The Holman Rule is a rule in the United States House of Representatives that allows amendments to appropriations legislation that would reduce the salary of or fire specific federal employees, or cut a specific program. The rule was first enacted in 1876 and rescinded in 1983, and was reinstated in January 2017 on a temporary basis.
The rule is an exception to the prohibition against provisions in appropriations legislation that change existing law. Prior to the rule's reinstatement in 2017, cuts could be made to agencies broadly, but not to specific programs or employees.
The rule was used to eliminate 29 customs positions in 1932 and another eight in 1939, to allow a provision reducing the number of naval officers in 1938, and to allow a 1952 amendment disallowing the filling of vacancies in independent agencies until the agency's workforce had been reduced by 10%. It appears never to have been used to cut a specific worker's salary with the intent of incentivizing them to quit. The rule cannot be used if the reductions are contingent on other events, or to give broad authority to agency heads to fire workers.
The constitutionality of bills passed under the Holman Rule has been questioned by legal scholars in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in United States v. Lovett (1946). That case dealt with an act of Congress, passed during the Red Scare, that defunded the salaries of 39 employees accused of having Communist sympathies. The Court held that, under these circumstances, the Act was no "mere appropriation measure", but was effectively a bill of attainder prohibited by Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution.
Prior to 1983, the Holman Rule was part of Rule XXI, Clause 2 of the Rules of the House of Representatives, and stated that an amendment to an appropriations bill is allowed if it, "being germane to the subject matter of the bill, shall retrench expenditures by the reduction of the number and salary of the officers of the United States, by the reduction of the compensation of any person paid out of the Treasury of the United States, or by the reduction of amounts of money covered by the bill".
The 2017 reinstatement of the law was a standing order not incorporated into the main body of the Rules of the House. It allows during the 115th Congress, "any provision or amendment ... that retrenches expenditures by—(1) the reduction of amounts of money in the bill; (2) the reduction of the number and salary of the officers of the United States; or (3) the reduction of the compensation of any person paid out of the Treasury of the United States."
The rule was first passed in 1876, rescinded in 1895, and restored in 1911. It underwent several modifications until it reached its final state in 1911. It was named for Indiana Representative William S. Holman. It was initially used to eliminate patronage positions prior to the establishment of the merit-based employment system. It was also used for targeted cuts to, and caps on, the number and salary of federal employees, though its use was rare in modern times. It was removed in 1983 due to objections from Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill.
The rule was reinstated as part of the rules package enacted at the beginning of the 115th Congress in 2017 for a period of one year, unless extended by Congress. It was championed by Freedom Caucus member Morgan Griffith, Republican of Virginia, who favored empowering individual members of Congress to strategically reassign workers according to policy needs, and to cut programs perceived as wasteful. Republicans said that the rule change would increase accountability and streamline the appropriations process, and said they did not intend it as a broad change to the appropriations process.
Democrats criticized the revival of the Holman Rule as undermining civil service protections, and allowing the possibility that specific individuals could be targeted for political reasons. Federal employee unions, such as the American Federation of Government Employees, raised similar concerns. The rule was also criticized for taking hiring decisions out of the hands of Cabinet and other members of the executive branch. Some Republicans also criticized the rule, such as Tom Cole, chairman of a House Appropriations Subcommittee.
There were several attempts to use the rule in 2017 as amendments to the fiscal year 2018 appropriations bills. A proposal offered by Morgan Griffith to eliminate 89 jobs at the Congressional Budget Office failed on July 26, 2017, on a vote of 116–309. There were also two additional amendments offered by Ron DeSantis that were approved by the House Rules Committee but did not receive a floor vote: one aimed at employees working on Guantanamo Bay Naval Base policy, as well as one for a single individual at the Army Corps of Engineers.
The Holman Rule was extended to the end of the 115th Congress in March 2018. In April 2018, the Republican Study Committee budget plan supported use of the rule to remove positions considered unneeded. In June 2018, Paul Gosar proposed using the rule to cut the Western Area Power Administration Administrator Mark Gabriel's salary to $1 for alleged misconduct. This amendment failed by a vote of 139–276 on June 7, 2018.
- Saturno, James V. (January 13, 2017). The Holman Rule (House Rule XXI, Clause 2(b)) (PDF). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
- "Chapter 26(4): The Holman Rule". Deschler's Precedents (PDF). vol. 8. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1994. pp. 5317–5334.
- "Chapter 26(5): Provisions Not Within The Holman Rule". Deschler's Precedents (PDF). vol. 8. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1994. pp. 5334–5359.
- Portnoy, Jenna; Rein, Lisa (January 5, 2017). "House Republicans Revive Obscure Rule that Allows Them to Slash the Pay of Individual Federal Workers to $1". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 14, 2017.
- Mazmanian, Adam (January 10, 2017). "Is Congress Really Going to Cut Your Pay to $1?". Federal Computer Week. Retrieved January 14, 2017.
- Williams, Patricia J. (January 19, 2017). "The Holman Rule Once Allowed Congress to Purge Leftists From Government Agencies—Now It's Back". The Nation.
- Hills, Rick (January 7, 2017). "Does the Holman Rule Authorize Unconstitutional Bills of Attainder?". PrawfsBlawg.
- "H.Res. 5, Adopting the Rules of the 115th Congress: Section-by-Section Analysis" (PDF). U.S. House Committee on Rules. 2017. p. 5. Retrieved January 23, 2017.
- "Text of H. Res. 5—Adopting rules for the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress". U.S. House Committee on Rules. January 3, 2017. Retrieved January 23, 2017.
- Fisher, Louis (1979). "The Authorization-Appropriation Process in Congress: Formal Rules and Informal Practices". Catholic University Law Review. 29 (1): 51–105.
- Kirkland, Allegra (January 6, 2017). "Fed Employees Wary Of New Rule Allowing Congress To Cut Their Salaries At Will". Talking Points Memo. Retrieved January 14, 2017.
- Cordell, Carten (January 5, 2017). "Federal Employee Unions Wary of Holman Rule Reemergence". Federal Times.
- Mejdrich, Kellie; Mejdrich, Kellie (2018-03-20). "House GOP Renews 'Holman Rule' Targeting Federal Pay". Roll Call. Retrieved 2018-10-01.
- Katz, Eric (2017-07-27). "Republicans Take First Shots at Slashing Individual Federal Employees' Salaries". Government Executive. Retrieved 2018-10-01.
- Ogrysko, Nicole (2017-07-25). "Republicans use Holman Rule to propose 89 personnel cuts at CBO". Federal News Radio. Retrieved 2018-10-01.
- Ogrysko, Nicole (2018-03-20). "House Republicans just brought back the Holman Rule for another year". Federal News Radio. Retrieved 2018-10-01.
- Wagner, Erich (2018-04-26). "House GOP Group Envisions Massive Changes to Civil Service in Budget Proposal". Government Executive. Retrieved 2018-10-01.
- Wagner, Dennis (2018-06-06). "Rep. Gosar seeks to cut top federal power agency boss' salary to $1 per year". AZ Central. Retrieved 2018-10-01.
- "Final vote results for Roll Call 249". U.S. House of Representatives. 2018-06-07. Retrieved 2018-10-01.