Goods and Services Tax (India) Bill
The Goods and Service Tax Bill or GST Bill, officially known to be The Constitution (122nd Amendment) Bill, 2014, would be a Value added Tax (VAT) to be implemented in India, from April 2016. GST stands for “Goods and Services Tax”, and is proposed to be a comprehensive indirect tax levy on manufacture, sale and consumption of goods as well as services at the national level. It will replace all indirect taxes levied on goods and services by the Indian Central and State governments. GST is a comprehensive value added tax on goods and services. It is levied and collected on value addition at each stage of sale or purchase of goods or supply of services based on input tax credit method but without State boundaries. There is no distinction between taxable goods and taxable services and they are taxed at a single rate in a supply chain of goods and services till the goods / services reach the consumer. The administrative power generally vests with a single authority to levy tax on goods and services. It is aimed at being comprehensive for most goods and services. Exports will be zero-rated and imports will be levied the same taxes as domestic goods and services adhering to the destination principle. The introduction of Goods and Services Tax (GST) would be a very significant step in the field of indirect tax reforms in India.
- By amalgamating a large number of Central and State taxes into a single tax, it would mitigate cascading or double taxation in a major way and pave the way for a common national market.
- From the consumer point of view, the biggest advantage would be in terms of a reduction in the overall tax burden on goods, which is currently estimated at 25%-30%.
- Introduction of GST would also make Indian products competitive in the domestic and international markets.
- Studies show that this would instantly spur economic growth.
- Last but not the least, this tax, because of its transparent character, would be easier to administer.
- 1 Present Indian taxation structure and its Limitations
- 2 Concept of Goods and Service tax
- 3 Benefits and Limitations of GST to various Stake holders
- 4 History in Parliament and Empowered Committee
- 5 Legislative history
- 6 Tax-Rate under the proposed GST
- 7 Renewed GST concerns
- 8 GST elsewhere
- 9 See also
- 10 References
- 11 External links
Present Indian taxation structure and its Limitations
|This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (July 2015)|
Concept of Goods and Service tax
Benefits and Limitations of GST to various Stake holders
History in Parliament and Empowered Committee
In 2000, the Vajpayee Government started discussion on GST by setting up an empowered committee. The committee was headed by Asim Dasgupta, (Finance Minister, Government of West Bengal). It was given the task of designing the GST model and overseeing the IT back-end preparedness for its rollout.
In 2012, Ashish Gupta son of Ramji Lal Gupta financial analyst of IBS Hyderabad submitted his report on impact on Indian economy post which it was amended in constitution under his name.
It is considered to be a major improvement over the pre-existing central excise duty at the national level and the sales tax system at the state level, the new tax will be a further significant breakthrough and the next logical step towards a comprehensive indirect tax reform in the country.
Keeping this overall objective in view, an announcementwas made by Palaniappan Chidambaram, the Union Finance Minister, during the central budget of 2007–2008 that it would be introduced from April 1, 2010 and that the Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers, on his request, would work with the Central Government to prepare a road map for introduction of GST in India.
After this announcement, the Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers decided to set up a Joint Working Group on May 10, 2007, with the Adviser to the Union Finance Minister and the Member-Secretary of Empowered Committee as co-convenors and the concerned Joint Secretaries of the Department of Revenue of Union Finance Ministry and all Finance Secretaries of the states as its members. The Joint Working Group, after intensive internal discussions as well as interaction with experts and representatives of Chambers of Commerce and Industry, submitted its report to the Empowered Committee on November 19, 2007.
This report was then discussed in detail in the meeting of Empowered Committee on November 28, 2007. On the basis of this discussion and the written observations of the states, certain modifications were made, and a final version of the views of Empowered Committee at that stage was prepared and was sent to the Government of India (April 30, 2008). The commentsof the Government of India were received on December 12, 2008 and were duly considered by the Empowered Committee (December 16, 2008).
The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-second Amendment) Bill, 2014 was introduced in the Lok Sabha by Finance Minster Arun Jaitley on 19 December 2014. The Bill was passed by the House on 5 May 2015, receiving 352 votes for and 37 against. All 37 no votes came from members of the AIADMK. The Indian National Congress, which opposed the Bill, walked out of the House before voting began. Although, the BJD and the CPI(M) had previously opposed the Bill, they cast votes in favour. The Government attempted to move the Bill for consideration in the Rajya Sabha on 11 May 2015. However, members of the Opposition repeatedly stalled the proceedings of the House. In order to appease the Opposition's demand for further scrutiny of the Bill, Jaitely moved a motion to refer the Bill to a Select Committee. The 21 member Committee is expected to give its report by the end of the Monsoon session.
Tax-Rate under the proposed GST
The tax-rate under the proposed GST would come down, but the number of assesses would increase by 5-6 times. Although rates would come down, tax collection would go up due to increased buoyancy. The government is working on a special IT platform for smooth implementation of the proposed Goods and Services Tax (GST). The IT special purpose vehicle (SPV) christened as GST N (Network) will be owned by three stakeholders—the centre, the states and the technology partner NSDL, then Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) Chairman S Dutt Majumdar said while addressing a "National Conference on GST". On the possibility of rolling out GST, he said, "There was no need for alarm if GST was not rolled out in April 1, 2012."
Renewed GST concerns
With heterogeneous State laws on VAT, the debate on the necessity for a GST has been reignited. The best GST systems across the world use a single GST, while India has opted for a dual-GST model. Critics claim that CGST, SGST and IGST are nothing but new names for Central Excise/Service Tax, VAT and CST, and hence GST brings nothing new to the table. The concept of value-added has never been utilised in the levy of service, as the Delhi High Court is attempting to prove in the case of Home Solution Retail, while under Central Excise the focus is on defining and refining the definition of manufacture, instead of focusing on value additions. The Revenue can be very stubborn when it comes to refunds, as the Maharashtra Government proves, and software entities that applied for refunds on excess service tax paid on inputs discovered.
The all-new Cenvat Credit Rules, 2014 do little to clarify eligibility for input credits, by using general terms such as “ any goods which have no relationship whatsoever with the manufacture of a final product” and “ services used primarily for personal use or consumption of any employee”. Before penning the GST Act and Rules, the Empowered Committee would do well to take a hard look at all the present laws that GST subsumes and their complexities. It could tempt them to rethink on the necessity to draft even the preamble 
This change in the tax structure is going to have a huge impact in the current supply chain of India. It is currently sub-optimal, and has been structured in such a fashion to avoid taxes. The supply chain tax structure of India can be broadly classified in the following categories. Threshold limit of traders, with turnover below 10 lakhs, need not register, is a concept brought from VAT system. This can cause ambiguity. The argument that small traders can not be handled by the system is not true. A country that can give a Unique ID to every citizen, can as well give registration service to small traders. They should not be eliminated from the Tax system. Even the compounding system, of charging 0.5% for the traders with below 50 lakhs turnover, can cause undesirable results. They also should not be eliminated from the tax system. It is not fair to restrict them from certain trade activities, such as selling to other states. The registered trader will have to face loss of input tax, if he buys either from threshold trader or compounded traders.
While countries such as Singapore and New Zealand tax virtually everything at a single rate, Indonesia has five positive rates, a zero rate and over 30 categories of exemptions. In China, GST applies only to goods and the provision of repairs, replacement and processing services. It is only recoverable on goods used in the production process, and GST on fixed assets is not recoverable.
There is a separate business tax in the form of VAT. For example, when the GST was introduced in New Zealand in 1986, it yielded revenues that were 45 per cent higher than anticipated, in large part due to improved compliance. It is more neutral and efficient structure could yield significant dividends to the economy in increased output and productivity. The GST in Canada replaced the federal manufacturers’ sales tax which was then levied at the rate of 60 per cent and was similar in design and structure as the CENVAT in India. It is estimated that this replacement resulted in an increase in potential GDP by 24 per cent, consisting of 12.4 per cent increase in national income from higher factor productivity and 50 per cent increase from a larger capital stock (due to elimination of tax cascading). The Canadian experience is suggestive of the potential benefits to the Indian economy. This means gains of about US$15 billion annually. This is indeed a staggering sum and suggests the need for energetic action to usher the GST regime at an early date. GST rates of some countries are given below.
|Country||Rate of GST|
- Proposal but Arun Jaitley in lok sabha said that 27% will be too high the actual figure will decided by GST council and it should around 18%
- Value-added taxation in India
- Value added tax
- Goods and Services Tax (Australia)
- Goods and Services Tax (Canada)
- Goods and Services Tax (Hong Kong)
- Goods and Services Tax (New Zealand)
- Goods and Services Tax (Singapore)
- Value Added Tax (United Kingdom)
- "Modi to quit as GST panel head today". The Telegraph (Calcutta, India). 16 June 2013. Retrieved 17 June 2013.
- "Post Sushil Modi, GST Committee will have to find new chief". The Times Of India. 16 June 2013. Retrieved 17 June 2013.
- "Modi in, Modi out: Splitting headache for UPA on GST". Firstpost. 17 June 2013. Retrieved 17 June 2013.