Health information on the Internet
Health information on the Internet refers to all communication related to health done on the Internet.
- 1 Types of health information on the Internet
- 2 Quality
- 3 Personal health information
- 4 Major providers of health information on the Internet
- 5 Regulation
- 6 References
- 7 External links
Types of health information on the Internet
As a general communication channel, various Internet products serve every type of general health information.
Targeting types of information to different audiences
In the late 1990s researchers began to note that huge numbers of people were using the Internet to seek health information, despite various problems with the quality of information or inefficiencies in accessing it. Various problems have been identified for those using search engines to seek health information.
There is a premise that patients with access to their personal health information presented in a form they can understand will be able to interpret and learn from this information in a way that benefits them. Physicians worry that patients using their own medical history records as a starting point for personal research on the Internet are at risk for being overwhelmed and misinformed when seeking health information on the Internet.
As of 2013 opinions about the relationship health care providers should have with online health information were still being established.
Social media channels have been noted as places which physicians can visit to get insight on patient thoughts.
Various commercial organizations use health information gathered from the Internet.
Educational resources for lay audiences
Background on the doctor–patient relationship
Physicians have difficulty explaining complicated medical concepts to their patients and patients have difficulty understanding complicated things which physicians tell them. One reasons for this is that a patient's visit to a physician is likely to be less than 15 minutes, and in any case, physicians are unable to spend the amount of time which patients that patients typically desire. Physicians use medical terms which patients do not understand, but which they would like to learn. There is consensus that patients should have shared decision making, which means that they make informed decisions about the direction of their health care in collaboration with their physician. Rich, educated, socially advantaged patients enjoy many more benefits of shared decision making than patients who have disadvantages in getting healthcare, including lower socioeconomic class or having a minority status.
Lack of patient understanding of health contributes to a range of problems including tendency to not adhere to the physician's medical advice and missing medical appointments. Patients without access to health information are also more likely to use complementary and alternative medicine which is not evidence-based medicine and to fail to inform their physician that they are doing so. While some benefits can be gained by training physicians to be more efficient in serving patients, there are also benefits in training patients to be more efficient in getting benefits from physicians and there are arguments that encouraging efficient patient behavior is a powerful strategy for improving health care processes.
Various social forums exist in which anyone can have conversations about health with their peers. Such forums are especially popular among patients who seek to have conversations with other patients with a shared medical concern. Those who participate in online communities which discuss health issues report feeling relief about their health worries, perceiving more control over their health and medical condition, having more medical knowledge, and having more personal agency overall.
Some research has failed to find evidence to validate physicians' concerns that patients typically receive misinformation online or using health information to inappropriately conduct self diagnosis. Patients with chronic diseases who use the Internet to get health information often acquire good skills to judge the quality of information which they find.
Academic medical literature
The written record of medical consensus is stored in scientific journals. Since the advent of electronic publishing there has been academic journal publishing reform which had a range of effects, including more researchers and physicians having greater access to professional information in medical journals through the Internet.
Patients' personal health information
Through various sources both publicly and privately available, datasets containing health information about large numbers of patients are available on the Internet to an extent which was impossible to manage before the Internet.
Measures and standards for ensuring quality control on the Internet have been criticized and no one standard is universally accepted. Regardless of what kind of measure is use, much health information on the Internet is of dubious quality. Among all sources there is a wide variance in quality of health information on the Internet.
Personal health information
For many applications people wish to use health information on the Internet to give insight about a personal health concern. Because of this, the goal is often to use the Internet to find information described in a person's medical record. Since the advent of electronic media, medical records have been increasing kept as electronic medical records. If electronic medical records were shared online then it would be easy to match those with information and conduct a range of research. However, all medical records are protected health information because sharing personal health information exposes an individual to a range of harms which result from violation of their expectation of privacy.
There is currently broad international debate about how to balance patient and commercial medicine demands for personal health information with individual's needs for safety and respect.
Electronic medical records
De-identification is an attempt to divide a collection of information about a particular person so that all information which identifies the person is removed, and with intent to distribute whatever information is left. The closer the data is to anonymization the less valuable the data is to those who want it, so in general, data is only de-identified somewhat and rarely anonymized. There are many controversies in de-identification.
Research using personal health information
Distribution of collections of personal health information
Various groups have expressed worry over danger to the public which results from the distribution of collections of personal health information.
Major providers of health information on the Internet
PubMed is a free search engine accessing primarily the MEDLINE database of references and abstracts on life sciences and biomedical topics. The United States National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health maintains the database.
In 2014 Wikipedia was described as "the leading single source of healthcare information for patients and healthcare professionals".
- Risk, A.; Petersen, C. (2002). "Health Information on the Internet". JAMA 287 (20): 2713–2715. doi:10.1001/jama.287.20.2713. PMID 12020308.
- Berland, G. K.; Elliott, M. N.; Morales, L. S.; Algazy, J. I.; Kravitz, R. L.; Broder, M. S.; Kanouse, D. E.; Muñoz, J. A.; Puyol, J. A.; Lara, M.; Watkins, K. E.; Yang, H.; McGlynn, E. A. (2001). "Health Information on the Internet". JAMA 285 (20): 2612–2621. doi:10.1001/jama.285.20.2612. PMID 11368735.
- Beaudin, JS; Intille, SS; Morris, ME (2006). "To track or not to track: user reactions to concepts in longitudinal health monitoring.". Journal of medical Internet research 8 (4): e29. doi:10.2196/jmir.8.4.e29. PMC 1794006. PMID 17236264.
- Robeznieks, A (May 21, 2007). "Getting personal. Legal liability, patient-data overload among issues making physicians uneasy over emergence of personal health records.". Modern healthcare 37 (21): 40–2. PMID 17824189.
- Farnan, Jeanne M. (16 April 2013). "Online Medical Professionalism: Patient and Public Relationships: Policy Statement From the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards". Annals of Internal Medicine 158 (8): 620. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00100.
- Verhoef, Lise M; Van de Belt, Tom H; Engelen, Lucien JLPG; Schoonhoven, Lisette; Kool, Rudolf B (20 February 2014). "Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review". Journal of Medical Internet Research 16 (2): e56. doi:10.2196/jmir.3024. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Mechanic, David; McAlpine, Donna D.; Rosenthal, Marsha (18 January 2001). "Are Patients' Office Visits with Physicians Getting Shorter?". New England Journal of Medicine 344 (3): 198–204. doi:10.1056/NEJM200101183440307.
- Castro, CM; Wilson, C; Wang, F; Schillinger, D (Sep–Oct 2007). "Babel babble: physicians' use of unclarified medical jargon with patients.". American journal of health behavior. 31 Suppl 1: S85–95. doi:10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.supp.S85. PMID 17931142.
- Braddock III, Clarence H.; Edwards, Kelly A.; Hasenberg, Nicole M.; Laidley, Tracy L.; Levinson, Wendy (22 December 1999). "Informed Decision Making in Outpatient Practice". JAMA 282 (24): 2313. doi:10.1001/jama.282.24.2313.
- Fiscella, Kevin; Epstein, Ronald M. (22 September 2008). "So Much to Do, So Little Time:care for the socially disadvantaged and the 15-minute visit". Archives of Internal Medicine 168 (17): 1843. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.17.1843.
- A better source should be used to support this claim, although this source is good enough for how it is used here.
- Robinson, A; McGrail, MR (Jun–Sep 2004). "Disclosure of CAM use to medical practitioners: a review of qualitative and quantitative studies.". Complementary therapies in medicine 12 (2-3): 90–8. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2004.09.006. PMID 15561518.
- Lorig, K (Mar 9, 2002). "Partnerships between expert patients and physicians.". Lancet 359 (9309): 814–5. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07959-X. PMID 11897275.
- Eysenbach, G. (15 May 2004). "Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions". BMJ 328 (7449): 1166–0. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166.
- Barak, Azy; Boniel-Nissim, Meyran; Suler, John (September 2008). "Fostering empowerment in online support groups". Computers in Human Behavior 24 (5): 1867–1883. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.004.
- Ahmad, F; Hudak, PL; Bercovitz, K; Hollenberg, E; Levinson, W (Sep 29, 2006). "Are physicians ready for patients with Internet-based health information?". Journal of medical Internet research 8 (3): e22. doi:10.2196/jmir.8.3.e22. PMC 2018833. PMID 17032638.
- Crocco, AG; Villasis-Keever, M; Jadad, AR (Jun 5, 2002). "Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet.". JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association 287 (21): 2869–71. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2869. PMID 12038937.
- Stevenson, FA; Kerr, C; Murray, E; Nazareth, I (Aug 16, 2007). "Information from the Internet and the doctor-patient relationship: the patient perspective--a qualitative study.". BMC family practice 8: 47. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-8-47. PMC 2041946. PMID 17705836.
- Jadad, A. R.; Gagliardi, A. (1998). "Rating Health Information on the Internet". JAMA 279 (8): 611–614. doi:10.1001/jama.279.8.611. PMID 9486757.
- Purcell, G. P.; Wilson, P.; Delamothe, T. (2002). "The quality of health information on the internet". BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 324 (7337): 557–558. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7337.557. PMC 1122494. PMID 11884303.
- Fahy, E; Hardikar, R; Fox, A; Mackay, S (2014). "Quality of patient health information on the Internet: reviewing a complex and evolving landscape.". The Australasian medical journal 7 (1): 24–28. doi:10.4066/AMJ.2014.1900. PMC 3920473. PMID 24567763.
- Pagliari, C; Detmer, D; Singleton, P (Aug 18, 2007). "Potential of electronic personal health records.". BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 335 (7615): 330–3. doi:10.1136/bmj.39279.482963.AD. PMC 1949437. PMID 17703042.
- Tang, P. C; Ash, J. S; Bates, D. W; Overhage, J M.; Sands, D. Z (1 March 2006). "Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption". Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 13 (2): 121–126. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2025. PMC 1447551. PMID 16357345.
- Doctorow, Cory (5 June 2013). "Data protection in the EU: the certainty of uncertainty". theguardian.com. Retrieved 31 March 2014.
- Ramesh, Randeep (19 January 2014). "NHS patient data to be made available for sale to drug and insurance firms". theguardian.com. Retrieved 31 March 2014.
- Wolf, Asher (7 February 2014). "Thanks to Care.data, your secrets are no longer safe with your GP (Wired UK)". wired.co.uk. Retrieved 31 March 2014.
- Note - sketchy link requires registration. IMS Health (2014). "The use of Wikipedia in Health Care". Engaging patients through social media Is healthcare ready for empowered and digitally demanding patients?. IMS Health. pp. 16–26. Retrieved 22 January 2014. Further cited in
- NPR staff (8 February 2014). "Dr. Wikipedia: The 'Double-Edged Sword' Of Crowd-Sourced Medicine". npr.org. NPR. Retrieved 10 February 2014.
- Feltman, Rachel (28 January 2014). "America’s future doctors are starting their careers by saving Wikipedia". qz.com. Retrieved 5 February 2014.
- Reagan, Michael (31 Jan 2014). "Wikipedia Shouldn't be Doctors' online healthcare source". newsmax.com. Retrieved 5 February 2014.
- Tucker, Miriam E. (5 February 2014). "Doctors, Not Just Patients, Use Wikipedia, Too: IMS Report". Medscape. Retrieved 7 February 2014.
- Beck, Julie (5 March 2014). "Doctors’ #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia". theatlantic.com. Retrieved 5 March 2014.
- FDA Voice (17 June 2014). "FDA Issues Draft Guidances for Industry on Social Media and Internet Communications About Medical Products: Designed with Patients in Mind". blogs.fda.gov. Retrieved 5 September 2014.
- Food and Drug Administration (2014-07-07). "About the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research > For Industry: Using Social Media". fda.gov. Retrieved 5 September 2014.
- Evaluating Health Information by MedlinePlus
- How to Evaluate Health Information on the Internet by the Food and Drug Administration