Ioan Bianu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ioan Bianu
Photograph of Bianu, ca. 1920
Born1856 or 1857
DiedFebruary 13, 1935 (aged 78–79)
ResidenceEastern Europe
Other namesIon Bianu, Ion Frunză
Academic background
InfluencesTimotei Cipariu, Émile Legrand, Ioan Micu Moldovan, Émile Picot
Academic work
Era19th and 20th centuries
Main interests
InfluencedAlexandru Rosetti, Radu R. Rosetti

Ioan Bianu (1856 or 1857[a] – February 13, 1935) was an Imperial Austrian-born Romanian philologist and bibliographer. The son of a peasant family from Transylvania, he completed high school in Blaj, where he became a disciple of Timotei Cipariu and Ioan Micu Moldovan. As a youth, he espoused Romanian nationalism, and came into conflict with the Austro-Hungarian authorities, before finally emigrating to the Romanian Old Kingdom in 1876. There, he attended the University of Bucharest, later joining the faculty, where he taught Romanian literary history. He was affiliated with the Romanian Academy Library for over half a century, transforming the institution from the meager state in which he found it, and overseeing a five-fold increase of its collection. He helped author two important multi-volume works detailing early books and manuscripts from his country, and was a founder of library and information science in his adoptive country. Near the end of his life, struggling with deafness, Bianu withdrew from the Library in favor of his friend Radu R. Rosetti, but went on to serve as president of the Romanian Academy.

Bianu's scholarship was doubled by his work as an organizer in the field, and, especially after 1880, by a participation in political intrigues. He was a disciple of Dimitrie Sturdza, joining the latter's National Liberal Party and canvassing support in academia. Bianu continued to agitate among the Transylvanian Romanians, but, by 1896, both he and Sturdza had turned moderate on the national issue, and favored a rapprochement with Austria-Hungary. As such, Bianu was a "Germanophile" during World War I, meaning that he criticized Romania's alliance with the Entente Powers. He remained in German-occupied territory following the fall of Bucharest, but was spared persecution upon the end of war.



He was born in Făget (Oláhbükkös), a village east of the Transylvanian town of Blaj[1] (on the southern border of Kis-Küküllő County from 1876, and nowadays in Alba County). His parents, Grigore and Anica (née Popa), married in 1855; it was Grigore's second marriage.[2] The couple had two sons and three daughters, all of whom survived into adulthood.[3] The Bianu family was an old peasant one of some means, the village a small Romanian one on a hillside. Living in proximity to the spiritual center of the Romanian Greek-Catholic Church in what was then the Austrian Empire, they belonged to that faith.[4] Bianu attended primary school in his native village. His father understood the importance of schooling, even if this implied material sacrifices, and the boy studied for nearly a decade at the gymnasium and the Romanian high school in Blaj.[5] When he arrived in 1868, the local atmosphere was uncertain and marked by the faculty's activism against the recent Austro-Hungarian Compromise, which consecrated Transylvania part of the Hungarian Crown, against Romanian demands.[6]

While Bianu was there, Timotei Cipariu was at the height of his career.[1] He lived with one of his teachers, Ioan Micu Moldovan, who helped provide for his daily needs and with whom the former pupil kept touch until the teacher's death in 1915. It was in Moldovan's home that Bianu's interest in old Romanian books was first awakened, and he recalled in later years how he was treated there like a son.[7] One of his final acts at the school was to participate in an annual demonstration of the May 1848 assembly on Câmpia Libertății. This was the last such gathering, as the Hungarian authorities banned them henceforth.[8]

Bianu graduated in 1876, in the same class as his cousin Vasile Bianu, the future physician and political figure.[9] Bearing a recommendation from Moldovan for August Treboniu Laurian, Ioan left for Bucharest, capital of the Romanian Old Kingdom;[10] four classmates joined him in emigrating.[8] Laurian, supported by the poet Gheorghe Sion,[11] obtained him a post as assistant at the Central State Library. He was thus able to support himself until 1880 while attending the literature and philosophy faculty of Bucharest University. In early 1879, he was named archivist and librarian of the Romanian Academy.[12] Notoriously thrifty, he lived on the Romanian Academy Library grounds, downtown Bucharest, where he also raised cows.[13]

In 1881, he won a competition to become professor of Romanian language and literature at Saint Sava National College.[14] Later that year, with the help of his former professor Bogdan Petriceicu Hasdeu,[15] he received a scholarship to study Romance philology in Milan and Paris.[16] He met the Romanist Émile Picot,[17] took courses with Graziadio Isaia Ascoli and Gaston Paris, but the lasting impact of his sojourn lay in the eye-opening visits to libraries.[18] Impressed by the Palazzo Brera, the Biblioteca Ambrosiana, libraries across Italy, the Bibliothèque nationale de France, the British Museum and the Bodleian Library, he at the same time became keenly aware of the poor state of Romania's libraries and gathered ideas for their improvement.[19]

Bianu at his Romanian Academy Library desk, ca. 1900

After returning home in 1883, he became assistant professor at Bucharest University's department of Romanian literature. He still made visits abroad: in 1885, he spent time in Galicia-Lodomeria, researching the Jagiellonian Library for Romanian-related subjects, the Ossoliński archive at Lemberg, and the Dosoftei fund at Schowkwa.[20] Upon his own request, he was also sent to Russian Poland, where he researched the Radziwiłł collection at Nesvizh Castle. He was hosted there by Antoni Radziwiłł, who allowed him to copy some 300 documents,[21] and befriended his young daughter, later the Countess Potocki.[22]

Professor and National Liberal agent[edit]

Upon his return to Bucharest in June 1886, Bianu married Alexandrina Băicoianu, described by his friend Sextil Pușcariu as a "brilliantly spiritual" woman,[23] and was thus received into the Bucharest upper-class. As noted by social historian Lucian Nastasă, this move also ensured Bianu more recognition as a scholar, as well as access to politics—through Băicoianu, he was now related to historian Alexandru D. Xenopol and politician Nicolae Xenopol.[24] The couple were Pușcariu's godparents upon the latter's own wedding, in September 1905.[25]

In 1888, Bianu began his collaboration with Hasdeu's neoromantic literary review, Revista Nouă.[26] He contributed the book review column, as well as a biography of the writer Gheorghe Asachi.[27] Elected a corresponding member of the Academy in 1887, he was elevated to titular status in 1902.[28] After losing the Romanian literature chair to Ovid Densusianu in 1901, in 1902 Bianu became the titled holder of the Romanian literature history professorate at the University.[29] He was later also elected dean of the literature faculty.[30] In addition to such work, in 1904 he served on a panel of inquiry created by the Ministry of Education, closing down the Notre-Dame de Sion schools, accused of forcefully converting Orthodox students to Catholicism.[31]

Meanwhile, a member of the National Liberal Party (PNL) and auditor of its Bucharest club,[32] Bianu was an ally of Dimitrie Sturdza and reached the Assembly of Deputies. Without serious ambitions in this realm, he preferred to be a sort of éminence grise to the party leader.[33] From as early as 1887, he interceded between Sturdza and PNL-friendly academics, including the Slavist Ioan Bogdan, obtaining their support against rival Conservatives, and helping them travel for specialization abroad.[34] However, Bianu maintained links with the Conservatives' literary club, Junimea, which he frequented as an outside guest in the 1880s.[35] He also maintained links with the Conservative clubs of Western Moldavia, befriending the moderate Conservative Radu Rosetti—and then his young son, Radu R. Rosetti. The two politicians discussed issues on bipartisan policies, and even conspired to remove incompetent administrators of either hue from their offices.[36] He and Hasdeu also persuaded Radu Sr to start his work as a social historian and theorist, and afterward helped him to find employment as an archivist.[37] According to Nastasă, Bianu, allegedly the lover of Sturdza's wife Zoe,[38] was an expert at maneuvering the "levers of power", and presided upon his own "clique".[39]

Bianu was initially an orthodox Romanian nationalist, campaigning for unity between Romania and his native Transylvania. During the early 1880s, when Sturdza served as Academy president, Bianu returned to Blaj, hoping to persuade Cipariu to resume his contacts with the Academy. Cipariu objected, mainly because of his dislike for Hasdeu and his conflict with Laurian.[40] In 1892, Bianu joined the executive committee of the Cultural League for the Unity of All Romanians[41] and began sending out sponsorship to the leaders of the Transylvanian Memorandum protest movement.[42] During the backlash, Bianu was sent by Sturdza to assist Eugen Brote and other exiled Memorandists at Milan. His plan to resettle the participants in various European countries was nevertheless seen as "downright absurd" by its intended beneficiaries, who preferred to stand trial.[43]

Bianu's own stance on Transylvania changed over several years. In 1896, with Sturdza as Prime Minister, Bianu participated in the rapprochement with Austria-Hungary. During the state visit to Romania of Emperor Franz Joseph, Sturdza sent Bianu, Grigore Antipa, Ștefan Sihleanu and Barbu Ștefănescu Delavrancea to Vârciorova, where they were to meet Austrian delegates ahead of the Cultural League, which sent protesters. The two Romanian delegations clashed which each other, an incident which was reported with amusement in the Bucharest press.[44] Bianu also continued to work for the Bucharest National Liberal club during the next decade, helping Sturdza win over Junimea from the Conservatives. During the elections of 1905, he backed the Junimist candidate Titu Maiorescu and, in return, obtained Junimea's support for the National Liberal Petru Poni.[45] Bianu and Poni remained close friends for the rest of their lives.[46] Bianu also used his influence for advancing many other scholarly goals, such as when, in 1909, he brought to Romania Ramiro Ortiz, who founded the Bucharest school of Italian studies.[47]


During the earliest stages of World War I, with Romania still cautiously neutral, Bianu also took a neutralist attitude. Historian Nicolae Iorga, who was president of the Cultural League, noted that Bianu, unlike Sturdza, did not wish to see Romania committed to the Central Powers. This was because "he resented us fighting alongside the Hungarians, who never ever had any other objective but to crush us."[48] However, Bianu was also one of the Transylvanians and minority-PNL members who also rejected proposals to join the Entente Powers. Among these "Germanophiles", Bianu stood out for speaking out against the project to occupy Transylvania from Austria-Hungary with Entente support.[49] In August 1914, using the pen name Ion Frunză, he published the essay Pentru lămurirea situației. Cuvinte către români ("Making Things Clear. An Address to the Romanians"). This work, soon after translated into German, argued that the Entente was a cover for the Russian Empire, Pan-Slavism, and the "Turanic hordes"; he decried the persecution of Romanians in Austria-Hungary, but noted that they all fared much better than the Romanians living in Russia's Bessarabia Governorate.[50] This view was instantly supported by the sociologist Dimitrie Gusti, who suggested that "Frunză's admirable work" should be published "in millions of copies, so that every Romanian will read it".[51]

Eventually, in autumn 1916, a PNL cabinet and King Ferdinand I announced Romania's support for the Entente; Romanian troops briefly entered Transylvania, but Romania was in turn invaded by the Central Powers. Bianu stifled his opposition, but did not openly criticize all the Central Powers. In September, shortly after the Battle of Turtucaia, he penned in Viitorul an article specifically targeting the Kingdom of Bulgaria and the Bulgarians in Romania, whom he called "venomous snakes". According to historian Lucian Boia, this is "possibly the most anti-Bulgarian writing ever published in Romanian"; "Bianu says nothing about the Austro-Hungarians or Germans, as if Romanians had only been at war with the Bulgarians in 1916!"[52]

The Romanian army and administration headed for Western Moldavia: Bianu's son Alexandru was drafted, but, according to his adversaries, spent the war in relative safety at Bârlad, shying away from active duty.[53] Also controversially, Bianu Sr chose not to join the exodus, and remained with the Germanophiles and neutralists in occupied Bucharest, to 1918. He noted that he watched on, "eyes flooded in tears", as the German Army marched through the streets.[52] One of ten academicians to remain behind, he ensured that the Academy Library continued to function in relatively normal terms, refusing to publish under the occupation regime,[54] but also collaborating with the occupier to at least some degree.[55]

Bianu's letters of the occupation are a primary source for the activities of Germanophiles such as Antipa, Petre P. Carp, Alexandru Al. Beldiman, Alexandru Tzigara-Samurcaș, and Iacob Negruzzi.[56] Bianu sided with Carp in his critique of PNL politics, but, unlike him and Beldiman, did not call for the dethronement of King Ferdinand. He also refrained from signing up to Carp's openly pro-German platform.[57] Nevertheless, he was remembered by the anti-Germanophiles for participating at banquets hosted by the puppet governor, Lupu Kostaki.[58] The Austro-Hungarian Army also asked Bianu to vouch for officer Alexandru Leca Morariu, who was accused of being secretly a Romanian nationalist agitator.[59]

Romanian conceded defeat in May 1918, and the Academy could resume work in Bucharest under a German-friendly Conservative regime, with Alexandru Marghiloman as Prime Minister. In October, Bianu joined his returning peers and reported on the damages incurred during the previous years.[60] He scandalized public opinion further after ordering public mourning at the Academy after the death of a pro-Austrian cleric, Vasile Mangra.[61] The loyalist government was fully restored in Bucharest within a month, following the unexpected defeat of Germany, which led to the establishment of Greater Romania (which included united Transylvania). In December, Prime Minister Ion I. C. Brătianu was welcomed by the Academy. According to the now-disgraced Marghiloman, his supporters were either barred from attending or, in Bianu's case, silenced.[62] In this new climate, Bianu was investigated by an Academy commission as a wartime collaborator in March 1919, but refused to present himself for questioning. As he put it, the group investigating him only relied on cut-outs from the anti-Germanophile press.[63]

Final years[edit]

In May 1919, Bianu joined efforts with Iorga and other pro-Entente academicians in order to obtain the international recognition of Romania's new borders. However, they failed to convince Foreign Affairs to sponsor their diplomatic correspondence with Western European academies.[64] Although he was mentioned by name and castigated in the Academy commission report of July 1919,[65] Bianu suffered no further consequences. Three years later, a conflict erupted between King Ferdinand and the PNL, on one side, and the Transylvanian-based Romanian National Party (PNR), on the other. At core was the issue of Transylvanian autonomy. Bianu used his intermediary position to negotiate a PNR presence at Alba Iulia, where Ferdinand crowned himself King of Greater Romania, but was unable to convince Alexandru Vaida-Voevod.[66]

Bianu's time was divided between Bucharest and Predeal, where, in 1912, he had built himself a villa.[13] From ca. 1909, his wife had fallen ill and was hardly ever seen in public.[67] Their son Alexandru studied law in Paris and returned to Romania in 1923 to work as a bank clerk, before finally joining the diplomatic corps and serving as commercial attaché in London.[68] In 1924, Bianu helped organize Romania's first national congress of librarians, and later that year founded the country's first librarians' association,[69] alongside a Romanian Practical School of Archival Science, modeled on the École Nationale des Chartes.[70]

During his final years, he declared his dissatisfaction with the "exclusivist-repulsive individualism" in Romanian academic life, describing it as an "evil" influence.[71] In June 1925, he was forced to announce that the Academy had a 90% deficit and was cutting back on expenses.[72] He continued to intervene politically for his various protegés, including the literary critic Gheorghe Bogdan-Duică and the linguist Theodor Capidan, and steered the career of philologist Alexandru Rosetti.[73] In June 1926, Bianu and his cousin Vasile returned to Blaj for the Cultural League Congress, presided upon by Iorga.[9] He also reluctantly presented himself as a candidate for the post of Academy president, but lost by a large margin to Emil Racoviță.[74]

By then, Bianu had expressed his dislike of Italian fascism, and, as a consequence, the Italian authorities passed him over for awards and distinctions.[75] In April 1928, during his last months at University, he seconded Rector Ermil Pangrati in urging government to dissolve the antisemitic Union of Christian Students, which was causing disturbances and riots;[76] this stance was contrasted by Vasile, who, as a member of the Senate, argued that Romanian Jews sympathized with Hungarian irredentism.[77] His teaching hampered by a progressive deafness, which had begun much earlier in life, Bianu withdrew from the University in mid 1928, resigning his seat to his disciple, folklorist Dumitru Caracostea.[78] The previous year, Caracostea had contributed to a Bianu Festschrift, alongside Iorga, Pușcariu, Alexandru Rosetti, Vasile Bogrea, Nicolae Cartojan, Charles Drouhet, and Petre P. Panaitescu.[79] Although he had inaugurated a project to design a new Library building, Bianu ultimately resigned his position there in early 1931, assigning his seat to Radu R. Rosetti.[80] At the time, he announced that he was also suffering from kidney disease and rheumatism.[81]

Made secretary general of the Academy in 1927,[69] Bianu was elected as its president on June 1, 1929.[82] An early admirer and political ally,[83] the geologist Ludovic Mrazek, referred to Bianu as a force of professional conservatism, one of several "decent men and sincere patriots" who stood up to intellectual fads.[84] In January 1932, the new king Carol II made Bianu a Knight of the Order of the Crown.[85] The following month, on behalf of the Romanian Academy, Bianu and Gheorghe Țițeica began corresponding with the Soviet Academy of Sciences—part of a larger effort to bring about a détente in Romanian–Soviet relations.[86] He resigned later that year, but continued to serve as vice president to his death.[69]

A widower since December 1929,[67][87] Bianu died in his Bucharest home on February 13, 1935, after an episode of uremia. His body was laid in state at the Academy, and the Faculty of Letters marked the occasion by suspending courses for the day.[88] He was buried alongside Alexandrina Bianu in Plot 54 of Bellu cemetery.[87] In his obituary piece, the Cultural League's Iorga referred to Bianu as "the Academy's titular god".[89] Bianu's personal book collections, comprising some 1,400 volumes, was bequeathed to the Academy Library.[90]


Encouraged by Alexandru Odobescu, Ion Ghica and Sturdza, who inspired in him an appreciation for books and libraries, Bianu renounced the idea of a scientific career in favor of working as a librarian.[91] His first publication, in 1876, was a monograph on Samuil Micu-Klein. When he entered the Academy Library in 1879, the beginning of a 56-year affiliation that would end with his death,[92] the institution had 6,000 donated volumes; by 1885, there were 30,000 and its formative phase was complete.[12] In 1895, he started a bibliographic office at the library that through 1925 would attract the efforts of the country's scholars interested in creating a general bibliography of Romanian culture.[93]

Under his leadership, the need for additional research tools became apparent. He helped counter the lack of manuscripts, old books and documents on the language and national history by initiating an ample campaign for identifying and donating such materials.[94] He ensured that the Academy Library became the National Library and helped merge the Central State Library into this institution in 1901, later folding in a number of private libraries. He pushed for an 1884 law mandating printing presses to send two copies of everything they printed to the Academy Library, and was behind improvements to the law in 1904.[30] Also that year, he became one of the main proponents of reforming the Romanian alphabet,[84] but later declared himself against "excessive phoneticism", standing up to reformists such as Simion Mehedinți.[95] During the war, he and Ioan Bogdan reported trying to rescue the Library's Church Slavonic corpus from confiscation by the Bulgarian Armed Forces.[96]

Bianu authored a number of works on philology as well as history, particularly cultural history. Thoroughly familiar with old Romanian literature, he authored two books that remain valuable reference works. The first was the monumental Bibliografia Românească veche (1508–1830). Covering four volumes (1508–1716, 1716–1807, 1808–1817 and 1817–1830), it was written in collaboration with Nerva Hodoș and later Dan Simonescu.[97] First suggested to Bianu by Émile Picot, it was conceived as a coherent and pan-Romanian project, supplanting earlier catalogues by Vasile Popp and Cipariu.[98] As an analytical work, it was also based on Émile Legrand's Bibliographie hellénique ou description raisonnée des ouvrages publiés par des Grecs au XVIIIe siècle.[79]

The books it encompassed were published in the Romanian lands during this period in Romanian, Slavonic, Greek and even Georgian, by both Romanians and foreigners; it also included books published abroad by Romanians.[99] Publication began in 1903 (preceded by early drafts from 1898), took a nearly two-decade hiatus after Hodoș' death in 1913, and resumed once Simonescu joined the project in 1931. It was completed after Bianu's death, in 1944.[100] Likened to George Călinescu's history of Romanian literature, although more historic in aspect, it was the country's most ample bibliography at the time, praised by Iorga for its completeness.[94] It was however criticized by later bibliographers, and by Bianu himself, for being inconsistent and incomplete in its selection or presentation of titles.[101] The work covers 1,526 known books and 300 unknown works, going up to 2,024 with addenda and errata.[102]

Part of the preparation involved the 1898 press publication of an appeal for old books, in which priests, teachers, professors and others who owned or knew of books printed between 1508 and 1830 were asked to inform the library of their existence and if possible loan them. The appeal was accompanied by a list of 621 titles of known books in this category; its author was particularly interested in books not on the list. Bianu's call was received with particular enthusiasm in Transylvania.[103] His former teacher Moldovan emerged as a steady collaborator, not only facilitating access to his library and Cipariu's diocesan collection, but also providing valuable advice over the years.[104] In his turn, Moldovan sent a letter to the province's Greek-Catholic clergy, asking them to supply information about the rare books in their parishes, and Bianu soon received 140 responses regarding books that were not on his initial list.[105]

Bianu's other key work was the three-volume Catalogul manuscriselor românești din Biblioteca Academiei, written with two other authors and published between 1907 and 1931. Bianu published a number of other books on early Romanian literature as well as textual editions,[94] including Psaltirea Scheiană[79] and, in 1924, the newly discovered Codicele de la Ieud.[106] His close analysis of manuscripts and contributions to paleography through his study of the Romanian Cyrillic alphabet identify him as a historian;[107] he also involved himself in disputes with Slavists over the publishing of historical sources—whether they should follow the interests of linguists or cater to historians.[108] From 1926, he organized bibliophile exhibits at the Bellu House, on Academy grounds.[109] Additionally, Bianu was responsible for Creșterea Colecțiunilor, the Academy's bibliographic periodical, which between 1906 and 1929 chronicled the publications received by the library.[110] His colleagues there included Ilarie Chendi, Septimiu Albini, Alexandru Sadi-Ionescu, Vasile Pârvan, Alexandru Lapedatu, George Giuglea, George Murnu, Nicolae Cartojan, Alexandru Obedenaru, Constantin Moisil and Ioachim Crăciun.[111]



^ His date of birth is usually given as September 8 or October 1, 1856, although it is possible he was born in 1857; a date of February 20 has been proposed. Bianu himself stated he was born in 1856.[112]


  1. ^ a b Mihai, p. 253; Nastasă (2007), p. 142
  2. ^ Dumitraș, p. 206
  3. ^ Dumitraș, pp. 206–207
  4. ^ Dumitraș, p. 208
  5. ^ Dumitraș, p. 208. See also Nastasă (2007), p. 142
  6. ^ Dumitraș, pp. 208–210
  7. ^ Dumitraș, pp. 209–210. See also Nastasă (2007), p. 142
  8. ^ a b Dumitraș, p. 215
  9. ^ a b Victor Macaveiu, "Liga Culturală la Blaj. Congresul anual, 27—29 Iunie 1926", in Cultura Creștină, Nr. 4–6/1926, pp. 97–99
  10. ^ Mihai, p. 253. See also Nastasă (2007), pp. 142, 505
  11. ^ Nastasă (2007), p. 505
  12. ^ a b Mihai, p. 253
  13. ^ a b Nastasă (2007), p. 130; (2010), p. 396
  14. ^ Mihai, p. 253; Nastasă (2007), p. 505
  15. ^ Crăciun, pp. 787–788
  16. ^ Boia, p. 169; Mihai, p. 253; Nastasă (2007), pp. 202–203, 226, 399; Urs, p. 350
  17. ^ Urs, p. 350
  18. ^ Crăciun, p. 788; Nastasă (2007), p. 226
  19. ^ Crăciun, p. 788
  20. ^ Ioan Bianu, Insemnărĭ istorice și literare adunate din biblioteci și arhive galiţiene în vara anului 1885. Extrasŭ din Analele Academieĭ Române, Seria II, Tom. VIII, Secț. I. Bucharest: Tipografia Academieĭ Române (Laboratoriĭ Românĭ), 1886. See also Crăciun, p. 789
  21. ^ "Foița. Academia română. Sesiunea generală din anul 1887. Raportul secretatului general asupra lucrărilor făcute în anul 1886–87 (Urmare)", in Telegraful Român, Nr. 28/1887, p. 110
  22. ^ Iorga (1939, IV), p. 168
  23. ^ Nastasă (2010), p. 99
  24. ^ Nastasă (2007), pp. 505–506; (2010), pp. 99, 103
  25. ^ Nastasă (2010), pp. 111, 149
  26. ^ George Călinescu, Istoria literaturii române de la origini pînă în prezent, pp. 567, 569. Bucharest: Editura Minerva, 1986
  27. ^ Victor Bilciurescu, Bucureștii și bucureștenii de ieri și de azi, pp. 266, 269. Bucharest: Editura Ziarului Universul, 1945.
  28. ^ Mihai, p. 253; Nastasă (2007), pp. 26, 495, 503, 506, 509–510
  29. ^ Nastasă (2007), pp. 245–246, 385, 398–402. See also Mihai, p. 253
  30. ^ a b Crăciun, p. 789
  31. ^ Constantin Bacalbașa, Bucureștii de altă dată, Vol. III, p. 84. Bucharest: Universul, 1936
  32. ^ Bacalbașa (1928), p. 144
  33. ^ Boia, p. 169. See also Nastasă (2007), pp. 83, 89, 270–271; (2010), p. 257; Rosetti, p. 50
  34. ^ Nastasă (2007), pp. 89, 106–107, 233–234, 270–272, 294, 320–321, 327–329; (2010), pp. 171–172, 350–351, 398
  35. ^ Ornea, p. 92
  36. ^ Rosetti, pp. 26, 41, 45, 50, 81, 88, 106, 132–134
  37. ^ Rosetti, pp. 45, 83, 106
  38. ^ Nastasă (2010), p. 257
  39. ^ Nastasă (2007), p. 131
  40. ^ Rusu Abrudeanu, p. 371
  41. ^ Bacalbașa (1928), pp. 143–144
  42. ^ Rusu Abrudeanu, p. 92
  43. ^ Valeriu Braniște, "Avanpremieră editorială. Clandestin prin imperiu", in Magazin Istoric, October 1971, p. 60
  44. ^ Bacalbașa (1928), pp. 217–218
  45. ^ Ornea, p. 359
  46. ^ Nastasă (2010), p. 227
  47. ^ Nastasă (2007), pp. 227, 420
  48. ^ Iorga (1939, IV), p. 98
  49. ^ Boia, pp. 73, 81, 109–110
  50. ^ Boia, pp. 169–171, 208, 232–233, 254
  51. ^ Boia, pp. 232–233
  52. ^ a b Boia, p. 171
  53. ^ Marcel Proca, "Bârladul în Primul Război Mondial. Mărturii documentare", in Acta Musei Tutovensis. Memorialistică, Vol. III, 2018, p. 98
  54. ^ Iorga (1930), p. 48
  55. ^ Boia, pp. 109–110, 124, 172–176
  56. ^ Boia, pp. 45, 73–74, 138, 172–176, 186–187, 193–194, 253–254
  57. ^ Boia, pp. 173–175
  58. ^ Cancicov, pp. 125–126
  59. ^ Iorga (1930), p. 21
  60. ^ Iorga (1930), p. 81
  61. ^ Cancicov, p. 573
  62. ^ Alexandru Marghiloman, Note politice, 4. 1918–1919, p. 183. Bucharest: Editura Institutului de Arte Grafice Eminescu, 1927
  63. ^ Boia, pp. 348, 349
  64. ^ Iorga (1930), pp. 208–210
  65. ^ Boia, pp. 352–353
  66. ^ Rusu Abrudeanu, pp. 481–484
  67. ^ a b Iorga (1936), pp. 323–324
  68. ^ Nastasă (2010), pp. 301, 457
  69. ^ a b c ‹See Tfd›(in Romanian) Dina Paladi, "Bibliologi celebri", in Revista Bibliotecii Naționale a României, Vol. XIV, Nr. 1, p. 64
  70. ^ Nastasă (2007), p. 187
  71. ^ Nastasă (2007), pp. 323–324
  72. ^ Iorga (1939, V), p. 34
  73. ^ Nastasă (2007), pp. 113–114, 185, 190–193, 295–296, 302–303, 323–324, 360, 504, 506; (2010), p. 361
  74. ^ Iorga (1939, V), p. 136
  75. ^ Iorga (1939, V), pp. 185–186
  76. ^ Lucian Nastasă, Antisemitismul universitar în România (1919–1939), pp. 403–404. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Institutului pentru Studierea Problemelor Minorităților Naționale, 2011. ISBN 978-6-06-927445-3
  77. ^ Attila Gidó, Două decenii. Evreii din Cluj în perioada interbelică, p. 115. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Institutului pentru Studierea Problemelor Minorităților Naționale, 2014. ISBN 978-606-8377-28-5
  78. ^ Nastasă (2007), pp. 296, 363–364, 437, 482; (2010), pp. 249, 413, 418
  79. ^ a b c N. N. Condéescou, "Omagiu lui I. Bianu din partea colegilor și foștilor săi elevi", in Revue Critique d'Histoire et de Littérature, Vol. 63, Issue 1, January 1929, pp. 43–44
  80. ^ Vasile Secrieru, "Radu R. Rosetti – istoric militar, academician și bibliotecar", in Confluențe Bibliologice, Nr. 1–2/2006, pp. 31–32
  81. ^ Iorga (1939, VI), p. 103
  82. ^ Iorga (1939, V), p. 347
  83. ^ Boia, p. 254
  84. ^ a b Nastasă (2007), p. 495
  85. ^ Iorga (1939, VI), p. 75
  86. ^ Iorga (1939, VI), pp. 317–318
  87. ^ a b Gheorghe G. Bezviconi, Necropola Capitalei, p. 67. Bucharest: Nicolae Iorga Institute of History, 1972
  88. ^ Nastasă (2010), pp. 437, 457
  89. ^ Iorga (1936), p. 436
  90. ^ Nastasă (2010), p. 451
  91. ^ Mihai, p. 253. See also Nastasă (2007), pp. 43, 202–203, 499
  92. ^ Dumitraș, p. 205
  93. ^ Mihai, pp. 253–254
  94. ^ a b c Mihai, p. 254
  95. ^ Iorga (1939, VI), pp. 61, 313
  96. ^ Boia, pp. 174–175, 186; Iorga (1930), pp. 47–48, 51–52, 81
  97. ^ Mihai, p. 254; Urs, passim
  98. ^ Urs, p. 349
  99. ^ Urs, pp. 351–352, 354; Vladu, p. 9
  100. ^ Urs, p. 351. See also Mihai, pp. 253–254; Vladu, p. 14
  101. ^ Urs, pp. 352–354
  102. ^ Urs, p. 351. See also Mihai, p. 254
  103. ^ Vladu, p. 9
  104. ^ Urs, pp. 350–351; Vladu, p. 9
  105. ^ Vladu, p. 10
  106. ^ Viorel Câmpean, Oameni și locuri din Sătmar, Vol. I, p. 124. Satu Mare: Citadela, 2008. ISBN 978-973-88823-0-0
  107. ^ Mihai, p. 256
  108. ^ Nastasă (2007), pp. 113–114, 185, 190–193, 295–296, 302–303
  109. ^ C. A. V., "Cartea românească veche", in Cultura Creștină, Nr. 4–6/1926, pp. 171–174
  110. ^ Crăciun, p. 791
  111. ^ Crăciun, pp. 791–792
  112. ^ Dumitraș, pp. 205–206, 207