Health impact assessment
Health impact assessment (HIA) is defined as "a combination of procedures, methods, and tools by which a policy, program, or project may be judged as to its potential effects on the health of a population, and the distribution of those effects within the population." (ECHP 1999, p. 4)
- 1 Overview
- 2 Determinants of health
- 3 Levels of HIA
- 4 HIA practitioners
- 5 HIA worldwide
- 6 HIA conferences
- 7 See also
- 8 References
- 9 Further reading
- 10 External links
HIA is intended to produce a set of evidence-based recommendations to inform decision-making (Taylor & Quigley 2002, p. 2). HIA seeks to maximise the positive health impacts and minimise the negative health impacts of proposed policies, programs or projects.
The procedures of HIA are similar to those used in other forms of impact assessment, such as environmental impact assessment or social impact assessment. HIA is usually described as following the steps listed, though many practitioners break these into sub-steps or label them differently:
- Screening - determining if an HIA is warranted/required
- Scoping - determining which impacts will be considered and the plan for the HIA
- Identification and assessment of impacts - determining the magnitude, nature, extent and likelihood of potential health impacts, using a variety of different methods and types of information
- Decision-making and recommendations - making explicit the trade-offs to be made in decision-making and formulating evidence-informed recommendations
- Evaluation, monitoring and follow-up - process and impact evaluation of the HIA and the monitoring and management of health impacts
The main objective of HIA is to apply existing knowledge and evidence about health impacts, to specific social and community contexts, to develop evidence-based recommendations that inform decision-making in order to protect and improve community health and wellbeing. Because of financial and time constraints, HIAs do not generally involve new research or the generation of original scientific knowledge. However, the findings of HIAs, especially where these have been monitored and evaluated over time, can be used to inform other HIAs in contexts that are similar. An HIA's recommendations may focus on both design and operational aspects of a proposal.
A number of manuals and guidelines for HIA's use have been developed (see further reading).
Determinants of health
The proposition that policies, programs and projects have the potential to change the determinants of health underpins HIA's use. Changes to health determinants then leads to changes in health outcomes or the health status of individuals and communities. The determinants of health are largely environmental and social, so that there are many overlaps with environmental impact assessment and social impact assessment.
Levels of HIA
Three forms of HIA exist:
- Desk-based HIA, which takes 2–6 weeks for one assessor to complete and provides a broad overview of potential health impacts;
- Rapid HIA, which takes approximately 12 weeks for one assessor to complete and provides more detailed information on potential health impacts; and
- Comprehensive HIA, which takes approximately 6 months for one assessor and provides a in-depth assessment of potential health impacts. (IMPACT 2004, p. 7)
It has been suggested that HIAs can be prospective (done before a proposal is implemented), concurrent (done while the proposal is being implemented) or retrospective (done after a proposal has been implemented) (Taylor, Gorman & Quigley 2003, p. 1). This remains controversial, however, with a number of HIA practitioners suggesting that concurrent HIA is better regarded as a monitoring activity and that retrospective HIA is more akin to evaluation with a health focus, rather than being assessment per se (Kemm 2003, p. 387). Prospective HIA is preferred as it allows the maximum practical opportunity to influence decision-making and subsequent health impacts.
HIA practitioners can be found in the private and public sectors, but are relatively few in number. There are no universally accepted competency frameworks or certification processes. It is suggested that a lead practitioner should have extensive education and training in a health related field, experience of participating in HIAs, and have attended an HIA training course. It has been suggested and widely accepted that merely having a medical or health degree should not be regarded as an indication of competency.
The new safeguard policies and standards of the International Finance Corporation (IFC), part of the World Bank, were established in 2006. These contain a requirement for health impact assessment in large projects. The standards have been accepted by most of the leading lending banks who are parties to the Equator Principles. Health impact assessments are becoming routine in many large development projects in both public and private sectors of developing countries. There is also a long history of health impact assessment in the water resource development sector - large dams and irrigation systems.
- Impact Assessment
- Health promotion
- Health protection
- Population health
- Acheson, D (1998), Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health, London: Stationery Office.
- ECHP (1999), Health Impact Assessment: Main concepts and suggested approach (Gothenburg Consensus Paper) (PDF), Brussels: European Centre for Health Policy.
- IMPACT (2004), European Policy Health Impact Assessment: A guide (PDF), Liverpool.
- Kemm, J (2003), "Perspectives on Health Impact Assessment" (PDF), Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81 (2): 387.
- Taylor, L; Gorman, N; Quigley, R (2003), Evaluating Health Impact Assessment: Learning from practice bulletin (PDF), London: Health Development Agency.
- Taylor, L; Quigley, R (2002), Health Impact Assessment: A review of reviews, London: Health Development Agency.
This page uses Harvard referencing. References are sorted alphabetically by author surname.
Books and edited book chapters
- Ross, C., Orenstein, M., & Botchwey, N (2014), Health Impact Assessment in the United States, New York: Springer, ISBN 978-1-4614-7303-9
- Kemm, J (2013), Health Impact Assessment: Past Achievement, Current Understanding, and Future Progress, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-965601-1.
- Ståhl, T; Wismar, M; Ollila, E; Lahtinen, E; Leppo, K (2006), Health in All Policies: Prospects and potentials (PDF), Helsinki: Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, ISBN 978-952-00-1964-8. Includes several chapters on HIA.
- Kemm, J; Parry, J; Palmer, S (2004), Health Impact Assessment: Concepts, theory, techniques and applications, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-852629-2.
- Birley, M (1995), The Health Impact Assessment of Development Projects, London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
- Birley, M (2011), Health Impact Assessment: principles and practice, London: Earthscan.
- Harris-Roxas, Ben; Harris, Elizabeth (2010), "Differing Forms, Differing Purposes: A Typology of Health Impact Assessment", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31 (4): 396–403, doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2010.03.003.
- Bhatia, Rajiv; Wernham, Aaron (2008), "Integrating human health into environmental impact assessment: An unrealized opportunity for environmental health and justice", Environmental Health Perspectives, 116 (8): 991–1000, doi:10.1289/ehp.11132, PMC 2516559, PMID 18709140.
- Dannenberg, AL; Bhatia, R; Cole, BL; Heaton, SK; Feldman, JD; Rutt, CD (2008), "Use of Health Impact Assessment in the US: 27 Case Studies, 1999-2007" (PDF), American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34 (3): 241–256, doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.11.015, PMID 18312813.
- Harris-Roxas, BF; Harris, PJ (2007), "Learning by Doing: The value of case studies of health impact assessment", NSW Public Health Bulletin, 18 (9–10): 161–163, doi:10.1071/NB07110, PMID 17949583
- Birley, M (2005), "Health Impact Assessment in Multinational Corporations: A case study of Shell", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25 (7–8): 702–713, doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.001.
- Birley, Martin (2003), "Health Impact Assessment, integration and critical appraisal", Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21 (4): 313–321, doi:10.3152/147154603781766158
- Krieger, N; Northridge, M; Gruskin, S; Quinn, M; Kriebel, D; Davey Smith, G; Bassett, M; Rehkopf, DH; et al. (2003), "Assessing Health Impact Assessment: Multidisciplinary and international perspectives", Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57 (9): 659–662, doi:10.1136/jech.57.9.659, PMC 1732566, PMID 12933768.
- Douglas, MJ; Conway, L; Gorman, D; Gavin, S; Hanlon, P (2001), "Achieving Better Health Through Health Impact Assessment", Health Bulletin, 59 (5): 300–305, PMID 12664743.
- Mittelmark, MB (2001), "Promoting Social Responsibility for Health: Health impact assessment and healthy public policy at the community level", Health Promotion International, 16 (3): 269–274, doi:10.1093/heapro/16.3.269, PMID 11509463.
- Scott-Samuel, A (1996), "Health Impact Assessment: An idea whose time has come (editorial)", British Medical Journal, 313 (7051): 183–184, doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7051.183, PMC 2351622, PMID 8696181.
Journal special issues
- New South Wales Department of Health (2007), "HIA in Urban Settings Special Issue", NSW Public Health Bulletin, 18 (9–10).
- New Zealand Ministry of Social Development (2006), "HIA in New Zealand Special Issue", Social Policy Journal of New Zealand (29).
- New South Wales Department of Health (2005), "HIA Special Issue", NSW Public Health Bulletin, 16 (7–8).
- World Health Organization (2003), "HIA Special Issue", Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81 (6).
Manuals and guidelines
- ICCM (2010), Good Practice Guidance on Health Impact Assessment, London: International Council on Mining and Metals.
- Harris, P; Harris-Roxas, B; Harris, E; Kemp, L (2007), Health Impact Assessment: A practical guide (PDF), Sydney: UNSW and NSW Health, archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-10-30.
- IHPI (2006), Health Impact Assessment Guidance, Dublin: Institute of Public Health in Ireland.
- PHAC (2005), A Guide to Health Impact Assessment: A policy tool for New Zealand (PDF) (2nd ed.), Wellington: Public Health Advisory Committee.
- Abrahams, D; Pennington, A; Scott-Samuel, A; Doyle, C; Metcalfe, O; den Broeder, Lea; Haigh, F; Mekel, O; Fehr, R (2004), European Policy HIA A Guide (PDF), Liverpool: International Health Impact Assessment Consortium (IMPACT) University of Liverpool.
- Mahoney, M; Simpson, S; Harris, E; Aldrich, R; Stewart Williams, J (2004), Equity Focused Health Impact Assessment Framework (PDF), Newcastle, Australia: Australasian Collaboration for Health Equity Impact Assessment.
- enHealth Council (2001), Health Impact Assessment Guidelines (PDF), Canberra: enHealth Council, National Public Health Partnership, archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-10-13.
- Scott-Samuel, A; Birley, M; Ardern, K (2001), The Merseyside Guidelines for Health Impact Assessment (PDF) (2nd ed.), Liverpool: International Health Impact Assessment Consortium (IMPACT) University of Liverpool.
- Birley, M; Gomes, M; Davy, A (1997), Health aspects of environmental assessment, Washington: Environmental Division, The World Bank
- Birley, M; Peralta, G (1992), Guidelines for the Health Impact Assessment of Development Projects, Manila: Asian Development Bank Environment Paper.
- Birley, M (1991), Guidelines for Forecasting the Vector-Borne Disease Implications of Water Resources Development, Geneva: World Health Organization, WHO/CWS/91.1. PEEM Guidelines Series 2..
- CHETRE (2003–2006), New South Wales Health Impact Assessment Project eNews, Sydney: Health Inequalities Program (CHETRE), Research Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales
- Banken, R (2001), Strategies for Institutionalising HIA (PDF), Brussels: European Centre for Health Policy, WHO Europe
This page uses Harvard referencing. Further reading categories are sorted alphabetically; citations are sorted by year (newest to oldest), then alphabetically by author surname within years. If citations are included in the references section they are not listed in the further reading section.
HIA resource websites
- Health Impact Project - Funding for HIA and resources
- HIA Connect
- HIA Gateway
- IMPACT - International Health Impact Assessment Consortium
- RIVM HIA Database
- World Health Organization HIA Site
Government HIA websites
- Environmental Health Branch, New South Wales Health (Australia)
- European Centre for Health Policy (Belgium)
- HPP-HIA Program (Thailand)
- Institute for Public Health in Ireland (Ireland)
- Planning for Healthy Places with Health Impact Assessments (United States)
- San Francisco Department of Public Health (United States)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (United States)
- US Environmental Protection Agency (United States)
University HIA websites
- Monash University, SHIA@Monash (Melbourne, Australia)
- University of Birmingham, HIA Research Unit (Birmingham, UK)
- University of California, Berkeley, Health Impact Group, School of Public Health (Berkeley, USA)
- University of California, Los Angeles, HIA Project (Los Angeles, USA)
- University of California, Los Angeles, Health Impact Assessment Clearinghouse Learning and Information Center (Los Angeles, USA)
- University of Liverpool, IMPACT - International Health Impact Assessment Consortium Department of Public Health and Policy.(Liverpool, UK)
- University of New South Wales, HIA Connect, Health Inequalities, Health Impact Assessment and Healthy Public Policy Program (CHETRE), Research Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, Faculty of Medicine (Sydney, Australia)
- University of Otago, Health, Wellbeing and Equity Impact Assessment Unit, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences (Wellington, New Zealand)
Other HIA websites
This page uses Harvard referencing. External links are sorted alphabetically.