Gibson's Bakery v. Oberlin College

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Gibson's Bakery v. Oberlin College
CourtOhio Courts of Common Pleas
Full case nameGibson Bros. Inc. v. Oberlin College
DecidedJune 2019
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingJudge John Miraldi
Keywords
Libel, Slander, Tortious interference

Gibson's Bakery v. Oberlin College is an Ohio legal case concerning libel, tortious interference and infliction of distress. The case began with an incident of shoplifting by an Oberlin College student at Gibson's Bakery, a local store. Following the arrests of three students related to the shoplifting incident, some students, faculty members and employees of Oberlin College protested against the bakery, alleging racism. The case ultimately involved questions about the responsibilities of universities during student protests. In 2019, a jury found that Oberlin College had defamed the owner of Gibson's Bakery and his family, and awarded them millions of dollars in damages. The school has appealed but the court required it to post a bond while the appeals process continues.

Background[edit]

Gibson's Bakery is a fifth-generation family business, established in Oberlin, Ohio, in 1885.[1][2] Half of the city's 8,000 residents are students (3,000) or employees (1,000) of Oberlin College.[3] Local merchants are reportedly frequent targets of shoplifting by students of the school.[4][5] The school's newspaper has published an article describing shoplifting as a rite of passage among Oberlin students.[4] According to police records, between 2011 and 2016 there were four robberies at Gibson's Bakery and 40 adults were arrested for shoplifting, 33 of whom were college students.[5][6] According to Gibson's, the bakery loses thousands of dollars to shoplifters every year.[6] The owner of a nearby Ben Franklin store reported losing more than $10,000 a year to shoplifters.[3]

2016 shoplifting incident[edit]

On Wednesday, November 9, 2016, an underage African-American Oberlin College student, Jonathan Aladin, attempted to purchase a bottle of wine using a fake identification card.[6] The store clerk, Allyn D. Gibson, a son and grandson of the owners,[4] rejected the fake ID. Gibson noticed that the student was concealing two other bottles of wine inside his jacket.[7][4] According to a police report, Gibson told the student he was contacting the police, and when Gibson pulled out his phone to take a photo of the student, the student slapped it away, striking Gibson's face.[8] The student ran out of the store. Gibson followed and tackled him in the street.[4] Two other students, friends of the shoplifter, joined the scuffle.[4] When the police arrived, they witnessed Gibson lying on the ground with the three students punching and kicking him.[8] The police report stated that Gibson sustained a swollen lip, several cuts, and other minor injuries.[5][9] The police arrested the students, charging all three with assault and the shoplifter with robbery as well. In August 2017, the three students pleaded guilty, stating that they believed Gibson's actions were justified and were not racially motivated.[8][10][11] Their plea deals carried no jail time in exchange for restitution, the public statement and a promise of future good behaviour.[10][12]

Response[edit]

The day after the incident, faculty and hundreds of students gathered in a park across the street from Gibson's Bakery protesting what they saw as racial profiling and excessive use of force by Gibson toward the shoplifter.[4] The Oberlin Student Senate immediately passed a resolution saying that the bakery "has a history of racial profiling and discriminatory treatment of students and residents alike," calling for all students to "immediately cease all support, financial and otherwise, of Gibson's" and called upon Oberlin College President Marvin Krislov to publicly condemn the bakery.[13]

For about two months, the college suspended its purchasing agreement with the bakery for the school's dining halls, in what it said was an attempt to de-escalate the protests.[4]

Oberlin blamed the bakery for bringing the protests on itself, claiming that "Gibson bakery's archaic chase-and-detain policy regarding suspected shoplifters was the catalyst for the protests ... The guilt or innocence of the students is irrelevant to both the root cause of the protests and this litigation."[4]

During a meeting with Gibson's, Oberlin stated it would consider reinstating the business relationship if the bakery agreed to not bring criminal charges against first-time shoplifters. According to the civil complaint filed by the bakery, Gibson's was worried such a policy would cause an increase in future shoplifting.[6] Oberlin made a proposal to all local businesses that if a business would contact the college instead of the police when students were caught shoplifting, the college would advise the students that if caught shoplifting a second time they would face legal charges.[3]

Some observers viewed the Oberlin protests as a reaction to the election of Donald Trump as President.[3] In the opinion of attorney William A. Jacobson, who followed the case closely, "On a different campus on a different day, it is unlikely a simple shoplifting case would have gained much attention."[1] In September 2018, Oberlin student Sophie Jones wrote an opinion column in a student publication reminiscing about the 2016 protests, "The 2016 presidential election was fresh; the violence at Gibson’s, to me, felt like another, more personal reminder that white complacency like my own was a delusion, a two way mirror behind which systemic racism operated unhindered..." Longtime African-American Oberlin resident Eric Gaines testified, "The election occurred the night before... People were anxious and it was like a time bomb ready to explode." In a November 2016 letter to faculty and students, Oberlin College President Marvin Krislov said, "This has been a difficult few days for our community, not simply because of the events at Gibson's Bakery, but because of the fears and concerns that many are feeling in response to the outcome of the presidential election."[3]

A former administrator said that Oberlin's recent drop in enrollment caused the school to be wary of disagreeing with its students. "A freshman from an East Coast big city might come to Oberlin and find there is little for a social justice warrior to do in a small town like this, so they get frustrated and make issues like this shoplifting thing bigger than it should be, and the school follows along."[3]

Retired Oberlin professor Roger Copeland was also critical of the protests, writing a year after the protests began, "It’s embarrassing when one has to ask Oberlin students the same question one asks climate-change deniers: At what point do you accept the empirical evidence, even if that means having to embrace an “inconvenient” truth? ... The time has come for the Dean of Students Meredith Raimondo, on behalf of the College, to apologize to the Gibson family...."[6] Dean Raimondo reacted to Professor Copeland's statement in a private text message, "Fuck him. I'd say unleash the students if I wasn't convinced this needs to be put behind us."[6] To Conor Friedersdorf, a writer for The Atlantic known for his civil libertarian perspectives, college administrators at Oberlin "calculatingly wield some control over whether students activists are aggressive or restrained."[6]

An email from Vice President of Communications Ben Jones read, "All these idiots complaining about the college hurting a 'small local business' are conveniently leaving out their massive (relative to the town) conglomerate and price gouging on rents and parking and the predatory behavior toward most other local business. Fuck 'em."[14]

Lawsuit and trial[edit]

In November 2017, Gibson's Bakery filed a civil complaint against Oberlin for libel, slander, interference with business relationships, and interference with contracts in the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas. Gibson's argued the college supported the protests that damaged its reputation and that the college unlawfully broke its contract with the bakery.[8] In the complaint, the Gibson family alleged that some Oberlin College professors attended the demonstrations, joined in the chants with a bullhorn, and gave course credit to students who skipped class to attend the demonstrations. It also claimed Oberlin employees distributed boycott flyers and allowed them to be photocopied for free on school machines.[6] Oberlin's dean of students, Meredith Raimondo, as well as other college officials joined the protestors, bringing them pizza, authorizing the purchase of winter gloves for students protesting in cold weather, and helping pass out flyers urging passersby to boycott Gibson's.[4] Jason Hawk, a reporter and editor with the Oberlin News-Tribune testified that Dean Raimondo blocked him repeatedly from photographing the protest, telling him that he did not have a right to photograph the student protestors and handed him a flyer that read "This is a RACIST establishment with a LONG ACCOUNT of RACIAL PROFILING and DISCRIMINATION."[3][15][16]

Local police records showed no previous accusations of racial profiling by Gibson's Bakery.[4] Of the forty adults arrested for shoplifting from the bakery in a five-year period, only six were black.[17] As a part of the three students' guilty plea in August 2017, each read a statement saying, "I believe the employees of Gibson’s actions were not racially motivated. They were merely trying to prevent an underage sale." Reporters obtained an email written by Emily Crawford, an employee for the school's communications department, telling her bosses that she found the protests "very disturbing," saying, "I have talked to 15 townie friends who are [persons of color] and they're disgusted and embarrassed by the protest. In their view, the kid was breaking the law, period... To them this is not a race issue at all."[6] During the trial, witness Eddie Holoway, a black man who worked his way through technical college while working at Gibson’s Bakery, said that the racist allegations against his former employer were untrue. "In my life, I have been a marginalized person, so I know what it feels like to be called something that you know you’re not. I could feel his pain. I knew where he was coming from."[6] Clarence 'Trey' James, a black man employed at Gibson's since 2013, testified that he had observed no racist treatment of customers or employees. "Never, not even a hint. Zero reason to believe, zero evidence of that."[18] Trey also told the student-run Oberlin Review, "When you steal from the store, it doesn't matter what color you are. You can be purple, blue, green; if you steal, you get caught, you get arrested."[13]

During the trial, the defense said that the lawsuit was an attempt by the bakery to "profit from a divisive and polarizing event..."[3] Oberlin argued that purchasing food and gloves for protesters was not an endorsement of the protests. They also argued that the two-month suspension of Gibson's dining hall agreement was an attempt to de-escalate the protests, but Gibson's replied that students interpreted the decision as the school taking the side against the bakery, inflaming the protests instead.[4] Oberlin also tried to argue that any statements that may have been made about the Gibsons being racist or having a history of racial profiling are opinions and cannot be libelous.[14]

Verdict[edit]

In June 2019 the jury found in favor of the Gibson family, awarding $43 million in damages.[19]

Oberlin released a statement disagreeing with the outcome, asserting they not only did not defame the bakery, but also attempted to repair the damage caused by the protests. "Colleges cannot be held liable for the independent actions of their students. Institutions of higher education are obligated to protect freedom of speech on their campuses and respect their students' decision to peacefully exercise their First Amendment rights."[6] Attorney Lee Plakas representing the Gibson family in the trial responded "The recent efforts of Oberlin College and President Ambar to reframe this as a First Amendment issue, while undermining the jury's decision, should be incredibly concerning to us all. Oberlin College was never on trial for the free speech of its students. Instead, the jury unanimously determined that Oberlin College libeled the Gibsons." Oberlin College president Carmen Twillie Ambar told CBSN, "The jury found those statements in the flyer, and in the Senate Resolution, were statements that they thought were libelous. What we've been saying is we didn't write those statements... The college didn't construct the flyer, the college didn't condone the flyer, it didn't write the Student Senate resolution... There was one administrator there who was representing the institution, and the student handbook requires her to be there... There may have been some professors who were there operating in their own individual capacity, but they weren't representing the institution."[20]

In the official statement released by Oberlin, the school also said it regrets "that the jury did not agree with the clear evidence our team presented," a response that Legal Insurrection, a conservative law blog, said was "baffling because the trial is not over. The jury will hear more evidence and render a verdict on punitive damages... The post-verdict email could be Exhibit A at the punitive damages hearing as to why the compensatory damages are not sufficient to send a message to Oberlin College."[21]

The jury later awarded the plaintiffs $33 million in punitive damages, for a total award of $44 million. At the end of the month, Judge John Miraldi reduced the total award to $25 million because state law limits punitive damages.[22] In July 2019, the court ordered Oberlin to pay an additional $6.5 million as reimbursement for Gibson's attorney fees and other legal expenses.[23]

Appeals[edit]

On October 8, 2019, the college filed a Notice of Appeal appealing the case to the Ninth District Court of Appeals in Akron, Ohio.[24] Days later, Gibson's Bakery filed their own Notice of Appeal asking for review of Ohio's statutory caps on monetary damages, rulings made by Judge Miraldi on motions, and the exclusion of expert witness testimony in the trial.[25] Oberlin College filed their principal appeals brief June 5, 2020.[26] Oral arguments by the parties were made in the Ohio Ninth District Court of Appeals, November 11, 2020, and made public on YouTube. [27]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Jacobson, William (11 January 2019). "Oberlin Pays for Smearing the Town Grocer The college alleged student shoplifters were victims of racial profiling, but a jury wasn't buying it". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 18 June 2019.
  2. ^ Richardson, Valerie (13 June 2019). "Ohio jury dings Oberlin College for $33 million in punitive damages over anti-bakery protests Jury previously awarded $11 million in compensatory damages". Washington Times. Retrieved 18 June 2019.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h McGraw, Daniel (17 October 2018). "Why Can't Oberlin Fix a Lingering Town vs. Gown Battle?". Weekly Standard. Retrieved 18 June 2019.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Hartocollis, Anemona (14 June 2019). "Oberlin Helped Students Defame a Bakery, a Jury Says. The Punishment: $33 Million". New York Times. Retrieved 17 June 2019. It blamed the store for bringing its problems on itself. "Gibson bakery's archaic chase-and-detain policy regarding suspected shoplifters was the catalyst for the protests," the college said. "The guilt or innocence of the students is irrelevant to both the root cause of the protests and this litigation."
  5. ^ a b c Malkin, Michelle (18 December 2016). "Baking up racism at Oberlin College". The Sun (Lowell).
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Friedersdorf, Conor (15 June 2019). "From Public Shame to the Courtroom". The Atlantic. Retrieved 17 June 2019.
  7. ^ Tarlo, Shira (14 June 2019). "Here's what you need to know about the bizarre lawsuit between Oberlin College and a local bakery". Salon. Archived from the original on 14 June 2019. Retrieved 15 June 2019.
  8. ^ a b c d Stanley-Becker, Isaac (10 June 2019). "Protests at Oberlin labeled a bakery racist. Now, the college has been ordered to pay $11 million for libel". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 13, 2019. Retrieved 19 June 2019.
  9. ^ Ellis, Marc A. (9 September 2016). "Incident Number 16-00621" (PDF). Oberlin Police Department – via Legal Insurrection.
  10. ^ a b Friedersdorf, Conor (15 June 2019). "From Public Shame to the Courtroom". The Atlantic.
  11. ^ Hazelrigg, Nick (10 June 2019). "Oberlin ordered to pay bakery $11 million over protests". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 12 October 2020.
  12. ^ Patel, Vimal (25 October 2019). "The Rift: How 2 cheap bottles of wine tore a college and its community apart". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 12 October 2020.
  13. ^ a b Jacobson, William A. (13 November 2016). "Bakery targeted by Oberlin College #BlackLivesMatter fights back". Legal Insurrection. Retrieved 18 June 2019.
  14. ^ a b Gerstmann, Evan (12 Jun 2019). "The $11 Million Libel Verdict Against Oberlin College Is A Threat To Colleges Nationwide". Forbes. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  15. ^ Schow, Ashe (17 June 2019). "WORSE THAN YOU THINK: There's More To The Oberlin Story Than Previously Reported". Daily Wire. Retrieved 18 June 2019.
  16. ^ "Racism dispute at bakery roils in Oberlin, Ohio". CBS News. 10 December 2017. Retrieved 18 June 2019.
  17. ^ Dickson, E.J. (July 18, 2019). "How a Small-Town Bakery in Ohio Became a Lightning Rod in the Culture Wars". Rolling Stone.
  18. ^ Collins, Sean (18 July 2019). "Oberlin and the price of wokeness". Spiked. Retrieved 18 June 2019.
  19. ^ Jacobson, William A. (7 June 2019). "VERDICT: Jury awards Gibson's Bakery $11 million against Oberlin College". Legal Insurrection. Retrieved 18 June 2019.
  20. ^ Pascus, Brian (27 June 2019). "Oberlin College president Carmen Twillie Ambar on the $44 million ruling against the school". CBS News. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  21. ^ Jacobson, William A. (9 June 2019). "Oberlin College mass email criticizing Jurors could influence Punitive Damages Hearing in Gibson's Bakery case". Legal Insurrection. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  22. ^ "Judge reduces jury awards in Gibson's Bakery dispute with Oberlin College". WKYC. Associated Press. June 28, 2019. Retrieved May 20, 2020.
  23. ^ Jacobson, William A. (July 17, 2019). "Gibson's Bakery awarded over $6.5 million in attorney's fees and expenses against Oberlin College". Legal Insurrection. Retrieved July 22, 2019.
  24. ^ "Oberlin Appeals Verdict that Sets Troubling Free Speech Precedent". Oberlin College. 8 October 2019. Retrieved 8 October 2019.
  25. ^ O’Brien, Dave (October 22, 2019). "Gibsons file notice of appeal in case against Oberlin College". The Chronicle-Telegram. Retrieved May 20, 2020.
  26. ^ Jacob, Bob (June 5, 2020). "Oberlin College files principal brief appealing Gibson's Bakery judgment." Cleveland Jewish News. Retrieved June 25, 2020.
  27. ^ "Gibson Bros., Inc., et al. v. Oberlin College, et al., Lorain App.No. 19CA011563 / 20CA011632". November 11, 2020.