Goa Opinion Poll
This article needs additional citations for verification. (November 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
The Goa Opinion Poll was a referendum held in the state of Goa, India, on 16 January 1967, to decide the future of the Union Territory of Goa, Daman and Diu within the Indian Union. Although popularly called an opinion poll, it was in fact, a referendum, as the results of the poll were binding on the government of India. The referendum offered the people of Goa a choice between continuing as a union territory or merging with the state of Maharashtra. It is the only referendum to have been held in independent India. The people of Goa voted against the merger and Goa continued to be a union territory. Subsequently, in 1987, Goa became a full-fledged state within the Indian Union.
- 1 Background
- 2 Political situation
- 3 Demand for a referendum
- 4 Arguments in favour of merger
- 5 Arguments against the merger
- 6 Buildup to the referendum
- 7 Referendum
- 8 Criticism
- 9 Subsequent events
- 10 See also
- 11 References
- 12 External links
India gained its independence from the British in 1947. Goa was the largest part of the Portuguese possession in India, the other territories being small enclaves. In 1961, India incorporated these territories after a liberation of Portugal's Indian colonies. At the time of Goa's accession into India, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru had promised that Goa would retain its distinct identity. Even prior to the annexation of Goa, Nehru had promised that the people of Goa would be consulted on any decision about their territory.[unreliable source?]
In the meantime, the provinces of India had been reorganized on linguistic basis. This happened due to the intense political movements for language-based states as well as a need to effectively administer a diverse country. Among the prominent movements for linguistic states was the Samyukta Maharashtra movement. In 1960, The state of Bombay was partitioned into two new states: the state of Maharashtra, which encompassed the Marathi speaking areas; and Gujarat where Gujarati was predominant.
The language question
One of the main reasons leading to the referendum was the diglossic situation among the people of Goa. Konkani was the main language spoken in Goa. Apart from this, many Konkani people were bilingual; they spoke both Marathi and Konkani. Among the Hindus in Goa, Marathi occupied a higher status and their culture was similar to the culture of the neighbouring state. Konkani was spoken at home and in the bazaars, but religious literature, ceremonies etc. were in Marathi. Some people in Goa considered Konkani to be a dialect of Marathi and hence by reason, considered all Goans to be of Marathi ethnicity. As a result, there were demands from various sections in Goa as well as from Maharashtra to merge Goa into Maharashtra.
Since Goa was an acquired territory, it was not given immediate statehood but was incorporated as a Union Territory. As Goa did not have its own state legislature, fearing for the identity of Goa Roqui Santan a Prince of Goa opposed the nomination by Governor and organised a 3-day Satyagraha for early democracy in Goa. Subsequently, Goa's first polls were held on 9 December 1963 and for this Roqui Santan is popularly known as 'Father of Goan Democracy'.
The two main parties, UGP and MGP, were formed with two opposing ideologies contest the first election. The Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party (Pro-Maharashtra Goan Party) wanted to merge the state of Goa into the newly formed state of Maharashtra. The United Goans Party wanted to retain independent statehood for the former Portuguese enclaves  The MGP had the support of the lower castes among Goa's Hindus, whereas the UGP was dominated by Catholics with some support from upper-caste Hindus.
Of the 30 seats in the Goa, Daman and Diu assembly, 28 belonged to Goa, and one each to Daman and Diu. MGP formed the government, having secured 16 seats strengthening the merger movement while UGP secured 12 seats and occupied opposition benches. The assembly of Goa, Daman and Diu convened on 9 January 1964.
Demand for a referendum
Prime minister Jawahar Lal Nehru had promised in 1963 that Goa would remain a Union Territory for ten years after which the future of Goa would be decided in accordance with the wishes of the people of Goa. The MGP was not prepared to wait for that long.
The MGP and politicians in Maharashtra were elated at the victory and touted it as a mandate that the majority of Goans were in favour of merger. Dayanand Bandodkar, the leader of MGP and the first Chief Minister of Goa, proclaimed that by voting the MGP into power, the people of Goa had, in effect, voted in favour of merger with Maharashtra. According to them, passing a bill in the state legislature was all that was needed. Passing a bill in the assembly would be easy for the MGP as they had a simple majority.
In a representative democracy like India, the elected representatives take the decisions. It is in very rare conditions that the onus of decision making is put directly on the public.
The United Goans Party, headed by Dr. Jack de Sequeira, also knew that if the issue was put to vote in the state assembly, merger was a foregone conclusion. Merging Goa into another state was a monumental decision. Also the very future of the state and the identity of the Goan people was at stake. So they pressed for a people's referendum instead of a vote among the representatives; as was the norm in a Parliamentary democracy like India.
He visited New Delhi along other MLAs and impressed Nehru about the need of an opinion poll on this matter. However he died before Parliament could take this decision and Lal Bahadur Shastri succeeded him as Prime Minister. A delegation consisting of MGP MLAs and Maharashtra's leaders went to New Delhi to convince him that a vote on the merger should be conducted in the Goa Assembly.
Dr. Sequeira, along with his delegation, went to Bangalore where an AICC session was being held and met Shastri. They opposed the move to get the merger voted in the Assembly and impressed on Shastri and Kamraj, the need to put this question before the people of Goa themselves instead of a vote in the Assembly. However Shastri died in 1966 in Tashkent and this decision was now left to the new Prime Minister Indira Gandhi.
Again Dr. Sequeira along with other MLAs met Indira Gandhi and submitted a memorandum that such a monumental decision affecting the future of the State could not be left to legislators alone, but should be put before the people to decide. Purushottam Kakodkar, the president of the Goa unit of the Congress Party, used his personal equations with the Nehru family to lobby hard for a referendum with the central leadership. According to one source, he reportedly "almost lost his sanity" trying to do so.
The referendum could be conducted via a signature campaign or by secret ballot. UGP also demanded that expatriate Goans staying in other parts of India or the world, should be allowed to vote by postal ballot. However this request was denied.
The President of India gave his assent to the Goa, Daman and Diu (Opinion Poll) Act on 16 December 1966 after it was passed in both houses of the parliament. 16 January 1967 was chosen as the date for the referendum.
Now that the referendum would be conducted, the anti-merger faction feared that Bandodkar may use the state's administrative and law-enforcement machinery to browbeat the anti-mergerists into submission. The UGP demanded that the MGP government resign so that the referendum could be conducted in a free-and-fair atmosphere. The central government conceded and on 3 December 1966, the MGP government resigned .
Arguments in favour of merger
- Goa was too small to administer itself and its effective administration would only be possible as a part of a larger state.
- Similarities between culture and traditions of Hindus in both the states.
- Strong historical and cultural ties with Maharashtra
- The belief that Konkani is a dialect of Marathi and that Marathi is the mother tongue of all Goans.
The MGP had the backing of the depressed classes and landless tenants of Goa as well as the landlord warrior class which were ethnically Marathas along with the other Goans and were of the thinking that the clerks (Brahmins or shenvis) had won undue favors from Portuguese in terms of land and money which they consider themselves as the rightful heir as they were the rulers. They were convinced that the only way to overthrow the dominance of the upper caste Hindu Brahmins, bhatkaars(land-owners) and the Catholics who had benefited from Portuguese rule; was to merge into Maharashtra. After merger these previously dominant groups would count for nothing within the vast Maharashtrian populace and their influence would vanish.
The MGP had promised that Goa would be granted several concessions after merger with Maharashtra. The chief minister of Maharashtra, Vasantrao Naik, backed up these promises. Some of these promises were:
- Preferential treatment to Goans in government jobs
- Industrial and agricultural development
- Prohibition would not be applicable to Goa
- Government notices in Goa to be posted in Konkani
- Creation of a separate university for Goa
- Development of Konkani language
Arguments against the merger
- Konkani is an independent language and not a dialect of Marathi. It was underdeveloped due to the suppression of the language.
- Konkani would be replaced by Marathi
- Goa had an identity of its own. Goan culture was a mix of East and the west having been under Portuguese occupation for nearly 450 years.
- If Goa was merged, Goan culture would be subsumed in Marathi culture and disappear.
- Goa would be reduced from a state to a "backwater district of Maharashtra".
- Prohibition would be imposed in Goa, which had a significant rate of alcohol consumption and brewing industry. It would also affect the toddy tappers(Render caste)
- Merger would result in a loss of jobs for Goans. The Shiv Sena, a Marathi regionalist party had emerged in Maharashtra in 1966 which favoured a sons-of-the-soil policy; demanding preferential treatment for ethnic Marathis in jobs. It also spearheaded violent attacks against South Indians in the city of Mumbai which is capital of Southern as well as Western state Maharashtra. If their moves succeeded, Goans would be sidelined for jobs in their own state.
The Christians of Goa accounted for around 250,000 Roman Catholics during the 1960s a major portion of the Goan population and had considerable influence were fearful that the merger would reduce their political influence to nothing in the merged entity. Many Goan Hindus, on the other hand, have relatives in Maharashtra, and most speak a dialect of the Marathi language. But the determining question was whether Goa should cease to exist. Unlike the Hindus, for whom Marathi was a medium of religious instruction, the Christians did not use Marathi. They mostly spoke in Konkani and did not have any feelings for Marathi. The pro-merger argument that Konkani was a dialect of Marathi did not please them.
Buildup to the referendum
Campaigning for the referendum began one month before the vote and was vigorous.
The pro-merger group received support from leaders of Maharashtra, cutting across political lines.
Dr. Sequeria toured extensively over Goa conducting public meetings explaining the anti-merger stand. He also went to many places outside Goa, such as the city of Bombay which had a sizeable Goan community to highlight the issue. However, later it turned out that this was in vain as only resident Goans were allowed to vote. He was aided in his tasks by his son Erasmo.
The tiatrists of Goa (stage-play performers and writers) campaigned earnestly with Konkani songs written by young writers like Ulhas Buyao[permanent dead link], Dr Manoharrai Sardesai, Shankar Bhandari and Adv Uday Bhembre. The pro-merger groups began disrupting Buyao's programmes in their stronghold areas. Buyao's songs Goenchea Mhojea Goenkaramno and Channeache Rati inspired many Goans. Many people now feel that Goa should never have accepted the Indian parliament enacted Goa Opinion Poll Act. Because an opinion Poll of such kind cannot be termed as a Plebiscite or a referendum. Thus Goa never was givenits mandatory right of a Plebiscite.
Goa's main Marathi newspaper Gomantak pursued a pro-merger view. To counter this Rashtramat a new Marathi daily, was started to influence the Marathi readers (who were mostly pro-merger) against the merger. Its chief editor was Chandrakant Keni . Uday Bhembre wrote a fiery column Brahmastra, took a stance opposing his pro-merger father. The Rashtramat proved critical in bringing many of the pro-Marathi faction to vote against the merger.
The referendum offered the people of Goa, Daman and Diu two options
- To merge Goa with Maharashtra; and Daman and Diu with Gujarat. Or
- To remain a Union Territory of India.
The two options were represented by two symbols: A flower for merger, and two leaves for retaining independent identity. Voters had to pace a "X" mark against the symbol of choice.
The poll was held on 16 January 1967. Polling was largely peaceful with reports of a few incidents. Supporters from both sides tried their best to ensure that people voted.
|Union territory संघ प्रदेश||172,191||54.20|
There were 388,432 eligible voters. A total of 317,633 votes were polled. Three days were allotted for the counting. 54.20% voted against merger whereas 43.50% voted in favour. Thus, despite the Hindus' numerical superiority, Goans rejected the merger with Maharashtra by a vote of 172,191 to 138,170. The anti-mergerists won by 34,021 votes. In the territorial capital of Panjim, the results were cheered by a crowd of 10,000, who danced in the streets carrying branches symbolic of victory, set off firecrackers, and created such a joyous disturbance that the government had to call in police with tear gas to restore order.
An analysis of the voting patterns shows that the voting patterns closely followed the patterns of the 1963 assembly election. However, a significant section of MGP's supporters had voted against the merger without which the pro-merger faction would have won.
Results by constituency
|Source: The Historic Opinion Poll, Goa News|
The opinion poll received a great deal of criticism from the anti-mergerists. Their grievance was that the Opinion Poll only offered them status-quo as a self-administering union territory instead of full statehood that they desired. According to them the referendum should not have been on the issue of merger with Goa, but whether Goa should have an independent legislature or not. This issue led to a split in the UGP.
Despite the MGP's pro-merger move being defeated, it won the subsequent elections again in 1967 and 1972. For the UGP, although the opinion poll victory was a vindication of their efforts, it did not translate into electoral gains. Dr Jack de Sequeira was criticized for agreeing to clause in the referendum that did not confer full statehood to Goa. A group led by Alvaro de Loyola Furtado split from the party. The party later faded away.
Goa did not achieve full statehood in 1971 as was expected. Following persistent demands; including a 1976 resolution by the Goa assembly demanding full statehood; Goa finally became a state on 30 May 1987. Daman and Diu were separated from Goa and continue to be administered as the Union territory of Daman and Diu.
The status of Konkani
The status of Konkani was closely related to the issue of statehood for Goa. Although the issue of statehood was resolved in 1967, the Konkani Marathi dispute continued to simmer. In 1975 the Sahitya Akademi recognised Konkani as an independent language.
In 1987, the Goa legislative assembly passed a bill making Konkani the official language of Goa. Although the bill did not explicitly grant Marathi any official status in Goa, it contains safeguards for the use of Marathi in official communication and education.
In 1992, Konkani was included in the Eight Schedule of the constitution of India.
16 January is observed as Asmitai Divas (Identity Day) in Goa.
- Daman and Diu
- History of Goa
- Portuguese India
- Reorganisation of States
- United Goans Party
- Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party
- "Goa after Independence". Maps of India. Retrieved 15 May 2009.
- Faleiro, Valmiki. "What a Monumental Shame !". The Goan Forum. Archived from the original on 3 March 2007. Retrieved 16 May 2009.
- Prabhudesai, Sandesh. "THE HISTORIC OPINION POLL". p. 1. Archived from the original on 20 July 2008. Retrieved 12 May 2009.
- "GOA: The Merger Issue and the Opinion Poll of 1967". knol. Retrieved 15 May 2009.[dead link]
- "KONKANI LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE". Goa Konkani Akademi. Archived from the original on 28 August 2008. Retrieved 2009-05-18.
Some Goans, especially from the older generation hold that blind faith that they are, geographically and culturally, the part of Maharashtra and Marathi culture.
- Pandit, Ashwin C. "Konkani - ABOUT MY LANGUAGE". Language Documentation Training Center , Linguistic Society of Hawaii. Archived from the original on 18 September 2009. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
The tendency of many Marathi speakers to consider Konkani as a dialect rather than a language contributed further to the rift between the two speakers. Many Goan Hindus adopted Marathi for purposes of convenience as many left the state in search of jobs to Bombay.
- "Goans pay rich tributes to Roque Santana". Gomantak Times. Panjim. 16 March 2012. Retrieved 22 February 2018.
- "Goa Gazetteer Department". Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- "RoquSantana anniversary observed". Retrieved 10 January 2018.
- "GoaCentral.Com-History of Goa". Archived from the original on 11 January 2007. Retrieved 13 May 2009.
- Prabhudesai, Sandesh. "THE HISTORIC OPINION POLL". Archived from the original on 20 July 2008. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
The controversy also had social overtones as most of the then feudal lords – known as bhatkars – were backing the UGP, though the party basically represented the minority Christian community of the state. On the contrary, Bandodkar's MGP was supported by most of the tenant class of Goan society, who wanted to seek second liberation by becoming owners of the tenanted land they were tilling for generations together
- BosPam. "GOA: The Merger Issue and the Opinion Poll of 1967". knol.google.com. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
The Maharashtra Gomantak Party, which was committed to the cause of merger with Maharashtra, was largely supported by the Bahujan Samaj (lower castes) whereas the United Goans Party who led the anti-merger view were largely supported by Catholics and upper caste Hindus.[permanent dead link]
- Sakshena, R.N. (2003). Goa: Into the Mainstream. Abhinav Publications. ISBN 9788170170051. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
All the political parties in Goa were anxious to have a fair election, for which the resignation of the Bandodkar ministry was demanded. ... It was feared that unless these people were not kept away from the territory or from the position of power, expression of free and fair opinion would not be possible.
Faleiro, Valmiki. "What a Monumental Shame !". The Goan Forum. Archived from the original on 3 March 2007. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
The MGP won Goa’s first elections to the Legislative Assembly. The Maharashtra lobby immediately went pro-active in Delhi, interpreting the mandate as a pro-merger vote and demanding that Goa be forthwith merged into Maharashtra.
- "Goa: But Not Gone". Time. 27 January 1967. Retrieved 15 May 2009.
- "GOA: The Merger Issue and the Opinion Poll of 1967". knol.google.com. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
An important feature of their discord was the preservation of Goan cultural heritage. A merger would lead to a significant loss and decadence of the Goan culture. Pre-eminent in the minds of Goans was that Goa would lose its identity – its unique blend of East and West.[permanent dead link]
- Faleiro, Valmiki. "What a Monumental Shame !". The Goan Forum. Archived from the original on 3 March 2007. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
Fortunately, we had leaders who convinced New Delhi that local Assembly results did not reflect the Goan mind on merger and that the issue be decided by a separate referendum. Leaders like Purshottam Kakodkar, who enjoyed a personal equation with the Nehru household, and the redoubtable Dr. Jack de Sequeira, who led an equally steely opposition in the Goa Assembly.
- Faleiro, Valmiki. "What a Monumental Shame !". Archived from the original on 3 March 2007. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
While Kakodkar lobbied hard and long with Nehru and other central leaders (and, in the process, almost lost his sanity),...
- "GOA: The Merger Issue and the Opinion Poll of 1967". Retrieved 18 May 2009.
The campaign began in earnest a month prior to the vote.[permanent dead link]
- "GOA: The Merger Issue and the Opinion Poll of 1967". Retrieved 18 May 2009.
Maharashtra’s political leaders of every political persuasion supported the merger and tried to sway the people of Goa.[permanent dead link]
- Kamat Maad, Govind (4 February 2009). "Noted Konkani protagonist Chandrakant Keni no more". The Times of India. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
Keni was the editor of Rashtramat, a vernacular daily published from Margao, whose role in creating mass awareness during the historic Opinion Poll of 1967 is legendary. Keni played a key role in forming public opinion in favour of retaining Goa’s separate identity as opposed to its merger with Maharashtra through his thought-provoking and inspirational writings.
- "THE HISTORIC OPINION POLL". Archived from the original on 20 July 2008. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
... Rashtramat news reports, editorials by Chandrakant Keni and especially Brahmastra – a column written by Adv Bhembre – turned the tables against pro-mergerists. Lots of educated people from Hindu bahujan samaj realised that their future lies in retaining Goa's separate identity and not by merging it into Maharashtra.
- "THE HISTORIC OPINION POLL". Archived from the original on 9 July 2015. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
Overscoring the Flower, Two Leaves won the elections by 34,021 votes.
- "GOA: The Merger Issue and the Opinion Poll of 1967". Retrieved 18 May 2009.
“The Opinion Poll Act” faced severe criticism from within the territory of Goa. The United Goans Party demanded a separate referendum for the institution of an independent legislature and wanted to eliminate the idea of a merger. This led to a splinter in the party: four members of the Legislative Assembly, headed by Mr. Alvaro Deloyla Furtado left the party since they did not favour the idea of the Opinion Poll.[permanent dead link]