Graph neural network

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A Graph neural network (GNN) is a class of artificial neural networks for processing data that can be represented as graphs.[1][2][3]

Basic building blocks of a Graph neural network (GNN). Permutation equivariant layer. Local pooling layer. Global pooling (or readout) layer. Colors indicate features.

In the more general subject of "Geometric Deep Learning", certain existing neural network architectures can be interpreted as GNNs operating on suitably defined graphs.[4] Convolutional neural networks, in the context of computer vision, can be seen as a GNN applied to graphs structured as grids of pixels. Transformers, in the context of natural language processing, can be seen as GNNs applied to complete graphs whose nodes are words in a sentence.

The key design element of GNNs is the use of pairwise message passing, such that graph nodes iteratively update their representations by exchanging information with their neighbors. Since their inception, several different GNN architectures have been proposed,[1][5][6][7] which implement different flavors of message passing.[4] As of 2022, whether it is possible to define GNN architectures "going beyond" message passing, or if every GNN can be built on message passing over suitably defined graphs, is an open research question.[8]

Relevant application domains for GNNs include social networks,[9] citation networks,[10] molecular biology,[11] chemistry,[12] physics[13] and NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems.[14]

Several open source libraries implementing graph neural networks are available, such as PyTorch Geometric[15] (PyTorch), TensorFlow GNN[16] (TensorFlow), and jraph[17] (Google JAX).

Architecture[edit]

The architecture of a generic GNN implements the following fundamental layers:[4]

  1. Permutation equivariant: a permutation equivariant layer maps a representation of a graph into an updated representation of the same graph. In the literature, permutation equivariant layers are implemented via pairwise message passing between graph nodes.[4][8] Intuitively, in a message passing layer, nodes update their representations by aggregating the messages received from their immediate neighbours. As such, each message passing layer increases the receptive field of the GNN by one hop.
  2. Local pooling: a local pooling layer coarsens the graph via downsampling. Local pooling is used to increase the receptive field of a GNN, in a similar fashion to pooling layers in convolutional neural networks. Examples include k-nearest neighbours pooling, top-k pooling,[18] and self-attention pooling.[19]
  3. Global pooling: a global pooling layer, also known as readout layer, provides fixed-size representation of the whole graph. The global pooling layer must be permutation invariant, such that permutations in the ordering of graph nodes and edges do not alter the final output.[20] Examples include element-wise sum, mean or maximum.

It has been demonstrated that GNNs cannot be more expressive than the Weisfeiler–Lehman Graph Isomorphism Test.[21][22] In practice, this means that there exist different graph structures (e.g., molecules with the same atoms but different bonds) that cannot be distinguished by GNNs. More powerful GNNs operating on higher-dimension geometries such as simplicial complexes can be designed.[23] As of 2022, whether or not future architectures will overcome the message passing primitive is an open research question.[8]

Non-isomorphic graphs that cannot be distinguished by a GNN due to the limitations of the Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Isomorphism Test. Colors indicate node features.

Message passing layers[edit]

Node representation update in a Message Passing Neural Network (MPNN) layer. Node receives messages sent by all of his immediate neighbours to . Messages are computing via the message function , which accounts for the features of both senders and receiver.

Message passing layers are permutation-equivariant layers mapping a graph into an updated representation of the same graph. Formally, they can be expressed as message passing neural networks (MPNNs).[4]

Let be a graph, where is the node set and is the edge set. Let be the neighbourhood of some node . Additionally, let be the features of node , and be the features of edge . An MPNN layer can be expressed as follows:[4]

where and are differentiable functions (e.g., artificial neural networks), and is a permutation invariant aggregation operator that can accept an arbitrary number of inputs (e.g., element-wise sum, mean, or max). In particular, and are referred to as update and message functions, respectively. Intuitively, in an MPNN computational block, graph nodes update their representations by aggregating the messages received from their neighbours.

The outputs of one or more MPNN layers are node representations for each node in the graph. Node representations can be employed for any downstream task, such as node/graph classification or edge prediction.

Graph nodes in an MPNN update their representation aggregating information from their immediate neighbours. As such, stacking MPNN layers means that one node will be able to communicate with nodes that are at most "hops" away. In principle, to ensure that every node receives information from every other node, one would need to stack a number of MPNN layers equal to the graph diameter. However, stacking many MPNN layers may cause issues such as oversmoothing[24] and oversquashing.[25] Oversmoothing refers to the issue of node representations becoming indistinguishable. Oversquashing refers to the bottleneck that is created by squeezing long-range dependencies into fixed-size representations. Countermeasures such as skip connections[6][26] (as in residual neural networks), gated update rules[27] and jumping knowledge[28] can mitigate oversmoothing. Modifying the final layer to be a fully-adjacent layer, i.e., by considering the graph as a complete graph, can mitigate oversquashing in problems where long-range dependencies are required.[25]

Other "flavours" of MPNN have been developed in the literature,[4] such as graph convolutional networks[5] and graph attention networks,[7] whose definitions can be expressed in terms of the MPNN formalism.

Graph convolutional network[edit]

The graph convolutional network (GCN) was first introduced by Thomas Kipf and Max Welling in 2017.[5]

A GCN layer defines a first-order approximation of a localized spectral filter on graphs. GCNs can be understood as a generalization of convolutional neural networks to graph-structured data.

The formal expression of a GCN layer reads as follows:

where is the matrix of node representations , is the matrix of node features , is an activation function (e.g., ReLU), is the graph adjacency matrix with the addition of self-loops, is the graph degree matrix with the addition of self-loops, and is a matrix of trainable parameters.

In particular, let be the graph adjacency matrix: then, one can define and , where denotes the identity matrix. This normalization ensures that the eigenvalues of are bounded in the range , avoiding numerical instabilities and exploding/vanishing gradients.

A limitation of GCNs is that they do not allow multidimensional edge features .[5] It is however possible to associate scalar weights to each edge by imposing , i.e., by setting each nonzero entry in the adjacency matrix equal to the weight of the corresponding edge.

Graph attention network[edit]

The graph attention network (GAT) was introduced by Petar Veličković et al. in 2018.[7]

Graph attention network is a combination of a graph neural network and an attention layer. The implementation of attention layer in graphical neural networks helps provide attention or focus to the important information from the data instead of focusing on the whole data.

A multi-head GAT layer can be expressed as follows:

where is the number of attention heads, denotes vector concatenation, is an activation function (e.g., ReLU), are attention coefficients, and is a matrix of trainable parameters for the -th attention head.

For the final GAT layer, the outputs from each attention head are averaged before the application of the activation function. Formally, the final GAT layer can be written as:

Attention in Machine Learning is a technique that mimics cognitive attention. In the context of learning on graphs, the attention coefficient measures how important is node to node .

Normalized attention coefficients are computed as follows:

where is a vector of learnable weights, indicates transposition, and is a modified ReLU activation function. Attention coefficients are normalized to make them easily comparable across different nodes.[7]

A GCN can be seen as a special case of a GAT where attention coefficients are not learnable, but fixed and equal to the edge weights .

Gated graph sequence neural network[edit]

The gated graph sequence neural network (GGS-NN) was introduced by Yujia Li et al. in 2015.[27] The GGS-NN extends the GNN formulation by Scarselli et al.[1] to output sequences. The message passing framework is implemented as an update rule to a gated recurrent unit (GRU) cell.

A GGS-NN can be expressed as follows:

where denotes vector concatenation, is a vector of zeros, is a matrix of learnable parameters, is a GRU cell, and denotes the sequence index. In a GGS-NN, the node representations are regarded as the hidden states of a GRU cell. The initial node features are zero-padded up to the hidden state dimension of the GRU cell. The same GRU cell is used for updating representations for each node.

Local pooling layers[edit]

Local pooling layers coarsen the graph via downsampling. We present here several learnable local pooling strategies that have been proposed.[20] For each cases, the input is the initial graph is represented by a matrix of node features, and the graph adjacency matrix . The output is the new matrix of node features, and the new graph adjacency matrix .

Top-k pooling[edit]

We first set

where is a learnable projection vector. The projection vector computes a scalar projection value for each graph node.

The top-k pooling layer [18] can then be formalised as follows:

where is the subset of nodes with the top-k highest projection scores, denotes element-wise matrix multiplication, and is the sigmoid function. In other words, the nodes with the top-k highest projection scores are retained in the new adjacency matrix . The operation makes the projection vector trainable by backpropagation, which otherwise would produce discrete outputs.[18]

Self-attention pooling[edit]

We first set

where is a generic permutation equivariant GNN layer (e.g., GCN, GAT, MPNN).

The Self-attention pooling layer [19] can then be formalised as follows:

where is the subset of nodes with the top-k highest projection scores, denotes element-wise matrix multiplication.

The self-attention pooling layer can be seen as an extension of the top-k pooling layer. Differently from top-k pooling, the self-attention scores computed in self-attention pooling account both for the graph features and the graph topology.

Applications[edit]

Protein folding[edit]

Graph neural networks are one of the main building blocks of AlphaFold, an artificial intelligence program developed by Google's DeepMind for solving the protein folding problem in biology. AlphaFold achieved first place in several CASP competitions.[29][30][28]

Social Networks[edit]

Social networks are a major application domain for GNNs due to their natural representation as social graphs. GNNs are used to develop recommender systems based on both social relations and item relations.[31][9]

Combinatorial optimization[edit]

GNNs are used as fundamental building blocks for several combinatorial optimization algorithms.[32] Examples include computing shortest paths or Eulerian circuits for a given graph,[27] deriving chip placements superior or competitive to handcrafted human solutions,[33] and improving expert-designed branching rules in Branch and Bound.[34]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Scarselli, Franco; Gori, Marco; Tsoi, Ah Chung; Hagenbuchner, Markus; Monfardini, Gabriele (2009). "The Graph Neural Network Model". IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. 20 (1): 61–80. doi:10.1109/TNN.2008.2005605. ISSN 1941-0093. PMID 19068426. S2CID 206756462.
  2. ^ Sanchez-Lengeling, Benjamin; Reif, Emily; Pearce, Adam; Wiltschko, Alex (2021-09-02). "A Gentle Introduction to Graph Neural Networks". Distill. 6 (9): e33. doi:10.23915/distill.00033. ISSN 2476-0757.
  3. ^ Daigavane, Ameya; Ravindran, Balaraman; Aggarwal, Gaurav (2021-09-02). "Understanding Convolutions on Graphs". Distill. 6 (9): e32. doi:10.23915/distill.00032. ISSN 2476-0757. S2CID 239678898.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Bronstein, Michael M.; Bruna, Joan; Cohen, Taco; Veličković, Petar (May 4, 2021). "Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs Geodesics and Gauges". arXiv:2104.13478 [cs.LG].
  5. ^ a b c d Kipf, Thomas N; Welling, Max (2016). "Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks". IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. 5 (1): 61–80. arXiv:1609.02907. doi:10.1109/TNN.2008.2005605. PMID 19068426. S2CID 206756462.
  6. ^ a b Hamilton, William; Ying, Rex; Leskovec, Jure (2017). "Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs" (PDF). Neural Information Processing Systems. 31. arXiv:1706.02216 – via Stanford.
  7. ^ a b c d Veličković, Petar; Cucurull, Guillem; Casanova, Arantxa; Romero, Adriana; Liò, Pietro; Bengio, Yoshua (2018-02-04). "Graph Attention Networks". arXiv:1710.10903 [stat.ML].
  8. ^ a b c Veličković, Petar (2022). "Message passing all the way up". arXiv:2202.11097 [cs.LG].
  9. ^ a b Ying, Rex; He, Ruining; Chen, Kaifeng; Eksombatchai, Pong; Hamilton, William L.; Leskovec, Jure (2018). Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systems. pp. 974–983. arXiv:1806.01973. doi:10.1145/3219819.3219890. ISBN 9781450355520. S2CID 46949657.
  10. ^ "Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection". snap.stanford.edu. Retrieved 2021-07-05.
  11. ^ Gilmer, Justin; Schoenholz, Samuel S.; Riley, Patrick F.; Vinyals, Oriol; Dahl, George E. (2017-07-17). "Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry". Proceedings of Machine Learning Research: 1263–1272. arXiv:1704.01212.
  12. ^ Coley, Connor W.; Jin, Wengong; Rogers, Luke; Jamison, Timothy F.; Jaakkola, Tommi S.; Green, William H.; Barzilay, Regina; Jensen, Klavs F. (2019-01-02). "A graph-convolutional neural network model for the prediction of chemical reactivity". Chemical Science. 10 (2): 370–377. doi:10.1039/C8SC04228D. ISSN 2041-6539.
  13. ^ Qasim, Shah Rukh; Kieseler, Jan; Iiyama, Yutaro; Pierini, Maurizio Pierini (2019). "Learning representations of irregular particle-detector geometry with distance-weighted graph networks". The European Physical Journal C. 79 (7). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7113-9. S2CID 88518244.
  14. ^ Li, Zhuwen; Chen, Qifeng; Koltun, Vladlen (2018). "Combinatorial optimization with graph convolutional networks and guided tree search". Neural Information Processing Systems. 31: 537–546. arXiv:1810.10659.
  15. ^ Matthias, Fey; Lenssen, Jan E. (2019). "Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometric". arXiv:1903.02428 [cs.LG].
  16. ^ "Tensorflow GNN". GitHub. Retrieved 30 June 2022.
  17. ^ "jraph". GitHub. Retrieved 30 June 2022.
  18. ^ a b c Gao, Hongyang; Ji, Shuiwang Ji (2019). "Graph U-Nets". arXiv:1905.05178 [cs.LG].
  19. ^ a b Lee, Junhyun; Lee, Inyeop; Kang, Jaewoo (2019). "Self-Attention Graph Pooling". arXiv:1904.08082 [cs.LG].
  20. ^ a b Liu, Chuang; Zhan, Yibing; Li, Chang; Du, Bo; Wu, Jia; Hu, Wenbin; Liu, Tongliang; Tao, Dacheng (2022). "Graph Pooling for Graph Neural Networks: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities". arXiv:2204.07321 [cs.LG].
  21. ^ Douglas, B. L. (2011-01-27). "The Weisfeiler–Lehman Method and Graph Isomorphism Testing". arXiv:1101.5211 [math.CO].
  22. ^ Xu, Keyulu; Hu, Weihua; Leskovec, Jure; Jegelka, Stefanie (2019-02-22). "How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?". arXiv:1810.00826 [cs.LG].
  23. ^ Bodnar, Christian; Frasca, Fabrizio; Guang Wang, Yu; Otter, Nina; Montúfar, Guido; Liò, Pietro; Bronstein, Michael (2021). "Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Topological: Message Passing Simplicial Networks". arXiv:2103.03212 [cs.LG].
  24. ^ Chen, Deli; Lin, Yankai; Li, Wei; Li, Peng; Zhou, Jie; Sun, Xu (2020). "Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological View". Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 34 (4): 3438–3445. arXiv:1909.03211. doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5747. S2CID 202539008.
  25. ^ a b Alon, Uri; Yahav, Eran (2021). "On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implications". arXiv:2006.05205 [cs.LG].
  26. ^ Xu, Keyulu; Zhang, Mozhi; Jegelka, Stephanie; Kawaguchi, Kenji (2021). "Optimization of Graph Neural Networks: Implicit Acceleration by Skip Connections and More Depth". arXiv:2105.04550 [cs.LG].
  27. ^ a b c Li, Yujia; Tarlow, Daniel; Brockschmidt, Mark; Zemel, Richard (2016). "Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networks". arXiv:1511.05493 [cs.LG].
  28. ^ a b Xu, Keyulu; Li, Chengtao; Tian, Yonglong; Sonobe, Tomohiro; Kawarabayashi, Ken-ichi; Jegelka, Stefanie (2018). "Representation Learning on Graphs with Jumping Knowledge Networks". arXiv:1806.03536 [cs.LG].
  29. ^ Sample, Ian (2 December 2018). "Google's DeepMind predicts 3D shapes of proteins". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
  30. ^ "DeepMind's protein-folding AI has solved a 50-year-old grand challenge of biology". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
  31. ^ Fan, Wenqi; Ma, Yao; Li, Qing; He, Yuan; Zhao, Eric; Tang, Jiliang; Yin, Dawei (2019). Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendation. pp. 417–426. arXiv:1902.07243. doi:10.1145/3308558.3313488. hdl:10397/81232. ISBN 9781450366748. S2CID 67769538.
  32. ^ Cappart, Quentin; Chételat, Didier; Khalil, Elias; Lodi, Andrea; Morris, Christopher; Veličković, Petar (2021). "Combinatorial optimization and reasoning with graph neural networks". arXiv:2102.09544 [cs.LG].
  33. ^ Mirhoseini, Azalia; Goldie, Anna; Yazgan, Mustafa; Jiang, Joe Wenjie; Songhori, Ebrahim; Wang, Shen; Lee, Young-Joon; Johnson, Eric; Pathak, Omkar; Nazi, Azade; Pak, Jiwoo; Tong, Andy; Srinivasa, Kavya; Hang, William; Tuncer, Emre; Le, Quoc V.; Laudon, James; Ho, Richard; Carpenter, Roger; Dean, Jeff (2021). "A graph placement methodology for fast chip design". Nature. 594 (7862): 207–212. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03544-w. PMID 34108699. S2CID 235395490.
  34. ^ Gasse, Maxime; Chételat, Didier; Ferroni, Nicola; Charlin, Laurent; Lodi, Andrea (2019). "Exact Combinatorial Optimization with Graph Convolutional Neural Networks". arXiv:1906.01629 [cs.LG].

External Link[edit]

https://distill.pub/2021/gnn-intro/