Jump to content

History of the Tlingit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Black-and-white photograph of multiple Tlingit paddlers seated in long wooden canoes on a lake in Alaska, 1887.
Tlingit canoes in Alaska, 1887

The history of the Tlingit includes pre- and post-contact events and stories. Tradition-based history includes creation stories, the Raven Cycle, migration stories of arrival in Lingít Aaní, and individual clan histories. Tlingit historical knowledge is preserved through oral tradition, clan property, place names, ceremonial practice and later written records. More recent accounts describe events near the time of the first contact with Europeans. European and American historical records come into play at that point; modern Tlingit also maintain their own records of ancestors and events important to them against the background of a changing world.[1]

Raven Tales

[edit]

Raven Tales are a major part of Tlingit oral tradition. Although the tales are associated with the Raven moiety, many are shared by any Tlingit regardless of clan affiliation and make up some of the stories told to children. Raven Cycle stories are often shared anecdotally, the telling of one inspiring the telling of another. Many are humorous; some are serious, imparting Tlingit morality and ethics, and others belong to specific clans and may only be shared with permission.[1] Some of the most popular are Pacific Northwest tribal creation myths.

The Raven Cycle stories often present Raven in different roles, although most storytellers do not clearly distinguish them. One role is the creator, Raven, who is sometimes identical to the Owner of Daylight. Another is the childish Raven: selfish, sly, conniving, and hungry. Comparing several stories reveals logical inconsistencies between the two, which is usually explained by their setting in a mythical place and time in which the rules of the modern world did not apply.

The Box of Daylight

[edit]

The most familiar story is The Box of Daylight, in which Raven steals the stars, the moon, and the sun from Naas-sháki Yéil (or Naas-sháki Shaan, the old man of the raven tribe at the head of the Nass River). The old man is wealthy, and owns three boxes which contain the stars, the moon, and the sun. Raven wants them for a variety of reasons (such as wanting to admire himself in the light or wanting light to find food easily), transforms himself into a hemlock needle and drops into the water cup belonging to the old man's daughter while she picks berries. She becomes pregnant with him, and gives birth; the old man dotes on his grandson. Raven cries constantly, until the old man gives him the box of stars to pacify him. Raven, playing with it, opens the lid; the stars escape through the chimney into the sky. He later begins crying for the box of the moon, and the old man gives it to him after blocking the chimney. Raven plays with it, rolls it out the door and it escapes into the sky. Raven finally begins crying for the box of the sun, and the old man gives it to him. Knowing that he cannot roll it out the door or toss it up the chimney (because he is being watched), he waits until everyone is asleep, changes into his bird form, grasps the sun in his beak and flies out the chimney. Raven shows the others his sun; when he opens the box the sun flies up into the sky, where it has been ever since.[2]

Tlingit migration

[edit]

The Tlingit tell a story, with slight variations, of how they came to their lands. The story varies primarily in location, with some versions referring to specific rivers and glaciers; one describes the relationship with their inland Athabaskan-speaking neighbors.

Stories are considered property in Tlingit culture, and sharing a story without its owners' permission is a breach of Tlingit law. Songs, stories, designs, personal names and land may belong to particular clans or houses.[1] Stories about the Tlingit people as a whole, the creation myths and other universal records, however, are usually considered the property of the tribe and may be shared without restriction. It is important that the details be correct, to preserve the story's accuracy.

One version begins with the Athabaskan (Ghunanaa) people of interior Alaska and western Canada: a land of lakes and rivers, of birch and spruce forests, moose and caribou. Life in its continental climate was harsh, with bitterly cold winters and hot summers. One year the people had a poor harvest, and it was obvious that the winter would bring many deaths from starvation. The elders gathered and decided that a group of explorers would be sent to find a land rumored to be rich in food, a place where one did not have to hunt.

Over the winter, many people died. The next summer's harvest was poor, again threatening the people, and the elders again decided to send explorers to find the land of abundance. This group traveled a long distance, climbing mountain passes to find a huge glacier. The glacier seemed impassable, and the mountains around it were much too steep for the people to cross. They could, however, see how the glacial meltwater flowed down into deep crevasses and disappeared under its icy bulk. The people decided that strong, young men should be sent to follow the river and see if it emerged on the other side of the mountains. Before the men left, however, an elderly couple volunteered to make the trip; the loss of strong young men would be devastating, they reasoned, but the couple were near the end of their lives. The people agreed that the elders should travel under the glacier. They made a simple dugout canoe, took it downriver under the glacier, and came out to see a rocky plain with deep forests and rich beaches. The people followed them under the glacier and came to Lingít Aaní: the rich, bountiful land which became the Tlingit home. These people were the first Tlingit.

Another theory of Tlingit migration is that they crossed the Beringia land bridge. Tlingit trade networks connected coastal communities with inland Athabaskan-speaking peoples, and Tlingit traders acted as middlemen who brought coastal and later Russian goods inland over routes such as the Chilkoot Trail to the Yukon and northern British Columbia.[3]

Early occupation and economy

[edit]

Archaeological and oral historical evidence indicate a long Tlingit presence in Southeast Alaska. The National Park Service has reported archaeological sites in Sitka National Historical Park associated with occupation by prehistoric Native Americans and their descendants, including the Sitka Tlingit and Kiks.ádi, from about 2,600 years ago to the modern period. Kiks.ádi oral histories also connect the clan to Sitka from the time of an eruption of Mount Edgecumbe.[4]

Tlingit life depended on maritime and riverine resources, including salmon, halibut, herring, cod, sea mammals, land mammals and berries. Tlingit people used large cedar canoes, fish traps and drying techniques, and clan groups maintained rights to particular fishing places. Coastal products were traded inland for goods such as caribou skins, fox furs, jade and copper.[3]

Clan histories

[edit]

The main Tlingit moieties are yeil (raven), gooch (wolf) and ch'aak (eagle). Eagle and wolf are the same moiety. All clans fall under one of the moieties.[5] Each clan has its own foundation history, which belongs to the clan and may not be shared. Each story describes the Tlingit world from a different perspective and, taken together, narrates much Tlingit history before the coming of the dléit khaa (white people).

A typical clan history involves an extraordinary event that brought a family (or group of families) together, separating them from other Tlingit. Some clans seem to be older than others, and their histories have mythic proportions. Younger clans generally have histories describing a separation from other groups due to internal conflict or the desire for new territory. Although the Deisheetaan clan descends from the Ghaanaxh.ádi, its foundation story tells little to nothing about that relationship. However, the Khák'w.wedí (who are descended from the Deisheetaan) usually mention their connection in their foundation story. Their separation was more recent (and well-remembered) than that of the Deisheetaan from the Ghaanaxh.ádi.

European contact

[edit]

A number of well-known and obscure Europeans explored Lingít Aaní and encountered the Tlingit. Many early exchanges involved trade, and the Tlingit quickly appreciated the trading potential of valuable European goods and resources, exploiting it in their early contacts.

Early European explorers commented on Tlingit wealth and on the difference between summer camps and winter villages. Expeditions were:

Fur-trade era

[edit]

Russian settlement in Tlingit lands (1790s onwards) involved both peaceful trade and periodic violent clashes - notably the Battle of Sitka in 1804, the culmination of the Russian-Tlingit War [ru] of 1802-1805.

Russian traders arrived at Sitka in 1799 and established Redoubt Saint Michael. Relations with the Kiks.ádi deteriorated, and in 1802 Tlingit forces destroyed the Russian post. Before the Russian return in 1804, Tlingit leaders built the fort Shís'gi Noow near the Indian River and selected K'alyáan as war chief. Russian forces under Alexander Baranov attacked in 1804. After an initial Tlingit defense and the loss of a gunpowder reserve, the Kiks.ádi withdrew in what is now called the Survival March. The Russians then occupied the abandoned site and established New Archangel.[4] Tlingit resistance and negotiation continued after the battle, and the Kiks.ádi returned to Sitka in 1822.[4]

Chilkat Tlingit warriors attacked and burned Fort Selkirk, the Hudson's Bay Company post at the juncture of the Yukon and Pelly Rivers, in 1852. The Chilkat had been middlemen between the company and the Athapaskan people of the interior (on preexisting trade routes), and were unwilling to be excluded from the arrangement.

In 1855, an alliance of Tongass Tlingit (Stikines) and Haida raided Puget Sound on an enslavement expedition. Confronted at Port Gamble, Washington Territory by the USS Massachusetts and other naval vessels, the raiders suffered casualties, included a Haida chief. A return expedition by the alliance the following year was punitive, with Isaac N. Ebey chosen at random as a high-ranking white man whose death would avenge the chief's death the previous year. Although the territorial government pressed the colonial government of Vancouver Island to apprehend Ebey's killer, the colonial authorities lacked a sufficient military capability to mount an expedition capable of defeating the Haida-Tlingit alliance, and Ebey's killer was never identified or captured.[citation needed]

Slavery existed in Tlingit, Haida and Tsimshian societies and remained a part of Southeast Alaska history into the nineteenth century. The subject remains sensitive in contemporary communities and has been studied in relation to cases such as Sah Quah, a Haida man enslaved in Sitka who sought freedom in federal court in 1886.[6]

American military rule

[edit]

In March 1867, the United States purchased Alaska from Russia. The formal transfer of the Russian colony to the U.S. took place in October in Sitka. Called the Department of Alaska, the territory was assigned to the Army for occupation and government. Military rule by the Army and Navy, which lasted until 1884, was characterized by inconsistency, violence, and legal ambiguity. Historian Bobby Lain described Alaska at this time as "an insular colony, acquired before the United States was ready for overseas colonies."[7]

The Tlingit were heavily impacted by American military rule. During the February 1869 Kake War, the USS Saginaw destroyed three deserted villages and two forts near present-day Kake. Before the conflict, two white trappers were killed by the Kake people in retribution for the death of two Kake who were leaving the village of Sitka by canoe. Sitka was the site of a standoff between the army and the Tlingit due to the army's demand for the surrender of a chief, the Chilkat Colchika from Haines, who was involved in an altercation at Fort Sitka. Although no Kake (or possibly one old woman) died in the destruction of the villages, the loss of winter stores, canoes and shelter led to Kake deaths during the winter. The Kake did not rebuild the small villages; some moved to other villages, and others remained near Kake.[8] In 2024, the United States Navy apologized for the destruction of Kake.[9]

The December 1869 Wrangell Bombardment began after Lowan, a Stikine, bit off the finger of a white woman; Lowan and another Stikine were then killed by soldiers. Lowan's father, Scutd-doo, entered the fort the following morning and fatally shot trading-post operator Leon Smith. The army demanded Scutd-doo's surrender and, after a bombardment, the villagers handed Scutd-doo over to the military. He was court-martialed and hanged before the garrison and villagers on 29 December;[10][11] before his death, Scutd-doo said that he had avenged Lowan's death and did not target Smith.[10][11]

The October 1882 Angoon Bombardment was the destruction of the Tlingit village of Angoon by U.S. naval forces commanded by Edgar C. Merriman and the USRC Thomas Corwin under the command of Michael A. Healy. The Tlingit villagers had taken white hostages and property and demanded two hundred blankets in compensation from the North West Trading Company after the accidental death of a Tlingit shaman who died in a harpoon-cannon accident while working on a whaling ship. Although the hostages were released when the naval expedition arrived in Angoon, Merriman demanded four hundred blankets in tribute; when the Tlingit delivered only eighty-one blankets, his forces destroyed the village.[12]Governor of Alaska Jay Hammond commemorated the 100th anniversary of the bombardment as Tlingit Remembrance Day.[13] In 2024, the United States Navy formally apologized for the destruction of Angoon.[14]

The American administration had recruited Tlingit to police the indigenous population by the 1880s, particularly in Sitka. Although some prominent Tlingit (such as Anaxóots) became police officers, their legal authority sometimes clashed with Tlingit norms of inter-clan conflict resolution.

Early fishing industry

[edit]

The first American industrial fish canneries were established in Tlingit territory in 1878 in Klawock (Lawáak) and Sitka. Some Tlingit sold fish to the canneries or worked processing fish. That summer, Tlingit led by Anaxóots of the Kaagwaantaan protested the arrival of eighteen Chinese workers in Sitka and demanded that they not take their jobs. The American managers reportedly resolved the conflict with promises that the Chinese would only use skills in the cannery which the Tlingit had not been taught; if the Tlingit learned those skills, they would replace the Chinese.[15]

Alaska Native Brotherhood and recognition

[edit]

The Alaska Native Brotherhood was founded in Sitka in 1912 to address Indigenous rights in Alaska; the Alaska Native Sisterhood followed. The ANB and ANS are nonprofit organizations which assist in societal development, preservation of native culture, and equality.[16] In 1929, the ANB passed a resolution to sue the United States over the creation of Tongass National Forest and Glacier Bay National Park without the permission of Southeast Alaska Indigenous peoples. After being advised that only federally recognized tribes could sue over aboriginal land claims, Tlingit and Haida leaders petitioned Congress for recognition.[16]

Congress recognized the Tlingit and Haida people as a single tribe in 1935, and a suit was filed on their behalf in 1947. In 1959, the Court of Claims held that Tlingit and Haida people had original use, occupancy and dominion from time immemorial over claimed lands and waters in Southeast Alaska. In 1968, the Court of Claims awarded $7.5 million for lands withdrawn to create Tongass National Forest and Glacier Bay National Monument.[16]

Elizabeth Peratrovich was an ANS member for whom Alaska designated a state holiday (February 16) in 1988. The Alaska Equal Rights Act of 1945, the first anti-discrimination law in Alaskan history, was initially proposed by the Alaska Native Brotherhood and Alaska Native Sisterhood and was championed by Roy and Elizabeth Peratrovich.[17] Peratrovich's brother-in-law, Frank (president of the Native Brotherhood), was of Tlingit and Serbian descent. St. Nicholas Russian Orthodox Church in Juneau was built by a group of Orthodox Tlingit and Serbs.[18]

World War II

[edit]

During World War II, Tlingit individuals served as code talkers, using the spoken Tlingit language to transmit military messages. Their contributions remained little known for decades, and Tlingit code talkers were later recognized under the broader Code Talkers Recognition Act of 2008.[19] Five deceased Tlingit code talkers were recognized by the Alaska Legislature in 2019 and by the Alaska Native Brotherhood in 2021.[20][21]

Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and present day

[edit]

The Tlingit were a driving force behind the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), which was signed by President Richard Nixon on December 18, 1971. ANCSA was enacted to settle aboriginal land title claims with Alaska Natives and provided for the selection and conveyance of federal lands to regional and village Native corporations.[22] Sealaska Corporation was established after ANCSA as the regional Alaska Native corporation for Southeast Alaska and represents Tlingit, Haida and Tsimshian shareholders.[23]

In 1993, the Department of the Interior omitted the Central Council of the Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska from the list of federally recognized tribes. Tlingit and Haida petitioned Congress, and in 1994 federal legislation restored the tribe to the list of federally recognized tribes.[16]

Some interior Tlingit live in Atlin, British Columbia, and the Yukon communities of Whitehorse, Carcross and Teslin. Coastal Tlingit also live in Alaska. Every two years, the inland and coastal Tlingit celebrate their culture; Juneau hosts the celebration in even-numbered years, and Teslin is the host in odd-numbered years. Events include traditional performances, cultural demonstrations, nightly feasts held by the three inland Tlingit communities, hand-game tournaments, canoeing events, children's activities, an artists' market and food vendors.[citation needed]

Language revitalization has become an important part of contemporary Tlingit history. Sealaska Heritage Institute has described Tlingit, Haida and Tsimshian languages as having been nearly lost during a period of severe cultural oppression, while younger learners now study and teach with fluent Elders through language programs and publications.[24]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Dauenhauer, Nora Marks; Dauenhauer, Richard (1984). "Alaska Native Oral Tradition". Smithsonian Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  2. ^ Dauenhauer, Nora Marks; Dauenhauer, Richard (1987). Haa Shuká, Our Ancestors: Tlingit Oral Narratives. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 9780295964959.
  3. ^ a b "The Tlingit". National Park Service. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  4. ^ a b c "Battle of 1804". National Park Service. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  5. ^ "Tlingit Social Structure" (PDF). Sealaska Heritage Institute. Retrieved 2 December 2023.
  6. ^ "SHI publishes about Alaskan slavery". Sealaska Heritage Institute. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  7. ^ Lain, Bobby Dave (1974). North of Fifty-Three: Army, Treasury Department, and Navy Administration of Alaska, 1867–1884 (PhD dissertation). University of Texas at Austin. p. iii.
  8. ^ Harring, Sidney L. (1989). "The Incorporation of Alaskan Natives Under American Law: United States and Tlingit Sovereignty, 1867-1900". Arizona Law Review. 31: 279. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  9. ^ "US Navy to apologize for razing of Native Alaska community in late 1800s". The Guardian. 21 September 2024. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  10. ^ a b Jones, Zachary R. (2015). The 1869 Bombardment of Ḵaachx̱an.áakʼw from Fort Wrangell: U.S. Army Response to Tlingit Law, Wrangell, Alaska (Report). National Park Service, American Battlefield Protection Program; Sealaska Heritage Institute. Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  11. ^ a b Secretary of War (21 March 1870). Report of the commander of the department of Alaska upon the late bombardment of the Indian village at Wrangel, in that Territory, to Congress (Report). United States Congress. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  12. ^ Harring, Sidney L. (1994). Crow Dog's Case: American Indian Sovereignty, Tribal Law, and United States Law in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 228–230. ISBN 9780521467155.
  13. ^ Williams, Maria Sháa Tláa, ed. (2009). The Alaska Native Reader: History, Culture, Politics. Durham: Duke University Press. pp. 144–150. ISBN 9780822344803.
  14. ^ "U.S. Navy apologizes for 1882 obliteration of Tlingit village in Alaska". Associated Press. 26 October 2024. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  15. ^ Price, Robert E. (1990). The Great Father in Alaska: The Case of the Tlingit and Haida Salmon Fishery. Douglas, Alaska: First Street Press. pp. 49–51.
  16. ^ a b c d "Our History". Central Council of the Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  17. ^ "Elizabeth Peratrovich and Alaska's Anti-Discrimination Act of 1945". Alaska State Archives. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  18. ^ "The History of the St Nicholas Church". St. Nicholas Russian Orthodox Church. Orthodox Church in America. Archived from the original on 24 July 2019. Retrieved 10 June 2017.
  19. ^ "Code Talkers Recognition Congressional Medals Program". United States Mint. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  20. ^ "Service of the Tlingit Code Talkers". The American Legion Centennial Celebration. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  21. ^ "ANB Resolution # 21-01: Recognition of Tlingit Code Talkers in World War II". The American Legion Centennial Celebration. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  22. ^ "Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act". Bureau of Land Management. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  23. ^ "History". Sealaska. Retrieved 29 April 2026.
  24. ^ "Language Department". Sealaska Heritage Institute. Retrieved 29 April 2026.


Further reading

[edit]
  • Dauenhauer, Nora Marks; Dauenhauer, Richard (1987). Haa Shuká, Our Ancestors: Tlingit Oral Narratives. Classics of Tlingit Oral Literature. Seattle: University of Washington Press; Sealaska Heritage Foundation. ISBN 9780295964959.
  • Dauenhauer, Nora Marks; Dauenhauer, Richard; Black, Lydia T., eds. (2008). Anóoshi Lingít Aaní Ká / Russians in Tlingit America: The Battles of Sitka, 1802 and 1804. Classics of Tlingit Oral Literature. Seattle: University of Washington Press; Sealaska Heritage Institute. ISBN 9780295986012.
  • De Laguna, Frederica (1972). Under Mount Saint Elias: The History and Culture of the Yakutat Tlingit. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology. Vol. 7. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  • Emmons, George Thornton (1991). De Laguna, Frederica (ed.). The Tlingit Indians. With Jean Low. Seattle: University of Washington Press; American Museum of Natural History. ISBN 9780295970080.
  • Grinev, Andrei Val'terovich (2005). The Tlingit Indians in Russian America, 1741–1867. Translated by Bland, Richard L.; Solovjova, Katerina G. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 0-8032-0538-4.