The Immortal Game was a chess game played by Adolf Anderssen and Lionel Kieseritzky on 21 June 1851 in London, during a break of the first international tournament. The bold sacrifices made by Anderssen to secure victory have made it one of the most famous chess games of all time. Anderssen gave up both rooks and a bishop, then his queen, checkmating his opponent with his three remaining minor pieces. In 1996, Bill Hartson called the game an achievement "perhaps unparalleled in chess literature".
This section does not cite any sources. (May 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Adolf Anderssen was one of the strongest players of his time, and many consider him to have been the world's strongest player after his victory in the London 1851 chess tournament. Lionel Kieseritzky lived in France much of his life, where he gave chess lessons, and played games for five francs an hour at the Café de la Régence in Paris. His strength was shown most favourably when giving great odds to weak players; against masters, he was less convincing.
Played between the two great players at the Simpson's-in-the-Strand Divan in London, the Immortal Game was an informal one, played during a break in a formal tournament. Kieseritzky was very impressed when the game was over, and telegraphed the moves of the game to his Parisian chess club. The French chess magazine La Régence published the game in July 1851. This game was nicknamed "The Immortal Game" in 1855 by the Austrian Ernst Falkbeer.
This game is acclaimed as an excellent demonstration of the romantic style of chess play in the 19th century, where rapid and attack were considered the most effective way to win, where many gambits and counter-gambits were offered (and not accepting them would be considered slightly ungentlemanly), and where was often held in contempt. These games, with their rapid attacks and counter-attacks, are often entertaining to review, even if some of the moves would no longer be considered the best by today's standards.
In this game, Anderssen wins despite sacrificing a bishop (on move 11), both rooks (starting on move 18), and the queen (on move 22) to produce checkmate against Kieseritzky who only lost three pawns. He offered both rooks to show that two active pieces are worth a dozen inactive pieces. Anderssen later demonstrated the same kind of approach in the Evergreen Game.
Some published versions of the game have errors, as described in the annotations.
|This section uses algebraic notation to describe chess moves.|
1. e4 e5 2. f4
- This is the King's Gambit: Anderssen offers his pawn in exchange for faster development. Although this was a common opening in the nineteenth century, it is less common today, as defensive techniques have improved since Anderssen's time.
- Kieseritzky accepts the gambit; this variant is thus called the King's Gambit Accepted.
3. Bc4 Qh4+
- The Bishop's Gambit. Black's move will force White to move his king and White will not be able to castle, but this move also places Black's queen in peril, and White can eventually attack it with gain of tempo with Ng1–f3.
4. Kf1 b5?!
- This is the Bryan Countergambit, deeply analysed by Kieseritzky, and which sometimes bears his name. It is not considered a move by most players today.
5. Bxb5 Nf6 6. Nf3
- This is a common developing move, but in addition the knight attacks Black's queen, forcing Black to move it instead of developing his own side.
6... Qh6 7. d3
- With this move, White solidifies control of the critical of the board. German grandmaster Robert Hübner recommends 7.Nc3 instead.
- This move threatens Ng3+, and protects the pawn at f4, but it also sidelines the knight to a poor position at the edge of the board, where knights are the least powerful.
8. Nh4 Qg5
- Better was 8...g6, according to Kieseritzky.
9. Nf5 c6
- This simultaneously unpins the and attacks the bishop. However, modern chess engines have suggested 9...g6 would be better, to deal with a very troublesome knight. Notice how the players have both developed one or two pieces, then moved them again and again.
- This is an advantageous passive piece sacrifice. If Black accepts, his queen will be moved away from the action, giving White a lead in development.
- Hübner believes this was Black's critical mistake; this gains , but loses in development, at a point where White's strong development is able to quickly mount an offensive. Hübner recommends 11...h5 instead.
- White's knight at f5 protects the pawn, which attacks Black's queen.
12... Qg6 13. h5 Qg5 14. Qf3
- White (Anderssen) now has two threats:
- Bxf4, trapping Black's queen (the queen having no safe place to go);
- e5, attacking Black's knight at f6 while simultaneously exposing an attack by White's queen on the unprotected black rook at a8.
- This deals with the threats, but undevelops Black even further—now the only black piece not on its starting square is the queen, which is about to be put on the run, while White has control over a great deal of the board.
15. Bxf4 Qf6 16. Nc3 Bc5
- An ordinary developing move by Black, which also attacks the rook at g1.
- White responds to the attack with a counterattack. This move threatens the black queen and also Nc7+, forking the king and rook. Richard Réti recommends 17.d4 followed by 18.Nd5, with advantage to White, although if 17.d4 Bf8 then 18.Be5 would be a stronger move.
- Black gains a pawn, and threatens to gain the rook at a1 with check.
- With this move White offers to sacrifice both his rooks. Hübner comments that, from this position, there are actually many ways to win, and he believes there are at least three better moves than 18.Bd6: 18.d4, 18.Be3, or 18.Re1, which lead to strong positions or checkmate without needing to sacrifice so much material. The Chessmaster computer program annotation says "the main point [of this move] is to divert the black queen from the a1–h8 diagonal. Now Black cannot play 18...Bxd6? 19.Nxd6+ Kd8 20.Nxf7+ Ke8 21.Nd6+ Kd8 22.Qf8#." Garry Kasparov comments that the world of chess would have lost one of its "crown jewels" if the game had continued in such an unspectacular fashion. The Bd6 move is surprising, because White is willing to give up so much material.
- The move leading to Black's defeat. Wilhelm Steinitz suggested in 1879 that a better move would be 18...Qxa1+; likely moves to follow are 19.Ke2 Qb2 20.Kd2 Bxg1.
- This sacrifices yet another white rook. More importantly, this move blocks the queen from participating in the defense of the king, and threatens mate in two: 20.Nxg7+ Kd8 21.Bc7#.
19... Qxa1+ 20. Ke2
- At this point, Black's attack has run out of steam; Black has a queen and bishop on the , but cannot effectively mount an immediate attack on White, while White can storm forward. According to Kieseritzky, he at this point. Hübner notes that an article by Friedrich Amelung in the journal Baltische Schachblaetter, 1893, reported that Kiesertizky probably played 20...Na6, but Anderssen then announced the mating moves. The Oxford Companion to Chess also says that Black resigned at this point, citing an 1851 publication. In any case, it is suspected that the last few moves were not actually played on the board in the original game.
- The black knight covers the c7-square as White was threatening 21.Nxg7+ Kd8 and 22.Bc7#. Another attempt to defend would be 20...Ba6 allowing the black king to flee via Kc8 and Kb7, although White has enough with the continuation 21.Nc7+ Kd8 and 22.Nxa6, where if now 22...Qxa2 (to defend f7 against Bc7+, Nd6+ and Qxf7#) White can play 23.Bc7+ Ke8 24.Nb4 winning; or if 22...Bb6 (stopping Bc7+) 23.Qxa8 Qc3 24.Qxb8+ Qc8 25.Qxc8+ Kxc8 26.Bf8 h6 27.Nd6+ Kd8 28.Nxf7+ Ke8 29.Nxh8 Kxf8 with a winning endgame for White.
21. Nxg7+ Kd8 22. Qf6+!
- This queen sacrifice forces Black to give up his defense of e7.
22... Nxf6 23. Be7# 1–0
- At the end, Black is ahead in material by a considerable margin: a queen, two rooks, and a bishop. But the material does not help Black. White has been able to use his remaining pieces—two knights and a bishop—to force mate.
Savielly Tartakower described this as "a beautiful game".
- In Poul Anderson's 1954 short story of the same name, computer chess programs reproduce the Immortal Game's moves.
- David Shenk provides a move-by-move description of the game intermittently within the narrative of his 2007 work, The Immortal Game: A History of Chess, or How 32 Carved Pieces on a Board Illuminated Our Understanding of War, Art, Science and the Human Brain (ISBN 0385510101)
- The Immortal Game, a 1999 novel by Mark Coggins that featured the famous chess game (ISBN 0918395186)
- The Immortal Game: The Movie, by director Michael Mertineit, uses a set of military pieces from the 19th century to animate the game.
- Dragon Age Inquisition can have the characters Solas and Iron Bull play the game move-for-move in their heads in party banter, respectively taking on the roles of Anderssen and Kieseritzky.
- Blade Runner, 1982 film by director Ridley Scott, uses the last 3 moves in this game as a way for the Replicant Batty to enter the Tyrell Corporation.
- In the animated music video for Gorillaz' song Humility, Noodle can be seen acting out the final move of the game.
- Hartston, Bill (1996). Teach Yourself Chess. Hodder & Stoughton. p. 150. ISBN 0-340-67039-8.
- Kling and Horwitz: The Chess Player, July 1851
- Anderssen was playing the black pieces but moved first, so is shown here as playing White to match modern conventions regarding White and Black.
- Kasparov, 2003, My Great Predecessors, part I, p. 24
- Several sources give a different move sequence: 18...Qxa1+ 19. Ke2 Bxg1 20. e5.
- Hooper & Whyld (1992)
- Anderson, Poul (February 1954). "The Immortal Game". The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction. pp. 115–124.
- Chernev, Irving. The Chess Companion. 1968. ISBN 0-671-20104-2.
- Eade, James. Chess for Dummies. 1996. Foster City, CA: IDG Books Worldwide, Inc. ISBN 0-7645-5003-9.
- Hooper, David; Whyld, Kenneth (1992), "Immortal Game", The Oxford Companion to Chess (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-280049-3
- Hübner, Robert. "The Immortal Game." American Chess Journal, 3 (1995), p. 14-35.
- Kasparov, Garry (2003). My Great Predecessors, part I. Everyman Chess. ISBN 1-85744-330-6.
- Kavalek, Lubomir. Chess (newspaper column). Washington Post. July 2003.
- Savielly Tartakower and J. du Mont. 500 Master Games of Chess. Dover Publications, June 1, 1975, ISBN 0-486-23208-5.
- Shenk, David (2006). The Immortal Game: A History of Chess. Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-51010-1.
- Lionel Kieseritzky: La Régence, July 1851
- Kling und Horwitz: The Chess Player, July 1851
- The Immortal Game in portable game notation (a popular variation with incorrect 18...Qxa1+, not 18...Bxg1)
- The Immortal Game in portable game notation (with comments by Lionel Kieseritzky as reported in "La Regence" (1851, pp. 221–22))
- Adolf Anderssen vs Lionel Adalbert Bagration Felix Kieseritsky Chessgames.com