Ian Parker (psychologist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ian Parker
Ian parker.jpg
Born Ian Andrew Parker
1956
United Kingdom
Nationality British
Fields Critical psychology
Theoretical psychology
Discourse analysis
Deconstruction
Psychoanalytic social theory
Marxist psychology
Qualitative psychology
Institutions University of Leicester
Influences Derrida, Foucault, Lacan, Žižek

Ian Parker (born 1956) is a British psychologist who has been a principal exponent of three quite diverse critical traditions inside the discipline. His writing has provided compass points for researchers searching for alternatives to 'mainstream' psychology in the English-speaking world (that is, mainstream psychology that is based on laboratory-experimental studies that reduce behaviour to individual mental processes). He is author or co-author of 20 books, and editor or co-editor of 15 books. His books and articles have been published in 14 languages.[1]

Parker went to Ravens Wood School in Keston, Kent, UK, studied psychology at Plymouth Polytechnic and the University of Southampton, lectured at Manchester Polytechnic from 1985, was appointed Professor of Psychology at Bolton Institute in 1996, and returned to Manchester as Professor of Psychology at Manchester Metropolitan University in 2000.[2] In 2012 he was suspended for questioning, in his capacity as departmental union representative for the University and College Union, work-load and appointment procedures.[3] There was an international campaign for his reinstatement,[4] and an online petition which claimed 'victory' with 3772 signatures. In 2013 he resigned his post,[5] and moved to the University of Leicester, and also took up visiting professorial positions at Universiteit Gent, Belgium, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brasil, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain, Birkbeck University of London, UK, University of Roehampton, UK and University of Manchester, UK.[2]

The three critical traditions Parker has promoted are 'discursive analysis', 'Marxist psychology' and 'psychoanalysis'. Each of these traditions is adapted by him to encourage an attention to ideology and power, and this modification has given rise to fierce debates, not only from mainstream psychologists but also from other 'critical psychologists'. Parker moves in his writing from one focus to another, and it seems as if he is not content with any particular tradition of research, using each of the different critical traditions to throw the others into question.[6]

Parker is a practising psychoanalyst, an analyst member of the Centre for Freudian Analysis and Research, and the London Society of the New Lacanian School.[7] He is President of the College of Psychoanalysts-UK.[8] He is Professor of Management in the School of Management at the University of Leicester.[9]

Parker edited a four-volume 'major work' Critical Psychology for Routledge in 2011, and a Handbook of Critical Psychology in 2015. A collection of published and previously unpublished work appeared in six books published by Routledge in the series 'Psychology After Critique'. He edits the 'Concepts for Critical Psychology' series for Routledge, and is managing editor of the Annual Review of Critical Psychology.[10]

Discursive analysis[edit]

Discursive analysis appears in his earliest writing, which is focused on the 'crisis' in laboratory-experimental social psychology during the 1960s through to the 1980s. In his first book, The Crisis in Modern Social Psychology, and How to End It (1989), Parker uses structuralist and post-structuralist theories to disrupt the claims that psychologists make to speak a professional expert 'truth' about human psychology. Toward the end of the book he moves beyond the 'turn to language' in social psychology to a 'turn to discourse', and this, he argues, will enable critical researchers to treat psychology itself as a set of discourses or stories about people rather than as things that are universally true. Analyses of 'psychologisation' are then necessary to critical discursive work.

This argument is taken forward in Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology (1992), but now there is a discussion of the relationship between discourse and reality, and at this point Parker seems to think that ‘critical realism' might be helpful to avoid problems with 'relativism' in the social sciences. He returns to these issues ten years later in Critical Discursive Psychology (2002), but by this time he is pessimistic about the critical potential of a purely discursive approach. He prefers the term 'discursive practice'. His book on methodology, Qualitative Psychology: Introducing Radical Research (2005) includes a new version of discourse analysis that attempts to break down the divisions between the researcher and those they study.

Critical responses and commentaries on the impact of Ian Parker’s work on discourse analysis have often focused on what is seen as a reification of ‘discourse’.[by whom?] His conceptual work on discourse has been criticised on this basis from a traditional social psychological position (e.g., Abrams and Hogg, 1990) and from a 'discursive' position (e.g., Potter et al., 1990; Potter et al., 1999). Critical commentaries on his work on discourse analysis were included in his book Critical Discursive Psychology in 2002, and in the second edition of that book in 2015.

Marxist psychology[edit]

Parker employed Marxist arguments in his first book, and that book on the 'crisis' ends with a discussion of 'transitional demands' that borrow from Trotskyist politics (and these demands are designed to start from what it is reasonable to ask for but in such a way as to lead to a questioning of oppression). A co-edited book, Psychology and Society: Contradiction and Coexistence (1996) is explicitly concerned with Marxist approaches to psychology, and a note indicates that the original title was to be Psychology and Marxism. All the contributors to this book are Marxists, but using a variety of different psychological theories (and Parker’s chapter is on Trotsky and psychoanalysis).

Discussion of Marxist psychology is scattered throughout Parker’s work, and he defines himself as a Marxist,[11] and supporter of the Fourth International.[1] There is a reflection on this in the opening chapter by him of Critical Discursive Psychology, and Marxist ideas are outlined (alongside psychoanalysis, post-structuralism and feminism) in a paper 'Discursive resources in the Discourse Unit' written for the Discourse Unit, a research group which he founded with Erica Burman.[12] Recent interviews[11] indicate that feminist arguments have become more important to Parker, and that Marxism itself may not provide a complete true theory (or alternative to psychology). The discipline of psychology is now treated as an ongoing process of 'psychologisation' operating within institutions suffused with the power to define and manage individual behaviour and experience. This argument is outlined in the book Revolution in Psychology (2007).

Marxist responses to Ian Parker's work have come from Vygotskian developmental psychologists using his work in the political domain (e.g., Holzman, 1995; Newman and Holzman, 2000), and from mainstream experimental psychologists (e.g., Jost and Hardin, 1996).

Psychoanalytic theory[edit]

See also: Psychoanalysis

Psychoanalysis is discussed at length in Psychoanalytic Culture: Psychoanalytic Discourse in Western Society (1997), and traditions of theory from British, German and French psychoanalysis are examined critically. These ideas are complemented in the book by original empirical research. The book is a curious mixture of explication and analysis; Parker oscillates between a description of a psychoanalytic theory and a critical account of how it has come to seem to be true to people in Western culture. The most important conceptual contribution by him in the book is that of the 'discursive complex' to explicate how psychoanalysis operates as a social construction and in lived experience. He trained as a Lacanian psychoanalyst with the Centre for Freudian Analysis and Research in London toward the end of the 1990s,[13] and has written on psychoanalytic social theory, in his book Slavoj Žižek: A Critical Introduction (2004).

Parker’s discussion of psychoanalysis sometimes appears to be situated within a discursive or Marxist theoretical framework, but he then seems to use psychoanalytic theory as a framework to understand pathology in contemporary society. The original research in his 1997 book Psychoanalytic CultureHand 2009 book Psychoanalytic Mythologies is critical also of psychoanalysis itself. His argument is that psychoanalysis and a form of 'psychoanalytic subjectivity' has developed under capitalism, and so it is necessary to take it seriously to change society and enable individuals to change.[11] It is not clear how this use of psychoanalysis fits with his radical work on mental health, which is contained in his co-authored book Deconstructing Psychopathology (1995), which draws on action research described by him in that book, and in his edited book Deconstructing Psychotherapy (1999). (Those books draw heavily on the works of the postmodern philosophers Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida rather than the psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan.) Parker was author of Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Revolutions in Subjectivity in 2011, and co-editor (with David Pavon-Cuellar) of Lacan, Discourse, Event: New Psychoanalytic Approaches to Textual Indeterminacy in 2014, a book which connects psychoanalysis with discourse analysis. He edits the 'Lines of the Symbolic' series as Secretary of Manchester Psychoanalytic Matrix[14] for Karnac Books.[15]

Mainstream psychologists[who?] argue that Parker is not doing proper psychological research at all, and that his work is merely destructive (rather than, as he claims 'deconstructive'). These psychologists[who?] are at any rate unsympathetic to discursive approaches and to Marxism and psychoanalysis. Some psychologists[who?] who would like to use discursive or Marxist or psychoanalytic ideas have also attacked Parker, and from each direction the argument is that he distorts those ideas. His response always seems to be that these 'critical' psychologists want to be accepted by the discipline, and this has sometimes led to bitter public disputes.[citation needed]

Ian Parker's work on psychoanalysis in relation to discourse theory has been discussed in cultural psychology forums (e.g., Hurme, 1995) and in psychoanalytic journals (e.g., Blackwell, 1996; Hinshelwood, 1996).

The three strands are sometimes referred to by Parker and other writers as part of 'critical psychology'. It seems clear though, that Parker does not want to build a 'critical psychology' as an alternative to mainstream psychology, for he believes that this would simply reinforce the power of psychologists. Instead of improving psychology, he still wants (as the subtitle of his first book indicates) 'to end it'. Instead of developing psychology as a science to help understand individuals, he furthers a 'critical' Freudian and Marxist agenda undermining the governments of countries he is invited to.[16][17] Hostility to his own discipline of psychology is combined with support for the far-right pop-group Laibach.[18]

Publications[edit]

Books[edit]

  • Parker, I. (1989) The Crisis in Modern Social Psychology, and how to end it, London and New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-01494-8
  • Parker, I. (1992) Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology, London and New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-05018-9
  • Banister, P., Burman, E., Parker, I., Taylor, M. and Tindall, C. (1994) Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide, Milton Keynes: Open University Press. ISBN 0335191819
  • Foster, J. J. and Parker, I. (1995) Carrying Out Investigations in Psychology, Leicester: British Psychological Society. ISBN 1-85433-170-1
  • Parker, I., Georgaca, E., Harper, D., McLaughlin, T. and Stowell Smith, M. (1995) Deconstructing Psychopathology, London: Sage. ISBN 0-8039-7481-7
  • Parker, I. (1997) Psychoanalytic Culture: Psychoanalytic Discourse in Western Society, London: Sage. ISBN 0-7619-5643-3
  • Parker, I. and the Bolton Discourse Network (1999) Critical Textwork: An Introduction to Varieties of Discourse and Analysis, Buckingham: Open University Press. ISBN 0-335-20204-7
  • Parker, I. (2002) Critical Discursive Psychology. London: Palgrave. ISBN 033397381X
  • Parker, I. (2005) Qualitative Psychology: Introducing Radical Research. Buckingham: Open University Press. ISBN 0335213499
  • Parker, I. (2007) Revolution in Psychology: Alienation to Emancipation. London: Pluto Press. ISBN 978-0-7453-2535-4
  • Parker, I. (2008) Japan in Analysis: Cultures of the Unconscious. London: Palgrave. ISBN 978-0230506916
  • Parker, I. (2009) Psychoanalytic Mythologies. London: Anthem Press. ISBN 978-1843313038
  • Parker, I. (2014) The Crisis in Modern Social Psychology, and how to end it. Abingdon/New York: Routledge [Psychology Revivals, original published 1989]. ISBN 978-0-415-70645-2
  • Parker, I. (2014) Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology. Abingdon/New York: Routledge [Psychology Revivals, original published 1992]. ISBN 978-0-415-70638-4
  • Parker, I. (2015) Handbook of Critical Psychology. London and New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84872-218-7
  • Parker, I. (2015) Critical Discursive Psychology (2nd Edition). London: Palgrave Macmillan. [ISBN 9781137485595
  • Parker, I. (2015) Psychology After the Crisis: Scientific paradigms and political debate. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84872-207-1
  • Parker, I. (2015) Psychology After Deconstruction: Erasure and Social Reconstruction. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84872-209-5
  • Parker, I. (2015) Psychology After Discourse Analysis: Concepts, methods, critique. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84872-211-8
  • Parker, I. (2015) Psychology After Psychoanalysis: Psychosocial studies and beyond. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84872-213-2
  • Parker, I. (2015) Psychology After the Unconscious: From Freud to Lacan. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84872-215-6
  • Parker, I. (2015) Psychology After Lacan: Connecting the clinic and research. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84872-217-0

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b "Ian Parker". www.parkerian.com. Retrieved 2016-02-29. 
  2. ^ a b "www.parkerian.com". 
  3. ^ "www.parkerian.com". 
  4. ^ "www.independent.co.uk". 
  5. ^ "www.manchesteveningnews.co.uk". 
  6. ^ https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-27/edition-7/one-one-ian-parker.  Missing or empty |title= (help)
  7. ^ http://londonsociety-nls.org.uk/index.php?file=Members.html.  Missing or empty |title= (help)
  8. ^ http://www.psychoanalysis-cpuk.org/HTML/About.htm.  Missing or empty |title= (help)
  9. ^ http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/management/people/iparker.  Missing or empty |title= (help)
  10. ^ http://www.discourseunit.com/annual-review.  Missing or empty |title= (help)
  11. ^ a b c http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/558.  Missing or empty |title= (help)
  12. ^ "Discourse Unit". www.discourseunit.com. Retrieved 2016-02-29. 
  13. ^ "www.parkerian.com". 
  14. ^ http://www.discourseunit.com/manchester-psychoanalytic-matrix.  Missing or empty |title= (help)
  15. ^ http://www.karnacbooks.com/SeriesDetail.asp?SID=110.  Missing or empty |title= (help)
  16. ^ http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article2373.  Missing or empty |title= (help)
  17. ^ http://socialistresistance.org/3891/psychology-and-marxism-in-mexico.  Missing or empty |title= (help)
  18. ^ https://www.opendemocracy.net/ian-parker/spectre-i-see-red-door-and-i-want-it-painted-black.  Missing or empty |title= (help)