Information governance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Information governance, or IG, is the set of multi-disciplinary structures, policies, procedures, processes and controls implemented to manage information at an enterprise level, supporting an organization's immediate and future regulatory, legal, risk, environmental and operational requirements. Information governance should determine the balance point between two potentially divergent organizational goals: extracting value from information and reducing the potential risk of information. Information governance reduces organizational risk in the fields of compliance, operational transparency, and reducing expenditures associated with e-discovery and litigation response. An organization can establish a consistent and logical framework for employees to handle data through their information governance policies and procedures. These policies guide proper behavior regarding how organizations and their employees handle electronically stored information (ESI).[1][2]

Information governance encompasses more than traditional records management. It incorporates information security and protection, compliance, data governance, electronic discovery, risk management, privacy, data storage and archiving, knowledge management, business operations and management, audit, analytics, IT management, master data management, enterprise architecture, business intelligence, big data, data science, and finance.[3]


Records management[edit]

Records management deals with the creation, retention and storage and disposition of records. A record can either be a physical, tangible object, or digital information such as a database, application data, and e-mail. The lifecycle was historically viewed as the point of creation to the eventual disposal of a record. As data generation exploded in recent decades, and regulations and compliance issues increased, traditional records management failed to keep pace. A more comprehensive platform for managing records and information became necessary to address all phases of the lifecycle, which led to the advent of information governance.[4]

In 2003 the Department of Health in England introduced the concept of broad-based information governance into the National Health Service, publishing version 1 of an online performance assessment tool with supporting guidance. The NHS IG Toolkit[5] is now used by over 30,000 NHS and partner organisations, supported by an e-learning platform with some 650,000 users.

In 2008, ARMA International introduced the Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles®, or "The Principles"[6] and the subsequent "The Principles" Information Governance Maturity Model.[7] "The Principles" identify the critical hallmarks of information governance. As such, they apply to all sizes of organizations, in all types of industries, and in both the private and public sectors. Multi-national organizations can also use "The Principles" to establish consistent practices across a variety of business units. ARMA International recognized that a clear statement of "Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles®" ("The Principles") would guide:

  • CEOs in determining how to protect their organizations in the use of information assets;
  • Legislators in crafting legislation meant to hold organizations accountable; and
  • Records management professionals in designing comprehensive and effective records management programs.

Information governance goes beyond retention and disposition to include privacy, access controls, and other compliance issues. In electronic discovery, or e-discovery, relevant data in the form of electronically stored information is searched for by attorneys and placed on legal hold. IG includes consideration of how this data is held and controlled for e-discovery, and also provides a platform for defensible disposition and compliance. Additionally, metadata often accompanies electronically stored data and can be of great value to the enterprise if stored and managed correctly.

With all of these additional considerations that go beyond traditional records management, IG emerged as a platform for organizations to define policies at the enterprise level, across multiple jurisdictions. IG then also provides for the enforcement of these policies into the various repositories of information, data, and records.

A coalition of organizations known as Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM), which was founded in 2005 to address issues related to electronic discovery and information governance, subsequently developed, as one of its projects, a resource called the Information Governance Reference Model (IGRM).[8] In 2011, EDRM, in collaboration with ARMA International, published a white paper that describes How the Information Governance Reference Model (IGRM) Complements ARMA International’s Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles ("The Principles")[9] The IGRM illustrates the relationship between key stakeholders and the Information Lifecycle and highlights the transparency required to enable effective governance IGRM v3.0 Update: Privacy & Security Officers As Stakeholders.[10]

Universities and professional associations started to develop information governance training and education programmes. In 2010, Dr Elizabeth Lomas (who had been aligning RM with information security, assurance and risk management models throughout the 2000s) authored distance learning materials for Information Governance modules delivered internationally through Northumbria University. ARMA subsequently started to deliver an Information Governance certification. These initiatives have now been picked up by other Universities, e.g. San Jose State University offers a graduate certificate in information governance, information assurance, and cyber security, and has also incorporated a required course in information governance as part of their 100% online Master of Archives and Records Administration[11] (MARA) degree program.

In 2014, John Wiley & Sons published the first textbook on information governance, "Information Governance: Concepts, Strategies, and Best Practices"[12] by Robert Smallwood. Also in 2014, The Information Governance Conference,[13] an annual conference on information governance best practices began.

Organizational structure[edit]

In the past, records managers owned records management, perhaps within a compliance department at an enterprise. In order to address the broader issues surrounding records management, several other key stakeholders must be involved. Legal, IT, and Compliance tend to be the departments that touch information governance the most, though certainly other departments might seek representation. Many enterprises create information governance committees to ensure that all necessary constituents are represented and that all relevant issues are addressed.[14]


To address retention and disposition, Records Management and Enterprise Content Management applications were developed. Sometimes detached search engines or homegrown policy definition tools were created. These were often employed at a departmental or divisional level; rarely were tools used across the enterprise. While these tools were used to define policies, they lacked the ability to enforce those policies. Monitoring for compliance with policies was increasingly challenging. Since information governance addresses so much more than traditional records management, several software solutions have emerged to include the vast array of issues facing records managers.

Other available tools include:

  • ARMA International Next Level Information Governance Assessment ( Based upon the Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles)
  • ARMA Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles[15]
  • EDRM Information Governance Reference Model[16]
  • Information Coalition Information Governance Model[17]
  • NHS Information Governance Toolkit[18]

Laws and regulations[edit]

Key to IG are the regulations and laws that help to define corporate policies. Some of these regulations include:


See also[edit]


  1. ^ "What is Information Governance? And Why is it So Hard? - Debra Logan". 11 January 2010. 
  2. ^ [Kooper, M., Maes, R., and Roos Lindgreen, E. (2011). On the governance of information: Introducing a new concept of governance to support the management of information. International Journal of Information Management, 31(3), 195-200]
  3. ^ "IGI PUBLISHES 2014 ANNUAL REPORT - Information Governance Initiative". 11 August 2014. 
  4. ^
  5. ^ "Home". 
  6. ^ "Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles". 
  7. ^
  8. ^ EDRM. "About EDRM". Retrieved 2015-01-21. 
  9. ^ White Paper (2011). Ledergerber, Marcus, ed. How the Information Governance Reference Model (IGRM)Complements ARMA International’s Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles (PDF). EDRM and ARMA International. p. 15. 
  10. ^ IGRM v3.0 Update: Privacy & Security Officers As Stakeholders
  11. ^ [1]]
  12. ^ Information Governance: Concepts, Strategies, and Best Practices. John Wiley & Sons. April 2014. ISBN 978-1-118-21830-3. 
  13. ^ Information Governance Conference
  14. ^ "From the Experts: Information Governance and Its Impact on Litigation". 
  15. ^ ARMA International, "The Principles", ARMA International
  16. ^ EDRM, "Information Governance Reference Model", EDRM
  17. ^ Information Coalition, "The Information Governance Model", Information Coalition
  18. ^ NHS, "NHS Information Governance Toolkit", NHS
  19. ^ "Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act". 
  20. ^ "Official PCI Security Standards Council Site - Verify PCI Compliance, Download Data Security and Credit Card Security Standards". 
  21. ^ "Health Information Privacy". 26 August 2015. 
  22. ^ "S.900 - Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act". 
  23. ^ "Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002" (PDF). 
  24. ^ "Home - MoReq2". 
  25. ^ "Account Suspended". 
  26. ^ "ISO 15489-1:2001 - Information and documentation -- Records management -- Part 1: General". 
  27. ^ "DoD Standard 5015.2". 

External links[edit]