In the mathematical field of graph theory, a Hamiltonian path (or traceable path) is a path in an undirected or directed graph that visits each vertex exactly once. A Hamiltonian cycle (or Hamiltonian circuit) is a Hamiltonian path that is a cycle. Determining whether such paths and cycles exist in graphs is the Hamiltonian path problem, which is NP-complete.
Hamiltonian paths and cycles are named after William Rowan Hamilton who invented the icosian game, now also known as Hamilton's puzzle, which involves finding a Hamiltonian cycle in the edge graph of the dodecahedron. Hamilton solved this problem using the icosian calculus, an algebraic structure based on roots of unity with many similarities to the quaternions (also invented by Hamilton). This solution does not generalize to arbitrary graphs.
Despite being named after Hamilton, Hamiltonian cycles in polyhedra had also been studied a year earlier by Thomas Kirkman, who, in particular, gave an example of a polyhedron without Hamiltonian cycles. Even earlier, Hamiltonian cycles and paths in the knight's graph of the chessboard, the knight's tour, had been studied in the 9th century in Indian mathematics by Rudrata, and around the same time in Islamic mathematics by al-Adli ar-Rumi. In 18th century Europe, knight's tours were published by Abraham de Moivre and Leonhard Euler.
A Hamiltonian path or traceable path is a path that visits each vertex of the graph exactly once. A graph that contains a Hamiltonian path is called a traceable graph. A graph is Hamiltonian-connected if for every pair of vertices there is a Hamiltonian path between the two vertices.
A Hamiltonian cycle, Hamiltonian circuit, vertex tour or graph cycle is a cycle that visits each vertex exactly once (except for the vertex that is both the start and end, which is visited twice). A graph that contains a Hamiltonian cycle is called a Hamiltonian graph.
Similar notions may be defined for directed graphs, where each edge (arc) of a path or cycle can only be traced in a single direction (i.e., the vertices are connected with arrows and the edges traced "tail-to-head").
A Hamiltonian decomposition is an edge decomposition of a graph into Hamiltonian circuits.
- a complete graph with more than two vertices is Hamiltonian
- every cycle graph is Hamiltonian
- every tournament has an odd number of Hamiltonian paths (Rédei 1934)
- every platonic solid, considered as a graph, is Hamiltonian
- the Cayley graph of a finite Coxeter group is Hamiltonian (For more information on Hamiltonian paths in Cayley graphs, see the Lovász conjecture)
Any Hamiltonian cycle can be converted to a Hamiltonian path by removing one of its edges, but a Hamiltonian path can be extended to Hamiltonian cycle only if its endpoints are adjacent.
An Eulerian graph G (a connected graph in which every vertex has even degree) necessarily has an Euler tour, a closed walk passing through each edge of G exactly once. This tour corresponds to a Hamiltonian cycle in the line graph L(G), so the line graph of every Eulerian graph is Hamiltonian. Line graphs may have other Hamiltonian cycles that do not correspond to Euler tours, and in particular the line graph L(G) of every Hamiltonian graph G is itself Hamiltonian, regardless of whether the graph G is Eulerian.
The number of different Hamiltonian cycles in a complete undirected graph on n vertices is (n − 1)! / 2 and in a complete directed graph on n vertices is (n − 1)!. These counts assume that cycles that are the same apart from their starting point are not counted separately.
The best vertex degree characterization of Hamiltonian graphs was provided in 1972 by the Bondy–Chvátal theorem, which generalizes earlier results by G. A. Dirac (1952) and Øystein Ore. Both Dirac's and Ore's theorems can also be derived from Pósa's theorem (1962). Hamiltonicity has been widely studied with relation to various parameters such as graph density, toughness, forbidden subgraphs and distance among other parameters. Dirac and Ore's theorems basically state that a graph is Hamiltonian if it has enough edges.
Bondy–Chvátal theorem operates on the closure cl(G) of a graph G with n vertices, obtained by repeatedly adding a new edge uv connecting a nonadjacent pair of vertices u and v with degree(v) + degree(u) ≥ n until no more pairs with this property can be found.
- A graph is Hamiltonian if and only if its closure is Hamiltonian.
As complete graphs are Hamiltonian, all graphs whose closure is complete are Hamiltonian, which is the content of the following earlier theorems by Dirac and Ore.
- A simple graph with n vertices (n ≥ 3) is Hamiltonian if every vertex has degree n / 2 or greater.
- A graph with n vertices (n ≥ 3) is Hamiltonian if, for every pair of non-adjacent vertices, the sum of their degrees is n or greater (see Ore's theorem).
The following theorems can be regarded as directed versions:
- A strongly connected simple directed graph with n vertices is Hamiltonian if every vertex has a full degree greater than or equal to n.
- A strongly connected simple directed graph with n vertices is Hamiltonian if the sum of full degrees of every pair of distinct non-adjacent vertices is greater than or equal to 2n − 1.
The number of vertices must be doubled because each undirected edge corresponds to two directed arcs and thus the degree of a vertex in the directed graph is twice the degree in the undirected graph.
- A simple graph with n vertices has a Hamiltonian path if, for every non-adjacent vertex pairs the sum of their degrees and their shortest path length is greater than n.
The above theorem can only recognize the existence of a Hamiltonian path in a graph and not a Hamiltonian Cycle. A similar sufficiency condition for Hamiltonian cycles is introduced by Kaykobad. It follows-
- A simple biconnected graph with n vertices is Hamiltonian if, for every non-adjacent vertex pair the sum of their degrees and their shortest path length is greater than or equal to n+1 with strict inequality holding for at least one pair of vertices.
Many of these results have analogues for balanced bipartite graphs, in which the vertex degrees are compared to the number of vertices on a single side of the bipartition rather than the number of vertices in the whole graph.
Existence of Hamiltonian cycles in planar graphs
- Theorem (Whitney, 1931)
- A 4-connected planar triangulation has a Hamiltonian cycle.
- Theorem (Tutte, 1956)
- A 4-connected planar graph has a Hamiltonian cycle.
- Barnette's conjecture, an open problem on Hamiltonicity of cubic bipartite polyhedral graphs
- Eulerian path, a path through all edges in a graph
- Fleischner's theorem, on Hamiltonian squares of graphs
- Grinberg's theorem giving a necessary condition for planar graphs to have a Hamiltonian cycle
- Hamiltonian path problem, the computational problem of finding Hamiltonian paths
- Hypohamiltonian graph, a non-Hamiltonian graph in which every vertex-deleted subgraph is Hamiltonian
- Knight's tour, a Hamiltonian cycle in the knight's graph
- LCF notation for Hamiltonian cubic graphs.
- Lovász conjecture that vertex-transitive graphs are Hamiltonian
- Pancyclic graph, graphs with cycles of all lengths including a Hamiltonian cycle
- Shortness exponent, a numerical measure of how far from Hamiltonian the graphs in a family can be
- Snake-in-the-box, the longest induced path in a hypercube
- Steinhaus–Johnson–Trotter algorithm for finding a Hamiltonian path in a permutohedron
- Subhamiltonian graph, a subgraph of a planar Hamiltonian graph
- Tait's conjecture (now known false) that 3-regular polyhedral graphs are Hamiltonian
- Travelling salesman problem
- Gray code
- Biggs, N. L. (1981), "T. P. Kirkman, mathematician", The Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 13 (2): 97–120, doi:10.1112/blms/13.2.97, MR 0608093.
- Watkins, John J. (2004), "Chapter 2: Knight's Tours", Across the Board: The Mathematics of Chessboard Problems, Princeton University Press, pp. 25–38, ISBN 978-0-691-15498-5.
- Gardner, M. "Mathematical Games: About the Remarkable Similarity between the Icosian Game and the Towers of Hanoi." Sci. Amer. 196, 150–156, May 1957
- Eric Weinstein. "Biconnected Graph". Wolfram MathWorld.
- Balakrishnan, R.; Ranganathan, K. (2012), "Corollary 6.5.5", A Textbook of Graph Theory, Springer, p. 134, ISBN 9781461445296.
- Gould, Ronald J. (July 8, 2002). "Advances on the Hamiltonian Problem - A Survey" (PDF). Emory University. Retrieved 2012-12-10.
- Rahman, M. S.; Kaykobad, M. (April 2005). "On Hamiltonian cycles and Hamiltonian paths". Information Processing Letters. 94: 37–41. doi:10.1016/j.ipl.2004.12.002.
- Kaykobad, Tanvir; Kaykobad, M. (2015-12-10). "Hamiltonicity Revisited". Retrieved 2015-12-10.
- Moon, J.; Moser, L. (1963), "On Hamiltonian bipartite graphs", Israel Journal of Mathematics, 1: 163–165, doi:10.1007/BF02759704, MR 0161332
- Berge, Claude; Ghouila-Houiri, A. (1962), Programming, games and transportation networks, New York: Sons, Inc.
- DeLeon, Melissa (2000), "A study of sufficient conditions for Hamiltonian cycles" (PDF), Rose-Hulman Undergraduate Math Journal, 1 (1).
- Dirac, G. A. (1952), "Some theorems on abstract graphs", Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 3rd Ser., 2: 69–81, doi:10.1112/plms/s3-2.1.69, MR 0047308.
- Hamilton, William Rowan (1856), "Memorandum respecting a new system of roots of unity", Philosophical Magazine, 12: 446.
- Hamilton, William Rowan (1858), "Account of the Icosian Calculus", Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 6: 415–416.
- Meyniel, M. (1973), "Une condition suffisante d'existence d'un circuit hamiltonien dans un graphe orienté", Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 14 (2): 137–147, doi:10.1016/0095-8956(73)90057-9, MR 0317997.
- Ore, Øystein (1960), "Note on Hamilton circuits", The American Mathematical Monthly, 67: 55, doi:10.2307/2308928, JSTOR 2308928, MR 0118683.
- Pósa, L. (1962), "A theorem concerning Hamilton lines", Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl., 7: 225–226, MR 0184876.
- Whitney, Hassler (1931), "A theorem on graphs", Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, 32 (2): 378–390, doi:10.2307/1968197, MR 1503003.
- Tutte, W. T. (1956), "A theorem on planar graphs", Trans. American Math. Soc., 82: 99–116, doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-1956-0081471-8.