Islamic criminal jurisprudence
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2010)|
|Part of a series on|
Islamic criminal law (Arabic: فقه العقوبات) is criminal law in accordance with Sharia. Strictly speaking, Islamic law does not have a distinct corpus of "criminal law." It divides crimes into three different categories depending on the offense – Hudud (crimes "against God", whose punishment is fixed in the Quran and the Hadiths); Qisas (crimes against an individual or family whose punishment is equal retaliation in the Quran and the Hadiths); and Tazir (crimes whose punishment is not specified in the Quran and the Hadiths, and is left to the discretion of the ruler or Qadi, i.e. judge). Some add the fourth category of Siyasah (crimes against government), while others consider it as part of either Hadd or Tazir crimes.
Sharia courts do not use the adversarial system where two advocates (prosecutor and defense attorney) represent their parties' positions before an impartial jury or judge. All matters, even criminal ones, are in principle handled as disputes between individuals with a Islamic jurist deciding the outcome.
Hudud, meaning "limits", is the most serious category and includes crimes specified in the Quran.
- Drinking alcohol (sharb al-khamr, شرب الخمر)
- Theft (as-sariqah, السرقة)
- Highway robbery (qat`a at-tariyq, قطع الطريق)
- Illegal sexual intercourse (az-zinā', الزناء)
- False accusation of illegal sexual intercourse (qadhf, القذف)
- Apostasy (irtidād or ridda, ارتداد) - includes blasphemy.
Except for drinking alcohol, punishments for all other hudud crimes are specified in the Quran or Hadith.
The punishment for stealing is the amputation of the hand (Quran 5:38). This practice is still used today in countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Northern Nigeria. In Iran, amputation as punishment was described as "uncommon" in 2010, but in 2014 there were three sentences of hand amputation, and one of eye gouging in 2015. Fingers, but not the complete hand, were amputated as punishment four times in 2012-13.
The issue of qisas gained considerable attention in the Western media in 2009 when Ameneh Bahrami, an Iranian woman blinded in an acid attack, demanded that her attacker be blinded as well. The concept of punishment under Qisas is not based on "society" versus the "individual" (the wrong doer), but rather that of "individuals and families" (victim(s)) versus "individuals and families" (wrong doer(s)). Thus the victim has the ability to pardon the perpetrator and withhold punishment even in the case of murder. Bahrami pardoned her attacker and stopped his punishment (drops of acid in his eyes) just before it was to be administered in 2011.
We have prescribed for thee therein (the Torah) ‘a life for a life, and an eye for an eye, and a nose for a nose, and an ear for an ear, and a tooth for a tooth, and for wounds retaliation;’ but whoso remits it, it is an expiation for him, but he whoso will not judge by what God has revealed, these be the unjust.
Tazir includes any crime that does not fit into Hudud or Qisas and which therefore has no punishment specified in the Quran. Tazir in Islamic criminal jurisprudence are those crimes where the punishment is at the discretion of the state, the ruler or a Qadi, for actions considered sinful or destructive of public order, but which are not punishable as hadd or qisas under Sharia.
- Dammer, Harry; Albanese, Jay (2011, 2014). Comparative Criminal Justice Systems (5th ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 60. Retrieved 19 May 2015. Check date values in:
- Criminal Law Oxford Islamic Studies, Oxford University Press (2013)
- Mohamed S. El-Awa (1993). Punishment In Islamic Law. American Trust Publications. pp. 1–68. ISBN 978-0892591428.
- Silvia Tellenbach (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Law (Ed: Markus D. Dubber and Tatjana Hornle). Oxford University Press. pp. 251–253. ISBN 978-0199673599.
- Tabassum, Sadia (20 April 2011). "Combatants, not bandits: the status of rebels in Islamic law". International Review of the Red Cross 93 (881): 121–139. doi:10.1017/S1816383111000117.
- Omar A. Farrukh (1969). Ibn Taimiyya on Public and Private Law in Islam or Public Policy in Islamic Jurisprudence.
- M. Cherif Bassiouni (1997), Crimes and the Criminal Process, Arab Law Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 3 (1997), pp. 269-286
- Knut S Vikor. Between God and the Sultan: A History of Islamic Law. Oxford University Press: 2005. p.282
- Between Vision and Reality: Law in the Arab World, Guy Bechor, IDC Projects Publishing House, 2002. pp. 105-110
- [Quran 5:38]
- 16 October 2010 Last updated at 21:00 ET Share this pageFacebookTwitter ShareEmail Print Iranian chocolate thief faces hand amputation
- Bello, Ademola (25 May 2011). "Who Will Save Amputees of Sharia Law in Nigeria?". Huffington Post.
- IRAN: Man convicted of theft loses hand, October 24, 2010
- "Amputation and Eye-Gouging". Human Rights & Democracy for Iran. Retrieved 20 May 2015.
- Visions of Sharia| orlando sentinel
- "In Iran, a case of an eye for an eye"| Phillie Metro| March 29, 2009
- Burki, Shireen (2013). The Politics of State Intervention: Gender Politics in Pakistan, Afghanistan .. Lexington Books. p. 238-9. Retrieved 19 May 2015.
- [Quran 5:45]
- Mark Cammack (2012), Islamic Law and Crime in Contemporary Courts, BERKELEY J. OF MIDDLE EASTERN & ISLAMIC LAW, Vol. 4, No.1, p. 2
- Basic features of Islamic criminal law Christine Schirrmacher (2008), Islam Institute, Germany
- Islamic Criminal Law and Procedure Matthew Lipman, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Volume XII, Issue 1, pp. 29-62
- Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law - Theory and Practice from the Sixteenth to the Twenty-First Century Rudolph Peters (2006)