Ion-propelled aircraft

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

An ion-propelled aircraft or, shortened ionocraft, is an aircraft that uses electrohydrodynamics (EHD) to provide lift or thrust in the air without requiring combustion or moving parts. Current designs do not produce sufficient thrust for manned flight or useful loads.

History[edit]

Origins[edit]

The principle of ionic wind propulsion with corona-generated charged particles was discovered soon after the discovery of electricity with references dating to 1709 in a book titled Physico-Mechanical Experiments on Various Subjects by Francis Hauksbee.

VTOL "lifter" experiments[edit]

American experimenter Thomas Townsend Brown spent much of his life working on the principle, under the mistaken impression that it was an anti-gravity effect, which he named the Biefeld–Brown effect. Since his devices produced thrust in the direction of the field gradient, regardless of the direction of gravity, and did not work in a vacuum, other workers realized that the effect was due to EHD.[1][2]

VTOL ion-propelled aircraft are sometimes called "lifters". Early examples were able to lift about a gram of weight per watt,[3] This was insufficient to lift the heavy high-voltage power supply necessary, which remained on the ground and supplied the craft via long, thin and flexible wires.

The use of EHD propulsion for lift was studied by American aircraft designer Major Alexander Prokofieff de Seversky in the 1950s and 1960s. He filed a patent for an "ionocraft" in 1959.[4] He built and flew a model VTOL ionocraft capable of sideways manoeuvring by varying the voltages applied in different areas, although the heavy power supply remained external.[5]

The 2008 Wingless Electromagnetic Air Vehicle (WEAV) is a saucer-shaped EHD lifter with electrodes embedded throughout its surface was studied by a team of researchers led by Subrata Roy at the University of Florida in the early part of the twenty-first century. The propulsion system employed many innovations, including the use of magnetic fields to enhance the ionisation efficiency. A model with an external supply achieved minimal lift-off and hover.[6][7]

Onboard power[edit]

Twenty-first century power supplies are lighter and more efficient.[8][9] The first ion-propelled aircraft to take off and fly using its own onboard power supply was a VTOL craft developed by Ethan Krauss of Electron Air in 2006.[10] His patent application was filed in 2014.[11] The craft developed enough thrust to rise rapidly or to fly horizontally for several minutes.[10][12]

In November 2018 the first self-contained ion-propelled fixed-wing airplane, the MIT EAD Airframe Version 2 flew 60 meters. It was developed by a team of students led by Steven Barrett from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. It had a 5-meter wingspan and weighed 2.45 kg.[13] The craft was catapult-launched using an elastic band, with the EAD system sustaining the aircraft in flight at low level.

Principles of operation[edit]

Ionic air propulsion is a technique for creating a flow of air through electrical energy, without any moving parts. Because of this it is sometimes described as a "solid-state" drive. It is based on the principle of electrohydrodynamics.

In its basic form, it consists of two parallel conductive electrodes, a leading emitter wire and a downstream collector. When such an arrangement is powered by high voltage (in the range of kilovolts per mm), the emitter ionizes molecules in the air that accelerate backwards to the collector, producing thrust in reaction. Along the way, these ions collide with electrically neutral air molecules and accelerate them in turn.

The effect is not directly dependent on electrical polarity, as the ions may be positively or negatively charged. Reversing the polarity of the electrodes does not alter the direction of motion, as it also reverses the polarity of the ions to match. Thrust is produced in the same direction, either way. For positive emitter polarity, nitrogen ions are the main charge carriers, while for negative polarity, oxygen ions are the main carriers and ozone production is higher.[citation needed]

EHD thrusters are far less efficient than conventional engines.[14]

Unlike pure ion thruster rockets, the electrohydrodynamic principle does not apply in the vacuum of space.[15]

Electrohydrodynamics[edit]

The thrust generated by an EHD device is an example of the Biefeld–Brown effect and can be derived through a modified use of the Child–Langmuir equation.[16] A generalized one-dimensional treatment gives the equation:

where

  • F is the resulting force.
  • I is the electric current flow.
  • d is the air gap.
  • k is the ion mobility coefficient of the working fluid,[17] measured in amp-sec2/kg in SI units. (The nominal value for air is 2×10−4 m2 V−1 s−1).[citation needed]

As applied to a gas such as air, the principle is also referred to as electroaerodynamics (EAD).

When the ionocraft is turned on, the corona wire becomes charged with high voltage, usually between 20 and 50 kV. When the corona wire reaches approximately 30 kV, it causes the air molecules nearby to become ionised by stripping their electrons from them. As this happens, the ions are repelled from the anode and attracted towards the collector, causing the majority of the ions to accelerate toward the collector. These ions travel at a constant average velocity termed the drift velocity. Such velocity depends on the mean free path between collisions, the strength of the external electric field, and the mass of ions and neutral air molecules.

The fact that the current is carried by a corona discharge (and not a tightly-confined arc) means that the moving particles diffuse into an expanding ion cloud, and collide frequently with neutral air molecules. It is these collisions that create thrust. The momentum of the ion cloud is partially imparted onto the neutral air molecules that it collides with, which, because they are neutral, do not migrate back to the second electrode. Instead they continue to travel in the same direction, creating a neutral wind. As these neutral molecules are ejected from the ionocraft, there are, in agreement with Newton's Third Law of Motion, equal and opposite forces, so the ionocraft moves in the opposite direction with an equal force. The force exerted is comparable to a gentle breeze. The resulting thrust depends on other external factors including air pressure and temperature, gas composition, voltage, humidity, and air gap distance.

The air mass in the gap between the electrodes is impacted repeatedly by excited particles moving at high drift velocity. This creates electrical resistance, which must be overcome. The end result of the neutral air caught in the process is to effectively cause an exchange in momentum and thus generate thrust. The heavier and denser the air, the higher the resulting thrust.

Aircraft configuration[edit]

As with conventional reaction thrust, EAD thrust may be directed either horizontally to power a fixed-wing airplane or vertically to support a powered lift craft, sometimes referred to as a "lifter".

Design[edit]

Typical ionocraft construction

The thrust generating components of an ion propulsion system consist of three parts; a corona or emitter wire, an air gap and a collector wire or strip downstream from the emitter. A lightweight insulating frame supports the arrangement. The emitter and collector should be as close to each other as possible, i.e. with a narrow air gap, to achieve a saturated corona current condition that produces maximum thrust. However, if the emitter is too close to the collector it tends to arc across the gap.[citation needed]

Ion propulsion systems require many safety precautions due to the required high voltage.

Emitter[edit]

The emitter wire is typically connected to the positive terminal of the high voltage power supply. In general, it is made from a small gauge bare conductive wire. While copper wire can be used, it does not work as well as stainless steel. Similarly, thinner wire such as 44 or 50 gauge tends to outperform more common, larger sizes such as 30 gauge, as the stronger electric field around the smaller diameter wire results in better ionisation and a larger corona current.[citation needed]

The emitter is sometimes referred to as the "corona wire" because of its tendency to emit a purple corona discharge glow while in use.[citation needed] This is simply a side effect of ionization.

Air gap[edit]

The air gap insulates the two electrodes and allows the ions generated at the emitter to accelerate and transfer momentum to neutral air molecules, before losing their charge at the collector. The width of the air gap is typically 1 mm / kV.[citation needed]

Collector[edit]

The collector is shaped to provide a smooth equipotential surface underneath the corona wire. Variations of this include a wire mesh, parallel conductive tubes, or a foil skirt with a smooth, round edge. Sharp edges on the skirt degrade performance, as it generates ions of opposite polarity to those within the thrust mechanism.[citation needed]

Pseudoscientific theories[edit]

Electrogravitics is a false physical theory proposed by Thomas Townsend Brown, purporting to link electric field effects with anti-gravity. Although long disproved, the theory has remained associated with the idea of ionocraft lifters and has become part of UFO folklore.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Thompson, Clive (August 2003). "The Antigravity Underground". Wired Magazine.
  2. ^ Tajmar, M. (2004). "Biefeld–Brown Effect: Misinterpretation of Corona Wind Phenomena". AIAA Journal. 42 (2): 315–318. Bibcode:2004AIAAJ..42..315T. doi:10.2514/1.9095.
  3. ^ Lifter efficiency relation to ion velocity "J L Naudin’s Lifter-3 pulsed HV 1.13g/Watt" Archived 2014-08-08 at the Wayback Machine
  4. ^ U.S. Patent 3,130,945, Filed Aug 31 1959, Published April 28, 1954.
  5. ^ Major de Seversky's Ion-Propelled Aircraft. 122. Popular mechanics. August 1964. pp. 58–61.
  6. ^ Greenemeier, Larry (7 July 2008). "The World's First Flying Saucer: Made Right Here on Earth". Scientific American.
  7. ^ Roy, Subrata; Arnold, David; Lin, Jenshan; Schmidt, Tony; Lind, Rick; et al. (2011). Air Force Office of Scientific Research; University of Florida (eds.). Demonstration of a Wingless Electromagnetic Air Vehicle (PDF) (Report). Defense Technical Information Center. ASIN B01IKW9SES. AFRL-OSR-VA-TR-2012-0922.
  8. ^ Borg, Xavier; "Full analysis & design solutions for EHD Thrusters at saturated corona current conditions", The General Science Journal (non-peer-review), 2004, Updated 2006.
  9. ^ Granados, Victor H.; Pinheiro, Mario J.; Sa, Paulo A. (July 2016). "Electrostatic propulsion device for aerodynamics applications". Physics of Plasmas. 23 (7): 073514. Bibcode:2016PhPl...23g3514G. doi:10.1063/1.4958815.
  10. ^ a b "Ion-Powered Aircraft Invention". The Stardust-Startup Factory. 2019-02-27. Retrieved 2019-08-15. The flying device originally lifted its power supply directly off of the ground with no moving parts in 2006.
  11. ^ us 10119527 
  12. ^ Video on YouTube
  13. ^ Hern, Alex (2018-11-21). "First ever plane with no moving parts takes flight". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-11-25.
  14. ^ Chen, Angus. "Silent and Simple Ion Engine Powers a Plane with No Moving Parts". Scientific American. Retrieved 2019-08-15.
  15. ^ "Ion Propulsion" (PDF).
  16. ^ "Electrokinetic devices in air" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-04-25.
  17. ^ Tammet, H. (1998). "Reduction of air ion mobility to standard conditions". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 103: 13933–13937. doi:10.1029/97JD01429.

Sources[edit]

External links[edit]