Intermediate band photovoltaics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Intermediate band photovoltaics in solar cell research provides methods for exceeding the Shockley–Queisser limit on the efficiency of a cell. It introduces an intermediate band (IB) energy level in between the valence and conduction bands. Theoretically, introducing an IB allows two photons with energy less than the bandgap to excite an electron from the valence band to the conduction band. This increases the induced photocurrent and thereby efficiency.[1]

Limiting efficiencies[edit]

One band[edit]

Luque and Marti first derived a theoretical limit for an IB device with one midgap energy level using detailed balance.[1] They assumed no carriers were collected at the IB and that the device was under full concentration.[1] They found the maximum efficiency to be 63.2%, for a bandgap of 1.95eV with the IB 0.71eV from either the valence or conduction band.[1] Under one sun illumination the limiting efficiency is 47%.[2]

Infinite bands[edit]

Green and Brown expanded upon these results by deriving the theoretical efficiency limit for a device with infinite IBs.[3] By introducing more IB’s, even more of the incident spectrum can be utilized. After performing the detailed balance, they found the maximum efficiency to be 77.2%.[3] This efficiency is less than that of a multijunction cell with infinite junctions. This is because in multijunction cells, electrons are captured exactly after being excited to a higher energy state, while in an IB device, the electrons still need another energy transition to reach the conduction band and be collected.[3]

Current technology[edit]

IBs have theoretical potential to become high efficiency devices, but they are hard to make. Introducing an IB greatly increases non-radiative recombination mechanisms.[4] Additionally, IBs need to be partially filled to allow for carrier movement to and from the IB. This often requires donor carriers.[2] The three current methods of fabricating IB devices are described below.

Quantum dots[edit]

The first method is to introduce small, homogenous QD structures into a single junction device.[2] This creates an IB, which can be tuned by changing the shape and size of the QDs.[5] For an experimental device to show high efficiency potential, it must demonstrate that it can generate current from the absorption of sub-bandgap photons, while preserving the output voltage of the device.[5] Using quantum dots, some experimental devices, such as InAs/GaAs, have been able to do this.[5] InAs/GaAs devices have been able to produce efficiencies as high as 18.3%, although this is still lower than the comparable single junction device.[6] Unfortunately, QD structures have several issues:[2]

  1. The introduced IB is often empty, requiring donor carriers to partially fill it.
  2. The devices are typically only effective at low temperatures as they are prone to thermal escape.
  3. The use of QDs increases non-radiative recombination, which decreases sub-bandgap performance.
  4. Increasing the amount of QD layers can improve sub-bandgap performance, but also increases the lattice strain on the device.

Therefore, more research is needed to fabricate truly high efficient devices. Specifically, high-density QD structures with long carrier lifetimes need to be developed and new materials need to be found to eliminate the need to use donor carriers to fill the IB.[2]

Highly mismatched alloys[edit]

Another method of fabricating an IB device is to use highly mismatched alloys. The use of these mismatched alloys introduces an IB due to the band anti-crossing (BAC) mechanism.[7] This is essentially the splitting of the valence or conduction band, depending on the alloy type, into two bands.[7] These materials are typically made of III-V alloys, however they have also been fabricated with II-VI alloys.[7] The two most studied alloys are ZnTe doped with O and GaAs doped with N.[8] Both of these devices have experimentally shown the absorption of sub-bandgap photons, however neither has been able to demonstrate voltage preservation.[8] Despite this, ZnTeO devices have demonstrated a higher photocurrent and efficiency than a comparable single bandgap ZnTe device.[6] Unfortunately, both structures exhibit efficiency less than 1%.[6] Moving forward, more research is needed to find materials with natural partially filled IB bands.[5]

Bulk materials with deep level impurities[edit]

Finally, the last approach is to introduce deep level impurities (DLI) into a semiconductor bulk material.[5] This method is similar to highly mismatched alloys, however the doping percentages are much less. The biggest issue with these devices is that the non-radiative recombination, predominantly Shockley-Read-Hall, significantly increases.[9] Significant research in this field was aimed at achieving “lifetime recovery”, or the ability to increase carrier lifetime by introducing more DLIs.[10] In particular, it was believed that lifetime recovery could be achieved by increasing the DLI concentrations to the insulator to metal transition.[10] Krich, however, disproved this and in the process proposed a “figure of merit” to determine if materials would be suitable for high efficiency IB’s.[10] The idea was that if the non-radiative recombination lifetime was significantly higher than the transit time for an electron to move from the conduction band to the IB, then the material could increase efficiency.[10] Essentially, the electron could reach the IB before recombining, leading to a higher induced photocurrent. This figure of merit has been used to explain why no usable device has been fabricated using highly doped silicon. Chalcogen doped silicon, in particular, have low figures of merit due to their small non-radiative recombination lifetimes.[11] To achieve IB devices, more research needs to be done to find a bulk semiconductor material that exhibits higher non-radiative recombination lifetimes.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d Luque, Antonio, and Antonio Martí. "Increasing the Efficiency of Ideal Solar Cells by Photon Induced Transitions at Intermediate Levels." Physical Review Letters 78.26 (1997): 5014-017. Web.
  2. ^ a b c d e Okada, Yoshitaka, Tomah Sogabe, and Yasushi Shoji. "Chapter 13: "Intermediate Band Solar Cells"" Advanced Concepts in Photovoltaics. Ed. Arthur J. Nozik, Gavin Conibeer, and Matthew C. Beard. Vol. No. 11. Cambridge, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2014. 425-54. Print. RSC Energy and Environment Ser.
  3. ^ a b c Brown, Andrew S., and Martin A. Green. "Impurity Photovoltaic Effect: Fundamental Energy Conversion Efficiency Limits." Journal of Applied Physics 92.3 (2002): 1329. Web.
  4. ^ Sullivan, Joseph T., Christie B. Simmons, Tonio Buonassisi, and Jacob J. Krich. "Targeted Search for Effective Intermediate Band Solar Cell Materials."
  5. ^ a b c d e Ramiro, Inigo, Antonio Martí, Elisa Antolin, and Antonio Luque. "Review of Experimental Results Related to the Operation of Intermediate Band Solar Cells." IEEE Xplore. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Nov. 2014.
  6. ^ a b c Luque, A., and Steven Hegedus. Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley, 2011. Print.
  7. ^ a b c López, N., L. Reichertz, K. Yu, K. Campman, and W. Walukiewicz. "Engineering the Electronic Band Structure for Multiband Solar Cells." Physical Review Letters 106.2 (2011): 028701-1-28701-4. Web.
  8. ^ a b Tanaka, Tooru, Kin M. Yu, Alejandro X. Levander, Oscar D. Dubon, Lothar A. Reichertz, Nair Lopez, Mitsuhiro Nishio, and Wladek Walukiewicz. "Demonstration of ZnTe1-xOx Intermediate Band Solar Cell." Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 50 (2011): 082304-1-82304-3. Web.
  9. ^ Luque, Antonio, Antonio Martí, and Colin Stanley. "Understanding Intermediate-band Solar Cells." Nature Photonics 6.3 (2012): 146-52. Web.
  10. ^ a b c d Krich, Jacob J., Bertrand I. Halperin, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. "Nonradiative Lifetimes in Intermediate Band Photovoltaics—Absence of Lifetime Recovery." Journal of Applied Physics 112.1 (2012): 013707-1-13707-8. Web.
  11. ^ Sher, Meng-Ju, Christie B. Simmons, Jacob J. Krich, Austin J. Akey, Mark T. Winkler, Daniel Recht, Tonio Buonassisi, Michael J. Aziz, and Aaron M. Lindenberg. "Picosecond Carrier Recombination Dynamics in Chalcogen-hyperdoped Silicon." Applied Physics Letters 105 (2014): 053905-1-53905-5. Web.