Illegal taxicab operation
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Illegal taxicabs, sometimes known as gypsy cabs[nb 1], are taxicabs and other for-hire vehicles that are not duly licensed or permitted by the jurisdiction in which they operate. Most major cities of the United States and worldwide require taxicabs to be licensed, safety-inspected, insured as for-hire vehicles and use taxi meters and there may also be requirements that the taxi driver be registered or accredited. However, many unlicensed cabs are in operation. Illegal cabs may be marked taxi vehicles (sometimes referred to as "speedy cabs"), and others are personal vehicles used by an individual to offer unauthorized taxi-like services. Illegal cabs are prevalent in cities with medallion systems, which restrict the number of legal cabs in operation. Since their introduction in 2009, Uber taxis, which are crowd-sourced smartphone-enabled unlicensed taxis, have been classified as illegal taxicabs in some jurisdictions.
A variety of terms are used in the industry to describe legal and illegal transportation providers. Hacks or Hackers is a common term that originated with the hackney horse, a breed of horse typically offered for hire in the 19th century. Other terms used are livery cab, car service, or jitney cab.
The phrases vary by locality and often refer to different classes of licensed transportation providers. For example, in Philadelphia a cab driver's license is called a hacker's license, while in New York City livery cabs are licensed for telephone dispatch only.
In mainland China, illegal cabs are referred to as "black taxies" or "black cars" (黑车)
In Lagos, Nigeria, illegal cabs are usually referred to as "Kabu kabu".
In Mexico, illegal taxicabs are called taxi pirata (pirate taxi)
In Trinidad and Tobago illegal taxis are referred to as "PH" cars. This is because of the coding used on licence plates to distinguish between private cars from taxis. On a private car's licence plate, the number begins with a "P" (for private) while on taxis the license plates begin with an "H" (for hired). Thus the slang "PH" indicates an informal blend of the two states.
Types and exceptions
Unlicensed cabs may be found cruising the residential streets of a city, typically in the working-class neighborhoods. Sometimes, drivers will also wait at a location where taxi service is in demand, such as airport or train station arrival areas or shopping centers, asking arriving passengers if they need a ride. Unlicensed taxis often do not have meters, so the fare is usually agreed to at the beginning of the ride. The car itself is usually large, similar in feel to a licensed taxi.
In New York City and some other cities, non-medallion car services (also called livery cabs) lawfully exist but are only supposed to respond to telephone dispatch. They cannot legally pick up street hails or enter taxi stands at airports. However, outside of the core Manhattan business district, livery cabs are ubiquitous and will respond to street hails. Some areas also have sedan services, which likewise respond to telephone dispatch.
There are also non-taxicab based unlicensed transportation providers. Examples include "dollar vans" plying city bus routes in New York City, and van services that offer rides between major cities. In some places, providing a ride in a personal vehicle as a part of another job, such as caregiving, may be legal, sometimes with regulation of certain factors, such as insurance coverage.
In some large American cities, and in Hong Kong, a medallion system is used to license cabs. The city issues a fixed number of medallions, and only medallion taxis are allowed to pick up fares. In general, this leads to medallions becoming ever more expensive—a New York City corporate medallion can sell for up to $1 million each. Medallions are transferable, and while some cab drivers own their own medallion, most must lease one on a daily or weekly basis from a fleet owner.
The medallion system has several effects upon the illegal transportation market. By acting as a barrier to entry to the taxi market, it has the unintended consequence of creating a market for unlicensed cabs, especially in areas that tend to be underserved by medallion cabs. Taxi medallions tend to increase in value over time, and their owners and lessees tend to be very eager to protect their exclusive rights, for example, by lobbying for stricter enforcement against unlicensed cabs.
In working-class neighborhoods
In America, there is significant anecdotal evidence that unlicensed cabs are mostly found in working-class neighborhoods of large cities. There are likely several reasons for this. First is a lack of licensed taxis in these areas—due to the perception, by cab drivers, of safety issues or that better tips can be had in wealthier neighborhoods. Often due to expensive medallions, licensed taxis don't leave the Central Business District (CBD), except to go to airports to drop off or pick up customers, which are easy and guaranteed income. If a metropolitan area is made of islands and depends on bridges and tunnels, and the CBD is a particular island, there is great psychological pressure to the licensed taxi driver to not leave that CBD island except for airports—even if the destination is a wealthy neighborhood—for fear of inability to obtain a return fare, safety concerns, or reliability of an outer-island customer paying his bill at the end of the journey.
Eventually, a precedent forms wherein customers will never find a licensed taxi in outer areas, causing licensed drivers to expect difficulty finding customers for a return trip, and wherein customers will wait for the first unlicensed cab or public transport rather than wait indefinitely for a licensed cab. Eventually drivers may form informal patrol zones corresponding to licensed and unlicensed taxis. Compounding this, residents of outer neighborhoods often own fewer cars per capita and thus are more dependent on publicly available transportation.
Moreover, residents of such neighborhoods may favor unlicensed cabs even if licensed taxis are available. Metered fares usually include a rate pertaining to the duration of a trip; as such, in areas where traffic congestion is common and unpredictable, the duration component of a licensed trip can skyrocket a fare beyond customer expectation. In contrast, unlicensed fares are known in advance, eliminating customer fears of unexpected cost.
It is not uncommon for residents and drivers to develop long-term relationships, wherein a customer comes to rely on a specific driver, using him regularly to commute to work or go shopping.
In Baltimore, USA, supermarkets in working-class neighborhoods frequently have "courtesy drivers" who, although not employed by the supermarket, have shown identification to management and are allowed to wait in front of the store for fares. Unlike licensed cab drivers, these courtesy drivers will also help to carry groceries up to one's apartment. "Hacking" in Baltimore has grown grass-roots style to a region-wide phenomenon, originating from "Hack Clubs", organizations usually operating in converted rowhouses where "hacks" made their cars available, distributed business cards with a central number, employed a "dispatcher", and hung around the rowhouse waiting in line for calls. This practice continues today, but hacking has evolved to the point where people nowadays just wag a finger toward the street, and wait for anyone to stop. This new way of getting around remains popular, despite being potentially dangerous, due to disillusionment with the city transit service, and the fact that licensed cabs seldom stop for fares in the most dangerous parts of town. There are plenty of willing drivers, and competition can be fierce. The fare is negotiated and paid upfront. Police maintain this is illegal, and sometimes enforce with $500 tickets, and a trip to the courthouse. However, hacking is so prevalent in certain parts of town that cops don't bother making traffic stops.
Unlicensed cabs are also found among the Amish of rural Pennsylvania. An Amish taxi is typically an illegal taxicab operation run on an informal basis by an individual who is not specifically running a taxi service, but who has been propositioned by an Amish person to transport them for shopping or business purposes. Old Order Amish do not drive, but will hire a van or taxi for trips for which they cannot use their traditional horse and buggy transportation.
In most rural locations with a low-density Amish population, it would be impractical for an Amish person to hire a commercial taxi from a metropolitan area since the taxi would have to drive long distances just to pick up the Amish person. It is therefore more convenient and less expensive to find an unlicensed non-Amish neighbor willing to act as a "taxi".
Normal individual automotive insurance is not intended to insure driving a vehicle for hire for business purposes. A paratransit license from the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) is required to operate an Amish Taxi legally in Pennsylvania. This applies to anyone who transports people for a fee. The vehicle cannot hold more than 15 passengers, and must display a PUC identification number on both sides of the vehicle.
Crowdsourced taxis are run by companies like Lyft, Uber, and Sidecar. These companies develop, market, and operate the mobile apps, which allows consumers to submit a trip request which is then routed to sharing economy drivers. As of May 28, 2015, Uber alone offered the service in 58 countries and 300 cities worldwide. Since Uber's launch, several other companies have emulated its business model, a trend that has come to be referred to as "Uberification".
Many governments and taxi companies have protested against Uber, alleging that its use of unlicensed, crowd-sourced drivers was unsafe and illegal. It is estimated that Uber will generate 10 billion dollars in revenue by the end of 2015.
- Randall, Kay. "What's in a Name? Professor take on roles of Romani activist and spokesperson to improve plight of their ethnic group". Retrieved 30 January 2013.
- Weyrauch, Walter Otto (2001). Gypsy law: Romani legal traditions and culture Check
|url=value (help). University of California Press. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-520-22186-4.
- Bhopal, Kalwant; Myers, Martin (2008). Insiders, Outsiders and Others: Gypsies and Identity. Univ of Hertfordshire Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-1-902806-71-6. Retrieved 2010-05-20.
- Klímová-Alexander, Ilona (2005). The Romani voice in world politics: the United Nations and non-state actors. Non-state actors in international law. Ashgate. p. 31. ISBN 978-0-7546-4173-5. Retrieved 2010-05-20.
- Tebbutt, Susan (1998). Sinti and roma: gypsies in german-speaking society and literature. Oxford: Berghahn. p. x. ISBN 1-57181921-5.
- Liégeois, Jean-Pierre (2007). Roma in Europe (3rd ed.). Strasbourg: Council of Europe. p. 159. ISBN 928716051-1.
- Totten, Samuel; Jacobs, Paul R. Bartrop; Leonard, Steven (2008). Dictionary of genocide. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. p. 371. ISBN 0-31332967-2.
- American Heritage Dictionary: hack (heading 2, definition 5)
- The new Partridge dictionary of slang and unconventional English (Reprint. ed.). London [u.a.]: Routledge. 2007. p. 943. ISBN 0415259371.
|last1=in Authors list (help)
- Merriam-Webster's pocket guide to English usage. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster. 1998. p. 178. ISBN 0877795142.
- Garner, Bryan A. (2009). Garner's modern American usage (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 405. ISBN 0195382757.
- Baskin, [by] H.E. Wedeck with the assistance of Wade. Dictionary of gypsy life and lore. New York: Philosophical Library. ISBN 0806529857.
- Garner, Bryan A. A dictionary of modern legal usage (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 400. ISBN 0195384202.
- Dictionary of race, ethnicity and culture (1. publ., [Nachdr.]. ed.). London: Sage. 2002. p. 291. ISBN 0761969004.
|last1=in Authors list (help)
- Mohamad Fahd Rahmat (7 January 2011). "Prebet sapu makin ligat" (in Malay). Berita Harian. Retrieved 23 January 2013.
- Pedersen, Erik André (2 March 2009). "Kjørte pirattaxi - mistet lappen". Fredriksstads Blad (in Norwegian). Retrieved 4 January 2010.
- "Pirate taxis cruise streets". Copenhagen Post. 3 April 2007. Retrieved 23 September 2012.
- Michael M. Grynbaum (October 20, 2011). "2 Taxi Medallions Sell for $1 Million Each". City Room (blog). The New York Times.
- "Feature: A Baltimore Way of Life". 2004-04-21.
- Pa. Officials Cracking Down on Unlicensed 'Amish Taxis'
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission press release January 10, 2005.
- Rusli, Evelyn (June 6, 2014). "Uber Dispatches trips". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
- Goode, Lauren (June 17, 2011). "Worth It? An App to Get a Cab". The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company.
- "Where is Uber Currently Available?". Uber.com. Retrieved May 26, 2015.
- "AMMAN, YOU ARE UBER'S 300TH CITY!". Uber.com. Retrieved May 26, 2015.
- "Apple Pay's Real Killer App: The Uber-ification of Local Services". Huffington Post. Retrieved January 5, 2015.
- "Uberification of the US Service Economy". Schlaf. Retrieved January 5, 2014.
- Shontell, Alyson (15 November 2014). "Uber Is Generating A Staggering Amount Of Revenue". Business Insider. Retrieved 25 May 2015.