Giuliano Mignini

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Public Minister
Giuliano Mignini
Born 1950
Education Law degree
Alma mater University of Perugia
Occupation Public prosecutor
Years active Magistrate since 1979
Known for Monster of Florence
Murder of Meredith Kercher
Children Four daughters[1]

Giuliano Mignini (born 1950)[2] is an Italian magistrate. He currently works as public prosecutor in Perugia, Umbria.

He is known for his involvement as the prosecutor in the investigation of the death of Dr. Francesco Narducci, who was found dead in the Trasimeno lake in 1985. Mignini opened an investigation into his death as a cold case in October 2001, based on evidence that had emerged during another investigation on a phone stalking case and following a request by Narducci's widow. One month later, the Public Prosecution of Florence revealed that they were also investigating on Narducci's death, as they believed he was involved the Monster of Florence serial murders case. Florence requested to merge their investigation with the one carried on by the Perugia office. The investigation resulted in the prosecution of a number of individuals over the following years, on allegations indirectly connected to Narducci's death such as cover-up and side-tracking charges. Most charges were later dropped due to the expiration of limitation statute terms. Courts determined that Narducci had died by strangling and not by drowning as previously declared, while the alleged side-trackings subsequent to his death did take place, including the staging of the corpse finding at the lake by using the body of an unknown.[3]

Mignini came to wider public attention as the prosecutor who led the 2007 investigation into the murder of Meredith Kercher, and the subsequent prosecution of Rudy Guede, Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito. The conviction of Knox and Sollecito was eventually annulled by the Supreme Court of Cassation On March 27, 2015. The conviction of Knox and Sollecito was eventually annulled by the Supreme Court of Cassation invokeing the provision of art. 530 § 2. of Italian Procedure Code ("reasonable doubt") and ordered that no further trial should be held, which resulted in their acquittal, in March 2015.[4] The verdict pointed out that as scientific evidence was "central" to the case, there were "glaring defalliances" or "amnesia" and "culpable omissions of investigation activities".

The Court, however, acknowledged that it is a "proven fact" that Knox was at the murder scene when the murder was committed[5][6][7][8]while instead it was not proven "beyond reasonable doubt" that Knox and Sollecito had an "active participation" to the "killing action",[6][9] and so invoked the legal categories of "non punishable connivence" or "concurring in the crime committed by others";[10] the sentence also acknowledges as "incontrovertible" the fact that Kercher was killed by more than one person and that Guede concurred in committing the murder "together with others".[11][12]

Education and career[edit]

Mignini was born in 1950 in Perugia, the son of a high-school teacher belonging to a family of sculptors. He obtained his law degree from the University of Perugia. He had wished to pursuse a career in the Air Force, but he was rejected by the Pilots Academy because of a form of daltonism.[13] He passed the magistrate's examination in 1979, and worked for one year in Volterra serving as pretore (an investigating judge role which does not exist anymore in the Italian system). He served for several years as judge in the courts of Pisa and Terni, where he worked on different times both as a criminal and as a civil judge. In 1989 he returned to Perugia and served as investigator and criminal prosecutor (sostituto procuratore), between 2004 and 2012 he also had powers as the head of anti-mafia prosecutors (Direzione Distrettuale Antimafia) in Umbria,[14] in 2013 he took a post at the Appeals prosecution office (Procura Generale).[15][16]

Notable cases[edit]

The Narducci case[edit]

The investigation on the death of Perugian doctor Francesco Narducci (1949-1985) was a case that lasted overall about ten years, between 2000 and 2010. It is one of the investigations connected to the principal investigation on the serial murders known as "The Monster of Florence" case.[17] The Narducci case extended into satellite investigations about activities at subsequent times by multiple individuals, aimed at covering up the circumstances of death or derailing the investigation.

The Monster of Florence cases[edit]

A series of 8 double murders that took place around Florence, Italy, between 1968 and 1985 were known as the Monster of Florence murders. At different points in time, different people were tried and convicted for the crimes. A Sardinian man named Stefano Mele had confessed to the 1968 crime and was convicted, but was released many years later, as judges suspected his confession was unreliable. In 1981 a man named Enzo Spalletti was arrested and suspected of one the crimes, he subsequently turned out to be just a voyeurist who used to spy on young couples, and was released months later, albeit he is thought to have witnessed some of the crimes. In 1982 Francesco Vinci, a man native from Sardinia, who had been already connected to the 1968 murder, was suspected of the crimes and arrested under cautionary custody provisions, then released in 1983. Pietro Pacciani was arrested in 1993 and suspected of being the killer of all the murders except the 1968 one, he was found guilty and convicted in 1994, then was acquitted on appeal in 1996 on reasonable doubt instances; the Supreme Court subsequently annulled the acquittal and re-entered evidence that had been previously ruled out on procedural grounds, pointing out that the previous preliminary exclusion of part of the evidence was unlawful. Pacciani was sent to trial again, but he died in 1998 in unclear circumstances only a few days before the scheduled beginning of the second appeals trial. In the meanwhile, prosecutors had extended their scenario and accused further two suspects, Mario Vanni and Luca Lotti, of alleged complicity in Pacciani's murders. Both Vanni and Lotti were tried and were definitively found guilty in 2000. The courts pointed out that, however, the findigns were still incomplete, as they thought there was evidence that "other subjects" were also involved in the murders. In 2005 the Florence Prosecution office investigated pharmacist Francesco Calamandrei alleging his involvement in the cases. Calamandrei was indicted of complicity in the murders in 2007, tried and acquitted in 2008.

Early suspicions on Narducci[edit]

Dr. Francesco Narducci's body was recovered from Lake Trasimeno near Perugia, Umbria, in 1985 and was initially determined to be a drowning.[18][19] His body was discovered a month after the final double-murder linked to the Monster of Florence. The name of Dr. Narducci belonged to a list of "persons of interest" issued by the Florence Police in relation to the Monster of Florence cases since 1987.[20] Police and prosecutors in Florence initially investigated Narducci's death as connected to the murders after a number of anonymous letters were received, but police were unable to find evidence of a connection.[21][22] According to journalist P. Licciardi, police departments carried on "parallel" and irregular investigations on Narducci since September 10. 1985 in Florence, while a Carabinieri high officer in Perugia ordered the search of Narducci's apartment, without informing superior authorities.[23] The same day, a male nurse at a Florence hospital found a bullet, identical to the ones used in the murders, lying on the floor in the hospital parking before a garage entrance, with its ogive pointing in direction of the hospital's entrance. The police searched the hospital, including doctors' wardrobes.[24][25] A speculation that a doctor might be involved in the murders already circulated among investigators, since experts ponted out that some of the excissions of body parts from the female victims' bodies apparently had almost a surgical quality (a pathologist testifying about one body said it looked as if the perpetrator "could perform mastectomies").[26]

Perugian investigation into Narducci's death[edit]

In the summer of 2001 in Foligno, as the police was investigating an ongoing phone stalking case, some of the conversations they recorded included suggestions that Narducci's had been killed. Two individuals (one man and one woman) threatened a woman that if she did not pay what was owed she would end up like "the doctor killed at the lake", and also mentioning links between Narducci and the suspects of the Monster of Florence cases.[21][22] Subsequent threatening phone calls to the same woman also referred to the "murder of Pacciani" (one of the suspects in the Monster of Florence case who was found dead in suspicious circumstances[27]) and said that both had been killed by members of a secret society for betraying them.[28] Foligno is under the jurisdiction of Perugia prosecuting office. As a matter of routine management inside the office, the investigation file had been handed over by prosecutor Silvia Della Monica, who had started it, to Mignini. The stalkers appeared to know details about the deaths Pacciani and Narducci which were not available to the public.[29] A man was charged of the phone threats case, he pleaded guilty and was sentenced, ending the case (despite the fact that the voice of at least another woman was recorded among the phone stalkers). Mignini meanwhile became interested directly in the issue of Narducci's death, which they were talking about in the phone calls.

At first Mignini wanted to verify whether there could be a link between Narducci and the woman victim of the phone threats. Based on the content of the phone transcripts, and after hearing other witnesses, Mignini opened an investigation file on suspicion that Narducci might have been murdered[30] and found that the officially stated cause of death was actually unproven, since no autopsy and no body examination was performed at the time, despite that should have been mandatory by law.[31] Mignini suspected that the body finding at the lake was a staging, aimed at covering up the real cause of Narducci's death. The trigger of the investigation was the failure to perform autopsy and not allowing the photographing of the body at the time, despite a massive and anomalous presence of authorities that included even the head of police.[32] A few days after the opening of the investigation, on November 9. 2001, Florence prosecutor Paolo Canessa requested Mignini to merge his file with his own investigation on Narducci, explaining that the doctor's death was in connection with the 'Monster of Florence' case, on which Canessa had opened a new investigation branch.

In March 2002 Mignini requested an experts' opinion to pathologist prof. Giovanni Pierucci about the pictures of the body that were taken on the pier in 1985, Pierucci's report pointed out that medical investigation done at the time was "completely lacking", while assessed the decay of the cadaver in the photo appeared too advanced to be consistent with only five days in water, and recommended the unburial and examination of the body.[33] In late summer 2002 Mignini, assisted by the Florence prosecutors, had Narducci's body exhumed and examined. The original scope of the investigation was to find out the cause of Narducci's death, also prompted by a request by Narducci's widow Francesca Spagnoli, since no autopsy had been performed at the time and no evidence existed to corroborate the stating of drawning as cause of death. Mignini and police at the time were taking for granted that Narducci's body and the one found at the lake were the same person. The pathologist found evidence that the cause of death was not drawning but strangulation. But also, Prof. Pierucci concluded that the body could not be the same body found at the pier. Narducci's body was not decomposed enough to be the body found in water at the time. Also, Narducci's body had hair, while the body photographed at the lake had not. Further expert reports determined that the body on the pier was also shorter than Narducci and had a waist size not compatible with the trousers on the exhumed corpse. Below Narducci's body, buttoned into his trousers, there was also a linen canvas with apparent exoteric symbols. Analysis also revealed that Dr. Narducci was intoxicated with meperidine, an opioid. Mignini believed to have sufficient evidence that the whole finding of the body at the lake had been a staging, performed as part of a cover-up by state authorities, coordinated by the Provincial head of Police (Questore) at the time, Francesco Trio.[34][21] Mignini alleged that Narducci had been involved in a secret society and killed to keep quiet and that his father, Ugo Narducci, a member of a masonic lodge, had masterminded the cover up.[35][36] Mignini's theory involved a complicated conspiracy of 20 people, including government officials and law enforcement officers. Mignini indicted 20 people and charged them with the concealment of Narducci's murder. The prosecution dragged on for several years due to conflicting rulings and delays by courts.[37] Narducci's family and colleagues believe that his death was a suicide.[35]

Arrest of journalist Mario Spezi[edit]

Florence detectives tapped phones belonging to several individuals related to the Narducci side-trackings case suspects, including journalist Mario Spezi. From some phone conversations - some of which between Spezi and American author Douglas Preston - it appeared that Spezi and others were preparing thmselves to do "something worrying", while it could not be understood exactly what the plot was about.[38] On February 23. 2006, Mignini summoned Douglas Preston for questioning as a person informed about facts related to Spezi's activities. Mignini made Preston listen to one of the phone recordings with his own voice. Mignini stopped the questioning as he suspected Preston of perjury, given a manifest contradiction between his answer and the content of the phone recordings.[39]

In April 2006 the Florence police arrested Italian journalist Mario Spezi together with mobster Luigi Ruocco and ex-Carabinieri officer Ferdinando Zaccaria while they were found trying enter the area of a private villa in a countryside location in Tuscany. The police, on Mignini's orders, had wiretapped their phone conversation as they appeared to be plotting to plant some evidence items related the Monster of Florence inside the villa.[40][41] Preliminary judge Marina De Roberti, on Mignini's request, ordered the men to be held in cautionary custody, and also formally suspected Spezi of complicity in the homicides of the Monster of Florence case. The request of custody was not motivated by the suspicion of murder, but based on the accusation of attempting to pollute the Narducci investigation. Spezi was held for 23 days, 4 without a lawyer.[42][43][44]

In an interview by "The Atlantic" in August 2006, Preston called Mignini "A sincere man and an honest and incorruptible judge", and said "I think he really believed that I was guilty and that Spezi was guilty. I could see that in the interrogation he believed I was a liar. So, yes, I think he was doing his job the best he could".[45]

Courts findings confirming Mignini's scenario[edit]

On 22 March 2013 the Third Circuit Court of Cassation (Supreme Court of Italy) ruled that the theory that Francesco Narducci's body was kept "hidden" for about a week was "correct" and that the alleged cover-ups around Narducci's death, including the hiding of his body for five days, in fact took place as in the scenario described by Mignini.[46][47] The Court of Cassation, annulling a previous ruling, sustained the validity of 17 of the 23 counts alleged by Mignini and sent them back for re-trial, but dropped the additional charge of "mafia association", therefore shortening the time terms for their legal prosecution. Other court rulings on related cases also stated that Mignini's theory was in fact correct.[3]

Allegations of abuse of office[edit]

In 2004, the Florence Public Prosecution office discontinued their cooperation with Perugia, and demanded that they alone have the whole investigation file on Narducci's death. Mignini refused to hand over the investigation, claiming that the Trasimeno Lake shore where the body was recovered was in the territory under the jurisdiction of his office. The Florence police also provided Mignini with a recorded wiretapping in which prosecutor Paolo Canessa justified the break up of Florence collaboration by explaining that the Chief Prosecutor of Florence, Ubaldo Nannucci, was "not a free man" and was acting on superior orders. Based on the recording of Canessa's voice, Mignini opened an investigation against Ubaldo Nannucci, and against the Chief of Police in Florence, Giuseppe De Donno, accusing both of them of voluntarily obstructing Police activity and of hindering the investigation on Narducci's death.

In 2006, a Florence prosecutor, Luca Turco, in return charged Mignini and the head of the Florence Mobile Squad, Michele Giuttari (the depertment which had provided Mignini with the recording) with a number of counts, including the alleged fabrication of a false audio recording, plus a number of counts of abuse of office for allegedly ordering the illegal wiretapping of the phones of various police officers and journalists involved in the Monster of Florence case. Some newspapers called the escalation a "prosecution office war".[48][43] Florence prosecution accused Mignini of carrying on a "parallel investigation" in order to cover up for Giuttari's alleged fabrication of a false recording of Canessa's conversation, and ordered a police raid of his office. Perugian newspapers alleged that in fact Florence ordered the raid in the Perugian office in order to put their hands on the Narducci - Monster of Florence file.[49]

The Florence Prosecution office accused Mignini of taking part in forging a fake audio recording, of abusing his powers as he investigated the head of Florentine police Giuseppe De Donno, and for having wiretapped phone calls of three journalists and two police officers, allegedly for unjustified reasons. Mignini objected that the Florence Magistrates had no jurisdiction on him because of their office's conflict of interest and requested that the investigation be moved to Turin. Preliminary judge Dania Mori turned down his request. In January 2010, a Florence court chaired by judge Francesco Maradei acquitted him of the first three counts of fabricating fake evidence, as Mignini and Giuttari managed do prove that the audio recording was authentic,[50] but found him guilty of the remaining four counts of exceeding the powers of his office.[15] He was given a 16-month suspended sentence. Mignini appealed the conviction, saying "My conscience is clear, I know I did nothing wrong." [51] He remained in office through the appeal process, as Italian law does not consider convictions final until all appeals are exhausted, but delayed taking a post at the Procura Generale where he had been already appointed.[52][53] According to Rome-based journalist and author Barbie Latza Nadeau, even if Mignini were convicted, offenses such as this are rarely grounds for removing a prosecutor from office.[54] In November 2011, a Court of Appeals accepted his preliminary objection and annulled the previous conviction, also declaring the prosecution by Florentine magistrates illegitimate - since some of the Florence prosecutors were also the offended parties - and sent the investigation file to a prosecutor in Turin.[55][56] The Prosecution General of Florence appealed against the decision at the Supreme Court, so factually blocking the transfer to Turin for at least another year. In February 2013 the Florence office lost their appeal and the Supreme Court ordered the investigation be moved to Turin. Mignini said "It took me 7 years to be right"[57] In 2016, the court of Turin dropped the remaining charges due to statutory terms expiration.

Finding of no wrongdoing[edit]

While the Italian justice system does not prosecute criminal allegations beyond statutory terms through penal courts, Italian Magistrates are still subjected to a judgement also by a disciplinary court of the High Council of the Judiciary (Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura, or CSM) which seeks to find out facts in the merits, even if the Magistrate has already been acquitted of criminal charges on technicalities, or when there is still reasonable doubt. Mignini underwent a lengthy trial by the CSM about the Florence allegations on Narducci case. In March 2017 the CSM disciplinary court acquitted Mignini of all allegations, finding that in his conduct "there was no wrongdoing".[58]

Murder of Meredith Kercher[edit]

Meredith Kercher was a young woman murdered in Perugia on 1 November 2007. Mignini was one of the two prosecutors who directed the investigation of the case.[59][60]

In October 2011, Mignini told a reporter from the British newspaper The Guardian "I have felt under attack ever since I investigated Narducci. It all started there." He further suggested that the trial for abuse of power was related to persecution for his role in the Monster of Florence case and blamed American author Douglas Preston, co-author with Spezi of a book about the case, of masterminding a U.S. press campaign against him over the Knox case. As part of his summing up in the first Knox appeal he said "our judicial system has been subjected to a systematic denigration by a well-organised operation of a journalistic and political nature".[61]

Preston has criticized the conduct of Mignini[62] in the trial. In April 2009, Preston appeared in a segment of 48 Hours on CBS, in which he argued that the case against Knox was "based on lies, superstition, and crazy conspiracy theories".[63] In December 2009, after the verdict had been announced, he appeared on Anderson Cooper 360° on CNN and described his own interrogation by Mignini in the same terms,[64]while shortly after hs interrogation, he had previously called Mignini "A sincere man and an honest and incorruptible judge".[65]

In 2013, Knox and Sollecito's case was committed to another prosecutor, Alessandro Crini, who requested and obtained the convictions in their retrial.[66] Knox and Sollecito were acquitted by the Supreme Court of Cassazione on 27 March 2015, ending the case,[4] even though the court stated that it is a "proven fact" that Knox was at the murder scene during the killing[5] and that Meredith Kercher was killed by multiple persons.[67]

Satellite prosecutions initiated by Mignini[edit]

In February 2013, Mignini launched a defamation suit against Raffaele Sollecito, for allegations in Sollecito's book, Honor Bound, including claims of secret negotiations between Mignini and Sollecito's family.[68]

Mignini censure[edit]

On December 4, 2015 Mignini was disciplined by the High Council of the Judiciary for violation of correct procedure in the arrest of Sollecito in November 2007. The Prosecutor General of the Supreme Court requested his acquittal. Mignini was defended by judge Piercamillo Davigo. The disciplinary panel stated that he issued an oral order of prohibiting legal counsel with Sollecito, instead of issueing a written order as provided by the law.[69] He was issued a censure.[70]

Brigitta Bulgari[edit]

In June 2010, Mignini was the prosecutor involved in the case of porn star Brigitta Bulgari who was arrested and held for 11 days after being charged with child pornography; this followed the surfacing of a mobile phone video showing 15-year-old boys touching her breasts while she performed as a stripper in an Umbria night club.[71][72][73] Sexual contact with minors itself may be not punishable under Italian law, but it is illegal to produce videos. Bulgari had her charges dropped in October 2011 based on a preliminary judge assumption that "Bulgari was not aware that there were minors in the club" and "because of intense lights she could not see whether people were filming". Bulgari stated that she was "just trying to make a living" and that she felt sorry for Amanda Knox, pointing out that they were both investigated by the same prosecutor.[72] She also said that she would seek monetary damages for "muddying her name" and planned to write a book about her experiences after arrest.[72]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Burleigh 2011, p. 155.
  2. ^ Burleigh 2011, pp. 153–154.
  3. ^ a b Milan Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit, Guerriero P., Caccialanza P. (27 October 2014). Sentence 7498/14, proceedings 3829/2014. Milan. p. 5,19. Since January 21th 2005 the Public Prosecutor of the Republic Mr. Giuliano Mignini presented the Preliminary Judge of Perugia with a request to proceed through an ‘’incidente probatorio’’ procedure at hearing the testimony of twenty one persons (because of the old age of some of them, because of the precarious health conditions of others, and because some other had been victims of threats), within proceedings n. 8970/2002 RGNR, pending against numerous individuals for an extremely large series of crimes (criminal association, cover-up of individual, vilipendium of cadaver, destruction, suppression or removal of cadaver, illegitimate use of cadaver, falsehood in public records also by inducing public officers to commit error, omission of official papers, threat in order to induce to commit a crime, threat against a public officer, revelation of secret documents also by instigation, obstructing justice by accusing an innocent, interruption of public service, suppression of various documents, abuse of office, usurpation of public functions, failure to denounce a crime by public officer, material cover-up, falsehood committed by private citizen in public records) all related to the finding in the Trasimeno lake, on October 13th 1985, of a cadaver that was recognized as that of Francesco Narducci." ... "(...) based on the proceedings it was found that the autopsy report on the body which was eventually ordered, and the anthropometric comparison between the cadaver examined at Pavia University and the one photographed on the dock at the Trasimeno lake, in fact did ascertain that Narducci had been murdered, either through strangling or throttling 
  4. ^ a b "Italian court acquits Knox and Sollecito of Kercher murder". BBC News. 28 March 2015. 
  5. ^ a b Cassazione, sentence n. 1105 of Mar. 23. 2015, proceedings 36080/15 (Marasca G., Bruno P.A.), pps. 45 & 49
  6. ^ a b Appeals Court of Florence Third Penal Circuit, Ordnance n. 2/2016 (Martuscelli S., Masi P.), p. 6
  7. ^ Pontini, Erika (8 March 2015). "La Cassazione: processo scandaloso". Il Quotidiano. 
  8. ^ Izzo F., Menichetti G. (2017). Supreme Court of Cassation 4th division, Sentence 42014 / 2017 (PDF). pp. 3,6,7. p.3: "The silence [Sollecito] kept subsequently to his 8th November interrogation, without nor changing his previous versions about his movements between the night of November the 1st and the following morning, either without explaining their incompatibility with the objective facts which were found through analysis of phone traffic and computer interactions, and above all, with Knox’s presence in the house where the murder took place, a presence that is found to be certain and abundantly proven by the sentence of acquittal of the Court of Cassation, and therefore it is a “judicial truth” […]" p.6: "It is anyway ascertained as an objective fact, that Sollecito’s movements on the evening of November 1st 2007 and in the course of the subsequent night, were described every time in a different way in his various declarations, and were always pointedly dispelled under every aspect , like – as the judges of the Reparation Court pointed out – about his use of computer, about the telephone calls he received from his father, and above all, about his presence and the presence of Ms. Knox in the murder house, which they always denied". […] p. 7: "Knox’s presence in the house at the moment of the murder and the dispelling of her alibi, together with the contradicting declarations by Sollecito – who was never heard again during the trial – have so reinforced the [Judge’s] conclusion that Sollecito was also present in the via della Pergola house, contributing to the building of the Preliminary Judge’s prospecting his involvement in the crimes he was suspected of […]" ; Original text: "Il silenzio mantenuto dopo l'interrogatorio di garanzia dell'8 novembre 2007, senza né modificare le precedenti versioni circa i propri movimenti tra la sera dall'1 novembre 2007 e la mattina successiva, né spiegare la loro inconciliabilità con i dati oggettivi emersi dall'esame dei tabulati telefonici e delle interazioni al computer, e soprattutto con la presenza della Knox nella casa teatro dell'omicidio, presenza ritenuta certa ed ampiamente provata dalla sentenza di assoluzione della Corte di Cassazione, e quindi costituente "verità processuale", aveva poi indubbiamente concorso a far ritenere il Sollecito colpevole dalla Corte d'Assise di Perugia, con conseguente mantenimento della misura in questione". […] (p.3) "E' del resto acquisito come dato obiettivo che i movimenti del Sollecito la sera dell'l novembre 2007 e nel corso della successiva notte siano stati descritti in maniera sempre differente nelle varie dichiarazioni, ed abbiano trovato smentite puntuali sotto ogni aspetto, ovvero - come rilevato dai giudici della riparazione - con riferimento all'uso del computer, alle telefonate ricevute dal padre e soprattutto alla presenza sua e della Knox nella casa dell'omicidio, sempre negata". […] (p.6) "La presenza della Knox in casa al momento dell'omicidio e la smentita del suo alibi, insieme alle contraddittorie dichiarazioni del Sollecito, mai più sentito nel corso del dibattimento, hanno perciò rafforzato il convincimento della presenza anche del Sollecito nella casa di via della Pergola, contribuendo a formare nel G.I.P. la prospettiva di un suo coinvolgimento nei delitti a lui attribuiti (p.7)" 
  9. ^ Cassazione, sentence n. 1105 of Mar. 23. 2015, proceedings 36080/15 (Marasca G., Bruno P.A.), p. 43
  10. ^ Cassazione, sentence n. 1105 of Mar. 23. 2015, proceedings 36080/15 (Marasca G., Bruno P.A.), p. 44
  11. ^ name="Cassazione 2015, p. 26">Cassazione, sentence n. 1105 of Mar. 23. 2015, proceedings 36080/15 (Marasca G., Bruno P.A.), p. 26
  12. ^ Marruco, Francesca (8 September 2015). "Judges say Rudy did not kill alone. Strong suspicions against Amanda & Raf, but not beyond reasonable doubt. - I giudici: Rudy non uccise da solo, e forti sospetti contro Amanda e Raf, ma non oltre il ragionevole dubbio". Archived from the original on 19 April 2018. 
  13. ^ Follain, John - Death in Perugia, 2011, Hodder & Stoughton, p.79
  14. ^ "Lollini Lucia, Strappa Lorenzo" (PDF). Il Saggiatore, issue #5 - 2013. 
  15. ^ a b "Mostro di Firenze, condannati il pm Mignini e il poliziotto Giuttari". Corriere.it. Retrieved 2011-10-20. 
  16. ^ "Portale Ufficiale". Procura.Perugia.it. Archived from the original on 2012-04-25. Retrieved 2011-10-20. 
  17. ^ "Mostro di Firenze, morto l'ultimo compagno di merende". Il Fatto Quotidiano. 1 March 2017. 
  18. ^ Mostro di Firenze, caso Narducci: prosciolti tutti gli imputati, Quotidiano.net, 21 April 2010.
  19. ^ NON MORI' ANNEGATO MA PER STRANGOLAMENTO, L'ALTRO CORPO Archived 2012-05-01 at the Wayback Machine., La Stampa, 7 October 2002.
  20. ^ Cardinalini L., Licciardi P., La strana morte del dr. Narducci, Rome 2007, DeriveApprodi; p.85
  21. ^ a b c Mostro di Firenze, nuova pista il mistero del medico suicida, la Repubblica, 31 January 2002.
  22. ^ a b Vertice sulla strana morte del dottor Narducci, la Repubblica, 18 June 2002.
  23. ^ Giannelli, Cristian (3 September 2016). "Il Mostro di Firenze" (PDF). Istituto-Meme.it. Modena: University of Modena. p. 93. 
  24. ^ "Mostro di Firenze. Una lettera d'orrore. Capitolo 11". Cronaca Nera.it. 
  25. ^ "Il proiettile calibro 22 trovato a Ponte a Niccheri". Insufficienza di prove. 
  26. ^ "Mostro di Firenze, delitto 1984 Vicchio (8' 00)". "mostrodifirenze" - Youtube. 
  27. ^ Morte di Pacciani, si indaga per omicidio, Corriere della Sera, 30 March 2001.
  28. ^ Giuttari, Michele; Lucarelli, Carlo. Compagni di sangue, Rizzoli 1999, ISBN 88-17-25858-X Reproduces the transcripts of the telephone conversations
  29. ^ Alvaro Fiorucci. "Il dottore di Perugia e il mostro di Firenze (11' 30)". TVSEI. 
  30. ^ Public Prosecution Office of Perugia, procedure n. 17869 /01 /44 "against unknowns"
  31. ^ Frabetti, Fabio (6 December 2016). "Interview (14'-16')". 
  32. ^ Alvaro Fiorucci. "Il dottore di Perugia e il mostro di Firenze (9' 15)". TVSEI. 
  33. ^ prof. Giovanni Pierucci, consulenza ripetibile, deposited on May. 20. 2002 with the Procura di Perugia, pps. 36-37
  34. ^ Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura (9 January 2017). "Disciplinare - recording". Radio Radicale. pp. 8' 19 – 9' 40. 
  35. ^ a b CASO NARDUCCI-MOSTRO DI FIRENZE/ PARLA IL PADRE. "FRANCESCO ERA MALATO E SI E' SUICIDATO", Umbria Left, 18 July 2008.
  36. ^ Mostro di Firenze, l' ultima accusa: sostituita la salma del medico ucciso, Corriere della Sera, 18 November 2004.
  37. ^ Monster of Florence: Amanda Knox Prosecutor's Satanic Theories Rejected by Judge, Crimesider, CBS News, 23 April 2010.
  38. ^ Frabetti, Paolo. "The Monster of Florence - Interview to Giuliano Mignini (42'00 - 43'-30)". 
  39. ^ Verbale di Assunzione di Informazioni. Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribuanale di Perugia. 23 February 2006. p. 3. At this point, as we note that the answers by Mr. Preston appear to be reticent, since [in the phone recording] he seems to have been fully aware about details of the operation that was being carried on by Mr. Spezi, and both of them [in the phone recording] they appear to be fully aware that the operation had a non-transparent nature and aimed at planting elements of evidence against individuals of the Sardinian community and against the same owner of the villa, such elements being maliciously premeditated against those same individuals, and they show evidence of a serious involvement of the people who accompaigned Mr. Preston in criminal activities, and since it is unrealistic - also based on the phone wiretapping which has been made listen to the same Mr. Preston - that the same could have been unaware about the real content of the same operation, so noted, at 14:50 we stop the hearing based on art. 63 of penal procedure code, since evidence emerged that Mr. Preston committed the crime to which art. 371bis penal code applies on 2006 02. 23. in Perugia, an offence against the Minister of Justice [perjury]. The same Mr. Preston is urged to appoint a defence attorney of his trust. He is also told his previous declarations cannot be used against him. 
  40. ^ Florence Police GIDeS dep. (7 April 2006). "Informativa" quoted in: Request of Cautionary Custody. Prosecution Office Perugia. p. 3. From the telephone contacts between the three individuals (Spezi – Zaccaria – Ruocco) such events were detected that can be summarized as follows: 1.The spotting of a villa where Mr. Ruocco, by using a small photo camera provided by Mr. Spezi (who had been given it by Florentine photographer Massimo Sestini) reportedly has been at location more than once, by night, in order to shot some pictures, which he later gave to Mr. Spezi; 2.The giving explanation about the location of the villa by Mr. Ruocco to the other two; however they were unable to locate it exactly themselves; 3.Mr. Ruocco accompanying Mr. Spezi and Mr. Zaccaria on the place; 4.A subsequent survey of the place during day time by Spezi and Zaccaria; on this occasion they were followed by hired personnel which this way identified the place as ‘Villa Bibbiani’, property of the Del Gratta family, located in the comune of Limite e Capraia; 5.A further exploration by the two together with a third person, who – we learn – was American journalist and author Mr. Douglas Preston; 6.The writing of a note with indications about the villa to be given to Dr. Bernabei, executive of the Questura of Florence, with the purpose to induce the executive to go for a “walk” [passeggiata] on that location and be able to find there a number of pieces of circumstantial evidence that could be linked to the Monster of Florence, among them ‘six small boxes’; 7.A visit done by Mr. Zaccaria to the Questura, while Mr. Spezi was waiting for him outside the building; 8.Euphoric mood expressed by the two (Mr. Spezi and Mr. Zaccaria) and soon after also by Mr. Douglas Preston, on believing that everything was done already and that within a short time the police would do the passeggiata so the three would achieve a “global strike” and would solve all their problems. 
  41. ^ GiDeS (7 April 2006). "Informativa 27.02 2006" quoted in: Request of Cautionary Custody. Prosecution Office Perugia. p. 6. Mr. Ferdinando Zaccaria, in such occasion, admitted to the activity carried on by Spezi, by Ruocco and by himself, explaining that such result would have made a “world scoop”, subsequently to which they would have made “a lot of money”.  
  42. ^ La Repubblica - Perugia (8 April 2006). "Mostro di Firenze, colloqui vietati per Spezi accusato di depistaggio". Pugno duro del giudice nei confronti di Mario Spezi 
  43. ^ a b Del Vigo, Silvio: "I metodi di Giuliano Mignini: sei mio nemico? Vai indagato", blog.panorama.it, 2 August 2010, accessed 17 October 2011.
  44. ^ source: AGI (9 April 2006). "Si terrà martedì prossimo l'interrogatorio di garanzia dei due arrestati, anche se si attende la conferma definitiva". "Rome, 9 April 2006. Defence attorney Antonio Traversi explained "The prohibition of counsel is legitimate, to be fair it is usually applied to charges of a different gravity, given that the order of cautionary custody is not about a murder but about crimes of a very different nature and degree of danger, anyway there was this prohibition and we complied" Italian: "Roma, 9 aprile 2006. Il difensore Sandro Traversi spiegando che «è legittimo il divieto ai colloqui, per la verità generalmente applicato in processi di ben altra portata, visto che qui l'ordinanza di custodia cautelare riguarda non l'omicidio ma reati di natura e di pericolosità ben diversa, comunque c'è questo divieto e ci siamo attenuti» 
  45. ^ Isola, Justine. "The journalist and the Murderer". 
  46. ^ Sentenza Suprema Corte di Cassazione, 3. 21. 2013, A.M. Lombardi, R. Grillo, p.15, § 4.1
  47. ^ http://m.ilmessaggero.it/m/messaggero/articolo/umbria/260272 Caso Narducci, l'inchiesta riparte da una lettera, Il Messaggero, 23 March 2013.
  48. ^ Selvatici, Franca (20 October 2006). "Registrazioni segrete di Giuttari". La Repubblica. 
  49. ^ Selvatici, Franca (21 October 2006). "Mostro, tolti i sigilli al Gides". La Repubblica. 
  50. ^ Trubunal of Florence, sentence n. 321/2010, 22 Jan. 2010 (deposited on 21 Apr. 2010); pp. 139-164, 192, 196
  51. ^ Henderson, Mark. The Times. London http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article6999196.ece.  Missing or empty |title= (help)
  52. ^ Preston, Douglas (25 November 2010). "Amanda Knox appeal: 'Italians are embarrassed by this case'". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 16 October 2011. 
  53. ^ Vogt, Andrea: "The debate continues over Knox's guilt", SeattlePI.com, 14 December 2009, accessed 17 October 2011.
  54. ^ Barbie, Nadeau (2010). Angel Face. Beast Books. p. 94. ISBN 978-0-9842951-3-5. 
  55. ^ "Mostro Firenze: Annullate condanne a pm Mignini e Giuttari". ANSA. 22 November 2011. Retrieved 22 November 2011. 
  56. ^ source: ANSA (9 February 2013). "Mostro: la Cassazione respinge il ricorso della procura generale a carico di Giuliano Mignini e di Michele Giuttari Secondo la corte d'Appello la competenza territoriale spetta a Torino dove saranno trasmessi gli atti". gonews.it. Nel novembre 2011, la corte d'Appello di Firenze aveva annullato la sentenza di primo grado 
  57. ^ Paoli Gigi, L'amarezza di Mignini "7 anni per aver ragione" - La Nazione, 10 February 2013
  58. ^ "Indagini ritorsive: scagionato il PM di Perugia". Umbria24. 20 March 2017. 
  59. ^ Povoledo, Elisabetta: "Amanda Knox Freed After Appeal in Italian Court", The New York Times, 3 October 2011. Accessed 19 October 2011.
  60. ^ Burleigh, Nina (2011). "Amanda Knox Trial: The Tough Women Involved in the Case". time.com. Time. Retrieved 2 June 2011. 
  61. ^ Kington, Tom: "Giuliano Mignini: Knox prosecutor who believes he is the conspiracy victim", The Guardian, 3 October 2011, accessed at guardian.com on 22 October 2011.
  62. ^ Tales from Italy’s Dark Side: Interview with Douglas Preston http://www.nuok.it/2010/05/tales-from-italy-s-dark-side-interview-with-douglas-preston/
  63. ^ American Girl, Italian Nightmare from CBS News
  64. ^ American Student Convicted of Murder in Italy; President Obama's Approval Numbers Sliding, Anderson Cooper 360° transcript
  65. ^ Izola, Justine. "The Journalist and the Murderer". 
  66. ^ GoNews
  67. ^ Cassazione, sentence n. 1105 of Mar. 23. 2015, proceedings 36080/15 (Marasca G., Bruno P.A.), p. 26
  68. ^ admon: "Sollecito querelato per diffamazione da Giuliano Mignini", La Foccia, 15 February 2013, accessed at lagoccia.eu on 15 February 2013.
  69. ^ TrgMedia (5 December 2015). "Il Csm censura il pm Mignini per la procedura con la quale vietò a Sollecito il colloqui col suo difensore. Decisione solo orale e non scritta". trgmedia.it. 
  70. ^ http://www.lagazzettadigitale.it/raffaele-sollecito-casamassima-libro-un-passo-fuori-dalla-notte/
  71. ^ "Assolta la pornostar Brigitta: non coinvolse minori nella sua esibizione", Panorama.it, 6 October 2011, accessed 25 October 2011.
  72. ^ a b c "Belluno/ La pornostar Bulgari assolta. "Io come Amanda"", Libero.it, 8 October 2011, accessed 25 October 2011.
  73. ^ Martinez, Edecio: "Brigitta Bulgari: Playboy Model Arrested on Child Sex Charges", cbsnews.com, June 2, 2010, accessed 25 October 2011.