Jump to content

Heruli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Map of the Roman Empire and contemporary indigenous Europe in AD 125, showing a proposed location of Heruli on the Danish islands

The Heruli (also Eruli, Herules, Herulians) were one of the smaller Germanic peoples of Late Antiquity, known from records in the third to sixth centuries AD. The best recorded group of Heruli established a kingdom north of the Middle Danube, probably near present day Lower Austria, where the kingdom of the Rugii was. These two kingdoms were among several which precipitated out of the Hun empire, following the death of Attila in 453 and the Battle of Nedao in 454. After the conquest of this Heruli kingdom by the Lombards in 508, splinter groups moved to present day Sweden, Ostrogothic Italy, and the region near present day Belgrade, which was under Eastern Roman control.

The Danubian Heruli are generally seen as descendants, or at least relatives, of the earlier "Eluri" who lived near the Sea of Azov during in the 3rd century. In 267–270 these Eluri took part together with Goths and other eastern European peoples in two massive raids into Roman provinces in the Balkans and Aegean Sea, attacking not only by land, but notably also by sea. The equation of these "ELuRi" with the "ERuLi" was made by several Byzantine authors, and is still widely accepted; although some scholars such as the linguist Alvar Ellegård have argued against it. Ellegård himself argued that the Heruli were a wandering warrior brotherhood, and not a tribe in the normal sense of the term. More commonly, because a group of 6th-century Heruli moved from the Danube to Scandinavia, some scholars believe that the Heruli had their earliest origins in Scandinavia. Whatever their ultimate origin, there are proposals that there were different Heruli kingdoms in several parts of Europe. Based upon indirect evidence, it is speculated that there was a "Western Heruli" settlement based near the North Sea, possibly on the Lower Rhine or in Jutland. One reason for this is that in 286 AD, only a few years after the eastern raids, an Heruli army were defeated in an attack on Roman Gaul, which some historians speculate to have been an attack by sea. On the other hand, soon after first being noted in contemporary records as Eastern European raiders, Heruli also began entering the Roman empire and serving in its military, where they developed a particularly notable reputation already in the 4th century, and at first this was mainly in the Western Roman Empire. A new Heruli unit was stationed in northern Italy, and there are indications that the Heruli kingdom just outside the Roman frontier near Lower Austria may already have been founded in western Europe by this time.

After the Battle of Adrianople in 378 the Middle Danubian region was overwhelmed with armed groups and settlers from the east including Alans, Goths and Huns, and Rome lost control. In 409 AD Heruli were among the "ferocious" nations, mostly from the Middle Danubian area, that Saint Jerome described as occupying all of Roman Gaul. In the meantime, the new Hunnic empire of Attila established its base in the Middle Danubian region, and some form of the Heruli kingdom known from later records probably continued to exist within his empire, as did the kingdoms of the Rugii and Gepids. After the death of Attila in 453, the Danubian Heruli fought in the Battle of Nedao in 454, although it is not certain which side they took among his various former allies. They also participated in successive conquests of Italy by Odoacer (476), Theoderic the Great (493), Narses (554), and probably also the Lombards (starting in 568). Under Roman command Heruli soldiers played important military roles in Balkan, African, and Italian conflicts. Their last known kingdom at Belgrade was under Roman domination, and other Heruli integrated into larger political entities such as the Gepids and Lombards. The Heruli disappear from the historical record around the time of the conquest of Italy by the Lombards. In this period the Middle Danube was coming under the control of the Pannonian Avars, and Slavic languages were becoming common in that region.

Classification

[edit]

When first mentioned by Roman authors in the 3rd century AD, the "Elouri" were referred to as "Scythians", as were the Goths and other allied tribes.[1] The use of this term for Heruli and Goths probably began as early as Dexippus, most of whose work is now lost.[2] The use of this term does not give us any clear linguistic classification.[3]

In late antiquity, the Gepids, Vandals, Rugii, Sciri, the non-Germanic Alans, and not only the Goths themselves, were all classified by Roman ethnographers as "Gothic" (or "Getic") peoples, and modern historians generally consider the Heruli to be one of these.[4] While historians such as Walter Goffart have pointed out that the Herules are never included in the lists of "Gothic peoples" of Procopius, Mihail Zahariade has pointed out that Zonaras (12.24.20) stated that the Heruli were of Gothic stock, and he suggests this might be why Latin authors did not distinguish the early Heruli from the Goths as carefully as Greek authors did.[5]

None of these eastern peoples were considered "Germanic" by Roman ethnographers at the time.[6] However, in modern scholarship the Heruli, like other peoples presumed to have spoken a Germanic language, are usually classified as a Germanic people.[7][8][9][10] On account of having likely spoken an East Germanic language, such as Gothic, the Heruli are sometimes more specifically classified as an East Germanic people.[11]

Name

[edit]

In English, the plural "Heruli" can also be spelled as Heruls, Herules, or Herulians. The name can be written without "h" in Greek (Ἔρουλοι, 'Erouloi'), Latin (Eruli), and English. Whether or not the h in the spelling represents an organic sound is uncertain.[12]

In the earliest mentions of them in 4th-century records, they were called Eluri ('Ερουλοι), with the "L" and "R" reversed compared to later records. This has led to doubts about whether these first "Erouli" from the Sea of Azov were the same people as the later Eruli from the Danube.[13] Dexippus whose writings about these early "Eluri" only survive in fragments, gave their name a Greek etymology, claiming that they were named after the swamps (ἕλη, hélē) of their Azov homeland.

According to modern scholars the etymology of the name is uncertain but it is thought to be Germanic. More speculatively, it is possibly related to the English word earl (see erilaz) implying that it was an honorific military title.[14] (This etymology is associated with the speculation that the Heruli were not a normal tribal group but a brotherhood of mobile warriors, though there is no consensus for this old proposal, which is based only on the name etymology and the reputation of Heruli as soldiers.[15])

There have been proposals which connected this etymology with Germanic words found in runic inscriptions in Scandinavia signifying a pronunciation erilaR, and there have also been proposals that the word is connected to Germanic words for werewolves and beings with magic powers. None of these proposals can be verified.[16]

Language

[edit]

The Heruli are believed to have spoken a Germanic language.[17] Personal names are one of the only direct sources of evidence for this.[18] Some attested Heruli names are almost certainly Germanic,[19][20] and similar to Gothic names, but a large number are not easily attributed to any specific language family.[21][22]

Given their association with the Goths, the Heruli may have spoken an East Germanic language, related to the Gothic language. Alternatively however, given their proposed connections to Scandinavia, it has also been proposed that they spoke a North Germanic language.[23]

History

[edit]

Possible Scandinavian origins

[edit]
Map of Scandza based upon one interpretation of Jordanes, with the Herulian homeland located in the south of Sweden or on the Danish isles

Although contemporary records locate the Heruli first near the Sea of Azov, and later on the Middle Danube, their ultimate origins are traditionally sought in Scandinavia.[10][24][25][26] The Heruli are thus commonly believed to have migrated from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea before the 3rd century AD. Their Black Sea neighbours the Goths, and their later Danubian neighbours the Rugii, are also both believed to have had their origins on the southern Baltic shore, and there are similar proposals that their ultimate origins were in Scandinavia.[27]

The source of the idea that many non-Roman peoples in Europe had their ultimate origins in Scandinavia is the 6th century historian Jordanes. He specifically claimed that the Goths and Gepids both came from Scandinavia many centuries before his time, which he described as being "like a workshop or even better the womb of nations" (quasi officina gentium aut certe velut vagina nationum). This narrative was extremely influential upon medieval writers, and modern scholars. Jordanes also mentioned the Heruli in a discussion about Scandinavia, saying Heruli were driven out of their own settlements in Scandinavia by the Danes (Herulos propriis sedibus expulerunt).[28] This is interpreted by modern scholars in at least two different ways.[29]

  • The expulsion happened centuries before Jordanes, and the Heruli origins are ultimately in present-day Denmark or southern Sweden.[30][31]
  • This expulsion from Scandinavia was not long before the time of Jordanes, and they may have been recent immigrants to Scandinavia, who had left the Danubian region after the Heruli kingdom there was destroyed. Such a migration is seen by some scholars as being implied by Procopius, a contemporary of Jordanes, who mentioned that after the fall of the Danubian kingdom some Herules re-established themselves near present day Belgrade, among the Romans, while others moved north, crossing from the land of the Danes across the "ocean" to the "island" of Scandinavia ("Thule") where they became neighbours of the "Gauts". He also mentions that when the king of the Belgrade Heruli was murdered, they sent an embassy to the Heruli in Scandinavia, and returned with a new king.[32]

If correct, the second possibility would still leave debate open about whether the ultimate origins of the Heruli were in Scandinavia before they came to the Danube.[33] However, while a migration to Scandinavia can itself be seen as evidence of an old and continuous connection between the Heruli and Scandinavia, some scholars are sceptical of this interpretation, noting that Procopius specifically says that the Heruli who moved to Scandinavia left the "home of their ancestors".[31][30] In contrast, in 2021 Prostko-Prostyński argued that there is "no doubt" about Scandinavian origins. Even though Procopius does not explicitly mention it, "it is hard to assume they ventured so far north without a reason of such nature".[33] In his review of Prostko-Prostyński, Roland Steinacher argues that this is debatable.[34]

Ellegård, one of the scholars who has argued that the expulsion involved immigrants whose real homeland was on the Danube, wrote that "the only thing we can say with reasonable certainty is that a small group of Eruli lived there [in Scandinavia] for some 38–40 years in the first half of the 6th century AD". More controversially, Ellegård proposed that the evidence makes it most likely that the Heruli were actually "a loose group of Germanic warriors which came into being in the late 3rd century in the region north of the Danube limes that extends roughly from Passau to Vienna".[26] This proposal has not been widely accepted.[35]

On the Pontic-Caspian steppe

[edit]

In 267/268 and 269/270 Graeco-Roman writers described two major campaigns by the "Eluri" into the Balkans and Aegean, which were among the last and biggest such seaborne raids from the northern Black Sea coast starting in the 250s.[36] They are normally equated to the later Danubian Heruli.[37] Although doubts have been raised about this link,[26] the Augustan History written in the late 4th century, Jordanes in the 6th century, and George Syncellus around 800 all equated them with the Heruli known in later times.[38]

Jordanes reports that these Heruli of the Azov area in the late 4th century AD were conquered by Ermanaric, king of the Greuthungi Goths.[39][40][41] Ermanaric's realm may also have included Finns, Slavs, Alans and Sarmatians.[42] Before being conquered by Ermanaric, Jordanes says that the Heruli were led by a king named Alaric.[41] Herwig Wolfram has suggested that the future Visigothic king Alaric I may have been named after this Herulian king.[43]

These "Scythian" Heruli are believed to have formed part of the Chernyakhov culture,[44] which, although dominated by the Goths and other Germanic peoples,[8] also included Bastarnae, Dacians and Carpi.[42] The Heruli are thus archaeologically indistinguishable from the Goths.[44][45]

During the raids, Goths, Eluri, and other "Scythian" peoples took control of Black Sea Greek cities, and gained a fleet that they used to launch raids starting in the Black Sea itself, and going as far as Greece and Asia Minor. Although some historians in the past doubted whether there were really two invasions so close together, these invasions began in the reign of Gallienus (260-268 AD), and continued until at least 269 during the reign of Marcus Aurelius Claudius, who subsequently took up the title "Gothicus" due to his victory.[46][47][48]

In 267, a Heruli fleet departed from the Sea of Azov, past the Danube delta, and into the straits of the Bosphorus. They took control of Byzantion[a] and Chrysopolis before retreating to the Black Sea. Emerging to raid Cyzicus, they subsequently entered the Aegean Sea, where they troubled Lemnos, Skyros and Imbros, before landing in the Peloponnese. There they plundered not only Sparta, the closest city to their landing site, but also Corinth, Argos, and the sanctuary of Zeus at Olympia. Still within 267 they reached Athens, where local militias had to defend the city. It seems to have been the Heruli specifically who sacked Athens despite the construction of a new wall, during Valerian’s reign only a generation earlier. This was the occasion for a famous defense made by Dexippus, whose writings were a source for later historians.[49]

Further north, in 268, Gallienus defeated Heruli at the river Nestos using a new mobile cavalry, but as part of the surrender a Herulian chief named Naulobatus became the first barbarian known from written records to receive imperial insignia from the Romans, gaining the rank of a Roman consul. It is highly likely that these defeated Heruli were then made part of the Roman military.[50][51]

Recent researchers such as Steinacher and Prostko-Prostyński now have increased confidence that there was a distinct second campaign which began in 269, and ended in 270.[52] Later Roman writers reported that thousands of ships left from the mouth of the Dnieper, manned by a large force of various different "Scythian" peoples, including Peuci, Greutungi, Austrogothi, Tervingi, Vesi, Gepids, "Celts", and Heruli. These forces divided into two parts in the Hellespont. One force attacked Thessaloniki, and against this group the Romans, led by Claudius now, had a major victory at the Battle of Naissus (Niš, Serbia) in 269. This was apparently a distinct battle from that at the Nessos. A Herulian chieftain named Andonnoballus is said to have switched to the Roman side, and this was once again a case where Heruli appear to have joined the Roman military. The second group sailed south and raided Rhodes, Crete, and Cyprus and many Goths and Heruli managed to return safely to harbor in the Crimea. Lesser attacks continued until 276.[53][54]

The "western" Heruli of the 4th century

[edit]
The shield pattern of the Heruli seniores, a Late Roman military unit composed of Heruli.

As with their neighbours the Goths, Heruli were already seen in western Europe before the empire of Attila, both as raiders and as soldiers working under Roman authority. They first appear at the time of their first ambitious campaigns in the east. In 286 Claudius Mamertinus reported the victory of Maximian over a group of Heruli and Chaibones (known only from this one report[b]) attacking Gaul. These forces had travelled from somewhere distant, as they were described as being the foremost barbarians in might, and most remote in location.[55] Further reports of the Heruli in the west continue in the 4th century and based on this there is a proposal that there was a distinct Western kingdom of Heruli living near the Lower Rhine, who were not descended from the Heruli who lived in the Black Sea.[56][57]

Already before the time of Attila the Romans established a Herulian auxiliary unit in the Western Roman Empire, and it has been argued that this implies that they were already settled somewhere within the empire. The Heruli seniores were stationed in northern Italy. This numerus Erulorum was a lightly-equipped unit often associated with the Batavian Batavi seniores. If there was ever a regiment called Heruli iuniores, then it is possible it was based in the Eastern Roman empire and it may have been one of the units which ceased to exist after the Battle of Adrianople in 378.[58]

  • In about 314, the Heruli (like the Sciri and Rugii) were already listed in the Laterculus Veronensis as one of the barbarian peoples living under Roman domination. Ellegård argues that this and other 4th century sources indicate that several of Attila's future allies in the Middle Danube were already established in the 4th century. He proposes that the Heruli were already based somewhere between Passau and Vienna.[59] Liccardo has however criticized Ellegård's interpretation of the evidence, noting that they are placed (together with the Rugii) between the northern British Barbarians and the tribes of the Lower Rhine.[60]
  • In 360, Constantius II ordered the future emperor Julian the Apostate, who then had command of forces in Gaul, to send some of his best units including the Heruli, Batavi, and others, for fighting against the Parthians in the Middle East.The records about this imply that the Heruli were a unit who had left their homes east of the Rhine, which Ellegård thinks is consistent with a base near Passau, while Liccardo emphasizes that it implies that they now lived west of the Rhine.[61][62]
  • In 366 the Batavian and Heruli units fought against the Alamanni near the Rhine, under the leadership of Charietto, who died in the battle, and then against Picts and Scoti in Britain. They were subsequently sent to fight Parthians in the east.[63][64]
  • In 405 or 406, a large number of barbarian groups crossed the Rhine, entering Roman Gaul, and the Heruli appear in the list of peoples given by the historian Jerome. However, this list is sometimes thought to have drawn on historical lists for literary effect. Furthermore the list included many of the Middle Danubian peoples from the East, including Roman provincials from Pannonia, and was already in the period where the Huns were causing major movements of such peoples.
  • In 435 the Heruli are mentioned by Sidonius Apollinaris (Letter 7, lines 23–240) among the troops which Aëtius, who had spent time in exile with the Danubian Huns, used to defend Gallia Belgica, a Roman province, from Burgundians. (At least some of his troops such as the Sarmatians apparently came from Eastern Europe.)[65]

Ellegård argues that the association with the Batavi in this period should be seen not as a connection to the Lower Rhine, the original home of the Batavi unit centuries earlier, but to their quarters in this period which were at Passau (Castra Batava) on the Danube, not far from where the Heruli would later have their kingdom.[66] Liccardo argues that even though "units were moved around and over time tended to lose any ethnic or geographical homogeneity" they could still give hints about the origins of ethnic groups.[67]

At least two much later mentions of Heruli in southwestern Europe, after the Heruli were established on the Middle Danube, and in parts of Italy, can be connected to the Visigoths who had been granted a kingdom by the Romans in what is now southwestern France, but have also been taken to imply the existence of Heruli based on the North Sea coast, for example near the Lower Rhine. Firstly, two sea raids were made by Heruli around coastal Spain in the 450s, as reported by Hydatius. Secondly, shortly after 475 Sidonius Apollinaris reported the presence of Heruli at the Visigothic court of Euric in Bordeaux.[56][68] They are listed in a poetic way together with other barbarians, from places as distant as Parthia, who Sidonius found looking for protection and patronage.

Latin English
hic glaucis Herulus genis vagatur, Here wanders the Herulian with his blue-grey cheeks,
imos Oceani colens recessus algoso prope concolor profundo. who dwells in the uttermost retreats of Ocean and is almost of one colour with its algae-filled depths.

Particularly striking in this passage is the implication that the Heruli homeland is on the "Ocean". More generally the connection of these Heruli with the sea, so far to the west, is sometimes taken as evidence that these Heruli were not from the Danube or Black Sea. Steinacher, on the other hand, argues that the poetic references of Sidonius linking the Heruli to the sea might be "nothing more than a bookish reference to 3rd-century accounts of Herules" who attacked from the Black Sea.[69] Steinacher, along with fellow scholar Halsall, has pointed out that this evidence of Heruli in Visigothic territory is consistent with the conflicts within the Roman empire during this period; Halsall writes that it "must at least be a possibility" that the Herulian raids in Spain during this period "constituted part of a Romano-Visigothic offensive against the Sueves". These Suebi, themselves from central Europe, had recently established a kingdom on the northern coast of Spain, and the Visigoths coordinated with Rome against them.[70] On the other hand, other scholars, such as Liccardo, emphasize that Sidonius lists the Herulians with Saxons, Franks and Burgundians—i.e., as if they were subjects or supplicants from Gaul.[71]

Kingdom on the Middle Danube

[edit]
Approximate territory under Hunnic control in 450 AD
Roman provinces in the region of modern Austria

The Laterculus Veronensis shows that Heruli and Rugii were already present somewhere in western Europe in about 314. Similar listings from later in the 4th century, the Cosmographia of Julius Honorius, and probably also the Liber Generationis, both listed the Heruli near the Marcomanni and Quadi who are known from many records to have lived until the 4th century in the region north of the Danube, where the Herule kingdom would later be found.[59][72]

In the late 4th century, large groups of Eastern European peoples including most notably the Goths and Alans, crossed the Lower Danube into the Roman empire, while others entered the Middle Danubian region, between the Carpathians and the Roman empire. The Huns and their allies also moved east and began established themselves near the Danube around 400. The Roman military was weakened and increasingly reliant upon barbarian forces. They were also internally divided, with a rebel emperor in Gaul, Constantine III, and open conflict between the Western and Eastern empires in the Balkans. Before 409, large numbers of "ferocious" peoples including the Heruli, Quadi, Vandals, Sarmatians, Alans, Gepids, Saxons, Burgundians, and Alemanni, together with provincial inhabitants of Roman Pannonia, are reported by Saint Jerome to have crossed the Rhine and occupied all parts of Roman Gaul. Several of these such as the Vandals, Alans, Saxons and Burgundians are known to have permanently settled in different parts of Roman Gaul and Iberia. Also at this time, the Gothic king Radagaisus invaded Italy itself from Pannonia, occupying Roman forces there.[73]

By 450 AD, the Heruli and the other peoples still in the Middle Danube area, including Gepids, Rugi, Sciri, and many of the Goths, Alans and Sarmatians, were firmly within the Hunnic empire of Attila.[74] Although they were not specifically listed by Sidonius or Jordanes, Heruli are believed to have been among the peoples who fought at the Battle of the Catalaunian Plains between the Romans and Attila, possibly on both sides.[75][65] As indirect evidence, centuries later Paul the Deacon listed the subject peoples who Attila could call upon in addition to the better known Goths and Gepids: "Marcomanni, Suebi, Quadi, and alongside them the Herules, Thuringi and Rugii".[76]

After the death of Attila in 453, his sons lost power over the various peoples of his empire at the Battle of Nedao in 454. The Heruli are listed by Jordanes as having fought at the Battle of Nedao, but we do not know if they took the Gepid or Ostrogothic side. They were subsequently among the several peoples now able to consolidate a kingdom on the Danube. Procopius describes it as being north of the Danube.[77] They ruled over a mixed population including Suevi, Huns and Alans.[78] Compared to other Middle Danubian kingdoms in this period, Peter Heather has described this Heruli kingdom as "middle-sized", similar to the Rugian one, but "clearly not as militarily powerful, say, as the Gothic, Lombard, or Gepid confederations which generated much longer-lived political entities, and into which elements of the Rugii and Heruli were eventually absorbed".[79] Peter Heather estimates that the Herulian kingdom could muster an army of 5,000-10,000 men.[80]

In about 468 the neighbouring kingdoms of the Sciri and Suevi were badly defeated at the Battle of Bolia, against the Ostrogoths. According to some scholars the Heruli could have benefited, and been able to establish control on the previously Roman south side of the Danube, north of Lake Balaton in modern Hungary.[81]

In 476, Odoacer, son of the old defeated Scirian leader Edeko, and now commander of the imperial foederati troops in Italy, deposed the last Western Roman Emperor Romulus Augustus. He was seen as king over several of the Danubian peoples within the Roman military in Italy, including Sciri, Rugi, and Heruli. The Heruli in Italy suffered badly when Odoacer was defeated by the Ostrogoth Theoderic, who became the new king in 493. Paul the Deacon nevertheless mentioned Heruli continuing to live in Italy under Ostrogothic rule.[82]

In about 480, according to the life story of Severinus of Noricum written by Eugippius, the Heruli attacked Ioviaco near Passau, which lay to the west of the Rugian kingdom, and is now on the border of Germany and Austria.[78]

When Odoacer defeated the Rugian kingdom on the Danube in 488, according to Paul the Deacon the Lombards moved and occupied their country, and they stayed there a number of years. They then left and settled in a flat plain which modern scholars believe to be the Little Alföld region, now in Hungary.[83] Procopius reported that by the time Anastasius became emperor in 491 the Heruli had forced the Langobardi and other surrounding peoples to pay tribute and no longer had anyone to attack in the area where they lived. According to him, only three years later, in 494, King Roduulf was pressured by his followers to attack the Lombards. He died in the ensuing battle, and the Heruli kingdom came to an end. The Heruli had to move from the territory they had been holding.[84] Some modern scholars believe however that the war, and the death of Ruduulf, must have been significantly later than Procopius reports, because Theoderic, who only ruled Italy only from 493, had correspondence with Herulian royalty, including a diplomatic letter implying that the Heruli were still a powerful kingdom, located in a position which was coming under threat from the Franks. In another letter he also adopted a Heruli king as an adult, gifting him with arms and calling this a tradition of the non-Roman peoples.

The location of the 5th century Heruli kingdom is never described in classical sources, but they imply that it shared a border with the Rugian kingdom that is described by Eugippius in his biography of Severinus of Noricum, stretching along the Danube in what is now Lower Austria, west of Vienna. Prostko-Prostyński argues that while many scholars assume they lived to the east of the Rugii, in southern Moravia or southwestern Slovakia, there is evidence that they lived further west, in another part of Lower Austria, or possibly in southwestern Bohemia. As evidence he notes that Eugippius reported that they raided Roman Noricum, implying that they had access without going though Rugian land. Also, the 6th century correspondence of Theoderic the Great, preserved in Variae of Cassiodorus, implies that in the period after the destruction of the Rugian kingdom they were in a position exposed to Frankish expansion.[85]

In contrast, proponents of a distinct Western Herulian kingdom near the Rhine note that the letter was also sent to the kings of the Thuringians and Warini—quite far to the north of the Danube, and more directly threatened by the Franks who are discussed in the letter; opponents emphasize that Theoderic was clearly concerned with a large part of central Europe, and that the Franks did in reality quickly make inroads towards the Middle Danubian region in this period, threatening even Italy itself.[86]

Later history

[edit]

After the Middle Danubian Herulian kingdom was destroyed by the Lombards, Herulian fortunes waned. According to Procopius they could not stay in the ancestral lands, so they moved around in the regions beyond the Danube, with their wives and children coming to territory where the Rugii had lived, but the land was barren and this led to famine.[87] Scholars such as Prostko-Prostyński, interpret this to be Rugiland in northeastern Lower Austria, which had been emptied of population by Odoacer after 488.[88] Others such as Steinacher believe it must be a region where the Rugians had lived only temporarily after they were defeated, and before they joined the Goths.[89] The Heruli then moved to a region near the Gepids, as suppliants to them. However, the Gepids mistreated them, violating their women and stealing their property, so a large part of the Heruli crossed the Danube into Roman territory where they were welcomed by Emperor Anastasius I (reigned 491-518). Marcellinus Comes dates this to 512.[90]

At this point the Heruli split. Another group including royalty went north and settled in Thule, which for Procopius meant Scandinavia.[30] Procopius noted that these Heruli first traversed the lands of the Slavs, then empty lands, then the lands of Varni, followed by the land of the Danes, until finally crossing a part of the Ocean and settling near the Geats.[91] Historian Peter Heather considers this account to be "entirely plausible" although he notes that others have labelled it a "fairy story", and given that it only appears in one source it is possible to deny its validity.[79]

There is uncertainty regarding another Heruli group who are mentioned in the correspondence of Cassiodorus. Theoderic the Great ordered that they should be accommodated and assisted in Pavia in north Italy. The date is however unclear, and they may have been envoys from the kingdom of Rudolf, either before or after it fell.[92]

Most modern scholars believe the main group who entered the empire were moved first to the area of Bassianae (near modern Donji Petrovci) in an eastern part of Pannonia which confronted the part still ruled by the Ostrogoths to the west.[93] They were attacked by Anastasius for treating the Roman population in a lawless way. Later, the remaining Heruli were given land at Singidunum in Moesia (modern Belgrade) by Emperor Justinian, after he became emperor in 527.[94] Justinian integrated the Heruli into the empire as a buffer between the Romans and the more independent Lombards and Gepids to the north. Under his encouragement, the Herule king Grepes converted to Orthodox Christianity in 528 together with some nobles and twelve relatives.[95] Procopius who felt that this made them somewhat gentler, also showed in his account of the wars against the African Vandals, that some of them were Arian Christians.[96]

The Heruli were often mentioned during the times of Justinian, who used them in his extensive military campaigns in many countries including Italy, Syria, and North Africa. Pharas was a notable Herulian commander during this period. Several thousand Heruli served in the personal guard of Belisarius throughout the campaigns, and Narses also recruited from them. They were a participant in the Byzantine-Sasanian wars.

Grepes and most of his family had apparently died by the early 540s, possibly in the Plague of Justinian (541-542).[97][98] Procopius related that in the 540s the Heruli who had been settled in the Roman Balkans killed their own king Ochus and, not wanting the one assigned by the emperor, Suartuas, they made contact with the Heruli who had gone to Thule decades earlier, seeking a new king. Their first choice fell sick and died when they had come to the country of the Dani, and a second choice was made. The new king Datius arrived with his brother Aordus and 200 young men.[99][100] The Heruli who were sent against Suartuas defected with him and were supported by the empire. The supporters of Datius, two thirds of the Heruli, submitted to the Gepids.[97] This period of rebellion against Rome lasted approximately 545–548, the period immediately before conflict between their larger neighbours the Gepids and Lombards broke out, but this rebellion was repressed by Justinian.[101]

In 549, when the Gepids fought the Romans, the Heruli therefore fought on both sides.[102] In any case after one generation in the Belgrade area, the Herulian federate polity in the Balkans disappears from the surviving historical records, apparently replaced by the incoming Avars.[100]

Peter Heather has written that:

by c. 540 being a Herule had ceased to be the main determinant of individual behaviour; the Heruli had ceased to operate together on the basis of that shared heritage, and different Heruli were adopting different strategies for survival in the new political conditions which even caused them to fight on opposing sides. After c.540, we still find small groups called Heruli fighting for the East Romans in Italy, and it is noticeable that the Roman commanders were careful to appoint for them leaders of their own race. Thus some sense of identity probably remained. That said, we are clearly dealing with a few fragments of the original group, and, in the prevailing circumstances, Herule identity had no future.[103]

Sarantis however shows that the Belgrade-region Heruli continued to be recruited, and to play a role in local conflicts involving the Gepids and Lombards, into the 550s. Suartas, no longer a king, but still a Herule general for the Romans, led Herule forces against the Gepids in 552 for example.[104] However it appears that by this period the semi-independent Heruli near Belgrade became Roman provincials.[105]

In 566, Sinduald, a Herule military leader under Narses, was declared a king of Heruli in Trentino in northern Italy, but he was executed by Narses. Sinduald was said to be a descendant of the Herules who had already entered Italy under Odoacer.[106][107]

Paul the Deacon writes that many Heruli joined the Lombard king Alboin in their eventual conquest of Italy from the empire in the late 6th century AD.[108]

Along with the Rugii and Sciri, the Heruli may have contributed to the formation of the Bavarii.[109]

Culture

[edit]

Political culture

[edit]

While there is very little detailed information available, historical sources name six kings of the Danubian Herules, from the first half of the 6th century. Unlike their neighbours the Goths and Gepids, they appear to have had a limited role, and some of the military leaders who fought under the Romans are better known. Based mainly on the remarks of Procopius it appears they did not necessarily make all decisions, but they were expected to play a partly symbolic role in leading their people in battle, and representing them in dealings with other peoples and empires. Procopius suggests that the Herulian kings were often challenged and could be deposed if they failed to meet the expectations of their people.[110]

Religion

[edit]

The early religion of the Heruli is vividly described by Procopius in his History of the Wars. He describes them as a polytheistic society known to practice human sacrifice.[111][112] The Heruli appear to have been worshippers of Odin, and might have been responsible for the spread of such worship to Northern Europe.[113]

By the time of Justinian, Procopius reports that many Heruli were Arian Christians. In any case, Justinian appears to have pursued a policy of converting them to orthodox Chalcedonian Christianity.[96]

Society

[edit]

Procopius writes that the Heruli practiced a form of senicide, having a non-relative kill the sick and elderly and burning the remains on a wooden pyre.[111][112] Procopius also states that, following the death of their husbands, Herulian women were expected to commit suicide by hanging.[114][112]

Furthermore, Procopius claims that the Heruli practiced homosexuality[115] or bestiality, depending on the interpretation:

They are still, however, faithless toward them [the Romans], and since they are given to avarice, they are eager to do violence to their neighbours, feeling no shame at such conduct. And they mate in an unholy manner, especially men with asses, and they are the basest of all men and utterly abandoned rascals.[112]

The translated "especially men with asses" is from the original Greek text (provided next to Dewing's translation) "ἂλλας τε καί ἀνδρῶν καί ὄνων"[112] where ὄνων is genitive plural of ὄνος, meaning donkeys.

It appears that Procopius disliked the Heruli and wanted to present them in as negative light as possible. His description of bestiality among the Heruli is almost certainly untrue.[115]

Warfare

[edit]

The Heruli were famous for the quality of their infantry, who were recruited as mercenaries by all other peoples.[116] They were known particularly for their speed, and were perhaps used for the stabbing cavalry.[117] Procopius described the Heruli in the Battle of Anglon against Persians, carrying no protective armor save a shield and thick jacket.[118][114][119] This form of warfare has been compared to that of the berserkers of the Viking Age.[120]

Herulian slaves are known to have accompanied the Herules into combat. Slaves were forbidden from donning a shield until having proven themselves brave on the battlefield. This practice might be a relic of ancient Indo-European tradition.[115] Steinacher has pointed out that, while this remark has reasonably been seen as evidence of an "initiation rite", initiation rites are so common that caution is required:

It is of course far from clear exactly what Procopius had in mind when writing about Herul 'slaves'. But he surely provided plenty of evidence that any gens was open to newcomers. As in any other human community, both in the past and in the present, such newcomers had to prove themselves worthy before receiving full membership in that community. This must have been even truer for a community geared towards warfare.[121]

Material culture

[edit]

The tumuli of the Heruli on the Middle Danube in the early 6th century are very similar to contemporary tumuli built in southern Sweden.[122] At this time, the Heruli appears to have had close trade relations with peoples living near the Baltic Sea.[122]

Physical appearance

[edit]

In Getica, Jordanes writes that the Heruli claimed to be the tallest people of Scandza. Jordanes further writes that all the peoples of Scandza "surpassed the Germans in size and spirit".[28] Sidonius Apollinaris wrote that the Heruli had blue-grey eyes.[123]

The negative excursus of Procopius

[edit]

Scholars remark that the historian Procopius had a notable fascination with the Herules, which colors his descriptions of them. As Steinacher remarks, "Procopius's Herul excursus [...] is full of stereotypes and negative attitudes towards this primitive people and its archaic conventions".[124] This means that caution is required when using his descriptions as evidence. In the words of Walter Goffart:

Though appreciative of their military qualities, he goes out of his way to blacken their character – "they are the basest of all men and utterly abandoned rascals," "no men in the world are less bound by convention or more unstable." His low opinion may result from the "special relationship" the Herules appear to have had with Justinian's eunuch general, Narses, who Procopius disliked.[125]

Although Procopius praised the Herule named Pharas who brought about the surrender of the north African Vandal king Gelimer, he noted that despite being born a Herule, he did not drink excessively and was not unreliable.[126]

Procopius was not mollified. The Herules were part of the panorama of an entire "West" that, owing to Justinian's neglect, had come into the possession of the barbarians by the late 540s. [...] The crowning irony, in the historian's view, was that, because some Herules served as Roman foederati, they both plundered Roman subjects and collected pay from the Roman emperor.[127]

Places sacked by the Heruli

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ the area of modern Istanbul
  2. ^ The Chaibones may have been Aviones, according to Neumann, Namenstudien zum Altgermanischen, p. 316.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Angelov 2018, p. 678.
  2. ^ Zahariade 2010.
  3. ^ Reynolds & Lopez 1946, p. 43 n22: "the term, of course, had no classificatory significance".
  4. ^ See for example Wolfram (2005, p. 77) and Steinacher (2017, p. 28).
  5. ^ Goffart (2006, pp. 205–206, 335) and Zahariade (2010, p. 167)
  6. ^ Wolfram 2005, p. 259.
  7. ^ Wolfram 1990, p. 592. "Heruli, Germanic tr."
  8. ^ a b Heather 1994, p. 87. "[S]ome of the territory covered by the Sîntana de Mureş–Černjachov culture may have been controlled not by Goths but by related Germanic peoples, such as the Heruli."
  9. ^ Heather 2012, p. 678. "Heruli, a Germanic people ..."
  10. ^ a b Angelov 2018, p. 715. "Heruli. Germanic tribe with possible origins in Scandinavia ..."
  11. ^ Green 2003, p. 13; Neumann 1999, p. 468
  12. ^ Prostko-Prostyński 2021, p. 19.
  13. ^ Steinacher 2010, p. 322.
  14. ^ Neumann 1999, p. 468.
  15. ^ Steinacher 2010, pp. 359–360.
  16. ^ Prostko-Prostyński 2021, p. 20.
  17. ^ Heather 2007, p. 469. "Heruli – Germanic-speaking group originally from north central Europe, some of whom migrated to regions north of the Black Sea in company with Goths and others in the 3rd century."
  18. ^ Taylor 1999, pp. 468–469.
  19. ^ Maenchen-Helfen 1947, pp. 837–838. "Schönfeld ... offers Germanic etymologies not only for Faras and Alvith but also for Fanotheus, Filimuth, Hariso, Sindval, Svartva, Uligangus, and Visandus. Other Germanic names of the Heruli, not listed in Schönfeld, are Sindila, Batemodus, and Cunthia. Like the Heruli the Rugi were ... most certainly a Germanic tribe ... The Heruli and Rugians were Germans. So were the Scirians as proved by the names of their leaders."
  20. ^ Goffart 2006, pp. 335.
  21. ^ Taylor 1999, pp. 468–469: "Aufschluß über die Sprache der H. geben nur die Namen, von denen die lat. und griech. Qu. eindeutig berichten, daß sie von H.n geführt wurden. Diejenigen, die problemlos etymologisierbar sind, lassen sich im Hinblick auf diagnostische Dialektmerkmale nicht von got. Namen derselben Zeit unterscheiden. Dies kann jedoch auf einer sekundären Gotisierung in S-Europa sowie auf lat. und griech. Schreibgewohnheiten beruhen und braucht eine skand. Herkunft nicht auszuschließen."
  22. ^ Reynolds & Lopez 1946, p. 42: "It may be granted that the Heruls apparently were Germanic despite the fact that most of the personal names of their leaders baffle German philologist"; " We find among the Heruls an Ochus, which appears Iranian; an Aordus which appears to be based on the name of the Sarmatian Aorsi; and even a Verus, which is quite Roman. Names which "sound" perhaps Dacian were Andonnoballus, Datius, Faras, Alvith, for which neither Forstemann nor Schoenfeld offers a Germanic etymology or can offer one only on the supposition that Greek sources misspelled the name. Only Halaricus, Rodvulf, and Fulcaris yield results to Germanic etymology".
  23. ^ Taylor 1999, p. 469.
  24. ^ Green 2000, p. 131. "[T]he Heruli who in the course of their migrations sent a party back to Scandinavia for a king from amongst the members of their royal family who had remained behind."
  25. ^ Speidel 2004, p. 44.
  26. ^ a b c Ellegård 1987.
  27. ^ Heather 2010, p. 116.
  28. ^ a b Jordanes 1908, p. III (23).
  29. ^ Prostko-Prostyński 2021, p. 24.
  30. ^ a b c Goffart 2006, pp. 205–209.
  31. ^ a b Steinacher 2017, pp. 148–152.
  32. ^ Procopius 1914, Book VI, XV
  33. ^ a b Prostko-Prostyński 2021, pp. 27, 186.
  34. ^ Steinacher 2022.
  35. ^ Prostko-Prostyński 2021, pp. 20, 186.
  36. ^ Prostko-Prostyński 2021, pp. 32–34.
  37. ^ Heather 2010, p. 124.
  38. ^ Schwarcz 2020, p. 394.
  39. ^ Steinacher 2017, pp. 77–80.
  40. ^ Steinacher 2010, pp. 331–333.
  41. ^ a b Jordanes 1908, p. XXIII (116).
  42. ^ a b Green 2000, p. 137.
  43. ^ Heather 1994, p. 33.
  44. ^ a b Green 2000, p. 1.
  45. ^ Heather 1994, p. 87.
  46. ^ Steinacher 2017, pp. 55–66.
  47. ^ Steinacher 2010, pp. 322–327.
  48. ^ Schwarcz 2020, p. 393.
  49. ^ Steinacher 2017, pp. 58–60.
  50. ^ Steinacher 2010, p. 324.
  51. ^ Steinacher 2017, p. 62.
  52. ^ Steinacher 2017, p. 63, Prostko-Prostyński 2021, p. 31. Also see Zahariade (2010).
  53. ^ Steinacher 2017, pp. 63–65.
  54. ^ Steinacher 2010, pp. 326–327.
  55. ^ Nixon & Rodgers 1994, pp. 61–64, 92, 525–526.
  56. ^ a b Goffart 2006, p. 206.
  57. ^ Steinacher 2010, p. 328.
  58. ^ Liccardo 2024, p. 291.
  59. ^ a b Ellegård 1987, p. 22.
  60. ^ Liccardo 2024, p. 297.
  61. ^ Liccardo 2024, pp. 292–293.
  62. ^ Ellegård 1987, p. 20.
  63. ^ Steinacher 2017, p. 67.
  64. ^ Steinacher 2010, pp. 326–328.
  65. ^ a b Steinacher 2017, p. 93.
  66. ^ Ellegård 1987, p. 21.
  67. ^ Liccardo 2024, p. 292.
  68. ^ Letters 8.9
  69. ^ Steinacher 2010, p. 329.
  70. ^ Halsall 2007, p. 260.
  71. ^ Liccardo 2024, p. 294.
  72. ^ Liccardo 2024, pp. 296–298.
  73. ^ Goffart 2006, Ch.5.
  74. ^ Heather 2010, p. 208.
  75. ^ Steinacher 2010, p. 334.
  76. ^ Prostko-Prostyński 2021, pp. 63–64.
  77. ^ Procopius, Wars, VI.14
  78. ^ a b Steinacher 2010, p. 340.
  79. ^ a b Heather 2010, p. 242.
  80. ^ Heather 2010, p. 251.
  81. ^ Steinacher 2010, p. 341.
  82. ^ Steinacher 2010, p. 347.
  83. ^ Paul the Deacon, History of the Lombards, 1.19-20
  84. ^ Procopius, Wars, VI.14
  85. ^ Prostko-Prostyński 2021, pp. 53–55.
  86. ^ See for example Liccardo (2024, p. 294), Steinacher (2017, pp. 73, 140), and Steinacher (2010, pp. 328–330, 348).
  87. ^ Procopius, Wars, IV.14
  88. ^ Prostko-Prostyński 2021, p. 87.
  89. ^ Steinacher 2010, p. 350, Steinacher 2017, pp. 144–145
  90. ^ Marcellinus, Chronicle, under 512
  91. ^ Heather 2010, p. 430 citing Procopius, Wars, https://archive.org/details/b24750281_0003/page/414 IV.15.1]
  92. ^ Steinacher 2017, p. 144.
  93. ^ Steinacher 2010, pp. 350–351.
  94. ^ Sarantis 2010, p. 369, Prostko-Prostyński 2021, pp. 89–90
  95. ^ Steinacher 2010, pp. 351–352.
  96. ^ a b Sarantis 2010, p. 372.
  97. ^ a b Goffart 2006, p. 209.
  98. ^ Steinacher 2017, p. 147.
  99. ^ Heather 2010, p. 225.
  100. ^ a b Steinacher 2010, pp. 354–355.
  101. ^ Sarantis 2010, pp. 393–397.
  102. ^ Sarantis 2010, p. 394.
  103. ^ Heather 1998, p. 109.
  104. ^ Sarantis 2010, p. 385.
  105. ^ Sarantis 2010, p. 402.
  106. ^ Steinacher 2010, p. 355.
  107. ^ Steinacher 2017, p. 159.
  108. ^ Heather 2010, p. 240.
  109. ^ Green 2000, p. 321.
  110. ^ Banfi 2022.
  111. ^ a b Davidson 1990, p. 54.
  112. ^ a b c d e Procopius 1914, Book VI, XIV
  113. ^ Davidson 1990, p. 148.
  114. ^ a b Davidson 1990, p. 67.
  115. ^ a b c Bremmer 1992, pp. 58–59.
  116. ^ Jordanes 1908, p. XXIII (117–118).
  117. ^ Speidel 2004, p. 136.
  118. ^ Steinacher 2010, p. 353.
  119. ^ Procopius 1914, Book II, XXV
  120. ^ Speidel 2004, pp. 58–61.
  121. ^ Steinacher 2010, p. 360.
  122. ^ a b Christie 1995, p. 29.
  123. ^ Heather 2007, p. 423.
  124. ^ Steinacher 2017, p. 349.
  125. ^ Goffart (2006, pp. 206–207)
  126. ^ Steinacher 2017, p. 168.
  127. ^ Goffart (2006, p. 208)

Sources

[edit]

Ancient sources

[edit]
  • Jordanes (1908). The Origins and Deeds of the Goths. Translated by Mierow, Charles C. Princeton University Press.. Also see Latin version: https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/iordanes1.html.
  • Procopius (1914). History of the Wars. Translated by Dewing, Henry Bronson. Heinemann.

Modern sources

[edit]
[edit]

Wikimedia Commons logo Media related to Heruli at Wikimedia Commons