This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Government phonology (GP) is a theoretical framework of linguistics, and more specifically of phonology. The framework aims to provide a non-arbitrary account for phonological phenomena by replacing the rule component of phonology with a restricted set of universal principles and parameters. As in Noam Chomsky’s principles and parameters approach to syntax, the differences in phonological systems across languages are captured through different combinations of parametric settings.
In GP, phonological representations consist of zero (e.g. vowel-zero in French) or more combinations of elements. These elements are the primitives of the theory and are deemed to be universally present in all human phonological systems. They are assumed to correspond to characteristic acoustic signatures in the signal, or hot features as previously referred to.
There are 6 elements believed to be existent across all languages. They are (A), (I), (U), (ʔ), (L) and (H). These represent backness, frontness, roundness, stopness, voicing/nasality and frication/aspiration respectively.
As in French, it is possible to have empty nuclei, marked (_), which are subject to the phonological Empty Category Principle (ECP) . Unlike features, each element is a monovalent, and potentially interpretable phonological expression. Its actual interpretation depends on what phonological constituent dominates it, and whether it occupies a head or operator position within a phonological expression.
Today, whilst Optimality Theory has become the dominant theory in phonology, GP continues to develop. Pöchtrager, for example, proposes GP 2.0, another version of GP that strives to further reduce the number of elements by capturing manner of articulation with structure.
- Pöchtrager, M. A. (2006). The structure of length. PhD Thesis. Vienna: Universität Wien.,
Cyran, Eugeniusz. (2010) Complexity Scales and Licensing in Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Charette, Monik. (1990) Licence to Govern. Phonology Vol. 7, No. 2, (1990), 233-253.
Charette, Monik. (1991) Conditions on Phonological Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, John. (1990) Phonological Government. Phonology Vol. 7, No. 2, (1990), 255-300.
Harris, John. (1994) English Sound Structure. Wiley-Blackwell.
Kaye, J. and Jean Lowenstamm (1984). De la syllabicité. In Forme Sonore du Langage, François Dell, Daniel Hirst & Jean-Roger Vergansu (eds.), 123-159. Paris: Hermann.
Kaye, J., J. Lowenstamm, and J-R. Vergnaud (1985) The Internal Structure of Phonological Elements: A Theory of Charm and Government, Phonology Yearbook 2, 305-328.
Kaye, J., J. Lowenstamm, and J-R. Vergnaud (1990) Constituent Structure and Government in Phonology. Phonology 7, 193-231.
Lowenstamm, J. (1996) CV as the only syllable type. In Current Trends in Phonology. Models and Methods, Jacques Durand and Bernard Laks (eds.),419-441. Salford, Manchester: ESRI.
Scheer, Tobias (2004). A lateral theory of phonology. Vol 1: What is CVCV, and why should it be? Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
|This phonology article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|