Human Security Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Human Security Act of 2007
Coat of arms of the Philippines.svg
An Act to secure the state and protect our people from terrorism
CitationRepublic Act No. 9372
Territorial extentPhilippines
Enacted byCongress of the Philippines
EnactedFebruary 8, 2007
SignedJuly 15, 2007
Bill citationRepublic Act No. 9372
terrorism, anti-terrorism legislation
Status: In force

The Human Security Act of 2007 (RA 9372) is a Philippine law that took effect on March 06, 2007.[1] This law is one of the most primary anti-terrorism law that brings the Philippines in line with its Southeast Asian neighbors battling Islamist militants. It is aimed at tackling militants in the southern Philippines.[2]

The law defines terrorism a crime by describing, "causes widespread and extraordinary fear and panic among the populace" and allows authorities to arrest terror suspects without warrants and temporarily detain them without charges.[3] Under the law, detained terrorists are entitled to see a lawyer, a priest, a doctor, or family members.


The Anti-Terror Bill was first filed in congress by Senator Juan Ponce Enrile in 1996.[4]

The final version was crafted with amendments by Senators Manny Villar and Aquilino Pimentel, Jr..[4] These revisions introduced several amendments and safeguards that have caused the law to be called "toothless" and "watered down".[2] It was ratified by the Senate on February 8, then approved by the House of Representatives during a special session two weeks later on February 19, 2007.[2][5] It was later signed into law by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo on March 6.[5] It took effect on July 15, 2007.

The Philippines had long been urged by the United States and other Western countries to bring in stricter anti-terror legislation, citing the presence of al Qaeda-linked extremists who have been blamed for bombings, beheadings, and kidnappings.[2][5]

Summarized Analysis[edit]

1. The State recognizes that the fight against terrorism requires a comprehensive approach, comprising political, economic, diplomatic, military, and legal means duly taking into account the root causes of terrorism without acknowledging these as justification for terrorist and/or criminal activities. Such measures shall include conflict management and post-conflict peace-building, addressing the roots of conflict by building state capacity and promoting equitable economic development.[6] This statement elucidates that the Philippines government has realized that a strict military approach cannot be adequate solution when dealing with terrorist groups. In this sense, the Philippines government has decided to adopt a broader and more comprehensive approach rather than only applicating a military approach.

2. Terrorism is the premeditated or threatened use of violence or force or any other means that deliberately cause harm to persons, or of force and other destructive means against property or the environment, with the intention of creating or sowing a state of danger, panic, fear, or chaos to the general public or segment thereof, or of coercing or intimidating the government to do or refrain from doing an act. [7] The law provides for a clearer definition of terrorism allowing police and security services a better understanding of the crimes at stake.[8] This statement can act as a potential deterrent to future terrorists as they will know that it is no longer possible to commit an attack and escape without being charged.

3. Arrest and Detention. Any peace office or a private person may, without warrant, arrest a person: (a)when, in his presence, the person to be arrested has committed, is actually committing, or attempting to commit any of the offense under this Act; or (b)when any of said offense has in fact been committed and he has reasonable ground to believe that the person to be arrested has committed the same. Any person arrested under this Section may be detained for a period of not more than three(3)days following his arrest for custodial investigation. [9] In previous laws related to anti-terrorism, there were many loopholes that prevented terrorists suspects from being detained.[10] However, this bill clarifies to Philippines Law Enforcement Agencies to arrest suspected terrorists without warrant and bestows the authority to detain suspects for 3 days.

International reaction[edit]

Allies in the United States-led War on Terrorism expressed confidence in the Philippines with the signing of the law. In a statement, the US Embassy said "This new law will help provide Philippine law enforcement and judicial authorities with the legal tools they need to confront the threats posed by international terrorism, while ensuring protection and civil liberties and human rights".[3] Australian Ambassador Tony Hely hailed the signing of the law and called the Philippines "a key regional counter-terrorism partner" for Australia.[3] However, the Special Rapporteur of the UN on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, Martin Scheinin, issued the following statement; that the Philippine Government should reconsider "Human Security Act of 2007" since implementation of this law can negatively affect the human rights. He stated that even though there are some positive aspects of this law, an overly broad definition can be incompatible with Article 15 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(ICCPR).[11]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Letters to the Editor: Inquirer. (2007-06-03). Why Arroyo needs anti-terror law. Retrieved 2007-11-30.
  2. ^ a b c d One-Minute World News. (2007-02-20). Philippines approves terror bill.[dead link]
  3. ^ a b c ABS-CBN Interactive[dead link]
  4. ^ a b ABS-CBN Interactive[dead link]
  5. ^ a b c Dalangin-Fernandez, Lira. (2007-05-03). Arroyo to sign anti-terror bill Tuesday[permanent dead link]. Retrieved 2007-7-27.
  6. ^ Republic of the Philippines House of Representative Bill on Human Security
  7. ^ Republic of the Philippines House of Representatives Bill on Human Security Section 3
  8. ^ "Analysis and review of the Philippines Human Security Act 2007"(March 16, 2007), Kenneth Pereire, Research Analyst of International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research
  9. ^ Republic of the Philippines House of Representatives Bill on Human Security
  10. ^ Analysis and review of the Philippines Human Security Act 2007"(March 16, 2007), Kenneth Pereire, Research Analyst of International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research
  11. ^ "OHCHR". Retrieved 2019-08-15.

External links[edit]