Isioma Daniel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Isioma Daniel
Isioma Daniel.jpg
Born Isioma Nkemdilim Nkiruka Daniel
Education journalism and politics at University of Central Lancashire
Occupation Newspaper journalist
Notable credit(s) Newspaper journalist whose column became the catalyst for religious violence in Nigeria, and who subsequently had to flee the country.

Isioma Nkemdilim Nkiruka Daniel (born 1981) is a Nigerian journalist whose 2002 newspaper article comment involving the Islamic prophet Muhammad sparked the Miss World riots and caused a fatwa to be issued on her life.

The 2002 Nigeria riots[edit]

Isioma Daniel studied journalism and politics for three years at the University of Central Lancashire, graduating in summer of 2001.[1][2] Her first job as a journalist was at Thisday, a Lagos-based national daily newspaper.[2] As a fashion writer, she authored a November 16, 2002 comment piece on Miss World beauty pageant that was to be held in Nigeria later that year. Addressing opposition to the contest from the Nigerian Muslim community, she made the following remark:

"The Muslims thought it was immoral to bring 92 women to Nigeria and ask them to revel in vanity. What would Mohammed think? In all honesty, he would probably have chosen a wife from one of them."[1]

According to Daniel, the sentence was added at the last minute; she thought it was "funny, light hearted" and "didn't see it as anything anybody should take seriously or cause much fuss".[3] However, that judgment quickly proved wrong, as the publication triggered violent religious riots that left more than 200 dead[4] and 1,000 injured, while 11,000 people were made homeless.[5] Thisday's offices in Kaduna were torched, despite the paper's apology and retraction on the front page.[1][4][6]

Daniel resigned from the newspaper the day after her article appeared.[1] Soon after, fearing for her safety and worried about the impending interrogation by the Nigerian state security, she left the country for Benin.[4]

On 26 November 2002 an Islamist government of Zamfara, Nigerian northern state, issued a fatwa against Isioma Daniel; in words of Zamfara deputy governor Mamuda Aliyu Shinkafi, later broadcast on the local radio:

"Like Salman Rushdie, the blood of Isioma Daniel can be shed. It is abiding on all Muslims wherever they are to consider the killing of the writer as a religious duty."[1][5]

While the Nigerian government denounced the judgement as "unconstitutional"[1] and "null and void",[5] Muslim leaders were divided over its validity, some arguing that the subsequent retraction and apology meant that the fatwa was inappropriate.[5][7] Thus Lateef Adegbite, Secretary-General of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs, was quick to reject the death penalty since Daniel was not Muslim and the newspaper had apologised publicly.[8]

Exile in Europe[edit]

Isioma Daniel eventually went into exile in Europe, her resettlement guided by the Committee to Protect Journalists and Amnesty International.[4]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b c d e f Astill, James; Bowcott, Owen (November 27, 2002). "Fatwa is issued on Nigerian journalist". Guardian Unlimited. Retrieved 2007-07-21. 
  2. ^ a b Daniel, Isioma (December 9, 2004). "Naivety... the root of all evil". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on May 23, 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-21. 
  3. ^ "Talkabout Africa exclusive: Isioma Daniel has no regrets" (Press release). BBC. 13 March 2003. Retrieved 2007-07-21. 
  4. ^ a b c d Daniel, Isioma (February 17, 2003). "'I lit the match'". Guardian Unlimited. Retrieved 2007-07-21. 
  5. ^ a b c d "Nigerian Government rejects 'fatwa'". BBC News. 26 November 2002. Retrieved 2007-07-21. 
  6. ^ "Nigerian paper's apology". BBC News. 22 November 2002. Retrieved 2007-07-21. 
  7. ^ Somerville, Keith (27 November 2002). "Controversy over Nigerian fatwa". BBC News. Retrieved 2007-07-21. 
  8. ^ Weimann, Gunnar J. (2010). Islamic Criminal Law in Northern Nigeria : Politics, Religion, Judicial Practice. Amsterdam University Press. p. 152. ISBN 90-5629-655-8.