History of abortion
The practice of abortion—the termination of a pregnancy—has been known since ancient times. Various methods have been used to perform or attempt an abortion, including the administration of abortifacient herbs, the use of sharpened implements, the application of abdominal pressure, and other techniques.
Abortion laws and their enforcement have fluctuated through various eras. In many western countries during the 20th century abortion-rights movements were successful in having abortion bans repealed. While abortion remains legal in most of the West, this legality is regularly challenged by anti-abortion groups.
- 1 Premodern era
- 2 Modern era
- 3 Abortion around the world
- 4 See also
- 5 References
- 6 Further reading
- 7 External links
The Vedic and smrti laws of India reflected a concern with preserving the male seed of the three upper castes; and the religious courts imposed various penances for the woman or excommunication for a priest who provided an abortion. In the epic Ramayana, there is description that the practice of abortion was being done by the surgeons or barbers in those days. The only evidence of the death penalty being mandated for abortion in the ancient laws is found in Assyrian Law, in the Code of Assura, c. 1075 BCE; and this is imposed only on a woman who procures an abortion against her husband's wishes. The first recorded evidence of induced abortion is from the Egyptian Ebers Papyrus in 1550 BCE.
Many of the methods employed in early cultures were non-surgical. Physical activities like strenuous labor, climbing, paddling, weightlifting, or diving were a common technique. Others included the use of irritant leaves, fasting, bloodletting, pouring hot water onto the abdomen, and lying on a heated coconut shell. In virtually all cultures, abortion techniques developed through observation, adaptation of obstetrical methods, and transculturation. Physical means of inducing abortion, including battery, exercise, and tightening the girdle were still often used as late as the Early Modern Period among English women.
Archaeological discoveries indicate early surgical attempts at the extraction of a fetus; however, such methods are not believed to have been common, given the infrequency with which they are mentioned in ancient medical texts.
An 8th-century Sanskrit text instructs women wishing to induce an abortion to sit over a pot of steam or stewed onions. The technique of massage abortion, involving the application of pressure to the pregnant abdomen, has been practiced in Southeast Asia for centuries. One of the bas reliefs decorating the temple of Angkor Wat in Cambodia, dated c. 1150, depicts a demon performing such an abortion upon a woman who has been sent to the underworld.
Japanese documents show records of induced abortion from as early as the 12th century. It became much more prevalent during the Edo period, especially among the peasant class, who were hit hardest by the recurrent famines and high taxation of the age. Statues of the Boddhisattva Jizo, erected in memory of an abortion, miscarriage, stillbirth, or young childhood death, began appearing at least as early as 1710 at a temple in Yokohama (see religion and abortion).
The native Māori people of New Zealand colonisation terminated pregnancies via miscarriage-inducing drugs, ceremonial methods, and girding of the abdomen with a restrictive belt. Another source claims that the Māori people did not practice abortion, for fear of Makutu, but did attempt abortion through the artificial induction of premature labor.
Much of what is known about the methods and practice of abortion in Greek and Roman history comes from early classical texts. Abortion, as a gynecological procedure, was primarily the province of women who were either midwives or well-informed laypeople. In his Theaetetus, Plato mentions a midwife's ability to induce abortion in the early stages of pregnancy. It is thought unlikely that abortion was punished in Ancient Greece. However, a fragment attributed to the poet Lysias "suggests that abortion was a crime in Athens against the husband, if his wife was pregnant when he died, since his unborn child could have claimed the estate.
The ancient Greeks relied upon the herb silphium as an abortifacient and contraceptive. The plant, as the chief export of Cyrene, was driven to extinction, but it is suggested that it might have possessed the same abortive properties as some of its closest extant relatives in the family Apiaceae. Silphium was so central to the Cyrenian economy that most of its coins were embossed with an image of the plant. Pliny the Elder (23–79 CE) cited the refined oil of common rue as a potent abortifacient. Serenus Sammonicus wrote of a concoction which consisted of rue, egg, and dill. Soranus, Dioscorides, Oribasius also detailed this application of the plant. Modern scientific studies have confirmed that rue indeed contains three abortive compounds. Birthwort, a herb used to ease childbirth, was also used to induce abortion. Galen included it in a potion formula in de Antidotis, while Dioscorides said it could be administered by mouth, or in the form of a vaginal pessary also containing pepper and myrrh.
The Greek playwright Aristophanes noted the abortifacient property of pennyroyal in 421 BCE, through a humorous reference in his comedy, Peace. Hippocrates (c. 460 – c. 370 BCE), the Greek physician, would advise a prostitute who became pregnant to jump up and down, touching her buttocks with her heels at each leap, so as to induce miscarriage. Other writings attributed to him describe instruments fashioned to dilate the cervix and curette inside of the uterus.
Soranus, a 2nd-century Greek physician, prescribed diuretics, emmenagogues, enemas, fasting, and bloodletting as safe abortion methods, although he advised against the use of sharp instruments to induce miscarriage, due to the risk of organ perforation. He also advised women wishing to abort their pregnancies to engage in energetic walking, carrying heavy objects, riding animals, and jumping so that the woman's heels were to touch her buttocks with each jump, which he described as the "Lacedaemonian Leap". He also offered a number of recipes for herbal baths, rubs, and pessaries. In De Materia Medica Libri Quinque, the Greek pharmacologist Dioscorides listed the ingredients of a draught called "abortion wine"– hellebore, squirting cucumber, and scammony– but failed to provide the precise manner in which it was to be prepared. Hellebore, in particular, is known to be abortifacient.
Tertullian, a 2nd- and 3rd-century Christian theologian, described surgical implements which were used in a procedure similar to the modern dilation and evacuation. One tool had a "nicely adjusted flexible frame" used for dilation, an "annular blade" used to curette, and a "blunted or covered hook" used for extraction. The other was a "copper needle or spike". He attributed ownership of such items to Hippocrates, Asclepiades, Erasistratus, Herophilus, and Soranus.
Aulus Cornelius Celsus, a 1st-century Roman encyclopedist, offered an extremely detailed account of a procedure to extract an already-dead fetus in his only surviving work, De Medicina. In Book 9 of Refutation of all Heresies, Hippolytus of Rome, another Christian theologian of the 3rd century, wrote of women tightly binding themselves around the middle so as to "expel what was being conceived".
Botanical preparations reputed to be abortifacient were common in classical literature and folk medicine. Such folk remedies, however, varied in effectiveness and were not without the risk of adverse effects. Some of the herbs used at times to terminate pregnancy are poisonous.
A list of plants which cause abortion was provided in De viribus herbarum, an 11th-century herbal written in the form of a poem, the authorship of which is incorrectly attributed to Aemilius Macer. Among them were rue, Italian catnip, savory, sage, soapwort, cyperus, white and black hellebore, and pennyroyal. Physicians in the Islamic world during the medieval period documented the use of abortifacients, commenting on their effectiveness and prevalence.
King's American Dispensatory of 1898 recommended a mixture of brewer's yeast and pennyroyal tea as "a safe and certain abortive". Pennyroyal has been known to cause complications when used as an abortifacient. In 1978 a pregnant woman from Colorado died after consuming 2 tablespoonfuls of pennyroyal essential oil which is known to be toxic. In 1994 a pregnant woman, unaware of an ectopic pregnancy that needed immediate medical care, drank a tea containing pennyroyal extract to induce abortion without medical help. She later died as a result of the untreated ectopic pregnancy, mistaking the symptoms for the abortifacient working.
A variety of juniper, known as savin, was mentioned frequently in European writings. In one case in England, a rector from Essex was said to have procured it for a woman he had impregnated in 1574; in another, a man advised his pregnant girlfriend to use black hellebore and savin be boiled together and drunk in milk, or else chopped madder boiled in beer. Other substances reputed to have been used by the English include Spanish fly, opium, watercress seed, iron sulphate, and iron chloride. Another mixture, not abortifacient, but rather intended to relieve missed abortion, contained dittany, hyssop, and hot water.
The root of worm fern, called "prostitute root" in French, was used in France and Germany; it was also recommended by a Greek physician in the 1st century. In German folk medicine, there was also an abortifacient tea, which included marjoram, thyme, parsley, and lavender. Other preparations of unspecified origin included crushed ants, the saliva of camels, and the tail hairs of black-tailed deer dissolved in the fat of bears.
Attitudes towards abortion
Aristotle wrote that, "[T]he line between lawful and unlawful abortion will be marked by the fact of having sensation and being alive." Before that point was reached, Aristotle did not regard abortion as the killing of something human. Aristotle considered the embryo to gain a human soul at 40 days if male and 90 days if female; before that, it had vegetable and animal souls.
The Oath, ascribed to Hippocrates, forbade the use of pessaries to induce abortion. Modern scholarship suggests that pessaries were banned because they were reported to cause vaginal ulcers. This specific prohibition has been interpreted by some medical scholars as prohibiting abortion in a broader sense than by pessary.
One such interpretation was by Scribonius Largus, a Roman medical writer: "Hippocrates, who founded our profession, laid the foundation for our discipline by an oath in which it was proscribed not to give a pregnant woman a kind of medicine that expels the embryo or fetus." Other medical scholars disagree, believing that Hippocrates sought to discourage physicians from trying dangerous methods to abort a fetus. This may be born out by the fact that the oath originally also prohibited surgery (at the time, it was far more dangerous, and surgeons were a separate profession from physicians).
Soranus acknowledges two parties among physicians: those who would not perform abortions, citing the Hippocratic Oath, and the other party, his own. Soranus recommended abortion in cases involving health complications as well as emotional immaturity, and provided detailed suggestions in his work Gynecology.
Punishment for abortion in the Roman Republic was generally inflicted as a violation of the father's right to dispose of his offspring.:3 Because of the influence of Stoicism, which did not view the fetus as a person, the Romans did not punish abortion as homicide. Although abortion was commonly accepted in Rome, around 211 CE emperors Septimius Severus and Caracalla banned abortion as infringing on parental rights; temporary exile was the punishment. Attitudes began to change with the spread of Christianity.
The 3rd-century legal compilation Pauli sententiae (attributed to Julius Paulus Prudentissimus) wrote: "Those who give an abortifacient or a love potion, and do not do this deceitfully, nevertheless, [because] this sets a bad example, the humiliores [those of a lower status, e.g., freed slaves] will be banned to a mine, and the honestiores [those of higher status, e.g., patricians] will be banned to an island after having forfeited (part of) their property, and if on account of that a woman or man perishes, then they [Pharr: the giver] will receive the death penalty." This seems to refer more to the killing of the woman who takes the abortifacient rather than to the killing of the fetus itself.
The Roman jurist Ulpian wrote in the Digest: "An unborn child is considered being born, as far as it concerns his profits." Despite this, abortion continued to be practiced "with little or no sense of shame".
Main article: Christianity and Abortion
The Bible's Exodus 21:22–24 describes two men fighting and accidentally hitting a pregnant women's stomach causing a premature birth that does not result in further injury as a non-capital offense and a "non-serious injury", unless it results in the crime of murder. Commentators such as Bruce Waltke have presented this as evidence that "God does not regard the fetus as a soul". C. Everett Koop disagreed with this interpretation. Numbers 5:11-31 describes the test of the unfaithful wife. If a man is suspicious of his wife's fidelity, he would take her to the high priest. The priest would make a substance for the woman to drink made from water and "dust from the tabernacle floor". If she had been unfaithful "her abdomen will swell and her womb will miscarry, and she will become a curse." If she was innocent the drink had no effect. Other translations do not mention miscarriage. 
|Part of a series of articles on|
and the Catholic Church
The early Christian work called the Didache (before 100 CE) says: "do not murder a child by abortion or kill a new-born infant." Tertullian, a 2nd- and 3rd-century Christian theologian argued that abortion should be performed only in cases in which abnormal positioning of the fetus in the womb would endanger the life of the pregnant woman. Saint Augustine, in Enchiridion, makes passing mention of surgical procedures being performed to remove fetuses which have died in utero.
Saint Augustine believed that abortion of a fetus animatus, a fetus with human limbs and shape, was murder. However, his beliefs on earlier-stage abortion were similar to Aristotle's, though he could neither deny nor affirm whether such partially formed fetuses would be resurrected as full people at the time of the Second Coming.
- "Now who is there that is not rather disposed to think that unformed abortions perish, like seeds that have never fructified?"
- "And therefore the following question may be very carefully inquired into and discussed by learned men, though I do not know whether it is in man's power to resolve it: At what time the infant begins to live in the womb: whether life exists in a latent form before it manifests itself in the motions of the living being. To deny that the young who are cut out limb by limb from the womb, lest if they were left there dead the mother should die too, have never been alive, seems too audacious."
The Leges Henrici Primi, written c. 1115, treated pre-quickening abortion as a misdemeanor, and post-quickening abortion as carrying a lesser penalty than homicide. "Quickening", a term often used interchangeably with "ensoulment" or "animation", was associated with the first movement of the fetus in utero. This movement is generally felt by women sometime in the third to fifth month of pregnancy. Midwives who performed abortions were accused of committing witchcraft in Malleus Maleficarum (The Hammer of Witches), published in 1487 as a witch-hunting manual in Germany.
Currently, the Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Evangelical Protestant and some mainline Protestant churches oppose abortion in varying degrees, while other mainline Protestant churches favor – also in varying degrees – permitting the practice.
From a Jewish perspective from biblical times, abortion is considered from a social perspective more than from a theological perspective. The mother's life is considered as a priority.
The examples and perspective in this section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (April 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
19th-century medicine saw tremendous advances in the fields of surgery, anaesthesia, and sanitation. Social attitudes towards abortion shifted in the context of a backlash against the women's rights movement. Abortion had previously been widely practiced and legal under common law in early pregnancy (until quickening), but the English-speaking world passed laws against abortion at all stages of pregnancy.
There were a number of factors that contributed to this shift in opinion about abortion in the early 19th century. In the United States, where physicians were the leading advocates of abortion criminalization laws, some of them argued that advances in medical knowledge showed that quickening was neither more nor less crucial in the process of gestation than any other step, and thus if one opposes abortion after quickening, one should oppose it before quickening as well.
Practical reasons also influenced the medical field to impose anti-abortion laws. For one, abortion providers tended to be untrained and not members of medical societies. In an age where the leading doctors in the nation were attempting to standardize the medical profession, these "irregulars" were considered a nuisance to public health. The "irregulars" were also disliked by the more formalized medical profession because they were competition, and often cheap competition. Though the physicians' campaign against abortion began in the early 1800s, little progress was made in the United States until after the Civil War.
The English law on abortion was first codified in legislation under sections 1 and 2 of Malicious Shooting or Stabbing Act 1803. The Bill was proposed by the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Edward Law, 1st Baron Ellenborough to clarify the law relating to abortion and was the first law to explicitly outlaw it. The Act provided that it was an offence for any person to perform or cause an abortion. The punishment for performing or attempting to perform a post quickening abortion was the death penalty (section 1) and otherwise was transportation for fourteen years (section 2). In 19th-century America, there was little regulation of abortion, in the tradition of English common law, pre quickening abortions were considered at most a misdemeanor. These cases proved difficult to prosecute as the testimony of the mother was usually the only means to determine when quickening had occurred.
The law was amended in 1828 and 1837 – the latter removed the distinction between women who were quick with child (late pregnancy) and those who were not. It also eliminated the death penalty as a possible punishment. The latter half of the 19th century saw abortion become increasingly punished. One writer justified this by claiming that the number of abortions among married women had increased markedly since 1840. The Offences against the Person Act 1861 created a new preparatory offence of procuring poison or instruments with intent to procure abortion. During the 1860s however abortion services were available in New York, New Orleans, Cincinnati, Louisville, Cleveland, Chicago and Indianapolis; with estimates of one abortion for every 4 live births .
Anti-abortion statutes began to appear in the United States from the 1820s. In 1821, a Connecticut law targeted apothecaries who sold poisons to women for purposes of abortion; and New York made post-quickening abortions a felony and pre-quickening abortions a misdemeanor eight years later. Criminalization accelerated from the late 1860s, through the efforts of concerned legislators, doctors, and the American Medical Association. In 1873, the Comstock Law prohibited any methods of production or publication of information pertaining to the procurement of abortion, the prevention of conception and the prevention of venereal disease, even to students of medicine. By 1909 the penalty for violating these laws became a $5000 fine and up to five years imprisonment. By 1910 nearly every state had anti-abortion laws, but these were unevenly enforced, at best.:80–112
In contrast, in France social perceptions of abortion started to change. In the first half of the 19th century, abortion was viewed as the last resort for pregnant but unwed women. But as writers began to write about abortion in terms of family planning for married women, the practice of abortion was reconceptualized as a logical solution to unwanted pregnancies resulting from ineffectual contraceptives. The formulation of abortion as a form of family planning for married women was made "thinkable" because both medical and non-medical practitioners agreed on the relative safety of the procedure.
From 1870 there was a steady decline in fertility in England, linked by some commentators not to a rise in the use of artificial contraception but to more traditional methods such as withdrawal and abstinence. This was linked to changes in the perception of the relative costs of childrearing. Of course, women did find themselves with unwanted pregnancies. Abortifacients were discreetly advertised and there was a considerable body of folklore about methods of inducing miscarriages. Amongst working-class women violent purgatives were popular, pennyroyal, aloes and turpentine were all used. Other methods to induce miscarriage were very hot baths and gin, extreme exertion, a controlled fall down a flight of stairs, or veterinary medicines. So-called 'backstreet' abortionists were fairly common, although their bloody efforts could be fatal. Estimates of the number of illegal abortions performed in England varied widely: by one estimate, 100,000 women made efforts to procure a miscarriage in 1914, usually by drugs.
In New York, surgical abortion in 1800s carried a death rate of 30% regardless of hospital setting, and the AMA launched an anti-abortion campaign that resulted in abortion becoming the exclusive domain of doctors . A paper published in 1870 on the abortion services to be found in Syracuse, New York, concluded that the method most often practiced there during this time was to flush inside of the uterus with injected water. The article's author, Ely Van de Warkle, claimed this procedure was affordable even to a maid, as a man in town offered it for $10 on an installment plan. Other prices which 19th-century abortion providers are reported to have charged were much more steep. In Britain, it could cost from 10 to 50 guineas, or 5% of the yearly income of a lower middle class household.
A rash of unexplained miscarriages in Sheffield, England were attributed to lead poisoning caused by the metal pipes which fed the city's water supply. Soon, women began using diachylon, a substance with a high concentration of lead, as an abortifacient. In 1898, a woman confessed to having used diachylon to induce a miscarriage. The use of diachylon became prevalent in the English Midlands up until World War I. Criminal investigation of an abortionist in Calgary, Alberta in 1894 revealed through chemical analysis that the concoction he had supplied to a man seeking an abortifacient contained Spanish fly.
Dr. Evelyn Fisher wrote of how women living in a mining town in Wales during the 1920s used candles intended for Roman Catholic ceremonies to dilate the cervix in an effort to self-induce abortion. Similarly, the use of candles and other objects, such as glass rods, penholders, curling irons, spoons, sticks, knives, and catheters was reported during the 19th century in the United States. Women of Jewish descent in Lower East Side, Manhattan are said to have carried the ancient Indian practice of sitting over a pot of steam into the early 20th century. Some commentators maintained that abortion remained a dangerous procedure into the early 20th century, more dangerous than childbirth until about 1930. But others have said that in the 19th century early abortions under the hygienic conditions in which midwives usually worked were relatively safe.:25 :4:59 :223 In addition, some authors have written that, despite improved medical procedures, the period from the 1930s until legalization also saw more zealous enforcement of anti-abortion laws, and concomitantly an increasing control of abortion providers by organized crime.
Advertising for abortifacients and abortion services
Despite bans enacted on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, access to abortion continued, as the disguised advertisement of abortion services, abortion-inducing devices, and abortifacient medicines in the Victorian era would seem to suggest. Apparent print ads of this nature were found in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. A British Medical Journal writer who replied to newspaper ads peddling relief to women who were "temporarily indisposed" in 1868 found that over half of them were in fact promoting abortion.
A few examples of surreptitiously marketed abortifacients include "Farrer's Catholic Pills", "Hardy's Woman's Friend", "Dr. Peter's French Renovating Pills", "Lydia Pinkham's Vegetable Compound", and "Madame Drunette's Lunar Pills". Patent medicines which claimed to treat "female complaints" often contained such ingredients as pennyroyal, tansy, and savin. Abortifacient products were sold under the promise of "restor[ing] female regularity" and "removing from the system every impurity". In the vernacular of such advertising, "irregularity", "obstruction", "menstrual suppression", and "delayed period" were understood to be euphemistic references to the state of pregnancy. As such, some abortifacients were marketed as menstrual regulatives.
Beecham's Pills were marketed primarily as a laxative from 1842. They were invented by Thomas Beecham from St Helens, Lancashire, England. The pills were a combination of aloe, ginger, and soap, with some other more minor ingredients. The popularity of the pills produced a wide range of testimonials that were used in advertising. The poet William Topaz McGonagall wrote a poem advertising the pills, giving his recommendation in verse. Beecham's expenditure on advertising went from £22,000 to £95,000 in the 1880s. An 1897 advertisement in the Christian Herald edition for Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee said: "Worth a guinea a box. Beecham's Pills for all bilious and nervous disorders such as Sick Headache, Constipation, Weak Stomach, Impaired Digestion, Disordered Liver and Female Ailments. The sale is now 6 million boxes per annum." The text was printed alongside a picture of a young woman at a beach and was captioned "What are the wild waves saying? Try Beecham's Pills."
"Old Dr. Gordon's Pearls of Health", produced by a drug company in Montreal, "cure[d] all suppressions and irregularities" if "used monthly". However, a few ads explicitly warned against the use of their product by women who were expecting, or listed miscarriage as its inevitable side effect. The copy for "Dr. Peter's French Renovating Pills" advised, "... pregnant females should not use them, as they invariably produce a miscarriage ...", and both "Dr. Monroe's French Periodical Pills" and "Dr. Melveau's Portuguese Female Pills" were "sure to produce a miscarriage". F.E. Karn, a man from Toronto, in 1901 cautioned women who thought themselves pregnant not to use the pills he advertised as "Friar's French Female Regulator" because they would "speedily restore menstrual secretions." Historian Ann Hibner Koblitz comments that "Nineteenth-century customers would have understood this 'warning' exactly as the sellers intended: as an advertisement for an abortifacient preparation.":44
In the mid 1930s abortifacients drugs were marketed in the United States to women by various companies under various names such as Molex Pills and Cote Pills. Since birth control devices and abortifacients were illegal to market and sell at the time, they were offered to women who were "delayed". The recommended dosage constituted seven grains of ergotin a day. These pills generally contained ingredients such as ergotin, aloes, Black Hellebore. The efficacy and safety of these pills are unknown. In 1940 the FTC deemed them unsafe and ineffective and demanded that these companies cease and desist selling these product.
A well-known example of a Victorian-era abortionist was Madame Restell, or Ann Lohman, who over a forty-year period illicitly provided both surgical abortion and abortifacient pills in the northern United States. She began her business in New York during the 1830s, and, by the 1840s, had expanded to include franchises in Boston and Philadelphia. It is estimated that by 1870 her annual expenditure on advertising alone was $60,000. Because of her reputation, Restellism became a synonym for abortion.
One ad for Restell's medical services, printed in the New York Sun, promised that she could offer the "strictest confidence on complaints incidental to the female frame" and that her "experience and knowledge in the treatment of cases of female irregularity, [was] such as to require but a few days to effect a perfect cure". Another, addressed to married women, asked the question, "Is it desirable, then, for parents to increase their families, regardless of consequences to themselves, or the well-being of their offspring, when a simple, easy, healthy, and certain remedy is within our control?" Advertisements for the "Female Monthly Regulating Pills" she also sold vowed to resolve "all cases of suppression, irregularity, or stoppage of the menses, however obdurate". Madame Restell was an object of criticism in both the respectable and penny presses. She was first arrested in 1841, but, it was her final arrest by Anthony Comstock which led to her suicide on the day of her trial April 1, 1878.
Such advertising aroused criticisms of quackery and immorality. The safety of many nostrums was suspect and the efficacy of others non-existent. Horace Greeley, in a New York Herald editorial written in 1871, denounced abortion and its promotion as the "infamous and unfortunately common crime– so common that it affords a lucrative support to a regular guild of professional murderers, so safe that its perpetrators advertise their calling in the newspapers". Although the paper in which Greeley wrote accepted such advertisements, others, such as the New York Tribune, refused to print them. Elizabeth Blackwell, the first woman to obtain a Doctor of Medicine in the United States, also lamented how such ads led to the contemporary synonymity of "female physician" with "abortionist".
Turning point in abortion legislation
Abortifacient advertising was highly effective in the United States, though apparently less so across the Atlantic. Contemporary estimates of mid-19th century abortion rates in the United States suggest between 20% and 25% of all pregnancies in the United States during that era ended in abortion. This era also saw a marked shift in those who were obtaining abortions. Before the start of the 19th century, most abortions were sought by unmarried women who had become pregnant out of wedlock. But, out of 54 abortion cases published in American medical journals between 1839 and 1880, over half were sought by married women, and of the married women well over 60 percent already had at least one child. In the post-Civil War era, much of the blame was placed on the burgeoning women's rights movement.
Many feminists of the era were opposed to abortion. In The Revolution, operated by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, an anonymous contributor signing "A" wrote in 1869 about the subject, arguing that instead of merely attempting to pass a law against abortion, the root cause must also be addressed. Simply passing an anti-abortion law would, the writer stated, "be only mowing off the top of the noxious weed, while the root remains. [...] No matter what the motive, love of ease, or a desire to save from suffering the unborn innocent, the woman is awfully guilty who commits the deed. It will burden her conscience in life, it will burden her soul in death; But oh! thrice guilty is he who drove her to the desperation which impelled her to the crime." To many feminists of this era, abortion was regarded as an undesirable necessity forced upon women by thoughtless men. Even the "free love" wing of the feminist movement refused to advocate abortion and treated the practice as an example of the hideous extremes to which modern marriage was driving women. Marital rape and the seduction of unmarried women were societal ills which feminists believed caused the need to abort, as men did not respect women's right to abstinence.
Socialist feminists tended to be more sympathetic to the need for abortion options for the poor, and indeed socialist feminist doctors, such as Marie Equi, Madeleine Pelletier, and William J. Robinson, themselves performed low-cost or free abortions for poor women.
Abortion law reform campaign
The movement towards the liberalization of abortion law emerged in the 1920s and '30s in the context of the victories that had been recently won in the area of birth control. Campaigners including Marie Stopes in England and Margaret Sanger in the US had succeeded in bringing the issue into the open, and birth control clinics were established which offered family planning advice and contraceptive methods to women in need.
In 1929, the Infant Life Preservation Act was passed in Britain, which amended the law (Offences against the Person Act 1861) so that an abortion carried out in good faith, for the sole purpose of preserving the life of the mother, would not be an offence.
Stella Browne was a leading birth control campaigner, who increasingly began to venture into the more contentious issue of abortion in the 1930s. Browne's beliefs were heavily influenced by the work of Havelock Ellis, Edward Carpenter and other sexologists. She came to strongly believe that working women should have the choice to become pregnant and to terminate their pregnancy while they worked in the horrible circumstances surrounding a pregnant woman who was still required to do hard labour during her pregnancy. In this case she argued that doctors should give free information about birth control to women that wanted to know about it. This would give women agency over their own circumstances and allow them to decide whether they wanted to be mothers or not.
In the late 1920s Browne began a speaking tour around England, providing information about her beliefs on the need for accessibility of information about birth control for women, women’s health problems, problems related to puberty and sex education and high maternal morbidity rates among other topics. These talks urged women to take matters of their sexuality and their health into their own hands. She became increasingly interested in her view of the woman’s right to terminate their pregnancies, and in 1929 she brought forward her lecture "The Right to Abortion" in front of the World Sexual Reform Congress in London. In 1931 Browne began to develop her argument for women’s right to decide to have an abortion. She again began touring, giving lectures on abortion and the negative consequences that followed if women were unable to terminate pregnancies of their own choosing such as: suicide, injury, permanent invalidism, madness and blood-poisoning.
Other prominent feminists, including Frida Laski, Dora Russell, Joan Malleson and Janet Chance began to champion this cause – the cause broke dramatically into the mainstream in July 1932 when the British Medical Association council formed a committee to discuss making changes to the laws on abortion. On 17 February 1936, Janet Chance, Alice Jenkins and Joan Malleson established the Abortion Law Reform Association as the first advocacy organisation for abortion liberalization. The association promoted access to abortion in the United Kingdom and campaigned for the elimination of legal obstacles. In its first year ALRA recruited 35 members, and by 1939 had almost 400 members.
The ALRA was very active between 1936 and 1939 sending speakers around the country to talk about Labour and Equal Citizenship and attempted, though most often unsuccessfully, to have letters and articles published in newspapers. They became the most popular when a member of the ALRA’s Medico-Legal Committee received the case of a fourteen-year-old girl who had been raped, and received a termination of this pregnancy from Dr. Joan Malleson, a progenitor of the ALRA. This case gained a lot of publicity, however once the war began, the case was tucked away and the cause again lost its importance to the public.
In 1938, Joan Malleson precipitated one of the most influential cases in British abortion law when she referred a pregnant fourteen-year-old rape victim to gynaecologist Aleck Bourne. He performed an abortion, then illegal, and was put on trial on charges of procuring abortion. Bourne was eventually acquitted in Rex v. Bourne as his actions were "an example of disinterested conduct in consonance with the highest traditions of the profession". This court case set a precedent that doctors could not be prosecuted for performing an abortion in cases where pregnancy would probably cause "mental and physical wreck".
Finally, the Birkett Committee, established in 1937 by the British government "to inquire into the prevalence of abortion, and the law relating thereto", recommended a change to abortion laws two years later. The intervention of World War II meant that all plans were shelved.
Liberalization of abortion law
The Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic was the first government to legalize abortion and make it available on request, often for no cost. The Soviet government hoped to provide access to abortion in a safe environment performed by a trained doctor instead of babki. While this campaign was extremely effective in the urban areas (as much as 75% of abortions in Moscow were performed in hospitals by 1925), it had much less effect on rural regions where there was neither access to doctors, transportation, or both and where women relied on traditional medicine. In the countryside in particular, women continued to see babki, midwives, hairdressers, nurses, and others for the procedure after abortion was legalized in the Soviet Union.
From 1936 until 1955 the Soviet Union made abortion illegal (except for medically recommended cases) again, stemming largely from Joseph Stalin’s worries about population growth. Stalin wanted to encourage population growth, as well as place a stronger emphasis on the importance of the family unit to communism.
During the Spanish Civil War, on 25 December 1936, in Catalonia, free abortion was legalized during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy with a decree signed by Josep Tarradellas, First Minister of the Government of Catalonia, and published on 9 January 1937 (Diari Oficial de la Generalitat de Catalunya, núm.9).
In Britain, the Abortion Law Reform Association continued its campaigning after the War, and this, combined with broad social changes brought the issue of abortion back into the political arena in the 1960s. President of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists John Peel chaired the committee advising the British Government on what became the 1967 Abortion Act. On the grounds of reducing the amount of disease and death associated with illegal abortion, the Abortion Act allowed for legal abortion on a number of grounds, including to prevent grave permanent injury to the woman's physical or mental health, to avoid injury to the physical or mental health of the woman or her existing child(ren) if the pregnancy was still under 28 weeks, or if the child was likely to be severely physically or mentally handicapped. The free provision of abortions was provided through the National Health Service.
In America an abortion reform movement emerged in the 1960s. In 1963 The Society for Human Abortions was formed, providing women with information on how to obtain and perform abortions. In 1964 Gerri Santoro of Connecticut died trying to obtain an illegal abortion and her photo became the symbol of the pro-choice movement. Some women's rights activist groups developed their own skills to provide abortions to women who could not obtain them elsewhere. As an example, in Chicago, a group known as "Jane" operated a floating abortion clinic throughout much of the 1960s. Women seeking the procedure would call a designated number and be given instructions on how to find "Jane".
In the late 1960s, a number of organizations were formed to mobilize opinion both against and for the legalization of abortion. The forerunner of the NARAL Pro-Choice America was formed in 1969 to oppose restrictions on abortion and expand access to abortion. In late 1973 NARAL became the National Abortion Rights Action League.
In 1967, 21 members of the clergy announced in the New York Times that they would help women find safe abortion providers.
In 1967, Colorado became the first state to decriminalize abortion in cases of rape, incest, or in which pregnancy would lead to permanent physical disability of the woman. Similar laws were passed in California, Oregon, and North Carolina. In 1970, Hawaii became the first state to legalize abortions on the request of the woman, and New York repealed its 1830 law and allowed abortions up to the 24th week of pregnancy. Similar laws were soon passed in Alaska and Washington. A law in Washington, D.C., which allowed abortion to protect the life or health of the woman, was challenged in the Supreme Court in 1971 in United States v. Vuitch. The court upheld the law, deeming that "health" meant "psychological and physical well-being", essentially allowing abortion in Washington, DC. By the end of 1972, 13 states had a law similar to that of Colorado, while Mississippi allowed abortion in cases of rape or incest only and Alabama and Massachusetts allowed abortions only in cases where the woman's physical health was endangered.
The landmark judicial ruling of the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade ruled that a Texas statute forbidding abortion except when necessary to save the life of the mother was unconstitutional. The Court arrived at its decision by concluding that the issue of abortion and abortion rights falls under the right to privacy.
The Court held that a right to privacy existed and included the right to have an abortion. The court found that a mother had a right to abortion until viability, a point to be determined by the abortion doctor. After viability a woman can obtain an abortion for health reasons, which the Court defined broadly to include psychological well-being.
From the 1970s, and the spread of second-wave feminism, abortion and reproductive rights became unifying issues among various women's rights groups in Canada, the United States, the Netherlands, Britain, Norway, France, Germany, and Italy.
Development of contemporary abortion methods
Although prototypes of the modern curette are referred to in ancient texts, the instrument which is used today was initially designed in France in 1723, but was not applied specifically to a gynecological purpose until 1842. Dilation and curettage has been practiced since the late 19th century.
The 20th century saw improvements in abortion technology, increasing its safety, and reducing its side-effects. Vacuum devices, first described by the Scottish obstetrician James Young Simpson in the 19th century, allowed for the development of suction-aspiration abortion. The process was improved by the Russian doctor S. G. Bykov in 1927, where the method was used during its period of liberal abortion laws from 1920 to 1936. The technology was also used in China and Japan before being introduced to Britain and the United States in the 1960s. The invention of the Karman cannula, a flexible plastic cannula which replaced earlier metal models in the 1970s, reduced the occurrence of perforation and made suction-aspiration methods possible under local anesthesia.
In 1971, Lorraine Rothman and Carol Downer, founding members of the feminist self-help movement, invented the Del-Em, a safe, cheap suction device that made it possible for people with minimal training to perform early abortions called menstrual extraction. During the mid-1990s in the United States the medical community showed renewed interest in manual vacuum aspiration as a method of early surgical abortion. This resurgence is due to technological advances that permit early pregnancy detection (as soon as a week after conception) and a growing popular demand for safe, effective early abortion options, both surgical and medical. An innovator in the development of early surgical abortion services is Jerry Edwards, a physician, who developed a protocol in which women are offered an abortion using a handheld vacuum syringe as soon as a positive pregnancy test is received. This protocol also allows the early detection of an ectopic pregnancy.
Intact dilation and extraction was developed by Dr. James McMahon in 1983. It resembles a procedure used in the 19th century to save a woman's life in cases of obstructed labor, in which the fetal skull was first punctured with a perforator, then crushed and extracted with a forceps-like instrument, known as a cranioclast.
In 1980, researchers at Roussel Uclaf in France developed mifepristone, a chemical compound which works as an abortifacient by blocking hormone action. It was first marketed in France under the trade name Mifegyne in 1988.
Abortion around the world
At various times abortion has been banned or restricted in countries around the world. Multiple scholars have noticed that in many cases, this has caused women to seek dangerous, illegal abortions underground or inspired trips abroad for "reproductive tourism". Half of the world's current deaths due to unsafe abortions occur in Asia.
But other authors have written that illegality has not always meant that abortions were unsafe. For example, in the U.S. in the 19th century early abortions under the hygienic conditions in which midwives usually worked were relatively safe.:25:4:59 :223
In the early 1950s, the Chinese government made abortion illegal, with punishments for those who received or performed illegal abortions written into the law. These restrictions were seen as the government's way of emphasizing the importance of population growth.
As the decade went on, however, the laws were relaxed with the intent of reducing the number of deaths and lifelong injuries women sustained due to illegal abortions as well as serving as a form of population control when used in conjunction with birth control. In the early 1980s, the state implemented a form of family planning which used abortion as a "back-up method"; and in 2005, there has been legislation trying to curb sex-selective abortion.
India enforced the Indian Penal Code from 1860 to 1971, criminalizing abortion and punishing both the practitioners and the women who sought out the procedure. As a result, women died in an attempt to obtain illegal abortions from unqualified midwives and "doctors". Abortion was made legal under specific circumstances in 1971, but as scholar S. Chandrasekhar notes, lower class women still find themselves at a greater risk of injury or death as a result of a botched abortion.
Japan is known today worldwide for its acceptance of abortion. It is estimated that two-thirds of Japanese women have an abortion by age forty, partially due to former government restrictions on contraceptive pills on 'public hygiene grounds'.
The Eugenics Protection Law of 1948 made abortion on demand legal up to twenty-two weeks' gestation so long as the woman's health was endangered; in 1949, this law was extended to consider the risk the child's birth would place on a woman's economic welfare. Originally, each case would have to be approved by a local eugenics council, but this was removed from the law in 1952, making the decision a private one between a woman and her physician.
In 1964, the creation of the conservative right-wing nationalist political lobbying group called Seicho-no-Ie brought about a strong opposition to the abortion laws. This campaign reached its peak strength in the early 1980s, but ultimately failed in 1983.
In 1957, Romania legalized abortion, but in 1966, after a decline in the national birthrate, Nicolae Ceauşescu approved Decree 770, which criminalized abortion and encouraged childbirth. As a result of this decree, women in want of abortion turned to illegal procedures that caused the deaths of over 9,000 women and left unwanted children abandoned in orphanages. Abortion remained illegal until 1989, when the decree was overturned.
There was intense public debate throughout the 1980s and 1990s over legal abortion reform. These debates portrayed abortion as un-Buddhist and anti-religious; abortion opponents ultimately labeled it as a form of Western corruption that was inherently anti-Thai and threatened the integrity of the nation. Despite this, in 2006, abortions became legal in cases of rape or foetal impairment. Mental health also became a factor in determining the legality of an abortion procedure. The strict regulations involved in qualifying for a legal abortion, however, cause approximately 300,000 women a year to seek illegal avenues according to scholar Andrea Whittaker, with the poorest undergoing the most dangerous of procedures.
- Brodie, Janet Farrell (1997). Contraception and abortion in nineteenth-century America. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. p. 254. ISBN 0-8014-8433-2. OCLC 37699745.
- Constantin-Iulian Damian (January–March 2010). "Abortion from the Perspective of Eastern Religions: Hinduism and Buddhism" (PDF). Romanian Journal of Bioethics. 8 (1).
- Valmiki Ramayana Sunderkand 28th Sarga 6th Shlok https://www.valmiki.iitk.ac.in/sloka?field_kanda_tid=5&language=dv&field_sarga_value=28
-  Ancient History Sourcebook: The Code of the Assura, c. 1075 BC
- Potts, Malcolm; Martha Campbell (2002). "History of Contraception" (PDF). Gynecology and Obstetrics. 6 (8). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2003-07-01. Retrieved 2013-09-12.Potts, Malcolm; Martha Campbell (2009). "History of Contraception". GLOWM: The Global Library Of Women's Medicine. doi:10.3843/GLOWM.10376. ISSN 1756-2228. Retrieved 2011-09-07.
- Devereux, G (1967). "A typological study of abortion in 350 primitive, ancient, and pre-industrial societies". In Harold Rosen (ed.). Abortion in America: Medical, psychiatric, legal, anthropological, and religious considerations. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press. OCLC 187445.
- Devereux, George (1976). A Study of Abortion in Primitive Societies. International Universities Press. ISBN 978-0823662456.
- Macfarlane, Alan (2002). "Abortion methods in England" (PDF). The Savage Wars of Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 1-4039-0432-4. OCLC 50714989. Retrieved 2008-12-13.
- Doerfler, Stephanie. "Abortion". Archived from the original on June 29, 2007. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
- London, Kathleen (1982). "The History of Birth Control". The Changing American Family: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Yale University. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
- Obayashi M (December 1982). "[Historical background of the acceptance of induced abortion]". Josanpu Zasshi (in Japanese). 36 (12): 1011–6. PMID 6759734.
- Brookes, Anne Page (September–December 1981). "Mizuko kuyō and Japanese Buddhism" (PDF). Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. 8 (3–4): 119–47. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2004-05-03. Retrieved 2008-12-13.
- Hunton RB (December 1977). "Maori abortion practices in pre and early European New Zealand". The New Zealand Medical Journal. 86 (602): 567–70. PMID 273782.
- Gluckman LK (June 1981). "Abortion in the nineteenth century Maori: a historical and ethnopsychiatric review". The New Zealand Medical Journal. 93 (685): 384–6. PMID 7019788.
- Depierri, Kate P. (March 1968). "One Way of Unearthing the Past". The American Journal of Nursing. Lippincott Williams &. 68 (3): 521–524. doi:10.2307/3453443. JSTOR 3453443. PMID 4865614.
- Plato (1921) [c. 369 BC]. "149d". Theaetetus. in Harold North Fowler. Plato in Twelve Volumes. 12. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Johannes M. Röskamp, Christian Perspectives On Abortion-Legislation In Past And Present (GRIN Verlag 2005 ISBN 978-3-640-56931-1
- Sallares, J. Robert (2003), "abortion", in Hornblower, Simon; Spawforth, Anthony (eds.), The Oxford Classical Dictionary (3rd ed.), Oxford: OxfordUP, p. 1, ISBN 978-0-19-860641-3
- Pliny, XXII, Ch. 49
- Hurst, W. Jeffrey; Deborah J. Hurst. "Rue (Ruta Graveolens)". Medicina Antiqua. The Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
- Riddle, John M. (1999). Eve's Herbs: A History of Contraception and Abortion in the West. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-27026-6. OCLC 46766844.[page needed]
- Young, Gordon (December 1995). "Lifestyle on Trial". Metro. Retrieved 2008-06-25.
- Lefkowitz, Mary R.; Maureen R. Fant (1992). "Intercourse, conception and pregnancy". Women's life in Greece & Rome: A source book in translation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 341. ISBN 0-8018-4475-4. Retrieved 2008-09-21.
- Klotz, John William (1973). "A Historical Summary of Abortion from Antiquity through Legalization" (PDF). A Christian view of abortion. St. Louis, Missouri: Concordia Publishing House. ISBN 0-570-06721-9. OCLC 750046. Retrieved 2008-09-21.
- Soranus. Gynaecology. 1.59–65.
- Riddle, John M. (1992). Contraception and abortion from the ancient world to the Renaissance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-16875-5. OCLC 24428750.[page needed]
- Hurst, W. Jeffrey; Deborah J. Hurst. "Hellebore". Medicina Antiqua. The Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
- Tertullian (1885) [c. 203]. "Tertullian Refutes, Physiologically, the Notion that the Soul is Introduced After Birth". A Treatise on the Soul. in Philip Schaff. Ante-Nicene Fathers. 3. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
- Celsus (1935). "Prooemium". In W. G. Spencer (ed.). De medicina. London: Heinemann. p. 457. OCLC 186696262. Retrieved 2008-12-13.
- Hippolytus (c. 1870). "The Personal History of Callistus; His Occupation ...". Refutation of all Heresies. in Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson. Ante-Nicene Fathers. 5. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
- Shaikh, Sa'diyya (2003). "Family Planning, Contraception, and Abortion in Islam: Undertaking Khilafa". In Daniel C. Maguire (ed.). Sacred Rights: The Case for Contraception and Abortion in World Religions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 107. ISBN 0-19-516001-0. OCLC 50080419.
- Felter, Harvey Wickes; John Uri Lloyd (1854). "Hedeoma (U. S. P.)—Hedeoma". King's American Dispensatory. Retrieved 2008-12-11.
- Pennyroyal poisoning
- Colorado death
- MedLinePlus. "American pennyroyal (Hedeoma pulegioides L.), European pennyroyal (Mentha pulegium L.)". Retrieved 2009-05-05.
- Charles T. Hildreth, MD (November 1834). "Fatal Poisoning by Oil of Tansy". The Medical Magazine. Boston: William D. Ticknor. 3 (7): 213.
From the days of Aristotle to the present time, a certain class of medical writers have recommended this plant as safe, and more or less efficacious, in cases involving a suppression of the catamenia.(Catamenia is blood or other material discharged from the uterus during menstruation.)
- Long, George (1870). "Abortio". In William Smith (ed.). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. 1. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. p. 2. Archived from the original on 2010-02-13.
- Aristotle (1944) [c. 325 BC]. "Politics". In H. Rackham (ed.). Aristotle in 23 Volumes. 21. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 7.1335b. ISBN 0-674-99291-1. OCLC 29752140.
- A companion to bioethics By Helga Kuhse, Peter Singer
- W. den Boer, Private Morality in Greece and Rome (Brill 1979 ISBN 978-90-04-05976-4), p. 272
- Riddle, John M. (August 1991). "Oral contraceptives and early-term abortifacients during classical antiquity and the Middle Ages". Past & Present. 132 (1): 3–32. doi:10.1093/past/132.1.3. JSTOR 650819. PMID 11656135. "Contrary to popular opinion, the ancient Hippocratic Oath did not prohibit abortions; the oath prohibited 'vaginal suppositories' presumably because of the ulcerations they were said to cause." Riddle is citing Soranus, p.13.
- Scribonius, Compositiones Praef. 5. 20–23 (Translated and cited in Riddle's history of contraception and abortion)
- Joffe, Carole (2009). M Paul; ES Lichtenberg; L Borgatta; DA Grimes; PG Stubblefield; MD Creinin (eds.). Management of Unintended and Abnormal Pregnancy (1st ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 2. ISBN 978-1-4443-1293-5.
- "Scribonius Largus"
- Soranus, Owsei Temkin (1956). Soranus' Gynecology. I.19.60: JHU Press. Retrieved 6 October 2015.
- Jeffrey H. Reiman, Abortion and the Ways We Value Life (Rowman and Littlefield 1998 ISBN 978-0-8476-9208-8), p, 19
- Pauli sententiae, PS 5.23.14 (BA PS 5.25.8).
- Hopkins, Keith (October 1965). "Contraception in the Roman Empire". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 8 (1): 124–151. doi:10.1017/S0010417500003935. JSTOR 177539. "We know that Romans practiced abortion with little or no sense of shame." Hopkins cites R. Hähnel's Der künstliche Abortus in Altertum, p. 127.
- Bruce Waltke, "The Old Testament and Birth Control", Christianity Today 13 no. 3 (1968) 3-6
- Carlson, Allan C. (December 31, 2011). Godly Seed: American Evangelicals Confront Birth Control, 1873-1973. Transaction. p. 154. ISBN 9781412846516.
- Cyril Charles Richardson, ed. (1953) [c. 150]. "Didache". Early Christian Fathers. Philadelphia: Westminster Press. OCLC 832987. Retrieved 2008-12-12.
- Augustine (1885) [c. 420]. "The Case of Abortive Conceptions". Enchiridion. in Philip Schaff. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. 3. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
- Robinson, B. A. (2000-05-28). "Roman Catholicism and abortion access: Pagan & Christian beliefs 400 BC −1980 AD". Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. Retrieved 2008-12-09.
- Augustine (1885) [c. 420]. "What Sins are Trivial and What Heinous is a Matter for God's Judgment". Enchiridion. in Philip Schaff. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. 3. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
- Augustine (1885) [c. 420]. "If They Have Ever Lived, They Must of Course Have Died, and Therefore, Shall Have a Share in the Resurrection of the Dead". Enchiridion. in Philip Schaff. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. 3. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
- Institoris, Heinrich; Jakob Sprenger (1971) . Montague Summers (ed.). The Malleus maleficarum of Heinrich Kramer and James Sprenger. New York City: Dover Publications. p. 66. ISBN 0-486-22802-9. OCLC 246623.
- Reagan, Leslie J. (1997). When Abortion Was a Crime: Women, Medicine, and Law in the United States, 1867-1973. University of California Press. p. 8.
- James C. Mohr (1978). Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy. Oxford University Press/. pp. 35–36.
- James C. Mohr (1978). Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy. Oxford University Press/. p. 34.
- James C. Mohr (1978). Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy. Oxford University Press/. p. 147.
- Alesha E. Doan (2007). Opposition and Intimidation:The abortion wars and strategies of political harassment. University of Michigan. p. 46.
- Transactions of the Washington Obstetrical and Gynecological Society
- g 2007, p. 46.
- Alford, Suzanne M. (2003). "Is Self-Abortion a Fundamental Right?". Duke Law Journal. 52 (5): 1011–29. JSTOR 1373127. PMID 12964572.
- Lewis, Jone Johnson. "Abortion History: A History of Abortion in the United States". Women's History section of About.com. About.com. Retrieved 2006-07-07.
- https://archive.org/stream/anthonycomstockh00bennuoft#page/1017/mode/1up Anthony Comstock: His Career of Cruelty and Crime A Chapter from "Champions of the Church". DeRobigne Mortimer Bennett. 1878.
- Doan 2007, p. 51.
- Reagan, Leslie J. (1997). When Abortion Was a Crime: Women, Medicine, and Law in the United States, 1867-1973. University of California Press.
- McLaren, Angus (Spring 1978). "Abortion in France: Women and the Regulation of Family Size 1800–1914". French Historical Studies. Duke University Press. 10 (3): 461–484 . doi:10.2307/286340. JSTOR 286340. PMID 11614490. Retrieved 2007-11-17.
Increasingly, writers in the latter half of the nineteenth century no longer referred to abortion as a last resort for the single, seduced girl but as a family planning measure employed by the married woman. As a result the very nature of the idea and practice of abortion was transformed.
- Doan 2007, p. 47.
- Van de Warker, Ely (1870). The detection of criminal abortion and a study of fœticidal drugs. Boston: James Campbell. Retrieved 2008-12-14.
- Beahen, William (1986). "Abortion and Infanticide in Western Canada 1874 to 1916: A Criminal Case Study". Historical Studies. The Canadian Catholic Historical Association. 53: 53–70. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
- King CR (1992). "Abortion in nineteenth century America: a conflict between women and their physicians". Womens Health Issues. 2 (1): 32–9. doi:10.1016/S1049-3867(05)80135-5. PMID 1628000. Archived from the original on February 2, 2009. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
- Abortion was more dangerous than childbirth throughout the 19th century. By 1930, medical procedures had improved for both childbirth and abortion but not equally, and induced abortion in the first trimester had become safer than childbirth. In 1973, Roe vs. Wade acknowledged that abortion in the first trimester was safer than childbirth.
• "The 1970s". Time communication 1940–1989: retrospective. Time Inc. 1989.
Blackmun was also swayed by the fact that most abortion prohibitions were enacted in the 19th century when the procedure was more dangerous than now.
• Will, George (1990). Suddenly: the American idea abroad and at home, 1986–1990. Free Press. p. 312. ISBN 0-02-934435-2.
• Lewis, J.; Shimabukuro, Jon O. (January 28, 2001). "Abortion Law Development: A Brief Overview". Congressional Research Service. Retrieved May 1, 2011.
• Schultz, David Andrew (2002). Encyclopedia of American law. Infobase Publishing. p. 1. ISBN 0-8160-4329-9.
• Population Information Program, George Washington University; Dept. of Medical and Public Affairs, Johns Hopkins University (1980). "Pregnancy termination". Population reports. Population Information Program, The Johns Hopkins University (7).
• Lahey, Joanna N. (September 24, 2009). "Birthing a Nation: Fertility Control Access and the 19th Century Demographic Transition". Colloquium. Pomona College.
- Gordon, Linda (2002). The Moral Property of Women. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 0252027647.
- Solinger, Rickie (1998), "Introduction", in Solinger, Rickie (ed.), Abortion Wars: A Half Century of Struggle, 1950-2000, University of California Press, pp. 1–9, ISBN 978-0520209527
- Bates, Jerome E.; Zawadzki, Edward S. (1964). Criminal Abortion: A Study in Medical Sociology. Charles C. Thomas. ISBN 9780398001094.
- Taussig, Frederick J. (1936). Abortion Spontaneous and Induced: Medical and Social Aspects. C. V. Mosby.
- Lee, Charles A. (1838), "Report of a trial for murder", American Journal of the Medical Sciences, XXII: 351–353
- Bailey, Benjamin (1896), "Induction of abortion and premature labor", North American Journal of Homeopathy, XI (3): 144–150
- Simpson, Keith (1947), Forensic Medicine, Edward Arnold Publishers, pp. 173–174
- Evans, Max (2002). Madam Millie: Bordellos from Silver City to Ketchikan. University of New Mexico Press. pp. 209–218, 230, 267–286, 305.
- Donner, James (1959). Women in Trouble: The Truth about Abortion in America. Monarch Books.
- Oakley, Ann (1984). The Captured Womb. Basil Blackwell. p. 91.
- Solinger, Rickie (1994). The Abortionist: A Woman Against the Law. The Free Press. pp. xi, 5, 16–17, 157–175.
- DeHullu, James. "Histories of Abortion". Archived from the original on November 18, 2008. Retrieved 2008-12-11.
- "Product Advertisements". American Women. Library of Congress. 2001. Retrieved 2008-12-11.
- McLaren, Angus (1978). "Birth control and abortion in Canada, 1870–1920". Canadian Historical Review. 59 (3): 319–40. doi:10.3138/CHR-059-03-02. PMID 11614314.
- Black, Barbara (2000-11-27). "Women win back reproductive rights". North Shore News. North Vancouver, British Columbia: Lower Mainland Publishing Group. Archived from the original on 2004-08-19. Retrieved 2008-12-11.
- McGonagall Online - Beecham's Pills
- T. C. Barker; R Harris (1954). A Merseyside Town in the Industrial Revolution 1750-1900. Liverpool University Press. pp. 378–9.
- Geoffrey Davis (1974). Interception of Pregnancy: Post-Conceptive Fertility Control, Emmenology Revisited. HarperCollins Publishers Australia.
- MacLaren, Angus; Arlene Tigar MacLaren (1986). The bedroom and the state: the changing practices and politics of contraception and abortion in Canada, 1880–1980. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart. ISBN 0-7710-5532-3. OCLC 256809754.[page needed]
- Koblitz, Ann Hibner (2014). Sex and Herbs and Birth Control: Women and Fertility Regulation Through the Ages. Kovalevskaia Fund.
- Federal Trade Commission (1941). "Federal Trade Commission Decisions". 30: 833–838.
- Dannenfelser, Marjorie (4 November 2015). "The Suffragettes Would Not Agree With Feminists Today on Abortion". TIME. Retrieved 4 November 2015.
- Olasky, Marvin N. (1988). "Crusading on Social and Political Issues: Personalization and Pesistence [sic]". Prodigal press: the anti-Christian bias of the American news media. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway Books. ISBN 0-89107-476-7. OCLC 17865217. Retrieved 2008-12-11.
- Richardson, Cynthia Watkins (2002). "In the Eye of Power: The Notorious Madam Restell" (PDF). Khronikos. University of Maine. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-12-17. Retrieved 2008-12-11.
- James C. Mohr (1978). Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy. Oxford University Press/. pp. 76–82.
- James C. Mohr (1978). Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy. Oxford University Press/. pp. 100–101.
- Gordon, Sarah Barringer. "Law and Everyday Death: Infanticide and the Backlash against Woman's Rights after the Civil War". Lives of the Law. Austin Sarat, Lawrence Douglas, and Martha Umphrey, Editors. (University of Michigan Press 2006) p.67
- Schiff, Stacy. "Desperately Seeking Susan". October 13, 2006 The New York Times'.' Retrieved February 5, 2009.
- "Marriage and Maternity". The Revolution. Susan B. Anthony. July 8, 1869. Retrieved 2009-04-21.
- Susan B. Anthony, "Marriage and Maternity", Archived 2011-10-05 at the Wayback Machine The Revolution (1869-07-08), via University Honors Program, Syracuse University.
- Federer, William. American Minute, page 81 (Amerisearch 2003).
- James C. Mohr (1978). Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy. Oxford University Press/. p. 110.
- James C. Mohr (1978). Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy. Oxford University Press/. p. 112.
- Allen, Ann Taylor (2005). Feminism and Motherhood in Western Europe, 1890-1970. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 98, 173, 218.
- Krieger, Nancy (1983), "Queen of the Bolsheviks: The Hidden History of Dr. Marie Equi", Radical America, 17 (5): 54–73
- Robinson, William J. (1931). Doctor Robinson and Saint Peter: How Dr. Robinson Entered the Heavenly Gates and Became St. Peter's Assistant. Eugenics Publishing. p. 25.
- HL Deb. Vol 72. 269.
- Hall, Lesley (2011). The Life and Times of Stella Browne: Feminist and Free Spirit. pp. 27–178.
- Jones, Greta. "Women and eugenics in Britain: The case of Mary Scharlieb, Elizabeth Sloan Chesser, and Stella Browne." Annals of Science 52 no. 5 (1995):481-502
- Rowbotham, Sheila (1977). A New World for Women: Stella Browne, social feminist. pp. 66–67.
- Hindell, Keith; Madeline Simms (1968). "How the Abortion Lobby Worked". The Political Quarterly: 271–272.
- R v Bourne  1 KB 687,  3 All ER 615, CCA
- Hyde, H. Montgomery (1965). Norman Birkett: The Life of Lord Birkett of Ulverston. Hamish Hamilton. p. 462. ASIN B000O8CESO. OCLC 255057963.
- Heer, David, "Abortion, Contraception, and Population Policy in the Soviet Union" Demography 2 (1965): 531-39.
- Alexandre Avdeev, Alain Blum, and Irina Troitskaya. "The History of Abortion Statistics in Russia and the USSR from 1900 to 1991". Population (English Edition) 7, (1995), 42.
- I.S. Kon, The Sexual Revolution in Russia: From the Age of the Czars to Today (New York: The Free Press, 1995), 61.
- Michaels, Paula, "Motherhood, Patriotism, and Ethnicity: Soviet Kazakhstan and the 1936 Abortion Ban". Feminist Studies 27 (2001): 309-11.
- Barbara Evans Clements, Barbara Alpern Engel, and Christine Worobec. Russia's Women: Accommodation, Resistance, Transformation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991), 260.
- Randall, Amy, "'Abortion Will Deprive You of Happiness!': Soviet Reproductive Politics in the Post-Stalin Era". Journal of Women's History 23 (2011): 13-38.
- La Segunda República despenalizó el aborto con la ley más avanzada de Europa, Público (España), Patricia Campello, 15/2/2014
- Cataluña tuvo durante la República la ley del aborto más progresista de Europa, El País, 13/2/1983
- Véase el texto del decreto Decreto de Regulación de la Interrupción Artificial del Embarazo, en cgtburgos; también el reportaje de José María Garat, publicó en Mundo Gráfico el 12 de mayo de 1937, descargable desde la Biblioteca Nacional de España -En Cataluña existe ya el aborto legal
- House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee. "Scientific Developments Relating to the Abortion Act 1967". 1 (2006-2007). Print.
- Alesha Doan (2007). Opposition and Intimidation: The Abortion Wars and Strategies of Political Harassment. University of Michigan Press. p. 58. ISBN 9780472069750.
- Johnson, Linnea. "Something Real: Jane and Me. Memories and Exhortations of a Feminist Ex-Abortionist". CWLU Herstory Project. Archived from the original on 2011-07-25. Retrieved 2010-05-23.
- National Women's Health Network | A Voice For Women, A Network For Change
- Alesha Doan (2007). Opposition and Intimidation: The Abortion Wars and Strategies of Political Harassment. University of Michigan Press. p. 59. ISBN 9780472069750.
- "Medicine: Abortion on Request". Time. March 9, 1970. Retrieved 2012-10-15. (subscription required)
- LeGates, Marlene. In Their Time: A History of Feminism in Western Society Routledge, 2001 ISBN 0-415-93098-7 p. 363-364
- Joffe, C (1999). "Abortion in Historical Perspective". In Maureen Paul; E. Steven Lichtenberg; Lynn Borgatta; David A. Grimes; Phillip G. Stubblefield (eds.). A clinician's guide to medical and surgical abortion. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 0-443-07529-8. OCLC 40120288. Archived from the original on 2006-09-22. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
- Gawande, Atul (2006-10-09). "The Score: How Childbirth Went Industrial". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2008-12-14.
- Gapultos, F. C. "Destructive OB Forceps". Accoucheur's Antique. Retrieved 2008-12-14.
- Baulieu, Étienne-Émile; Rosenblum, Mort (1991). The "abortion pill" : RU-486, a woman's choice. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-671-73816-X.
Lader, Lawrence (1991). RU 486 : the pill that could end the abortion wars and why American women don't have it. Reading: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-57069-6.
Villaran, Gilda (1998). "RU 486". In Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. (ed.). Marketing ethics : an international perspective. London: Thomson Learning. pp. 155–190. ISBN 1-86152-191-X.
Ulmann, André (2000). "The development of mifepristone: a pharmaceutical drama in three acts". Journal of the American Medical Women's Association. 55 (3 Suppl): 117–20. PMID 10846319.
- Whittaker, Andrew. "Abortion in Asia: An Overview". In Whittaker, Andrea, ed. Abortion in Asia: Local Dilemmas, Global Politics New York, NY: Berghahn Books, 2010: 11-38.
- Kligman, Gail. The Politics of Duplicity: Controlling Reproduction in Ceausescu's Romania. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998.
- Chandrasekhar, S. India's Abortion Experience Denton, TX: University of North Texas Press, 1994.
- Solinger, Rickie (1998), "Introduction", in Solinger, Rickie (ed.), Abortion Wars: A Half Century of Struggle, 1950-2000, University of California Press, pp. 1–9, ISBN 978-0520209527
- Simpson, Keith (1969), Forensic Medicine, Edward Arnold Publishers, pp. 173–174
- Jing-Bao, Nie. Behind the Silence: Chinese Voices on Abortion Lanham, ML: Rowman & Litterfield Publishers, 2005.
- Norgren, Tiana. Abortion before Birth Control: The Politics of Reproduction in Postwar Japan Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.
- Kligman, Gail. "Political Demography: The Banning of Abortion in Ceausescu's Romania". In Ginsburg, Faye D.; Rapp, Rayna, eds. Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1995 :234-255. Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE KIE/49442.
- Critchlow, Donald T. (1999). Intended consequences: birth control, abortion, and the federal government in modern America. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-504657-9. OCLC 38542669.
- Critchlow, Donald T. (1996). The politics of abortion and birth control in historical perspective. University Park, Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press. ISBN 0-271-01570-5. OCLC 33132898.
- Garrow, David J. (1994). Liberty and sexuality: the right to privacy and the making of Roe v. Wade. New York City: Macmillan Publishers. ISBN 0-02-542755-5. OCLC 246873646.
- Hartmann, Betsy (1995). Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control. South End Press. ISBN 978-0896084919.
- Hull, N. E. H.; Peter Charles Hoffer (2001). Roe v. Wade: the abortion rights controversy in American history. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 0-7006-1142-8. OCLC 231958828.
- Mohr, James C. (1978). Abortion in America: the origins and evolution of national policy, 1800–1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-502249-1. OCLC 3016879.
- Olasky, Marvin (1992). Abortion Rites: A Social History of Abortion in America. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway Books. ISBN 0-89107-687-5.
- Staggenborg, Suzanne (1991). The pro-choice movement: organization and activism in the abortion conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-506596-4. OCLC 22809649.
- Rubin, Eva R. (1994). The Abortion controversy: a documentary history. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-313-28476-8. OCLC 28213877.
- Wiesner-Hanks, Merry E. (1999). Christianity and Sexuality in the Early Modern World Regulating Desire, Reforming Practice. Hoboken: Routledge. ISBN 9780203979419.