The effect is achieved by zooming a zoom lens to adjust the angle of view (often referred to as field of view, or FOV) while the camera dollies (moves) toward or away from the subject in such a way as to keep the subject the same size in the frame throughout. In its classic form, the camera angle is pulled away from a subject while the lens zooms in, or vice versa. Thus, during the zoom, there is a continuous perspective distortion, the most directly noticeable feature being that the background appears to change size relative to the subject.
The visual appearance for the viewer is that either the background suddenly grows in size and detail and overwhelms the foreground, or the foreground becomes immense and dominates its previous setting, depending on which way the dolly zoom is executed. As the human visual system uses both size and perspective cues to judge the relative sizes of objects, seeing a perspective change without a size change is a highly unsettling effect, often with strong emotional impact.
A dolly counter zoom is also variously known as:
- Focus disturbance zoom
- A "zido"
- A "zolly"
- Hunter Smith Shot
- "Hitchcock shot" or "Hunter shot"
- The "Hitchcock zoom" or the "Vertigo effect"
- Vertigo zoom
- A "Jaws shot"
- Reverse Tracking Shot
- Triple Reverse Zoom
- Back Zoom Travelling
- "Smash Zoom" or "Smash Shot"
- Trombone shot
- The Long Pull
- Reverse Pull
- The Trombone Effect
- A Stretch shot
- More technically as forward zoom / reverse tracking or zoom in / dolly out
- Trans-trav (in Romanian and Russian), from trans-focal length operation and travelling movement
Purpose of the effect
The dolly zoom is commonly used by filmmakers to represent the sensation of vertigo, a "falling-away-from-oneself feeling" or a feeling of unreality, or to suggest that a character is undergoing a realization that causes him or her to reassess everything he or she had previously believed. After Hitchcock popularized the effect, he used it again for a climactic revelation in Marnie.
For most purposes, it can be assumed that the image space and the object space are in the same medium. Thus, for an object in focus, the distance between the lens and image plane , the distance between lens and the object , and the focal length are related by
Then the transverse magnification is
The axial magnification of an object at is the rate of change of the lens–image distance as the lens–object distance changes. For an object of finite depth, one can conceive of the average axial magnification as the ratio of the depth of the image and the depth of the object:
One can see that if magnification remains constant, a longer focal length results in a smaller axial magnification, and a smaller focal length in a larger axial magnification. That is, when using a longer focal length while moving the camera/lens away from the object to maintain the same magnification M, objects seem shallower, and the axial distances between objects seem shorter. The opposite—increased axial magnification—happens with shorter focal lengths while moving the camera/lens towards the object.
To achieve the effect, the camera needs to be positioned at a certain distance from the object that is supposed to remain still during the dolly zoom. The distance depends on how wide the scene is to be filmed and on the field of view (FOV) of the camera lens. Before calculating the distances needed at the different fields of view, the constant width of the scene has to be calculated:
For example, a FOV of 90° and a distance of 2 meters yield a constant width of 4 meters, allowing a 4-meter-wide object to remain still inside the frame during the effect.
- Lyttelton, Oliver; Lyttelton, Oliver (2012-05-09). "5 Things You Might Not Know About Alfred Hitchcock's Masterpiece 'Vertigo'". IndieWire. Retrieved 2017-02-01.
- Wickman, Forrest (January 21, 2014). ""The Evolution of the Dolly Zoom," in One Supercut". Slate.
- Norman Holland. "Hitchcock's Vertigo: One Viewer's Viewing".
- "The "Vertigo shot" and the oneiric frame". Archived from the original on 2007-09-15.