Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2011)|
|Outline of South Asian history|
Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent mainly took place from the 12th to the 16th centuries, though earlier Muslim conquests made limited inroads into modern Afghanistan and Pakistan as early as the time of the Rajput kingdoms in the 8th century. With the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate, Islam spread across large parts of the subcontinent. In 1204, Bakhtiar Khilji led the Muslim conquest of Bengal, marking the eastern-most expansion of Islam at the time.
Prior to the rise of the Maratha Empire which was followed by the conquest of India by the British East India Company, the Muslim Moghul Empire was able to annex or subjugate most of India's kings. However, it was never able to conquer the kingdoms in upper reaches of the Himalayas such as the regions of today's Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sikkim, Nepal and Bhutan and the extreme south of India such as Travancore and Tamil Nadu.
- 1 Background
- 2 Early Muslim communities
- 3 Rashidun Caliphate and the India Frontier
- 4 Umayyad Expansion in Al Hind
- 5 Al Hajjaj and the East
- 6 Umayyad expansion in Sindh
- 7 Last Umayyad campagins in Al Hind
- 8 Later Muslim invasions
- 9 Decline of Muslim rule in Indian subcontinent
- 10 Impact of Islam and Muslims in India
- 11 Iconoclasm
- 12 Ghazwa-e-Hind
- 13 See also
- 14 Bibliography
- 15 References
- 16 External links
Like other societies in history, South Asia has been attacked by nomadic tribes throughout its long history. In evaluating the impact of Islam on the sub-continent, one must also note that the northwestern sub-continent was a frequent target of tribes from Central Asia who arrived from the North West. With the fall of the Sassanids and the arrival of the Caliphate's domination of the region these tribes began to contest with the new power and were subsequently integrated into it giving rise to Muslim dynasties of Central Asian heritage, generally Turkics and Persians.[dubious ] In that sense, the Muslim invasions of the 10th century onwards were not dissimilar to those of the earlier invasions in the History of Central Asia during the 1st through to the 6th century.
What does however, make the Muslim invasions different is that unlike the preceding invaders who assimilated into the prevalent social system, the Muslim conquerors retained their Islamic identity and created new legal and administrative systems that challenged and usually superseded the existing systems of social conduct and ethics. They also introduced new cultural mores that in some ways were very different from the existing cultural codes. While this was often a source of friction and conflict, it should also be noted that there were also Muslim rulers, notably Akbar, who in much of their secular practice absorbed or accommodated local traditions.
Early Muslim communities
Islam in India existed in communities along the Arab coastal trade routes in Sindh, Bengal, Gujarat, Kerala, and Ceylon as soon as the religion originated and had early gained widespread acceptance in the Arabian Peninsula, being brought over by merchants, Sufis and missionaries, who oftentimes settled down and intermarried with the local women, adopting local customs. The first incursion by the new Muslim successor states of the Arab World occurred around 636 CE or 643 AD, during the Rashidun Caliphate,long before any Arab army reached the frontier of India by land.
Uthman b. Abul As Al Sakifi, governor of Bahrain and Oman, sent out ships to raid Thane, near modern-day Mumbai, while his brother Hakam sailed to Broach and a third fleet sailed to Debal under his younger brother Mughira either in 636 CE or 643 AD. According to one source all three expeditions were successful, however, another source states Mughira was defeated and killed at Debal. These expeditions were sent without the Caliph Umar's consent, and he rebuked Uthman, saying that had the Arabs lost any men the Caliph would have killed an equal number of men from Utham's tribe in retaliation. The expeditions were sent to attack pirate nests, to safeguard Arabian trade in the Arabian Sea, and not to start the conquest India.
Rashidun Caliphate and the India Frontier
The kingdoms of Kapisa-Gandhara, Zabulistan and Sind (which then held Makran), all of which were culturally and political part of India since ancient times, were known as "The Frontier of Al Hind". The first clash between ruler of an Indian kingdom and Arabs took place in 643 AD, when Arabs defeated Rutbil, King of Zabulistan in Sistan. Furthermore, an Arab army under the command Suhail b. Abdi and Hakam al Taghilbi had defeated an Indian army in the Battle of Rasil in 644 AD at the Indian Ocean sea coast. The Arabs marched up to the Indus River, then returned home as Caliph Umar ibn Al-Khattab denied them permission to cross the river or operate on Indian soil.
Gatekeepers of India
Under the leadership of Abdullah ibn Aamir, his general Rabi b. Ziyad Al Harithi attacked Sistan and took Zaranj and surrounding areas in 651 AD. Ahnaf ibn Qais conquered the Hepthalites of Herat in 652 AD and advanced up to Balkh by 653 AD. Arab conquests now bordered the Kingdoms of Kapisa, Zabul and Sind. The Arabs levied annual tributes on the newly captured areas, and leaving 4,000 men garrisons at Merv and Zaranj retired to Iraq instead of pushing on against the frontier of India. Caliph Uthman b. Affan sanctioned an attack against Makran in 652 AD, and sent a recon mission to Sind in 653 AD. The mission described Makran as inhospitable, and Caliph Uthman, probably assuming the country beyond as much worse, forbade any further incursions into India.
This was the beginning of the long struggle between the rulers of Kabul and Zabul against successive Arab governors of Sistan, Khurasan and Makran. The Kabul Shahi kings and Zunbils, their kinsmen, blocked access to the Khyber Pass and Gomal Pass routes to India from 643 to 870 AD, while modern Balochistan, Pakistan, comprising the areas of Kikan or Qiqanan, Nukan, Turan, Buqan, Qufs, Mashkey and Makran, would face several Arab expeditions between 661 - 711 AD. Arabs had established military garrisons at Merv, Zaranj and Bust to control Khurasan and Sistan and they launched several raids against these frontier lands, but repeated rebellions in Sistan and Khurasan between 653 - 691 AD diverted much of their military resources in regaining these provinces and away from expansion into Al Hind, and Muslim control of these areas ebbed and flowed repeatedly as a result until 870 AD. Arabs troops disliked being stationed in Makran, and was reluctant to campaign in Kabul and Zabulistan, the difficult terrain and underestimation of Zunbil's power, Arab strategy to extract tribute instead of systematic conquest, and the fierce resistance of Zunbils and Turki Shah stalled Arab progress repeatedly in the "Frontier Zone.
Umayyad Expansion in Al Hind
At the conclusion of the First Fitna, Muawiyah established Umayyad rule over the Arabs in 661 AD, and resumed expansion of the Muslim Empire. To reach Al Hind, Arabs had to either occupy Kapisa and Zabul, thus gaining access of the Khyber Pass and Gomal Passes, or subdue Balochistan (an arid region on the Iranian Plateau in Southwest Asia, presently split between Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan) and Sindh to reach Sind. After regaining control of Khurasan and Sistan by 663/665 AD, Arabs launched an invasion against Kapisa. Abdur Rahman b. Samurra besieged Kabul in 663 AD, while Haris b Marrah advanced against Kalat after marching through Fannazabur and Quandabil and moving through the Bolan Pass. King Chach of Sindh sent an army against the Arabs, the enemy blocked the mountain passes, Haris was killed and his army was annihilated.
While Kabul was under siege, Al Muhallab ibn Abi Suffrah took a detachment through the Khyber pass towards Multan in Southern Punjab in modern day Pakistan in 664 AD. He then pushed south into Kikan, and may have also raided Quandabil. Muhallab's expeditions were not aimed at conquest, and he returned with wealth and prisoners of war. Abdur Rahman took Kabul in 664 AD, then pushed south into the kingdom of Zunbil as far as Bust, before returning to Kabul to quell an uprising. Arabs under Abdullah b Sawar attacked Kikan in 665 AD, although initially successful, were ultimately forced to retreat.
Battles in Makran and Zabulistan
Caliph Muawiyah sanctioned attack on Kikan and Makran in 667 AD. Abdullah was to attack Kikan with 4,000 troops, while 1,000 troops were to attack Aramabil, and another 2,000 was to sail from Basra to Makran. Abdullah was defeated and killed in Kikan. Arab survivors retreated to Makran and under the command of Sinan b. Salamah managed to conquer parts of Makran including the Chagai area and establish a permanent base of operations. The Kingdom of Kapisa had been taken over by Turki Shahi King Barhatigin of Gandhara before 666 AD, who had also managed to install his brother as Zunbil in Zabulistan before 670 AD. Both kingdoms were temporary vassal of the Caliph before 670 AD. Zunbil and Turki Shahi King expelled all Arabs from their respective kingdoms by 670 AD, and Zunbil began assisting in organizing resistance in Makran.
Rashid b. Amr, the next governor of Makran, subdued Mashkey, fought successfully in Kikan, until his defeat and death near Pahraj in 671 AD, afte which Sinan b. Salamah governed Makran for the next two years. Sinan reduced Kikan, conquered Buqan and Quasder, but after his death in battle against the Meds in Budha region, Arabs lost most of the conquered territory in Makran by 673 AD. Munzir b. Jarood Al Abadi managed to garrison Kikan and conquer Buqan by 681 AD. He died an Quasder, and his successor, Ibn Harri Al Bahili, conducted several campaigns to secure Arab hold on Kikan, Makran and Buqan by 683 AD.
Arabs had invaded Zabul in 668 and again in 672 AD, Zunbil saw off both the invasions by agreeing to pay annual tribute. Abbad b. Ziyad had defeated Zunbil at Qandahar in 673 AD, then attacked Kikan and Qandabil, permanently occupying the areas south of the Helmand river. Zunbil again refused to pay tribute in 681 AD, and the invasion of Yazid b. Salm, Governor of Sistan, was routed and at Junzah, and Arabs had to pay 500,000 dirhams to ransom their prisoners. Zunbil latter attacked the Arabs in Sistan in 685 AD, advanced up to Zaranj, but was ultimately defeated and killed by Abd Al Aziz b. Abdullah, the Arab governor, who then invaded Zabulistan and imposed terms on the next Zunbil. Arabs next invaded Zabul in 693 AD, Zunbil again agreed to pay annual tribute, but provoked by increasing Arab demands, offered battle. The Arab army under Abdullah B. Umayyah was trapped and had to agree to terms dictated by Zunbil. At this point, Al Hajjaj became the governor of Iraq.
Al Hajjaj and the East
Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf Al Thaqifi, who had played a crucial role during the Second Fitna for the Umayyad cause, was appointed the governor of Iraq in 694 AD, further extended to Khurasan and Sistan in 697 AD. He was a ruthless man, causing the death of many Muslims who were opponents of the Umayyad Caliphs. He also forced many Arab and non-Arab Muslims to seek refuge in Zabul and Sind, as well as in Medina, then governed by the tolerant Umar ibn Abdul Aziz (Umar II). Al-Hajjaj resented this and had the Caliph dismiss Umar II from his post. But Zabul and Sindh were outside the caliphate and Al-Hajjaj could do little to pursue the refugees. Al-Hajjaj was also an expansionist. He sponsored Muslim expansion in Makran, Sistan, Transoxiana and Sind.
Campaigns in Makran
Al-Hajjaj appointed Said ibn Aslam as the governor of Makran, but he was killed by Arab rebels led by the brothers Muhammad and Muawiyah ibn Al-Harith of the Al-Ilafi clan. Al-Hajjaj next sent Muj'jah ibn Sir Al-Tamimi as the governor, who drove out the Alafi brothers[who?] and conquered Quandabil. However, after his death, the Alafi brothers retook Makran. Al-Hajjaj had to wait until 707 AD to deal with the problem, when Muhammad ibn Harun defeated and killed Muhammad Alafi, and his brother fled to take refuge from Raja Dahir of Sind. He advised Dahir in repelling an invasion from Zunbil in 707 AD.
Peace with Zabul
Ubaidullah ibn Abu Bakra, the governor of Sistan, led 20,000 men against Zunbil to avenge the defeat of Yazid, instructed by Al-Hajjaj to lay the kingdom to waste. Although initially successful, the Arabs were later trapped by the armies of Zunbil's Turki Shah near Kabul. Zunbil allowed the Arabs to depart after taking hostages and a ransom of 500,000 dirhams. 15,000 men were lost to hunger and thirst before reaching Bust, earning this force the epithet of the "Doomed Army".
Al-Hajjaj prepared the next expedition carefully. 20,000 troops each from Kufa and Basra were levied. Many Arabs from the noblest families joined up, and the troops were splendidly equipped at government expense. Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn al-Ash'ath, a scion of one of the leading Arab clans was appointed to lead the army, known as "Jaysh al Tawawis", the Peacock Army. Al-Ash'ath led a systematic campaign and conquered Zabulistan up to Qandahar. Zunbil was worsted in some encounters and offered to renew its tribute. Al-Ash'ath wanted to stop the campaign for the winter. However, Al-Hajjaj's insulting rebuke and the reluctance of the soldiers to remain in Sistan led to a mutiny. The mutiny put down by 704. Al-Hajjaj granted a 7-year truce to Zunbil, together with an exemption from tribute for that period.
Muhammad Alafi had fled to Sind with 500 followers and was given asylum by King Dahir, and he assisted Dahir to defeat an invasion by Zunbil. Hajjaj had demanded the extradition of Alafi, which King Dahir had refused.
Sindh was the wild frontier region of al-Hind, inhabited mostly by semi-nomadic tribes whose activities disturbed much of the Western Indian Ocean. T he operation of the Meds and others. Meds (a tribe of Scythians living in Sindh) had pirated upon Sassanid shipping in the past, from the mouth of the Tigris to the Sri Lankan coast, in their bawarij and now preying on Arab shipping from their bases at Kutch, Debal and Kathiawar. During Hajjaj's governorship, the Mids of Debal in one of their raids had kidnapped Muslim women travelling from Sri Lanka to Arabia, thus providing a casus belli against Sindh Raja Dahir Muslim sources insist that it was these persistent activities along increasingly important Indian trade routes by Debal pirates and others which forced the Arabs to subjugate the area, in order to control the seaports and maritime routes of which Sindh was the nucleus, as well as, the overland passage.
Umayyad expansion in Sindh
Hajjaj sent 6,000 men under Ubaidullah b. Nabhan to Debal, the Arab expedition was defeated and their commander was killed. Budail b. Tahfah led the next expedition, managed to defeat the army of Debal, but when Jai Singh, son of Dahir, arrived with 4,000 troops and 4 elephants, the combined forces of Sind defeated the Arabs, Budail falling in battle. According to Muslim historical accounts such as the Chach Nama, the nature of the expeditions was punitive, and in response to raids carried out by pirates on Arab shipping, operating around Debal. The allegation was made that the King of Sindh, Raja Dahir was responsible.
Conquest of Sindh
The third expedition was led by a 17-year-old Arabian chieftain named Muhammad bin Qasim, Nephew and Son-in-law of Hajjaj. Muhammad bin Qasim departed from Shiraz in 710 CE with 6,000 Syrian cavalry and detachments of mawali from Iraq. At the borders of Sindh he was joined by an advance guard and six thousand camel riders, and a baggage train of 3,000 camels. His Artillery of five catapults were sent to Debal by sea ("manjaniks"). The Army marched along the coast to Tiaz in Makran, then to the Kech valley. Muhammad re-subdue the restive towns of Fannazbur and Armabil, (Lasbela) finally completing the conquest of Makran. At Arman Belah Muhammad b. Harun, Governor of Makran, joined him with forces of Makran, and the army met up with the reinforcements and catapults sent by sea near Debal. The Arabs took Debal through assault.
From Debal the Arab army then marched north taking towns such as Nerun and Sadusan (Sehwan) peacefully. Muhammad fought battles against the tribes inhabiting Sisam near the Kumbh River, securing the area up to Budha region. King Dahir in the meantime had assembled his army at Rawar. In preparation to meet them, Muhammad bin Qasim moved back to Nerun to resupply and receive reinforcements sent by Hajjaj. Camped on the east bank of the Indus, Qasim sent emissaries and bargained with the river Jats and boatmen. Upon securing the aid of Mokah Basayah, "the King of the island of Bet", Muhammad bin Qasim crossed over the river where he was joined by the forces of the Thakore of Bhatta and the western Jats, after brushing aside the attempts of Jai Singh, son of Dahir and his forces to interfere. The army of Muhammad probably numbered 20,000 - 25000 men, while the Army of Sindh had 60 elephants and 20000 to 50000 soldiers. In the ensuing battle in June 712 AD, the Hindu army fled the field after Dahir was killed, 15,000 going to Rawar and others to Brahmanabad.
Arabs marched north after the siege and capture of Rawer. Brahmanabad, then Alor (Aror) and finally Multan, were captured alongside other in-between towns with only light Muslim casualties. Usually after a siege of a few weeks or months the Arabs gained a city through the intervention of heads of mercantile houses with whom subsequent treaties and agreements would be settled. After battles all fighting men were executed and their wives and children enslaved in considerable numbers and the usual fifth of the booty and slaves were sent to Hajjaj. The general populace was encouraged to carry on with their trades and taxes and tributes settled.
After the capture of Multan, Muhammad assembled an army of 50,000 soldiers, the essentially Arab army that had captured Sindh had been joined by Muslim volunteers, new converts and by the Gurjars and Meds as well as other irregulars Al-Hajjaj had promised the Governorship of China to the first Arab general to reach the land, the candidates being Qutaybah b. Muslim, then spearheading the Arab conquests across the Oxus and Muhammad b. Qasim, now master of Sindh and Southern Punjab. This may explain the expedition of Muhammad up to the foothills of Kashmir along the Jhelum in 713 AD, the attack on Al-Kiraj (probably the Kangra valley) and sending 10,000 cavalry to defeat the Army of Hara Chandra, King of Qinnauj (probably not Kanauj) near Udaypur on the banks of Ghaggar, 14 miles south of Alwana. Chandrapida, Karakota dynasty King of Kashmir, was alarmed enough by these activities to seek aid from Tang China in vain in 713 AD.
Hajjaj b. Yusuf died before Muhammad could commence any further operations, and Muhammad returned to Ar-rur (Rohri). Successful expeditions were sent to Al - Bailaman (probably Bhinmal) and Kutch, the Meds of Saurat and probably the Maitrakas of Valahbi paid tribute and concluded peace treaties. Caliph Al Walid died in 715 AD, had his brother Sulayman became caliph. He was an enemy of Hajjaj, who had supported Al Walid in his scheme to deny Sulayman the throne, furthermore, Sulayman had support of the Yamani Arabs, who were rivals of the Mudari Arabs, the clan of Hajjaj. Sulayman dismissed all the protégés of Hajjaj, Muhammad was deposed, arrested and imprisoned in Iraq, where he expired . His departure led to the temporary demise of Umayyad control of Sindh.
Jai Singh triumphs
Jai Singh, son of Dahir had been leading the resistance to Arab rule after the fall of Dahir. After his call for aid to other kings of North India fell on deaf ears, he first headed east from Sindh, then visited Zunbil. While Muhammad b. Qasim was busy in Makran, Qutaybah b. Muslim had led an expedition against Zunbil, who had forgotten to pay the annual tribute after the 7-year truce had ended. Both sides were reluctant to engage in battle and Zunbil agreed resumed payment of tribute. From Zabul Jai Singh returned to Sindh and started harassing the Arabs,
With Muhammad b. Qasim taken to Iraq, many Arabs left Sindh and no reinforcements were sent  while many converts renounced their new faith, and Jai Singh eventually managed to capture Brahmanabad, and soon the weakened Arabs were driven across the Indus. Habib b. Muhallab, new Arab governor managed to capture Al - Ror, and Amar b.Muslim Al Bahili had chased after Jaisingh up to Jalandhar in an futile attempt to suppress his activities, but Arab control was restricted to the Western shore of Indus. Umar II, who became caliph after the death of Sulaiman b. Abdul Malik in 717 AD, invited Jai Singh and other Hindu chieftains to accept Islam. Jai Singh and many other accepted Islam and was exempt from paying taxes. Sindh was briefly lost to the caliph when the rebel Yazid b. Muhallab took over Sindh briefly in 720 AD.,
Last Umayyad campagins in Al Hind
Junaid b. Abr Al Rahman Al Marri became the governor of Sindh in 723 AD. After arriving he first secured Dedal, then north marched up the Indus. Jai Singh refused the Arabs passage across the river as he deemed his kingdom independent of the Caliphate, Junaid in turn demanded Jai Singh pay the Jazya tax, which he refused on the ground he was a Muslim and not subject the Jazya. Hostilities ensued, both sides collected boats and a naval battle was fought in a swap. Jaisingh was defeated and executed, and Junaid soon secured Sindh and Southern Punjab. He then stormed Al Kiraj (Kangra valley) in 724 AD.
Expansion in South West Al Hind
Junaid next attacked a number of Hindu kingdoms in what is now Rajasthan, Gujrat and Madhya Pradesh aiming at permanent conquest, but the chronology and area of operation of the campaigns during 725 - 743 AD is difficult to follow because accurate, complete information is lacking. The Gurjara clans, headed by King Siluka of the Bhandi line ruled an area that included much of Rajashtan and Mewar, while a cadet branch, later to be named "Pratihara" ruled Nandol and parts of Malwa, including Ujjain, under Nagabhata I, and a third line was established at Broach under Jayabhata IV, who ruled as vassal of the Maitraka dynasty of Vallabhi. The Maitraka Kingdom, which at its zenith during 650 - 685 AD had encompassed Gujrat and areas in South Rajasthan and Malwa and had fought the Gurjaras and Chalukyas successfully, was now much reduced in territory and was ruled by Siladitya IV. Moriyas of Chittor were ruled by Manuraj, and together with their vassals, the Guhilas, held parts of Merwar and Malwa, while the Saindhavas, who were probably emigrants from Sindh to Kathiawar after 712 AD, had their capital at Bhurambilika and were ruled by Pushyadeva. The Cavotakas (also called Capotaka or Capa) were also associated with Kathiawar, with their capital at Anahilapataka. Saurashtra is south Kathiawar.
The Arabs moved east from Sindh in several detachments and probably from attacked from both the land and the sea. King Siluka repelled Arabs from "Stravani and Valla", probably the area North of Jaisalmer and Jodhpur, but areas to the South fell to the Arabs, as Mirmad (Marumada, in Jaisalmer), Al-Mandal (perhaps Oka-Mandal in Gujarat) or Marwar, and Dahnaj, not identified, were occupied by Junaids army. The seaborne force probably attacked Barwas (Broach), then sacked Vallabhi and despoiled the temple of Somnath, while Junaid personally conquered al-Baylaman (Bhilmal) and Jurz (Gurjara country—north Gujarat and southern Rajasthan). After consolidating the gains, Junaid sent Habib b Murra with an army east to operate in the country of al-Malibah (Malwa). The Arabs overran the country, then approached Uzayn (Ujjain), the capital of Malwa, burned the suburbs of Brahrimad, but were ultimately defeated by Nagabhata I in 725 AD. Part of the Gurjara holdings of Siluka and Nagabhata remained safe from Arab occupation as a result of their victories, while Junaid appointed tax collectors in the newly conquered areas, and fixed a base of operations before returning to Sindh. The spoils of the campaign amounted to 80 million dirhams, half were sent to the Caliph, Junaid distributed generously to his troops and in 729 AD was sent to Khurasan as Governor.
Collapse of Umayyad Control
When Tamim b. Zaid Al Utbi replaced Junaid as governor in Sindh in 730 AD, the situation in Sindh and Umayyad controlled areas of Al Hind was peaceful enough, as he emptied the treasury by distributing 18 million dirhams to the soldiers, and allowed some troops to go home. The situation then worsened, Arab tribal infighting flared up, Arab soldiers deserted their garrisons in the newly conquered territory and their main base and left, Indian rulers begain to reclaim their lands, probably aided by Nagabhata I, The Chalukyas and Yasovarman of Kanauj. Finally, rebellion broke out in Sind and Punjab, and after a number of battles Arab position in Al Hind totally collapsed. Tamim abandoned Dedal and fled west across the Indus, and drowned in a watering hole, with the remaining Arabs of Sindh were clinging to Kutch and a few forts in Sindh.
Al Hakam and partial recovery
Al Hakam b. Awana Al Kalbi reached his post in Sindh to find Muslims had been literally driven to the sea and were hanging on to some places in Kutch and the coast to Debal. Hakam landed in Kutch and rescued the Arab force, then moved west to Sind. Hakam was a Yamani Arab (Southern or Himar clan), and to avoid tribal strife, he appointed Amr, son of Muhammad b. Qasim (A Norther or Mudar/Qais clansman) as his deputy. A campaign to recover Sindh was concluded successfully, an the end of which, in c733 AD, Al Hakam founded the garrison city of Al Mahfuza ("The Well Guarded") similar to Kufa, Basra and Wasit, on the eastern side of a lake near Brahmanabad. Hakam sent an expedition in Northern Punjab, but this was checked by the alliance of Lalitaditya Muktapida and Yasovarman of Kanauj, the same alliance which had checked Tibetan aggression between 730 - 735 AD.
Hakam next attempted to reclaim the conquests of Junaid in Al Hind. Arab records merely state that he was successful, Indian records at Navasari details that Arab forces defeated "Kacchella, Saindhava, Saurashtra, Cavotaka, Maurya and Gurjara" kings. It would seem Hakam did not seek to occupy Mermad or Malibah. One Arab army was defeated by Jayabhata IV of the Gurjars of Broach at Vallabhi in 736 AD. This probably caused rebellion in the newly won territories and in Sindh. Hakam sent Amr b. Muhammad b. Qasim to deal with the crisis and requested reinforcements from Damascus. The Caliph could only spare 600 Syrian troops, who chose to remain in Iraq instead of coming to Sindh. Amr managed to pacify the rebels, and upon his return, founded the city of Al Mansura ("The Victorious") near Al Mahfuza to commemorate his success.
Al Hakam next invaded the Deccan in 739 AD with the intention of permanent conquest, but was decisively defeated at Navsari by the viceroy Avanijanashraya Pulakesi of the Chalukya Empire serving Vikramaditya II. This was documented in a Navsari grant of 738-739 AD where Pulakesi is said to have defeated a Tajika (Arab) army that had attacked Pulakesi subsequently received the titles "Solid Pillar of Dakshinapatha" (Deccan) and the "Repeller of the Unrepellable." After this defeat Arabs began to lose ground as the activities of the Chalukyas, Nagabhata I, Bappa Rawal and Dantidurga pushed them west towards Sindh. Al Hakam died fighting the Meds in Saurat in 740 AD. Amr b. Muhammad became the governor, but he also lost ground and was besieged at Al Mansurah by rebels. The arrival of 4,000 Iraqi troops enabled him to defeat the Hindu army and restore Arab control of Sindh, but the conquests of Junaid and Hakam were lost forever.
Last days of Umayyad Control
Zunbil had stopped paying tribute after the death of Hajjaj in 714 AD, and activities of the Kharijis in Sistan, where they killed a number of Arab commanders, and the battles between Banu Bakr and Banu Tamim had rendered the governors of Sistan powerless to mount any expedition. The situation improved by 728 AD, and Ashaf b. Abd Allah Al Kalabi invaded Zabul. Zunbil retreated after losing a series of battles, then trapped the Arabs army, which had to conduct a fighting withdrawal back to Bust. Zunbil was not troubled by Arabs until 768 AD.
Sindh had remained restless under the Umayyads, after Arm b. Muhammad had pacified the province during 740 - 744 AD, Al Walid had to lead 18 campaigns to secure the Caliph's hold on Sindh. The last Umayyad Governor of Sindh, Mansur b. Jumhoor rebelled in 746 AD, detaching the province from Caliph's domain. When the Abbasid dynasty overthrew the Umayyads in 750 after the Third Fitna, Mansoor defeated and killed Abdur Rahman, who was sent to govern Sindh by Abu Muslim. The next Abbasid governor, Musa b. K'ab al Tamimi, managed to defeat Mansur and secure the province in 752 AD.
Fragmentation of Arab Rule
Caliphates rule in South Asia shrank to Sindh and Southern Punjab and in 871, a number of smaller states separated from the Caliphate, the principal of whom were Al Mansura and Multan, further weakening Muslim control in India.
Ismaili missionaries found a receptive audience among both the Sunni and non-Muslim populations here. Multan became a center of the Ismaili sect of Islam, which still has many adherents in Sindh today. This region under generous patronage of the arts provided a conduit for Arab scholars to absorb and expand on Indian sciences and pass them onwards to the West.In 985, a group around Multan declared themselves an independent Ismaili Fatimid State.
Later Muslim invasions
Muslim incursions resumed under later Turkic and Central Asian Mongol dynasties with more local capitals, who supplanted the Caliphate and expanded their domains both northwards and eastwards and led to the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate.
Under Sabuktigin, Ghazni found itself in conflict with the Shahi Raja Jayapala. When Sabuktigin died and his son Mahmud ascended the throne in 998, Ghazni was engaged in the North with the Qarakhanids when the Shahi Raja renewed hostilities.
In the early 11th century, Mahmud of Ghazni launched seventeen expeditions into South Asia. In 1001, Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni defeated Raja Jayapala of the Hindu Shahi Dynasty of Gandhara (in modern Afghanistan), the Battle of Peshawar and marched further into Peshawar (in modern Pakistan) and, in 1005, made it the center for his forces.
The Ghaznavid conquests were initially directed against the Ismaili Fatimids of Multan, who were engaged in an ongoing struggle with the Abbasid Caliphate in conjunction with their compatriots of the Fatimid Caliphate in North Africa and the Middle East; Mahmud apparently hoped to curry the favor of the Abbasids in this fashion. However, once this aim was accomplished, he moved onto the richness of the loot of wealthy temples and monasteries. By 1027, Mahmud had captured parts of North India and obtained formal recognition of Ghazni's sovereignty from the Abbassid Caliph, al-Qadir Billah.
Ghaznavid rule in Northwestern India (modern Afghanistan and Pakistan) lasted over 175 years, from 1010 to 1187. It was during this period that Lahore assumed considerable importance apart from being the second capital, and later the only capital, of the Ghaznavid Empire.
At the end of his reign, Mahmud's empire extended from Kurdistan in the west to Samarkand in the Northeast, and from the Caspian Sea to the Punjab. Although his raids carried his forces across Northern and Western India, only Punjab came under his permanent rule; Kashmir, the Doab, Rajasthan, and Gujarat remained under the control of the local Indian dynasties. But Mahmud of Ghazni never met on the battlefield Emperor Raja Raja Chola I and Emperor Rajendra Chola I of the Chola empire which was the most powerful Empire of India at that time.
In 1030, Mahmud fell gravely ill and died at age 59. He had been a gifted military commander.
Mu'izz al-Din better known as Shahāb-ud-Din Muhammad Ghori was a conqueror from the region of Ghor in Afghanistan. Before 1160, the Ghaznavid Empire covered an area running from central Afghanistan east to the Punjab, with capitals at Ghazni on the banks of Ghazni river in present-day Afghanistan, and at Lahore in present-day Pakistan. In 1160, the Ghorids conquered Ghazni from the Ghaznavids, and in 1173 Muhammad Bin Sām was made governor of Ghazni. He raided eastwards into the remaining Ghaznavid territory, and invaded Gujarat in the 1180s but was defeated by the Indian queen Naikidevi of Gujarat. In 1186 and 1187 he conquered Lahore in alliance with a local Hindu ruler, ending the Ghaznavid empire and bringing the last of Ghaznavid territory under his control, and seemed to be the first Muslim ruler seriously interested in expanding his domain in the sub-continent, and like his predecessor Mahmud initially started off against the Ismaili kingdom of Multan that had regained independence during the Nizari conflicts, and then onto booty and power.
In 1191, he invaded the territory of Prithviraj III of Ajmer, who ruled much of present-day Rajasthan and Punjab, but was defeated at Tarain by Prithviraj. The following year, Mu'izz al-Din assembled 120,000 horsemen and once again invaded India. Mu'izz al-Din's army met Prithviraj's army again at Tarain, and this time Mu'izz al-Din won; Govindraj was slain, Prithviraj executed and Mu'izz al-Din advanced onto Delhi. Within a year, Mu'izz al-Din controlled Northern Rajasthan and Northern Ganges-Yamuna Doab. After these victories in India, and Mu'izz al-Din's establishment of a capital in Delhi, Multan was also incorporated into his empire. Mu'izz al-Din then returned east to Ghazni to deal with the threat on his eastern frontiers from the Turks and Mongols, whiles his armies continued to advance through Northern India, raiding as far east as Bengal.
Mu'izz al-Din returned to Lahore after 1200. In 1206, Mu'izz al-Din had to travel to Lahore to crush a revolt. On his way back to Ghazni, his caravan rested at Damik near Sohawa (which is near the city of Jhelum in the Punjab province of modern-day Pakistan). He was assassinated on 15 March 1206, while offering his evening prayers. The identity of Ghori's assassins is disputed, with some claiming that he was assassinated by local Hindu Gakhars and others claiming he was assassinated by Hindu Khokhars, both being different tribes.
The Khokhars were killed in large numbers, and the province was pacified. After settling the affairs in the Punjab. Mu'izz al-Din marched back to Ghazni. While camping at Dhamayak in 1206 AD in the Jehlum district, the sultan was murdered by the Khokhars
Hasan Nizami and Ferishta record the killing of Mu'izz al-Din at the hands of the Gakhars. However, Ferishta may have confused the Ghakars with the Khokhars. Other historians have also blamed Shahabuddin Ghori's assassination to a band of Hindu Khokhars.
According to his wishes, Mu'izz al-Din was buried where he fell, in Damik. Upon his death his most capable general, Qutb-ud-din Aybak, took control of Mu'izz al-Din's Indian conquests and declared himself the first Sultan of Delhi.
The Delhi Sultanate
Muhammad's successors established the first dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate, while the Mamluk Dynasty in 1211 (however, the Delhi Sultanate is traditionally held to have been founded in 1206) seized the reins of the empire. Mamluk means "slave" and referred to the Turkic slave soldiers who became rulers. The territory under control of the Muslim rulers in Delhi expanded rapidly. By mid-century, Bengal and much of central India was under the Delhi Sultanate. Several Turko-Afghan dynasties ruled from Delhi: the Mamluk (1206–1290), the Khalji (1290–1320), the Tughlaq (1320–1414), the Sayyid (1414–51), and the Lodhi (1451–1526). During the time of Delhi Sultanate, the Vijayanagara Empire resisted successfully attempts of Delhi Sultanate to establish dominion in the Southern India, serving as a barrier against invasion by the Muslims. Certain kingdoms remained independent of Delhi such as the larger kingdoms of Punjab, Rajasthan, parts of the Deccan, Gujarat, Malwa (central India), and Bengal, nevertheless all of the area in present-day Pakistan came under the rule of Delhi.
The Sultans of Delhi enjoyed cordial, if superficial, relations with Muslim rulers in the Near East but owed them no allegiance. They based their laws on the Quran and the sharia and permitted non-Muslim subjects to practice their religion only if they paid the jizya (poll tax). They ruled from urban centres, while military camps and trading posts provided the nuclei for towns that sprang up in the countryside.
Perhaps the most significant contribution of the Sultanate was its temporary success in insulating the subcontinent from the potential devastation of the Mongol invasion from Central Asia in the 13th century, which nonetheless led to the capture of Afghanistan and western Pakistan by the Mongols (see the Ilkhanate Dynasty). The Sultanate ushered in a period of Indian cultural renaissance, The resulting "Indo-Muslim" fusion left lasting monuments in architecture, music, literature, and religion. In addition it is surmised that the language of Urdu (literally meaning "horde" or "camp" in various Turkic dialects) was born during the Delhi Sultanate period as a result of the mingling of Sanskritic Hindi and the Persian, Turkish, Arabic favoured by the Muslim invaders of India.
The Sultanate suffered significantly from the sacking of Delhi in 1398 by Timur, but revived briefly under the Lodi Dynasty, the final dynasty of the Sultanate before it was conquered by Zahiruddin Babur in 1526, who subsequently founded the Mughal Dynasty that ruled from the 16th to the 18th centuries.
Tīmūr bin Taraghay Barlas, known in the West as Tamerlane or "Timur the lame", was a 14th-century warlord of Turco-Mongol descent, conqueror of much of western and central Asia, and founder of the Timurid Empire (1370–1507) in Central Asia; the Timurid dynasty survived until 1857 as the Mughal dynasty of India.
Informed about civil war in South Asia, Timur began a trek starting in 1398 to invade the reigning Sultan Nasir-u Din Mehmud of the Tughlaq Dynasty in the north Indian city of Delhi. His campaign was politically pretexted that the Muslim Delhi Sultanate was too tolerant toward its "Hindu" subjects, but that could not mask the real reason being to amass the wealth of the Delhi Sultanate.
Timur crossed the Indus River at Attock (now Pakistan) on 24 September. The capture of towns and villages was often followed by the looting, massacre of their inhabitants and raping of their women, as well as pillaging to support his massive army. Timur wrote many times in his memoirs of his specific disdain for the 'idolatrous' "Hindus".
Timur's invasion did not go unopposed and he did meet some resistance during his march to Delhi, most notably with the Sarv Khap coalition in northern India, and the Governor of Meerut. Although impressed and momentarily stalled by the valour of Ilyaas Awan, Timur was able to continue his relentless approach to Delhi, arriving in 1398 to combat the armies of Sultan Mehmud, already weakened by an internal battle for ascension within the royal family.
The Sultan's army was easily defeated on 17 December 1398. Timur entered Delhi and the city was sacked, destroyed, and left in ruins. Before the battle for Delhi, Timur executed more than 100,000 "Hindu" captives.
Timur himself recorded the invasions in his memoirs, collectively known as Tuzk-i-Timuri. Timur's purported autobiography, the Tuzk-e-Taimuri ("Memoirs of Temur") is a later fabrication, although most of the historical facts are accurate.
Historian Irfan Habib writes in "Timur in the Political Tradition and Historiography of Mughal India" that in the 14th century, the word "Hindu" (people of "Al-Hind", "Hind" being "India") included "both Hindus and Muslims" in religious connotations.
When Timur entered Delhi after defeating Mahmud Toghloq’s forces, he granted an amnesty in return for protection money (mâl-e amâni). But on the fourth day he ordered that all the people of the city be enslaved; and so they were. Thus reports Yahya, who here inserts a pious prayer in Arabic for the victims’ consolation ("To God we return, and everything happens by His will"). Yazdi, on the other hand, does not have any sympathy to waste on these wretches. He records that Timur had granted protection to the people of Delhi on the 18th of December 1398, and the collectors had begun collecting the protection money. But large groups of Timur’s soldiers began to enter the city and, like birds of prey, attacked its citizens. The "pagan Hindus" (Henduân-e gabr) having had the temerity to begin immolating their women and themselves, the three cities of Delhi were put to sack by Timur’s soldiers. "Faithless Hindus", he adds, had gathered in the Congregation Mosque of Old Delhi and Timur’s officers put them ruthlessly to slaughter there on the 29th of December. Clearly, Yazdi’s "Hindus" included Muslims as well.
Timur's memoirs on his invasion of India describe in detail the massacre of "Hindus", looting plundering and raping of their women and the plunder of the wealth of Hindustan (Greater India). It gives details of how villages, towns and entire cities were rid of their "Hindu" male population through systematic mass slaughters and genocide.
Timur left Delhi in approximately January 1399. In April he had returned to his own capital beyond the Oxus (Amu Darya). Immense quantities of spoils were taken from India. According to Ruy Gonzáles de Clavijo, 90 captured elephants were employed merely to carry precious stones looted from his conquest, so as to erect a mosque at Samarkand — what historians today believe is the enormous Bibi-Khanym Mosque. Ironically, the mosque was constructed too quickly and suffered greatly from disrepair within a few decades of its construction.
The Mughal Empire
India in the 16th century presented a fragmented picture of rulers, both Muslim and Hindu, who lacked concern for their subjects and failed to create a common body of laws or institutions. Outside developments also played a role in shaping events. The circumnavigation of Africa by the Portuguese explorer Vasco da Gama in 1498 allowed Europeans to challenge Muslim control of the trading routes between Europe and Asia. In Central Asia and Afghanistan, shifts in power pushed Babur of Ferghana (in present-day Uzbekistan) southward, first to Kabul and then to India. The dynasty he founded endured for more than three centuries.
Bairam Khan ordered his troops to erect a "Beheaded Skulls Tower" after the Second Battle of Panipat.
Rajput women commit Jauhar during Akbar's invasion.
A War elephant executing the opponents of the Mughal Emperor Akbar.
Claiming descent from both Genghis Khan and Timur, Babur combined strength and courage with a love of beauty, and military ability with cultivation. He concentrated on gaining control of Northwestern India, doing so in 1526 by defeating the last Lodhi Sultan at the First battle of Panipat, a town north of Delhi. Babur then turned to the tasks of persuading his Central Asian followers to stay on in India and of overcoming other contenders for power, mainly the Rajputs and the Afghans. He succeeded in both tasks but died shortly thereafter in 1530. The Mughal Empire was one of the largest centralised states in premodern history and was the precursor to the British Indian Empire.
Babur was followed by his great-grandson, Shah Jahan (r. 1628–58), builder of the Taj Mahal and other magnificent buildings. Two other towering figures of the Mughal era were Akbar (r. 1556–1605) and Aurangzeb (r. 1658–1707). Both rulers expanded the empire greatly and were able administrators. However, Akbar was known for his religious tolerance and administrative genius while Aurangzeb was a pious Muslim and fierce advocate of more orthodox Islam.
While some rulers were zealous in their spread of Islam, others were relatively liberal. Moghul emperor Akbar was relatively liberal and established a new religion, Din E Elahi, which included beliefs from different religions. He abolished the jizya twice. In contrast, his great-grandson Aurangazeb was a more religious and orthodox ruler .
In the century-and-a-half that followed the death of Aurangzeb, effective Muslim control weakened. Succession to imperial and even provincial power, which had often become hereditary, was subject to intrigue and force. The mansabdari system gave way to the zamindari system, in which high-ranking officials took on the appearance of hereditary landed aristocracy with powers of collecting rents. As Delhi's control waned, other contenders for power emerged and clashed, thus preparing the way for the eventual British takeover.
Ahmed Shah Abdali – a Pashtun – embarked on an invasion of conquest in South Asia starting in 1747. In the short space of just over a quarter of a century, he forged one of the largest Muslim empires of the 18th century. The high point of his conquests was his victory over the powerful Marathas in the third Battle of Panipat 1761. In South Asia his empire stretched from the Indus at Attock all the way to the outskirts of Delhi. Uninterested in long term of conquest or in replacing the Mughal Empire, he became increasingly pre occupied with revolts by the Sikhs. His empire started to unravel not long after his death.
Decline of Muslim rule in Indian subcontinent
There is no doubt that the single most important power to emerge in the long twilight of the Mughal dynasty was the Maratha Confederacy (1674 CE - 1818 CE). The Marathas are responsible, to a large extent, for ending Mughal rule in India. The Maratha Empire ruled large parts of India following the decline of the Mughals. The long and futile war bankrupted one of the most powerful empires in the world. Mountstart Elphinstone termed this a demoralizing period for the Mussalmans as many of them lost the will to fight against the Maratha Empire. Maratha empire at its peak was stretched from Tamil Nadu (Trichinopoly) "present Tiruchirappalli" in the south to the Afghan border in the north. In early 1771, Mahadji, a notable Maratha general, recaptured Delhi and installed Shah Alam II as the puppet ruler on the Mughal throne. In north India, the Marathas thus regained the territory and the prestige lost as result of the defeat at Panipath in 1761. Mahadji ruled the Punjab as it used to be a Mughal territory and Sikh sardars and other Rajas of the cis-Sutlej region paid tributes to him. A considerable portion of the Indian subcontinent came under the sway of the British Empire after the Third Anglo-Maratha War, which ended the Maratha Empire in 1818.
In northwest India, in the Punjab, Sikhs developed themselves into a powerful force under the authority of twelve Misls. By 1801, Ranjit Singh captured Lahore and threw off the Afghan yoke from North West India. In Afghanistan Zaman Shah Durrani was defeated by powerful Barakzai chief Fateh Khan who appointed Mahmud Shah Durrani as the new ruler of Afghanistan and appointed himself as Wazir of Afghanistan. Sikhs however were now superior to the Afghans and started to annex Afghan provinces. The biggest victory of the Sikh Empire over the Durrani Empire came in the Battle of Attock fought in 1813 between Sikh and Wazir of Afghanistan Fateh Khan and his younger brother Dost Mohammad Khan. The Afghans were routed by the Sikh army and the Afghans lost over 9,000 soldiers in this battle. Dost Mohammad was seriously injured whereas his brother Wazir Fateh Khan fled back to Kabul fearing that his brother was dead. In 1818 they slaughtered Afghans and Muslims in trading city of Multan killing Afghan governor Nawab Muzzafar Khan and five of his sons in the Siege of Multan. In 1819 the last Indian Province of Kashmir was conquered by Sikhs who registered another crushing victory over weak Afghan General Jabbar Khan. The Koh-i-Noor diamond was also taken by Maharaja Ranjit Singh in 1814. In 1823 a Sikh Army routed Dost Mohammad Khan the Sultan of Afghanistan and his brother Azim Khan at Naushera (Near Peshawar). By 1834 the Sikh Empire extended up to the Khyber Pass. Hari Singh Nalwa the Sikh general remained the governor of Khyber Agency till his death in 1837. He consolidated Sikh hold in tribal provinces. The northernmost Indian territories of Gilgit, Baltistan and Ladakh was annexed between 1831-1840.
Impact of Islam and Muslims in India
According to historian Will Durant, "The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history". By the estimate of Koenraad Elst the population of Indian subcontinent reduced by almost 80 million between 1000 and 1525. In course of their conquests and rule in India, the number of Muslims in India increased through Immigration and Conversion. The Ancient Indian Kingdoms in Afghanistan and Pakistan became Muslim majority areas, as did the Eastern Part of Bengal. This would ultimately lead to the Partition of India in 1947 after the end of British rule.
- Conversion was a combination, initially by violence, threat or other pressure against the person.
- As a socio-cultural process of diffusion and integration over an extended period of time into the sphere of the dominant Muslim civilization and global polity at large.
- That conversions occurred for non-religious reasons of pragmatism and patronage such as social mobility among the Muslim ruling elite
- That the bulk of Muslims are descendants of migrants from the Iranians or Arabs.
- Conversion was a result of the actions of Sufi saints and involved a genuine change of heart.
An estimate of the number of people killed remains unknown. Based on the Muslim chronicles and demographic calculations, an estimate was done by K.S. Lal in his book Growth of Muslim Population in Medieval India, who claimed that between 1000 CE and 1500 CE, the population of Hindus decreased by 80 million. Although this estimate was disputed by Simon Digby in (School of Oriental and African Studies), Digby suggested that estimate lacks accurate data in pre-census times. In particular the records kept by al-Utbi, Mahmud al-Ghazni's secretary, in the Tarikh-i-Yamini document several episodes of bloody military campaigns. Hindus who converted to Islam however were not completely immune to persecution due to the caste system among Muslims in India established by Ziauddin al-Barani in the Fatawa-i Jahandari, where they were regarded as an "Ajlaf" caste and subjected to discrimination by the "Ashraf" castes.
Critics of the "religion of the sword theory" point to the presence of the strong Muslim communities found in Southern India, modern day Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, western Burma, Indonesia and the Philippines coupled with the distinctive lack of equivalent Muslim communities around the heartland of historical Muslim empires in South Asia as refutation to the "conversion by the sword theory". The legacy of Muslim conquest of South Asia is a hotly debated issue even today. Not all Muslim invaders were simply raiders. Later rulers fought on to win kingdoms and stayed to create new ruling dynasties. The practices of these new rulers and their subsequent heirs (some of whom were borne of Hindu wives of Muslim rulers) varied considerably. While some were uniformly hated, others developed a popular following. According to the memoirs of Ibn Battuta who traveled through Delhi in the 14th century, one of the previous sultans had been especially brutal and was deeply hated by Delhi's population. His memoirs also indicate that Muslims from the Arab world, Persia and Turkey were often favored with important posts at the royal courts suggesting that locals may have played a somewhat subordinate role in the Delhi administration. The term "Turk" was commonly used to refer to their higher social status. However S.A.A. Rizvi points to Muhammad bin Tughlaq as not only encouraging locals but promoting artisan groups such as cooks, barbers and gardeners to high administrative posts. In his reign, it is likely that conversions to Islam took place as a means of seeking greater social mobility and improved social standing.[better source needed]
Expansion of trade
Islam's impact was the most notable in the expansion of trade. The first contact of Muslims with India was the Arab attack on a nest of pirates near modern-day Mumbai to safeguard their trade in the Arabian Sea. Around the same time many Arabs settled at Indian ports, giving rise to small Muslim communities. The growth of these communities was not only due to conversion but also the fact that many Hindu kings of south India (such as those from Cholas) hired Muslims as mercenaries.
A significant aspect of the Muslim period in world history was the emergence of Islamic Sharia courts capable of imposing a common commercial and legal system that extended from Morocco in the West to Mongolia in the North East and Indonesia in the South East. While southern India was already in trade with Arabs/Muslims, northern India found new opportunities. As the Hindu and Buddhist kingdoms of Asia were subjugated by Islam, and as Islam spread through Africa – it became a highly centralising force that facilitated in the creation of a common legal system that allowed letters of credit issued in say Egypt or Tunisia to be honoured in India or Indonesia (The Sharia has laws on the transaction of business with both Muslims and non-Muslims). In order to cement their rule, Muslim rulers initially promoted a system in which there was a revolving door between the clergy, the administrative nobility and the mercantile classes. The travels of explorer Muhammad Ibn-Abdullah Ibn-Batuta were eased because of this system. He served as an Imam in Delhi, as a judicial official in the Maldives, and as an envoy and trader in the Malabar. There was never a contradiction in any of his positions because each of these roles complemented the other. Islam created a compact under which political power, law and religion became fused in a manner so as to safeguard the interests of the mercantile class. This led world trade to expand to the maximum extent possible in the medieval world. Sher Shah Suri took initiatives in improvement of trade by abolishing all taxes which hindered progress of free trade. He built large networks of roads and constructed Grand Trunk Road (1540–1544), which connects Chittagong to Kabul. Parts of it are still in use today. The geographic regions add to the diversity of languages and politics.
The divide and rule policies, two-nation theory, and subsequent partition of India in the wake of Independence from the British Empire has polarised the sub-continental psyche, making objective assessment hard in comparison to the other settled agricultural societies of India from the North West. Muslim rule differed from these others in the level of assimilation and syncretism that occurred. They retained their identity and introduced legal and administrative systems that superseded existing systems of social conduct and ethics. While this was a source of friction it resulted in a unique experience the legacy of which is a Muslim community strongly Islamic in character while at the same time distinctive and unique among its peers.
The impact of Islam on Indian culture has been inestimable. It permanently influenced the development of all areas of human endeavour – language, dress, cuisine, all the art forms, architecture and urban design, and social customs and values. Conversely, the languages of the Muslim invaders were modified by contact with local languages, to Urdu, which uses the Arabic script. This language was also known as Hindustani, an umbrella term used for the vernacular terminology of Hindi as well as Urdu, both major languages in South Asia today derived primarily from Sanskrit grammatical structures and vocabulary.
Muslim rule saw a greater urbanisation of India and the rise of many cities and their urban cultures. The biggest impact was upon trade resulting from a common commercial and legal system extending from Morocco to Indonesia. This change of emphasis on mercantilism and trade from the more strongly centralised governance systems further clashed with the agricultural based traditional economy and also provided fuel for social and political tensions.
A related development to the shifting economic conditions was the establishment of Karkhanas, or small factories and the import and dissemination of technology through India and the rest of the world. The use of ceramic tiles was adopted from architectural traditions of Iraq, Iran, and Central Asia. Rajasthan's blue pottery was a local variation of imported Chinese pottery. There is also the example of Sultan Abidin (1420–70) sending Kashmiri artisans to Samarqand to learn book-binding and paper making. Khurja and Siwan became renowned for pottery, Moradabad for brass ware, Mirzapur for carpets, Firozabad for glass wares, Farrukhabad for printing, Sahranpur and Nagina for wood-carving, Bidar and Lucknow for bidriware, Srinagar for papier-mache, Benaras for jewellery and textiles, and so on. On the flip-side encouraging such growth also resulted in higher taxes on the peasantry.
Numerous Indian scientific and mathematical advances and the Hindu numerals were spread to the rest of the world and much of the scholarly work and advances in the sciences of the age under Muslim nations across the globe were imported by the liberal patronage of Arts and Sciences by the rulers. The languages brought by Islam were modified by contact with local languages leading to the creation of several new languages, such as Urdu, which uses the modified Arabic script, but with more Persian words. The influences of these languages exist in several dialects in India today.
Islamic and Mughal architecture and art is widely noticeable in India, examples being the Taj Mahal and Jama Masjid. At the same time, Muslim rulers destroyed most of the ancient Indian architectural marvels and converted them into Islamic structures, most notably at Varanasi, Mathura, Ayodhya and the Kutub Complex in New Delhi.
In 1193, the Nalanda University complex was destroyed by Afghan Khilji-Ghilzai Muslims under Bakhtiyar Khalji; this event is seen as the final milestone in the decline of Buddhism in India. He also burned Nalanda's major Buddhist library and Vikramshila University, as well as numerous Bhuddhist monasteries in India. When the Tibetan translator, Chag Lotsawa Dharmasvamin (Chag Lo-tsa-ba, 1197–1264), visited northern India in 1235, Nalanda was damaged, looted, and largely deserted, but still standing and functioning with seventy students.
Mahabodhi, Sompura, Vajrasan and other important monasteries were found to be untouched. The Ghuri ravages only afflicted those monasteries that lay in the direct of their advance and were fortified in the manner of defensive forts.
By the end of the 12th century, following the Muslim conquest of the Buddhist stronghold in Bihar, Buddhism, having already declined in the South, declined in the North as well because survivors retreated to Nepal, Sikkim and Tibet or escaped to the South of the Indian sub-continent.
The city flourished between the 14th century and 16th century, during the height of the Vijayanagar Empire. During this time, it was often in conflict with the kingdoms which rose in the Northern Deccan, and which are often collectively termed the Deccan Sultanates. The Vijaynagar Empire successfully resisted Muslim invasions for centuries. But in 1565, the empire's armies suffered a massive and catastrophic defeat at the hands of an alliance of the Sultanates, and the capital was taken. The victorious armies then razed, depopulated and destroyed the city over several months. The empire continued its slow decline, but the original capital was not reoccupied or rebuilt.
The first temple of Somnath existed before the beginning of the common era.
The second temple, built by the Maitraka kings of Vallabhi in Gujarat, replaced the first one on the same site around 649. In 725 Junayad, the Arab governor of Sind, sent his armies to destroy the second temple.
The Pratihara king Nagabhata II constructed the third temple in 815, a large structure of red sandstone. Mahmud of Ghazni attacked this temple in 1026, looted its gems and precious stones, massacred the worshippers and burned it. It was then that the famous Shivalinga of the temple was entirely destroyed.
The fourth temple was built by the Paramara King Bhoj of Malwa and the Solanki king Bhimdev I of Gujarat (Anhilwara) between 1026 and 1042. The temple was razed in 1297 when the Sultanate of Delhi conquered Gujarat, and again in 1394. Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb destroyed the temple again in 1706.
Ghazwa-e-Hind or the final battle of India is an Islamic term mentioned in some hadiths predicting a final and last battle in India and as a result, a conquest of the whole Indian sub-continent by Muslim warriors. The term has recently become a subject of vast criticism in media for being used by the extremist Taliban organization Al-Qaeda to justify their terrorising activities in the subcontinent.
- Richard M. Frye, "Pre-Islamic and Early Islamic Cultures in Central Asia," in Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective, ed. Robert L. Canfield (Cambridge U. Press c. 1991), 35-53.
- Al Baladhuri, Abu Al Abbas Ahmad , "Kitab Futuh Al Buldun, Part II", pp227
- Fredunbeg, Mirza Kalichbeg, "The Chachnama: An Ancient History of Sind", pp57
- Al Baladhuri, Abu Al Abbas Ahmad , "Kitab Futuh Al Buldun,Part II",pp210
- Sen, Sailendra Nath, "Ancient Indian History and Civilization 2nd Edition", pp346
- Khushalani, Gobind, "Chachnama Retold An Account of the Arab Conquests of Sindh", pp221
- Editors: El Harier, Idris, & M'Baye, Ravene , "Spread of Islam Throughout the World ", pp594
- Mehta, Jaswant Lal , "Advanced Study in The History of Medieval India Vol 1", pp31
- Wink, Andre, " Al-Hind The Making of the Indo-Islamic Worlds Vol 1", pp119
- Crawford, Peter, "The War of the Three Gods: Romans, Persians and the Rise of Islam", pp192
- Wink, Andre, " Al-Hind The Making of the Indo-Islamic Worlds Vol 1", pp201
- Elliot, Henry, "Historians of India: Appendix The Arabs in Sind, Vol III, Part 1", pp9
- Khushalani, Gobind, "Chachnama Retold An Account of the Arab Conquests of Sindh", pp72
- Hoyland, Robert G., "In Gods Path: The Arab Conquests and Creation of An Islamic Empire", pp191
- Wink, Andre, " Al-Hind The Making of the Indo-Islamic Worlds Vol 2", pp113
- Dashti, Naseer, "The Baloch and Balochistan", pp65
- Al Baladhuri, Abu Al Abbas Ahmad , "Kitab Futuh Al Buldun, Part II", pp212
- Dashti, Naseer, "The Baloch and Balochistan", pp78
- Khushalani, Gobind, "Chachnama Retold An Account of the Arab Conquests of Sindh", pp76
- Al Baladhuri, Abu Al Abbas Ahmad , "Kitab Futuh Al Buldun, Part II", pp213
- Dashti, Naseer, "The Baloch and Balochistan", pp79
- Wink, Andre, " Al-Hind The Making of the Indo-Islamic Worlds Vol 1", pp128 - pp129
- Al Baladhuri, Abu Al Abbas Ahmad , "Kitab Futuh Al Buldun, Part II", pp149
- Al Baladhuri, Abu Al Abbas Ahmad , "Kitab Futuh Al Buldun, Part II", pp150
- Hoyland, Robert G., "In Gods Path: The Arab Conquests and Creation of An Islamic Empire", pp150
- Hitti, Philip, "History of The Arabs 10th Edition", pp209
- Kennedy, Hugh, "The Great Arab Conquests", pp196
- Hoyland, Robert G., "In Gods Path: The Arab Conquests and Creation of An Islamic Empire", pp152
- Kennedy, Hugh, "The Armies of The Caliph ", pp39
- Kennedy, Hugh, "The Prophet and The Age of The Caliphates", pp101
- Kennedy, Hugh, "The Great Arab Conquests", pp197 -pp198
- Fredunbeg, Mirza Kalichbeg, "The Chachnama: An Ancient History of Sind", pp57
- Editors: El Harier, Idris, & M'Baye, Ravene , "Spread of Islam Throughout the World ", pp604 - pp605
- Wink (2002), pg.164
- Nicholas F. Gier, FROM MONGOLS TO MUGHALS: RELIGIOUS VIOLENCE IN INDIA 9TH-18TH CENTURIES, Presented at the Pacific Northwest Regional Meeting American Academy of Religion, Gonzaga University, May, 2006 
- Alexander Berzin, "Part I: The Umayyad Caliphate (661 - 750 CE), The First Muslim Incursion into the Indian Subcontinent", The Historical Interaction between the Buddhist and Islamic Cultures before the Mongol Empire Last accessed September 11, 2007
- Wink (2002), 51-52
- Al Baladhuri, Abu Al Abbas Ahmad , "Kitab Futuh Al Buldun, Part II", pp216
- Fredunbeg, Mirza Kalichbeg, "The Chachnama: An Ancient History of Sind", pp69
- Wink (2004) pg 201-205
- Wink (2004) pg 131
- Kennedy, Hugh, "The Great Arab Conquests", pp301
- Haig, Wolseley, "The Cambridge History of India, Vol III", pp5
- Fredunbeg, Mirza Kalichbeg, "The Chachnama: An Ancient History of Sind", pp176
- Editors: El Harier, Idris, & M'Baye, Ravene , "Spread of Islam Throughout the World ", pp608
- Hitti, Philip, "History of The Arabs 10th Edition", pp212
- Blankinship, Khalid Y , "The End of Jihad State ", pp132
- Hasan, Mushirul , "Kashmir Under The Sultans", pp30
- Al Baladhuri, Abu Al Abbas Ahmad , "Kitab Futuh Al Buldun, Part II", pp210
- Blankinship, Khalid Y , "The End of Jihad State ", pp133
- Fredunbeg, Mirza Kalichbeg, "The Chachnama: An Ancient History of Sind", pp146
- Malik, Jamal , "Islam in South Asia: A Short History", pp51
- Blankinship, Khalid Y , "The End of Jihad State ", pp131
- Al Baladhuri, Abu Al Abbas Ahmad , "Kitab Futuh Al Buldun, Part II", pp226
- Wink, Andre, " Al-Hind The Making of the Indo-Islamic Worlds Vol 1", pp208
- Misra, Shyam, Manohar, "Yasoverman of Kanau ", pp56
- Misra, Shyam, Manohar, "Yasoverman of Kanau ", pp45
- Misra, Shyam, Manohar, "Yasoverman of Kanau ", pp48
- Sen, Sailendra Nath, "Ancient Indian History and Civilization 2nd Edition", pp11
- Sen, Sailendra Nath, "Ancient Indian History and Civilization 2nd Edition", pp344
- Al Baladhuri, Abu Al Abbas Ahmad , "Kitab Futuh Al Buldun, Part II", pp227
- Atherton, Cynthia P., "The Sculpture of Early Medieval Rajastann", pp14
- Bhandarkar 1929, pp. 29–30; Wink 2002, p. 208
- Bhandarkar 1929, pp. 30–31; Rāya 1939, p. 125; Majumdar 1977, p. 267; Puri 1986, p. 46; Wink 2002, p. 208
- Puri 1986, p. 46; Wink 2002, p. 209
- Majumder, Ramesh C., "Ancient INDIA ", pp261
- Bhandarkar 1929, pp. 29–30; Majumdar 1977, pp. 266–267; Puri 1986, p. 45; Wink 2002, p. 208; Sen 1999, p. 348
- Blankinship, Khalid Y , "The End of Jihad State ", pp202
- Elliot, Henry, "Historians of India: Appendix The Arabs in Sind, Vol III, Part 1", pp51
- Trade and Trade Routes in Ancient India by Moti Chandra p.213
- India Before Europe by Catherine B. Asher,Cynthia Talbot p.24
- Indian History V.K. Agnihotri: p.23
- A historical and cultural study of the inscriptions of Gujarat: p.109
- Satish Chandra, Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals (1206-1526), (Har-Anand Publications, 2006), 25.
- A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East, Vol. I, ed. Spencer C. Tucker, (ABC-CLIO, 2010), 263.
- International Encyclopaedia of Islamic Dynasties by Nagendra Kr Singh, Nagendra Kumar Singh. Published by Anmol Publications PVT. LTD. 2000 Page 28 ISBN 81-261-0403-1, ISBN 978-81-261-0403-1
- Ira M. Lapidus, A History of Islamic Societies 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press 2002
- "Mu'izz-al-Din Muhammad ibn Sam (Ghorid ruler of India)". Britannica Online Encyclopædia. Britannica.com. Retrieved 9 August 2009.
- B.F. Manz, "Tīmūr Lang", in Encyclopaedia of Islam, Online Edition, 2006
- The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, "Timur", 6th ed., Columbia University Press: "... Timur (timoor') or Tamerlane (tăm'urlān), c.1336–1405, Mongol conqueror, b. Kesh, near Samarkand. ...", (LINK)
- "Timur", in Encyclopaedia Britannica: "... [Timur] was a member of the Turkic Barlas clan of Mongols..."
- "Baber", in Encyclopaedia Britannica: "... Baber first tried to recover Samarkand, the former capital of the empire founded by his Mongol ancestor Timur Lenk ..."
- Volume III: To the Year A.D. 1398, Chapter: XVIII. Malfúzát-i Tímúrí, or Túzak-i Tímúrí: The Autobiography or Memoirs of Emperor Tímúr (Taimur the lame). Page 389. 1. Online copy, 2. Online copy) from: Elliot, Sir H. M., Edited by Dowson, John. The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians. The Muhammadan Period; published by London Trubner Company 1867–1877.
- The Islamic World to 1600: The Mongol Invasions (The Timurid Empire)
- Volume III: To the Year A.D. 1398, Chapter: XVIII. Malfúzát-i Tímúrí, or Túzak-i Tímúrí: The Autobiography or Memoirs of Emperor Tímúr (Taimur the lame). Page: 389 (1. Online copy, 2. Online copy) from: Elliot, Sir H. M., Edited by Dowson, John. The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians. The Muhammadan Period; London Trubner Company 1867–1877.
- Lane-Poole, Stanley (1907). "Chapter IX: Tinur's Account of His Invasion". History of India. The Grolier Society. Full text at Google Books
- B.F. Manz, "Tīmūr Lang", in Encyclopaedia of Islam.
- Timur in the Political Tradition and Historiography of Mughal India, Irfan Habib,p. 295-312
- Unknown (1590–95). "Bullocks dragging siege-guns up hill during Akbar's attack on Ranthambhor Fort". the Akbarnama.
- Wilbur, Marguerite Eyer (1951). The East India Company and the British Empire in the Far East. Stanford: Stanford University Press. p. 178. ISBN 9780804728645. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- S. M. Ikram (1964). "XIX. A Century of Political Decline: 1707–1803". In Ainslie T. Embree. Muslim Civilization in India. New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved 5 November 2011.
- Asger Christensen. "Aiding Afghanistan: The Background and Prospects for Reconstruction in a Fragmented Society" pp 12. NIAS Press, 1995. ISBN 8787062445
- Hamid Wahed Alikuzai. "A Concise History of Afghanistan in 25 Volumes, volume 14." pp. 202. Trafford Publishing, 2013. ISBN 1490714413
- [ http://www.britannica.com/place/India/Political-and-economic-decentralization-during-the-Mughal-decline#toc46985 Source]
- Elphinstone, Mountstuart; Cowell, Edward Byles (1866). "The History of India: The Hindú and Mahometan Periods".
- Jaques, Tony (2007). "Dictionary of Battles and Sieges". ISBN 9780313335372.
- Sarkar, Jadunath (1992). "Fall of the Mughal Empire: 1789-1803". ISBN 9780861317493.
- Mehta, J. L. Advanced study in the history of modern India 1707–1813
- Conflict and Conquest in the Islamic World: A Historical Encyclopedia [2 ... 2011-07-22. Retrieved 2014-08-18.
- War, Culture and Society in Early Modern South Asia, 1740-1849 - Kaushik Roy, Lecturer Department of History Kaushik Roy. 2011-03-30. Retrieved 2014-08-18.
- The Great Maratha Mahadaji Scindia – N. G. Rathod – Google Books. Retrieved 2014-08-18.
- History of the Marathas – R.S. Chaurasia. Retrieved 2014-08-18.
- Glover, William J (2008). "Making Lahore Modern: Constructing and Imagining a Colonial City". ISBN 9780816650217.
- Adamec, Ludwig W (2011-11-10). "Historical Dictionary of Afghanistan". ISBN 9780810879577.
- Griffin, Lepel H; Griffin, Sir Lepel Henry (1905). "Ranjit Singh and the Sikh Barrier Between Our Growing Empire and Central Asia". ISBN 9788120619180.
- Hunter, William Wilson (2004). Ranjit Singh: And the Sikh Barrier Between British Empire and Central Asia. ISBN 9788130700304.
- Jaques, Tony (2007). "Dictionary of Battles and Sieges". ISBN 9780313335396.
- Singh, Harbakhsh (July 2010). "War Despatches: Indo-Pak Conflict 1965". ISBN 9781935501299.
- R. Reilly, Robert (May 1, 2012). "Wanted: A Competent Commander in Chief; Dangerous Illusions about Islamism". The Washington Times.
- der Veer, pg 27–29
- Eaton, Richard M.'The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204–1760. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1993 1993, accessed on 1 May 2007
- Sir H. M. Elliot (1869). "Chapter II, Tarikh Yamini or Kitabu-l Yamini by Al Utbi". The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians. The Muhammadan Period. Trubner and Co. pp. 14–52.
- Caste in Indian Muslim Society
- Aggarwal, Patrap (1978). Caste and Social Stratification Among Muslims in India. Manohar.
- S.A.A. Rizvi The Wonder That Was India – II
- Islam and the sub-continent – appraising its impact
- McLeod (2002), pg. 33
- Page 292, "India's Interaction With China, Central and West Asia", written by Abdur Rahman, year 2002.
- "Ghazwa-e-Hind Hadith:Urdu and English". Ghazwa-e-Hind.org. Retrieved 2014-11-21.
- "Al-Qaeda plans final jihad:India Intel report points terror recruiment drive targeting nations Muslims". Daily Mail. Retrieved 2014-11-21.
- Negationism In India - Concealing The Record Of Islam. Koenraadelst.bharatvani.org. Retrieved on 2013-07-12.
- This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the Library of Congress Country Studies. – India, Pakistan
- ^ "ECIT Indian History Resources". Retrieved 5 December 2005.
- ^ "History of India syllabus". Retrieved 5 December 2005.
- ^ "About DeLacy O'Leary". Retrieved 10 April 2006.
- Gopal Mandir is devoted to the blue God Krishna who is the divine herdsman, the lover of milkmaids and the eighth embodiment of Lord Vishnu, the preserver of the Universe. The marble-curled around structure is a superior example of Maratha architecture. Lord Krishna’s two feet tall statue is carved in silver and is placed on a marble-inlaid altar with silver-plated doors. Mahmud of Ghazni had taken these doors from the famous Somnath Temple in Gujarat to Ghazni in Khorasan in 1026 AD. The Afghan trespasser, Mahmud Shah Abdali, later took the gates to Lahore, from where Shrinath Madhavji Shinde today popularly known as The Great Maratha Mahadji Scindia reacquired them. The Scindia ruler later established them in Gopal Mandir, bringing to a halt the doors’ long journey. Bayajibai Shinde, Maharaja Daulat Rao Scindia’s queen, built the temple in the 19th century. Its location in the middle of the market area right in the heart of the city adds to its popularity. Mosque and Tomb of the Emperor Soolta Mahmood of Ghuznee, publisher British Library
|Wikiquote has quotations related to: Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent|
- History of Islam in India by Neria Harish Hebbar (article with several pages)
- Library of modern Hindu history – The Islamic Ages
- A Response to Muslim Legacy in India
- Islamization and the Arab conquest of India
- The Legacy of Jihad in India
- Historical Interaction of Buddhism and Islam (Including an e-book on the various phases of Muslim Rulers conquering India)
- Dave's Homework
- History of Crafts, Manufacturing and Trade in South Asia
- Resources for the study of the Muslim Period of India