Informetrics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Infometrics)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Informetrics is the study of quantitative aspects of information,[1] it is an extension and evolution of traditional bibliometrics and scientometrics. Informetrics uses bibliometrics and scientometrics methods to study mainly the problems of literature information management and evaluation of science and technology.[2] Informetrics is an independent discipline that uses quantitative methods from mathematics and statistics to study the process, phenomena, and law of informetrics.[3] Informetrics has gained more attention as it is a common scientific method for academic evaluation, research hotspots in discipline, and trend analysis.

Informetrics includes the production, dissemination, and use of all forms of information, regardless of its form or origin. Informetrics encompasses the following fields:[4][5]

  • Scientometrics, which studies quantitative aspects of science
  • Webometrics, which studies quantitative aspects of the World Wide Web
  • Bibliometrics, which studies quantitative aspects of recorded information
  • The relationship between the metrics terms
    Cybermetrics, which is similar to webometrics, but broadens its definition to include electronic resources

Origin and Development[edit]

The term informetrics (French: Informetrie) was coined by German scholars Otto Nacke in 1979,[6][7] and came from the German word 'informetrie’. The corresponding English terminology soon appeared in the subsequent literature.

In September 1980, Professor Otto Nacke introduced the term 'informetrics' at the first seminar on Informetrics in Frankfurt, Germany.[8] Later, Committee on Informetrics has established through The International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID).[9]

In 1987, informetrics started to be officially recognized by the international information community and several foreign information scientists.[2]

In 1988, at First International Conference on Bibliometrics and Theoretical Aspects of Information Retrieval, Brooks suggested bibliometrics and scientometrics can be included in the field of informetrics.[10]

In 1990, Leo Egghe and Ronald Rousseau proposed the formation of the discipline of informetrics: statistical bibliography (1923) to bibliometrics and scientometrics (1969) and then to informetrics (1979).[11]

In 1993, the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI) was founded at the International Conference on Bibliometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics in Berlin, and the first one was held in Belgium and organized by Leo Egghe and Ronald Rousseau.[12] The society was formally incorporated in 1994 in the Netherlands[12] and plays a significant role in the development of informetrics.

The ISSI aims to promote the "exchange and communication of professional information in the fields of scientometrics and informetrics, including improve standards, theory and practice, as well as promote research, education and training".[12] In addition, to "engage in relevant public conversation and policy discussions".[12]

In the western world, 20th century's Informetrics is mostly based on Lotka's law, named after Alfred J. Lotka, Zipf's law, named after George Kingsley Zipf, Bradford's law named after Samuel C. Bradford and on the work of Derek J. de Solla Price, Gerard Salton, Leo Egghe, Ronald Rousseau, Tibor Braun, Olle Persson, Peter Ingwersen, Manfred Bonitz, and Eugene Garfield.[13][14][15]

Difference Between Informetrics, Bibliometrics and Scientometrics[edit]

Three metrics terms overlap with each other

Since the 1960s, three similar terms have emerged in the fields of library science, philology and science of science, they are bibliometrics, scientometrics and informetrics, representing three very similar quantitative sub-disciplines.[citation needed] The three metrics terms can be confusing and often misused. Informetrics and bibliometrics interpenetrate each other but have different aspects in research object, research scope, and measuring unit. Informetrics and scientometrics are very different in their research purpose and research object, as well as the research scope and application.

Bibliometrics is categorised under the field of library science, it uses mathematical and statistical methods to describe, evaluate, and predict the current status and trends of science and technology. Also to study the "distribution structure, quantitative relationship, change law and quantitative management of literature information, quantitative relationships, patterns and quantitative management of literature and information".[16] The term was first used by Alan Pritchard in 1969 in his paper Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics?.[17]

Scientometrics is a branch of science that quantitatively evaluates and predicts the process and management of scientific activities in order to reveal their development patterns and trends.[citation needed] The definition of scientometrics was described by Derek De Solla Price in his book Science to Science [18] as the “quantitative study of science, communication in science, and science policy”.[19]

Links between the three metrics terms[edit]

The most prominent connection between the three metrics terms is in their research objects. Since all three disciplines use literature information as their research object, therefore, they have some similarities and overlaps in their research methods and fields. Moreover, they all use mathematical methods as the basic research methods and they all apply the three fundamental laws, Bradford's law, Lotka's law and Zipf's law.[20][21]

Distinctions between the three metrics terms[edit]

The distinction between the three metrics terms can tell from their research object and research purpose. The research of bibliometrics focuses on the analysis of "scientific output in the form of articles, publications, citations, and others".[22] Scientometrics is to measure the basic characteristics and laws of scientific activities.[23] Where informetrics is to investigate information sources and information distribution process.[24]

Concept and System Structure[edit]

Purpose of Informetrics Research[edit]

Subject structure of informetrics

The main purpose of informetrics is to use its theocratical research to solve the methodological issues in the research process, and to discover and reveal the basic laws of information distribution through the study of information process and phenomenon. In this way, makes information management more scientific and provides a quantitative basis for information services and information management decisions.

For informetrics, it is necessary to bring quantitative analysis methods to further reveal the structure of information units and the "quantitative change law of literature information”.[2] Further to this, to improve the scientific accuracy of information science from a theoretical point of view. At the same time, to better solve the basic contradictions in the information service, overcome the information crisis, and make the information management work more effective to serve science and technology, economic and social development.

Quantitative analysis of bibliographic data was pioneered by Robert K. Merton in an article called Science, Technology, and Society in Seventeenth Century England and originally published by Merton in 1938.[25]

The Significance of Informetrics Research[edit]

The significance of informetrics research is to summarize various empirical laws from the theoretical point of view, at the same time test and modify the various empirical laws in the new information unit conditions, and explore its new applicability, therefore, the scientific nature of information science can be improved, but also to provide theoretical guidance for practical work.

The Objects of Informetrics Research[edit]

The object of informetrics is broader than the field of bibliometrics and scientometrics, including "messages, data, events, objects, text, and documents”.[2] Informetrics is often used to inform policies and decisions across a broad range of fields, such as economy, politics, technology and social spheres that "influence the flow and use patterns of information".[26] Tague-Sutcliffe describes the following uses of informetrics:[27]

  • Citation analysis;
  • Characteristics of authors;
  • Use of recorded information;
  • Obsolescence of the literature;
  • Concomitant growth of new concepts;
  • Characteristics of publication sources;
  • Definition and measurement o information;
  • Growth of subject literature, databases, libraries;
  • Types and characteristics of retrieval performance measures;
  • Statistical aspects of language, word, and phrase frequencies.

Basic Laws[edit]

In the field of informetrics research, there are many outstanding contributors in the discipline with a solid knowledge of quantitative research methods. In the early 20th century, several scientists contributed empirical applications that have become the three fundamental laws of informetrics, Bradford's law, Lotka's law, and Zipf's law, which promote the development of informetrics.[3]

Bradford's Law[edit]

The British documentalist and librarian Samuel C. Bradford first discovered the law of concentration and scattering of literature, and in 1934, it has been described as Bradford's law of scattering. It reveals the law of concentration and scattering of scientific papers in journals in a quantitative way, which is the most basic law and an important part of bibliometrics, as well as informetrics and its research still has important irreplaceable theoretical value and practical significance. Bradford found a pattern in the distribution of disciplinary literature among journals, papers from one discipline often appear in journals of another discipline. Eventually, there is a pattern for a large number of papers in a given discipline to be concentrated in a certain number of journals, while the others are scattered in a large number of other related journals. He ranked journals by the number of papers published in a particular discipline, "in their descending order of productivity",[28] then can dividing articles into three different zones, first is the nuclear zone with high productivity; "the second zone moderately productive zone; and the third as the low productive zone".[28] In summary, Bradford's law described the relationship between the number of journals and papers.

Lotka's Law[edit]

Lotka's law is an empirical law describing the productivity of science, also known as the inverse square law, pioneered by the American statistician Alfred J. Lotka in 1926. It reveals scientific productivity and the quantitative relationship between authors and papers.[29] Lotka's law is mainly used to predict the number of authors and papers in a specific discipline, to grasp the trend of the growth of literature, thus, facilitating scientific management of literature information.

Zipf's Law[edit]

Zipf's law is proposed by linguist George Kingsley Zipf in 1949, it is obtained from the statistics of natural language vocabulary.[2] It is a summary of the "literature vocabulary frequency distribution rule".[2] The frequency of different words has a certain statistical regularity. Zipf's law has significant use in the fields of library information, information resources management, science and technology management.[2]

Informetrics Education in Library and Information Science (LIS)[edit]

Informetrics course is usually offered to undergraduate and post-graduate students. Only a few Universities offer informetrics as an independent course, such as China, Germany and Japan, most Universities include informetrics in the department of library and information science

.[30] In fact, many challenges and the need for improvements have been shown in informetrics education across the world. Constant examination and adjustment in Informetrics education are needed as the rapid evolvement of information technologies in the field of LIS, for example, the emergence of webometrics/cybermetrics.[30] On the other hand, technological development has become a challenge that affects the learning environment of informetrics education, for example, the shortage of research expertise in the informetrics field, and the insufficient skills of research specialists and data collection tools.[31][32] Moreover, most countries have limited resources in informetrics education, as some Universities only offer the course if there is a demand among students.[33]

Although many countries do not offer informetrics education, it is still important and necessary to maintain and continue further development in the field of informetrics as it is useful in science policy and management, as well as plays an essential role in the domain of research evaluation.[30] Informetrics education can provide an in-depth understanding of "information user communities and the boundaries of specific fields".[30] As science and technology are continuously innovating and developing, using the methods and applications of informetrics allows for "research monitoring and evaluation purpose in an objective way".[30] Moreover, informetrics research is benefited almost all scientific fields,[3] as it is multidisciplinary.

Future Development[edit]

With the advent of digitalization and the development of technologies, virtual libraries and online journals have become the main way for researchers and scholars to access scientific literature information, which has made the measurement and evaluation of web-based literature information more important. Webometrics/cybermetrics is the expansion of informetrics and bibliometrics, that has great theoretical significance and broad application prospects.[citation needed] Network and information are the relationships of inheritance and development, hence, webometrics/cybermetrics as a new sub-discipline under the field of informetrics has rapidly developed to adapt to the network environment.

Webometrics/cybermetrics is a discipline in science that integrates bibliometrics, informetrics, statistical methods, and computer technology to measure and analyze information and documents on the web,[34] which covers "quantitative aspects of both the construction side and the usage side of the Web".[35] The concept of webometrics was introduced in 1997 by T.C. Almind and P. Ingwersen [36] and became a research hotspot in 1999. In 2000, scientists began to explore the disciplinary system and theoretical framework of webometrics and conducted meaningful application research. Its research areas include link analysis, search engines and web citation analysis.[37]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Wolfram, D. (2003). Applied Informetrics for Information Retrieval Research. Libraries Unlimited. ISBN 9780313319709.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Qiu, Junping; Zhao, Rongying; Yang, Siluo; Dong, Ke (2017). Informetrics. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-4032-0. ISBN 978-981-10-4031-3.
  3. ^ a b c Galyavieva, M. S. (April 2013). "On the formation of the concept of informetrics (Review)". Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 40 (2): 89–96. doi:10.3103/S014768821302007X. ISSN 0147-6882. S2CID 17097560.
  4. ^ Tague-Sutcliffe, Jean (1992). "An Introduction to Informetrics". Information Processing and Management. 28 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(92)90087-G.
  5. ^ Wilson, Concepción S. (1999). "Informetrics". Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Medford, NJ: Information Today. 34: 107–247.
  6. ^ Nacke, O. (1979). "Informetrie: eine neuer Name für eine neue Disziplin". Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 30 (6): 219–226.
  7. ^ Bar-Ilan, Judit (2008). "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century: A review". Journal of Informetrics. 2 (1): 1–52. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001.
  8. ^ Sengupta, I. N. (1992). "Bibliometrics, Informetrics, Scientometrics and Librametrics: An Overview". Libri. 42 (2). doi:10.1515/libr.1992.42.2.75. ISSN 0024-2667. S2CID 143826699.
  9. ^ Tague-Sutcliffe, Jean (January 1992). "An introduction to informetrics". Information Processing & Management. 28 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(92)90087-G.
  10. ^ Brookes, B.C. (1990). "Biblio-, sciento-, infor-metrics??? What are we talking about?". In L. Egghe and R. Rousseau (Eds.). Inforrnefrics 89/90, 31-43.
  11. ^ Nicholls, Paul (January 1991). "Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science". Information Processing & Management. 27 (5): 592. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(91)90073-U.
  12. ^ a b c d International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics website (2018). "About the society".
  13. ^ Tabah, Albert (1996). Information Epidemics and the Growth of Physics (Thesis).
  14. ^ Egghe, Leo; Rousseau, Ronald (1990). Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation, and Information Science. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-444-88493-0.
  15. ^ Braam, Robert R. (1991). Mapping of science: Foci of intellectual interest in scientific literature. DSWO Press. ISBN 90-6695-049-8.
  16. ^ Tian, Hua; Chen, Jie (January 2022). "A bibliometric analysis on global eHealth". Digital Health. 8: 205520762210913. doi:10.1177/20552076221091352. ISSN 2055-2076. PMC 9006363. PMID 35433016.
  17. ^ Pritchard, Alan (1969). "Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics?". Journal of Documentation. 25: 348–349.
  18. ^ Danesh, Farshid; Mardani-Nejad, Ali (2020-12-07). 1.4 Derek De Solla Price: The Father of Scientometrics. De Gruyter Saur. doi:10.1515/9783110646610-006. ISBN 978-3-11-064661-0. S2CID 235871925.
  19. ^ Moore, Kelly; Hess, David J. (May 1999). "Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction". Contemporary Sociology. 28 (3): 315. doi:10.2307/2654168. ISSN 0094-3061. JSTOR 2654168.
  20. ^ Shelton, R. D. (2020-02-22). "Scientometric laws connecting publication counts to national research funding". Scientometrics. 123 (1): 181–206. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03392-x. ISSN 0138-9130. S2CID 211234771.
  21. ^ Bailón-Moreno, R.; Jurado-Alameda, E.; Ruiz-Baños, R.; Courtial, J. P. (April 2005). "Bibliometric laws: Empirical flaws of fit". Scientometrics. 63 (2): 209–229. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0211-5. ISSN 0138-9130. S2CID 16762648.
  22. ^ "OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers". www.oecd-ilibrary.org. 2022. doi:10.1787/18151965. Retrieved 2022-05-28.
  23. ^ Hossain, Saddam; Batcha, M. Sadik (2021-10-02). "A Scientometric Analysis and Visualization on Beta Thalassemia Research at Global Perspectives". Journal of Hospital Librarianship. 21 (4): 391–404. doi:10.1080/15323269.2021.1982261. ISSN 1532-3269. S2CID 244575953.
  24. ^ Bawden, David; Robinson, Lyn (2015-06-10). Introduction to Information Science (1 ed.). Facet. doi:10.29085/9781783300761.015. ISBN 978-1-78330-076-1.
  25. ^ Merton, Robert K. Studies on the History and Philosophy of Science, and on the History of Learning and Culture. Bruges, The St. Catherine Press, Ltd., 1938, Osiris, IV, 2, 360-632.(Extended edition, Humanities Press, 1970. Reprinted 1978. Reissued: Howard Fertig, 2001)
  26. ^ Maluleka, Jan R.; Onyancha, Omwoyo B. (2017-02-17). "RESEARCH COLLABORATION AMONG LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE SCHOOLS IN SOUTH AFRICA (1991â€"2012): AN INFORMETRICS STUDY". Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies. 34 (3): 36–59. doi:10.25159/0027-2639/1082. ISSN 2663-659X.
  27. ^ Almind, Tomas C.; Ingwersen, Peter (1997-10-01). "Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to 'webometrics'". Journal of Documentation. 53 (4): 404–426. doi:10.1108/eum0000000007205. ISSN 0022-0418.
  28. ^ a b Wardikar, Vijay (2013-12-15). "Application of Bradford's Law of Scattering to the Literature of Library & Information Science: A Study of Doctoral Theses Citations Submitted to the Universities of Maharashtra, India". Library Philosophy and Practice (E-journal).
  29. ^ B, Mini (2013-09-06). "LOKTA'S LAW REVISITED IN TOXICOLOGY LITERATURE". Library Philosophy and Practice (E-journal).
  30. ^ a b c d e Zungu, Nkosingiphile (2020-10-11). "Informetrics Education in Library and Information Science (LIS) Academic Department in South Africa". Library Philosophy and Practice (E-journal).
  31. ^ Ajiferuke, Isola (2011-01-10). "How to overcome some of the challenges that African scholars are facing in conducting informetrics research". South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science. 77 (2). doi:10.7553/77-2-59. ISSN 2304-8263.
  32. ^ Wormell, Irene (1998). Informetrics:an emerging sub-discipline in information science. OCLC 854801244.
  33. ^ Sun, Y., Nishizawa, M. & Markscheffel, B. (2016). “Education in informetrics: A case study for Japan. In Proc. of the 13th Int”, Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics, and Scientometrics (WIS) and the 18th COLLNET Meeting 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318394574_Education_in_Informetrics_A_Case_Study_for_Japan.
  34. ^ Thelwall, Michael (January 2009). "Introduction to Webometrics: Quantitative Web Research for the Social Sciences". Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services. 1 (1): 1–116. doi:10.2200/S00176ED1V01Y200903ICR004. ISSN 1947-945X.
  35. ^ Björneborn, Lennart; Ingwersen, Peter (2004). "Toward a basic framework for webometrics". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55 (14): 1216–1227. doi:10.1002/asi.20077. ISSN 1532-2882.
  36. ^ Udartseva, O. M. (July 2018). "An Overview of Webometrics in Libraries: History and Modern Development Tendencies". Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 45 (3): 174–181. doi:10.3103/S0147688218030115. ISSN 0147-6882. S2CID 53207645.
  37. ^ P Chellappandi; C S Vijayakumar (2018-12-31). "Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Webometrics/ Cybermetrics, Informetrics and Altmetrics - An Emerging Field in Library and Information Science Research". Shanlax International Journal of Education. 7 (1): 5–8. doi:10.5281/ZENODO.2529398.

External links[edit]