|This is not for searching for help (in general). To contact Wikipedia go to the Reference desk, or see the Questions page.
Activity here improves search-box and search-results documentation. We like comments and help requests related to our Search technology. Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) also accepts these requests.
|Wikipedia Help Project||(Rated C-class, High-importance)|
|This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Threads with no replies in 30 days may be automatically moved.|
- 1 Recent
- 2 Can someone write my Biography or Can I myself ?
- 3 Problems with search on English Wiktionary
- 4 Question about incategory (or category related) search
- 5 Semi-protected edit request on 8 September 2017
- 6 "Sister projects" should be changed to "similar projects"
- 7 Searching within (or exclusively without) reference contents...
- 8 Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2018
- 9 Search without folding
- 10 searchToken
Hi, Sorry for sounding stupid but how does one search for the most recent results ?,
prefer-recent doesn't work for me? (IE when I search ""London" -recent" or ""London" prefer-recent" I still get jumbled results), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:28, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- See mw:Help:CirrusSearch#Prefer-recent. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Can someone write my Biography or Can I myself ?
- Yatin Mehndiratta, no. That is what personal websites, personal blogs, and social media are for. Softlavender (talk) 11:17, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Problems with search on English Wiktionary
See . Basically, if a page has a multi-word title, and you search for an exact one of the words in that title, you'd expect to find that page in the search results, but it is rarely even on the first results page. Instead you get lots of irrelevant stuff that isn't spelled the same way. Is this a bug? What can we do? Equinox ◑ 21:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Per Help:Searching#Stemming, search
"hordeic"in quotation marks to only get exact matches. Per Help:Searching#Parameters, search
intitle:hordeicto only get results from titles. They can be combined with
intitle:"hordeic". PrimeHunter (talk) 00:12, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
This is after I asked this question and got an answer here. However I either didn't ask the question correctly, or I simply haven't been able to use the answer to get to where I need. I want to search for all articles (not categories) that have been assigned: 1. any category whose title includes the term "Scorsese", boolean-AND 2. any category whose title includes the term "comedy". I tried advanced search by checking only the box for Category but this is for category results, and there is no single category that includes both these terms. I checked also the Article box, but I got many unwanted results. Then I tried various combinations with filters and boolean operators but I can't seem to get what I need. Any further clues? Thank you. Hoverfish Talk 22:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- You could do this with a regex
insourcesearch in the article namespace. --Izno (talk) 01:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- You might also try WP:Petscan or WP:RAQ. --Izno (talk) 12:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Izno. I also use PetScan and I see what you mean with insource + regex, I hadn't thought about it but I will try it next. My main concern however is not so much for editors tasks but for a way to make such searches more approachable to the layman. I will check RAQ and see if I can find some way to encapsulate such querries. For WP Films it's only a certain number of main-film-genre-terms that have been diffused in too many subcategories to be usefull in searches. Thanks again for the tips. Hoverfish Talk 14:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 8 September 2017
|This edit request has been answered. Set the
Hitech waterproofing (talk) 09:40, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 10:50, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
"Sister projects" should be changed to "similar projects"
...or something that is likewise non-genderized. This turns up to the right on the search page where the suggestions are offered. It sounds off and awkward and inappropriate. Like something from the ministry of feminist information, like some kind of female only endeavour. Please stop this double standard. If you have to say "humanity" or "humankind" instead of "man" or "men" then it's only fair to stop this "sister" nonsense too. Gender bias free language should apply all around. Thanks. Alialiac (talk) 17:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Searching within (or exclusively without) reference contents...
Is there any way to limit a search to specifically text within a <ref></ref> pair or specifically to everything that isn't inside them? I know regex, and I'm sure that a sufficiently complicated insource regex could do it, but I'd rather not, if there was any other way.Naraht (talk) 15:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Insource is the only way besides resorting to a database scan... which would probably also require regex. --Izno (talk) 17:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- That said, if you know the text internal to the reference, you can also search for that instead. (Unless you're looking for template parameters or something?) --Izno (talk) 17:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2018
|This edit request has been answered. Set the
Search without folding
How do I search for article titles containing the word "Strasse"? I tried intitle:Strasse and intitle:"Strasse" and intitle:/Strasse/; they all returned titles with "Straße". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think our search function can do it for titles. It can do exact match searches and other regex searches with
intitle:(requested in phab:T156474). You can use https://tools.wmflabs.org/grep/ for that. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
In case anyone has been wondering about the
&searchToken=something at the end of the URL for a search result, I asked about it at mw:Help talk:CirrusSearch, and the summary is:
When publishing or saving a search link, there is no benefit in including the
&searchToken=somethingat the end of the URL, so it's better left off.