Gramm–Rudman–Hollings Balanced Budget Act
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2007)|
|Other short titles||Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Deficit Reduction Act of 1985|
|Long title||A joint resolution increasing the statutory limit on the public debt.|
|Nicknames||Gramm–Rudman–Hollings Balanced Budget Act|
|Enacted by||the 99th United States Congress|
|Effective||December 12, 1985|
|Statutes at Large||99 Stat. 1037|
|Acts amended||Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974|
|Titles amended||2 U.S.C.: Congress|
|U.S.C. sections amended||2 U.S.C. ch. 20 § 901|
The Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 and the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Reaffirmation Act of 1987 (both often known as Gramm-Rudman) were "the first binding spending constraints on the federal budget".
Provisions of Acts
The term "budget sequestration" was first used to describe a section of the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Deficit Reduction Act of 1985.
The Acts aimed to cut the United States federal budget deficit, which at the time, in dollar term, was the largest in history. The Acts provided for automatic spending cuts ("cancellation of budgetary resources", called "sequestration") if the total discretionary appropriations in various categories exceed in a fiscal year the budget spending thresholds. That is, if Congress enacts appropriation bills providing for discretionary outlays in each fiscal year that exceed the budget totals, unless Congress passes another budget resolution increasing the budget amount, an across-the-board spending cut in discretionary expenditure is automatically triggered on these categories, affecting all departments and programs by an equal percentage. The amount exceeding the limit is held back by the Treasury and not transferred to the agencies specified in the appropriation bills.
Under the 1985 Act, allowable deficit levels were calculated for the eventual elimination of the federal deficit. If the budget exceeded the allowable deficit, across-the-board cuts were required. Directors of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) were required to report to the Comptroller General regarding their recommendations for how much must be cut. The Comptroller General then evaluated these reports, made his own conclusion, and gave a recommendation to the President, who was then required to issue an order effecting the reductions required by the Comptroller General unless Congress made the required cuts by other ways within a specified amount of time.
The Comptroller General is nominated by the President from a list of three people recommended by the presiding officers of the House and Senate. He is removable only by impeachment or a joint resolution of Congress, which requires majority votes in both houses and is subject to a Presidential veto. Congress can give a number of reasons for this removal, including "inefficiency," "neglect of duty," or "malfeasance."
Passage of law
On August 12, 1986, Representative Dan Rostenkowski introduced the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Reaffirmation Act. The Senate passed the bill with two amendments by a vote of 36-35, and the House approved the Senate's first amendment by voice vote but rejected the second amendment. The Senate rescinded that amendment by voice vote and President Reagan signed the bill on August 21.
The process for determining the amount of the automatic cuts was found unconstitutional in the case of Bowsher v. Synar, (478 U.S. 714 (1986)) as an unconstitutional usurpation of executive power by Congress because the Comptroller General's function under the Act is the "very essence" of execution of the laws, which is beyond the power of a legislative body. It was noted: "Once Congress passes legislation, it can influence only its execution by passing new laws or through impeachment."
Congress enacted a reworked version of the law in the 1987 Act. Gramm-Rudman failed, however, to prevent large budget deficits.
Balanced budgets did not actually emerge until the late 1990s when budget surpluses (not accounting for liabilities to the Social Security Trust Fund) emerged. The budgets quickly fell out of balance after 2000 and have run consistent and substantial deficits since then.
- 99th Congress, S.1702, Pub.L. 99–177, title II, December 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 1038
- Pub.L. 100–119, title I, Sept. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 754, 2 U.S.C. § 900
- O'Keefe, Ed (November 20, 2012). "Warren Rudman’s legacy laid groundwork for ‘fiscal cliff’ negotiations". The Washington Post.
- 2 U.S.C. § 900 - Statement of budget enforcement through sequestration; definitions
- "A Glossary of Political Economy Terms". Department of Political Science, Auburn University. 2005. Retrieved November 6, 2012.
- "Bill Summary & Status, 99th Congress (1985 - 1986), H.J.RES.372, All Congressional Actions". THOMAS. Library of Congress. Retrieved December 17, 2010.
- "H.R.5395, All Congressional Actions". THOMAS. Library of Congress. Retrieved December 17, 2010.
- "H.J.RES.324 All Congressional Actions". THOMAS. Library of Congress. Retrieved December 17, 2010.
- "S.1702 - Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985". THOMAS. Library of Congress. September 25, 1985.
- William G. Dauster, Budget Process Law Annotated: 1993 Edition. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1993. ISBN 0-16-041726-0
- Margaret H. McDermott and Bernard D. Reams, Deficit Control and the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act: The Legislative History of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (P.L. 99-177) (W.S. Hein, 1986).
- "H.J.RES.372 - CRS Summary of Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985". THOMAS. Library of Congress. December 10, 1985.
- "Compliance Report For FY 1986:Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985" (PDF). U.S. GAO:Office of Public Affairs. U.S. Government Accountability Office. March 31, 1986. OCLC 13492627. External link in