# Incoherent broad-band cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy

Incoherent broad band cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy (IBBCEAS),[1] sometimes called broadband cavity enhanced extinction spectroscopy (IBBCEES), measures the transmission of light intensity through a stable optical cavity consisting of high reflectance mirrors(typically R>99.9%). The technique is realized using incoherent sources of radiation e.g. Xenon arc lamps, LEDs or supercontinuum (SC) lasers, hence the name.

Typically in IBBCEAS, the wavelength selection of the transmitted light takes place after the cavity by either dispersive or interferometric means. The light is either directly focused onto the entrance slit of a monochromator and imaged onto a charged coupled device (CCD) array via a dispersive optical element (e.g. a reflection grating) or imaged onto the entrance aperture of a conventional interferometer. The spectrum is reconstructed taking the Fourier transform of the recorded interferogram.

Similar to other cavity enhanced spectroscopic techniques, in IBBCEAS, the transmission signal strength is measured with and without the absorber of interest present inside the cavity ( I(λ) and I0(λ) respectively). From the ratio of the wavelength-dependent transmitted intensities, the effective reflectivity of the mirrors Reff(λ) and the sample path length per pass d inside the cavity, the sample's extinction coefficient α(λ) is calculated as:

${\displaystyle \alpha (\lambda )=\left({\frac {I_{0}(\lambda )}{I(\lambda )}}-1\right){\frac {1-R_{\text{eff}}(\lambda )}{d}}}$

The sensitivity (smallest achievable α for a given sample) increases for large mirror reflectivities and large path lengths in the cavity, which is maximal, if d equals the cavity length.(1-Reff) includes all unspecified losses per pass (e.g. scattering or diffraction losses) other than the losses due to the limited reflectivity of the cavity mirrors. Note that although the technique is often used for studying absorption, total light extinction, α, is retrieved, and it therefore measures the sum of absorption and scattering.

The advantages of IBBCEAS include:

• Unlike CRDS, the sensitivity is dependent on the light source stability and the measurement accuracy of the transmitted intensity.
• It requires a reliable calibration procedure to determine baseline optical losses of the system (often performed by calibration of reflectivity as a function of wavelength using known concentrations of sample in the cavity).
• Lower spectral resolution compared to laser based methods.

## Measurement Principle IBBCEAS - Detailed Description

Schematic of light passing an optical cavity. Note that the arrows only illustrate time-dependence of the light intensity and not its spatial distribution inside the cavity. For instance, if injected on-axis, all reflections happen symmetrically distributed around the optical axis.

When the optical cavity is illuminated by an incoherent broadband light source like the white light of a lamp or LED, the mode structure of the cavity intensity can be neglected.[1] Consider a cavity of length d formed by two identical high reflectivity mirrors(R1 = R2 = R > 99.9%) with losses L, which is continuously excited with incoherent light of intensity Iin. For an empty resonator with L = 0, the time integrated transmitted intensity I0 is given by

${\displaystyle I_{0}=I_{in}{\frac {1-R}{1+R}}}$

The intensity of light transmitted by the cavity, I( = I0 + I1 + I2 + ⋯ ), can be described by the superposition of the light after an odd number of passes, leading to a geometric series:

${\displaystyle I=I_{in}(1-R)^{2}(1-L)\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }R^{2n}(1-L)^{2n}}$

Since R < 1 and L < 1 the series converges to:

${\displaystyle I=I_{in}{\frac {(1-R)^{2}(1-L)}{1-R^{2}(1-L)^{2}}}}$

Assuming the losses per pass to be solely due to Lambert-Beer attenuation, i.e. (1 − L) = e(-αd), the extinction coefficient, α can be written as

${\displaystyle \alpha ={\frac {1}{d}}\left\vert \ln \left({\frac {1}{2R^{2}}}\left({\sqrt {4R^{2}+\left({\frac {I_{0}}{I}}(R^{2}-1)\right)^{2}}}+{\frac {I_{0}}{I}}(R^{2}-1)\right)\right)\right\vert }$

In case of small losses per pass, L → 0, and high reﬂectivities of the mirrors, R → 1, α can then be approximated as

${\displaystyle \alpha \approx {\frac {1}{d}}\left({\frac {I_{0}}{I}}-1\right)(1-R)}$

Approximating Δ I / I 0 ≈ (I 0 - I) / I 0 ≈ (I 0 - I) / I, the minimum absorption coefficient, αmin, can be expressed by the following equation:

${\displaystyle \alpha _{min}={\frac {1}{d}}\left({\frac {\Delta I_{min}}{I_{0}}}\right)(1-R)}$

where Δ I min is the minimum detectable change in intensity smaller than I_{0}. The maximum sensitivity (for given R and d) is limited by the intensity of the lamp, the dispersion of the monochromator, and the noise of the detector.The above equation demonstrates that the effective path length is (1-R)−1 times longer than that of a conventional single pass experiment. Fiedler et al. have studied in detail the influence of cavity parameters like the cavity length, mirror curvature and reflectivity, different light injection geometries on the IBBCEAS signal.[2]

## Experimental Setup

A basic IBBCEAS setup consists of an incoherent light source, collimation optics, the absorber of interest and a detector. The incoherent source of radiation is spectrally filtered to match the bandwidth of the high reflectivity cavity mirrors. The filtered light is passively coupled into a stable optical cavity formed by two mirrors. Due to the high reflectivity of the mirrors effective absorption path lengths can reach a few kilometres. Light transmitted through the cavity is detected using a suitable detector, for example, a monochromator / charge coupled device (CCD) combination interfaced with a computer. To obtain quantitative results, the reflectivity of the mirrors must be accurately determined. This is usually accomplished by measuring the reflectivity as a function of wavelength using known concentrations of a calibration sample inside the cavity. By knowing the number density n (molecules/cm3) and wavelength-dependent absorption cross-section of the calibration sample, the effective reflectivity Reff(λ) can be determined by:

${\displaystyle R_{\text{eff}}(\lambda )=1-\sigma (\lambda )nd\left({\frac {I_{0}}{I}}-1\right)^{-1}}$

where σ(λ) is the known absorption cross-section of the gas and d is the length of the cavity.

## Fourier Transform Incoherent Broadband Cavity Enhanced Spectroscopy (FT-IBBCEAS)

Fourier Transform Incoherent Broadband Cavity Enhanced Spectroscopy (FT-IBBCEAS) is a variant of IBBCEAS which uses a Fourier transform spectrometer/photodiode instead of the conventional monochromator/CCD in order to establish a spectrum. In this case, the absorption is determined from the Fourier Transform of the intensity of light escaping the cavity. The combination of a Fourier transform spectrometer allows for high spectral resolution to be achievable, however, at the expense of good temporal resolution, making the technique less suitable for kinetic studies. On the other hand, the approach provides an improvement to conventional Fourier Transform spectroscopy for gas applications where small sample volumes are required (e.g. for discharges, combustion plasmas, flames or chemical flow reactors).

The figure above shows the spin forbidden O2 b-band at ~ 14500 cm−1 (688 nm) measured[3] in ambient air at atmospheric pressure using a xenon arc lamp compared against a calculated HITRAN spectrum. The cavity was formed by two dielectric high reflectivity mirrors (R>0.996 at 662 nm) separated by 89 cm. The characteristic doublets of the O2 b-band and the bandhead of the R branch are visible in the experimental spectrum. In order to fully exploit the selectivity feature of Fourier transform spectroscopy, the near infrared region is of interest because many overtone spectra of atmospherically relevant gases are located in this part of the spectrum. Some of these studies include the detection of overtone bands of CO2, OCS,[4] CH3CN[5] and HD18O in the near IR.[6]

## Applications of IBBCEAS

• Pollution monitoring
• Combustion Diagnostics
• Atmospheric trace gas detection
• Aerosol science
• Breath Analysis
• Fundamental Science and Research
• Chemical Reaction Kinetics

## Selected Literature

Since its development in 2003, IBBCEAS has been used with a wide variety of incoherent light sources, including arc lamps, LEDs, SLEDs and supercontinnum sources.

### Arc lamp

IBBCEAS was first demonstrated[1] on the basis of the spin and symmetry forbidden γ-band ${\displaystyle b^{1}\Sigma _{g}^{+}(v^{'}=2)\leftarrow X^{3}\Sigma _{g}^{-}(v^{''}=0)}$ of molecular oxygen using a short-arc Xe lamp. The application of IBBCEAS to isolated jet cooled gas-phase species was demonstrated in continuous supersonic jets almost a decade ago[7] and recently, to pulsed jets.[8] Arc lamps have been used for cavities as small as 80 mm to study optical absorption of liquids[9] and very long cavities of 20 m length[10] for sensitive in situ measurements of NO3 and NO2 concentrations in an atmospheric simulation chamber. Recent studies have demonstrated their application in Evanescent Wave-IBBCEAS using a mirror-prism-mirror cavity configuration to measure absorption spectra of metallo-porphyrins in thin solution layers.[11] Other applications of Xe lamp based IBBCEAS include its combination with discharge flow tubes for absorption measurements of marine boundary layer species like I2, IO and OIO,[12] and for measuring weak near-UV[13] and visible[14] gas phase absorption spectra.

### LEDs

IBBCEAS has been used in conjunction with LEDs[15][16][17][18] and superluminescent LEDs[19] in a number of gas phase[20][21][22] and liquid analyte[23][24][25] studies. Simultaneous concentration measurements of NO2 and NO3 have been achieved using LED based IBBCEAS within the ppbv detection limit.[20] The advantages of using LEDs as light source are their compactness, long life, power efficiency and price. Also, due to the small area emission, the emitted power per unit area at the peak wavelength can approach that of Xe arc lamps. However, the LED output is often temperature dependent; hence they require temperature stabilization for IBBCEAS applications. More recently, LED-IBBCEAS has been applied to simultaneous open path measurements of HONO and NO2 in the UV region with detection limits of 430 pptv and 1 ppbv respectively and acquisition times in the order of a few seconds.[22]

### Supercontinuum radiation sources

SC sources are attractive for spectroscopic applications owing to their broad wavelength coverage, which enables spectral signatures of multiple species to be detected simultaneously.[26][27] In comparison to lamps and LEDs, these sources provide higher spectral brightness, permitting more rapid measurements to be performed. Detection sensitivities at picomolar concentration levels in solution have been reported for BBCEAS measurements with SC sources with signal acquisition times in the lower millisecond range.[28] Though initial studies on FT-IBBCEAS reported lower sensitivities in comparison with CRDS experiments,[4] more recent breath analysis applications with supercontinuum sources[29] have reported sensitivities in the order of 10−9 cm−1 within 4 minutes acquisition time.

## References

1. ^ a b c Fiedler, S. E.; Hese, A. and Ruth, A. A. Incoherent broad-band cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 371, 284.
2. ^ Fiedler, S. E.; Hese, A. and Heitmann, U. Influence of the cavity parameters on the output intensity in incoherent broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2007, 78, 073104.
3. ^ Ruth, A. A.; Orphal, J. and Fiedler, S. E. Fourier-transform cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy using an incoherent broadband light source, Appl. Opt. 2007, 46, 3611.
4. ^ a b Orphal, J. and Ruth, A. A. High-resolution Fourier-transform cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy in the near-infrared using an incoherent broad-band light source, Opt. Exp. , 2008, 16, 19232.
5. ^ O'Leary, D. M.; Ruth, A. A.; Dixneuf, S.; Orphal, J. and Varma, R. The near infrared cavity-enhanced absorption spectrum of methyl cyanide, J. Quant. Spec. & Rad. Trans., 2012, 113, 1138.
6. ^ Down, M. J.; Tennyson, J.; Orphal, J.; Chelin, P. and Ruth, A. A. Analysis of an 18O and D enhanced water spectrum and new assignments for HD18O and D218O in the near-infrared region (6000–7000 cm−1) using newly calculated variational line lists, J. Mol. Spec., 2012, 282, 1.
7. ^ Fiedler, S. E.; Hoheisel, G.; Ruth, A. A. and Hese, A. Incoherent broad-band cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy of azulene in a supersonic jet, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 382, 447.
8. ^ Walsh, A.; Zhao, D. and Linnartz, H. Cavity enhanced plasma self-absorption spectroscopy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 091111.
9. ^ Fiedler, S. E., Hese, A. and Ruth, A. A. Rev. Sci. Instrum. Incoherent broad-band cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy of liquids, 2005, 76, 023107.
10. ^ Varma, R. M.; Venables, D. S.; Ruth, A. A.; Heitmann, U.; Schlosser, E. and Dixneuf, S. Long optical cavities for open path monitoring of atmospheric trace gases and aerosol extinction, App. Opt. 2009, 48, B159.
11. ^ Ruth, A. A. and Lynch, K. T. Incoherent broadband cavity-enhanced total internal reflection spectroscopy of surface adsorbed metalloporphyrins, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 7098.
12. ^ Vaughan, S.; Gherman, T.; Ruth, A. A. and Orphal, J. Incoherent broad-band cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy of the marine boundary layer species I2, IO and OIO, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 4471.
13. ^ Chen, J. and Venables, D. S. A broadband optical cavity spectrometer for measuring weak near-ultraviolet absorption spectra of gases, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2011, 4, 425.
14. ^ Washenfelder, R. A.; Langford, A. O.; Fuchs, H and Brown, S. S. Measurement of glyoxal using an incoherent broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2008, 8, 7779.
15. ^ Langridge, J. M.; Ball, S. M.; Shillings, A. J. L. and Jones, R. L. A broadband absorption spectrometer using light emitting diodes for ultrasensitive, in situ trace gas detection, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2008, 79, 123110.
16. ^ Langridge, J. M.; Ball, S. M. and Jones, R. L. A compact broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectrometer for detection of atmospheric NO2 using light emitting diodes, Analyst, 2006, 131, 916.
17. ^ Ball, S. M.; Langridge, J. M. and Jones, R. L. Broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy using light emitting diodes, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 398, 68.
18. ^ Gherman, T.; Venables, D. S.; Vaughan, S.; Orphal, J. and Ruth, A. A. Incoherent Broadband Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy in the near-Ultraviolet: Application to HONO and NO2, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 890.
19. ^ Denzer, W.; Hamilton, M. L.; Hancock, G.; Islam, M.; Langley, C. E.; Peverall, R. and Ritchie, G. A. D. Near-infrared broad-band cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy using a superluminescent light emitting diode, Analyst, 2009, 134, 2220.
20. ^ a b Triki, M.; Cermak, P.; Méjean, G. and Romanini, D. Cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy with a red LED source for NOx trace analysis, Appl. Phys. B. 2008, 91, 195.
21. ^ Wu, T.; Zhao, W.; Chen, W.; Zhang, W. and Gao, X. Incoherent broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy for in situ measurements of NO2 with a blue light emitting diode, Appl. Phys. B. 2009, 94, 85.
22. ^ a b Wu, T.; Chen, W.; Fertein, E.; Cazier, F.; Dewaele, D. And Gao, X. Development of an open-path incoherent broadband cavity-enhanced spectroscopy based instrument for simultaneous measurement of HONO and NO2 in ambient air, Appl. Phys. B. 2012, 106, 501.
23. ^ Seetohul, L. N.; Ali, Z. and Islam, M. Liquid-phase broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy (BBCEAS) studies in a 20 cm cell, Analyst, 2009, 134, 1887.
24. ^ Islam, M.; Seetohul, L. N. and Ali, Z. Liquid-Phase Broadband Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy Measurements in a 2 mm Cuvette, Appl. Spec., 2007, 61, 649.
25. ^ Gomez, A. L.; Renzi, R. F.; Fruetel, J. A. and Bambha, R. P. Integrated fiber optic incoherent broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy detector for near-IR absorption measurements of nanoliter samples, Appl. Opt. 2012, 51, 2532.
26. ^ Stelmaszczyk, K.; Rohwetter, P.; Fechner, M.; Queisser, M.; Czyżewski, A.; Stacewicz, T. and Wöste, L. Cavity Ring-Down Absorption Spectrography based on filament-generated supercontinuum light, Opt. Exp. 2009, 17, 3673.
27. ^ Langridge, J. M.; Laurila, T.; Watt, R. S.; Jones, R. L.; Kaminski, C. F. and Hult, J. Cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy of multiple trace gas species using a supercontinuum radiation source, Opt. Exp. 2008, 16, 10178.
28. ^ Kiwanuka, S-S.; Laurila, T. and Kaminski, C. F. Sensitive method for the kinetic measurement of trace species in liquids using cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy with broad bandwidth supercontinuum radiation, Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7498.
29. ^ Denzer, W.; Hancock, G.; Islam, M.; Langley, C. E.; Peverall, R.; Ritchie, G. A. D. and Taylor, D. Trace species detection in the near infrared us-ing Fourier transform broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy: initial studies on potential breath analytes, Analyst, 2011, 136, 801.