|This article does not cite any sources. (September 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Early FORTRAN had no
CHARACTER data type, only numeric types. In order to perform character manipulation, characters needed to be placed into numeric variables using Hollerith constants. For example, the constant
3HABC specified a three-character string "ABC". These constants were typeless, so that there were no type conversion issues. If the constant specified fewer characters than was possible to hold in a data item, the characters were then stored in the item left-justified and blank-filled.
By the FORTRAN 66 Standard, Hollerith syntax was allowed in the following uses:
- As constants in
- As constant actual arguments in subroutine
- As edit descriptors in
Portability was problematic with Hollerith Constants. First, word sizes varied on different computer systems, so the number of characters that could be placed in each data item likewise varied. Implementations varied from as few as two to as many as ten characters per word. Second, it was difficult to manipulate individual characters within a word in a portable fashion. This led to a great deal of shifting and masking code using non-standard, vendor-specific, features. The fact that character sets varied between machines also complicated the issue.
Some authors were of the opinion that for best portability, only a single character should be used per data item. However considering the small memory sizes of machines of the day, this technique was considered extremely wasteful.
One of the major features of FORTRAN 77 was the
CHARACTER string data type. Use of this data type dramatically simplified character manipulation in Fortran programs – rendering almost all uses of the Hollerith constant technique obsolete.
Hollerith constants were removed from the FORTRAN 77 Standard, though still described in an appendix for those wishing to continue support. Hollerith edit descriptors were allowed through Fortran 90, and were removed from the Fortran 95 Standard.
The following is a FORTRAN 66 hello world program using Hollerith constants. It assumes that at least four characters per word are supported by the implementation:
PROGRAM HELLO1 C INTEGER IHWSTR(3) DATA IHWSTR/4HHELL,4HO WO,3HRLD/ C WRITE (6,100) IHWSTR STOP 100 FORMAT (3A4) END
DATA statements, Hollerith constants were also allowed as actual arguments in subroutine calls. However there was no way that the callee could know how many characters were passed in. The programmer had to pass the information explicitly. The hello world program could be written as follows – on a machine where four characters are stored in a word:
PROGRAM HELLO2 CALL WRTOUT (11HHELLO WORLD, 11) STOP END C SUBROUTINE WRTOUT (IARRAY, NCHRS) C INTEGER IARRAY(1)[notes 1] INTEGER NCHRS C INTEGER ICPW DATA ICPW/4/[notes 2] INTEGER I, NWRDS C NWRDS = (NCHRS + ICPW - 1) /ICPW WRITE (6,100) (IARRAY(I), I=1,NWRDS) RETURN 100 FORMAT (100A4)[notes 3] END
Although technically not a Hollerith constant, the same Hollerith syntax was allowed as an edit descriptor in
FORMAT statements. The hello world program could also be written as:
PROGRAM HELLO3 WRITE (6,100) STOP 100 FORMAT (11HHELLO WORLD) END
One of the most surprising features was the behaviour of Hollerith edit descriptors when used for input. The following program would change at run time
HELLO WORLD to whatever would happen to be the next eleven characters in the input stream and print that input:
PROGRAM WHAT1 READ (5,100) WRITE (6,100) STOP 100 FORMAT (11HHELLO WORLD) END
- FORTRAN 66 did not have a way to indicate a variable-sized array. So a '1' was typically used to indicate that the size is unknown.
- Four characters per word.
- A count of 100 is a 'large enough' value that any reasonable number of characters can be written. Also note that four characters per word is hard-coded here too.