontaine, J. J. (2000). "Parental care and clutch sizes in North and South American birds". Science 287 (5457): 1482–1485. doi:10.1126/science.287.5457.1482.
- Low, T. (2014). Where the Big Birds Are Where Song Began: Australia's birds and how they changed the world (pp. 21-25). Australia: Penguin Group Australia.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Patagona gigas.|
- Giant Hummingbird videos on the Internet Bird Collection
- BirdLife Species Factsheet
- - photographs of this and other hummingbird species
- Giant Hummingbird photo gallery VIREO