Independent set (graph theory)
In graph theory, an independent set or stable set is a set of vertices in a graph, no two of which are adjacent. That is, it is a set S of vertices such that for every two vertices in S, there is no edge connecting the two. Equivalently, each edge in the graph has at most one endpoint in S. The size of an independent set is the number of vertices it contains. Independent sets have also been called internally stable sets.
A maximal independent set is either an independent set such that adding any other vertex to the set forces the set to contain an edge or the set of all vertices of the empty graph.
A maximum independent set is an independent set of largest possible size for a given graph G. This size is called the independence number of G, and denoted α(G). The problem of finding such a set is called the maximum independent set problem and is an NP-hard optimization problem. As such, it is unlikely that there exists an efficient algorithm for finding a maximum independent set of a graph.
Every maximum independent set also is maximal, but the converse implication does not necessarily hold.
- 1 Properties
- 2 Finding independent sets
- 3 Software for searching maximum independent set
- 4 See also
- 5 Notes
- 6 References
- 7 External links
Relationship to other graph parameters
A set is independent if and only if it is a clique in the graph’s complement, so the two concepts are complementary. In fact, sufficiently large graphs with no large cliques have large independent sets, a theme that is explored in Ramsey theory.
A set is independent if and only if its complement is a vertex cover. Therefore, the sum of the size of the largest independent set α(G), and the size of a minimum vertex cover β(G), is equal to the number of vertices in the graph.
A vertex coloring of a graph G corresponds to a partition of its vertex set into independent subsets. Hence the minimal number of colors needed in a vertex coloring, the chromatic number χ(G), is at least the quotient of the number of vertices in G and the independent number α(G).
Maximal independent set
An independent set that is not the subset of another independent set is called maximal. Such sets are dominating sets. Every graph contains at most 3n/3 maximal independent sets, but many graphs have far fewer. The number of maximal independent sets in n-vertex cycle graphs is given by the Perrin numbers, and the number of maximal independent sets in n-vertex path graphs is given by the Padovan sequence. Therefore, both numbers are proportional to powers of 1.324718, the plastic number.
Finding independent sets
- In the maximum independent set problem, the input is an undirected graph, and the output is a maximum independent set in the graph. If there are multiple maximum independent sets, only one need be output. This problem is sometimes referred to as "vertex packing".
- In the maximum-weight independent set problem, the input is an undirected graph with weights on its vertices and the output is an independent set with maximum total weight. The maximum independent set problem is the special case in which all weights are one.
- In the maximal independent set listing problem, the input is an undirected graph, and the output is a list of all its maximal independent sets. The maximum independent set problem may be solved using as a subroutine an algorithm for the maximal independent set listing problem, because the maximum independent set must be included among all the maximal independent sets.
- In the independent set decision problem, the input is an undirected graph and a number k, and the output is a Boolean value: true if the graph contains an independent set of size k, and false otherwise.
The first three of these problems are all important in practical applications; the independent set decision problem is not, but is necessary in order to apply the theory of NP-completeness to problems related to independent sets.
Maximum independent sets and maximum cliques
The independent set problem and the clique problem are complementary: a clique in G is an independent set in the complement graph of G and vice versa. Therefore, many computational results may be applied equally well to either problem. For example, the results related to the clique problem have the following corollaries:
- The independent set decision problem is NP-complete, and hence it is not believed that there is an efficient algorithm for solving it.
- The maximum independent set problem is NP-hard and it is also hard to approximate.
Despite the close relationship between maximum cliques and maximum independent sets in arbitrary graphs, the independent set and clique problems may be very different when restricted to special classes of graphs. For instance, for sparse graphs (graphs in which the number of edges is at most a constant times the number of vertices in any subgraph), the maximum clique has bounded size and may be found exactly in linear time; however, for the same classes of graphs, or even for the more restricted class of bounded degree graphs, finding the maximum independent set is MAXSNP-complete, implying that, for some constant c (depending on the degree) it is NP-hard to find an approximate solution that comes within a factor of c of the optimum.
Finding maximum independent sets
The maximum independent set problem is NP-hard. However, it can be solved more efficiently than the O(n2 2n) time that would be given by a naive brute force algorithm that examines every vertex subset and checks whether it is an independent set.
An algorithm of Robson (1986) solves the problem in time O(1.2108n) using exponential space. When restricted to polynomial space, there is a time O(1.2127n) algorithm which improves upon a simpler O(1.2209n) algorithm.
For many classes of graphs, a maximum weight independent set may be found in polynomial time. Famous examples are claw-free graphs, P5-free graphs and perfect graphs. For chordal graphs, a maximum weight independent set can be found in linear time.
Modular decomposition is a good tool for solving the maximum weight independent set problem; the linear time algorithm on cographs is the basic example for that. Another important tool are clique separators as described by Tarjan.
In a bipartite graph, all nodes that are not in the minimum vertex cover can be included in maximum independent set; see König's theorem. Therefore, minimum vertex covers can be found using a bipartite matching algorithm.
In general, the maximum independent set problem cannot be approximated to a constant factor in polynomial time (unless P = NP). In fact, Max Independent Set in general is Poly-APX-complete, meaning it is as hard as any problem that can be approximated to a polynomial factor. However, there are efficient approximation algorithms for restricted classes of graphs.
In planar graphs, the maximum independent set may be approximated to within any approximation ratio c < 1 in polynomial time; similar polynomial-time approximation schemes exist in any family of graphs closed under taking minors.
In bounded degree graphs, effective approximation algorithms are known with approximation ratios that are constant for a fixed value of the maximum degree; for instance, a greedy algorithm that forms a maximal independent set by, at each step, choosing the minimum degree vertex in the graph and removing its neighbors, achieves an approximation ratio of (Δ+2)/3 on graphs with maximum degree Δ. Approximation hardness bounds for such instances were proven in Berman & Karpinski (1999). Indeed, even Max Independent Set on 3-regular 3-edge-colorable graphs is APX-complete.
Independent sets in interval intersection graphs
An interval graph is a graph in which the nodes are 1-dimensional intervals (e.g. time intervals) and there is an edge between two intervals iff they intersect. An independent set in an interval graph is just a set of non-overlapping intervals. The problem of finding maximum independent sets in interval graphs has been studied, for example, in the context of job scheduling: given a set of jobs that has to be executed on a computer, find a maximum set of jobs that can be executed without interfering with each other. This problem can be solved exactly in polynomial time using earliest deadline first scheduling.
Independent sets in geometric intersection graphs
A geometric intersection graph is a graph in which the nodes are geometric shapes and there is an edge between two shapes iff they intersect. An independent set in a geometric intersection graph is just a set of disjoint (non-overlapping) shapes. The problem of finding maximum independent sets in geometric intersection graphs has been studied, for example, in the context of Automatic label placement: given a set of locations in a map, find a maximum set of disjoint rectangular labels near these locations.
Finding a maximum independent set in intersection graphs is still NP-complete, but it is easier to approximate than the general maximum independent set problem. A recent survey can be found in the introduction of Chan & Har-Peled (2012).
Finding maximal independent sets
Software for searching maximum independent set
|Name||License||API language||Brief info|
|igraph||GPL||C, Python, R, Ruby||exact solution. "The current implementation was ported to igraph from the Very Nauty Graph Library by Keith Briggs and uses the algorithm from the paper S. Tsukiyama, M. Ide, H. Ariyoshi and I. Shirawaka. A new algorithm for generating all the maximal independent sets. SIAM J Computing, 6:505--517, 1977".|
|NetworkX||BSD||Python||approximate solution, see the routine maximum_independent_set|
|OpenOpt||BSD||Python||exact and approximate solutions, possibility to specify nodes that have to be
included / excluded; see STAB class for more details and examples
- An independent set of edges is a set of edges of which no two have a vertex in common. It is usually called a matching.
- A vertex coloring is a partition of the vertex set into independent sets.
- Korshunov (1974)
- Godsil & Royle (2001), p. 3.
- PROOF: A set V of vertices is an independent set IFF every edge in the graph is adjacent to at most one member of V IFF every edge in the graph is adjacent to at least one member not in V IFF the complement of V is a vertex cover.
- Moon & Moser (1965).
- Füredi (1987).
- Chiba & Nishizeki (1985).
- Berman & Fujito (1995).
- Bourgeois et al. (2010)
- Fomin, Grandoni & Kratsch (2009)
- Minty (1980),Sbihi (1980),Nakamura & Tamura (2001),Faenza, Oriolo & Stauffer (2014),Nobili & Sassano (2015)
- Lokshtanov, Vatshelle & Villanger (2014)
- Grötschel, Lovász & Schrijver (1988)
- Frank (1976)
- Tarjan (1985)
- Bazgan, Cristina; Escoffier, Bruno; Paschos, Vangelis Th. (2005). "Completeness in standard and differential approximation classes: Poly-(D)APX- and (D)PTAS-completeness". Theoretical Computer Science 339 (2–3): 272–292. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2005.03.007.
- Baker (1994); Grohe (2003).
- Halldórsson & Radhakrishnan (1997).
- Chlebík, Miroslav; Chlebíková, Janka (2003). "Approximation Hardness for Small Occurrence Instances of NP-Hard Problems". Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Algorithms and Complexity.
- Luby (1986).
- Baker, Brenda S. (1994), "Approximation algorithms for NP-complete problems on planar graphs", Journal of the ACM 41 (1): 153–180, doi:10.1145/174644.174650.
- Berman, Piotr; Fujito, Toshihiro (1995), "On approximation properties of the Independent set problem for degree 3 graphs", Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 955, Springer-Verlag, pp. 449–460, doi:10.1007/3-540-60220-8_84, ISBN 978-3-540-60220-0.
- Berman, Piotr; Karpinski, Marek (1999), "On some tighter inapproximability results", Automata, Languages and Programming, 26th International Colloquium, ICALP'99 Prague, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1644, Prague: Springer-Verlag, pp. 200–209, doi:10.1007/3-540-48523-6, ISBN 978-3-540-66224-2
- Bourgeois, Nicolas; Escoffier, Bruno; Paschos, Vangelis Th.; van Rooij, Johan M. M. (2010), "Algorithm theory—SWAT 2010", Algorithm Theory - SWAT 2010, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Berlin: Springer) 6139: 62–73, Bibcode:2010LNCS.6139...62B, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13731-0_7, ISBN 978-3-642-13730-3, MR 2678485
- Chan, T. M. (2003), "Polynomial-time approximation schemes for packing and piercing fat objects", Journal of Algorithms 46 (2): 178–189, doi:10.1016/s0196-6774(02)00294-8.
- Chan, T. M.; Har-Peled, S. (2012), "Approximation algorithms for maximum independent set of pseudo-disks", Discrete & Computational Geometry 48 (2): 373, doi:10.1007/s00454-012-9417-5.
- Chiba, N.; Nishizeki, T. (1985), "Arboricity and subgraph listing algorithms", SIAM Journal on Computing 14 (1): 210–223, doi:10.1137/0214017.
- Erlebach, T.; Jansen, K.; Seidel, E. (2005), "Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes for Geometric Intersection Graphs", SIAM Journal on Computing 34 (6): 1302, doi:10.1137/s0097539702402676.
- Faenza, Y.; Oriolo, G.; Stauffer, G. (2014), "Solving the Weighted Stable Set Problem in Claw-Free Graphs", Journal of the ACM 61 (4): 1–41.
- Fomin, Fedor V.; Grandoni, Fabrizio; Kratsch, Dieter (2009), "A measure & conquer approach for the analysis of exact algorithms", Journal of ACM 56 (5): 1–32, doi:10.1145/1552285.1552286, article no. 25.
- Frank, Andras (1976), "Some polynomial algorithms for certain graphs and hypergraphs", Congressus Numerantium XV: 211–226.
- Füredi, Z. (1987), "The number of maximal independent sets in connected graphs", Journal of Graph Theory 11 (4): 463–470, doi:10.1002/jgt.3190110403.
- Godsil, Chris; Royle, Gordon (2001), Algebraic Graph Theory, New York: Springer, ISBN 0-387-95220-9.
- Grohe, Martin (2003), "Local tree-width, excluded minors, and approximation algorithms", Combinatorica 23 (4): 613–632, doi:10.1007/s00493-003-0037-9.
- Grötschel, M.; Lovász, L.; Schrijver, A. (1988), "9.4 Coloring Perfect Graphs", Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization, Algorithms and Combinatorics 2, Springer–Verlag, pp. 296–298, ISBN 0-387-13624-X.
- Halldórsson, M. M.; Radhakrishnan, J. (1997), "Greed is good: Approximating independent sets in sparse and bounded-degree graphs", Algorithmica 18 (1): 145–163, doi:10.1007/BF02523693.
- Korshunov, A.D. (1974), "Coefficient of Internal Stability", Kibernetika (in Ukrainian) 10 (1): 17–28, doi:10.1007/BF01069014.
- Lokshtanov, D.; Vatshelle, M.; Villanger, Y. (2014), "Independent sets in P5-free graphs in polynomial time", SODA (Symposium on Discrete Algorithms): 570–581.
- Luby, Michael (1986), "A simple parallel algorithm for the maximal independent set problem", SIAM Journal on Computing 15 (4): 1036–1053, doi:10.1137/0215074, MR 861369.
- Minty, G.J. (1980), "On maximal independent sets of vertices in claw-free graphs", Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B 28: 284–304.
- Moon, J.W.; Moser, Leo (1965), "On cliques in graphs", Israel Journal of Mathematics 3 (1): 23–28, doi:10.1007/BF02760024, MR 0182577.
- Nakamura, D.; Tamura, A. (2001), "A revision of Minty's algorithm for finding a maximum weight stable set in a claw-free graph", Journal of Operations Research Society Japan 44: 194–204.
- Nobili, P.; Sassano, A. (2015), An O(n^2 log n) algorithm for the weighted stable set problem in claw-free graphs, arXiv:1501.05775 [cs.DM]
- Robson, J. M. (1986), "Algorithms for maximum independent sets", Journal of Algorithms 7 (3): 425–440, doi:10.1016/0196-6774(86)90032-5.
- Sbihi, Najiba (1980), "Algorithme de recherche d'un stable de cardinalité maximum dans un graphe sans étoile", Discrete Mathematics (in French) 29 (1): 53–76, doi:10.1016/0012-365X(90)90287-R, MR 553650.
- Tarjan, R.E. (1985), "Decomposition by clique separators", Discrete Mathematics 55: 221–232.