International System of Electrical and Magnetic Units
The International System of Electrical and Magnetic Units is an obsolete system of units used solely for measuring electrical and magnetic quantities. It was introduced by the Fourth International Electrical Congress (Chicago, 1893) and modified in 1908. It was rendered obsolete by the inclusion of electromagnetic units in the International System of Units (SI) in 1948.
The link between electromagnetic units and the more familiar units of length, mass and time was first demonstrated by Gauss in 1832 with his measurement of the Earth's magnetic field, and the principle was extended to electrical measurements by Neumann in 1845. A complete system of metric electrical and magnetic units was proposed by Weber in 1851.[Note 1]
The development of the electric telegraph (an invention of Gauss and Weber) demonstrated the need for accurate electrical measurements. At the behest of Thomson, the British Association for the Advancement of Science (B.A.) set up a committee in 1862 to examine the options for standardizing electrical and magnetic units. After much discussion, the committee decided to adapt Weber's proposals to the CGS system of units:[Note 1] however the resulting "absolute" units were both difficult to realize and (often) impractically small. To overcome these handicaps, the B.A. also proposed a set of "practical" or "reproduceable" units, which were not directly linked to the CGS system but which were, as near as experimental accuracy allowed, equal to multiples of the corresponding CGS units.[Note 2]
The B.A. system of practical units gained considerable international support, and was adopted – with one important modification – by the First International Conference of Electricians (Paris, 1881). The British Association had constructed an artefact representation of the ohm (a standard length of resistance wire which had a resistance of 109 CGS units of electric resistance, that is one ohm) whereas the international conference preferred a method of realization that could be repeated in different laboratories in different countries. The chosen method was based on the resistivity of mercury, by measuring the resistance of a column of mercury of specified dimensions (106 cm × 1 mm2): however, the chosen length of column was almost 3 millimetres too short, leading to a difference of 0.28% between the new practical units and the CGS units which were supposedly their basis.
The anomaly was resolved at another international conference, in Chicago in 1893, by a correction in the definition of the ohm. The units agreed at this conference were termed "international" units, to distinguish them from their predecessors.
|Unit||1893 ("international") definition[Note 3]||CGS ("absolute") equivalent||Notes|
|Ampere||the unvarying current which, when passed through a solution of silver nitrate in water, deposits silver at the rate of 0.001 118 00 grams per second||the current produced in a conductor with a 1 ohm resistance when there is a potential difference of 1 volt between its ends||0.1 cgs units of electric current|
|Ohm||the resistance offered to an unvarying electric current by a column of mercury at the temperature of melting ice 14.4521 grams in mass, of a constant cross-sectional area and of the length of 106.3 centimetres||109 cgs units of electric resistance|
|Volt||1000⁄1434 of the electromotive force of a Clark cell at a temperature of 15 °C||the electromotive force produced in an electric circuit which cuts 108 magnetic lines of force per second||108 cgs units of electromotive force|
The international units did not have the same formal legal status as the metre and the kilogram through the Metre Convention (1875), although several countries adopted the definition within their national laws (e.g., the United States, through Public Law 105 of July 12, 1894).
Overdefinition and the 1908 modification
The 1893 system of units was overdefined, as can be seen from an examination of Ohm's law:
By Ohm's law, knowing any two of the physical quantities V, I or R (potential difference, current or resistance) will define the third, and yet the 1893 system defines the units for all three quantities. With improvements in measurement techniques, it was soon recognised that
- 1 Vint ≠ 1 Aint × 1 Ωint.
The solution came at an international conference in London in 1908. The essential point was to reduce the number of base units from three to two by redefining the international volt as a derived unit. There were several other modifications of less practical importance:
- the international ampere and the international ohm were formally defined in terms of the corresponding CGS electromagnetic units, with the 1893 definitions retained as preferred realizations;
- the preferred realization of the international volt was in terms of the electromotive force of a Weston cell at 20 °C (1.0184 Vint), as this type of cell has a lower temperature coefficient than the Clark cell;
- several other derived units for use in electrical and magnetic measurements were formally defined:[Note 3]
- International Coulomb
- the electric charge transferred by a current of one international ampere in one second;[Note 4]
- International Farad
- the capacitance of a capacitor charged to a potential of one international volt by one international coulomb of electricity;[Note 4]
- 107 units of work in the CGS system, represented sufficiently well for practical use by the energy expended in one second by an international ampere in an international ohm;
- 107 units of power in the CGS system, represented sufficiently well for practical use by the work done at the rate of one joule per second;
- the inductance in a circuit when an electromotive force induced in this circuit is one international volt, while the inducing current varies at the rate of one ampere per second.
With advances in the theory of electromagnetism and in quantity calculus, it became apparent that a coherent absolute system of units could only include one electromagnetic base unit. The first such system was proposed by Giorgi in 1901: it used the ohm as the additional base unit in the MKS system, and so is often referred to as the MKSΩ system or the Giorgi system.
An additional problem with the CGS system of electrical units, pointed out as early as 1882 by Heaviside, was that they were not "rationalized", that is they failed to properly take account of permittivity and permeability as properties of a medium. Giorgi was also a great proponent of rationalization of the electrical units.
The choice of electrical unit for the base unit in a rationalized system depends only on practical considerations, particularly the ability to realize the unit accurately and reproducibly. The ampere rapidly gained support over the ohm, as many national standards laboratories were already realizing the ampere in absolute terms using ampere balances. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) adopted the Giorgi system with the ampere replacing the ohm in 1935, and this choice of base units is often called the MKSA system.
The International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) approved a new set of definitions for electrical units, based on the rationalized MKSA system, in 1946, and these were internationally adopted under the Metre Convention by the 9th General Conference on Weights and Measures in 1948. Under this system, which would become the International System of Units (SI), the ohm is a derived unit.[Note 5]
The SI definitions of the electrical units are formally equivalent to the 1908 international definitions, and so there should not have been any change in the size of the units. Nevertheless, the international ohm and the international volt were not usually realized in absolute terms but by reference to a standard resistance and a standard electromotive force respectively. The realizations recommended in 1908 are not exactly equivalent to the absolute definitions: recommended conversion factors are
- 1 Ωint ≈ 1.000 49 Ω
- 1 Vint ≈ 1.000 34 V
although slightly different factors may apply for individual standards in national measurement laboratories.[Note 6] As the international ampere was usually realized by means of an ampere balance rather than electrolytically, 1 Aint = 1 A. The conversion factor for the "electrolytic" ampere (Aelec) can be calculated from modern values of the atomic weight of silver and the Faraday constant:
- 1 Aelec = 1.000 022(2) A
Notes and references
- Weber's original proposal was based on a millimetre–milligram–second system of units.
- It soon became apparent that the B.A. had developed two sets of CGS units. The practical units were based on the electromagnetic set of units rather than on the electrostatic set.
- The terminology of some of the definitions has been updated to modern usage.
- The coulomb and the farad had been used in earlier B.A. systems of electrical units with slightly different definitions, hence the need to add the qualifier "international".
- The ohm is the electric resistance between two points of a conductor when a constant potential difference of 1 volt, applied to these points, produces in the conductor a current of 1 ampere, the conductor not being the seat of any electromotive force.
- Conversion factors for the U.S. national standards (NIST) are 1 Ωint = 1.000 495 Ω and 1 Vint = 1.000 330 V.
- Gauss, C. F. (1832–37), "Intensitas vis magneticae terrestris ad mensuram absolutam revocata", Commentationes Societatis Regiae Scientiarum Gottingensis Recentiores, 8: 3–44. English translation.
- Neumann, F. E. (1845), Abhandlungen der Königlichen Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin: 1–87 http://bibliothek.bbaw.de/bbaw/bibliothek-digital/digitalequellen/schriften/anzeige/index_html?band=07-abh/1845&seite:int=24 Missing or empty
|contribution=ignored (help); Franz Neumanns gesammelte Werke, 3, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1912, pp. 257–344. Neumann, F. (1847), "Über ein allgemeines Princip der mathematischen Theorie inducirter elektrischer Ströme", Abhandlungen der Königlichen Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin: 1–71; Franz Neumanns gesammelte Werke, 3, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1912, pp. 345–424.
- "Weber, Wilhelm Eduard", Encyclopædia Britannica, 28 (11th ed.), 1911, p. 458.
- Jenkin, Fleeming (1873), Reports of the Committee on Electrical Standards, London.
- "Units, Physical", Encyclopædia Britannica, 27 (11th ed.), 1911, pp. 738–45.
- ohm, sizes.com, retrieved 2010-08-11.
- Giovanni Giorgi, International Electrotechnical Commission, retrieved 2014-02-21.
- Giorgi, G., Rational Units of Electromagnetism. Original manuscript with handwritten notes by Oliver Heaviside.
- Heaviside, O. (1882), "The Relations between Magnetic Force and Electric Current", The Electrician (18 November).
- Glazebrook, R. T. (1936), "The fourth unit of the Giorgi system of electrical units", Proc. Phys. Soc., 48: 452, doi:10.1088/0959-5309/48/3/312.
- International Bureau of Weights and Measures (2006), The International System of Units (SI) (PDF) (8th ed.), p. 144, ISBN 92-822-2213-6.
- International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (1993). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 2nd edition, Oxford: Blackwell Science. ISBN 0-632-03583-8. p. 114. Electronic version..