Injection locking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Injection locking and injection pulling are the frequency effects that can occur when a harmonic oscillator is disturbed by a second oscillator operating at a nearby frequency. When the coupling is strong enough and the frequencies near enough, the second oscillator can capture the first oscillator, causing it to have essentially identical frequency as the second. This is injection locking. When the second oscillator merely disturbs the first but does not capture it, the effect is called injection pulling. Injection locking and pulling effects are observed in numerous types of physical systems, however the terms are most often associated with electronic oscillators or laser resonators.

Injection locking has been used in beneficial and clever ways in the design of early television sets and oscilloscopes, allowing the equipment to be synchronized to external signals at a relatively low cost. Injection locking has also been used in high performance frequency doubling circuits. However, injection locking and pulling, when unintended, can degrade the performance of phase-locked loops and RF integrated circuits.

Injection from grandfather clocks to lasers[edit]

Injection pulling and injection locking can be observed in numerous physical systems where pairs of oscillators are coupled together. Perhaps the first to document these effects was Christiaan Huygens, the inventor of the pendulum clock, who was surprised to note that two pendulum clocks which normally would keep slightly different time nonetheless became perfectly synchronized when hung from a common beam. Modern researchers have confirmed his suspicion that the pendulums were coupled by tiny back-and-forth vibrations in the wooden beam.[1] The two clocks became injection locked to a common frequency.

Cross coupled LC oscillator with output on top

In a modern-day voltage-controlled oscillator an injection-locking signal may override its low-frequency control voltage, resulting in loss of control. When intentionally employed, injection locking provides a means to significantly reduce power consumption and possibly reduce phase noise in comparison to other frequency synthesizer and PLL design techniques. In similar fashion, the frequency output of large lasers can be purified by injection locking them with high accuracy reference lasers (see injection seeder).

Injection-locked oscillator[edit]

An injection-locked oscillator (ILO) is usually based on cross-coupled LC oscillator. It has been employed for frequency division[2] or jitter reduction in PLL, with the input of pure sinusoidal waveform. It was employed in continuous mode clock and data recovery (CDR) or clock recovery to perform clock restoration from the aid of either preceding pulse generation circuit to convert non-return-to-zero (NRZ) data to pseudo-return-to-zero (PRZ) format[3] or nonideal retiming circuit residing at the transmitter side to couple the clock signal into the data.[4] In the late 2000s, the ILO was employed for a burst-mode clock-recovery scheme.[5]

The ability to injection-lock is an inherent property of all oscillators (electronic or otherwise). This capability can be fundamentally understood as the combined effect of the oscillator's periodicity with its autonomy. Specifically, consider a periodic injection (i.e., external disturbance) that advances or lags the oscillator's phase by some phase shift every oscillation cycle. Due to the oscillator's periodicity, this phase shift will be the same from cycle to cycle if the oscillator is injection-locked. Moreover, due to the oscillator's autonomy, each phase shift persists indefinitely. Combining these two effects produces a fixed phase shift per oscillation cycle, which results in a constant frequency shift over time. If the resultant, shifted oscillation frequency matches the injection frequency, the oscillator is said to be injection-locked. However, if the maximum frequency shift that the oscillator can experience due to the injection is not enough to cause the oscillation and injection frequencies to coincide (i.e., the injection frequency lies outside the lock range), the oscillator can only be injection pulled (see Injection pulling).[6]

Unwanted injection locking[edit]

High-speed logic signals and their harmonics are potential threats to an oscillator. The leakage of these and other high frequency signals into an oscillator through a substrate concomitant with an unintended lock is unwanted injection locking.

Gain by injection locking[edit]

Injection locking can also provide a means of gain at a low power cost in certain applications.

Injection pulling[edit]

Injection (aka frequency) pulling occurs when an interfering frequency source disturbs an oscillator but is unable to injection lock it. The frequency of the oscillator is pulled towards the frequency source as can be seen in the spectrogram. The failure to lock may be due to insufficient coupling, or because the injection source frequency lies outside the locking window (also known as the lock range) of the oscillator. Injection pulling fundamentally corrupts the inherent periodicity of an oscillator.

Spectrogram of the above audio

Entrainment[edit]

Entrainment has been used to refer to the process of mode locking of coupled driven oscillators, which is the process whereby two interacting oscillating systems, which have different periods when they function independently, assume a common period. The two oscillators may fall into synchrony, but other phase relationships are also possible. The system with the greater frequency slows down, and the other speeds up.

Dutch physicist Christiaan Huygens, the inventor of the pendulum clock, introduced the concept after he noticed, in 1666, that the pendulums of two clocks mounted on a common board had synchronized, and subsequent experiments duplicated this phenomenon. He described this effect as "odd sympathy". The two pendulum clocks synchronized with their pendulums swinging in opposite directions, 180° out of phase, but in-phase states can also result. Entrainment occurs because small amounts of energy are transferred between the two systems when they are out of phase in such a way as to produce negative feedback. As they assume a more stable phase relationship, the amount of energy gradually reduces to zero. In the realm of physics, Huygens' observations are related to resonance and the resonant coupling of harmonic oscillators, which also gives rise to sympathetic vibrations.

A 2002 study of Huygens' observations show that an antiphase stable oscillation was somewhat fortuitous, and that there are other possible stable solutions, including a "death state" where a clock stops running, depending on the strength of the coupling between the clocks.[7]

Mode locking between driven oscillators can be easily demonstrated using mechanical metronomes on a common, easily movable surface.[8][9] Such mode locking is important for many biological systems including the proper operation of pacemakers.[10]

The use of the word entrainment in the modern physics literature most often refers to the movement of one fluid, or collection of particulates, by another (see Entrainment (hydrodynamics)). The use of the word to refer to mode locking of non-linear coupled oscillators appears mostly after about 1980, and remains relatively rare in comparison.

A similar coupling phenomenon was characterized in hearing aids when the adaptive feedback cancellation is used. This chaotic artifact (entrainment) is observed when correlated input signals are presented to an adaptive feedback canceller.

In recent years, aperiodic entrainment has been identified as an alternative form of entrainment that is of interest in biological rhythms.[11][12][13]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ http://phys.org/news/2016-03-huygens-pendulum-synchronization.html - Researchers prove Huygens was right about pendulum synchronization
  2. ^ Tiebout, M. (2004). "A CMOS direct injection-locked oscillator topology as high-frequency low-power frequency divider". IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 39 (7): 1170–1174. Bibcode:2004IJSSC..39.1170T. doi:10.1109/jssc.2004.829937. ISSN 0018-9200.
  3. ^ De Matos, M.; Bégueret, J-B.; Lapuyade, H.; Belot, D.; Escotte, L.; Deval, Y. (2005). A 0.25 μm SiGe receiver front-end for 5GHz applications. SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Microwave and Optoelectronics. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). pp. 213–217. doi:10.1109/imoc.2005.1579980. ISBN 0-7803-9341-4.
  4. ^ Gabara, T. (1999). An 0.25μm CMOS injection locked 5.6Gb/s clock and data recovery cell. Symposium on Integrated Circuits and Systems Design. pp. 84–87. doi:10.1109/SBCCI.1999.802973.
  5. ^ Lee, J.; Liu, M. (2007). A 20Gb/s burst-mode CDR circuit using injection-locking technique. International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). pp. 46–47. doi:10.1109/ISSCC.2007.373580.
  6. ^ Hong, B.; Hajimiri, A. (2019). "A general theory of injection locking and pulling in electrical oscillators—Part I: Time-synchronous modeling and injection waveform design". IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 54 (8): 2109–2121. doi:10.1109/JSSC.2019.2908753.
  7. ^ Bennett, Matthew; Schatz, Michael F.; Rockwood, Heidi; Wiesenfeld, Kurt (2002-03-08). "Huygens's clocks". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. The Royal Society. 458 (2019): 563–579. Bibcode:2002RSPSA.458..563.. doi:10.1098/rspa.2001.0888. ISSN 1364-5021.
  8. ^ Pantaleone, James (2002). "Synchronization of metronomes". American Journal of Physics. American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT). 70 (10): 992–1000. Bibcode:2002AmJPh..70..992P. doi:10.1119/1.1501118. ISSN 0002-9505.
  9. ^ Watch the synchronization of 32 metronomes CBS News, 2013 Sept 10
  10. ^ Ermentrout, G. B.; Rinzel, J. (1984-01-01). "Beyond a pacemaker's entrainment limit: phase walk-through". American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. American Physiological Society. 246 (1): R102–R106. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.1984.246.1.r102. ISSN 0363-6119. PMID 6696096.
  11. ^ Mainen, Z.; Sejnowski, T. (1995-06-09). "Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons". Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 268 (5216): 1503–1506. Bibcode:1995Sci...268.1503M. doi:10.1126/science.7770778. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 7770778.
  12. ^ Mori, Toshio; Kai, Shoichi (2002-05-10). "Noise-Induced Entrainment and Stochastic Resonance in Human Brain Waves". Physical Review Letters. American Physical Society (APS). 88 (21): 218101. Bibcode:2002PhRvL..88u8101M. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.218101. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 12059504.
  13. ^ Butzin, Nicholas C.; Hochendoner, Philip; Ogle, Curtis T.; Hill, Paul; Mather, William H. (2015-11-12). "Marching along to an Offbeat Drum: Entrainment of Synthetic Gene Oscillators by a Noisy Stimulus". ACS Synthetic Biology. American Chemical Society (ACS). 5 (2): 146–153. doi:10.1021/acssynbio.5b00127. ISSN 2161-5063. PMID 26524465.

Further reading[edit]

* Wolaver, Dan H. 1991. Phase-Locked Loop Circuit Design, Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-662743-9, pages 95–105

  • Adler, Robert (June 1946). "A Study of Locking Phenomena in Oscillators". Proceedings of the IRE. 34 (6): 351–357. doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1946.229930.
  • Kurokawa, K. (October 1973). "Injection locking of microwave solid-state oscillators". Proceedings of the IEEE. 61 (10): 1386–1410. doi:10.1109/PROC.1973.9293.

* Lee, Thomas H. 2004. The Design of CMOS Radio-Frequency Integrated Circuits, Cambridge, ISBN 0-521-83539-9, pages 563–566

External links[edit]