It's Even Worse Than It Looks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
It's Even Worse Than It Looks
It's Even Worse Than It Looks.jpg
First edition hardcover image
AuthorThomas E. Mann
Norman J. Ornstein
CountryUnited States
SubjectPolitics of the United States
Political parties in the United States
Political polarization
PublisherBasic Books
Publication date
1 May 2012
Preceded byThe Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track

It's Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of Extremism is a 2012 book of political analysis authored by Thomas E. Mann of the Brookings Institution and Norman J. Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute, published by Basic Books. In the work, they detail controversial issues surrounding the United States Congress and determine that the institution has become weakened to the point of being almost completely useless. The general political polarization and specific rise of hard-line ideological views have, in the authors' opinion, created such social division that the nation's federal system as a whole finds itself essentially unable to govern. Specifically, the authors criticize the U.S. Republican Party as becoming captured by a dogmatic right-wing fringe and functioning as "an insurgent outlier" in terms of the general American political spectrum.

The book has received praise from various publications such as The Economist and The Hill.[1][2]

The 2016 paperback version of the book featured a cover stating It's Even Worse Than It Was and included additional comments by the authors remarking upon the past few years after the first edition came out.[3]


Norman Ornstein's work at the American Enterprise Institute and Thomas Mann's work at the Brookings Institution had brought them into the public eye before, as well as giving them the respect of other political analysts. They previously collaborated on the well-regarded book The Broken Branch.[2] The two have worked in Washington D.C. for more than forty years, Ornstein in particular having written columns for Roll Call and served as an election analyst for CBS News. According to NPR, "they're renowned for their carefully nonpartisan positions."[4]


The authors analyze the current U.S. Congress, and they conclude that the lawmaking body is now almost completely ineffectual. Two sources of the problem are given. The first is the serious mismatch between the two major parties, the Democrats and the Republicans, in their view. They state that the groups "have become as vehemently adversarial as parliamentary parties, and [in] a governing system that, unlike a parliamentary democracy, makes it extremely difficult for majorities to act".[2]

Mann and Ornstein specifically criticize the right-ward move of the Republican Party, especially the use of administrative and parliamentary tricks to keep from having clear votes on some issues. The authors describe the party as "an insurgent outlier--ideologically extreme; contemptuous of the inherited social and economic policy regime; scornful of compromise; unpersuaded by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition".[4][5]

Reception and reviews[edit]

The book was published the same year as the 2012 United States Presidential election. The election campaign brought attention to it as a descriptor of a major aspect of the campaign, the imbalance between the two major parties in the political degrees they went to win elections, and the difficulty the media had in avoiding false equivalence storylines. Prior to the book, the authors were routinely cited as sources by the national press.[5][6]

A mostly favorable review came from The Economist, the publication remarking that Mann and Ornstein have "devoted a good deal of thought to ways the system can be rescued and improved" to "their great credit". The book's "constructive ideas" additionally received praise.[2] The Hill published praise from journalist Juan Williams, who stated that the work "fillets the traditional media for perpetuating a principle of false equivalence in its coverage of the two parties... [masking] the GOP's unalloyed march toward the fringes of the right wing". He additionally labeled the book "[i]nsightful."[1]

[T]wo respected centrist scholars, Norman Ornstein and Thomas Mann, have written a book that moves past the bland and lazy conventional wisdom. They argue, with a truckload of evidence, that the blame in Washington lies overwhelmingly with Republicans. . . . .Our national politics has turned a strange corner. And it is a cop-out to say that both parties are equally to blame. Strained attempts to be even-handed distort the reality we face. . . . The book is titled It's Even Worse Than It Looks and it is both fascinating and alarming."

Reporter Michael Brissenden of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation commented that the authors had assembled "a truckload of evidence" in supprot of their views", Brissenden considering the book ""both fascinating and alarming".[1]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b c "It's Even Worse Than It Looks". Retrieved April 6, 2012.
  2. ^ a b c d Lexington blog (26 April 2012). "Congress: Even worse". Lexington's Notebook. The Economist. Retrieved 16 September 2012.
  3. ^
  4. ^ a b Steve Inskeep (30 April 2012). "Extremism In Congress: 'Even Worse Than It Looks'?" (Interview). Morning Edition. National Public Radio. Retrieved 16 September 2012. GOP at root of dysfunction, Congressional scholars say
  5. ^ a b "How the Mainstream Press Bungled the Single Biggest Story of the 2012 Campaign", Dan Froomkin, Huffington Post, December 7, 2012
  6. ^ Savan, Leslie (January 11, 2013), "Banned From TV on Conventional Wisdom's Holy Day, Ornstein and Mann Briefly Return", The Nation, retrieved 2013-02-18

External links[edit]