Homaidan Al-Turki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Homaidan Ali Al-Turki (born 1969) is a Saudi national convicted in a Colorado court for sexually assaulting his Indonesian housekeeper and keeping her as a virtual slave for four years. On August 31, 2006, Al-Turki was sentenced to 28 years in prison on twelve felony counts of false imprisonment, unlawful sexual contact, theft and criminal extortion. Despite the allegations, Al-Turki has consistently denied any wrongdoing, insisting that the fraudulent charges resulted from a government conspiracy, cultural differences or "cynical Islamophobia" and rising anti-Muslim sentiment in the United States.[1] In February 25, 2011, He was re-sentenced from 28 to eight years for his good behavior in prison. Al-Turki maintains his innocence and blames anti-Muslim sentiment for the charges that led to his 2006 conviction and sentence in a case that has strained relations between the U.S. and the Saudi government.[2]


Born and raised in Saudi Arabia, Homaidan Ali Al-Turki immigrated to the United States with his family in 1995, after receiving an academic scholarship from the Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University in Riyadh to pursue a PhD in linguistics from the University of Colorado at Boulder. After successfully earning a master’s degree with honors, Al-Turki was completing a linguistics doctorate program at the University of Colorado, specializing in Arabic intonation and focus prosody. A father of five, Al-Turki and his wife Sarah Al-Khonaizan were active members of Denver's Muslim community. Additionally, Al-Turki operated Al-Basheer Publications and Translations, a well-known Arabic language translation and publishing house based in Aurora, Colorado.

Victim allegations[edit]

Legal problems for Homaidan Al-Turki and his wife began on November 18, 2004, when they were arrested with their Indonesian housekeeper by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents because of questions regarding his student visa validity. Al-Turki operated a publishing-translation business and authorities suspected it might violate student visa prohibitions of employment.[3] Accusations against the couple by their housekeeper appeared while she was in police custody. In interviews with law officers, the woman claimed she suffered four-years of captivity, exploitation and abuse at the hands of the Al-Turki family. Although authorities felt her claims were sufficient, critical inconsistencies from their investigation warrant consideration. Defense lawyers point out that the woman was interviewed 11 times by officers before making any allegations of sexual assault. Another legitimate concern was articulated by Colorado U.S. District Judge Walker Miller during Al-Turki’s bail hearing:

"The defense points to, and it's a legitimate concern, that there were many opportunities to report these things to authorities, and indeed some of the reports indicate that the victim denied any sexual involvement or assault sexually, and there's also some evidence of her trying to reach the defendant and his wife."

U.S. District Judge Walker Miller,[4] Federal Court Hearing

Despite these unresolved issues, Al-Turki and his wife were arrested by federal and state agents at their home on December 6, 2005. They were accused with forced labor, aggravated sexual abuse, document servitude, and harboring an illegal immigrant. Additionally, federal authorities told them they were subject to a "full fledge investigation" because Mr. Al-Turki is suspected of being "closely aligned to terrorists and may be providing material support to terrorism."

The U.S. Department of Labor also filed a civil suit against the Al-Turki's for illegally paying the woman below minimum wage and failing to keep employment records. They allegedly owed her roughly $62,500 in unpaid wages.[5]

Bail hearing[edit]

On July 29, 2005, Colorado U.S. District Judge Walker Miller overruled a magistrate who declared Al-Turki a flight risk, allowing release while charges against him are pending if $400,000 cash bail is posted. The entire $400,000 must be deposited to guarantee appearance at future court proceedings. Defense attorney John Richilano contacted Al-Turki's brother in Saudi Arabia with news of Miller's ruling. The brother, who is a doctor, said the family would help raise money. Defense attorney Dan Recht estimated the couple's total cost of freedom while charges are pending was $1 million, including: Al-Turki's $400,000 bail in Arapahoe County District Court, provided by the Saudi government: $400,000 in federal court: $25,000 to $50,000 bond to immigration court: and his wife's $150,000 bail. An FBI agent working the case testified that Al-Turki borrowed over $200,000 for his business from three friends who attended his mosque but had repaid only about $53,000 of it. Miller further ordered that Al-Turki be placed on electronic monitoring, avoid all potential witnesses in the case except his wife, remain in Colorado and not seek deportation through the U.S. immigration agency.[3]

District Court trial[edit]

Arapahoe County District Court initiated criminal trial proceedings against Homaidan Al-Turki and Sarah Khonaizan on February 16, 2006, with the defendants both entering not-guilty plees. Prosecutor Ann Tomsic began the state’s case by explaining how the couple brought the young Indonesian woman to the U.S. from Saudi Arabia to work as a housekeeper when she was a teenager. The affidavit states her domestic services included child care, cooking, and cleaning for 12-hours a day, seven days a week without time-off from 2000 to 2004. While not working, she was confined to an unheated basement and repeatedly sexually assaulted by Homaidan Al-Turki. Tomsic added that the woman was allowed out of the house alone only to remove trash, bring in mail and clean the yard. Prosecutors claimed the couple intentionally created a climate of fear and intimidation through aggravated sexual abuse, which was intended to cause the victim to believe disobedience would result in serious harm. The couple also allegedly threatened the victim with abuse of law and the legal process, confiscating her Indonesian passport and visa for the purpose of obtaining labor for little or no pay.

Defense argument[edit]

Defense attorney John Richilano argued the federal government only filed fraudulent sex-slave charges after failing to make a terrorism case against Al-Turki. They claimed Mr. Al-Turki was under FBI-investigation on possible terrorism links before his arrest. Federal court documents filed by the defense show that the Denver Joint Terrorism Task Force had Al-Turki under a "full fledge investigation" suspecting "he is closely aligned to terrorists and may be providing material support to terrorism." Evidence also indicated a federal investigation of proceeds from Al-Basheer Publications. They highlighted an incident from April 2005 in Illinois, when state police stopped Al-Turki on Interstate 80 near LaSalle. A message on the national crime information computer warned the officers "terrorist organization member - caution, do not alert this individual to this notice.” His lawyers claim school documents in his car were removed, copied and faxed by the Illinois State Police to the Denver FBI. The U.S. Attorney's Office responded by maintaining that the terrorism investigation was totally unrelated to the victims allegations.[6]

Alternative theories for charges[edit]

Al-Turki’s defenders have consistently maintained the charges are politically motivated, and that the FBI has investigated him for suspected terrorism since 1995. They argued that prosecutors persuaded the housekeeper to falsely accuse Al-Turki after a failed bid to construct a terrorism case. In exchange for testifying, she received residency papers and a visa to continue working in the United States.[7] According to family interviews by Arab News, FBI agents threatened and interrogated Al-Turki numerous times following the September 11 attacks. Fahd Al-Naser, Al-Turki's nephew, indicated FBI harassment started after his 2004 arrest. He also claimed the housekeeper testified the Al-Turki family treated her respectfully during 11 separate interviews, and “only during the twelfth interview (when police were present) did she raise accusations against him.”

According to Nasar, defense attorneys learned the plaintiff had recently become a US resident after marrying an Egyptian American. Her husband contacted Al-Turki, saying his wife wished to rescind the charges. Prosecutors responded by threatening the accuser with imprisonment unless she remained silent.[8]

Despite these claims and questionable credibility,[according to whom?] prosecutor Natalie Decker insisted the evidence was overwhelming and none of it was fabricated. “This girl has been consistent through her statements once she came forward,” Decker said.

Cultural bias argument[edit]

A strategy utilized by the defense contended that Turki's Arabian cultural norms are alien to most Westerners, and hence, vulnerable to prejudice and cultural bias. For example, court documents filed by Al-Turki's lawyers illustrated that "there are Saudi Arabian customs regarding a host family's retention of funds for their domestic servant until she leaves their service."

In his testimony, Al-Turki denied any wrongdoing and said authorities had targeted him because of his religion. He insisted that the woman was treated the same way any observant Muslim family would treat their daughter and defended his actions to District Judge Justin Mark Hannen, saying that:

"The restrictions placed on her contact with non-relative males were also the same as those applicable to my daughters and other Muslim women in our community. You cannot ask somebody from a different religion to be American to the fullest. You cannot ask them to go dancing, go to the bars. We are Muslim. We are different. The state has criminalized these basic Muslim behaviors. Attacking traditional Muslim behaviors is a focal point of the prosecution."

—Homaidan Al-Turki,[9] District Court Testimony

However, Prosecution lawyer Natalie Decker adamantly contested the accuracy of this statement, stressing that the trial proceedings had nothing to do with the defendants beliefs or ethnicity and instead “has to do with what he did to her (the maid) for five years" and that Mr. Al-Turki's actions represented "a clear-cut example of human trafficking.” The prosecution also pointed out that the alleged victim, the Indonesian maid, is also a Muslim.[9] Responding to rising accusations of cultural bias, prosecution attorney Ann Tomsic requested that Judge Hannen should strive to treat Al-Turki as he would any American citizen who committed similar crimes. Tomsic further emphasized that “the world is listening, and the court needs to make a statement that in the United States, or at least in...(Colorado), this kind of slavery will not be tolerated.”[10]

Conviction and sentencing[edit]

After two and a half weeks, Homaidan Ali Al-Turki's criminal trial concluded on June 30, 2006. In the end, a jury of citizens from Arapahoe County convicted him on twelve felony counts of unlawful sexual contact with force, one felony count of theft of services over $15,000, and two misdemeanor counts of false imprisonment and conspiracy to commit false imprisonment. On August 31, 2006, he received a sentence of twenty-eight years-to-life in state prison by Judge Mark Hannen. The unusual courtroom atmospherics while the verdict was announced are worth noting. Dozens of representatives from the Metro Denver Muslim community, including Al-Turki’s friends, relatives and the Imam (prayer leader) of the state’s largest masjid, packed the courtroom. Another prominent attendee was Mohammed Jodeh, former president and chairman of the Colorado Muslim Society. Many had written to the judge expressing their support for Al-Turki. Other letters of support came from several faculty members and academic colleagues at the University of Colorado.

Nine sheriff deputies attempted to keep the peace while nearly two dozen of Al-Turki's supporters "howled at the verdict that was delivered after only one day of deliberation. One man had to be forcibly removed because of his loud sobbing. Al-Turki's supporters contended that the rape charges were primarily based on circumstantial evidence, and complained that neither DNA or material evidence were exhibited at trial. A woman collapsed at the courtroom door after seeing Al-Turki taken away in handcuffs." As for Al-Turki, "wearing a white robe, at first showed little emotion - touching his left index finger to his nose - as Judge J. Mark Hannen read the verdicts. After the jury vacated the courtroom, Al-Turki began to cry and embraced his family and friends." During that, the Indonesian woman who accused him "wept and plugged fingers into her ears to shield the sounds of wailing family and friends." As of May 29, 2009, Homaidan Al-Turki is currently incarcerated at the Limon Correctional Facility in Lincoln County, Colorado.[11]

Appeal attempts[edit]

On January 22, 2009, it was announced that the Colorado Court of Appeals upheld Homaidan Al-Turki’s conviction, ruling that the trial court correctly set certain limits during jury selection and that the jury’s findings were supported by evidence.[12]

Following the decision, family spokesman Fahd Al-Nasar, announced to the Saudi Gazette that six American law firms had been retained and they planned to appeal the verdict with the Colorado Supreme Court. Nasar added he was surprised to hear the Appeal decision only two weeks after the initial hearing, since he assumed this type of case required a minimum of at least four to six weeks. However, the Al-Turki family is optimistic about their relative's future prospects, especially with the new Obama administration in the White House promising to retain civil rights and cancel emergency laws that were enacted by the Bush administration after the September 11 attacks. They are also hopeful that diplomatic efforts from the Saudi embassy in Washington, D.C. will assist in producing a more desirable legal outcome.[13]


After reaching an agreement with prosecutors, Al-Turki's wife, Sarah Khonaizan, pleaded guilty to reduced charges in both state and federal courts. She was sentenced to home detention and probation in the federal case and two months in jail for the state case. On September 1, 2006, she was transferred to the custody of federal immigration officials and according to her attorney, Forrest Lewis, she agreed to not fight deportation proceedings.[14] Sarah arrived in Riyadh on September 22, 2006, with her two children and immediately issued a press statement, signed by Hamad Al-Khonaizan, Sarah’s brother, blaming anti-Muslim sentiment in the U.S. for Al-Turki’s prosecution. According to the statement, the primary factor behind her husband’s imprisonment was his successful efforts at preaching Islamic dawah.

After the state conviction, federal charges of forced labor, document servitude and harboring an illegal immigrant were dropped. In its motion, the U.S. Attorney’s office said that dropping the federal charges was done in hopes of sparing the victim from having to testify again about “the most intimate personal matters.”[15] Judge Walker D. Miller added the U.S. attorney's decision to drop federal charges was "in no way a statement regarding the strength of the government's case."[16]

While incarcerated, Mr. Al-Turki claims he was offered a bargain-deal by U.S. authorities which included deportation to Saudi Arabia and employment as an undercover FBI operative. In a video interview posted on YouTube, Al-Turki states he is being mistreated in prison as well as his wife, who he further contends had her hijab (head scarf) forcibly removed from her head during the trial. According to Islamic cultural norms, the removal of a woman’s head scarf is considered an extreme insult.[17]

Fact as stated to the US Supreme Court[edit]

Statement of facts from United States Supreme Court Brief, references are to volume and page numbers in the actual trial transcript:

Statement of the Case and Facts[edit]

In June 1999, Mr. Al-Turki and his wife/co-Defendant [Sarah Khonaizan] brought Z.A., a 17-year-old Muslim girl from a village in Indonesia, to Saudi Arabia to work for them as a domestic servant at a salary of 600 Saudi riyals (approximately $150) per month (Record 18:60-61, 71-75, 99-100, 102).

In September 2000, the Al-Turkis brought Z.A. to the U.S. (Record 18:124). She was admitted to stay until March 9, 2001, as a “personal or domestic employee.” The Al-Turkis kept Z.A.’s passport but failed to renew it, while repeatedly warning her that if she left them she would be arrested (Record 21:28). They also strictly controlled her communications, disallowing her to write letters to her friends (Record 21:80; 22:49; 23:28, 132-134).

Mr. Al-Turki misrepresented Z.A.’s visa status and employment situation to his friends (Record 25:88-89, 262, 307). He also falsely told his secretary at his bookstore that Z.A. was married to a driver in Saudi Arabia (Record 25:184-85). Z.A. was instructed to say that her salary was $800 per month(Record 18:122). In August 2004, she was told that if she was contacted by authorities she should tell them that she had two days off every week, and that her salary was sent to Indonesia (Record 21:73-74,99).

On November 18, 2004, following FBI investigations of Mr. Al-Turki, Z.A. was arrested for overstaying her permit. Mr. Al-Turki and his wife were also arrested for harboring an illegal alien. Initially, Z.A. told authorities what she had been instructed to say by the Al-Turkis regarding her employment situation. Eventually, however, she told the truth, including the fact that she had been paid only $1500 during her entire stay in the United States. She also revealed that Defendant had sexually abused her on a regular basis. [Based on minimum wage, the value of Z.A.’s services during the last three years of her work for the Al-Turkis was $96,044.92 (Env. #6, People’s Exh.87a 5162).]

At trial, Z.A. provided a detailed account of Mr. Al-Turki’s sexual misconduct. According to her, about once every two weeks, Mr. Al-Turki would go to her room in the basement at night and sexually molest her, including digitally penetrating her and forcing her to perform oral sex on him (Record 19:21-22, 26, 65, 97, 99, 102; 21:41). During the last incident of sexual abuse, which occurred approximately two weeks before Z.A.’s arrest, Mr. Al-Turki, for the first time, had sexual intercourse with Z.A., who was still a virgin (Record 21:44-46).

Afterwards, Z.A. confronted Mr. Al-Turki with a blood-stained tissue, expressing fear that she would become pregnant (Record 21:45). Three days later, Mr. Al-Turki told Z.A. not to worry, that he would not have sexual intercourse with her again, and that she should tell him if she missed her period (Record 21:48). Z.A. kept a diary describing Mr. Al-Turki’s sexual abuses. However, prior to Z.A.’s arrest, Mr. Al-Turki told her to destroy it, which she did (Record 21:75-76; 23:109-10).

Two married Muslim women described Mr. Al-Turki’s similar acts of sexual misconduct against them, including touching their genitalia and breasts (Record 24:160-71, 180-99).

Mr. Al-Turki’s theory of defense, which is repeated in his petition, was that Z.A., under pressure from the FBI and motivated by the desire to get authorization to stay and work in the U.S., had fabricated the allegations (Record 18:44, 50-51, 53-55; Env. #8, Instruction 32). However, Z.A., who disclosed Mr. Al-Turki’s abusive conduct to a friend of his, Mr. Al-Resheid, more than a year before any contact with authorities (Record 19:105-06) . [ Mr. Al-Resheid, a subpoenaed witness for the prosecution, left the U.S. on August 16, 2005, and never returned (Record 20:52-54).]

Z.A. never asked for assistance to stay in the U.S. (Record 25:171). Moreover, under the 2000 Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, Z.A. automatically qualified for “continued presence” status, which allowed her to stay and work in the U.S. (Record 25:119-20, 122,125-26), and the process to establish her “continued presence” status started long before she revealed the sexual abuse (Record 25:125). Finally, the FBI agent who helped Z.A. with filling out her necessary forms signed them on April 4, 2005, three days before her revelation (Record Env. #7, Deft’s Exhs. E, F; 25:172-88).

Mr. Al-Turki was convicted of false imprisonment, conspiracy to commit false imprisonment, felony unlawful sexual contact (12 counts), criminal extortion, and theft (Record 4: 872-99). He was sentenced to concurrent terms of 20years to life for the unlawful sexual contacts, an eight-year consecutive term for theft, and shorter terms on the remaining charges to run concurrently with the theft sentence (Record 4:901-02; 5:1250-55; 29:73-76; Supp. Record 31-34).

On appeal, Mr. Al-Turki challenged his convictions on various grounds. In an unpublished opinion, the Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed Mr.Al-Turki’s convictions. People v. Al-Turki, 06CA2104,January 22, 2009 (Petition, App. 1a-29a). The Colorado Supreme Court denied certiorari review. Al-Turki v. People, 2009 WL 2916999 (Colo. No. 09SC326, September 14, 2009) (Petition App. 30a-31a).

On April 5, 2010, the United States Supreme Court denied Mr. Al-Turki's Petition for Certiorari.

International reaction[edit]

The Homaidan Al-Turki case sparked controversy and high-profile attention from Muslims worldwide, particularly in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, where local media portrayed him as a victim of bias against Muslims and said he would not have been convicted of these crimes had he been tried in his native country. For example, in a show of support, the Saudi government provided Al-Turki with $400,000 to post bond. In November 2006, Colorado Attorney General John Suthers travelled to Saudi Arabia where he visited King Abdullah, Crown Prince Sultan, and Al-Turki’s family in an attempt to clear up "misperceptions" about the U.S. judicial system and ease the Saudi royal family's concerns over whether Homaidan Al-Turki was treated fairly.[18] Suthers went there at the request of the U.S. ambassador in Saudi Arabia, who had the State Department contact Colorado Governor Bill Owens. The trip was sponsored and paid for by the U.S. State Department.

Even years after the case was closed, the issue continues to arouse powerful emotions in Saudi Arabia and affect the delicate balance of Saudi-US foreign relations. Saleh Bin-Humaid, chairman of the Consultative Assembly of Saudi Arabia (Shoura Council), brought up Al-Turki’s case during an official meeting with the US Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff in Riyadh on March 26, 2009, when he urged Americans to review the topic. According to a public statement from Bin-Humaid, “The Saudi people sympathize with Homaidan Al-Turki and they closely follow up his case.”

In 2010, a campaign has been launched by the citizens of Saudi Arabia, Homaidan's friends and family, and all those who hope for his release.

Retrial on Friday 2/2/2011[edit]

Saudi PhD candidate Homaidan Al-Turki, who is jailed in the US state of Colorado, will get a retrial on Friday.

After his appeal was accepted, Al-Turki's previous 28-year sentence will be reheard at Arapahoe Court at 09:00 am Colorado local time.

Al-Turki’s defenders have provided many supportive documents to drop the charges. The lawyers have also cited Colorado prison chief's testimony of Al-Turki’s good behavior and that the chief requests the judge to commute the punishment.

Al-Turki’s medical treatments costs are rising as a result of his deteriorating health condition and it’s better to send him to his homeland, the prison chief has added.

Meanwhile, the Saudi Embassy in the USA made a formal request to release the Saudi national. Al-Turki’s case attracted much national attention since he was detained nearly 5 years ago.

Reduction of sentence[edit]

After a hearing before District Judge J. Mark Hannen in the Colorado District Court in Arapahoe County on February 25, 2011 Al-Turki's sentence was reduced to 8 years to life, making him eligible for parole soon. The Court cited his good behavior in prison. The hearing was granted due to a decision in another case which held that excessive minimum sentences had been imposed on some sex-offenders. A letter from the Saudi ambassador to the United States was considered by the court. Parole may be conditioned on Al-Turki's progress in the prison system's rehabilitation programs for sex-offenders.[19]

Denial of request to serve remainder in home country[edit]

On March 12, 2013, Al-Turki's request to be sent to his home country to serve out his sentence was denied by the Colorado Department of Corrections[20] on the grounds that state law requires sex offenders to undergo treatment while in prison and that al-Turki had declined to participate.[21] The assassination of Colorado Department of Corrections executive director Tom Clements at his residence in Monument, Colorado on March 20, 2013 prompted attention to the case of Al-Turki.[22] On March 21, 2013, the Department of Corrections announced that Homaidan al-Turki had been moved into an isolation cell for his own protection.[23] On March 22, 2013, Evan Spencer Ebel, a prison parolee, was connected as the probable suspect in Clements' shooting after he was killed in a shootout with police in Decatur, Wise County, northern Texas.[24] The Northeast Denver Islamic Center Imam Abdur-Rahim Ali objected to the media attention on Al-Turki in the ongoing investigation into Clements' murder.[25]


  1. ^ Saudi Man Gets Prison Time in Housekeeper Slavery Case in Colorado, Fox News. August 31, 2006.
  2. ^ "Saudi linguist gets reduced sentence in sex slave case". KDVR (CENTENNIAL, Colo.). February 25, 2011. Archived from the original on October 6, 2011. Retrieved 10 May 2013. 
  3. ^ a b Karen Abbott.Saudi man prevails in hearing on bail, Rocky Mountain News, July 29, 2005
  4. ^ Karen Abbott, Saudi man prevails in hearing on bail, Rocky Mountain News. July 29, 2005
  5. ^ Daniel Pipes, Homaidan Ali Al-Turki, Colorado Slave Holder, October 2005
  6. ^ Rick Sallinger, Saudi in Aurora For Possible Terror Link, CBS Denver, October 22, 2005
  7. ^ "...A Saudi P.H.D student, Mr. Homaidan Al-Turki (36) years old and his wife Mrs. Sarah Al-Khonaizan (35) years old were jailed in U.S.A last Nov. (24) for over staying their visa and the arrest happened in a very zealous and harsh way as thirty armed Federal agents surrounded their house and pointed their guns on the wife's head asking her..." (Press release). Homaidanalturki.com. 2005-07-27. Retrieved 2013-05-09. 
  8. ^ Rape and Slavery are Basic Muslim Behaviors. Baheyeldin.com
  9. ^ a b Saudi gets long sentence, Rocky Mountain News. September 1, 2006
  10. ^ Barbara Ferguson & Samir Al-Saadi, Turki Blames Anti-Muslim Sentiment in US, Arab News. September 2, 2006
  11. ^ Rick Sallinger, Bush Asked To Pardon Saudi Man in Colorado Prison, January 17, 2008
  12. ^ Colorado Court Upholds Conviction of Saudi Arabian Man, KRDO.com, January 26, 2009
  13. ^ Turki’s case to be taken to Colorado Supreme Court, Saudi Gazette. January 2009
  14. ^ Suthers reassures Saudis:Feds back Suthers' trip to explain case of captive nanny, Rocky Mountain News
  15. ^ "Sex-slave case apparently over: Prosecutors ask to drop federal charges against Saudi man" Rocky Mountain News, September 8, 2006
  16. ^ Sarah Burnett, Sex-slave case apparently over, Rocky Mountain News, September 8, 2006
  17. ^ Video on YouTube
  18. ^ Carlos Illescas, Saudi king hears Aurora sex-slave case. Denver Post, November 18, 2006
  19. ^ Banda, P. Solomon (2011-02-25). "Saudi linguist gets sentence partially reduced". The Denver Post. Associated Press. Retrieved March 1, 2011. 
  20. ^ KoryNParker (2013-03-16). "Article Discussion: Carroll: Don't let Al-Turki go free, Col". Denver Post. Retrieved March 20, 2013. 
  21. ^ "Colorado prison chief Tom Clements shot dead at his home". news.com.au. Associated Press. 2013-03-20. Retrieved March 20, 2013. 
  22. ^ Hayden, Julie (2013-03-20). "Sources: Clements murder investigation will look at Saudi prisoner connection". FOX31 Denver. Retrieved March 20, 2013. 
  23. ^ Gurman, Sadie; Mitchell, Kirk (2013-03-21). "Tom Clements update: Saudi inmate moved to solitary confinement for protection". Denver Post. Denverpost. Retrieved March 22, 2013. 
  24. ^ Hanna, Bill (2013-03-22). "Wise County sheriff: Gunman suspected in slaying of Colorado's top prison official". star-telegram.com. Retrieved March 22, 2013. 
  25. ^ Tomasic, John (2013-03-22). "Colorado Muslims Disgusted with Biased Clements Murder Coverage". coloradoindependent.com. Retrieved March 22, 2013. 

External links[edit]